Diggin’ Deep on UFC Vegas 34: Can Cannonier crack the chin of Gastelum?

Jared Cannonier fighting Jack Hermansson at UFC Copenhagen
Photo by Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images

In comparison to many of the other Fight Night main events, Jared Cannonier and Kelvin Gastelum is a perfectly acceptable main event for UFC Vegas 34. It’s far from a great headliner, but given Gastelum is a replacement for Paulo Costa, it isn’t one that I’ll complain about.

Well, I won’t complain about the quality of the match by itself, but there was already a fight on the card that I would have rather seen go five rounds instead. After all, it’s certainly possible Alexandre Pantoja could get a crack at the flyweight title if he can overcome Brandon Royval. Some will point out Cannonier could also get a title shot with a win, but who would you rather see potentially go five rounds: a pair of kill-or-be-killed flyweights or a pair of measured middleweights? Even worse, the UFC didn’t even give Pantoja and Royval the dignity of being the co-main event. When they market the flyweights like they don’t matter, they’re telling the fans flyweights don’t matter. No wonder the flyweights aren’t a money division.

Stream all the fights broadcast LIVE RIGHT HERE — don’t miss a single second of face-punching action!

Jared Cannonier vs. Kelvin Gastelum, Middleweight

Arguably, Cannonier is the hardest hitter in the middleweight division. The former heavyweight has secured everyone of his victories at middleweight via KO/TKO, putting his prodigious power on display once he made the drop to 185. His violent ways led to Israel Adesanya to encourage him to get an impressive win and there was a good chance he’d get a crack at the gold belt. However, there are plenty who believe his resume would still be lacking. Gastelum has lost four of his last five, meaning a loss to Cannonier would drop him to losses in five of his last six. That doesn’t sound like much of title clincher. His other wins in the division are David Branch (zero wins since that loss almost three years ago), Anderson Silva (long past his prime), and Jack Hermansson (his best win, but Hermansson doesn’t appear to be top 5).

Then again, the quality of competition argument could be made about Gastelum. The former TUF winner was fortunate to be pit against a slew of opponents on the backside of their careers. In fact, only two of his twelve UFC wins (I’m counting his NC) have come against competitors still on the roster: his most recent win over Ian Heinisch and his debut win over Uriah Hall. Bottom line: even though these two have been on the roster for years, there’s plenty of reason to question just how good they are.

Given Gastelum’s recent skid, the consensus has been to pick Cannonier. However, there are plenty of reasons to believe there is a clear path to victory for Gastelum. First of all, Gastelum has one of the notoriously hardest chins to crack in the business. Not noted for his defensive tendencies, Gastelum has eaten the best his opponents have had to offer and kept coming. Cannonier has historically struggled to stop takedowns and when Gastelum remembers, he has a nasty wrestling game and an underrated ability to get an opponents back. Plus, Gastelum has historically been the busier fighter.

Of course, there are reasons besides the obvious to believe Cannonier will take this contest. While it’s true Gastelum has never been put away with strikes, there are signs his chin is weakening. He was hurt early in his most recent contest with Robert Whittaker and showed a surprising reluctance to engage. Does he no longer trust in his chin? That reluctance also leaves open the possibility of Cannonier being the busier fighter, especially if Cannonier starts landing his low kicks early and often as Gastelum is unlikely to do anything to deter Cannonier from chewing up his legs. Plus, while Cannonier originally started as a heavyweight, Gastelum notoriously blew his tenure at welterweight with several botched weight cuts. Cannonier is naturally quite a bit bigger than Gastelum, which might be enough for him to stuff Gastelum’s potential takedowns.

Despite being undersized, Gastelum has the physical talents to win this contest more often than not. Unfortunately, he has relied so much on those physical gifts that he has never been able to put it all together on the mental side of things. Perhaps Gastelum finds a way to put together a disciplined performance, but I haven’t seen him do it enough to justify picking him here. In fact, nobody’s chin lasts forever and I think Cannonier has the stuff to crack him. Cannonier via KO of RD2

Alexandre Pantoja vs. Brandon Royval, Flyweight

The stakes are about as high as they get outside of a title fight in this contest. Pantoja may have lost to Askar Askarov last year, but Pantoja has missed weight recently (whereas Askarov has) and Pantoja also has a win over reigning champion, Brandon Moreno, two if you count their exhibition contest on TUF. Royval might even be able to secure a title shot with a win. His only UFC loss is to Moreno and that was due to a shoulder injury. Plus, his go-for-broke style is an easy sell.

Given what he has shown in his three UFC contests thus far, it wouldn’t be a stretch to label Royval as one of the most exciting members upon the roster. He isn’t the most technical fighter, but has a sixth sense for when to take a risk, acquired after many years of trial and error of his risk taking ways. Of course, if he doesn’t make good on his spinning attack or submission off his back, he tends to leave himself in a very vulnerable state.

There’s no doubt Pantoja would not only be willing to take advantage of an opening provided by Royval, he’d be able. Only Deiveson Figueiredo and perhaps Manel Kape offer more punching power in the flyweight division and there are some who would argue his grappling may be the most dangerous part of his game. Of course, much of his ability on the ground hasn’t been seen by viewers very often due to his own love of a firefight.

There’s two things that leave me leaning in the direction of Pantoja. First, the difference in their durability. Pantoja has never been finished whereas Royval’s history of shoulder issues will forever be an issue. Secondly, while there’s no denying Pantoja is a wild man, his attack has a more technical base to it, both on the feet and mat. Plus, there appears to be a shelf life to the type of reckless attack put forth by Royval. It’s very possible he still has some time before it hits his expiration date, but Pantoja’s more mature blend of technique and risk taking has me leaning in the direction of the Brazilian. Pantoja via decision

Back to top ↑