How to defeat the UFC

UFC has "lined their pockets with our blood," said former heavyweight Mark Hunt in 2016.

In 2020, the UFC is still lining their pockets with fighters' blood. UFC president Dana White, a leasing-monger with the scruples of a Bronx sewer rat, has achieved a net worth of $500 million upon the blood, sweat and tears of professional fighters.

Throughout his leadership, White has consistently abused his fighters, resisted unionization attempts, and insulted anyone who dares challenge his authority. The natural question is how does White get away with such behavior?

UFC has dominant market power

The answer lies in the UFC's dominant market power. Examples here, here and here.

Further, the UFC’s market share has been estimated to be as high as 90% and its profit margins are the highest in professional sports.

So why don't fighters organize against this abuse? Because the UFC "encourages a climate of fear where other people on the roster are going to be fearful of publicly organizing and standing up for their rights," said featherweight Leslie Smith. Fighters are prohibited from leaving for rival leagues and have short career spans, which makes it critical to maximize earnings as fast as possible. If fighters speak out, the UFC brazenly retaliates by offering less money or releasing fighters entirely.

The Olympics as a model

In past years, we've seen several attempts to compete with the UFC including Bellator, ONE Championship and the Professional Fighters League. However, these attempts typically mimic the UFC's approach of pitting individual fighters against each other and have experienced little success.

We believe it's time for a different approach: one that transforms MMA from an individual sport to a team sport. Here's the context:

In the Olympic Games, world-class teams of athletes compete against rivals in over 40 categories including gymnastics, ice skating and basketball. As a reference point, over 50% of the world's population watched part of the 2016 Rio de Janeiro games. Even less-popular events such as curling can draw millions of viewers.

In contrast, the recent UFC 251 Usman-Masvidal fight achieved only 1.3 million PPV buys.

Why are the Olympics so popular? Reasons include national pride and the nature of a quadrennial event which builds anticipation across the globe. The entire world watches the Olympics at the same time, which creates a uniquely communal experience.

"Glory belongs to the act of being constant to something greater than yourself, to a cause, to your principles, to the people on whom you rely and whom rely on you." " – John McCain

Viewers need memorable events they can look forward to every year. This helps to build social routines such as Super Bowl and World Series watch parties.

Expanding the market for MMA

To compete with the UFC, we have to build a better fan experience than the UFC. One that expands the audience and revenue from MMA.

Here's an analogy: when Uber was founded in 2009, the global taxi market was $14.7 billion. By 2030, the taxi market will reach $70 billion but the ride-sharing market will reach an even higher $215 billion (source: Goldman Sachs). Uber -- along with Lyft, Gojek and others -- created a better experience for customers, which expanded the market far beyond its early levels.

Today, only 25% of Americans identify as MMA fans. To reach a mainstream audience, we need to increase awareness. One way is to leverage intercity, interstate and international rivalries.

A new idea: MMA Teams

For example, consider a league with teams of fighters competing against other teams from a city, state or country. Imagine MMA versions of classic sports rivalries such as Los Angeles vs. San Francisco, California vs. New York, or Argentina vs. Brazil.

On second thought, Argentina vs. Brazil may not be close, at least in MMA. Maybe Brazil vs. USA?

As one suggestion, we could assemble a San Francisco welterweight team with three fighters (and a few alternates in case of injury) to compete against the Los Angeles welterweight team. Visualize three fights per weight class with a best 2-of-3 format. If SF wins 2 out of 3 fights in a weight class, then SF wins the Baddest Mother****er "Best Welterweight in California" title. We could repeat this format for other weight classes.

Unlike the UFC's divide-and-conquer tactics, a team approach would enable fighters from the same hometown to train together and build camaraderie. MMA team events could occur at the same time every year in order to build anticipation and excitement. Perhaps in the late summer to avoid competing for viewers with the MLB World Series or NFL season?

Would you watch a team of your city's best fighters take on another city? Maybe for the chance at a free t-shirt?

Innovating with social media

Today, the UFC prohibits fans from posting its content on social media (Facebook, Instagram and YouTube). This is shortsighted and a missed opportunity, but as a monopsony the UFC has little incentive to innovate the fan experience.

In contrast, the NBA permits fans to post its content on social media. This allows fans to create, share and enjoy highlights, which fuels viral sharing and re-sharing in an organic way. As one example, the Instagram fan page House of Highlights has 17.5 million followers.

Like the NBA, MMA team events should leverage its fighters' popularity and capitalize on its diverse personalities (hello Tony Ferguson!) by sharing key moments in their lives, both in and out of the cage.

We could also innovate by leveraging wearable and other technologies (interactive contests, live chatstreams and multiple camera POV angles), to engage with fans and expand the market even further. The possibilities are truly endless.

What success could look like

If we can build a better experience than the UFC, we can create more awareness, reach more fans and generate more revenue. This would decrease the UFC's market power and create better financial, health and other outcomes for fighters.

Imagine a league that pays its fighters fairly, similar to the 50% revenue sharing agreement between the NBA and its players. Imagine a league whose power is balanced with a fighters' association similar to the NBA Players Association. Imagine a league that provides healthcare and insurance over the span of a fighter's contract, with careful monitoring for PCS, CTE and other disorders.

Why should we do this? Fighters like David Mitchell, Tito Ortiz and Leslie Smith deserve better. We deserve better.

So who could spearhead a new league with MMA teams? Perhaps someone who's not a fan of Dana White. In light of White's less-than-amiable personality and muck-spout tendencies, finding the right person shouldn't be difficult.

Now where did I leave Oscar de la Hoya's number?

\The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.