Bloody Elbow: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:

Network Bar & Login
Section Navigation
Main Blog Content
Secondary Sidebar: Links to Recent Stories, FanPosts and FanShots
Masthead

Around SBN: SB Nation NBA Power Rankings for Week 2

IFL Weigh In Results

by Nick Thomas on Apr 4, 2008 11:14 AM EDT Comment 16 comments

Mark Miller (170.4) vs. Jay Hieron (170)

The event begins at tonight at 7:30 pm EST, with the live broadcast on HDNet beginning an hour later.

Wagnney Fabiano (145.4) vs. Shad Lierley (145.8)

Vladimir Matyushenko (205.4) vs. Jamal Patterson (205.6)

Non-Title Fights

Delson Heleno (170.8) vs. Brad Blackburn (171)

Jim Miller (155) vs. Bart Palaszewski (155.5)

Nate Lamotte (155.8) vs. Chris Horodecki (154.6)

Mike Ciesnolevicz (206) vs. Carmelo Marrero (205.8)

Emyr Bussade (170) vs. Jesse Lennox (170)

Rafael Dias (145.6) vs. L.C. Davis (145.6)

Alex Schoenauer (204) vs. Brendan Barrett (205.5)

The Biggest Loser Contestants

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

0 recs | Comment 16 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

This is the first IFL show I'm actually interested in.

by Kid Nate on Apr 4, 2008 3:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

Then you haven't paid enough attention to the IFL over the last year my friend. Not always stacked top to bottom but I think they've done a good job of putting together compelling cards.

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 4, 2008 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

Which is why I'm disappointed that the IFL isn't doing better.

The team concept of the first two years may not have been a good idea but they have always had good fights.

And lol @ lamotte with the spongebob trunks.

by Tonley on Apr 4, 2008 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

i've watched their show several times and always zoned out. a few fights were good but there was always a ton of stinkers and the editing on the show killed the fun.

by Kid Nate on Apr 4, 2008 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

You were also probably watching them at 4pm or whatever terrible time slot they had.

by Simco on Apr 4, 2008 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

no the DVR solved that but the fastforward button proved pretty irresistable.

by Kid Nate on Apr 4, 2008 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

it's 830pm EST.

by Simco on Apr 4, 2008 4:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

My bets for the evening:

Jim Miller (medium bet) and a small bet on Patterson. Patterson probably ain't winning. But I'm hoping like hell he pulls something off and I just haven't been able to get the idea out of my head that he will do it.

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 4, 2008 5:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

think Nate will beat Horodecki?

by Kid Nate on Apr 4, 2008 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

Nope. Horodecki is going to come out blazing to get some "mojo" back after that loss.

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 4, 2008 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

That being said...I may throw a little change down on him.

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 4, 2008 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

him = Nate

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 4, 2008 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

miller, miller, and blackburn are all dogs that i think have a decent chance at winning.

by robnashville on Apr 4, 2008 7:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

2 for 2 so far

by robnashville on Apr 4, 2008 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

Lamotte gave a hell of a fight. I could have even seen him getting the nod in the decision. Very good fight.

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 4, 2008 9:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Re: IFL Weigh In Results

Well. I went 1-2 on my bets. But came out ahead...by a whopping $2. Better to win $2 than lose 2 though I guess.

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 4, 2008 11:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed

Search

Recent Posts