MMA Media 101
Last week on this site, I alluded to an article that I am working on discussing the current state of the MMA media. In the teaser, I indicated that I would be focusing on the following aspect of the MMA media:
Trend Originators, Influencers, Adopters, and the Followers
In short, let me break down what these advertising-type terms mean for this upcoming article:
Trend Originators: Think about who you trust or go to for hardcore news or fresh information.
Influencers: Consider this a hybrid group of people who report both news and also influence current news available to you.
Adopters: People who write about MMA but are generally impacted by what influencers say and what the trend originators establish.
Followers: Self-explanatory.
In a perfect world, these four categories would form a pyramid and you would have a gradually established diagram where you had a limited amount of originators, a few more influencers, then several adopters, and many followers. (I'll argue in the upcoming article that one of the reasons the MMA Media 'pyramid' is out-of-sorts is due in part to there not being balance in these four categories).
So, the question I pose to you (and I want you to give me your answers in the comments section here) is this. Based on your experiences and opinions, who would you classify in the MMA Media as a) trend originators, b) influencers, and c) adopters. Think about it for a little while, and then post a response to this. I want to hear your answers and feedback on this question.
If we are going to improve the quality of the MMA media coverage, then we need to call a spade a spade and start identifying who the current power brokers are and how to grow the media audience covering this industry.
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
Re: MMA Media 101
Trend Originators - MMA Weekly and Sherdog are the top two sites. I think MMA Weekly is tops mainly because their reports and rumored match ups just about always accurate. Sherdog's influence can't be denied although I tend to dislike most of their staff's commentaries. Their Fight Finder database is essential though.
Influencers: Full Contact Fighter and Fight Network are both large and usually have good info, but they rarely have scoops and I like them better for recaps. FCF's newspaper has good interviews and recaps but the print version obviously is limited in terms of fresh stories. Their website isn't as competitive or indepth as the Originators. Fight Network has also jumped the gun too many times trying to get a scoop only to have their info turn out to be wrong. So I don't trust their news as much as the Originators. Inside Fighting, Fight Opinion, Bloody Elbow (still think Mad Squabbles was a better blog name), Five Ounces of Pain, Whaledog, and China Combat would round out the sites that I also consider to be influencers. The majority of their news seems to be second hand but they're always up to date and I enjoy their commentary. Whaledog might have to be taken off due to the lack of posts. China Combat doesn't have many posts but it's pretty much the only place I know of that has insights into the development of MMA in China.
Adopters: UFC Junkie and UFC Mania are probably the two biggest adopters that jump out at me. Although Junkie has tried to transition and upgrade to an Influencer both sites are still mostly filled with links to other sites who have broken the news. I don't find either site's commentary to be very interesting or thought provoking but they're good for finding a collection of UFC links all in one spot. MMA California's regional approach is refreshing but none of the writers seem particularly knowledgeable of the sport. Or if they are they don't convey it well in their posts.
Followers: The Underground and Sherdog forums.
by soulrise on Aug 14, 2007 5:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
There are a few sites that are purely Originators, like the Houston Chronicle guy, the Baltimore paper guy and MMAweekly, but there is only so much news you can originate so I prefer the consolidated news summaries provided by Junkie and Mania, followed by this site, 5oz and Fight Opinion. You have to love the Fightlinker as well.
by Ken on Aug 14, 2007 8:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
by Luke Thomas on Aug 14, 2007 10:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
Alot of fighters have their myspace page where they will announce their next fight... or they or someone from their team will leak it to a website.
I actually think UFCjunkie has been announcing quite a few matchups, but they are a purely UFC blog... not really MMA.
Sherdog has got to be considered the biggest MMA news outlet in America. They have the most traffic, they cover events worldwide, and then they got that affiliation with ESPN. That puts them on top. Also, I think their "war with Dana White" is positively comical.
by penxv on Aug 14, 2007 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
I think the mainstream outlets are important for the sport, but they aren't particularly insightful.
by penxv on Aug 14, 2007 12:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
Influencers: Five Ounces of Pain, Bloody Elbow, FightOpinion
Dunno about the rest :-p
by fightlinker on Aug 14, 2007 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
by Luke Thomas on Aug 14, 2007 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
And the site is fixed ... the sidebar now works on Internet explorer. So it turns out 'if it ain't broke, you should break it and then when it's fixed it will work even better!'
by fightlinker on Aug 14, 2007 1:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
I feel that the type of news Real Fighter provides (analytical, research-based and fact-checked) gets overlooked. I don't mean to be self-promotional, but this is a major frustration for me and I could use some insight. Are MMA audiences only interested in scoops?
by Real Fighter mag on Aug 14, 2007 1:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
Past that it may not be your content but your marketing that's the problem. Marketing is the biggest reason why most sites aren't getting the hits they deserve. God knows if I spent more time marketing than i did writing, I'd have 5 times as many hits, but half as much content.
I'd rather just do content, because my site is just a masturbatory indulgence at the moment. Although I do admit I enjoy it more when people are watching ;-)
by fightlinker on Aug 14, 2007 2:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
by Real Fighter mag on Aug 14, 2007 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: MMA Media 101
I'll start with your last question first.
Yes, my impression is that when people hear the term "MMA media" they automatically think of the web. Can anyone really blame them? Whatever exists in print now has grown out of what started on the Internet. On top of that, the overwhelming majority of MMA media outlets are solely web-based. It's only natural that the Internet is the first place people go to in their minds.
With respect to updates on who's fighting who and where passing for journalism, I'm in complete agreement. I would back off a little and say most of the websites who post that information are blogs acting as news outlets even when they break news. But really, it's true. The market for opinion or voice in covering the sport is developing, but it's certainly a niche thing at the moment. Ironic, really. For a sport that causes such heated debate and discussion, you'd think "voices" would be a hot commodity. Instead, most people tend to tune them out in favor of their own opinion. Only those perceived as adding to the normal discussion get noticed. That's a general rule no matter the sport, but it's particularly pronounced in MMA.
by Luke Thomas on Aug 14, 2007 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by Zach Arnold on 














