Why the rematch with Alexander Gustafsson will define Jon Jones


Another one bites the dust. That had to be the sentiment many in attendance had after they watched yet another contender fall by the wayside at UFC 172.

Glover Teixeira had never lost in the UFC prior to facing Jones. With dominant wins over names like Quinton Jackson and Ryan Badder, Teixeira figured to be as game as any contender to throne during the Jones era. He fought the good fight, but like so many fighters who had come before him it just wasn't enough to beat Jon Jones.

Names like Quinton Jackson, Vitor Belfort, Rashad Evans, Lyoto Machida, and Mauricio Rua tried, but ultimately fell to Jones in dominant fashion, just as Teixeira did this past Saturday.

Fans and critics had made reference to the length and reach advantage he enjoyed over his opponents as the reason for his dominance over the rest of the division. Could it be that the key to Jones success was his 85" reach?

Enter Alexander Gustafsson. An unheralded contender who stood 6'5" tall and possessed the length to rival Jones. Gustafsson shocked all in attendance at UFC 165, when he not only took the fight to Jones, he arguably won 3 rounds of the fight against the champion. As it would turn out Jones would remain undefeated winning a unanimous decision on all three of the judges scorecards.

All of a sudden there were cracks in the armor. A fighter who had looked unbeatable came as close to losing as humanly possible without going over the cliff. We started hearing those familiar rumblings among the fans, many of them who claimed that Jones success was largely due to the length and height advantages he enjoyed over the rest of division. Gustafsson was the first fighter who measured up to Jones and it had a predictable impact on the fight. The man who had never been taken down in the UFC found himself on his back against Gustafsson. All of a sudden Jones, who had rarely been hit cleanly in his fights found himself getting tagged repeatedly, he was even made to see his own blood as a cut above his eye sustained in the first round continued to bleed throughout the fight.

Despite being down 2-1 and losing the 4th round, he was able to pull out the victory by digging deeper than he ever had to before. He showed more of himself in those last 2 rounds than he previously did in all of his other fights. He had looked into the abyss and managed to return damaged but with championship still intact.

Jones has been the most dominant light heavyweight champion in the history of the UFC, but he needs to beat Gustafsson in convincing fashion to cement that legacy. Fail to produce a dominant win, and the critics will come out in droves. He recently stated that he only went 80% against Gustafsson the first time around. Anything less than 100% won't cut it this time. Is Jones only so dominant because of his size? That question will be answered when the two men face off for the second time.

\The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bloody Elbow

You must be a member of Bloody Elbow to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bloody Elbow. You should read them.

Join Bloody Elbow

You must be a member of Bloody Elbow to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bloody Elbow. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.