Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Strikeforce: Cormier vs. Barnett Fight Video Highlights

Nevada Temporarily Suspends Nick Diaz' License, Open To Medicinal Marijuana Request

Carlos Condit vs Nick Diaz by Esther Lin

Following his decision loss to Carlos Condit at UFC 143, Nick Diaz' drug screening came back positive for marijuana metabolites. This is the second time that Diaz has tested positive for marijuana in Nevade with the first time following his fight against Takanori Gomi at Pride 33 in 2007. He was suspended for six months and fined twenty percent of his fight purse. The win was also overturned to a no contest.

A temporary suspension of his fight license has been handed down to Diaz on the Wednesday meeting following his UFC 143 positive test. The request was made by Christopher Eccles, the Nevada deputy Attorney General and the commission unanimously agreed on the motion. A follow up disciplinary meeting will be scheduled where Nick Diaz will be able to defend his usage of marijuana. Nick Diaz was not on the call Wednesday afternoon.

Wednesday's pre-hearing was overseen by commission chairman Skip Avansino, who requested that documentation from the 2007 hearing be made available as well as any disciplinary actions handed down from other commissions. Diaz had prior issues with the California State Athletic Commission while in Strikeforce.

Diaz' case is unique as marijuana is prescribed by a doctor to help him with his ADHD in the state of California. He will likely request exemption for medicinal marijuana usage. This is without precedent as there has never been another case of a fighter asking for marijuana exemption. There is also a possibility that Diaz would request a retroactive exemption which could possibly change the No Contest back to a win.

Diaz could face up to a year suspension as well as a financial fine. The commission requested his financial earning from UFC 143 which would put not just his purse but any bonuses received at risk. His base salary was $200,000 though it is very likely that he also received undisclosed "locker room" and PPV based bonuses as well.

SBN coverage of UFC 143: Diaz vs. Condit

Comment 90 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It’s sad that in 2012, pot is still controversial.

by Kenya_MMA on Feb 22, 2012 2:32 PM EST reply actions  

Well it is a major source of income for criminal organizations.

So there’s that.

Menckenstein:
(noun)
Definition: a traditional doll crafted from the stomach hair of obese, unkempt, typically diabetic men who suck at fighting. This type of doll is commonly crafted in the deep South and seems to be exclusively purchased by fans of the NBA franchise the LA Lakers, who believe the dolls give them the power to be as cool as Celtics fans.
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Feb 22, 2012 2:37 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Alcohol was also a major source of income for mobsters during prohibition

but look at the industry it has become. It can be regulated & make a shit-ton of money for the gov’t…even local police forces.

ATF&W?

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 22, 2012 2:46 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I think the issue was there was no "industry" for weed before it was made illegal

Whereas with alcohol there have been breweries and distribution to pubs since before the founding of the country.

Menckenstein:
(noun)
Definition: a traditional doll crafted from the stomach hair of obese, unkempt, typically diabetic men who suck at fighting. This type of doll is commonly crafted in the deep South and seems to be exclusively purchased by fans of the NBA franchise the LA Lakers, who believe the dolls give them the power to be as cool as Celtics fans.
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Feb 22, 2012 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

history tells a different story
“The culture [of tobacco] is pernicious. This plant greatly exhausts the soil. Of course, it requires much manure, therefore other productions are deprived of manure, yielding no nourishment for cattle, there is no return for the manure expended… It is impolitic… The fact well established in the system of agriculture is that the best hemp and the best tobacco grow on the same kind of soil. The former article is of the first necessity to the commerce and marine, in other words to the wealth and protection of the country. The latter, never useful and sometimes pernicious, derives its estimation from caprice, and its best value from the taxes to which it was formerly exposed…”
— Thomas Jefferson
Farm Journal (16 March 1791)
“What was done with the seed saved from the India Hemp last summer? It ought, all of it, to have been sewn again; that not only a stock of seed sufficient for my own purposes might have been raised, but to have disseminated the seed to others; as it is more valuable than the common Hemp.”
George Washington
Writings of Washington, Vol. 35, pg. 72

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 22, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Are you saying from those two quotes that you came to the conclusion that marijuana was as widely used and distributed as alcohol up until it was deemed illegal?

Menckenstein:
(noun)
Definition: a traditional doll crafted from the stomach hair of obese, unkempt, typically diabetic men who suck at fighting. This type of doll is commonly crafted in the deep South and seems to be exclusively purchased by fans of the NBA franchise the LA Lakers, who believe the dolls give them the power to be as cool as Celtics fans.
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Feb 22, 2012 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

yes

it’s only the tip of the iceberg so you’ll have to more research if you’re interested…I can’t post a dissertation to someone who may not be interested in a history lesson.

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 22, 2012 6:14 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

this might also serve as visual proof

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 22, 2012 6:41 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I really hope that everybody reads this

Thanks for posting all of that.

BE Civil War - The Filipino Reccing Machines

by KNOWLEGE on Feb 22, 2012 8:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Sweet. I'm learnin'!!!

This is a lot of good info. Thanks BE buddies.

Menckenstein:
(noun)
Definition: a traditional doll crafted from the stomach hair of obese, unkempt, typically diabetic men who suck at fighting. This type of doll is commonly crafted in the deep South and seems to be exclusively purchased by fans of the NBA franchise the LA Lakers, who believe the dolls give them the power to be as cool as Celtics fans.
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Feb 23, 2012 8:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Before it was illegal, there was a large Hemp industry for hundreds, even thousands of years..

Marijuana is illegal in the US because of the DuPont Company. The DuPont Company wanted marijuana to be illegal because they wanted to do away with The Hemp Industry because The DuPont Company had just invented Polyester and Nylon.

What better way to make it illegal than to focus on the other, more recreational, way that people liked (and still like) to use marijuana. The DuPont Company made smoking marijuana seem like it was worse than heroin by creating many forms of propaganda.

Look it up..

BE Civil War - The Filipino Reccing Machines

by KNOWLEGE on Feb 22, 2012 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Dropping some KNOWLEDGE

There's no moral order at all. There's just this: can my violence conquer yours?

by ElliotMatheny on Feb 22, 2012 6:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

It's not like legalizing alcohol made the world a better place:
Alcohol causes nearly 4 percent of deaths worldwide, more than AIDS, tuberculosis or violence, the World Health Organization warned on Friday.

Rising incomes have triggered more drinking in heavily populated countries in Africa and Asia, including India and South Africa, and binge drinking is a problem in many developed countries, the United Nations agency said.

Yet alcohol control policies are weak and remain a low priority for most governments despite drinking’s heavy toll on society from road accidents, violence, disease, child neglect and job absenteeism, it said.

Approximately 2.5 million people die each year from alcohol related causes, the WHO said in its “Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health.”

“The harmful use of alcohol is especially fatal for younger age groups and alcohol is the world’s leading risk factor for death among males aged 15-59,” the report found.

In Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), every fifth death is due to harmful drinking, the highest rate.

Binge drinking, which often leads to risky behavior, is now prevalent in Brazil, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa and Ukraine, and rising elsewhere, according to the WHO.

“Worldwide, about 11 percent of drinkers have weekly heavy episodic drinking occasions, with men outnumbering women by four to one. Men consistently engage in hazardous drinking at much higher levels than women in all regions,” the report said.

Health ministers from the WHO’s 193 member states agreed last May to try to curb binge drinking and other growing forms of excessive alcohol use through higher taxes on alcoholic drinks and tighter marketing restrictions.

DISEASE AND INJURY

Alcohol is a causal factor in 60 types of diseases and injuries, according to WHO’s first report on alcohol since 2004.

Its consumption has been linked to cirrhosis of the liver, epilepsy, poisonings, road traffic accidents, violence, and several types of cancer, including cancers of the colorectum, breast, larynx and liver.

“Six or seven years ago we didn’t have strong evidence of a causal relationship between drinking and breast cancer. Now we do,” Vladimir Poznyak, head of WHO’s substance abuse unit who coordinated the report, told Reuters.

Alcohol consumption rates vary greatly, from high levels in developed countries, to the lowest in North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, and southern Asia, whose large Muslim populations often abstain from drinking.

Homemade or illegally produced alcohol — falling outside governmental controls and tax nets — accounts for nearly 30 percent of total worldwide adult consumption. Some is toxic.

In France and other European countries with high levels of adult per capita consumption, heavy episodic drinking is rather low, suggesting more regular but moderate drinking patterns.

Light to moderate drinking can have a beneficial impact on heart disease and stroke, according to the WHO. “However, the beneficial cardio-protective effect of drinking disappears with heavy drinking occasions,” it said.

One of the most effective ways to curb drinking, especially among young people, is to raise taxes, the report said. Setting age limits for buying and consuming alcohol, and regulating alcohol levels in drivers, also reduce abuse if enforced.

Some countries restrict marketing of alcoholic beverages or on the industry’s sponsorship of sporting events.

“Yet not enough countries use these and other effective policy options to prevent death, disease and injury attributable to alcohol consumption,” the WHO said.

Alcohol producers including Diageo and Anheuser Busch InBev have said they recognize the importance of industry self-regulation to address alcohol abuse and promote curbs on drunk drinking and illegal underage drinking.

But the brewer SABMiller has warned that policy measures like minimum pricing and high excise taxes on alcohol could cause more public health harm than good by leading more people to drink homemade or illegally produced alcohol.

I'm no Michael Bisping.

by SammyBeez on Feb 22, 2012 3:32 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

prohibitionists are the worst

you can’t nanny state your way out of the bad effects of alcohol and MJ

When I'm on the mic it goes down, CINTRON

-Joell Ortiz

by The Lethal Haze on Feb 22, 2012 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm no Michael Bisping.

by SammyBeez on Feb 22, 2012 4:33 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Nice comeback.

Can’t argue with that.

I'm no Michael Bisping.

by SammyBeez on Feb 22, 2012 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

All that said Prohibition doesn't work

So I fail to see your point despite your interesting facts.

Also the drinking age should be dropped to eighteen.

I’m out.

by discoandherpes on Feb 22, 2012 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

The issue is a lot deeper than legalization vs. prohibition:

My point is, there should be stronger deterrents put into place against something like alcohol that is clearly so damaging to a society—instead of just keeling over in supine acquiescence and saying “What the hell, people are going to do it anyway.” As narrow a stance it is to just advocate prohibition as a panacea it is also pretty shortsighted to think that just legalizing or allowing a potentially damaging substance/behavior is the solution as well—that’s my point. You don’t have to agree; it’s just the way I see it.

I'm no Michael Bisping.

by SammyBeez on Feb 23, 2012 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

The word deterrent is a dangerous one. It implies, to me, taking steps to create ramifications for using a substance you want to use. In fact, according to Wikipedia: “Deterrence is the use of punishment as a threat to deter people”

People need to make their own decisions. We should make it as easy as possible for those decisions to be educated ones, but there should be no laws against being willfully being self destructive.

Just because you think you know better then other people, doesn’t mean you should be able to control their lives.

by Sqwibbs on Feb 23, 2012 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, except for when self destruction impacts the society overall.

If someone is truly ONLY harming himself then that’s his business, but when that starts to impact society at large it becomes everyone’s business, IMO.

I'm no Michael Bisping.

by SammyBeez on Feb 23, 2012 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

You are actually falling victim to a logical fallacy that, coincidentally, was named during the prohibition arguments in the last century. You are basically ignoring the positive impact alcohol has on society (you’ve probably never even considered it), and only concentrating on the negative aspects.

The fallacy is called “If-by-whiskey:”
-———————————————————————————————————————-
The label if-by-whiskey refers to a 1952 speech by Noah S. “Soggy” Sweat, Jr., a young lawmaker from the U.S. state of Mississippi, on the subject of whether Mississippi should continue to prohibit (which it did until 1966) or finally legalize alcoholic beverages:

My friends, I had not intended to discuss this controversial subject at this particular time. However, I want you to know that I do not shun controversy. On the contrary, I will take a stand on any issue at any time, regardless of how fraught with controversy it might be. You have asked me how I feel about whiskey. All right, here is how I feel about whiskey:

If when you say whiskey you mean the devil’s brew, the poison scourge, the bloody monster, that defiles innocence, dethrones reason, destroys the home, creates misery and poverty, yea, literally takes the bread from the mouths of little children; if you mean the evil drink that topples the Christian man and woman from the pinnacle of righteous, gracious living into the bottomless pit of degradation, and despair, and shame and helplessness, and hopelessness, then certainly I am against it.

But, if when you say whiskey you mean the oil of conversation, the philosophic wine, the ale that is consumed when good fellows get together, that puts a song in their hearts and laughter on their lips, and the warm glow of contentment in their eyes; if you mean Christmas cheer; if you mean the stimulating drink that puts the spring in the old gentleman’s step on a frosty, crispy morning; if you mean the drink which enables a man to magnify his joy, and his happiness, and to forget, if only for a little while, life’s great tragedies, and heartaches, and sorrows; if you mean that drink, the sale of which pours into our treasuries untold millions of dollars, which are used to provide tender care for our little crippled children, our blind, our deaf, our dumb, our pitiful aged and infirm; to build highways and hospitals and schools, then certainly I am for it.

This is my stand. I will not retreat from it. I will not compromise.
-———————————————————————————————————————————
ps, I couldn’t get the block quotes to work right with multiple paragraphs so I just used the lines, is there some trick to it?.

Anyway, you should check out a neat little documentary called “How Beer Saved The World” which you can stream on Netflix instant. Obviously it should be taken with a grain of salt, but it is a pretty fun little film.

by Sqwibbs on Feb 23, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I've considered both pros and cons:

IMO the harm outweighs the benefit, however, this discussion has prompted me to want to do some research into the matter since it certainly is a controversial and hottly debated topic. I do have Netflix—thanks for the reccomendation—will check it out. Btw, with the block quotes when you hit the " symbol for the html tag type your quote after the tag and then to close it(so it doesn’t quote everything else afterwards), hit the " symbol again and then put a forward slash / before the word block between < and >. :)

I'm no Michael Bisping.

by SammyBeez on Feb 23, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

...aaaaaand "recommend"

getting OCD w/ my typo’s now ;)

I'm no Michael Bisping.

by SammyBeez on Feb 23, 2012 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I highlighted the whole thing and hit the " symbol, which placed the opening and closing tag around the whole thing. But when I hit preview, only the first paragraph was in a block quote, even though the tag was at the end of the several paragraphs. When I removed the extra spaces, it put everything in the block quote, but made it a wall of text. Weird behavior.

I guess the most important point I would like to make, is that while it is true that self destructive people use alcohol as a tool to be self destructive, those same people would be using something else to self destruct if they didn’t have alcohol to turn to. For example, right now there is an epidemic of prescription drug abuse. One of the big reasons for this is that it is socially unacceptable to be drinking at 11am, or when you are taking care of your children, but it’s perfectly ok to "take your medicine" any time of the day.

The unfortunate truth is that the vast majority of the people in the statistics you provided above would still find some way to self destruct even if we could wave a magic wand and make all the alcohol in the world disappear. The real answer isn’t punishing the millions of people who safely and responsibly enjoy alcohol every day, but looking at what causes those people to be self destructive in the first place.

by Sqwibbs on Feb 23, 2012 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, it's a very deep subject.

Especially once you get into all the other types of intoxicants and substances involved. It’s like having a discourse on the nature/problem of good & evil—there’s a lot to consider. Thanks for your input. :)

I'm no Michael Bisping.

by SammyBeez on Feb 23, 2012 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

‘major’? Somehow I doubt something that can be grown in your backyard could be more lucrative to organized crime than say something that requires heavy synthetic processing or has a physically addicting characteristic.

by Armleglegarm Head on Feb 22, 2012 2:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

if your backyard is the size of a National Forest, then yes it is hugely lucrative. the only additions you have to make are booby traps & armed guards. It’s called weed because it’s extremely easy to cultivate, basically requiring sunlight & H2O.

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 22, 2012 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Im guessing youve never actually grown Marijuana

Wayne Brady makes Bryant Gumble look like Malcolm X.

Follow me @Idonthaveatwitterbecauseitssupergay

by Negrodamus on Feb 23, 2012 6:20 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

How should I answer this on a public internet post? No, I have never grown marijuana. I may be paranoid, but I’m not stupid.

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 23, 2012 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Then you would know cultivating marijuana requires a lot more than just sunlight and water.

Wayne Brady makes Bryant Gumble look like Malcolm X.

Follow me @Idonthaveatwitterbecauseitssupergay

by Negrodamus on Feb 23, 2012 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

key word: basically

I’m not going to go into separating sexes, cross-breeding, or hydroponics on a board devoted to MMA, but growing can range from ditch weed to large scale professional hydroponic cultivation. Depends on what your quality needs are, but it does basically come down to sunlight & water…this plant will grow pretty much anywhere, hence the term ‘weed’. It’s not rocket science, it’s farming.

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 23, 2012 7:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I never understood this.

Arguing against legalizing weed because of a bad effect that comes from the fact that its illegal.

Horribly circular logic.

When I'm on the mic it goes down, CINTRON

-Joell Ortiz

by The Lethal Haze on Feb 22, 2012 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Gov't can't compete at this point

There’s more to it than most people realize. It would not be financially beneficial to the government.

Menckenstein:
(noun)
Definition: a traditional doll crafted from the stomach hair of obese, unkempt, typically diabetic men who suck at fighting. This type of doll is commonly crafted in the deep South and seems to be exclusively purchased by fans of the NBA franchise the LA Lakers, who believe the dolls give them the power to be as cool as Celtics fans.
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Feb 22, 2012 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

that doesn't address the circular logic at all

you brought up the point that MJ sales fund criminal organizations.

I brought up the point that MJ funds criminals by definition because its illegal. Whoever sells it, by definition, is a criminal.

That has nothing to do with if it would be financially beneficial to the government to legalize or decriminalize MJ. And even if somehow the government couldn’t tax the shit out of it, it would stop wasting money on policing what are currently MJ crimes. No more MJ arrests, trials, incarcerations- the government stands alot to save if MJ were legalized, even if I accept your premise that the government won’t make money off of MJ sales.

When I'm on the mic it goes down, CINTRON

-Joell Ortiz

by The Lethal Haze on Feb 22, 2012 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

they definitely can compete

it’s far easier to regulate industry than it is to regulate “the war on drugs”.

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 22, 2012 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't get how this is what you took away from the article.

The point here is that the NSAC is being lenient and giving Diaz the ability to apply for therapeutic exemption AFTER THE FACT. It has nothing to do with controversy, and everything to do with being fair and just.

There's no moral order at all. There's just this: can my violence conquer yours?

by ElliotMatheny on Feb 22, 2012 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Time will tell.

It sounds like they’re giving Diaz a real break here to me.

There's no moral order at all. There's just this: can my violence conquer yours?

by ElliotMatheny on Feb 23, 2012 12:56 AM EST up reply actions  

FREE NICK DIAZ

My daddy didn't come to my play in 2nd grade so now I do MMA.

by RandyCouture'sDivorceLawyer on Feb 22, 2012 2:35 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Free Karl!

My photography blog...check it out and tell me what you think.
Life Through My Lens

by ChillMike on Feb 22, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I think just asking for an exemption is going to be too much. Nick and his team should figure out a way to show that urine in his system doesn’t mean he’s high. If that means volunteering to have his blood tested at the fight, or convincing them that he (and other people with medical needs) need to use a different threshold to trigger a positive test, or something. I really don’t think “i have a card, i can have weed in my system” is going to work.

by Phildo on Feb 22, 2012 2:35 PM EST reply actions  

There's no precedent which may help him.

He also has a REALLY good lawyer. Like one’s whose mother holds a very high ranking government position. I believe Mayor of Las Vegas?

by Matthew Roth on Feb 22, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

He also has no precedent to help him.

This commission pulled Credeur out of a fight beforehand for Adderall, they have precedent that a prescription doesn’t mean it’s allowed, never mind a doctor’s recommendation, is not enough to allow someone to compete with a banned substance on their list.

He’s not going to get off for this time because instead of trying to work something out he tried to beat the system, and failed.

by Phildo on Feb 22, 2012 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

My guess is a temporary exemption

With the topic being discussed at the next ABC meeting.

by Matthew Roth on Feb 22, 2012 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I really don’t know why you would think that. This goes beyond the ABC, it’s on the WADA banned list, going further away from WADA standards opens a new can of worms.

I don’t understand why people want to treat weed differently from everything else on the banned list. It may be stupid that it’s there, but it’s there, some people thinking it shouldn’t be there isn’t really going to change much.

by Phildo on Feb 22, 2012 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

It is because most people use, so they are advocates of it. If they really step outside that box and really comprehend why it is on that banned list then they wouldnt be adament about the topic.

by KingLujan on Feb 22, 2012 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s on the WADA banned list as a substance you can’t use at time of competition. It’s not banned out of competition.

by Matthew Roth on Feb 22, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

The problem is that the established method of testing of the NSAC (urinalysis) does not show the timeframe of use, rendering that argument invalid in this case.

by Machiel Van on Feb 22, 2012 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

and it was in his system when he competed, and its now too late to show something else.

that’s why offering his blood or seeking approval beforehand are much better approaches than trying to dig himself out after the fact.

by Phildo on Feb 22, 2012 3:16 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

That’s not really relevant. Nick knew how the NSAC tested for weed, Nick failed that test.

That could have been relevant if he would have gotten an exemption beforehand, or suggested an alternate form of testing, or done anything besides, “i can beat the test, homie,” but he didn’t.

by Phildo on Feb 23, 2012 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

The way I read this

Kizer and everyone else is setting up a decision where they go easy on Diaz. It just feels that way to me. Kizer’s public comments sounded incredibly mild to me.

We’ll have to see whether I’m totally off-base, but here is my prediction. The next step is for Ceasar “The Enabler” Gracie to grovel in front of the commission and say he screwed up by not asking for the exemption, and then for Nick Diaz to stumble his way through a statement written by someone else about how he understands that he failed to file properly for an extension.

Again, we’ll see. But the stage is certainly set for this little theater production to happen.

by Lauren J Darkbloom on Feb 22, 2012 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Retroactive exemption? Why would Nick be allowed to do this and not other guys that have been caught recently for mishandling their exemption situation, such as Sonnen and Marquardt, etc. What makes Nick so special that he’s allowed to skip over his responsabilities?

by Shnak on Feb 22, 2012 2:40 PM EST reply actions  

TRT is performance enhancing. Nuff said.

by Armleglegarm Head on Feb 22, 2012 2:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Without pot, Nick is apparently a mess. So, for Nick, pot is actually performance enhancing. Nuff said.

by Shnak on Feb 22, 2012 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

He got busted for metabolites...

not for being high during the fight.

We’ll have to wait until the hearing for the details, but a bad weight cut resulting in a failed urine test for a substance no longer active in the bloodstream which would clear itself up in a couple days is in a different league than having substantially more artificial testosterone in your blood than is allowed going into a fight. It’s a big difference, especially when combined with his doctors recommendation.

by Bloody L on Feb 22, 2012 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Does anyone

Actually want to not see another Nick Diaz fight for a year? Well if we’re all in agreement then fine him, slap him on the wrist and continue on, business as usual.

by Armleglegarm Head on Feb 22, 2012 2:40 PM EST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

yep.whatever else you say about the guy, he's money in the bank.

it’s not fair, that’s true. Maybe you’vre heard about whether life is fair, though?

This is an oule.

by some schmuck in texas on Feb 22, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I wanted Thiago Silva to fight Rampage before he got caught with the whizinator… but because we wanted to see him fight Rampage, are you saying that he should’ve been given a slap on the wrist and allowed to fight regardless? That doesn’t make any sense.

by Shnak on Feb 22, 2012 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Thiago Silva's not money in the bank.

it’s not about sense, it’s about dollars

(SEE WAT I DIDD THAIR?)

This is an oule.

by some schmuck in texas on Feb 22, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I’m with you, pulling for him to beat this. The thought of Condit collecting dust and waiting for GSP’s knee to be 124.5% is just dreadful. Diaz/Condit 2 happening sometime this summer would be a godsend for the casual and hardcore fan of MMA as well as a financial boon to Zuffa and these two fighters. Although the first one fell short in terms of pure action, I could pretty much watch these guys fight ten times in a row and be content. Maybe toss a Penn/Condit or a Diaz/Ellenberger in there somewhere. I just want to make sure that GSP is at least able to stick the vault landing with confidence before he even thinks about returning to MMA.

by Charlie Custer on Feb 22, 2012 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Please Raptor Jesus,

Dont allow this to turn into another moronic “it’s just pot its totally harmless” debate. Thanks

Earl

Writing things on occasion @ Head Kick Legend.
Team Captain for Ruining Your Special Night. That's what we do.
I have claimed the team name "Apologizing For My Pornographic Past" for BECW Season 3
"Just call me the gals guide gal." - RolloTomasi

by Earl Montclair on Feb 22, 2012 2:50 PM EST reply actions  

Dear EM -

I’ll do what I can, but it looks like there’s already a legalization debate starting up, that doesn’t bode well,

Sincerely,
RJ

ps – HISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!

This is an oule.

by some schmuck in texas on Feb 22, 2012 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

your puny species has made it harmful


I made it, I should know

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 22, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

follow me on twitter @polyh3dron

by Rob Young on Feb 22, 2012 2:56 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

this is epic

f’n fantastic!

"There are no atheists in foxholes" isn't an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes. ~James Morrow

by F'n Clownshoes on Feb 22, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Awesome idea, piss poor execution

Menckenstein:
(noun)
Definition: a traditional doll crafted from the stomach hair of obese, unkempt, typically diabetic men who suck at fighting. This type of doll is commonly crafted in the deep South and seems to be exclusively purchased by fans of the NBA franchise the LA Lakers, who believe the dolls give them the power to be as cool as Celtics fans.
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Feb 22, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i don't think it's bad

the photo is awful but the lines are good and the shading is good. the scroll work and lettering could be better.

"There are no atheists in foxholes" isn't an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes. ~James Morrow

by F'n Clownshoes on Feb 22, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Definitely needs touch up

Menckenstein:
(noun)
Definition: a traditional doll crafted from the stomach hair of obese, unkempt, typically diabetic men who suck at fighting. This type of doll is commonly crafted in the deep South and seems to be exclusively purchased by fans of the NBA franchise the LA Lakers, who believe the dolls give them the power to be as cool as Celtics fans.
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Feb 22, 2012 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm 90% sure that he'll just end up being suspended 12 months.

All the arguments people are suggesting argue for a change in the rules, but none of them argue that an established rule wasn’t broken. The only reason I’m not 100% certain is that the NSAC is known for some circus acts, such as granting a license for someone fight when they are supposed to be in jail.

by Machiel Van on Feb 22, 2012 3:13 PM EST reply actions  

90% is valid, the inner workings of a state agency are a mysterious cabal.

But I’m glad NSAC is open to making concessions to allow medicinal use…Diaz is a catalyst for change!

Now on to judging criteria.

Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?
No holds barred, no time for move fakin,
Gots to get the loot so I can bring home the bacon - Charlie Brown

by tigerlee on Feb 22, 2012 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I'm working on the intricacies of details of maneuvers that he still doesn't even know the names of." - Frank Mir

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Light-Heavyweight - A Pending Crisis
Wario_small
BECW3: The Advent of Live Scoring & What It Means For Future Live Posts
Small
UFC 146: Lactic Acidosis (A Complete Breakdown)
Stansfield_small
One More Push For Ronda Rousey's Superstardom
Tatum_small
New MMA Rule: Auto-Deductions for Multiple Low Blows

Recent FanPosts

Small
Come to the Dark Side Jon Jones
Small
Daniel Cormier the only challenge to Jon Jones' throne?
Warrior_small
MMA Transaction Wire: May 11-17
Photo_on_8-30-11_at_10
MMA Gyms in Athens
Small
Big Fights Create Big Decisions
Image_9_small
Josh Barnett Tweets about his broken hand

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings

Yahoo_ufc_145