Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Report: UFC 142 Sells 225,000 Pay-Per-Views

Photo

UFC 142 sold 225,000 pay-per-view buys according to Dave Meltzer in the latest Wrestling Observer (subscription required). While low, this is quite a respectable number given the circumstances. Firstly the event was held in Brazil and the reduced domestic press coverage for overseas events always hurts business in North America. Secondly the card was headlined by a featherweight title fight between Jose Aldo and Chad Mendes and the smaller guys have yet to prove themselves as reliable PPV draws.

It's important to also note that Meltzer said some estimates of the numbers for UFC 142 were much higher than the reported number.

Let's look at the reported numbers for recent PPVs for comparison (all estimates per Wikipedia):

  • UFC 142 Aldo vs. Mendes 225,000 buys
  • UFC 141 Lesnar vs. Overeem 800,000 buys
  • UFC 140 Jones vs. Machida 485,000 buys
  • UFC 139 Shogun vs. Henderson 290,000 buys
  • UFC 137 Penn vs. Diaz 280,000 buys
  • UFC 136 Edgar vs. Maynard 225,000 buys
  • UFC 135 Jones vs. Rampage 520,000 buys
Meltzer adds some analysis:
It's appearing to be just slightly below where UFC 136 (Edgar vs. Maynard III) ended up and would be one of the lowest numbers in years, but all of that was expected, given it was not a strong marquee card and shows that emanate from outside North America generally do a lot worse. This would appear to be the UFC's current baseline number, since this show was from Brazil and was going against the Broncos playoff game. It did better in Canada and Australia. It's possible the late controversy regarding Anthony Johnson's weight called some late attention to the show and may have helped it slightly.

SBN coverage of UFC RIO 142: Aldo vs. Mendes

Comment 83 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It’s understandable. Too bad so many people missed out on an amazing card. Then again, the same can be said of the last one in Brazil.

A writer looking for a new home.
Part of Team Luke Thomas' Beard (LTB)
You may like Diaz, but Brock actually won a title that mattered.

by MicahtheCynic on Jan 26, 2012 1:00 PM EST reply actions  

Those are some sad numbers, they really are going to hurt this year without Brock and GSP

Damn your puffy guts, Brock!!!!

"Now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb."
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Jan 26, 2012 1:01 PM EST reply actions  

I was just thinking the exact same thing.

WIth GSP out injured and Brock now retired, the UFC have lost two of their biggest draws. The Jon Jones PPV are pretty decent, but I don’t think fighters such as JDS, Velasquez, Overeem, Edgar and Aldo have anywhere near the same pulling power as someone like Brock.

Hopefully, now there is TV deal with FOX, this will help to establish fighters with the casual fans.

http://www.katana-clothing.com/
Please check us out on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

by @KatanaClothing on Jan 26, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't buy it.

This was one of the first PPV in a long time that I neither paid for or went to a bar to watch. I was not interested and I wanted to watch the Broncos playoff game.

by Crazynutts on Jan 26, 2012 1:02 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Is Meltzer now including overseas sales in his estimates?

His original estimate for UFC 140 was around 440K domestic & 480K worldwide. Did he revise that? And by his comments that UFC 142 did better in Canada and Australia suggests that he is now including worldwide totals.

Follow me @heynottheface where I occasionally tweet inane comments

by John Nash on Jan 26, 2012 1:05 PM EST reply actions  

i got these figures from wikipedia

who cite Meltzer but I assume you’re correct and they include world-wide buys. my bad. thanks for catching.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 26, 2012 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

According to Bob Arum, this event did zero buys.

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 26, 2012 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Those numbers are just North America. Canada isn’t considered an international market like the UK or Australia. The 140 number was revised as he put up in his year end article on yahoo.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news?slug=dm-meltzer_pay_per_view_pacquiao_010412

by Dpez71 on Jan 26, 2012 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I realize that when he lists his North American estimates he is including Canada, but when explaining why it sold 225k he mentions that it was a foreign event, faced competition against football, and did well in Canada and Australia, as if they played a part in the sales.

And his year end article doesn’t make it clear that those are only North American numbers for every event. In addition, it’s odd that the new revised number would match his previous world wide estimate. And nowhere does he mention the number 485,000 which is what MMAPayout went with. Also this comment from MMAPayout
Buy Rate

Early estimations on the buy rate for UFC 140 by the Wrestling Observer have it at 440,000 buys in the US and 480,000 buys worldwide. This is a positive considering the UFC’s string of sub-400 PPV buys. It also shows that Jones is beginning to grow as a PPV draw. Jones vs. Rampage did 475,000 buys and it has improved if you take the worldwide buy rate.
Seems to suggest that UFC 135 actually did 475,000 in North America. I just want some clarity from Meltzer.

Follow me @heynottheface where I occasionally tweet inane comments

by John Nash on Jan 26, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

He specifies when discussing the Wrestlemania number saying it did 680k in North America and an additional 400k worldwide. Wouldn’t make sense to use domestic numbers for some events and worldwide on others on the same list.

The initial 440 domestic and 480 worldwide for 140 came from the newsletter that comes out 4 days after the event. They usually get revised later as it appears both Jones shows did a little better than originally expected.

by Dpez71 on Jan 26, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

SEG>Zuffa

Andre's Posse

by Anr on Jan 26, 2012 1:46 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Spectacle and social intrigue gets more eyes than legitimate, world-class competition. Ask Kimbo Slice.

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 26, 2012 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Kimbo Slice is UFC level

Andre's Posse

by Anr on Jan 26, 2012 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t be silly, there’s no UFC 142 competitor on a level with Fred Ettish and Remco Pardoel

by forkboy on Jan 26, 2012 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

They had to compete with Tim Tebow

That definitely played a huge part

by Hashmo on Jan 26, 2012 1:17 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Having a non-draw as headliner

With almost no star power other than Belfort played the huge part

Read my tweets or whatever - @SSReporters

by SSreporters on Jan 26, 2012 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Totally understandable number

If it was a card in the US, I imagine it would have done around 2.75

Its also an acceptable number because Zuffa is using it as a way to spearhead and build up a potentially HUUUGE brazil market. Got to spend money to make it.

It is unfortunate though that so few people saw the card. There were a TON of great fights and Barboza could have picked up some real steam in the US. That said, the steam was translated into Brazil where it may do even better.

by Cocytus on Jan 26, 2012 1:18 PM EST reply actions  

Giveaway too

Don’t forget they gave away free views on Xbox Live as an apology for UFC 141’s lousy stream. That’s how I watched it.

by Flashking on Jan 26, 2012 1:23 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

What the...?

How did I miss this?? Damn it

by BKdroid on Jan 26, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

That was only about 30k when all is said and done, though.

"Now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb."
Daniel James Miller Foundation - Please donate, every penny helps.

by menckenstein on Jan 26, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Which puts the total at a very nice 255,000.

"Computer being attacked by virus contracted from watching illegal japanese schoold girl porn. Bare with me." - Our Bovine Public

Captain of The Bus Feeders, Bloody Elbow Civil War, Season Two

by T.C. Engel on Jan 26, 2012 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I strongly doubt

That all 30K would have bought the PPV.

BECW Season 2 Captain of the Intellegent Northern English Picking Team - 80% more INEPT than all of you, 8 times out of 12
Please visit the Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by wonderfulspam on Jan 26, 2012 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah that is how I watched it

To have a Cannae you must have a Varo
-George Patton
"The complete man must work, study and wrestle."
-Aristotle

by T.P. Grant on Jan 26, 2012 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

So does this number include those who bought the card online from UFC.tv?

"If I wanted to spend a half hour between two hairy legs I'd go to your mother's house." -Don Frye

by mburtoni on Jan 26, 2012 1:26 PM EST reply actions  

When you go up against the NFL playoffs, you will lose everytime.

"If you think, you're late. If you're late, you muscle. If you muscle, you get tired. If you tired, you die. When you die is when you tap..."
-Saulo Ribeiro

by sklart on Jan 26, 2012 1:32 PM EST reply actions  

Shame

As it was the best UFC for as LONG as I can remember.

by taptomyarmbar on Jan 26, 2012 1:32 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

I remember Snowden not being impressed with the card

on twitter >.<

@TylerTreese on twitter
www.thatmmablog.blogspot.com/

by TylerTreese on Jan 26, 2012 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Really? I can't believe it

Snowden is not a writer known to say controversial stuff to stir the pot.

"To me in this sport, it’s fighting, it’s mixed martial arts, and I feel there’s too many athletes and not enough fighters…I think these people going in taking these sports enhancement drugs, they’re not real fighters, they’re athletes. I’m a fighter. I’m a real fighter. That’s all I did my whole life." - BJ Penn

by Triangled on Jan 26, 2012 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

For real?

That was a fucking awesome card, no doubt.

All finishes on the main card, when was the last time that happened?

by taptomyarmbar on Jan 27, 2012 5:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah it was great but then

I’m not afraid of entertainment that takes place outside of the US

by UncleMax on Jan 26, 2012 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Not bad at all

I was expecting it to go into the 100K mark since it was against the Tebows and the rest of the NFL playoffs

by HaterSlayer on Jan 26, 2012 1:33 PM EST reply actions  

The sky is falling!

An annoying Fitch fan.
Captain of Season 1 BECW Champs, the K-1 Level Predictions Team.
Season 2 Captain - Brock Lesnar's Cruelty-Free Pest Control

by Zachary Kater on Jan 26, 2012 1:42 PM EST reply actions  

This is what happens when you have too events (PPVs) in a short period of time.

UFC 141 – 12/31/11
UFC 142 – 01/14/12

Only a two week gap between two $60 ppvs in a time when everyone is recovering from holiday spending, and not only that, it did not have a strong promotion effort backing it since the UFC put most of their push behind 141. It also didn’t help the UFC with the fact that Jose Aldo wasn’t much of a draw yet, and Chad Mendes, while also not a draw, had only fought on prelims prior to his first headlining ppv event

UFC 137 – 10/29/11
UFC 138 – 11/05/11
UFC on FOX – 11/12/11
UFC 139 – 11/19/11

139 was that last in a row of 4 UFC events in 4 weeks, three of them being free. 139 also had sub-300K buys because of lack of promotion, and the audience simply being either burned out on watching UFC events at the time, opting to save their money for a later event, or had something else worth watching going on at the same time.

My main solution would be to cut ppvs back to the 11 or 12 per year like they had in 2009 and 2010. One ppv per month would give the UFC and appropriate amount of time to promote each event with the care they do for events like UFC 126, 129, and 141, leaving fans feeling deprived during the long breaks between each one. I don’t know about you guys, but the lack of ppvs last April was really refreshing and really made me excited to watch UFC 129 at my friend’s house. Right now, it’s hard to really look forward to a ppv because we get too much too regularly, like a person losing that great “pick me up” feeling from coffee after drinking them daily for a long time.

by amendamatrix on Jan 26, 2012 1:42 PM EST reply actions  

For real? where? I live in Flevoland, so I guess I would be inside of the regional coverage!

by Carlos Estrada-Ibars Martínez on Jan 27, 2012 8:14 AM EST up reply actions  

You have to order/watch online at ufc.tv

I’ve done it a couple of times now, never had any blackouts or problems. Only thing is, it’s not quite HD quality, but for only €5 I won’t complain about that :-)

by Chris P. Bacon on Jan 27, 2012 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

the ufc had 16 PPV events in 2011, only one more than they did in 2010, yet in 2010 they posted record numbers in PPV sales

i think over saturation is definitely a cause for the low PPV numbers, but i don’t think it’s the main problem. I think it has more to do with star power, and the changing of the guard.

In 2010 the UFC had GSP fighting twice, Brock fighting twice, they had the epic Rashad vs Rampage fight, plus they still had stars like Chuck Liddell, Anderson Silva and BJ Penn to round out the main events.

In 2011 the UFC only had 3 PPV events sell for more than 500,000 PPV buys and they were headlined by GSP, Anderson Silva, and Brock Lesnar. The only other fighter that came close was Jon Jones who headlined 3 PPV’s in 2011 for an average of 458,333 buys per event.

I think the major reason why the UFC had such a down year in 2011 is because their PPV’s were being headlined by guys like Frankie Edgar (who averaged less than 250,000 buys per event in 2011 ), Jose Aldo, Junior Dos Santos, Dominick Cruz who although they are the best in their respective weight classes they aren’t stars.

by darkotto23 on Jan 26, 2012 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

You're right, there were 15 ppvs in 2010. 120, and 122 were free overseas events on tape delay.

But still my point still stands, there shouldn’t have been more than 1 ppv per month in general, so 13 ppvs per year is more reasonable for me. Last year, February, August, and December each had two ppv events on them and one of those ppvs were almost always treated like an after-thought in the promotion efforts. Did the UFC need to have 127, 133, and 140 as separate ppv cards? I think Jon Jones could have gotten the exposure he needed if he was on the same card as Brock, and all of the other good fights from the those “unneeded” cards could have been shifted to events that needed 1 or 2 more good fights attached to it.

Hopefully this network deal goes well and Fox pays more for UFC content 7 years from now so the UFC can start earning enough revenue on ad-supported events to run less ppvs.

by amendamatrix on Jan 26, 2012 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree that a 1 PPV per month system would be ideal, but they still aren't going to sell big #'s until they build new stars

You mention that they had 2 PPV’s in December of last year, but since they were headlined by big names (Lesnar, Jones, and Machida) they were both successful (800,000 and 480,000).

For example, in 2010 the UFC held 2 events in may (UFC 113 & 114), and 2 events in August (UFC 117 & 118), yet all 4 events were successful (520,000 & 1,050,000 – 600,000 & 570,000 buys respectively) because they had stars (Machida, Rampage, Rashad, Anderson, BJ Penn).

Remember the run the UFC was on from UFC 111 to UFC 118? They held 8 PPV’s (plus the Free cards the strikeforce shows, and the WEC shows) in 6 moths yet they were all extremely successful (721,250 avg) because of the big names.

I think in the end the casual fans care more about the big names than they do about how often the PPV’s are happening.

by darkotto23 on Jan 26, 2012 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it would be easier to build stars if those prospective stars like JBJ fought on the same card as Brock or GSP, instead of flying solo.

Lesnar - Out for nearly all of 2011 due to TUF and diverticulitis
GSP - Fought once in April, waited 6 months to fight again but severely injured at the last minute. He’ll likely have 0-1 fights in 2012 due the recovery.
Rampage - only fought twice, but one of those fights was against a non-contender in Matt Hamill, and there wasn’t enough “beef” between him and Jones to match 114’s numbers.
Silva - Silva is not a big draw unless he has a high profile feud with his opponent. Silva-Belfort and Silva-Sonnen fits the bill, but Silva-Okami brought things back to reality about his drawing power. Note: big draw as in drawing ppv buys.

I think the UFC should consolidate their bigger fights on to fewer ppvs and up the buy-rates on already strong cards. If I had the option to get 500K-700K buys on one event versus < 350K buys from two different cards, I’d take the single event that can potentially hit in the 500K-700K range because I won’t have to spend twice the amount of money promoting, securing venues, paying fighter’s travel , and other expenses the UFC regularly has for every event they put on. This would be good for everyone, even Dana since he won’t have to travel nearly as much and stress himself out like he usually does.

One more thing, GSP fought on UFC 79, UFC 87, and UFC 100. What do those three cards have in common? GSP, after being a Jon Jones level ppv draw since winning the title the first time, piggybacked on cards featuring far greater draws than himself such as Chuck Liddell and Brock lesnar. UFC 94, had GSP in a rematch with LW champ BJ Penn that was hyped as much as Rampage-Evans was, and drew a lot of attention from casuals. After those 4 ppvs, GSP has now been headlining ppv cards for the most part on his own, and he’s now doing 700K+ every time now. I think there is a formula to making an exciting champion a GSP-like star, you need to have that champion, for example Jon Jones, piggyback off of headliners like GSP, and Lesnar as much as possible, and hope he puts on beautiful performances under the biggest spotlight possible. After the champion has had time in the spotlight, promote the hell out of any legitimate rivalry he may have with another contender and treat it like it is the biggest grudge match of the sport with a creative promotional angle so that the outside media, like ESPN, will be actually interested in covering it. Jon Jones already has Rashad Evans as a good rival, should he beat Phil Davis, but Jones should have previously been featured on a BIG card like Lesnar-Overeem or co-main eventing UFC on FOX 1.

by amendamatrix on Jan 27, 2012 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

i agree with all you're saying

except the whole part about anderson not being a star.

I think anderson is a star. Ever since UFC 101 where he demolished Forrest Griffin, in my eyes Anderson has been a star, and his PPV sales have proved it. He has sold over 600,000 PPV’s in every event (held in north america) that he has headlined since 101.

Yes, it’s true he gained even more exposure from the Sonnen and Vitor fights, but he was the main attraction, people tuned in to see him. You don’t see Chael or Vitor pulling off the same numbers they did without Anderson. Chael was part of UFC 136 and that PPV even thou it was stacked still sold low numbers. The same with Vitor at 133 and at 142.

After years of Dana promoting Anderson as the best in the world, i think it’s hard to deny that he’s a star. After brocks retirement, he might even be the UFC’s 2nd biggest star.

BTW the reason why i don’t include PPV’s held outside the US and Canada is because they tend to sell abnormally low numbers despite who’s fighting in the card.

I wrote a fanpost about it after UFC 134

http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2011/9/2/2401514/analyzing-ufc-ppv-sales-in-events-held-outside-north-america#storyjump

by darkotto23 on Jan 28, 2012 4:03 AM EST up reply actions  

What kind of license fee does Zuffa get for the Brazilian TV deal?

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 26, 2012 1:54 PM EST reply actions  

Depends on the market, for example ESPN UK pays roughly $10,000,000 a year.

Don't follow in my footsteps I walk into walls

by MattParker117 on Jan 26, 2012 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice info. Source? Just curious. I’ve always wondered about the value of their international TV deals.

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 26, 2012 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't have a number

But I have to imagine the Brazilian TV deal is significantly more lucrative, given the much larger market and greater prestige of the networks involved.

Proud member of The Voices in Paul Harris' Head, BECW Season 2.
"By doubting we come to inquiry and by inquiry we perceive the truth." -- Abelard

by Patrick Wyman on Jan 26, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

it's also in a market with a much much lower per capita income

meaning that the advertising sells much cheaper than ads do in the US or UK

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Nate Wilcox on Jan 26, 2012 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah true

But isn’t ESPN UK pretty minor league compared to its US counterpart? I had a basic cable package when I lived over there a couple of years ago, and it definitely didn’t come with ESPN. I don’t know if things have changed since then or not, though, so I could be totally wrong.

Proud member of The Voices in Paul Harris' Head, BECW Season 2.
"By doubting we come to inquiry and by inquiry we perceive the truth." -- Abelard

by Patrick Wyman on Jan 26, 2012 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Johnson’s weight issues helped the card! Rehire this man, he’s apparently good for ppv buys.

by Hardcharger on Jan 26, 2012 1:57 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

The faster the PPV model can die off, the better. This is my opinion.

by Pyrgz Krum on Jan 26, 2012 2:02 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

ppv will never die off.

by bigdmmafan on Jan 26, 2012 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

It could if Zuffa could make more on TV rights fees than PPV. That may never happen though.

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 26, 2012 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont think it will

The best we can hope for, imo, is for the amount of PPV’s to go down to about 4-6 per year.

by bigdmmafan on Jan 26, 2012 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I think

This is eventually what will happen (say 3-5 years); presumably they’ll end up putting more events on the main Fox network, support it with FX and Fuel, and then do a few mega events on PPV (New Year’s, Memorial Day, 4th of July, etc.). The PPV model is much simpler, and the UFC’s infrastructure hasn’t really caught up to the increased demands and complexity of the network TV deal, but eventually I have to believe that they’ll shift their focus.

Proud member of The Voices in Paul Harris' Head, BECW Season 2.
"By doubting we come to inquiry and by inquiry we perceive the truth." -- Abelard

by Patrick Wyman on Jan 26, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Dana and the Fertittas still made good money off the show.

Andre's Posse

by Anr on Jan 26, 2012 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Still can’t believe 136 did so poorly. That card was stacked.

Follow me on Twitter or Pat Barry will try to bring back the Dougie! @BVandDietPepsi

by BVandDietPepsi on Jan 26, 2012 2:11 PM EST reply actions  

Many, many, MANY more casual fans than hardcores. These kind of buyrates show you that people like BE users are just a small minority of overall “MMA fans.”

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 26, 2012 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Even to a casual, it should have done 150k more than 142. I mean, Chael vs. Stann was pushed back to #3 on that show.

Follow me on Twitter or Pat Barry will try to bring back the Dougie! @BVandDietPepsi

by BVandDietPepsi on Jan 26, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Casual fans didn’t know about that fight though. You can’t expect casuals to go out of their way to follow the UFC’s schedule: if they hear about a fight in non-MMA media, they’ll look into it. Otherwise? It’s like it didn’t even happen. Methinks you don’t understand just how “casual” most casual fans can be.

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

PS: Melvin and I say: Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Jan 26, 2012 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

136 might be my favorite card ever.

"I have reached an age when, if someone tells me to wear socks, I don't have to."- Albert Einstein
Follow me on Twitter if you like MMA, baseball, and moderately funny people: @TimBernier31
INEPT coming for the season 2 BECW title.

by Tim Bernier on Jan 26, 2012 4:18 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I hereby admit to being wrong

My psychic prediction was 175k views. I was wrong.
I’d like to take this opportunity to apologize to all my fans.
I’m sorry.
-“Psychic” Octopus

with fiery Dornish peppers

by Psychic Octopus on Jan 26, 2012 2:40 PM EST reply actions  

That’s awful

Follow me and I'll follow back.

by Psychic Octopus on Feb 13, 2012 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

what?

Follow me for fun facts, discussion topics, predictions, drunken rants!

by Psychic Octopus on Feb 13, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

thats actually pretty dam alright for that card and alot better then most all though. Meltzer on his show was almost sure it would not even get close t0 200K

by Shocbomb on Jan 26, 2012 3:00 PM EST reply actions  

Dam ! one day BE will pop in a edit option,should read most all thought not though

by Shocbomb on Jan 26, 2012 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I think UFC should look at putting Aldo’s, Cruz’s, and Edgar’s next title fights on FOX to help get them more exposure. These guys have been putting on pretty good fights, they just need the exposure. Aldo seems to be catching on in Brazil pretty well, so UFC can always count on him to headline a show down there as long as he remains champ.

Overall this isn’t a bad number, all things considered (Aldo not being a household name, a monster NFL game). Some people thought it would do under 200K, so I think UFC will take this for right now.

by dpk875 on Jan 26, 2012 5:28 PM EST reply actions  

Pretty good number considering it was in Brazil.

At the end of the day it doesn’t matter, because growing stars in Brazil on television is far more important to the UFC than a single PPV.

by discoandherpes on Jan 26, 2012 6:20 PM EST reply actions  

Way to Many UfC Pay Per Views!

Zuffa and co. need to cut back some on the almost bi-weekly UFC events. Have they ever heard the old adages familiarity breeds contempt, absence makes the ….,too much of a good.etc,etc? Many of the pay-per views are getting watered down.

by Hankverdee on Jan 27, 2012 12:17 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

sigtest

I would have a horseshoe surgically implanted in my ass just so Brock would pull it out and beat me over the head with it while I pleasure myself.

Please visit the
Daniel James Miller Foundation and donate.

by Machiel Van on Feb 1, 2012 11:42 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I'm working on the intricacies of details of maneuvers that he still doesn't even know the names of." - Frank Mir

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chilli_pickle_283g_hot_small
Junior Dos Santos' Worst UFC Win is Stefan Struve
Wario_small
BECW3 UFC 146 Recap & Live Post discussion
Wario_small
BECW3 UFC 146 Live Post
Madmen_icon_small
Dan Hardy: The Outlaw (Short documentary film)
Me_2_small
Farewell Frank Mir

Recent FanPosts

Small
Rafael Lovato Jr. on Open Mat Radio
Small
The Most Valuable Non-UFC Fighters
Small
USA chants during ufc fights!?!?!?!?!?
220px-johnnycash1969_small
Fighters you aren't sold on ?
Small
Duane Ludwig's chasm...ouch
Rousimar-palhares-picture_small
An Appeal to SBNation
Lebowski_excited_grin_small
Top 5 Potential Replacements for Vitor Belfort Against Wanderlei Silva
Obp_small
Help me get a job

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings