UFC 141: A Look at Failure in Sports and How the Public Responds
What is failure within a combat sport?
Is it losing in the dying moments of a five round title fight that you spent twenty-four minutes dominating? Is it losing a decision to one of the best in the world? Is it waking up and seeing the referee looking down at you with concern? Is it being forced to accept you no longer have anything to offer at the elite level? Being outpointed by a sparring partner? Missing opportunity after opportunity?
Wherever the goalposts for success are set, it should be clear that there are infinitely more ways to screw up than there are to succeed. A hooking left can land on your chin the instant before yours on his. A bob instead of a weave leaves you in the face of an onrushing shin freighted with bad intentions and terrible velocity. Waiting an instant too long means fighting off a takedown against the cage all round long - instead of implementing your own gameplan. There comes a moment when fighters fail, when their bodies do not respond to commands, when their concentration stutters and sparks or when every decision leaves them further mired into the quicksand that leads to a Loss - one defined by others beyond their own brains and entered into their permanent record.
The way fighters face this dementor-like specter varies - much like our own responses to more mundane failures - becomes an individually unique calculus of physical sensations and emotional attachments to their families, careers, self-belief, combat sports and public/private identity.
The positive response to that idiosyncratic combination is apparently the "heart" that defines champions, the "fuel" that drives a comeback to the top of the mountain and the "noble competitive spirit" that allows athletes to risk Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy and other lifelong debilitating ailments for hunks of plated metal and cereal box covers.
The negative response to such things by an athlete prominent in the public eye is somehow ridiculous and something worth heaping every iota of scorn that can be possibly be mustered. A decision to quit, to move on or to say that the rewards are not worth the risks cannot be sane or sporting. We expect our fellows humans to always dig deep and do superhuman things. Not measuring up to that ideal can mean the redaction and rewriting of an athlete's legacy and an opinion rendered: "You were never that good."
The same stuff that happened to Ricky Williams is happening to Brock Lesnar. He can't walk away in peace or take the sport on his own terms. The vocal public feels the need to arbitrate that process. Yet, the fighter alone deals with professional and personal success being possible - or even probable - within a few months all disappearing down the gaping void of a Loss at the hands of a better fighter.
All of the other fighters who lost on the UFC 141 card are sitting somewhere and wondering how deep do they have to go within themselves to fix those bad habits or the weakness that lost them the fight. How they bounce back will be a microcosm of how all combat sports athletes deal with failure. How we treat them should reflect how we view failure in our own lives.
The best - and perhaps only - way to improve is by failing. High, loud and repeatedly. Stringing together random syllables until first words are spoken. Tennis racquets whiffing on those fuzzy neon green ovoids. Staring blankly at an electrical engineering diagram. Most of the time, we fail in practice - which for a professional mixed martial arts means tapping out to chokes, getting pinned by better wrestlers or being outpointed by the local stand-up badass. They are able to take these micro-failures, internalize them to learn the lessons taught and move past the negative aspects of not succeeding because the goal posts of success have been moved to the fight night that they are training for. The little failures are the means by which the end is accomplished and the ring or the cage will be the stage where successes and failures are determined by a fighter, by the judges and by the audience at large.
Which is why things get so emotional when someone takes a Loss. What the training leads up to and what Fight Night turns out to be can diverge from one another in a fashion that can really mess with heads. Earlier this year, Randy Couture retired on the spot after Machida sent his tooth flying and his consciousness winging into the Temporary Black Hole of Unexpected Sleep. Matt Hughes, an unquestioned legend in the sport, is taking time off to assess things after Josh Koscheck unceremoniously knocked him out. B.J. Penn, one of the baddest men to ever walk the earth, has no idea when or if he'll return to the cage after Nick Diaz swiped that third round from him.
Only Penn has received anywhere near the criticism Brock Lesnar has gotten and will receive for stating that he wants to walk away from the sport with a 5-3 professional MMA record, a UFC title belt and millions of dollars after being summarily dispatched by Alistair Overeem. It seems that the perceived waste of extraordinary talent is a worse sin of omission than any of the more mundane committed sins by other athletes or public figures. People just can't stand someone not doing as well as they think that person could and if that person walks away from the sport while they're still performing at a high level, the gods help them. The reactions seem to split evenly between complete bemusement or violent backlash. We've seen this elsewhere in sports with Marvin Hagler, Barry Sanders and Ricky Williams.
Hagler retired because Sugar Ray Leonard wouldn't fight him again. The man was 33 years old and probably could have beaten everybody else in the division at the time. But no Sugar Ray fight that year? Marvin was gone. He's never looked back either. Barry Sanders faxed his resignation to the Wichita Times in 1999 and that was that. The most electrifying running back in NFL history stayed home with barely a word said and his health intact. Nobody understood him, but the overall public opinion seemed to settle in a grudging respect for that decision - much like they did with Hagler.
Williams had a far different set of reasons for walking away from football - some of which were drug testing-related - yet he took an unbelievable amount of flak for saying that the sport of American football and the rich financial rewards that went with being a star running back were not worth it anymore for him. Winning a Super Bowl title or being named Most Valuable Player were not the things that Ricky wanted. Williams eventually worked his way back into the NFL, but he did it on his terms and with the creation and refinement of support systems that allowed him to stay happy. He also took an enormous amount of negative public commentary, dealt with constant questioning and probably wished he was good at and famous for something else less close to the hearts of vitriolic fans at least a bajillion times.
Why do the vocal members of the public not learn from these sporting sagas? Why is Lesnar being treated more like Ricky than like Hagler or Sanders? Losing in swift and violent fashion to one of the elite fighters within the heavyweight division should be small cause for shame. Alistair is Sagat personified. Lesnar has had eight fights, with perhaps the hardest string of opponents any MMA fighter has ever attempted - despite Paulo Thiago's best efforts - and he won most of them. Dominated a couple too. If I had the analogous success in my grappling pursuits, I'd be pretty happy. Going 5-3 against people like Marcelo, Leo, Pablo and Kron? I'd take that in a heartbeat, retool and keep trying. But I am not Lesnar. I do not know him. I have not experienced what he has and will go through.
We outsiders do not know the individual calculus Lesnar is using, how much weight he attaches to each and every thing and person in his life. What that math tells him, and tells all the other combat sports athletes taking a break, is something we can only guess - and probably very, very badly - at. Respecting that decision to leave and moving on in a mature fashion yields only benefits.
Let Brock Lesnar walk away in peace.
Maybe he'll come back rested and ready - if the math feels right.
41 comments
|
12 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very, very necessary piece.
I fall into the camp that thinks Brock cringes under fire, but I also understand that if he doesn’t like getting hit and walks away from the sport because that’s what makes him happy, more power to him.
The Machiavellian.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 1, 2012 10:06 AM EST reply actions
I'm oin teh camp...
that a lot of people have been crushed by Cain’s punches (and Carwin’s, too) and bigger men have folded after an UberKnee, let alone four of them.
Let’s not forget the LEVEL of competition he was facing in those times of adversity.
"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King
Proud member of Trainyard Sleepers, BECW: S2
We're gonna win, you know. Stats lie.
by duck on Jan 1, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Great work Thapa
I think we have some extra discussion points for the show tonight now.
If you're looking for the most intelligent mixed martial arts discourse, check out InStrength.com!
by Brian Hemminger on Jan 1, 2012 10:13 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
awesome piece, also good picture
¬_¬
by ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ on Jan 1, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions
well done Ben
there is an inherent selfishness that comes with being a sports fan. We watch sports to be entertained an don’t like when something gets in the way of that. And if we feel an athlete is wasting talent and denying us from something greater, we pile on as if BJ Penn was the only one who could decide if he would be a great or not on a given night like flipping a switch.
Each athlete has their individual drives and goals in a sport and once those goals are accomplished and the drive spent, it is time to walk away. And nobody should decry somebody for not being a lifer in their sport and holding on till the bitter end like a Chuck Liddell or Tito Ortiz. Athletes, especially young athletes, tend to see success in their sport as the biggest, most important thing in their lives, but as they get older, get married and have a family their perspective changes a bit. Brock Lesnar got a big old slice of perspective with his illness.
Lesnar accomplished great things in this sport in a short time. He won the title, defended it, changed the very nature of the heavyweight division and breathed life back into it. He isn’t the greatest of all-time but I think he came to terms with that already.
To have a Cannae you must have a Varo
-George Patton
"The complete man must work, study and wrestle."
-Aristotle
Given his illness
I think it’s pretty amazing he was able to get himself back into the same kind of physical condition he was beforehand, or very close to it. Mentally I don’t think he was ever the same after the first bout of diverticulitis.
Terrific piece
Very well-written.
The only negative emotion I can muster in response to Brock’s decision to retire is disappointment. Not necessarily disappointment in Brock himself but more sort of rueing the fact that we won’t see him compete again.
BECW Season 2 Captain of the Intellegent Northern English Picking Team - taking INEPTitude to new levels!
I don't mind Brock walking away
I respect the first 5-2 of his record, and acknowledge his accomplishments.
That said, I felt like he quit before he ever got to the cage last night. I feel like he showed up last night for a paycheck with the intention of quitting at the first excuse to quit. I’m also not particularly enamored of the idea that he wanted to win the belt back and then retire.
Brock Lesnar is walking away to a beautiful wife, tens of millions of dollars (maybe more, who knows), and his own ranch. I have a hard time feeling sorry for him suffering a hit to his legacy that took place at least partly of his own volition. If he suffers a bit of media scrutiny over it, and people speculate about whether he was a quitter, or whether he will be remembered for his dominance in the cage, that’s part of the game in sports. Nobody would’ve blamed him if he walked away over his illness.
So while your piece is appreciated, and your points are well-made, I’m not not going to waste much sympathy on a man who, in spite of his illness, has a pretty good life. When you step into sports, you step into the public eye, and Brock didn’t always work overly hard to endear himself to his spectators. I’m not saying he owes that to anyone, but neither does the public owe him anything either.
Part of selling yourself as a commodity (and make no mistake, Lesnar made a lot of money doing it) is that people can discuss and speculate about you. Your legacy, your potential. I don’t think most of the talk of Lesnar is that out of place or inappropriate.
That said, I also hope he comes back someday. The man had so much talent that I do have an earnest wish to see what he could’ve done given time to live up to it. It’s unfortunate that diverticulitis prevented him from doing more with the time he has spent in the cage.
I'm not allowed to respect his wins
Unless they’re in the UFC?
by Scott Whitaker on Jan 1, 2012 1:16 PM EST up reply actions
His only good wins are inside of the UFC.
by discoandherpes on Jan 1, 2012 1:32 PM EST up reply actions
True
But it’s his first fight, so I respect it even if it was a weak opponent. You can’t begrudge someone who rose up as fast as Brock his one win against subpar opposition. Really, we’re splitting hairs here.
by Scott Whitaker on Jan 1, 2012 2:41 PM EST up reply actions
records are records regardless of where they happened.
We aren’t going to start removing wins and losses from people’s records based on where they happened. That’s just silly. Everyone starts somewhere JDS has a loss shall we change his stats on that as well?
I can't figure out how to add the twiiter follow button so here's a link -____-
Follow @GabeMadridNYC
by Papercut Elbow on Jan 1, 2012 7:15 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
agree completely with this post
Its hard to respect the Brock that fought on Friday when you look at the Brock in his previous fights. His aggressiveness was completely gone.
Reed Harris is thinking, “Sable is so fucking hot. What the hell does she see in that amazing success story that is BROCKLESNAR?”
by Holls Hoyce on Jan 1, 2012 11:00 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Excellent complementary piece to the other Lesnar retirement articles. The one thing that sticks in my mind is that I’m sure he doesn’t give a shit what anyone else thinks about his choice. I hope he doesn’t cause it takes a thick skin and strong confidence to deal with the scrutiny and praise of fame.
by Inspectorxr5 on Jan 1, 2012 11:02 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I know the brock lesnar retirement was the biggest thing coming out of that event but can a guy get a few Overeem op-eds from his favorite mma writers :) just sayin!
by nastyem on Jan 1, 2012 11:08 AM EST via mobile reply actions
there is gonna plenty of time for that with JDS out injured
To have a Cannae you must have a Varo
-George Patton
"The complete man must work, study and wrestle."
-Aristotle
Understood. I’ll do my best over the coming weeks to make an Overeem op-ed as rock solid as his vast pectorals.
Twitter: @DefGrappler
InStrength dot com.
better nurse that article on horse meat Ben
To have a Cannae you must have a Varo
-George Patton
"The complete man must work, study and wrestle."
-Aristotle
Remember when fighters didn’t have to have near spotless records to still be considered elite? Now that the talent pools are much deeper then the early days it seems that taking a loss has more consequence then it once did. If you’re lucky you can get 3 fights in a year and still not be back to where you were before your loss. If you have any injury in that time you’re looking at likely 3+ years of your career to get to the top.
Lesnar had the luxury that the Heavy weight division is much more shallow then the rest and he was able to stay in the mix as long as he could get a win. Now that he dropped two I just don’t think he wants to fight for another 2 years to get back to the top. Plus he could also just being honest with himself about his abilities and doesn’t think he can develop enough to compete with the elite strikers.
It depends on who you lose to.
If you lose in the top 10, it’s pretty much the same thing as murdering the viewers pet. If you lose in like the top 25, ala Pat Barry and Dan Hardy, people just like kind of go, “Let’s give him another chance!” MMA fans are overly critical, and probably some of the harshest I’ve seen. And this coming from a football fan.
My opinion>Your onion.
by Tairy Hesticles on Jan 1, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
Don't be silly
If Lesnar won two in a row after the Overeem fight he would be fighting for the title again.
by discoandherpes on Jan 1, 2012 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
he would've fought for the belt against JDS
If he won the belt he stated he’d be done if he lost hed be done. So basically he wanted to retire with the belt or get another payday
I can't figure out how to add the twiiter follow button so here's a link -____-
Follow @GabeMadridNYC
by Papercut Elbow on Jan 1, 2012 7:18 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
I don't begrudge Brock his exit from the sport
but I also don’t see the need to leave him in peace. Hagler and Sanders both had much more complete careers than Brock, and Ricky has taken more shit than Brock will ever have to deal with. Part of the unwritten contract you agree to as a professional athlete is that your decisions are going to be scrutinized. Brock is a big boy. He can handle it.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
BECW Season 1 - The NOT LAST PLACE Team Spinning Fish
BECW Season 2 - WAR Cecil Peoples Champs
by Dave Strummer on Jan 1, 2012 11:47 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Great piece ... terrific analysis
But you know, a fighter actually WON that bout, too. His name is Alistair Overeem.
This happened when Cain beat him as well. Most of the commentary space was taken up by writers and commenters discussing the meaning of the loss. (Ditto for Fedor, BTW. I didn’t see much about Werdum and Silva’s victory over him.)
It’s like a self-fulfilling prophesy: we wonder what Brock’s MMA career MEANS and in doing so we actually generate meaning. But under the surface, is there really very much to discuss?
Yes, but I feel it’s more to do with how his presence impacted the business of MMA, rather than his actual performances in the cage. (5-2 is too small of a sample, and the HW division is, as nearly everyone will admit, has been historically thin). What he has meant to the UFC’s brand, it’s ability to generate big gates and PPV numbers cannot be understated. Don’t get me wrong: he needed high-profile fights (if not high-profile wins) to get there, but he brought fans to the UFC from another entertainment medium (WWE). Some of those new eyes are probably now dedicated MMA fans. Some probably slunk away when he wasn’t on the card. But he kept a certain type of casual viewer interested in MMA enough to build something like a “base.”
I think that base is weakly construed and it may not last. The FOX deal will mean more to the UFC in the long run. One face, one match, one personality, cannot and will not make the UFC a mainstream spectacle over the long haul. it’s what the promotion does in the aggregate that matters. Some of that stuff may not be as immediately interesting .(TUF in other countries. Developing a flyweight division. Using Strikeforce to develop talent) but White and company seem to have the long view.
Parting shot Brock will be remembered as the most important fighter of the past five years. Not the best. But definitely the most important. His legacy will be that.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
Mohandas Gandhi
"The fight is won or lost far away from witnesses - behind the lines, in the gym, and out there on the road, long before I dance under those lights."
Muhammad Ali
"If MMA is like dog fighting, those are some pretty fucking smart dogs."
"I don’t want to lick any butt."
GSP
by jackbox on Jan 1, 2012 11:48 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
“But under the surface, is there really very much to discuss?”
It’s all about pageviews. Lesnar’s name generates them. I’m not trying to be cynical, but this is the reality with 50% of the Lesnar articles posted in the MMA media space.
MMA as an industry will miss Lesnar.
For those who have been MMA fans prior to Lesnar’s appearance little has changed.
You write to be read. I never understood the idea that it’s wrong to want pageviews. I want people to read my shit.
And everyone on staff knows they can write whatever they want.
Managing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Jan 1, 2012 4:19 PM EST up reply actions
Good Point but...
There are a lot of differences between writing to be read with provocative pieces and writing for page views, and they can overlap but… writing a straw man argument or ad hominem attack that you don’t really believe because you know it will generate the views is different than a critical analysis of something based on your real thoughts. I think this is well documented in the larger sports media complex, especially on sports talk radio. There is a great demand to read, watch, and talk sports. Sometimes there aren’t enough topics to fill that, or the market is saturated with people repeating the consensus. So we need grist for the mill, and you (general you) take a controversial position just to take a position, to generate ratings, differentiate your content or brand, etc.
Now I am not saying that is what is being done here, rather I am discussing your statement in general. And I think that there is a difference in quality and a value in authentic positions over assumed positions. This difference is why I read this site- I feel that there are many good, original, and authentic positions here, an attempt to describe reality as opposed as an attempt to exploit trending topics.
In addition, (continuing on the page view motive) Gawker media provides a good example, although the example I use will possibly be totally out of context for this forum. Gawker operates Jezebel, an ostensibly feminist website. It generates and cultivates a post-feminist readership. But periodically they bring in guest writers who post pieces that the editors know will completely offend their readers, and generate enormous buzz spikes as the topic gets spread to other content generators in the same demographic. This exploitation of its own readership in this way is to me highly offensive, and while that is also not what is going on here, is a solid example of how writing just for page views is a bad thing. Anyways, I went a bit astray here, but I have been thinking about the nature of discourse and sports and meaning lately as I am reading Foucault again. Peace.
For the recod, Ricky Williams is having a quietly productive year for the Ravens with absolutely no drama
We love him as the backup to Ray Rice.
"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King
Proud member of Trainyard Sleepers, BECW: S2
We're gonna win, you know. Stats lie.
by duck on Jan 1, 2012 12:34 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
This article is awesome!
Filipino Reccing Machines
by mlzybaby on Jan 1, 2012 12:45 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Here's My Beef With This Article
You assert that the public is uneducated. “When will the public learn from these sporting sagas…” As if everyone’s negative attitude toward retirement is ignorant. The article is pretty much saying as outsiders we shouldn’t judge a man’s personal decision so mind your own business. I know this is a crude reduction, but it could be viewed that way.
I agree with you that sweeping the entire public under such a hypothetical umbrella is a bit off. However, I do believe this phenomenon of excessively negative and ignorant self-appointed “Justices of What is Right” is not a purely mainstream media manufactured one, created just to fill dead hours of television or radio.
There is a very vocal segment of the population that rips big time on athletes and other public figures for arbitrarily established sins of omissions or non-achievement that the “haters” have come up with. It’s one thing to be disappointed. It’s another to completely trash Lesnar’s life, family and achievements as some are doing. The man is a flawed star within MMA and he achieved quite a bit in a short time.
It’s entirely possible to criticize him and others while being fair and respectful of their human right to make a decision about their career pursuits. But that may not sell as much as Skip Bayless’s grumpy old curmudgeon act…
Twitter: @DefGrappler
InStrength dot com.
by Ben Thapa on Jan 1, 2012 5:47 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
We sure love to see people fall
It’s an unfortunate by product of our culture in these United States. Look at how many people seemed to get off on Tiger Woods’ fall. I am actually impressed by the numerous commentators who left their Haterade in the fridge to give Les-Nar his due. I will miss his big ass, that’s for sure. But then, as my name would lead you to believe, I am a mark for Pro Wrestling, as well. I can’t blame a fighter for retiring if their heart isn’t in the game anymore. As a longtime boxing fan, I’ve seen it too often. As we look to the future of this ever-evolving sport that is MMA, it is definitely bright, with so many young talents, and genuine badassery, let us remember that in the end, they fight for money, as well as pride. Hopefully, all MMA fighters in the UFC will see large enough paydays so that they don’t have to fight beyond their prime. This is my first post on this awesome site. Hopefully I haven’t rambled on for too long. Have A Nice Day!
Honestly I believe he walked away before this fight
Looking at the fighter he was on Friday, versus the fighter who beat Mir to a pulp two years ago, I can see why he decided to retire.
I’m kind of surprised he wouldn’t want that third Mir fight.
Bitch.
by timetosaygoodbye on Jan 2, 2012 12:40 AM EST reply actions

by 























