With TUF on FX UK is UFC on Sky Sports Inevitable?
A little bit of news that got lost during the Ultimate Fighter Season 14 conference call the other day was Dana White announcing the season would air for the first time on the FX network in the UK. The show will air on Thursday evenings less than 24 hours after the show airs on Spike TV in America which is significant for a couple of reasons: the previous TV deal for airing The Ultimate Fighter on FIVE USA (part of the Channel 5 network) meant UK fans had to wait until the following Tuesday to see the most recent episode, and the move to FX sees The Ultimate Fighter broadcast for the first time in High Definition. FX in the UK also benefits from being within the first 30 channels structured on the Sky Digitial Satellite platform (channel number 124, where 101 is the first channel available) making it relatively easy to find compared to FIVE USA (channel number 174) in the Entertainment section.
With such a quick turnaround in getting a new deal for TUF to air in the UK that works out better for the fans, the Fox-UFC partnership continues to pay dividends early on. But what does this have to do with UFC coverage possibly moving from ESPN UK to Sky Sports in the future? For that we need only look at the career of David Hill, Chairman of Fox Sports.
Working for Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation in the 1980's, Hill helped launch Sky Television and Eurosport in the UK in 1988. In 1990 when Sky Television and British Sky Broadcasting merged, Hill became the head of sports programming and development and formed Sky Sports. For a sports network to succeed especially one on a premium subscription service Hill quickly realised the importance of securing broadcast rights to Premier League Football (Soccer), the most watched sport in the UK. Similarly Fox Sports success on the big Fox network and FX more than a decade later hinged on securing broadcast rights for the NFL. In other words the success and lessons learned with Sky Sports then has helped with the success of the Fox Sports division now.
The Sky platform is still part owned by Rupert Murdoch - his son James Murdoch is the current Chairman of Sky - who recently tried to acquire full control of Sky in a buyout because of the millions of pounds profit it had been generating. As of April 2011 Sky's operating profit for the business year had risen 24% to £790 million - about $1.23 Billion.
Owning a respectable 39.1% slice Murdoch's attempted takeover was thwarted when his public and business image took a pounding from the Phone Hacking and News of the World scandal with repercussions and consequences still emerging now.
David Hill is still one of Murdoch's right hand men in the Television Media world and with UFC's desire to work with Fox globally a move to Sky Sports would make sense. Dana White also hasn't been shy about feeling slighted by ESPN America at times when it comes to minimal news coverage of the UFC even if the two entities seem to kiss and make up soon after a public falling out.
While the deal with ESPN UK in 2009 included full coverage of events that included The Ultimate Fighter, ESPN has since been scaling back its coverage by dropping future seasons of TUF and opting out of airing Versus cards - including the most recent one headlined by the UK's Dan Hardy in what many thought could be his last fight with the promotion in a do or die battle with Chris Lytle. Worse still due to a technology issue with the digital 'freeview' platform live UFC events watched on ESPN outside of Sky, Virgin Media and BT Vision would be cut short when the service shut down at 5am local time - just 2 hours after a UFC event would typically start until the most recent decision to start UFC events an hour earlier stateside.
Sky Sports has had 20 years to establish itself as the dominant sports destination in the UK with ESPN trying to play catch up but combined with the entertainment channels Sky offers including it's flagship channel Sky One in addition to FX, Sky has more resources to help the UFC grow in the UK. If we're already seeing cross-promotion of the UFC via segments during NFL and MLB games on Fox it stands to reason Sky Sports is capable of offering similar cross-promotion with its Soccer, Rugby, Cricket and Tennis coverage.
UFC has attempted to work with Sky in the past though, having some old programming air on Sky Sports in the run up to UFC 38: The Brawl At The Albert Hall in 2002 that aired on the Sky Box Office Pay Per View platform. A disappointing buy rate combined with a Zuffa run UFC that was still three years away from its break through first season of The Ultimate Fighter lead to UFC coverage being dropped and bounced around other PPV outlets or as a tape delayed option on second tier entertainment channels such as the now defunct Bravo (the UK Bravo having no relation to the US Bravo) before finally landing with the ill-fated Setanta Sports and then on to upstart ESPN UK. While Sky Sports had been in negotiations for UFC coverage when Setanta Sports went into receivership it was speculated that the WWE's presence on Sky Sports as well as Sky Box Office PPV acted as a barrier for the UFC getting a deal done. But now UFC have a long term partnership with Fox we may see a deal get done with Sky when ESPN's broadcast rights are up next year.
Editorial Update: The Ultimate Fighter season 12 Team GSP vs Team Koscheck did air on Sky Sports 2 the following Tuesday, but the next season with Team Lesnar vs Team Dos Santos was not picked up by Sky Sports. A last minute deal was reached with ESPN UK to air the season.
15 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
ESPN never had TUF
Plus they were only broadcasting the prelims and Versus cards as the UFC offered them for free and dropped them once a price was attached. The deal with ESPN expires in August and it would not surprise me to see a deal with Sky such as:
TUF/TUF UK-Sky 1
Live Fights-Sky Sports
Sky shut down there sports PPV operations recently so PPV probably won’t happen here.
http://unintelligentdefense.blogspot.com
Part of the initial deal with ESPN
Was to show The Ultimate Fighter Heavyweights season but it ended up on FIVE USA instead. ESPN Classic has shown older seasons of TUF.
Bloody Elbow Grappling Editor.
Follow me on Twitter @KJGould
Like me on Facebook
Also
Last season was on ESPN, Team Lesnar ve Team Dos Santos.
Bloody Elbow Grappling Editor.
Follow me on Twitter @KJGould
Like me on Facebook
To be honest I’d probably be pretty happy if the UFC went to Sky Sports and I think the UFC would much prefer it too. I only have ESPN for the UFC and I don’t watch it for a whole lot else. I’d rather pay for Sky Sports instead of ESPN, it has a much broader range of programmes and also has 4 channels. I think the UFC would prefer it beause Sky would promote it much better I think, and has much more name recognition than ESPN in the UK
Proud to be the second pick of the draft for the K1 Level Predictions Team
Expert practitioner of the question mark pick
The UFC moving to SS certainly seems logical for all involved. As others have said, I too decided to pay for the monthly ESPN subscription pretty much solely for the fact they had the rights to all live UFC events. They within the past few seasons, have started to take on alot more Premiership games, however I doubt the number of UK subscribers increased greatly due to the fact that most of the Premier Leagues “top four” and the biggest games of the season (Man U Liverpool/Chelsea etc), are all shown on Sky.
By moving to SS, the UFC immediatly reaches are wider audience purely down to the fact that far more people have the channels. When you order the sports package, you obviously get Sky Sports. ESPN is a seperate subscription. Advertising throughout Premiership games (much like the fox deal during MLB etc) would also be huge.
As for PPV, I can’t see it ever taking off here. The only PPV events on Sky are boxing events that involve Amir Khan. Even the likes of Mayweather, Pac man etc are free with the Sky Sports subscription. All Strikeforce events are available via PPV on a sports channel that popped up a matter of months ago with no advertising what so ever. Strikeforce also isn’t advertised what so ever over here, so I can imagine the buy rate being abysmal if i’m honest.
"Honestly, I've got nothing against Josh Koscheck personally........but the guy's just a dickhead"-Paul Daley
WWE is also on PPV
The lesser PPVs are shown live on Sky Sports, but the big ones like Royal Rumble and Wrestlemania are PPV. It’s been like that for as long as I can remember so it must be a successful system.
So, I think down the line UFC on PPV would be possible in the UK. I wouldn’t think it’s popular enough at the moment though.
I completly forgot
About the WWE being on PPV. Is it only recently that they have re-introduced putting certain “PPV” events on SS1? I would be interested to know why because I was under the impression that every monthly event was now PPV on Sky. Maybe, there was a case to be made that they weren’t hitting their numbers and they’re attempting to encourage people to buy the PPV’s by offering some of them for free.
Either way, it’s just something that has never taken off in the UK. I’m sure the UFC would love to be on PPV in the UK every month but I don’t see it as being something that happens in the near future. As I said previously I was shocked that Strikerforce events, a promotion that will be known to very, very few besides the “hardcore” MMA fans here in the UK was being sold on PPV, through a channel that nobody has ever heard of. I didn’t even know Primetime existed until I searched the internet thoroughly to find if there was anywhere I could watch the HW GP. They were selling the whole tournament for £25 I think which isn’t expensive, but like I said, I don’t think anybody knew the channel even existed.
"Honestly, I've got nothing against Josh Koscheck personally........but the guy's just a dickhead"-Paul Daley
Interesting read
The Hill connection is something I wasn’t aware of. Either way, its pretty clear that UFC coverage could do pretty decent numbers in the UK, and I would expect a major deal somewhere along the line to be in Zuffa’s strategic playbook
Head conductor of the Charles Oliveira hype train.
Sky Sports is much better than ESPN
Sky Sports averages much more viewers than ESPN. It also has its own news channel (Sky Sports News) that runs 24 hours and averages more viewers than ESPN does.
So, it’d not only be moving to a more popular network, and that more people have, but it’d also be promoted better on Sky Sports News, and other sports shows like Soccer AM.
interesting. But damn, the title was a riddle I had to read 12 times to get.
Seraldo Babalu
by Skoobs on Sep 21, 2011 11:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I dont want it to leave espn, but thats for my own selfish reasons. Espn is way cheaper than the sky sports package, plus im a big fan of the nba so it was ideal for me.
With that said however, the coverage on sky sports would be great and especially if sky sports news gives it media coverage, it’d be more likely to take off here
by Silvio Dante on Sep 22, 2011 5:53 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Great article KJ
Well researched and informative. The move to Sky Sports would be a beneficial one, for sure, but I’m worried they’ll try to jump to PPV. I think the only way they could get it on PPV is if Bisping has a championship match. Even then, a lot of the general public would just remember him from his stint in that crap soap opera, Hollyoaks.
by Holls Hoyce on Sep 22, 2011 5:55 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Thanks for the props.
Bloody Elbow Grappling Editor.
Follow me on Twitter @KJGould
Like me on Facebook
Bring back the Bravo style of programming !!!
It was free, which is the most important factor to me!
I always sky+ UFC and watch it on the Sunday anyway so a tape delay wouldn’t bother me.
Plus they had TUF too so there was no confusion as to what channel, time etc it would be on.
Only problem was they rarely had fight nights.
Resist Much, Obey Little.

by 



















