A Revealing Epic: Pay Per View Buys - 2010 vs. 2011
In 2010, the UFC's total amount of PPV buys amounted to 9.3 million. This year, so far, the UFC has registered 3.6 million PPV buys. Now just looking at it with that framing, it looks like a huge drop off in PPV interest...almost devastating. But a closer examination proves that it may not be so horrible after all.
To start off, there is a difference of 5.7 million buys. We have 6 PPV events left this year: 134, 135, 136, 137, 139, and 140.
To match last years numbers, which were the biggest of any year, so it's hard to expect another increase, each remaining PPV needs an average of 950 thousand buys per card. That won't happen. Realistically, it's not feasible. It is a fact that 2011's total buys won't match or surpass 2010's
But comparing the numbers as of August to the total numbers from last year is sort of slanting it negatively. A more accurate comparison would be the current numbers for this year vs the same point last year.
Relying only on rough wikipedia numbers, I'll tabulate the UFC buyrates through this point last year. I'll stick with the previously reported 3.6 million for this year.
2010 PPV buys as of August 21st - 6.015 million
2011 PPV buys as of August 21st - 3.6 million
Now that is a big different, but not the staggering difference that the full 2010 numbers vs the incomplete 2011 numbers show.
An interesting note, for the remainder of the year from this point, 2010 had 5 PPV events while 2011 has 6 PPV events. That means 2011 will have an extra edge in catching up PPV wise. Because for the rest of the year, it has an extra PPV event.
Now, from this point to the end of 2010, there were 3.2 million more buys(per wikipedia numbers). To see just how much the rest of 2011 can potentially catch up, I think it's simplest to match up the PPVs remaining this year with their corresponding events from last year, according to similarity in event occurance.
UFC 134(August 27th) vs UFC 118(August 28th) - 128 did 570 thousand buys. Anderson Silva's last 2 headlining events did more then that. In fact, from 112, to 117, to 126, the # of buys for Silva's events have increased over the last event. Silva headlining with Forrest Griffin in the co-main drew 725 thousand buys. Both men won at that card. I imagine pairing them up in the main and co-main again could provide the same strong results. Silva vs Okami 2 is a weaker main event then Silva-Belfort, but Griffin vs Shogun 2 is a stronger co-main then Griffin-Franklin. I would also bet that the whole 'Rio' aspect will generate a small bit of extra interest as well.
Conclusion: UFC 134 outperforms UFC 118 by a fair amount.
UFC 135(September 24th) vs UFC 119(September 25th) - 119 did a fairly crummy 295 thousand buys. 135 is headlined by the light heavyweight title fight between Bones and Rampage. I really don't need to give any reasons why UFC 135 will smash UFC 119. Title fight between guys with fairly well-sized names and a noteworthy undercard. Bones and Rampage's last headliners both outperformed 119, the two together will have no problem generating more buys together then they could do alone.
Conclusion: UFC 135 outperforms UFC 119 easily.
UFC 136(October 8th) vs UFC 120(October 16th) - 120 was a free event and thus had no buys. UFC 136 is essentially the 'extra' event in the schedule this year. So it's buyrates will essentially all be a bonus towards closing the gap with last year. It certainly does help that UFC 136 is an absolutely stacked card with two title fights and a big #1 contender match. Trilogy fights sell, multiple title fights sell, a name like Florian fighting for a title again sells, an outspoken character like Sonnen vs a war hero like Stann sells, and a KO machine like Guillard battling Lauzon to secure himself in the title picture sells.
Conclusion: Obviously there is no competition buyrate wise, but 136 will be a well performing card.
UFC 137(October 29th) vs UFC 121(October 23rd) - 121 did just over 1 million buys. The only person capable of coming close to matching what Lesnar does is GSP, who is headlining this card. His last headliner did 800-900 thousand buys. Nick Diaz is a much more exciting, popular, and compelling fight for GSP then Shields. On top of that, 137 is a stacked card, with a big #1 contender match between Penn and Condit.
Conclusion: UFC 137 falls short of UFC 121's buys, but not by a whole lot. In the wider scale, the buys of 136 and 137 together, the two October PPVs of 2011, will definitely outdo the PPV buys from 121, the sole PPV in October 2010.
UFC 139(November 19th) vs UFC 123(November 20th) - 123 did 500 thousand buys. Velasquez vs Dos Santos for the heavyweight title is a much better main event then Rampage vs Machida for contendership. #1 contender fight between Bowles and Faber will also help out. The promotion of this event during the first Fox card should also help.
Conclusion: UFC 139 outperforms UFC 123 be a fair amount.
UFC 140(December 10th) vs UFC 124(December 11th) - 124 did 785 thousand buys and was headlined by GSP. We know nothing of UFC 140, but we do know it will not be headlined by GSP or Lesnar, for that matter, who is returing in the new year. The only rumor is the mumbling of Overeem being signed to headline this event in a #1 contenders match. No telling how that might draw, I would think pretty good, but not GSP good.
Conclusion: UFC 140 doesn't do quite as well as UFC 124
Final Thoughts - 2011 has an overall stronger final 3rd of the year then 2010, making up for some of the ground lost earlier in the year...but not enough to catch up completely. 2011 falls short of 2010's total PPV buys, but not by an embarassing amount at all.
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Seems fair
The’re not going to have another million-buy pay per view this year, but I’m predicting solid 700-800K events for at least 4 of this years remaining events.
by Colin Paul Kowlessar on Aug 21, 2011 11:34 AM EDT reply actions
agree
The only event with even the slightest hope of getting close to 1 million is 137…that’s if they promote the hell out of it, and the matchup itself can actually generate some above average hype. Hopefully when Diaz starts doing promo stuff, he’ll say some things that hype up the fight a bit.
The fact that they are giving it the primetime treatment can’t hurt either, but that’s common practice for GSP.
I still say it doesn’t hit 1 million though.
PACIFIC RIM
in theaters
July 12th, 2013
by Chris Groves on Aug 21, 2011 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Def…GSP-Diaz is going to be the biggest event of the year, but even with the Primetime treatment, I just can’t see it crossing a million. A true test of how the heavyweights draw without Lesnar in the picture will be seen at 139 though. Hoping for 750K, but wouldn’t be a bit surprised if it made a lot less.
by Colin Paul Kowlessar on Aug 21, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Same
Velasquez was primed to get some of Lesnar’s hype when he smashed him, but sitting out a year probably killed any hopes of that. Dos Santos has stayed active and in the limelight though. I think with the right promo, their fight could be pretty big. I’m expecting it to get plugged in a big way on the Fox card too, which should be able to help.
But I would be happy with a solid 600K or so.
PACIFIC RIM
in theaters
July 12th, 2013
by Chris Groves on Aug 21, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know
I think that maybe, maybe Rio can pull just over 1 million, or close to it.
Let the fighters fight, let the referees ref, but dear God, don't let the judges judge.
Great predictions
The numbers for 134 are going to tell us a great deal about what we can expect for the rest of the year; if that card can’t generate a high buyrate, then we have a problem.
Why not just compare average PPV buys per event? If the sport is growing as so many seem to think, the average should be going up regardless whether one or two main event guys more are injured this year than last. The fact is that the average is drastically down.
This year they’re averaging 400K buys per event. Last year as of this date they were averaging 600 K per event. That’s a drop of 50%. That’s awful by anyone’s definition.
Their PPV buy rate is tied directly to the presence of a handful of big draws at the top of the card. After Anderson and GSP fight this year, that’s it for the year.
.....
Get on board the Jake Train® . Next stop: Fight Night 25® Winner's Circle!
600 to 400 isn't a 50% drop
200K is 1/3rd of 600K, that’s a 33.3% drop
But I’m simply loooking at the rest of the year.
Last year was strong particularly because they weren’t just relying on a few big cards. From UFC 111 to UFC 118, they did not have a single event that had less then a 500K buyrate, and there were more then a few events without their big draws in there.
The bottom line is that people were comparing the TOTAL amount of buys from last year, the all time high year, to the numbers this year had gotten so far, with 6 PPV events remaining.
Yeah, 9.3 to 3.6 is a huge drop off. But 6 million guys to 3.6 isn’t as bad. My point was that by the end of the year, the difference between the total numbers of buys for the two years won’t be that bad. It’s all about perspective. There are some big cards coming up, there are more PPVs left this year then there were last year at the same point…so lets not start ‘examining’ how crappy this year did PPV wise before we actually see how the rest of the year plays out.
And yeah, it is important to consider the drop outs, because this year it has been huge.
125 – Originally to feature Edgar-Maynard and Aldo vs Grispi, two title fights would have helped it perform a bit better
130 – Originally to feature Edgar-Maynard 3, an anticipated rematch, as the main event.
131 – Was going to feature Brock Lesnar against Dos Santos, the match that had been built up with TUF, in the main event
132 – Was originally going to have Fitch vs Penn 2 in the co-main event. Being headlined by Cruz-Faber, this event needed a strong undercard to the headliner
133 – Was originally going to be Evans vs Davis and feature Franklin vs Lil Nog…we lost both of those and all we got was Evans vs Ortiz.
134 is the first card in a LONG time that has not been tarnished in one way or another.
PACIFIC RIM
in theaters
July 12th, 2013
by Chris Groves on Aug 21, 2011 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks for correcting my math there. I was going the other way (400 to 600) and erroneously assumed a 50% decrease when viewed the other way. Still significant, but not as glaringly bad a drop in buys.
I guess we’ll see how this plays out. My gut feeling is the big draw cards – GSP, Brock, and Anderson – are the outliers. Put in any of the weight class champions as main event guys and I’m betting you’ll see the average number of buys is, indeed, lower than they were last year for cards not featuring the big three. I’m pessimistic about the PPV model having any long lasting growth potential or even any real staying power at current levels, but even if they average 300K or 400K per fight they’re still making major bank.
.....
Get on board the Jake Train® . Next stop: Fight Night 25® Winner's Circle!
by Scabby Knuckle on Aug 21, 2011 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I think eventually PPV will be faded out
It will be a LONG time before they stop PPVs altogether…but I have a feeling next year that we will see fewer PPV events. We’ve been getting 14-16 the past couple of years. I think we’ll get fewer, but collectively more stacked, PPV cards next year.
I mean, this year between Spike and Versus, we’ll have gotten 10 free events. 2 TUF finales, 3 Fight Nights, 1 UK card, and 4 Versus cards. Next year, between FX and Fox we’ll be getting 10 free events. 2 TUF finales, 6 fight nights, and 4 Fox cards.
So I think as far as PPVs next year, we’ll get 10-12…but the average amount of buys will be quite a big higher thanks to the increased popularity gained from FX and Fox.
PACIFIC RIM
in theaters
July 12th, 2013
by Chris Groves on Aug 21, 2011 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm still not sold that Edgar/Maynard 3 does well
Nobody saw the first fight to see how great it was, Edgar and Maynard are still pretty much non-stars and the injury layoff has probably killed some of the buzz. As awesome as Aldo is and as big of a name Florian is, it’s still a belt that a lot of fans probably don’t even know exists. Then Guillard is awesome, but is he going to sell pay per views? There’s no precedent for something like that. And Sonnen isn’t the pay per view machine people pretend he is and Stann still isn’t established enough in the division.
We’ll see how it plays out. It’ll likely be my favorite card of the year, but I don’t know how much mainstream appeal it has.
Contributor at cagepages.com Come check us out.
Head Kick Legend
I'm not saying it'll be huge
And yeah, individually none of those fights are a big deal. But a card with Edgar vs Maynard 3, Aldo vs Florian, Sonnen vs Stann, and Guillard vs Lauzon…I think all of those together can make for more then a solid buyrate.
Last time around, even some hardcore fans found it hard to care about Edgar vs Maynard…but now all of us at least care about it.
A lot of people saw Aldo and Hominick’s great fight at 129…and Florian is a much more well known challenger then Hominick, so I say that’s a decent sized matchup.
Sonnen isn’t some huge PPV generator, he’s not an epic draw…but he is a well known figure in MMA, perhaps more so after his 117 performance then before. All the red tape he got involved in kept him in the headlines, as well as his constant stream of memorable quotes and ‘trolling’
Stann isn’t big, but he’s certainly at his biggest and most promotable now, coming off of 3 great wins in the MW division.
And Guillard, well, his last two fights have been brutal knockouts that were on free TV…there is no telling that he has developed into a draw by any means, but I’m sure having him on the card will generate a decent amount of interest.
Altogether I’m confident it will perform solidly.
PACIFIC RIM
in theaters
July 12th, 2013
by Chris Groves on Aug 21, 2011 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I’d say the formal extrapolation for this data is that 2010 was just a really good year. Hopefully not the high water mark of the UFC PPV revenue in general, but UFC 100 was a pretty big deal and created a lot of fervor that carried onto the later cards in the year.
2011 given the numbers is not as hot, but the cards are also not as good in terms of big names and promotion. I think 2012 will be better than 2011 but not as good as 2010.
It's just a world, it's just a life.
This is what I’ve been thinking for a while when reading all of the “sky is falling” nonsense.
And, for anybody who still thinks that the popularity of MMA or the UFC isn’t growing based solely on pay-per-view buys, you need to realize that pay-per-view buys are not the determining factor when answering the growing popularity question. Fight fans make purchasing decisions based on their excitement level for the particular fight in question. The fan base could be growing, but if the fights aren’t as compelling (i.e., title fights, stars fighting one another, stacked cards) then people simply aren’t going to buy as many fights.
On top of that, there is a recession going on with significant unemployment. When fights are $55 a pop, people will pool together their funds more often with more people involved, head to a bar, or otherwise watch the fight outside of their individual capacity in greater numbers than when the economy is doing well.

by 



















