Rios vs. Antillon and Williams vs. Lara Showcase Both Sides of the Boxing Coin
I talk about boxing a lot when there's down weeks in MMA news. Maybe it's a waste of time, but to me it's no different than talking about grappling or kickboxing. While I do push the idea that the sport is far from "dead" and that it is a lot healthier than many people realize, there are significant flaws in the sport's structure and it's only fair that on a down news day I cover some of the less than ideal stuff.
Tonight sees HBO and Showtime go head to head. While Showtime's main event sees what is likely to be a fight of the year contender between Brandon Rios and Urbano Antillon, HBO will show Paul Williams in what should be a "gimmie" against Erislandy Lara. Fantastic boxing site The Cruelest Sport's Carlos Acevedo offered a brief glimpse into the contrast between the two bouts during his preview of Rios/Antillon:
...this has the makings of a rousing shootout. Contrast that to the Paul Williams-Erislandy Lara bout on HBO-heads up against Showtime-another Ross Greenburg/Kery Davis lost lunar landscape production intended to advance obscure agendas. Ostensibly, narrative continuity and branding are the reasons for many of these HBO head shakers, but if no one cares, why bother perpetuating manufactured storylines? In a simpler world, boxers would be matched based on competition, compatibility of styles, and public interest. With avaricious promoters, rapacious managers, shadowy advisors, and shifty backroom athletic commissions, boxing has enough troubles without networks playing cloak and dagger as well. With Rios-Antillon, two hard-bitten lightweights, we get to see a fight put together solely because of its potential as an explosive and competitive event.
Alec Kohut of Max Boxing followed up on this idea in his fantastic look at how Paul Williams' desire to fight the best is being wasted by HBO's agenda based matchmaking:
So the questions to ask this week have little to do with the actual fight but more about the state of boxing and the business of boxing in America. Why is this obviously lopsided mismatch being carried as a main event on a premium network? Why is an exciting fighter like Paul Williams virtually unknown to the average American sports fan? Because love him or hate him, Paul Williams is an action fighter, win or lose. Wouldn't it have been great if either Wladimir Klitschko or David Haye were willing to take the risk Paul Williams does when he fights?
...
We are deprived seeing these "throwback" fighters more often who, if given the opportunity, would fight more and would fight on platforms that would expand boxing's popularity and bring much needed exposure to the sport, drawing more young gifted athletes toward boxing. Just minutes after suffering the knockout to Martinez, in the post-fight press conference, Peterson said of Williams, "This kid's a fighter; it's what he does."
And Williams wants to fight. When asked last week who was on his radar, he quickly responded, "Most definitely, I have Martinez back on my radar. I'd love to get another fight with him to prove to myself and my fans that he didn't deter me from fighting him because he knocked me out. I respect him for that. I feel I'll knock him out next time." Like before, Williams remains willing to go to the weight where the fights are, "If I get a top-of-the-line opponent, like a [Manny] Pacquiao or [Floyd] Mayweather and I have the time, I'll be there. I'll eat a few bread cakes or rice cakes. I walk around at '56 or '57 and have to put on weight for these fights."
Williams isn't the kind of guy looking to play it safe, despite suffering a brutal knockout to Sergio Martinez in his last fight (video of the KO after the jump) he wants to be fighting. Instead, he sat on the shelf waiting for HBO to find a slot for him. In the Max Boxing piece we see Williams' manager say that they'd have liked him to have a "stay busy" fight rather than sitting on the shelf waiting for a fight that isn't likely to represent much of a challenge.
Tonight we'll see both sides of the boxing coin. The relentless action that represents what boxing can be will be on display on Showtime while on HBO we'll see an exciting star as one of his prime career years is wasted sitting on the shelf killing time before a bout against an opponent who isn't in his class.
Guess which network earned my eyes tonight?
Paul Williams KO'ed by Sergio Martinez:
25 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Brent quit trying to convince me that boxing isn't dead
If you want to know what I think go to HeadKickLegend.com
Managing Editor of HeadKickLegend.com
Follow me on twitter @HeadKickLegend
by Matthew Roth on Jul 9, 2011 1:10 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
Huh
I think Lara has a pretty decent shot in this fight.
His career has certainly stalled
but he’s an accurate, tricky southpaw against a high-volume guy coming off two bad results, the last of which was an absolutely brutal KO.
I agree
I’d pick Williams, but Lara is a very sharp counter-puncher with good defense.
I was just pointing out that Lara really shit the bed in that fight.
"Run and tweet THAT, homeboy."
Gotcha
Lara’s problems to me are mental, particularly in pulling the trigger. I do like this fight…a lot can be said about where both guys are.
Open eyes are always freaky...

@scb0212
The Machiavellian.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Jul 9, 2011 1:16 PM EDT reply actions
I honestly thought Sergio killed him
lets hope his chin isn’t gone and isn’t shell shocked.
People do not like to think. If one thinks, one must reach conclusions. Conclusions are not always pleasant.
- Helen Keller
MMA is stepping on other people's dreams to reach your own.
- Roxanne Modafferi
I thought the same thing. I figured he was leaving on a stretcher. He left himself so exposed with that wild looping left. Reminded me of a Liddell bomb.
by troutki on Jul 9, 2011 4:44 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Thats the look we re all going to have in the moment before death.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.--Sun Tzu
To have a right estimate of a man's character, we must see him in misfortune---Napoleon Bonaparte
by younghispanic on Jul 9, 2011 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Last year
Erislandy was one of the top prospects in the sport. He was an amateur world champion in 2005.
The fight with Molina made him look bad, but he’s got textbook technique, good speed and defense with some decent power.
I wouldn’t write him off completely, but Paul is too tall and rangy for him IMO. As a counter-puncher, Lara is gonna have a hard time reaching him. They’re both southpaws, too. Its should be fun to watch at least.
"Run and tweet THAT, homeboy."
Paul doesn’t always use his reach to his advantage though. For someone so tall for the division, he’s a surprisingly good inside fighter as well.
I’m a fan of Williams, but he his defense leaves alot to be desired. Even before Martinez killed him, Kermit Cintron was landing alot of clean shots on Paul before Cintron inexplicably launched himself out of the ring.
Unless Paul has developed a better defensive gameplan, I think Lara has the skill to counter him because Paul won’t use his range as he should.
by StillUnknown on Jul 9, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You raise some really good points, but I see him fighting on the outside after that KO.
If he stays inside, he’ll basically even the odds for Lara. Erislandy defends and returns fire so well, I can’t see Paul winning that fight.
Cintron inexplicably launched himself out of the ring.
Hilarious.
"Run and tweet THAT, homeboy."
What is it with so many guys that have reach advantages over most opponents not using their natural gift? Kendall Grove I am talking to you here…
by troutki on Jul 9, 2011 4:47 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Joell Ortiz said it best
When I'm on the mic it goes down, CINTRON
-Joell Ortiz
by The Lethal Haze on Jul 9, 2011 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Based on the fact that Urbano’s only two losses are to top-level fighters in Soto and Acosto and that Rios has only recently been fighting at an elite level, I think it’ll be a closer fight than many predict. And based on what I saw in Urbano vs Soto and Rios vs Acosto – this fight should rock.
The Williams fight will probably end up more competitive than people would guess, if only because I see Paul being conservative in his first fight after such a KO.
I was under the impression that this was a rebound fight for Williams.
I think Cofield wrote a good piece about how people shouldn’t abandon him yet.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
...looks like Cofield was wrong
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Jul 10, 2011 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions
boxing sites
Also wanted to add the queensberry rules to the excellent sites. That brent mentioned, also if anyone has any sites they use please share the knowledge
by Elstriko on Jul 9, 2011 10:37 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Just finished watching the Rios/Antillion fight and it was a fun fight
Rios was clearly better, but both guys also came to fight.
Wow! Lara got hosed. Bad judging is not just a MMA issue all the time. Williams was busier and kept moving forward so he won the fight like Page did with machida.
by troutki on Jul 10, 2011 12:14 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
We certainly saw the good and bad of boxing. I’m a huge Paul Williams fan and he got dominated yet won on scorecards. It’s a joke.
I hoped that Rios fight would have went longer than 3 rounds as it was two guys fighting in a phone booth.
I’ll always love boxing but the politics have kind of ruined it.

by 

















