UFC 130 Aftermath: Johnson vs Torres Under Submission Grappling Scoring
Judging a fight is a thankless task. Get it right and no one pays a blind bit of notice, but get it wrong and all sorts of people will be calling for your head. On first watch of the Miguel Torres vs Demetrious Johnson fight I had scored the first two rounds to Torres and the last round to Johnson and when the scorecards were read unanimously as 29-28 the only thing that caught me a little off guard was Johnson's name being read instead of Torres'. I was surprised but I wouldn't call it a robbery.
Already on grappling forums Brazilian Jiu Jitsu players are lamenting over the perceived unfair scoring advantage Wrestling has over BJJ, even some stating the guard is dead in MMA because the judges only care about who is on top. It's a familiar argument that comes up time and again but this time I thought I'd take them to task by re-watching the fight and attempt to implement the grappling scoring found under the International Brazilian Jiu Jitsu Federation (IBJJF) and Abu Dhabi Combat Club (ADCC) rule sets.
With MMA scoring it's always been difficult in attributing value to the more intricate aspects of grappling. How do you score a takedown compared to a sweep or guard pass? Do you score attempted though unsuccessful submission attempts and to what extent of execution must an attempted submission be worthy of scoring consideration? Should a fight be won round by round or as a whole? The world of competitive BJJ and Submission Grappling has at the least tried to quantify common positions and transitions which is why I've turned to the most prestigious and predominant Gi and No Gi bodies for inspiration.
I'll be the first to tell you that I've not done a lot of grappling scoring in the past and certainly not in any official capacity so forgive me if any errors have been made - it's just my subjective view of the fight that tries to be as objective as possible, which is all judging is in any sport. I will also produce the IBJJF and ADCC style scores of the fight based on the grappling data provided by Fight Metric in case they saw something I didn't (and it's always handy having a second opinion).
Firstly, here is the scoring criteria of both the IBJJF and ADCC though without the penalties as most of what they deem fouls are legal in MMA, and even the shared fouls in both aren't relevant at this time since neither fighter fouled the other.
IBJJF Scoring
4 points – mount, back grab (both hooks in)
3 points – passing the guard
2 points – take downs, sweeps and knee on the belly
1, 2, 3... – advantages
Advantages: It is considered an advantage when the athlete attempts but does not complete any of the fundamental moves of the fight; i.e. sweep, take down, submission etc. Basically 1 advantage point is given from each genuine though unsuccessful attempt that puts the opponent on the defensive, but the relevance of advantage points is only in the event the score is a draw at the end of the match. There is no minimum amount of time needed per position or transition to score points, the only instance of time frame comes in the case of stalling and when a penalty is levied or if one player falls for a leglock allowing the other player to get on top, the top player scores 2 points once he is out of danger and can maintain position for 3 seconds. Though there was an instance of Torres and Johnson going for leglocks there wasn't a 'leglock sweep' so i didn't count it as such.
For the purpose of scoring the Johnson vs Torres match I included the advantages in the IBJJF style scoring when it came to close submission attempts which came from Torres only in the fight. However trying to stay true to IBJJF scoring, the advantage points only come into play if the main score is a draw and so do not make up the total scoring.
For the full rules of IBJJF competition please click here.
ADCC Scoring
Each position must be established for 3 seconds or more being out of any danger of submission in order for points to be awarded.
* Mount position = 2 points
* Back mount with hooks = 3 points
* Passing the guard = 3 points
* Knee on stomach = 2 points
* Clean Take down (Ends passed the guard) = 4 points
* Take down (Ends Guard or Half Guard) = 2 points
* Clean Sweep (Ends passed the guard) = 4 points
* Sweep (Ends Guard or Half Guard) = 2 Points- Reversals are considered Sweeps as well.
- When changing multiple positions points will be awarded only for the position that has been established for 3 seconds or more.
- When passing the guard going straight to mount or knee on the stomach in less than 3 seconds points will be given only for passing the guard.
- The sweeps must be done in one continuous motion to be awarded with points.
As you can see the scoring is different here compared to IBJJF with more or less points being awarded to similar positions / transitions and in some cases more of a distinction is made such as clean sweeps vs sweeps and clean takedowns vs takedowns. Also when it comes to sweeps, a sweep only counts in IBJJF if it is from guard or half-guard and IBJJF do not score reversals (such as Johnson reversing from under Torres side control) where as ADCC do. IBJJF does not make the distinction ADCC does and so scores all takedowns and sweeps equally and I have factored this in to the IBJJF style scoring and the ADCC style scoring.
The exceptions I have made came in the instance of Torres using a triangle frame up to sweep Johnson. I'm not sure if IBJJF would consider that a sweep, and I'm sure ADCC would, so for the sake of argument I've included it as a sweep for both (but not a clean sweep for ADCC).
Another exception I made was ADCC's 3 second rule and I scored takedowns once the head was clear and the upper body was out of any submission danger. With that in mind I did not score Johnson's last second takedown at the end of round 3 as Torres finished the round in a guillotine from guard position, but by the same token I did not award Torres an advantage because I felt Johnson was not in submission danger long enough with the round ending so soon afterward.
Similarly with sweeps I ignored the 3 second rule because I felt there was merit in getting a sweep even if a scramble ensued a second later as was often the case with Johnson after being swept by Torres. This actually benefits Torres in the scoring where genuine ADCC scoring might not be so lenient. The main reason for ignoring the 3 second rule was partly to make scoring both IBJJF and ADCC style easier, but also because MMA fighters only have 5 minutes at a time to play with where as in IBJJF and ADCC matches the top adult Blackbelt categories can grapple from 10 to 20 minutes non-stop, and total duration for ADCC matches in particular can double if there's a draw and the match goes into overtime.
For the full rules of ADCC competition please click here.
Results and Conclusion after the jump.
The Results
My Score:
Fight Metric's Score:
Round 1
IBJJF: 8-2 Torres, 11-5 Torres
ADCC: 8-4 Torres, 11-4 Torres
Fight Metric spotted a pass from Johnson in the first that I missed and an extra pass for Torres that I missed, however only I considered 2 advantage points in the first for the leglock and inverted triangle attempts from Torres. We both score the round for Torres though.
Round 2
IBJJF: 12-2 Johnson, 7-0 Johnson
ADCC: 12-2 Jonson, 7-0 Johnson
I scored a sweep for Torres where Fight Metric didn't, I scored 2 passes and 3 takedowns for Johnson where Fight Metric scored 1 pass and 2 takedowns. Interestingly the IBJJF and ADCC style criteria score it the same for our respective scorecards. We both scored a submission Advantage for Torres under the IBJJF style scoring.
Round 3
IBJJF: 5-4 Johnson, 8-7 Torres
ADCC: 6-5 Torres, 10-7 Torres
Fight Metric scored an extra takedown for Johnson. This could well have been the takedown at the end I didn't score because Johnson had not cleared his head of Torres guillotine attempt. Fight Metric also scored 2 passes for Torres and I scored none. I've just watched the third round again and see no successful pass from Torres against Johnson who is always able to keep a leg in during the short time he was on bottom. Even if you have the shallowest of half guards, if the guy on top doesn't clear them under IBJJF or ADCC it's not a pass. I can only guess it's a mistake on behalf of Fight Metric.
I scored 2 sweeps for Torres where Fight Metric scored 1. It's safe to bet the 1 sweep they did see was the Clean Sweep Torres achieved that got him from the bottom guard to a secure mount on top. The other sweep I saw was from a Guillotine choke attempt later on and Torres tried to mount but his legs and knees were still off the mat as Johnson looked to regain guard. Joe Rogan commented that Torres got mount, but technically he did not. I scored it as a sweep rather than a clean sweep as a result but it looks like Fight Metric didn't count it at all. Both Fight Metric and I gave Torres 2 Submission Advantage points.
So, how do the scores stack up?
Round by Round I scored it 2 rounds to 1 IBJJF style for Johnson, and 2 rounds to 1 ADCC style for Torres. Interestingly the ruleset that should favour BJJ the most scores against the BJJ guard player where as the ruleset that claims to be neutral and promote equality among all grappling styles gives it to him and it's largely the clean sweep in the 3rd round that nudges Torres ahead.
Round by Round Fight Metric scores it 2 rounds to 1 IBJJF and ADCC style for Torres, though as I mentioned while I may have missed a couple of things earlier on in the fight, the two phantom guard passes Fight Metric scored in the third round for Torres effects their scoring as well.
When considering the fight as a whole, I score it 19-14 IBJJF style and 21-16 ADCC style for Johnson. Fight Metric though produces a score of 19-19 IBJJF style and 21-21 ADCC style making it a draw. Since only IBJJF deals with advantage points and ADCC doesn't, if the fight were to be scored as a whole Torres could get a decision on 3 advantage points, but only because of the Fight Metric score translating into a grappling draw based on IBJJF style rules.
What can we conclude from this?
Firstly as fans and analysts of MMA, some of us like Kid Nate put value into submission attempts because of an attempt to finish the fight but it's interesting under grappling specific competition scoring (and one tailored to BJJ specifically) that attempt to finish the match is only considered if everything else has been scored a draw. If Submission Grappling and BJJ specific competitions only score successful transitions and positions and not attempted submissions, why are we putting more value on the attempts when watching MMA?
Secondly the notion of a Wrestling / Guy-on-Top bias when it comes to MMA scoring is either over exaggerated, or is ironically almost equally apparent in BJJ and Submission Grappling competitions. The reality of the Johnson vs Torres fight though is Johnson worked to pass guard as well as get takedowns - he did not lay in Torres guard for the duration and while it can be rightly argued he did not work to finish the fight his technical ability in passing should be acknowledged just as it would have been in IBJJF and ADCC style competitions.
I scored it as objectively as I could and it ended up round by round for Johnson under IBJJF, Torres under ADCC and as a whole it went to Johnson for both. Fight Metric's transposed data ended up with round by round for Torres under IBJJF and ADCC though not without some question marks. As a whole Fight Metric ended up with a draw for both sets of scores.
If we go just by Fight Metric data transposed to IBJJF and ADCC style scoring, and include the significant striking they scored, Johnson wins on the percentages round by round and as a whole as well.
Sheesh. Who'd want to be a judge?
UPDATE: Fight Metric were kind enough to get in contact with me to explain how they consider passing -
... we consider half guard to be a positional advance because it is a far superior MMA position than full guard. The term "pass" is imprecise in our case, where what we really mean is positional advances. We diverge from official BJJ scoring in a few ways, but this is one of the ways that would manifest itself most significantly in the analysis you were doing.
So some of the passes they consider in an MMA fight happen by passing from Guard to Half Guard, which wouldn't be scored at all in either IBJJF or ADCC style rule sets. Unfortunately what this means is the data Fight Metric publish can't be used when transposed for IBJJF and ADCC style scoring making their IBJJF/ADCC score sheet void.
104 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
While this is a fun exercise,
pure grappling scoring is vastly different than it SHOULD be (IMO) in an MMA fight.
I will say it right now- damage is all that does matter and all that should matter in a fight. Grappling positions, takedowns, etc are all secondary considerations under the umbrella of control.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 6:39 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Fair point
Of course based on the significant striking % (ergo the damage) Johnson still wins as there is no way of assessing what damage might be going on (if any) from Torres’ submission attempts. This isn’t like Street Fighter or Tekken where a grappling hold causes the health bar to gradually go down.
Exactly
There’s no accumulation of damage from most failed sub attempts – either it ends the fight or it doesn’t.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on May 29, 2011 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions
There's no accumulation of damage from most top control, and it almost never ends a fight.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on May 29, 2011 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I was more responding to Derek's over-valuing of top-control
I love this scoring exercise. I agree that this fight wasn’t a robbery, but I still think competent judges should have scored it for Torres.
The bigger problem, is that certain judging biases (in favor of wild striking, aka Garcia, and stifling top control, aka Fitch) reward a fighting style that is excessively safe and uninspiring to most fans.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on May 29, 2011 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions
excessively safe or excessively reckless
Yes I agree. I love wrestling but it bugs the F**k out of me guys aren’t doing more with it. It must be a mental block because of a fear of getting subbed if they dare to move. This is why I have an unashamed bias towards catch wrestling because it gets wrestlers active and knowing how to deal with submissions but also execute their own. The missing link between wrestling and submissions, as I like to call it.
incentives are everything
If Jon Fitch (sorry to keep picking on him) wins virtually every fight doing what he does, why would he even consider changing? I don’t think you need to change the rules, but I think the sport could benefit from an interpretation of the scoring criteria that rewards an effort to finish.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on May 29, 2011 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions
The cons of fights that go the duration
Prolonged exposure that at the least can add to wear and tear of the body, and prolonged risk of getting injured or hurt and allowing the opponent the full duration to mount any possible offense. For example, had GSP pushed more to get a finish early on, had he succeeded he wouldn’t have been in the fight long enough to get poked in the eye and detach his retina. OK, that’s an example with the benefit of hindsight but I think my point has some merit to it.
The main problem of not finishing,
and in lieu of a finish, not beating the opponent up, they will always be a threat. Finishing someone eliminates the possibility completely.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I
don’t think you need to change the rules, but I think the sport could benefit from an interpretation of the scoring criteria that rewards an effort to finish.A rules change would be all but impossible right now I’m afraid, although your suggestion of an updated interpretation to favor the intent of the rules over the desires of the point-fighter wrestlers who are taking advantage of the letter of the rules is an ideal solution.
Barring that, Dana introducing finishing bonuses or, even better, restructuring contracts to emphasize finishing rather than simply winning would go a long way toward fixing it. There will still be some LnP out of necessity (Kos/Daley for example), but…
"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.
by The American Ronin on May 30, 2011 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Only because of the unified rules
Side control and knees to the head, 12-6 elbows, forearms to the throat (aside: why can’t you use a forearm to choke from top control, but are allowed to from any other position?), etc would make top control a very damaging position.
It would be too “barbaric”, though, so MMA borrows a page from wrestling: get a guy on his back, and we’ll just call it dominance.
by paythefighters on May 31, 2011 6:50 AM EDT up reply actions
thats not true.
Neck injuries from pulling out of guillotines, exhaustion in general . don Frye says shamrock snapped one of his knees with a heelhook that he didn’t tap to.
That’s a very uninformed statement.
"Many have the will to win. Few have to will to prepare to win."
" A black belt only covers 2 inches of your ass. The rest is up to you." - Royce Gracie
"Wanderlei eventually got to his feet and stalked Fujita like a Japanese octopus in an all-female prison." - Sean Baby Cracked.com
by the-gentle-way on May 29, 2011 6:56 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
God bless that qualifier.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on May 29, 2011 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions
In those cases though
How is a Judge supposed to know, especially if a fighter does his best to hide it and soldier on? It’s either that or quitting on his stool, or the referee / doctor stopping the fight.
Somehow a quick X-Ray or MRI between rounds to give to judges isn’t going to be a realistic solution
the same way an IBJJF ref
decides advantages, by watching the fight and being knowledgeable. Also, generally if you have to move to defend a submission attempt then you get the advantage.
by the way, great article.
"Serious sport is war minus the shooting."
George Orwell
To be fair
Frye had enough painkillers in him to kill an elephant. Anyone else taps to those heelhooks.
BOOSH
That first sentence is probably literal. Would have killed an elephant.
Don Frye yawned twice and was good to go. His mustache slapped him any time he got groggy.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
This is a point that I find interesting. In professional boxing, boxers are given credit for throwing many punches, volume punching, even when they don’t land. Throwing alot of punches = good. With submission attempts, I think there should be some way to credit a fighter for attempting many submissions. Just like every punch doesn’t have to result in a knockout to count, I don’t think every submission attempt needs to end in a finish to count for something. Now, if you ask me how to count in the judging, I have no idea.
I particularly think locked in submissions where you are only saved by the bell should be almost an automatic round winner (Miller/Shields or Wandi/Bisping).
"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.
by The American Ronin on May 30, 2011 2:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Johnson had a SLIGHT edge in "significant strikes",
to the tune of 13-10. Overall, Torres landed 95 strikes to Johnson’s 63 strikes.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Sure, but why make the distinction of significant strikes
Unless the other strikes they didn’t score weren’t significant? You just said yourself a fight should be judged on damage.
The "significant strikes" moniker
Straight from the horse’s mouth (Fightmetric)-
A quick definition: significant strikes refer to all strikes at distance and power strikes in the clinch and on the ground. It does not include small, short strikes in the clinch and on the ground.
So the 85 strikes Torres landed that weren’t at range, or a big power shot clinched/ on the mat, all fall into that category. All the short clinch knees, rabbit punches in the clinch and on the mat, etc were part of this, and I guarantee you that adds up. He landed 32 more of these short strikes in the clinch/ on the mat than Johnson did, which is definitely a significant amount.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I dunno if people would actually like that
Potentially Bisping could be an undefeated champion by winning pitter-patter decisions all the time. just because of quantity.
Quantity and quality.
Anyone with functioning eyesight and knowledge of the sport can tell the difference between a peppering Bisping punch, and a massive hook from Wanderlei Silva. Wand hurt Mike every time he connected, so the quality difference was VERY obvious, and he was justly awarded the decision.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Didn't Johnson land more quality strikes than Torres though?
I’m not sure where you’re going with this.
DJ never rocked/ dropped Miguel.
Wanderlei dropped Bisping and hurt him more than once IIRC. That is the difference, you’re mixing up the fights in question.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions
I remember Silva dropping Bisping
I’m just going based on the sig strikes percentage and stats that Fight Metric is producing. Fight Metric doesn’t differentiate sig. strikes between knock downs and clean hard shots and that is a big problem in my opinion.
As I said, judging is a difficult thing. I’d like Fight Metric to include a Knock Down in their criteria, it’s really surprising that they don’t especially when in Boxing a knockdown gives you a 10-8 round more often than not.
Fightmetric notes knockdowns.
And SOLELY looking at the fightmetric is a grave, grave error. The only way to see what really happened is by watching it with an open mind, and astute eye.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Of course
And I think grounds for one judge to focus on striking and one judge to focus on grappling and the points to be appropriately added together to form some kind of agreeable score.
Have to disagree with you there.
In MMA, I don’t believe in utilizing the different scoring criterion of grappling and striking arts. MMA is simply the sport of fighting and should be scored accordingly.
You can’t separate the two from eachother.
I know you love grappling KJ (as do I), but i’m going to give you the straight talk here- I don’t think grappling positions or transitions should be a primary consideration in scoring an MMA bout [with the exception of slams/ high altitude throws, certain near- submissions (either ones that actively damage or are saved by the bell), and truly DOMINANT, and suffocating positions (crucifix/ Salaverry, scarf hold, S- mount, anaconda body lock from back mount, STOUT crossface from mount)].
Soft takedowns and ground positions are only as valuable as the practitioner makes it. Control is necessary and pivotal in MMA, but should be a secondary consideration to damage. Damage is the only truly objective, quantifiable factor in scoring a fight. Because really, the essence of fighting/ martial arts can be summed up as such: Inflict maximum harm, absorb a minimum.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't disagree
Judging the separate elements is one solution. Damage only and trying to finish is another and for both you and I more preferable.
Of course I can argue Wrestlers can make top half guard, cross body and north south suffocating where BJJ guys might not be able to :P
Seriously though, when Lesnar used a Stockade from inside Mir’s half guard, that was deadly.
That would definitely be under the
“DOMINANT, suffocating positions” category.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions
DJ rocked him with a knee at the end. Just saying.
And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it. ... Always a ninja
SaberCats Examiner | SB Nation Bay Area | Niners Nation | Twitter
Don't remember Torres being rocked from that.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 30, 2011 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Then you should probably watch it again.
I totally see where you’re coming from, but I hate how people on one side of an argument completely erase everything that could possibly be harmful to it at all. You can have your stance while agreeing that the knee rocked him, otherwise it just seems kind of desperate and revisionist.
And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it. ... Always a ninja
SaberCats Examiner | SB Nation Bay Area | Niners Nation | Twitter
I'm not intentionally saying it didn't happen,
I’ve only seen the fight once and don’t remember that.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 30, 2011 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Torres clearly stumbled and wobbled from that knee.
Canucks Cup Countdown: 4
Next Series: Operation Bruins in Ruins
Is this the knee you're talking about?
Looks more like being off balance than being rocked.

Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 30, 2011 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions
That's exactly what Ninjames said.
DJ rocked him with a knee at the end. Just saying.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 30, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t know what other knee at the end of the fight he could’ve been talking about.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 30, 2011 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions
That's not the knee
There was one after they stood up.
Canucks Cup Countdown: 4
Next Series: Operation Bruins in Ruins
Gif or it didn't happen!
For real though, Johnson did get the better of the brief striking exchanges. That actually really impressed me.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 31, 2011 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Very simply.
Quantity and quality of strikes, slams, and in some cases- near submissions & SUFFOCATING grappling positions.
And by near submissions, I mean like Rafael Dos Anjos’ calf slicer that hobbled Tyson Griffin. Or a topside crucifix/ body anaconda from the back/ S- Mount/ STRONG crossface from the top.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Quantity and quality of strikes
Emphasis mine.
This is very subjective. Aesthetically a strike can look devastating and have very little effect, and the opposite can be true as well. I don’t think judges are capable of making the distinction in real time.
www.hottopicwithphil.com
Not subjective,
just a matter of perception. This is obviously the problem with all judging, but it’s pretty easy to see by the velocity and impact of a strike as to how hard the strike was. Kickboxing and boxing judges have been doing this for decades now.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions
you know that if something is subjective
it means a that is up to individual perception, right?
Unless you are Anderson Silva or Neo you cannot see the velocity of a punch or tell how much damage it did well the fight is going on. That is why there are debatable or downright wrong decisions in striking sports.
"Serious sport is war minus the shooting."
George Orwell
Subjective-
Based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
I obviously meant that individual opinions should not have anything to do with how you judge a fight. Sure, your outlook on life colors your perception, but it’s important to be as objective/ unbiased as possible, and that’s what I meant by “a matter of perception”.
There are debatable/ controversial decisions in anything with subjective scoring criteria, but the only way to make things reliable is to try for whatever is closest to objective.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions
fair enough
However, I don’t think that you can develop a scoring criteria that will ever be objective unless you have no time limit finish only fights, which will never happen. I think we should stop focusing on the criteria and focus on
"Serious sport is war minus the shooting."
George Orwell
I think we need both.
Clearer criteria that favors damage, and better quality judges.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 30, 2011 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions
velocity and impact are easy to perceive, but oh man like actual strike accuracy is really difficult to figure out even on a replay, unless it results in a stumble / knockdown then it’s all “yeah he rawked him that’s biiiiig points”
Big scores man.
Boxing judges and K-1/ MT judges do a pretty good job though.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Sure there will be some discrepency
But if a judge can’t tell if one shot is harder from another he probably shouldn’t be judging. It’s kind of a big part of the job.
Contributor at cagepages.com Come check us out.
Head Kick Legend
by Neil Manich on May 29, 2011 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Sounds like it was a really, really close fight.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on May 29, 2011 6:45 PM EDT reply actions
Which it was
Not sure why people are acting like Mighty Mouse Garcia’d Torres.
i think people are getting sick of take downs being favored over intent to finish.
I know I am.
"Many have the will to win. Few have to will to prepare to win."
" A black belt only covers 2 inches of your ass. The rest is up to you." - Royce Gracie
"Wanderlei eventually got to his feet and stalked Fujita like a Japanese octopus in an all-female prison." - Sean Baby Cracked.com
by the-gentle-way on May 29, 2011 6:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
But here's the thing
Johnson was actually successful with his takedowns.
Torres failed in every attempt to finish the fight.
Success>Failure.
www.hottopicwithphil.com
by Worldisart on May 29, 2011 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Never really looked at it that way
Even though it’s as obvious as can be. And while Torres was attempting submissions Mighty Mouse was defending. That’s a wash. Fighters know how the judges look at fights. If you aren’t getting results off of your back you need to get up or sweep.
"I will do nothing lightly. When I walk, I will walk heavily. When I fight, I will fight with conviction. When I speak, I will speak strongly. When I love, I will love with everything"
Fans know how judges score fights as well
But when we live in a world where Keith Jardine won the first round against Mousasi, we need to get judges to change.
Contributor at cagepages.com Come check us out.
Head Kick Legend
by Neil Manich on May 29, 2011 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions
You'd have to include sweeps, passes and reversals
If you want intent to finish to be scored more. All of which are favoured over the intent to finish in IBJJF and ADCC style competitions. interestingly in ADCC the first half of the match isn’t scored as a prompt to get guys looking for a finish. Absolutely I want guys to try to finish but I also know with more even match ups at the high level, decisions and even draws are going to become more common place. One sided fights and destructive finishes usually come from a mismatch in skill, ability or both.
This is very interesting
I never saw what all of the hoopla was really about anyway. The Fight was close as hell, this wasn’t a robbery.
"eat a dick" - Chris Barton
Perhaps I should add
I don’t necessarily agree with the scoring of BJJ / SG and MMA as it stands. Even though ADCC tries to claim neutrality, scoring is based on orthodox BJJ position progression for the most part.
Karl Gotch’s suggestion for Catch Wrestling I like: Time Limit draw, instant re-play / rematch, submission and pin only, best 2 out of 3 falls, a single 15 minute straight round. Potentially 30 minutes total to get a finish. No scores for Lay’n’Pray as a result, and nobody wants to go home with a draw.
I've always preferred
competing in submission- only tourneys. That is the way our gym does it, and I think it encourages a much more functional approach to grappling.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 29, 2011 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
The striking I guess
Let’s get this myth out of the way: Takedowns scoring is not a wrestling only phenomenon. Takedowns score in BJJ and Submission Grappling, as well as Wrestling (Folkstyle or Freestyle) as well as MMA. Coupled with Johnson’s ability to pass the guard and aggressively scramble made it a close fight with Torres’ ability to sweep and pass guard himself as well as take dominant position.
Niether fighter threw particularly brilliant shots but I can see some of the better shots on the feet going on Johnson even if Torres was throwing stabbing elbows from the bottom (the type that only cut). I’m not anti elbows, but if you ask me which I prefer and which are more meaningful between short stabbing elbows from bottom, and hard arcing elbows from on top I’ll pick the latter 100% of the time.
So what you're saying ...
… is that grappling scoring is as bad as MMA scoring?
I kid — this is an interesting way to look at it.
But I agree with metaldome — Johnson spent most of the fight on defense, even when he was on top. That’s difficult to quantify, but that’s one reason the subjectivity of MMA judging is actually preferable to point scoring. (I call as Exhibit A — amateur boxing. Yes, I’ve covered it.)
So when are you doing the judo version? Did Torres do anything that would qualify as waza-ari?
by Beau Dure on May 29, 2011 7:31 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I chose BJJ and SG scoring
To prove a point against everyone bleating MMA has an anti-BJJ, pro-wrestling bias.
I think that works. Though I suppose MMA itself, not MMA judging, will favor wrestlers because BJJ doesn’t really lend itself to ground-and-pound.
Maybe only BJJ from your back
If you come from a Carlson Gracie affiliate, you already know the significance of a good top game and takedowns since Carlson embraced that element of grappling. Which is why it’s so odd that Miguel Torres, a blackbelt under the late Carlson Gracie should be so bad and getting a takedown (although is good at passing but not necessarily maintaining top position).
Having said that even the side of BJJ that emphasizes a top game does not, in my opinion, make themselves heavy and controlling enough compared to a good Down wrestler that specializes in pinning and riding. The biggest key to successful Ground and Pound is the Grounding aspect imo.
This.
Johnson spent most of the fight on defense, even when he was on top. That’s difficult to quantify, but that’s one reason the subjectivity of MMA judging is actually preferable to point scoring. (I call as Exhibit A — amateur boxing. Yes, I’ve covered it.)
PS: Still, this was a great and fun article KJ. :)
by Anton Tabuena on May 29, 2011 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't disagree
It was an interesting scoring exercise using rule sets that for all intents and purposes are tailored for Submission guys. Perhaps they should rename their sport to Position Grappling instead? But oh no it’s not wrestling, mind. :)
by KJ Gould on May 29, 2011 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
The real robbery is not the Torres loss...
..the real robbery is that these guys didn’t get their paycheck for Fight of the Night. They earned it.
Great article KJ! I’m glad to see that I wasn’t as crazy as I felt in the live thread, when everyone was saying that Torres got robbed and I said I felt it could go either way. Great analysis and breakdown – I like the comparative use of multiple metrics and data sources. It warms the heart of this cynical teacher.
If this life be not a real fight, in which something is eternally gained for the universe by success, it is no better than a game of private theatricals from which one may withdraw at will. But it feels like a real fight. - William James
Yeah,
I can’t believe Stann/ Santiago won FotN. They should’ve just given out the bonus to both fights if they liked the Stann knockout, or just given him KotN too.
My conspiracy theory (mentioned this in another thread) is that Stann got gifted the bonus due to all the Memorial Day, Seal Team 6, patriotic whatnotery.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 30, 2011 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions
In BJJ comp there would be no takedowns
If they were in a grappling match, Torres would just pull guard and clearly win the fight on sweeps. Its the nature of the games. They are different.
Pulling guard in ADCC can get you penalised one point though
Unless you use it to sweep immediately. Pull guard and spend 3 seconds on your back and you can lose a point. ADCC recognises takedowns as an important part of grappling.
There are takedowns in BJJ comps
And you do not get points for pulling guard., FWIW.
certified warlord
I know people hate the advantage judges give to top control, and I hate it too. However, Torres’ “sub” attempts were the equivalent to Garcia’s wild punches. He just kept throwing them up there with no set ups or with any hope of actually completing one. I cannot give points for him throwing up sub attempts just to look busy, which is what he was doing. Not once was DJ ever in trouble of being submitted.
He swept him with leglock attempts though, that counts for something
Besides, if Johnson is defending even speculative submission attempts then he’s not attacking, and that means Miguel is ahead on aggression.
"With gold thou boughtest Gýmir's daughter,
and so gavest away thy sword:
but when Muspell's sons through the dark forest ride,
thou, unhappy, wilt not have wherewith to fight."
~ Lokasenna
While Torres was working on setting up submissions,
Johnson was on the defensive the whole time. The point isn’t whether or not he finished the submission, it’s what the submission accomplished. In this case, Johnson was on his heels and playing defense non- stop. And and that is the exact definition of the “active and threatening guard” criteria.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 30, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't get this line of thinking
If you’re trying submissions, what is the other guy meant to do other than defend? Similarly if you’re on bottom and the guy is trying to pass your guard, you defend. For the excellence of Torres guard that people keep trumpeting, he had it passed several times by Johnson. If Johnson only got takedowns and sat in Torres guard while Torres did the same amount of sweeping and his own passing I think the fight would be more clear cut (or a more clear cut ‘robbery’).
To clarify,
I don’t personally think that submission attempts should be awarded except for when they actually do damage but the opponent doesn’t tap (like Dos Anjos’ calf cutter on Griffin), or “saved by the bell” situations.
That said, “threatening guard” is clearly a criteria in the “effective grappling” category.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on May 31, 2011 2:35 AM EDT up reply actions
I think a distinction should be made between defending submissions, and escaping submissions
Defending stops a submissions from being locked up in the first place, so it becomes a stalemate between offensive and defensive grappling. Escaping means a sub is locked on and the fighter is in real danger of losing. Perhaps there should be a time frame a submission should be locked on (like 10 seconds) to carry favour with the offensive fighter. Sometimes I’ve seen a triangle fully locked on only to have it smashed and passed in a couple of seconds, but if it takes around 10 seconds or more to escape there’s a better indication the fighter on the receiving end is in trouble.
It's all really a case- by- case thing.
I don’t think you can have any real 10- second rule, because some submissions held that long are close and others aren’t. If you’re judging just the grappling, then it’s all situational.
Xtreme Couture- The best never rest! The girl in my av is Kari Sweets (you're welcome).
"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates
by ElliotMatheny on Jun 3, 2011 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice breakdown, but...
…there is a difference between how grappling competitions are scored and how the grappling portion of MMA is scored. The biggest difference (well, exept grappling competitions having decided points for specific positions, something that simply don´t work with the 10-point system) is that in MMA, sumissionatempts actually score and are not just something to look at in case of a draw.
From the unified rules:
“Effective grappling is judged by considering the amount of successful executions of a legal takedown and reversals. Examples of factors to consider are take downs from standing position to mount position, passing the guard to mount position, and bottom position fighters using an active, threatening guard.” (emphasis mine)
(Source: http://www.abcboxing.com/unified_mma_rules.html )
It´s not only successful submissions and sweeps that count, but also active and threatening grappling techniqeus, where a fighter on bottom basicly force the fighter on top to go on the defense.
There is no doubt that Torres used an active threatening guard in this fight. He was going for a bunch of submissions and sweeps (some more successful than others). When you add that to the rest of the scoring (Torres landing 32 more total strikes and 3 less significant strikes acording to fightmetric (none of the strikes were significant enough to be real gamechangers i.m.o.) and the positional part of the game presented in this article in an excellent way) a competitive (and absolutely amazing to watch) fight should be tilted to Torres.
Lets remember, when we score, the unified rules is what matters. I see alot of posts expressing opinions on what counts and what don´t, but what actually counts is in the rules. The scoring criteria is more developed than just the quick graphics the UFC shows at the start of the show.
What time is it?
HAWK TIME!
While I agree entirely with what you are saying,
despite the presence of that in the URs, most judges seem to ignore it.
"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.
by The American Ronin on May 30, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes...
… it´s really sad that the judges seem to completely ignore what they are actually hired to do. It´s even more sad that judges, despite clearly not doing their job in a competant maner, is still brought back over and over.
Few things makes me more sad than watching a fight where one fighter is clearly winning acording to the rules, but knowing during the whole fight that the judges will give the fight to the other guy, simply because we all know, not only that judges are incompetant, but also HOW they are incompetant…
What time is it?
HAWK TIME!
The judging article a while back on here was very good. Basically it said only score effective offensive. No cage control, no aggression, etc. Strong sub attempts(ones that clearly require the other person to defend them) would be the only thing that does not necessary translate to damage that you would count. Takedowns would only score if they were slams. It was a great article.
I am free because I choose to be so-Me
Interesting write up.
Something no one has mentioned here is that DJ seemed to be just a little too strong for Torres, which was the main reason I thought that he won.
Torres seemed to be a better technical grappler, he had better diversity in his techniques and he seemed more comfortable on the ground, but it just seemed like Johnson was able to see when he was in trouble and power his way out of it.
Case in point was the beautiful sweep Torres used to land in mount, complete with his legs hooked under Johnsons back. Yet after he got to mount he simply held on while Johnson attempted to get his legs free and once he did, he escaped. Torres threw no punches, no sub attempts, just held on to prevent Johnson from escaping.
I thought that was the fight in a nutshell really and I also thought that Torres should have used his sweeps to get the fight back to standing more than he did.
If he had returned to standing every time he was taken down I think the judges would have looked at that a lot more favorably than they looked at his technically solid defensive grappling work.
Everyone check out the update at the end of the article
Fight Metric got in touch to explain how they score passing and it changes the perspective on the fight completely.

by 






























