Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Six things I want to see happen in MMA in the next year.

I won't bore you with the details of the complicated mathematical formulas that I used to calculate my percentages. I will just say that it involved a Ouija board, and abacus, and copious amounts of Jim Beam and crystal meth.


#1: Diaz vs. St. Pierre and Ubereem vs. whoever the HW champion is at the time.

 

Chance of happening- 21% that one or the other happens.

Diaz/St Pierre is a long shot, especially with Nick's rumblings of boxing over MMA and Caesar Gracie's recent hints that a UFC contract was essentially turned down. Even if Diaz hits the Octagon, the chances of him getting positionally controlled for three rounds by the gatekeepers of the division probably rule out anything other than an immediate title shot due to a strikeforce/UFC title unification bout. Who knows, maybe Diaz and his entertaining and extremely active sub game has progressed far enough to pick up some quick wins when he is put on his back, but I am not holding my breath. This fight is also immediately in the toilet if the Silva/St. Pierre superfight materializes, If St. Pierre is serious about only doing it if it meant a legitimate move to 185.

Overeem is more likely, but not anything I would bet the house on. Contractual negotiations would test the UFC's policies regarding their fighters fighting places other than the UFC. He is extremely unlikely to give up K-1. Sure, they were going to let Fedor have sambo, but does Overeem have the negotiating power that Emelianenko's name (and those M1 leeches) gave him? I doubt it. If Overeem wins the HW GP the demand for him in the UFC among more casual fans improves his value and bargaining position, but the UFC is going to want 3 fights a year out of him, and consistency in MMA schedule has not been Overeem's forte over the last couple of years.

 

Reason:
Diaz vs. St. Pierre as a five rounder is a fight I have wanted to see since like 2005, before Georges had even won the strap, but had to watch in angst as Diaz got wrestled and positionally decisioned and couldn't manage to put together enough consecutive wins to make the fight feasible (and then Diaz leaving the UFC right after St. Pierre won the title from Hughes). I have occasionally brought this matchup up over the years on various forums and without fail got shot down with derision. Don't get me wrong, I do not especially expect Diaz to win this fight (St Pierre being the best example of the archetype of fighter that gives Diaz fits) but I still want to see this fight for the same reasons I always have, as the ultimate test for the toughest SOB in MMA. Can St. Pierre break Diaz? Finish him? (Who has, legitimately?) Can Diaz's constantly moving and active sub game scare Georges enough after a few rounds to make him stand with him? How will the 2011 version of Diaz handle the strength and wrestling of St. Pierre? I love this fight on paper, and sometimes weep softly into my pillow at night at the thought that I will not likely ever see it.

Ubereem vs. Velasquez (Or anybody in the top three UFC HW division for that matter) does not need any extrapolation at all. Alistair is the most dangerous striker on the planet right now, without needing qualification or caveat.I want to see him fight the best MMA heavyweights in the world, and so do you.

 

#2: Some semblance of coherent, intelligent MMA judging.

 

Chance of happening: 32%.

Perhaps I am being much too optimistic, but I am really pulling for this to be the year that fundamental changes are made to the process of appointing and training judges in this sport. With the volume of widely ridiculed decisions in the past two years, the commissions have finally publicly made statements feebly defending themselves. This is a huge step in the right direction. With everybody in the major MMA media and those in the forefront of the sport like Rogan and DW lambasting the current system, I actually have a good feeling that in the next year or so we will see some concrete steps to correcting this issue.

Reason:

The current judging system is almost a complete crap shoot. Decisions come down almost every single event that boggle the mind. To us, the fans, the fact that we are still seeing this crap after all these years is extremely irritating. To the fighters, whose careers can completely change with every win and loss (and whose purses are directly affected), this just shows a incredible amount of disrespect for what they do and how hard they train. This isn't rocket science. After this many years even Cecil Peoples and Abe Bellardo should be great judges just through osmosis. Hiding behind bureaucratic process and tradition is no longer an acceptable answer for the continued incompetence routinely displayed from judges appointed by the AC's.

 

#3: Knees to to head of a grounded opponent.

 

Chance of happening: .017% And I am pretty sure I am being overly generous.

Lets face it, this or any other rule changes (12 to 6, anyone?) are not going to happen while MMA is still not sanctioned everywhere in North America. And when it is, the bureaucracy of trying to implement rule changes over so many different athletic commission means that this is a total pipe dream. But its MY dream, and I am going to cling to it despite common sense dictating otherwise.

Reason:

Besides the old school part of me that always wants to give fighters more tools to finish fights rather than less, my desire to see this stems from watching all too many pathetic fighters shooting lazy single legs and humping them for 15 minutes en route to unanimous decisions. The first time one of these clowns got their jaws kneed into press row would serve glorious notice that skill and timing was now needed in order to wrestle out a decision. Every time I see the "gamesmanship" of a fighter keeping a knee and hand on the ground to prevent himself from having to pay for a serious miscalculation, a part of my soul dies. As another benefit, wrestlers would now be able to finish a lot more fights from top control, which would help to ease some of the distaste casual fans have for wrestlers. Jon Fitch might also finish a fight and become the top PPV draw in UFC history. Maybe.

 

#4: Fedor having a career resurgence at 205


Chance of happening: 42% of Fedor deciding to move down, 83% of the move giving him prolonged relevance in the upper echelon of the sport, and 92.6% that M1 screws everything up.

I believe that the chance of Fedor actually going down to 205 is completely dependent on his drive to even keep fighting. If he still has the hunger, I imagine we will see Fedor at LHW within 12 months time. Fedor at 205 could be an absolute nightmare, even in his current somewhat diminished (aura at the least) state. The biggest problem to Emelianenko retaining any relevance is his association with M1. With the UFC's acquisition of Strikeforce, any negotiation/renegotiation that hits the table is not going to be as liberal as it was when it was all Coker's show. Dana will never co promote and already has residual resentment with M1. I think that Dana would rather see the end of Fedor's career relevance rather than put up with one iota of M1's notoriously difficult negotiations. If M1 is smart enough to not attempt and prematurely re-negotiate his Strikeforce contract, we will undoubtedly see Fedor fulfill his remaining fights. After that he may be effectively forced to retire.

Reason:

Fedor is the greatest heavyweight in MMA's (albeit short) history. A humble, polite and generous human being, it would be nice for him to get some North American stardom and recognition in the twilight of his career. He has made it clear that retirement is in his future. A belt around his waist when he retired would make a great bookend to an amazing career. Seeing a slowed down Fedor getting smothered and beaten up by larger opponents the caliber of Bigfoot Silva would not.

 

#5: A restructuring of the power balance in the relationship between Zuffa and SPIKE.


Chance of happening: 39.5%

With the continued growth of the UFC brand, global expansion, deal with VERSUS, and a great demographic, SPIKE has needed the UFC more than the UFC needs them for several years now. Fight fans will follow the UFC whatever cable channel (or, wishful thinking, network!) they end up on.

Reason:

There is no really practical reason that I desperately want this to happen. But everything except the UFC that is on SPIKE is the most consistently retarded and embarrassing programming on television, which is saying a lot in this reality TV age. The vague insinuation that I fit into the target audience for this shit just makes me feel uneasy and weirdly shameful of my love of the sport. Everytime I hear Goldberg have to shill Blue Mountain State or fucking COAL I throw up in my mouth a little. SPIKE should be praying to their idiot pagan frat boy gods everyday for the UFC's continued business relationship. At this point, association with the mouth-breathing programming on spike is detrimental to the UFC's brand if they want to continue to market MMA as a legitimate sport with educated and well spoken participants. There is no reason for the UFC  to have to push SPIKE programming during their broadcasts for the "honor" of being on their network. This ain't 2005 anymore.

 

#6: A softening of Dana White's imperialist business practices.


Chance of happening: 62% (in one form or another)

With the combined factors of 10% ownership by Flash Entertainment, the increased role of Lorenzo Fertitta, and the continued goal of growth and international expansion, I think that increased pressure might put a little bit more love into Dana's icy heart.

Reason:

Look, I love Dana white. Even the most hardened anti-zuffa zealot has got to admit that he is entertaining. Without his regular faux pas, his wonderfully un-corporate language and aesthetic, and lack of censoring between brain and mouth, MMA as we know it would be a much more dreary place. But in the interest of continued acceptance, mainstream coverage, and growth of the sport, Dana is going to have to give a few inches here and there. If the UFC continues the way it has so far, there will absolutely be a growth bottleneck at some point due to a combination of White's public persona and treatment of the media, among other things. I am not saying that this point will even be a measurable one, or that the sky isn't the limit for MMA and the UFC in particular. But major sports media outlets used to being given a certain amount of profesional courtesy and respect will not take well to White's heavy handed draconian media relationship. This will absolutely affect the speed at which MMA/UFC finds itself absorbed into mainstream sports culture, in the US in particular.

As well, any practices that hurt the fighters that are the backbone of this sport leaves a bad taste in my mouth (The sponsorship "tribute" to the UFC coffers, for example). While things like this are not exactly unusual business practices, with Zuffa being essentially the only realistic option for top tier fighters anymore, the only thing stopping MMA from becoming a feudal enterprise is Dana's loyalty and generosity. Undisclosed backstage bonuses, FOTN/Submission/Knockout bonuses and PPV cuts prove that Dana can be a generous baldfather. But Dana, lets make sure that generosity and altruism extends to fighters on the undercard too.

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

Comment 30 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I disagree somewhat about Spike and the UFC

Any UFC thing that goes on any non-SpikeTV network(Ion and Versus) does terribly compared to Spike. SpikeTV is pretty much “the UFC Channel” on many nights. Unless they are gonna get a major network deal or something with ESPN then the UFC needs SpikeTV as much as Spike needs them.

by HaterSlayer on Apr 17, 2011 4:46 AM EDT reply actions  

I bet

they could turn some other channel into the “UFC channel” it would just take time

by dbcb on Apr 17, 2011 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I wouldn’t be surprised if they simply created a UFC channel, added a bunch of garbage shows to fill out the non-UFC programming, and just destroyed Spike with it.

What's this war in the heart of nature? Why does nature vie with itself? The land contend with the sea? Is there an avenging power in nature? Not one power, but two?

by Kwisatz Haderach on Apr 17, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

If knees on the ground were legal it would benefit wrestlers more than anyone else. Wrestlers will not lay underneath if someone sprawls, they will back out like they have done their entire life before mma. Wrestlers will use more snap downs, and you will see more mark coleman brutal like kos. I’ve spoken to many fighters in all organizations, and most FIGHTERS agree that wrestlers have enough of an advantage in a cage already with out allowing them to knee their downed opponent in the head.

by psuwrestler99 on Apr 17, 2011 9:25 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

It would seem most fighters need to improve their wrestling.

A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and gets to bed at night, and in between he does what he wants to do.

by Obviously5Believers on Apr 17, 2011 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

GOOD wrestlers would benefitt greatly from the rule change. Mediocre fighters with average wrestling would find themselves looking for nice safe office jobs.

by Lodz on Apr 17, 2011 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree they need a UFC Channel, and Spike would be best. 24/7 fighting , and that’s it.

I agree with knees to the head. A wrestler who gets stuffed on a takedown should pay. But let’s not forget that the wrestler in North South, is going to get a lot of damage done. Now, the thing is, the wrestler actually has to pass guard to get to NS which opens up alot of options. Either way, it should be in the sport. But I will settle for knees on the stuffed opponent, and not one on his back…

Can’t we make that a rule? You cant knee a downed ( on his back ) opponent. If you are not on your back, your fair game? Meh…

Lot of good topics you brought up man, Kudos, I agree with nearly all of them…

by p123 on Apr 17, 2011 11:00 AM EDT reply actions  

I think a UFC channel has to be in the works. They are collecting quite a library of fights with all their acquisitions and it would be a perfect place to showcase BJJ tourneys, Judo competitions and so on.

by BJJDenver on Apr 17, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Thats a good idea about the individual sports aspect of it, never thought of that…

by p123 on Apr 17, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

For suggesting jiu jitsu tourneys

by trickthethaifighter on Apr 18, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not kneeing an opponent on their back..

if they could specify and effectively enforce that I would be all for it.

by Lodz on Apr 17, 2011 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

1-Not sure why so many people want to see this fight. Don’t be fooled by Diaz’s impressive run when considering GSP. GSP takes this fight easily. Now Overeem vs anyone I am on board with. While I think Diaz has looked amazing against SF guys, let’s face it, GSP is on another planet. Overeem I think is a different beast. He is the one who may be on another planet. Now let’s see. Ok I changed my mind, lol! Bring on Diaz vs GSP!

2-Good luck with that. It’s as if these are judges that are used to judging another sport or something…

3-Bring on the knees! Not only that, but let’s get rid of the stupid 3 point stance rule.

4-I’ve always been a fan of Fedor and I would love any kind of resurgence from him. I just don’t know that he is motivated or managed properly.

5-I wonder if being on trash tv like Spike actually hurts the way the UFC is viewed by the public?

6-Dana softened? No thanks! I love the ruthless, socially unacceptable Dana. While at times he makes me cringe, I find him very interesting. Maybe he’s my train wreck? I’m afraid a softening of his style would make him less passionate and that is one thing I don’t want to diminish.

by BJJDenver on Apr 17, 2011 11:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed. GSP/Diaz might not even be competitive. But it is our best option. It’s either Diaz/GSP or FItch/Penn vs GSP. And I much have the former than the latter…

Judges need to see the tv coverage! That’s the only issue really…

by p123 on Apr 17, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, i think GSP dominates better fighters than Diaz, but it would be interesting and I definitely don’t want to see GSP vs Fitch ever again, lol. Plus, Diaz probably deserves the shot.

by BJJDenver on Apr 17, 2011 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

The whole champion vs champion sell is easy. Not to mention WW being cleaned out and no other contenders on the short term horizon, the match is literally a no brainer.

Funny how we just discount a possible Shields victory in all of this huh? I truly hope Shields goes on to LNP GSP/Silva just for kicks.. Lol..

by p123 on Apr 17, 2011 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

on purely anecdotal evidence just in my own conversations, I can confirm that Spikes other programming tarnishes the UFC’s brand by transitive property. When I was in camp last year, having supper with a couple older guys I mentioned that there was a fight night on spike that night and all I heard back was how Manswers was the stupidest thing they had ever seen. These guys might not have been the UFC’s target demographic, but the fact that they immediately associated the UFC with mental retardation I find somewhat telling.

by Lodz on Apr 17, 2011 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

IMO the only thing that has a chance of happening on your list

is #1.

I like the others, just don’t think they’ll happen.

Matt Janecek
MBA Candidate, 2011
An MBA on MMA: mixed martial arts thru the lens of business
mba-mma.blogspot.com

by mjanecek on Apr 17, 2011 12:21 PM EDT reply actions  

I applaud you for 2 and 5,

the rest.. well shit ill rec the whole damn thing, it was good. Dropping Spike is I think an imperative for the UFC soon. The rest of the channel is all gimmick programming with one common theme: violence. If Zuffa wants to escape that mentality they need to keep up with the sports channels. Seeing MMA on Sportsnet for TUF and UFCOV was refreshing

If you wanna throw down in fisticuffs, fine! I've got Jack Johnson and Tom O'Leary waitin' for ya...right here!

by ODBasyoucansee on Apr 17, 2011 11:33 PM EDT reply actions  

PS

Ive been hoping for GSP Diaz since Diaz/ Lawler and GSP / Mayhem. You aint the only one buddeh

If you wanna throw down in fisticuffs, fine! I've got Jack Johnson and Tom O'Leary waitin' for ya...right here!

by ODBasyoucansee on Apr 17, 2011 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks man...

good to know I am not the only one.

by Lodz on Apr 18, 2011 12:37 AM EDT reply actions  

meant to respond to the post above.

by Lodz on Apr 18, 2011 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

good post...

1) I’d like either of those fights…but i agree with most that GSP destroys him, most likely with wrestling and then that would prob be followed by a diaz rant about how GSP was afraid to “fight” him. Mad props to Diaz i think he is great and prob the most entertaining WW at the moment but GSP overall is on another level. Seein Reem in the UFC would be so f’n awesome. Would love to see him against cain or jds.

2) To me the system itself can stay, however, i think new judges specifically trained to judge MMA should be brought in or have ec-fighters (ex. Almeida has expressed interest). Also simply giving them monitors would help alot, allowing them to see a lot more. Oh and i think judges shouldn’t be afraid to score a round 10-10 if it is extremely close. No need to give a round to someone just for the hell of it.

3) As you said this won’t happen anytime in the future…i like the idea of allowing it in other positions other than an opponent on their back though, i think that would be a good start. As fun as i think this rule change would be for having more fights finished, this one is currently on the backburner of issues UFC is dealing with but hopefully someday it will come to fruition.

4) Me and my buddy have had this discussions many times in the last cpl of yrs. Both of us agreed we would love to see Fedor in the 205 division. If he dropped down, got in shape and was motivated i can see him being a definite title contender. I believe his skills are still there, just the HW division is not for him anymore…its too hard for him to contend with guys bigger than him who have similar skills. I know the argument can be made bout JDS and Cain being “small” HW but they are also younger, hungrier, in better physical condition and more adapted to the ever changing HW division. Fedor can get back to greatness with a drop down to LHW in my honest opinion.

5) I would love to see a UFC channel…but as for spike i really dont care or have an opinion on this matter one way or the other. As long as i get to see any UFC programming and events then im fine with it being on any channel…as long as i get sans channel haha

great post though man, one of the better/discussion oriented fan posts iv read in the last little while…i liked the variety of topics instead of just a focus on one.

by gpl_03 on Apr 18, 2011 12:58 AM EDT reply actions  

i honestly think Alistair cares more about getting the UFC belt than fighting in K-1

He already achieved his goals of getting the Strikeforce, DREAM, and K-1 belts, its only logical that his next step would be UFC belt

by darkotto23 on Apr 18, 2011 4:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Knees to the head and Soccer kicks to the head

Would love to see them both brought back to the sport (brought to the UFC anyway); but, like you said, the last thing MMA needs right now is more ammo for the do-gooders while it’s trying to get sanctioned still.

by High Knee Destroyer on Apr 18, 2011 8:13 AM EDT reply actions  

No desire at all for soccer kicks to the head, which would never be allowed anyway.

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 19, 2011 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

They just need to allow all varieties of up-kicks, and redefine what qualifies as a “downed opponent” so putting your hand on the ground doesn’t defend you from knees.

I also had the thought that they should add a rule: a fighter’s elbow must travel at least six inches (or something) before hitting the head of a downed opponent. Or just make it illegal to rub the point of the elbow on someone’s face. I think we could allow elbows to the head on the ground while still preventing those terrible cutting techniques. Does anyone agree or would a rule like that leave too much to the referee’s discretion?

Is it possible for an administrator to change my handle? I want it to be "Genki Pseudonym." I just thought of that myself.

by Bolshevik on Apr 23, 2011 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I'm working on the intricacies of details of maneuvers that he still doesn't even know the names of." - Frank Mir

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chilli_pickle_283g_hot_small
Junior Dos Santos' Worst UFC Win is Stefan Struve
Wario_small
BECW3 UFC 146 Recap & Live Post discussion
Wario_small
BECW3 UFC 146 Live Post
Madmen_icon_small
Dan Hardy: The Outlaw (Short documentary film)
Me_2_small
Farewell Frank Mir

Recent FanPosts

Small
Rafael Lovato Jr. on Open Mat Radio
Small
The Most Valuable Non-UFC Fighters
Small
USA chants during ufc fights!?!?!?!?!?
220px-johnnycash1969_small
Fighters you aren't sold on ?
Small
Duane Ludwig's chasm...ouch
Rousimar-palhares-picture_small
An Appeal to SBNation
Lebowski_excited_grin_small
Top 5 Potential Replacements for Vitor Belfort Against Wanderlei Silva
Obp_small
Help me get a job

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings