Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Strikeforce Sponsor in Trouble as Government Attacks Online Poker

Full Tilt Poker in Strikeforce - Photo by Esther Lin, Zuffa LLC/Getty Images

Yesterday, the Department of Justice seized the domains of the three largest online poker sites servicing U.S. customers - Poker Stars, Full Tilt Poker, and Absolute Poker.

The origins of the story can be traced back to late 2006, when a rider was attached to a bill on port security in the waning moments of Congressional legislation. The rider made it illegal to conduct financial transactions with businesses involved with Internet gambling.

It caused a minor crisis in the gambling community, but the dust eventually settled, and things continued, as Dana White would say, business as usual.

Now, despite insisting that playing on their sites breaks no laws, the major poker sites have suspended real money play for U.S. customers. Eleven people involved with the sites have been charged with violating U.S. gambling laws, and federal prosecutors are seeking to recover "at least $3 billion" stemming from money laundering chargers, according to Reuters.

The government's decision to attack these sites has a myriad of indirect and unintended consequences, including taking money out of the MMA economy. Gambling sites are currently banned in the UFC (despite brief appearances in 2008-2009), but Full Tilt Poker has been a major sponsor for Strikeforce, appearing on both the cage canvas and the shorts of a majority of Strikeforce's fighters. The Full Tilt logo also had a presence in many of the regional promotions across North America.

MMA agent Ken Pavia explained the impact to MMA Junkie:

"The online poker companies don't have a complete handle on it at this time, but they're doing their due diligence to find out what the full impact is," Pavia said. "In the short-term, it will severely impact fighters' sponsor revenue, which traditionally matched their show pay for our televised clients. I would venture to say the poker industry is equal to apparel industry as the No. 1 sponsor of fighters outside the UFC."

The article later quotes Jason Genet, who explains that the sponsorships are for companies' .net domains. The distinction being that the .net are for "educational" and "entertainment" purposes only, and do not offer real money play. That being said, it takes no stretch of the imagination to conclude that these sites were created to bypass advertising restrictions. (Though I should note that these sites have not been seized by the government.)

Regardless of the distinction, it's hard to imagine Full Tilt Poker continuing to throw money at promotions and fighters without a customer base in this country. 

Comment 143 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Bloody Elbow

Comments

Display:

I got a crazy story!

My good friends dad just got arrested by the FBI friday morning over this online gambling shit!

"Cry in the dojo. Laugh on the battlefield"

by lawdawgfightcrew on Apr 16, 2011 1:01 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

What was the reason for his arrest?

by devious1 on Apr 16, 2011 1:05 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not sure yet something to do with breaking some accounting laws and using some loo-polls that were still considered illegal. He was running one of the poker sites money through his bank. Its pretty messed up he has some serious charges against him. Its never a good sign when the FBI show up for ya.

"Cry in the dojo. Laugh on the battlefield"

by lawdawgfightcrew on Apr 16, 2011 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

fucking loo-polls…

I was one of the authors of the Port Huron Statement.

by Grappo on Apr 16, 2011 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Designated voting stations located in British bathrooms?

You know Joe, Brandon Vera is considered to be a Heavyweight George St.Pierre because he just comes, comes, and comes again... -Mike Goldberg, UFC 57

Cheick Kongo looks like a cross between Evander Holyfield and pop singer Seal!
Melvin Guilard looks like a little Kevin Randelman!
-Mike "All black people look alike to me" Goldberg, UFC 62/64

by Jonnycaz2.0 on Apr 17, 2011 4:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

So what's the problem here?

Full Tilt won’t be able to continue sponsoring MMA fighters & promotions because they won’t have the revenue from real money poker games?

http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 16, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

they’ll still have some from international people, but there’s no real point in advertising in the US when they can’t get customers from there.

by Phildo on Apr 16, 2011 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ahh, bummer.

I don’t even get the point of it, anyways. Why shouldn’t people be able to play online poker for money if they want to? It’s asinine.

http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 16, 2011 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Fuck em.

http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 16, 2011 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

The same reason why marijuana is still illegal even though it only harms the user. The government doesn’t make any money off of it and has the power to deem it illegal based on that fact alone. I love the world.

by AHutch on Apr 16, 2011 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t be foolish. Marijuana does no harm to the user

by inthepipes on Apr 16, 2011 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's asinine is that these companies based in the Cayman islands

have made billions over the past decade or so without paying a red cent to the U.S. Treasury, all so some modern-day puritans could prove a point. If they were to license and regulate online poker, it would be a nice revenue lift for something people already do.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Dave Strummer on Apr 16, 2011 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

there are some very smart politicians who have been saying the same thing

Managing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 16, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

There was a bill introduced just a couple weeks ago to liscense it

but I doubt it’ll go anywhere in the current climate.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Dave Strummer on Apr 16, 2011 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another issue is that while they will try to tax companies like this one to death as soon as possible, other companies with much higher revenues go virtually untaxed due to incentives and loopholes…….(or loo-polls depending on where you’re from.)

by OmoPlata on Apr 17, 2011 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

The funny thing about that is that while it is the Christian right behind these sorts of prohibitions, there is nothing in the bible whatsoever that they base this false belief that gambling is a sin on.

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 16, 2011 2:58 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

That's because

There is nothing in the bible that prohibits gambling or prostitution for that matter.

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are numerous references to prostitution as sin and prostitutes as sinners, but nothing about any sort of gambling, although a great many imagine it to be so. Kind of like the misconception that the bible says satan resides in hell…

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 16, 2011 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not in the Old Testament.

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I made no such limitation on my comment, but…

An argument can be made that under the Law (i.e. in Old Testament times) that sex between a non-married man and a non-married prostitute, while against God’s desires for people, is not sin per se, because sin then was defined as specifically requiring atonement in the form of a blood sacrifice.

It is a specious argument imo, but it can be made.

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 16, 2011 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because gambling is naughty.

Unless (here in NY) you’re betting on horse racing, then it’s OK since that is run by the mob….er, NYRA…..and that money gets laundered…er, transferred, back to the state so guys like Spitzer can pay for high-brow hookers…er, ROADS yeah roads and bridges that’s what I meant.

by OmoPlata on Apr 17, 2011 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lottery anyone...

gambling in the purest sense of the word – absolutely zero skill involved.

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 17, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

The good thing about it

The good thing about it is that we won’t see those huge and ugly FullTilt logos on fighters shorts at Strikeforce.

I wish death upon no one, but not all deserve to live.

by spookon3 on Apr 16, 2011 1:07 PM EDT reply actions  

How can this be a good thing? Sponsors is a secondary income for fighters. With the government unnecessarily cracking down on these web sites, and without their presence in the ring and on fighters shorts that’s taking food off of some fighters table as an extra source of income

So again, how is this a good thing?

by devious1 on Apr 16, 2011 1:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

what about the UFC? why are you giving them a free pass? if they had allowed these sites to advertise at their events, it would have generated income for UFC fighters too. make no mistake about it, the UFC banning these sites was not a morality play. they were banned because the guys who own zuffa also own several casinos. a little off topic, but one more case of zuffa screwing thier fighters for one reason and one reason only: pure greed.

by tha dude on Apr 16, 2011 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is actually completely wrong. The fertitas were looking to get in with them, the ban was handed down from spike, they were not comfortable with the .net/.com distinction and wanted it off TV. It was easier for the UFC to ban the poker sites than to allow them for ppvs and then blur them out on spike.

by Phildo on Apr 16, 2011 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because you never see poker shows on Spike.

Except all those times you do.

Koscheck has frosted tips.

by Ozzz on Apr 17, 2011 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

The distinction being that the .net are for “educational” and “entertainment” purposes only, and do not offer real money play.

Are we sure about this? My dad plays lots of tournaments at pokerstars and when we were talking about this he was telling me real money games are still in play for non-Americans.

"Who are you and how the hell did you get in here?"
"I'm a locksmith... and i'm a locksmith."

by Goonisis on Apr 16, 2011 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

The .net sites only offer play money games. The .com sites offer the real money games, which are still offered to non-Americans.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

That doesn’t seem correct.

When i go to the .coms from Canada i get an FBI seizure notice (this: http://i.imgur.com/alJBw.png). And i know the .nets have at least freeroll tournaments that have real cash prizes.

"Who are you and how the hell did you get in here?"
"I'm a locksmith... and i'm a locksmith."

by Goonisis on Apr 16, 2011 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup, as I understand it, the sites were shutdown worldwide.

by Ogueira on Apr 16, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure what you’re confused about here. The government seized the .com addresses. Everyone, regardless of country, will see the FBI notice. You can still access PokerStars at PokerStars.eu. (Full Tilt can be accessed at FullTiltPoker.co.uk)

If an American tries to sit at a real money table, they get an error message. They can’t play.

And a freeroll for real money is not the same thing as a real money game. The player isn’t risking anything in a freeroll.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

“If an American tries to sit at a real money table, they get an error message. They can’t play.”

I should explain that Americans can still fire up the software clients. They just can’t do anything.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

The distinction being that the .net are for “educational” and “entertainment” purposes only, and do not offer real money play.

This part mostly. I’m almost certain you can play real money games at the .net versions of these sites. At least Pokerstars.

But i did misread your original response. I thought you were saying the .coms were still offered to non-American, not just cash games. My mistake.

"Who are you and how the hell did you get in here?"
"I'm a locksmith... and i'm a locksmith."

by Goonisis on Apr 16, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

you can’t, you are just wrong. The only thing you can do for real money on .net sites is freeroll tournaments. They do not even have a section for “real money,” if you download the software from a .net site.

by Phildo on Apr 16, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re wrong dude. You can’t.

Still a Beer Monster.

http://www.instrength.com

by Tim Burke on Apr 16, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know

More than one guys that actually won big money on these sites here in the US. I think many of them list there companies in Gibraltar which gives some sort of a safe haven.

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

They’re all over the globe.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not really. Poker is still big business in Europe and other places.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can only assume but isn’t most of their business comes from the US?

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I mean, this hurts, but they’ve been shifting focus to Europe and abroad since 2006. If this is indeed a ploy by American interests to neutralize them while poker regulation is legislated here, then, yeah, they might be fucked. But they’re still going to be profitable without the American market.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

As far as I know, two have been arrested, one has turned himself in, and eight others are outside the country.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

That said, a lot of people believe they’ll beat the gambling charges.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it looks bad.

The charges aren’t gambling but money laundering. Creating shell companies to process transactions, etc.

by ecost on Apr 16, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

The individuals are being charged with violating US gambling laws. The companies are being targeted for money laundering. That’s how I read the Reuters article.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I haven’t read the Reuters feed, you may be right.

by ecost on Apr 16, 2011 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well this is even worse
New York prosecutors say they’ve issued restraining orders against more than 75 bank accounts in 14 countries used by the poker companie

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

according to Forbes the US is only about 25% of the online poker industry.

Although, I don’t know who has what market share in Europe and elsewhere

by ecost on Apr 16, 2011 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

interesting I thought it was more like 60%

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

idk, maybe that before the 2006 law chased companies out of the US

by ecost on Apr 16, 2011 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

online poker doesn’t allow people to steal copywrited material.

And, brick and mortar poker is allowed in California because it has been declared a game of skill.

by ecost on Apr 16, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

The difference is that online poker will probably be legalized in the US eventually and it is already legal in Europe and other places.

Stealing copywrited material will never be legal.

by ecost on Apr 16, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

well sure, when you phrase it like that it won't be!

but i think you are going to come to find that as technology increases, and the corporations who own these copyrights, copyright infringement via the internet is going to be less and less containable.

by Body Triangle on Apr 16, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

we may very well see significant changes in copywrite law because of that

by ecost on Apr 16, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're right but

with this crackdown I don’t see online gambling being legalized in the US very soon.

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Every time they've cracked down on online poker

the companies have found a way around it. We may very well see them crop up again with foreign domains.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Dave Strummer on Apr 16, 2011 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fricking libs wasting our time and tax dollars on shutting this down. Where’s the jobs? So much for hope and change.

by Matt Benson on Apr 16, 2011 1:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Pay

Pay lip service… Although I guess play is close enough for government work.

by High Knee Destroyer on Apr 16, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see what you mean but I see it as the opposite

I think republicans pay lip service to the midwestern values vote, but in reality are all about making markets as “free” (where free means entirely favoring the corporate side of the economy) as they can. it’s really just all a design to get the undereducated midwestern values vote.

Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.

by Kidroll on Apr 16, 2011 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Frist was certifiably insane

If he thought he’d sniff the White House after diagnosing Terry Schaivo on the Senate floor having never met her.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Contributor for CagesideSeats.com and Bloody Elbow Radio
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Apr 16, 2011 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bubububububububububububub

You know Joe, Brandon Vera is considered to be a Heavyweight George St.Pierre because he just comes, comes, and comes again... -Mike Goldberg, UFC 57

Cheick Kongo looks like a cross between Evander Holyfield and pop singer Seal!
Melvin Guilard looks like a little Kevin Randelman!
-Mike "All black people look alike to me" Goldberg, UFC 62/64

by Jonnycaz2.0 on Apr 17, 2011 4:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Phael, is that you?

http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 16, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fuckin' derppin it.

And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
SaberCats Examiner | SB Nation Bay Area | Niners Nation | Twitter

by James Brady on Apr 16, 2011 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where's the jobs?

Ask the Republican controlled house, which hasn’t put through a jobs bill since taking over.

Koscheck has frosted tips.

by Ozzz on Apr 17, 2011 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah saw this piece of news on CNN yesterday.

this what happens when greed gets to ya. pretty sure the top brass guys for these poker companies knew this was going to happen sooner or later. some of them haven’t been caught yet cause they’re out of the country.

by daftshadow on Apr 16, 2011 1:26 PM EDT reply actions  

there are definitely lots of hands in the pie now. A big site, Party poker left the US when the bill passed in 2006 and paid a huge fine. They surely wouldn’t mind if things got legalized in the US while the biggest companies that stayed in the US were having big issues.

Also, the biggest people pushing against online poker regulation have been other gambling interests, worried that they will lose business. If the big fish are out of commission, they will have a better chance to move onto the online poker world if/when it gets fully regulated.

by Phildo on Apr 16, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yep

In my experience, this is exactly how such things work. Why engage in competition with other businesses in your industry when you can simply collude with the government to establish barriers to entry and/or put them right out of business. If your government has enormous latitude in regulating commerce (as the US government certainly does), the incentive to collude with government is greatly increased and the already established businesses with the most capital see their relative power skyrocket at the expense of the smaller guys. Very unfortunate.

by High Knee Destroyer on Apr 16, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

One of the Fertittas (I believe Lorenzo) was on the NSAC board when SEG tried to get the sport regulated. The commission rejected regulation, SEG crumbled, and Zuffa picked up the scraps.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Jesus

Such is the way of the world, huh? Depressing.

by High Knee Destroyer on Apr 16, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was Lorenzo. And the claims by Bob Meyrowitz, that Lorenzo sabotaged their efforts at regulation in Nevada, have been thoroughly discredited (at least the version that Meyrowitz’s tellst). What hasn’t been discredited is the idea that Lorenzo had inside knowledge that it would be sanctioned, and perhaps even pushed for sanctioning with his old commission members, knowing it would thus be back on ppv before choosing to buy the UFC at a bargain.

by John Nash on Apr 16, 2011 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's cut throat business

Lorenzo claims he had nothing to do with it, but I think that you should do anything legal within your power to give your business an edge. Not depressing at all.

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to say the allegations are true in this case but you don’t have a problem with those working in positions of public trust using their positions and influence for personal gain?

by John Nash on Apr 16, 2011 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I didn't want to imply that

If true it’s obviously against the law and he should be punished But I don’t have any problem with using whatever tools you have to further your business.We have lobbyist that push their business agendas all the time. As a business owner I will use legal ways I can and step over any competitor to get more business.

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I somewhat disagree with you here. As a business owner myself I have no problem with anyone engaging in business practices that are amoral. it is when they engage in business practices that are immoral, even if they are not illegal, that I have a problem. Breaking the trust and ethics you pledged to be uphold on a committee for your own advantage is immoral.

Lets put it this way: if you’re business is making pornography, I won’t hold that against you. If you go about recruiting actresses by specifically looking for abused, barely 18-year old runaways or those with mental illness i’m going to call you out for doing so – even though it might not be illegal.

by John Nash on Apr 16, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you feel for example that Howard Stern’s use of the Wack Pack as part of his show and by that promoting his business is wrong? Or the use of odd people in freak shows? I’m against the use of animals for any purpose of entrainment. I can relate to that. But in business against other competitors its not the same .I will try in any means to point out my competitors flows in front of potential clients, I will use any verified information to discredit them. Will pull any strings I can and lobby myself to potentially get a contract or a client even if it means using my past contacts or positions in a legal way. I see it all the time bidding for government contracts,

by Coeman on Apr 16, 2011 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

One of the Fertittas (I believe Lorenzo) was on the NSAC board when SEG tried to get the sport regulated.

Not true.

Lorenzo stepped down from his position at NSAC well before SEG approached them for sanctioning. He may have pulled some strings behind the curtain, but he was not on the commission at that time and there is a public record of the meeting minutes that shows was not in attendance during the petition by SEG or for the final vote.

by Steve4192 on Apr 16, 2011 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s not all the details either though. Lorenzo was a member in April of 1999 when SEG had a public meeting with the NSAC to look into sanctioning. The investigation phase was under way when Lorenzo left the NSAC in July of 2000. Lorenzo then contacted Meyrowitz later in the year to inquire about purchasing them after hearing they may be interested in selling. Zuffa bought the UFC in Jan of 2001 and in 2001 Nevada ( with Marc Rattner, current Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for the UFC, presiding as the Director of NSAC at this time) sanctioned the sport guaranteeing it would be available on ppv.
There are so many questions that could really shade our view of the purchase.
- When did Lorenzo learn that SEG was in financial difficulty or would be looking to sell?
- Why did sanctioning take 2 years after their original meeting and only cleared after Zuffa purchased the UFC?
- Did Lorenzo know that the NSAC was going to sanction MMA?
- Did anyone delay the sanctioning process?
So many questions we’ll probably never get the answers to.

by John Nash on Apr 16, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

That would be cool if real life was like in the cartoons where the bad guy spills his world domination plans early.

by pud333 on Apr 16, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

As you seem to know, that is how regulated and/or licensed business works just about everywhere.

This is part of the reason why I said from the beginning that Sonnen was SOL in Nevada for a long time, unless he made a huge and ongoing public retraction & mea culpa.

Real business doesn’t occur in the light of day.

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 16, 2011 3:11 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

- Who gives a shit?

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Contributor for CagesideSeats.com and Bloody Elbow Radio
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Apr 16, 2011 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re nice and friendly today.

Still a Beer Monster.

http://www.instrength.com

by Tim Burke on Apr 16, 2011 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now, now, you know Derek worships at his alter to DFW, anything remotely casting the UFC in a negative light, regardless of truth, is treated this way. In his favor, at least he is honest about his total supplication to all things DFW and, by extension, all things Zuffa.

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 16, 2011 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Everytime I see a reference to DFW, I wonder why people love Dallas Fort Worth airport so much for a second. I think I travel too much.

Still a Beer Monster.

http://www.instrength.com

by Tim Burke on Apr 16, 2011 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m going to start banning people who have obviously never read Total MMA.

by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 16, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh come on...

Subo isn’t that bad…

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 16, 2011 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe if you provided free copies for us, we'd be more likely to read it...

[grovels]

@scb0212
The Machiavellian.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Apr 16, 2011 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Give yourself some wiggle room Mike

Similar to how the Fertitta brothers purportedly bought the UFC.

by John Nash on Apr 16, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

The big casino companies already have a bill in Congress to regulate online gambling

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-1174

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Dave Strummer on Apr 16, 2011 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

So if I understand the details (great discussion in this forum!)…it looks like the gov’t will essentially ban these companies from the U.S., fine them heavily, then regulate online gambling just in time for the already-entrenched casino industry to swoop in and chow down on some carrion, and make a fortune. Wow.

by OmoPlata on Apr 17, 2011 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

That is pretty much how it works…

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 17, 2011 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

What is absolutely astounding, however

is that the online casinos basically ratted out to the Feds the one guy who could take them all down. Then he flips on them and gets them all put out of business. Here’s the story I’m referring to: Meet The Boy Genius Who Just Took Down The Online Poker Industry

It’s been rumored that the only reason the FBI got their hands on him is because Full Tilt or Poker Stars (the companies he used to work for and stole from) tipped off the FBI that he was going to be traveling to the United States last year.

Reading that story, it’s quite clear that there truly is no honor among thieves! Hahahaha

by High Knee Destroyer on Apr 16, 2011 1:33 PM EDT reply actions  

That’s fascinating. I could see it as a movie; The Social Network meets Casino.

by John Nash on Apr 16, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

I haven’t read the article yet but thanks for the link

by ecost on Apr 16, 2011 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dont get this

I know its trendy to turn against the government for just about anything these days but really? have you seen the bribery scheme they are accused of? You don’t need to be a lawyer to know what they did is unambiguously illegal.
I play poker online casually but come on…

by Broseidon on Apr 16, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

just leaving this here if that not clear enough
By late 2009, after U.S. banks and financial institutions detected and shut down multiple fraudulent bank accounts used by the Poker Companies, SCHEINBERG and BITAR [owners of Stars and FTP respectively] developed a new processing strategy that would not involve lying to banks. PokerStars, FullTilt Poker, and their payment processors persuaded the principals of a few small, local banks facing financial difficulties to engage in such processing in return for multi-million dollar investments in the banks. For example, in September 2009, ELIE [a payment processor] and others approached defendant JOHN CAMPOS, the Vice Chairman of the Board and part-owner of SunFirst Bank, a small, private bank based in Saint George, Utah, about processing Internet poker transactions. While expressing “trepidations,” CAMPOS allegedly agreed to process gambling transactions in return for a $10 million investment in SunFirst by ELIE and an associate, which would give them a more than 30% ownership stake in the bank. CAMPOS also requested and received a $20,000 “bonus” for his assistance. In an e-mail, one of ELIE’s associates boasted that they had “purchased” SunFirst and that they “were looking to purchase” “a grand total of 3 or 4 banks” to process payments.

and

Because U.S. banks and credit card issuers were largely unwilling to process their payments, the Poker Companies allegedly used fraudulent methods to circumvent federal law and trick these institutions into processing payments on their behalf. For example, defendants ISAI SCHEINBERG and PAUL TATE of PokerStars, RAYMOND BITAR and NELSON BURTNICK of Full Tilt Poker, and SCOTT TOM and BRENT BECKLEY of Absolute Poker, arranged for the money received from U.S. gamblers to be disguised as payments to hundreds of non-existent online merchants purporting to sell merchandise such as jewelry and golf balls.

by Broseidon on Apr 16, 2011 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's also worth mentioning that the Fertittas (Station Casinos) agreed to buy into Full Tilt

Fortunately for them, the deal was contingent upon federal regulation of online poker in the U.S.

by Ogueira on Apr 16, 2011 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

The Wynn had a similar arrangement with PokerStars as well.

by Mike Fagan on Apr 16, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

big thing everyone is over looking

Is Pavia’s statement that these sites typically sponsor fighters by matching show money. That’s huge chunk of change for fighters and it kinda reveals a little about how much some fighters really make.

by Discman2 on Apr 16, 2011 3:15 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I wondered about that too. He also mentioned the apparel companies as being similar in amount. Does that mean these guys are getting essentially double or more of their show money as sponsorship pay? If so, that’s a bit of a revelation to me, based on what I’d read before.

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 16, 2011 3:20 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Probably along those lines yeah. Depends on the fighter, of course. And his tv time. But if a guy gets paid 20 to show and is sponsored by Full Tilt, which is common in SF, and then has apparel behind them like affliction. thats around 60 just to show. I mean if we are just going by 20k for each major sponsor. This is all hearsay but it sheds some light as to what some fighters make off sponsors.

by Discman2 on Apr 16, 2011 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

When you’re built on dirty money, your number one goal is save a little for yourself and spend every other dime making more of it. The “double money” thing is only for these billion dollar online entities.

And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
SaberCats Examiner | SB Nation Bay Area | Niners Nation | Twitter

by James Brady on Apr 16, 2011 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pavia implied that the apparel companies paid similarly…oh wait, I just realized what I wrote there…

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne
Death before dishonor, drinks before lunch.

by The American Ronin on Apr 16, 2011 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is just my speculation, obviously, but I’d think that figure is pretty far of. When it comes to the other bits though (the gambling companies), I can see them easily just doubling a fighter’s pay

And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
SaberCats Examiner | SB Nation Bay Area | Niners Nation | Twitter

by James Brady on Apr 16, 2011 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

i’ve heard that number thrown about before, but who knows when it comes to this stuff.

by Phildo on Apr 16, 2011 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

In a time when government spending is through the roof it isn’t surprising that they would crack down on a business that allows people to make money tax-free. Even though taxes are a scam to begin with.(Personal aside)

by inthepipes on Apr 16, 2011 4:07 PM EDT reply actions  

The government needs money

So they are going to start shaking people down like the mob lol.

by mikeI981j on Apr 16, 2011 4:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Sucks…I’m a full tilt player.

'Ello G'vnor!

by IHateMMA on Apr 16, 2011 4:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Can't you still play

on the .net website? Or did you play for green.

http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 16, 2011 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Real money.

'Ello G'vnor!

by IHateMMA on Apr 16, 2011 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's pretty dumb if you ask me.

I don’t see why the gov’t should have any say in whether we gamble or not.

http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 17, 2011 2:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

This really sucks that it affects the fighters, and all the people who used it.

But they’ve (the company) been knowingly breaking the law and not trying to make their practice legal. Bank fraud, money laundering, etc … all of that without supporting the bills to pass such things with a lot of support, solely because they make more money and pay less tax when it’s illegal.

Really though, it should just be legalized, there’s no reason for it to not be. More tax money for the government, too.

And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
SaberCats Examiner | SB Nation Bay Area | Niners Nation | Twitter

by James Brady on Apr 16, 2011 5:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Just like the fighters...

I rely a lot of my income from online poker. How does it makes sense that govt would reward Wall Street with billions of our tax dollars and classify online poker players as criminals? It sucks b/c the fighters will lose out on a lot of money just like us full time poker players, who have done nothing wrong. Why would govt care what I do with my own money, on own time, at home nonetheless? The reason why I play online poker is b/c I got laid off from Wall Streets criminal actions and they are denying me of making money from something so harmless.

by Withdrawal on Apr 16, 2011 6:19 PM EDT reply actions  

2 Messages when I tried to log in to my Full tilt account. I have to drive to AC/Foxwoods/Parx :(

MESSAGE 1
Full Tilt Poker™ Supports Poker Players And Its Chief Executive

Dublin Ireland (April 15, 2011)- Full Tilt Poker is saddened by today’s charges against its CEO Raymond Bitar and offers its full support to Mr. Bitar and Nelson Burtnick.

Online poker is a game of skill enjoyed by tens of millions of people in the United States and across the world. And, Full Tilt Poker remains as committed as ever to preserving the rights of those players to play the game they love online.

Mr. Bitar and Full Tilt Poker believe online poker is legal – a position also taken by some of the best legal minds in the United States. Full Tilt Poker is, and has always been committed to preserving the integrity of the game and abiding by the law.

“I am surprised and disappointed by the government’s decision to bring these charges. I look forward to Mr. Burtnick’s and my exoneration,” said Mr. Bitar.

Unfortunately, as a result of this action, Full Tilt Poker has decided that it must suspend "real money" play in the United States until this case is resolved. However, Full Tilt Poker will continue to provide peer-to-peer online poker services outside of the United States.

For more information, please call +442032877138

About Full Tilt Poker

Full Tilt Poker™ is the host of a worldwide virtual poker cardroom service. It is not in the business of betting or wagering and does not participate in the games as a player. It merely provides a service to those who wish to test their skills against others for fun, prizes or money. It is duly regulated and licensed by the Alderney Gambling Control Commission. With innovative graphics, superior customer service and a safe, secure interface, the software is geared to enhance and personalize the online poker experience. Although virtual poker is legal where the games are hosted and played, it may not be legal where individual players are located.

MESSAGE 2

We regret to announce that players located within the United States can no longer play for real money on Full Tilt Poker.

We would like to assure you that your funds are safe and secure. Please contact support@fulltiltpoker.co.uk for more information.

Please contact support@fulltiltpoker.co.uk for more information.

You gotta pay the troll toll to get into this boy's hole, you gotta pay the troll toll to get in.

by oousty on Apr 16, 2011 6:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I'm working on the intricacies of details of maneuvers that he still doesn't even know the names of." - Frank Mir

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chilli_pickle_283g_hot_small
Junior Dos Santos' Worst UFC Win is Stefan Struve
Wario_small
BECW3 UFC 146 Recap & Live Post discussion
Wario_small
BECW3 UFC 146 Live Post
Madmen_icon_small
Dan Hardy: The Outlaw (Short documentary film)
Me_2_small
Farewell Frank Mir

Recent FanPosts

Small
Rafael Lovato Jr. on Open Mat Radio
Small
The Most Valuable Non-UFC Fighters
Small
USA chants during ufc fights!?!?!?!?!?
220px-johnnycash1969_small
Fighters you aren't sold on ?
Small
Duane Ludwig's chasm...ouch
Rousimar-palhares-picture_small
An Appeal to SBNation
Lebowski_excited_grin_small
Top 5 Potential Replacements for Vitor Belfort Against Wanderlei Silva
Obp_small
Help me get a job

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings