Strikeforce, Tournaments and Transparency -- A Snark Fights Production
The upcoming Strikeforce heavyweight Grand Prix is the promotion's nuclear option.
In a year that finds the UFC short on matches that will make for pay-per-view blockbusters, Strikeforce has against all odds managed to wrangle their premier heavyweight talent into a tournament spread out over four high-profile events with the culminating round potentially marking the promotion's pay-per-view debut. Further upping the ante is Strikeforce CEO Scott Coker's relentless insistence that the tournament will come to a close in September of this year.
Continue Reading "Strikeforce, Tournaments and Transparency"
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
60 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It’s a question mark kick!
Sorry, couldn’t resist.
http://www.instrength.com
by Tim Burke on Jan 13, 2011 8:50 PM EST reply actions 7 recs
What kind of kick is this

Wolfgangsta @ www.ninjasplace.com
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 3:15 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
I wouldn’t say this if it wasn’t true: this guy’s blog is worth checking out.
by Jonathan Snowden on Jan 13, 2011 9:15 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Indeed
Follow Me!
http://twitter.com/#!/TheBeardedNerd
by BeardedNerd on Jan 15, 2011 12:18 AM EST up reply actions
good read, but here's what I think Coker has done.
By having a GP belt up for grabs, and not the SF HW belt proper, he’s building in a parachute for Overeem, and extending the publicity built from the ealry announcement. The 3 round format provides a convenient excuse for not having the real belt involved.
The tournament is tailor made to highlight the one advantage SF has over UFC, and that is the HW names in their stable.
If Fedor and company act up after the first event, he will be tossed out and replaced. He is still a fan favorite, but now that the luster has faded in the wake of the Werdum loss, he just doesn’t have the leverage to hold Coker’s feet over the fire.
With Overeem winning K1 and then Dream belts in such a short time, he’s the new face of SF. I can’t wait to see these matchups. It appears that all the hand picked opponent garbage is going away for at least a year, until either Overeem is cemented as the ulitmate champion of mma, or they have a new toy to play with and promote, should he be dethroned.
It’s going to be an interesting year.
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
George Carlin
Interesting piece, Tomas. Once major gripe though:
The end result is a brutally ironic media environment that sees the UFC benefit from their Draconian policies while Strikeforce suffers for generally respecting the media’s role.
I don’t see how this is ironic unless you’re implying that the UFC’s policies are so brutal because they feel like being bullies for no reason. It’s completely expected that their strict policies to control media result in them getting fluffier coverage than a competitor with less leverage. Is there a level I’m missing here, or are you talking Alannis Moressete style irony?
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
It's situational irony
Strikeforce attempts to gain media favor by playing nice and end up getting stepped on while a rival promotion that belittles serious media coverage at every turn gets a pass on many issues.
www.SnarkFights.com
www.Twitter.com/Tomas_Rios
Me write lots.
I guess that means Zuffa made the right decision.
The media likes to bitch about how Zuffa playing hardball is a mistake, but the proof is in the pudding. Zuffa’s tactics work. Being gigantic throbbing dicks towards the media gets them more favorable coverage than trying to be the media’s best buddy.
I guess that means Zuffa made the right decision.
Maybe in the sense that they control the message to hardcore fans. But I know for a certainty they have limited more mainstream coverage of the UFC by treating people this way. Look at Wertheim’s discussion of attempting to interview Joe Silva for the public version of how poorly real reporters respond to their bullying.
by Jonathan Snowden on Jan 14, 2011 9:45 AM EST up reply actions
Well that’s it. Lets cancel the tournament. No value left. None what so ever. Absolutely no one is interested.
You do realize my point is an ethical one, right?
As in, Strikeforce blatantly lied to their own consumers and are installing regulations for the GP that raise some deadly serious questions. I never advocated the cancellation of the tournament and maintain it’s a brilliant business move.
My only issue is with the execution thus far which has been somewhere between farcical and irresponsible.
www.SnarkFights.com
www.Twitter.com/Tomas_Rios
Me write lots.
As in, Strikeforce blatantly lied to their own consumers
Please point out where they blatantly lied? The five rounds? Coker has qualified that since his first announcement He never promised it once. He always said he would announce it was going to happen on the conference call which he did.
Are you talking about Josh Gross’s comment? Do you see Montreal or Toronto listed among the states he talked to? Coker said one of those is likely to get a leg of the tournament. Josh talked to some random states but did he talk to the ones SF is planning to go to? This is at least the third thing he has reported about the tournament that has been blatantly incorrect. His track record has gone in the shitter since he went to ESPN.
and are installing regulations for the GP that raise some deadly serious questions.
They aren’t installing regulations. They are putting in rules governing their tournament like every other promoter that holds tournaments does. If the ACs had regulations in place this wouldn’t be necessary. But then again I don’t want all tournaments to have to fit one mold.What works for one organization may not work for another due to different TV deals etc.
But lets look at the two pieces that are probably giving you gas. The first is a fourth judge to break a tie. The AC’s won’t provide a mechanism so what would you do in the case of a tie? Call the tournament off? I don’t have a great answer so I would like to hear suggestions. The 4th judge will not effect the official record and is only used to determine who moves forward. I would prefer if they were hiring some one who is qualified as a judge but the AC said they wouldn’t provide any one. So who?
The part where I think there is a bigger problem is the panel that will pick which reserve fighter will be pulled in if there is a need. It looks to me like they are having a separate 8 man tournament on the side with at least 4 reserve fights. So putting your finger on the scale and saying the person brought in should be from fight ‘A’ is a bit sketchy. Again I would like to see alternatives that would be better.
I would like to see all of this stuff get reviewed after the tournament and before the next one. But if Coker had tried to hold off for 6 month we all know there probably wouldn’t be a tournament.
by fitefan on Jan 14, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The unforgivable mistake is lying
LOL really? Tomas Rios, we’re dealing with fight promoters. You know as well as I do this comes with the territory. Further, your overbearing finger wagging falls a little short of proving the case he is outright lying ;
Scott Coker :
“We didn’t feel it was fair for one person to fight five rounds, another person to fight three rounds. There was debate about, well, should the final fight be a title fight? But what if Alistair wasn’t there? It just became very confusing.
Thus the commission was not the only stated reason. If anything he was putting a bit of spin on it. Spin =/= lying. You understand this. Further we don’t know all the places the events will be held or the markets they are looking at. You and Gross have mentioned 4 commissions, not 44. This leaves a net of 40 commissions.
Clearly, the fighters and their managers were the ones to object to this. What is Strikeforce supposed to say? Had they been completely frank about the backdoor conversations the narrative in these types of hit pieces would be “the inmates are running the asylum, M-1’s gonna screw this up, the sky is falling” no doubt.
Further complicating the issues at hand is the fact that this was not a move Strikeforce was forced into.
Overeem’s title will not be on the line in the tournament, but the winner is guaranteed a shot against Overeem for the title. Which means that if Overeem wins the tournament he has no opponent lined up and should he be eliminated prior to the final he will hold a meaningless belt that must be defended. The first scenario was possible regardless, but the second one opens the door to Strikeforce being stuck with a paper champion that would fracture the division’s narrative and hierarchy.
Ten thousand facepalms, here in another post I made I answer this criticism ;
While a lot of fans initial reaction to this will be negative, as was mine, this actually makes business sense in the long run. There is a lot of flack saying this tournament makes no sense now. This is unfounded. It puts the tournament in line with UFC, K1 and Pride tradition where there was a tournament title and a GP belt that is independent and separate. It also makes the tournament more fair and uniform, as five round fights take longer to prepare and recover from possibly.
It still gives is the fights people want to see, the lineal title can still change hands(save it), and it creates essentially another tournament final after the final. I really doubt anyone who would have turned into see the tournament now won’t because of this(though negative press from may cause a small dip, any issue along that is more than justified by a second major fight after the final being created, creating an overall net gain in eyes on Strikeforce even with the worst case scenario PR damage this move causes)
Those who watched MMA before the TUF recent era or those who have taken the time to learn the sport remember that the then-number 1 promotion Pride had a situation like this develop when Ricardo Arona defeated Wanderlei Silva during the tournament, setting up a rematch which Wanderlei delectably won. It creates storylines, controversy and intrigue with things like this.
In short, this extends the tournament another bout, and creates another headliner for a major card in the fall. If PPV is a goal, the more big fights they can create with this the better. The way they’re doing this is perfectly in sync with the sport this is a part of. I realize Gross started this fire and you’re just running with the torch, but this just comes across as a hit piece, which makes your bit about the brutal irony of the Strikeforce media problem all the more brutal and ironic.
Wolfgangsta @ www.ninjasplace.com
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 3:20 AM EST reply actions 2 recs
also
Announcing the tournament six weeks’ prior to its start was a move forced by the protracted negotiations between Strikeforce and Emelianenko’s notoriously hard-line management team. Fine, the deal got done and it was announced in conjunction with the Grand Prix which made for a slick media double-dip.
We all know that in the climate Strikeforce operates in, things must unfold quickly to avoid UFC counter measures. Even if this had been done weeks ago they still would likely have waited to pull the trigger as long as they could have.
Strikeforce lied about why they can’t deliver five round fights and are instituting unprecedented regulations for this tournament that will almost inevitably cast its legitimacy in doubt.
While buried in this thing may have been a valid criticism for Strikeforce, a promotion doing a major tournament on this scale for the first time ever in their history or the Unified Rules history(so they should be perfect about this, right?), having to change the format slightly, you eclipse it with complete untruths and exaggerated hyperbole. What is so shockingly unprecedented?
I am sorry but this whole thing reads like a complete hit piece and I can’t for a minute take any of it seriously. 0/5000 stars.
*in my prior post, Wanderlei’s win should have been debatable not delectable.
Wolfgangsta @ www.ninjasplace.com
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 3:39 AM EST up reply actions
A few things...
First, you’re either willfully misrepresenting my points or simply misunderstanding them. The notion that I set out to write a hit piece is laughable considering I went to great lengths to qualify my criticisms and pointed out the lopsided nature of criticism from the media when it comes to the UFC and Strikeforce.
How can you expect someone to take you seriously when you run around in comments sections claiming to have “immolated” someone? Debates aren’t resolved by making a series of points, regardless of their validity, and then declaring yourself the victor.
With that said, I’ll gladly respond to your points…
-I fail to see how Coker didn’t trap himself in an obvious lie. He maintains that the commissions got in the way of a five round format, but Nick Lembo, directer of the NJ commission, says he was never approached about it. NJ is playing host to the first round of the tournament so it only makes sense that if Strikeforce was ever serious about the idea they would have approached Lembo and Co. first. Strikeforce doesn’t need the approval of every commission, they need the approval of whatever commissions regulate the tournament. Also, Jon Luther of MMAFA.com personally reached out to six more commissions all of which said they would have no objection to the five round format.
-The point you raise about Strikeforce’s internal debate over the round format isn’t a point at all. Strikeforce could have pursued an across the board five round format and they didn’t even though they said that was their goal.
-You may dismiss this as spin on Coker’s part, but he lied. You seem to be conscientiously steering the facts in a direction that favor Strikeforce, but the facts themselves stand on their own. Further, I find it odd that you find the whole idea of pointing out lies an exercise in moralizing. We are all consumers and Strikeforce is attempting to court our dollars. Viewed within the context of that model, lying to potential consumers and delivering an inferior product than what was advertised is reckless and inexplicable.
-You say that the fighters and managers objected, but you have no credible evidence to support your stance. You’re basically making something up and treating it as fact. The more realistic scenario is that Showtime objected to a five round format, but again that is conjecture. Not fact.
-By not having the belt on the line, Strikeforce could end up with a paper champion. A unification match would have no promotional juice because anyone following along would know that the “champion” is coming off a loss. Worse yet is the possibility that Overeem loses prior to the final and ends up defending his title against someone other than the person who beat him. There are many different ways this tournament can fracture the division and it has little to do with the idea of a tournament, but rather the way it has been formatted.
-As someone else already pointed out, Strikeforce always announces their events on a short schedule. Primarily because they don’t have the advertising budget to effectively promote an event for months on end. You should really consider the facts of Strikeforce as a business before formulating opinions on why they run their business the way they do.
-You do realize Bellator puts on several tournaments at once on an even tighter schedule, right? Strikeforce isn’t doing anything unprecedented. Bellator ran a heavyweight tournament last season with the same structure. The regulations Strikeforce is instituting are what’s unprecedented and they will raise serious ethical concerns should they have to be employed.
This is all you’re going to get out of me, by the way. Passing off half-baked ideas as fact is not a good look for you.
www.SnarkFights.com
www.Twitter.com/Tomas_Rios
Me write lots.
by Tomas Rios on Jan 14, 2011 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 10 recs
Unrelated
Tomas you should update your signature to have your new Twitter account ;)
@TylerTreese on twitter
www.thatmmablog.blogspot.com/
by TylerTreese on Jan 14, 2011 10:54 AM EST up reply actions
Under normal circumstances, words themselves prescribe the ways in which we use them.
This is commonly called, “proper usage.” Apparently you disagree, Mr. Rios.
by Disco-Platypus on Jan 14, 2011 4:48 PM EST up reply actions
-You do realize Bellator puts on several tournaments at once on an even tighter schedule, right?
I’m sure it takes a hell of an advertising budget to pull in 300 people for a show. And Bellator sells the site not the gate so the promotion is done by who ever paid the fat fee to bring Bellator in. I am sure that booking a bar is cheaper than booking a 20,000 seat arena.
I'm not out to get you, but this is a hack piece.
You’re joking. I said I immolated these arguments, not you. Misrepresenting and misunderstanding? What was that again?
Six commissions now? Still leaves a net of 38 unaccounted for. Promoters lie constantly, it’s just the way it is(you get this, you do, I know you do) and Coker flat out said there was internal debate and they didn’t feel it was fair to have some fights five rounds and some not and that that was part of their decision. So how could he be flat out lying if he said they didn’t like the idea anyway? He was just tossing a bit of spin on this and you holding it against them to this degree is very suspicious and dubious. Your assumption that this damages legitimacy as a flat out lie is as disingenuous as it is woefully inaccurate. Further, Bellator’s tournaments don’t approach this is scale or magnitude and nor were they under the all bouts-five-rounds format. Advertising budget or not, Strikeforce can ill afford to allow the UFC time to out flank them. You get that as well. You’ve responded to little of the criticisms I presented and still haven’t defended the ridiculously bias language in the piece.
The reason I assume this is a bias piece is because there are a lot of damning criticisms against Strikeforce that don’t make sense and you should know better than to levy in the first place. There is no narrative to be fractured as the entire story arch will still come to a close by the end of the tournament and the title fight that follows. All this does is create intrigue and extend the tournament’s life another main event if needed. What damage can this do?
Strikeforce lied about why they can’t deliver five round fights and are instituting unprecedented regulations for this tournament that will almost inevitably cast its legitimacy in doubt.
What is unprecedented?
No one is out to get you Tomas Rios. While admittedly I never felt you were a good writer at your time at sherdog, I came into this piece with an open mind but up snapped it shut with these ridiculous claims.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
Beer why you gotta bust my balls dude
1. It could lead to LowT.
2. I need five minutes to recover.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 3:20 PM EST up reply actions
I'd love to see a "Promoter Lies of the Month" series.
Mark Pavelich bringing back Drew Ficket, Dana saying the “not talked to Brock in months” line was a lie to the media, and this thing you’re chronicling about Coker already this month. Would be a fun feature that fits well into your niche of snark blogging.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Shouldn’t that ruin the legitimacy of this TUF season? Give me a break!
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 5:38 PM EST up reply actions
If you ever find yourself with a shit ton of free time you should comment here more often.
Contributor at cagepages.com Come check us out.
Head Kick Legend
One thing I forgot...
I make it pretty damn clear that the Grand Prix as a concept is a killer business move. Strikeforce is making a play for greater prominence while the UFC is struggling for a major fight to capture everyone’s attention. Such a stance is not indicative of “hit piece”.
www.SnarkFights.com
www.Twitter.com/Tomas_Rios
Me write lots.
Spoon full of sugar
helps the poison go down.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
We all know that in the climate Strikeforce operates in, things must unfold quickly to avoid UFC counter measures.
Huh?
The UFC has never actively countered anything that Strikeforce has done. The worst they have ever done is their SOP of running an old pay-per-view in the same timeslot on Spike, and Strikeforce playing hide-and-seek isn’t going to change that. Spike can whip out an old PPV and air it at a moments notice. It requires zero lead time.
The notion that Strikeforce waits until the last minute in order to foil Zuffa’s nefarious plans is poppycock. They do it because that is how they operate. They operated this way long before they were in Zuffa’s crosshairs. It’s just how they run things. Always has been.
by Steve4192 on Jan 14, 2011 9:33 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
is this tournament business as usual?
within days of the tournament announcement they pony up enough cash to get Lesnar to do TUF. Case closed.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 2:06 PM EST up reply actions
How does Lesnar on TUF have anything to do with the tournament?
The tournament will be over long before the Lesnar-J2S season of TUF even airs.
The tournament won't be over
ends it Sept.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 2:21 PM EST up reply actions
now you're making points I'd make
they’re not valid competition
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 3:21 PM EST up reply actions
But anyway
The UFC has never actively countered anything that Strikeforce has done.
Strikeforce has never done PPV. However they’ve let it be known that they plan on getting involved with PPV this year. Which would change the game entirely and give the UFC reason to counter the early events to suck the momentum away from going to PPV.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
by countering
they are actively admitting that there is a threat, which they cannot admit.
by suavemilagro on Jan 14, 2011 7:23 PM EST up reply actions
Tell affliction that
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 7:26 PM EST up reply actions
well, you shouldn't poke the bear
that affliction shit was personal… “those crazy t-shirt guys” i kind of miss those crazy interviews they used to do…
by suavemilagro on Jan 14, 2011 7:30 PM EST up reply actions
No way does SF go to PPV without UFC counter-measures
This tournament is a staging format for such. This isn’t business as usual.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 7:57 PM EST up reply actions
I llke your efforts in this thread, but:
as I said to you in another one, you are overstating the importance of a single event which, most importantly, has not occurred yet. This is not to intimate you are wrong per se, or I think SF is incapable of challenging the UFC, but that we need to exercise more tempered judgment.
If you recall, the signings of both Fee-eye-ee-eye-aye-dor (said to the tune of Old McDonald) and Henderson were both regarded as portents of Strikeforce’s ability to compete in some modest sense of the word. Now, while those relationships have not been decidedly negative, it is difficult to reconcile the initial sense of optimism they brought with the eventual results. Such is the case here, I think.
by Disco-Platypus on Jan 14, 2011 9:27 PM EST up reply actions
as I said to you in another one, you are overstating the importance of a single event which, most importantly, has not occurred yet.
Now, while those relationships have not been decidedly negative, it is difficult to reconcile the initial sense of optimism they brought with the eventual results. Such is the case here, I think.
With the event not having occurred yet, how can we truly judge the results-per-optimism return ratio?
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 14, 2011 9:39 PM EST up reply actions
We excercise absention, which is precisely what I am suggesting to you.
By stating “Such is the case here, I think,” I am referring to your stance on the positive outcomes of this tournament despite it not occurring at all.
Again, not stating that it either will or will not result in positive attention for
SF, merely that you are overstating the importance of a not-as-of-yet completed event.
by Disco-Platypus on Jan 15, 2011 12:06 PM EST up reply actions
My comments in this thread spoke not to that..
but simply and directly to their stated plans to use this tournament to break into PPV.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 15, 2011 5:51 PM EST up reply actions
I llke your efforts in this thread, but: as I said to you in another one, you are overstating the importance of a single event which, most importantly, has not occurred yet.
:)
by Disco-Platypus on Jan 15, 2011 9:24 PM EST up reply actions
:|
Why would you reply about a quasi-related issue in this thread. Confusion was bound to happen. Strange man.
Normally I like strange but…
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 15, 2011 10:02 PM EST up reply actions
Tomas
In an effort for transparency, let me first say I am not a fan of yours. I was a vocal critic of stuff you did… well, pretty much everywhere. The latest debacle, I was securely in favor of Joe Rogan and had finally just written you off for good.
That said, this is good shit and your site is fantastic.
Why I never joined a frat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-KNVrZaN8M
"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse
"A samurai would bite your cock off if you tried that shit on the battlefield." - Kid Nate
This is as bad as anything he's done
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 15, 2011 1:14 AM EST up reply actions
gimme back m dragon
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 15, 2011 5:52 PM EST up reply actions
Shh. You keep talking over the adults.
You need to respect the baby... 'cause life is precious... and God... and the Bible.
by timetraveltome on Jan 15, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
I’ve never seen you say anything but unsolicited attacks on me. Lurker to hater. I like it.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
by Urijah Bieber on Jan 15, 2011 6:13 PM EST up reply actions
You said ;
First, you’re either willfully misrepresenting my points or simply misunderstanding them.
In my response I said ;
Tomas Rios takes the criticism a notch further in his new blog. The dissection and immolation of his arguments can be seen in the comments here.
But you said ;
How can you expect someone to take you seriously when you run around in comments sections claiming to have "immolated" someone?
I said your arguments were destroyed, which I hold to. But here you go, spinning the details. Maybe I should write an entire piece where I first examine how the blogsphere and mma fans have unfairly written you off and then lead into a bit where I accuse you of lying to the point it destroys your legitimacy and credibility as if no one in this business as ever lied or spun anything before.
Contributor at Unintelligent Defense
Lead Blogger at Ninja's Place
"...just when you think you’ve produced your magnum opus, someone shows up and takes a giant shit in your mouth. In your mouth." - Anthony Pace
Don't eat B.L.T. sammaches
I’m just glad that something as simple as Coker and Showtime getting caught in lies was all it took for the people that comment and post on message boards to stop giving a shit about promoters lying.
Is that what this whole thing was all about?
I’ve always been a fan of focused indifference. ;)
by Cannon Jacques on Jan 15, 2011 6:27 PM EST up reply actions

by 













