Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

The real reason pro wrestling fans have a problem with Luke

(writer's note: I was a huge pro wrestling fan up until 2003. Then interest waned until now where I am a very casual viewer)

I really am not going to waste a bunch of time and energy into writing out paragraphs of talking points because this is really simple. We don't care what Luke thinks about pro wrestling. He's entitled to his viewpoints. It is, however, the criticism of fans of pro wrestling that have people angered with him.

..how utterly simplistic, idiotic, fanboyishly reflexive, slovenly, intellectually lazy, inappropriate and otherwise annoying to no end how pro wrestling fans try to distill MMA into pro wrestling terms and concepts to help them understand the sport. Jordan and I take a gigantic dump on the moronic p.w. constructs, so I'm sure some of you are going to further hate my guts, but that's what you get for having the entertainment palate of a toddler.

retards doing bad acting for out of shape retards.

Comments like these (I don't feel like searching as I'm trying to write this in 15 minutes) that talk shit about fans and reduce them to the lowest common denominator. And it's funny because when other sport fans talk about how gay MMA fans are for watching grown men lay between each other's legs, everyone gets upset. That's ALL people have a problem with.

And to think, this all stemmed from people saying that Chael used pro wrestling tactics to build a fight (which he did).

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

Comment 144 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

But... but...

Luke keeps talking about how amazing pro wrestling is on twitter! HOW COULD HE SAY THESE THINGS. I AM SO TOOOOORN

So much cock. A cock guy.
Read my stuff at SMG.

by inadvertentgroinstrike on Sep 7, 2010 10:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah

Even MMA fans are ashamed of stereotypical MMA fans. There’s definitely no reason to be so dramatic about the parallels, even if he does have some legitimate criticisms.

"I'm gonna go after number one, whoever it is. If it's Anderson, or I gotta go up after the guys at 205, or go on a diet and go after Jose Aldo-- it doesn't matter." -Chael Sonnen

by Blackout612 on Sep 7, 2010 10:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Speak for yourself

The guy at my gym wearing a Tapout sleeveless shirt, screaming with each rep, and shadowboxing in between sets is awesome. I love fans like that.

BOOSH

by Farthammer on Sep 7, 2010 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have a guy like that at my work

he shadow boxes fire extinguishers and throws NIIIIICE leg kicks at empty rubbermaid trash cans as he saunters throughout the building.

"He sucks weiner! He sucks weiner!" - II SMASH II

by Earl Montclair on Sep 7, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Quality.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 8, 2010 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I look at it like this, pro wrestling is the annoying little brother, MMA is the middle brother with a chip on their shoulder, and boxing is the big brother. Wrestling bothers the hell out of us, but we bother the big brother.

My avatar has Bas Rutten and Terry Funk in it...therefore it's the manliest avatar on SB Nation.

by RobertGBP on Sep 7, 2010 10:50 PM EDT reply actions  

What…what is wrong with you?

Josh Barnett is a thrice proven juicer with a pro wrestling mindset and a personality that would lead you to believe he's never had a romantic encounter that didn’t start with "you gotta pay me upfront."

by Fake Emcee on Sep 8, 2010 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I should specify

I’m not being serious.

Josh Barnett is a thrice proven juicer with a pro wrestling mindset and a personality that would lead you to believe he's never had a romantic encounter that didn’t start with "you gotta pay me upfront."

by Fake Emcee on Sep 8, 2010 2:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

You know, in the end, it’s Luke. He has legit issues with it, and his points are well made, but he is not afraid to let the world know how he feels about something, especially when it bugs him. It’s not a great excuse for bashing the hell out of people, but I’ve seen Luke own up to his stuff in the midst of a comment section before, and considering the quiet stance he’s taken in regards some of the generalizations he’s made about Pro Wrestling fans.

In the end, Luke is just a dude, like I’m just a dude. And sometimes I get a little physical with my ho’s when they’re not working their corner on holidays…pimp hand strong, wallet fat, mma on TV…just another day in the books.

Twitter me @kkelchner621
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by Kaleb Kelchner on Sep 7, 2010 11:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Yep, I said in the end twice while beginning a thought. Don’t make me go on a tirade about how fans of Pro Wrestling for a distraction.

Twitter me @kkelchner621
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by Kaleb Kelchner on Sep 7, 2010 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just wrote this because in the latest thread

people seemed to think the reason why people were in arms was because he was dissing wrestling.

No, not at all.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 7, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd that shit homeboy

You should’ve added the quote about him getting away from pro wrestling when he discovered “girl’s titties” cause honestly, after that I was just like damn is this Luke gets raw day?

Josh Barnett is a thrice proven juicer with a pro wrestling mindset and a personality that would lead you to believe he's never had a romantic encounter that didn’t start with "you gotta pay me upfront."

by Fake Emcee on Sep 8, 2010 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, I was coming here to hate on this still being a topic of discussion

But this right here is a winner.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 8, 2010 2:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

"retards doing bad acting for out of shape retards."

that actually pisses me off and i’m not even a wrestling fan. really no reason to call people retards… as a person who works with the mentally challenged it just shows his ignorance.

by TylerTreese on Sep 7, 2010 11:23 PM EDT reply actions  

i still like Luke

probably just a bad word choice on his part. I know he’s not trying to offend.

by TylerTreese on Sep 7, 2010 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty

sure he was completely trying to offend. When asked if he was going to retract his statements or apologize he pretty much said fuck no and that he’ll never apologize.

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 7, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I haven't listened to the interview

but if he was than he can screw off for using words like that. I lost a lot of respect for him.

by TylerTreese on Sep 7, 2010 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

He didn't say it in the interview

he posted this stuff in some thread awhile back, I don’t remember exactly what it was but believe me those are all exact quotes from him.

Josh Barnett is a thrice proven juicer with a pro wrestling mindset and a personality that would lead you to believe he's never had a romantic encounter that didn’t start with "you gotta pay me upfront."

by Fake Emcee on Sep 8, 2010 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

retards doing bad acting for out of shape retards

This pretty much sums up my thoughts on pro wrestling, as well.

Chael Sonnen: Last time I defeated the myth, this time I'll defeat the man.
So...hyped...

by frosnt1 on Sep 8, 2010 12:07 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

And you call yourself a Chael Sonnen fan. That’s so fucking hilarious.

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 8, 2010 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is what started this whole drawn out debate. Please stop. Please please please. I just want this conversation to stop. I

"He sucks weiner! He sucks weiner!" - II SMASH II

by Earl Montclair on Sep 8, 2010 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

You do realize that you don't have to click into this post, right?

Or read the comments, right?

Right?

One more. Right?

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 8, 2010 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, I get what you're saying.

I’m just telling you that if you don’t want to talk about it or read it then why did you even click into this fanpost?

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 8, 2010 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Sorry guys. I have been humbled. In a handicap match. Just like DX was against the Spirit Squad. Full Circle!!!

"He sucks weiner! He sucks weiner!" - II SMASH II

by Earl Montclair on Sep 8, 2010 3:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

IIRC DX beat the spirit squad (I wasn't watching then)

But I know HHH ain’t losing to any cheerleaders

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 6:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

HHH probably let them win on RAW but he def. got his win back on the PPV in a glorious one sided squash!

"He sucks weiner! He sucks weiner!" - II SMASH II

by Earl Montclair on Sep 9, 2010 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

HHH would do it the other way

Lose on PPV in front of 200K, win on RAW in front of 4 million

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 9, 2010 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haha PC Load Letter horse

we each must become like fishermen, and go out on to the dark ocean of mind, and let your nets down into that sea

by Barack Lesnar on Sep 8, 2010 4:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I just like his fighting style.

Chael Sonnen: Last time I defeated the myth, this time I'll defeat the man.
So...hyped...

by frosnt1 on Sep 8, 2010 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it's definitely a rare game he has.

You don’t see such uncanny ability to be caught in submissions very often.

by Brent Ducharme on Sep 9, 2010 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know a lot of people have beef with S.C.

but I honestly never noticed an over abundance of pro wrestling talk before, just his usual M.O. of obsessing over everything Brock Lesnar accomplishes.

Josh Barnett is a thrice proven juicer with a pro wrestling mindset and a personality that would lead you to believe he's never had a romantic encounter that didn’t start with "you gotta pay me upfront."

by Fake Emcee on Sep 8, 2010 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, he was saying that PRIDE was pro wrestling. There was no “basically”. Steroids, predetermined conclusions and theatrical entrances – what more do you want?

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 8, 2010 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Shhhh

They didn’t create storylines or make matchups to build on rivalries. BTT vs Chute Boxe was a big storyline for PRIDE

If PRIDE could’ve worked more matches, they would’ve. No one knows how many were worked or how many Japanese fighters they paid to take a dive. And you’ll never know. I do know they sent in undersized and undertrained Japanese fighters to get crushed by roided up Brazilians in pro wrestling like squash matches.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 2:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess the Redskins/Cowboys is pro wrestling? Big feud, good for the NFL. What about Yankees/Red Sox? Was Clemens signing to the Yankees a heel turn?

by VirtualBalboa on Sep 8, 2010 8:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

That is the dumbest reach of the whole thread there

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I usually leave the forums alone especially when they are talking about me. But after doing an interview and answering a question a little too vaguely, it has spawned a misrepresentation. So, that being the case I felt that I should set the record straight.

I am not claiming that any of MY fights were fixed or "worked". I fought many hard matches in Pride with full intention of winning. I was stopped twice and the rest were split decisions against me in my losses in Pride (and, of course I disagree with the decisions, but I knew that I should have KOed them anyway). I am stating that I was approached once and only one time about my match with Satake.

I was approached by 2 Japanese guys who were always at the Pride events and were accompanying various Japanese fighters. They wanted to discuss my upcoming bout with Satake. They insisted that I keep it a stand up fight to be a more exciting match for the fans (or maybe because he has no ground game at all.) I told them that I was going to fight like I always do and I do my best to make it as exciting as possible, but I was not going to promise them anything. They came back to me that they were willing to compensate me (that is Japanese term for money) to keep it on the feet. I said no. They then changed the subject and said that they could get me hooked up in Japanese Pro-Wrestling and make more money. I felt this was another attempt to get me to make it a kickboxing match, but then they were discussing the outcome of the match and how it was important for Satake to win because he lost his last match. I stopped them there and told them I knew what was going to be said next and I was not going to do it. (If he had to win then that meant that I had to lose) End of Conversation.

My match was not very entertaining with Satake, but I knew that they wanted him to win and I needed to make sure I won very handedly or I would get screwed. It is not like it had not happened to me already with Sakuraba. They didn’t like the out come of that fight and changed the agreement/contract right on the spot. Satake was cheating so bad in that fight it was crazy. The ref even warned my corner that I was going to get a yellow card for yelling out every time he held onto the ropes with either his hand or hooked his foot (I could not make something up this bad).

I never was Pride’s favorite son, but it got worse after that fight. I really feel there were only 2 reasons for them keeping me; 1. I was popular in Japan because of being the KOP and 2. Because my agent, Michael Braverman, was doing important business for them and was instrumental in getting Pride over to the USA.

Some people are asking for proof. Do you think these conversations are recorded or video made of these? Give me a break. What you have to say about this is… Do you believe it or not? And what are my motivations? It is not like I am an embittered guy or need a job or that I am going to write a scandalous book about it. I can not honestly say if these guys were talking on the behalf of Pride or for Satake only. I can only relate what happened.

I have never really complained about my experience with Pride. Pride has produced some great shows and champions, but there have been some questionable decisions and fights. I did feel like I was getting the shaft on the decisions and even getting head butted by Silva, but I never made a big deal about it. I always fought my hardest against the best and never backed down from an opponent. I like to think I have the respect of the fans and my fighting peers.

This is long winded but wanted to set the record straight. Peace – Guy Mezger

http://www.mmanews.com/forums/general-mma-forum/26393-guy-mezger-clarifies-previous-statement-about-fixed-fights-pride.html

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, and Rampage also said they wanted to pay him money to lose to Saku… I don’t quite believe Rampage, and I don’t quite believe Mezger. This is besides the point though, first, I don’t like pro wrestling, I have never watched pro wrestling, there isn’t a channel here in Brazil that shows pro wrestling to my knowledge. I tried watching a few youtube clips and thought it was shit, so you can’t say Pride fans like pro wrestling without having a basis to say it.

Second is the following:

I do know they sent in undersized and undertrained Japanese fighters to get crushed by roided up Brazilians in pro wrestling like squash matches.

sure, that was their intent? I’m not going to touch the ‘roid’ accusation, I’m tired of debating that, it’s ignorant to just mentions things without proof so I’ll let it go. But Japan is a very nationalist country, why would they want their fighters losing instead of winning? Why would Saku fight Wandy three times? They weren’t happy when Saku lost the first time and had hopes he would win in one of the rematches, but that never happened. If Pride were to be fixed, he would have won at least one of the rematches as it would have generated a lot of money for them. I know that Pride have had a few fixed matches in the beginning, I won’t deny it, but they did stop it and anyone saying otherwise have no basis since there is no proof.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Waaaait, you don't believe any of the numerous fighters who claim to have been approached for fixing fights?

I didn’t say PRIDE was completely fixed, please actually read what I said. I said a few fights were fixed. And there were many mismatches.

If you understood the Japanese pro wrestling, you would understand why Saku would fight Wand 3 times. The same reason they would put rookie pro wrestlers in matches with vets. Ask Fujita. MMA was where pro wrestlers went to prove their legit toughness.

You refuse to believe steroid use was very rampant in unregulated Japan and you refuse to believe that bribes, etc were prevalent in a company with strong strong Yakuza ties. I don’t know what to say.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Waaaait, you don’t believe any of the numerous fighters who claim to have been approached for fixing fights?

numerous? you mean Rampage? show me the list of these numerous claims will you?

I didn’t say PRIDE was completely fixed, please actually read what I said. I said a few fights were fixed. And there were many mismatches.

there are many mismatches in the UFC, is the UFC like pro wrestling?

If you understood the Japanese pro wrestling, you would understand why Saku would fight Wand 3 times. The same reason they would put rookie pro wrestlers in matches with vets. Ask Fujita. MMA was where pro wrestlers went to prove their legit toughness.

you’re right, I don’t understand Japanese pro wrestling, hopefully you’re not getting your info from wiki again though. Saku was no rookie btw…

You refuse to believe steroid use was very rampant in unregulated Japan and you refuse to believe that bribes, etc were prevalent in a company with strong strong Yakuza ties. I don’t know what to say.

I don’t know what to say either, I personally don’t like claiming things to which I have no evidence to back it up, but I know you do so good for you…

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

numerous? you mean Rampage? show me the list of these numerous claims will you?

There have been several fighters who claim to have been offered payment to lose to Japanese fighters. PRIDE also threw money at young untrained Japanese fighters to fight veterans.

there are many mismatches in the UFC, is the UFC like pro wrestling?

No there’s not. Most mismatches are at the lower levels of the card. You won’t see the 205 champion fighting some Shark Fights scrub. Wand fought Jap scrubs regularly.

you’re right, I don’t understand Japanese pro wrestling, hopefully you’re not getting your info from wiki again though. Saku was no rookie btw…

What info from Wiki? Sakuraba was a pro wrestling legend in Japan. I never said he was a rookie. I’m talking about other Japanese pro wres guys crossing over into MMA to prove themselves. I mean for fucks sake, you had Crocop fight a luchador WHILE he wore his mask.

I don’t know what to say either, I personally don’t like claiming things to which I have no evidence to back it up, but I know you do so good for you…

I…don’t know what to say. I hope you can breathe with your head in the sand.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

There have been several fighters who claim to have been offered payment to lose to Japanese fighters. PRIDE also threw money at young untrained Japanese fighters to fight veterans.

stop repeating yourself and show me

No there’s not. Most mismatches are at the lower levels of the card. You won’t see the 205 champion fighting some Shark Fights scrub. Wand fought Jap scrubs regularly.

yeah, all of Anderson’s opponents were very credible, and Chuck’s during his reign, and Hughes, you’re right, sure….

I mean for fucks sake, you had Crocop fight a luchador WHILE he wore his mask.

I don’t deny they had freakshows, I’d also call Toney vs Randy a freakshow, Tito Chuck III a freak show, Coleman Shogun a freak show, and Hughes v Gracie a freakshow. And I do enjoy a freak show every now and then, just not all the cards and every fight.

I…don’t know what to say. I hope you can breathe with your head in the sand.

that should be your stance, since you don’t seem to like evidence right? I’m pretty sure there isn’t enough oxygen underneath sand to breath, but hey, I’m sure I can find some wackos who can claim otherwise, your stance is just like those wackos bro.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, you're being obtuse on purpose or.....

You want proof? How many Japanese cans did their MW champ crush? They put in undertalented fighters to get squashed. That’s pro-wrestling 101. The UFC does it? Yes. Though nowhere near as often and not with the top fighters.

yeah, all of Anderson’s opponents were very credible, and Chuck’s during his reign, and Hughes, you’re right, sure….

Sigh.

I don’t deny they had freakshows, I’d also call Toney vs Randy a freakshow, Tito Chuck III a freak show, Coleman Shogun a freak show, and Hughes v Gracie a freakshow. And I do enjoy a freak show every now and then, just not all the cards and every fight.

Explain how Tito/Chuck is a “freakshow” or Coleman/Shogun when Shogun became the champ in a year and Coleman beat Stephan Bonnar at UFC 100. Hughes/Gracie was not really a freakshow as Gracie is an actual champion and not a luchador wearing a frickin mask in the cage.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

The UFC does it? Yes. Though nowhere near as often and not with the top fighters.

I don’t think they do it as often either, I just said that they do do it, and you acknowledge it. Don’t twist things.

Explain how Tito/Chuck is a "freakshow" or Coleman/Shogun when Shogun became the champ in a year and Coleman beat Stephan Bonnar at UFC 100. Hughes/Gracie was not really a freakshow as Gracie is an actual champion and not a luchador wearing a frickin mask in the cage.

matter of opinion, freak shows to me are huge mismatches, which those were (and I said Tito Chuck III, but I meant II, freaking keyboard!).

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sooooo?

What’s your point about the UFC freakshows then? That they should be called similar to pro wrestling because they put on a freakshow once every blue moon while PRIDE did one a show?

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

no

my point is that neither should, you sure like to assume things bro, this is very tiring. Make your point, and don’t presume I’m making a point that isn’t my stance, this is what is called a strawman argument, and you do that a lot… it’s very tiring dealing with that, and quite frankly the only thing I want from you right now is your answer to the allegation that numerous fighters say they were offered money to fix fights. provide proof or GTFO.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

You've already been presented with three

You also agreed earlier in the thread that they might have fixed fights. You did that with no “proof”, why change now?

Do I have more pro fighter statements that I can find at this moment? no. But it’s well known that PRIDE worked some fights. It’s well known that the Yakuza ran PRIDE and it’s known they gambled heavy and approached fighters to take dives.

How you can’t see this, I don’t know.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

amazing, so I guess your numerous is a total of three? Okay then… and I already acknowledged that there were fights that were fixed, not that they might have been, but that they were. and I already provided a video demonstrating this, that’s proof enough… we’re done man.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I already acknowledged that there were fights that were fixed, not that they might have been, but that they were.

That’s what I’ve been saying all along. PRIDE was not above fixing/working fights.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

it hasn't been demonstrated however

that fights outside of Takada, were fixed. that’s my main argument. You can’t just say that because of Takada we won’t know what other fights might have been fixed. using this rationale, I could make an argument that because Coleman took a dive, then we cannot know for sure what other fights he may have taken a dive. Takada became very involved with Pride after he retired from fighting, certainly you can make a case to why they wouldn’t want him taking a beating. You can also tell that the Takada fights were fixed by the way they were fighting, the same can’t be said to other fights from Pride.
 
And three fighters stating they were offered money to take a dive is not enough IMHO, I need more.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

There were other pretty blatantly worked fights at the start of Pride beside’s Takada’s but the three fighters comments are what got me wondering if there were more later. Of course any later worked/influenced fights would most likely be yakuza related.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not aware of them, which ones are they? Also, this is still in the beginning of Pride, and if it can be seen by the way they fight, then we can also conclude that the latter years did not include fight fixing because of the way they fight.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Defending PRIDE’s match-making as legitimate is bad for your Internet health, my friend.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 8, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

i'ma get internet osteoporosis

too much typing :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I mean I don't understand what PRIDE people were watching

They had their legit stars (Fedor, Wand, etc) and protected them….like a pro wrestling organization.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

There was a “formal” list on the Sherdog forum of suspected ones years ago but I’m not sure if it is still around. Yea they were all early fights though (like Nathan Jones vs Koji Kitao from Pride 1). That’s a different issue from potential yakuza fight fixing that guys like Rampage was talking about, the early shows were full of pretty fishy happenings that point to Pride’s pro wrestling roots.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I remember that list, but I think the only fights there listed from Pride were Takada’s fights, I think the other fights in the list were from other promotions if I’m not mistaken.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Q. This fight is a work! I’ll quickly start a thread about it!

There’s a recent influx of newbs that seem to think most fights are works, which is fine provided there’s a feasible explanation. First of all the term “work” is often misused. A “worked” fight is one in which both fighters agree to work toward a predetermined finish. A “thrown” fight is one in which one of the fighters takes a dive or allows himself to be defeated – his opponent may or may not be aware of it. For example Oleg-Macias was not a work because Oleg was clearly not aware that Macias was going to take a dive.

Fights that are generally considered by consensus to be worked or thrown:

Oleg Taktarov vs. Anthony Macias (UFC VI) – According to Macias, Buddy Albin the local site promoter and manager of both fighters threatened that Macias’ career would be over unless he took a dive against Oleg. Oleg was unware of this. Macias went on to win titles in several Albin-promoted events. Buddy Albin was a total sleeze bag BTW.

Dan Severn vs. Mitsuhiro Matsunaga (U-Japan) – Severn denies that his fight against pro wrestler Matsunaga was worked, but watching the fight itself leaves little doubt and the general consensus is that this was a worked fight.

Kimo vs Kazushi Sakuraba (S-Cup) – This was billed as a legit NHB fight on a Shootboxing card, but it turns out it was not legit (another NHB fight on the card, M. Illioukhin vs Mestre Hulk was legit). The fight looks very real and Kimo lands a number of really solid shots and headbutts. There are several versions of what took place in this fight, but perhaps the closest thing to the truth is the version that has Sakuraba carrying Kimo for most of the fight before finally taking a dive without Kimo’s knowledge. That would explain Kimo throwing real shots and Sak playing defense the whole time and also the fact that Kimo vehemently (and convincingly) insists it was legit, yet Sakuraba has said on several occasions that his first shoot MMA fight was the Conan Silviera fight, not the Kimo fight.

Murakami Kazunari vs. John Dixon (Pride 1) – It was well-known in the fight community even before the first Pride took place that the Kazunari-Dixon and Kitao-Jones fights would be works. Pride’s initial intent was to showcase different types of fights in addition to NHB – full contact karate, kickboxing and also shoot-style works like RINGS and PWFG. Later Pride would be more secretive about its worked fights.

Koji Kitao vs Nathan Jones (Pride 1) – See above.

Nobuhiko Takada vs. Kyle Sturgeon (Pride 3) – All of Takadas “wins” were blatant works. This is pretty much common knowledge.

Nobuhiko Takada vs. Mark Coleman (Pride 5) – See above.

Nobuhiko Takada vs. Alexander Otsuka (Pride 7) – See above.


Fights that are suspected of being works but there is no consensus agreement:

Don Frye vs. Mark Hall 3 (Ultimate Ultimate 2) – Several months after the fact Hall claimed that in the locker room before the match Frye had offered him $50,000 to take a dive so he would be fresh when he fought Tank in the finals (Frye had had a grueling match with Goodridge in the opening round and was exhausted). Hall came out with his accusations because, he said, Frye never paid him. Frye vehemently denied it and said Hall was a disturbed individual. Hall was blacklisted by the fight community and never fought again. The jury is still out on this one.

Naoya Ogawa vs. Gary Goodridge (Pride 6) – Anytime a pro wrestler (other than Sak) gets a win in Pride people will claim it was a work. Gary denies this was a work but many people suspect it was. Hard to tell for sure.

Naoya Ogawa vs. Masaaki Sataki (Pride 11) – See above.

Vitor Belfort vs. Joe Charles (Ultimate Japan 1) – Vitor was sick and refused to fight unless he was able to pick his opponent. He chose Charles who was one of his training partners at the time. No strikes were thrown in what turned out to be a grappling match, with Vitor winning by armbar. Whether this was a worked fight or they simply had a gentleman’s agreement not to strike is open to question.

Mark Schultz vs. Leopoldo Montenegro (Jungle Fight 1) – Schultz claims this was work but everyone else involved denies it. There have been questions about some of Montenegro’s other fights in the Inoki run promotion as well.

Pancrase works: – The Pancrase organiztion admitted that there had been some worked fights early on, but did not say how many or which ones. Fights that most people agree were works are Shamrock-Hume, Shamrock-Suzuki 2, and Suzuki-Funaki. A number of others are suspected. Bas Rutten claims that he never participated in a work in Pancrase.

http://www.sherdog.net/forums/f2/sherdog-user-rules-faq-contact-info-all-new-members-read-17836/

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

nice find

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Amazing the things that stick in your head from years ago, venturing back onto the Sherdog forums to look for something isn’t much fun though :D

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

ha

I feel your pain. I didn’t remember this list until you mentioned it, the sherdog forums are certainly a hazard to our mental health hehe

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

try to seach “worked fight” on that forum, it will make your head hurt. I remember the last think I read there before I abandoned it for greener pastures, someone posted about how Kimbo’s beard gave him an unfair advantage against being knocked out :D

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

I’m lucky to have never been part of those forums, I only used to read the news there, I didn’t become part of a community until I found Mania, and then BE.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Still like their radio shows (how I found BE) but those forums are a wreck and seem to be getting worse.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually like sherdog

the news and most aspects of the site, I just don’t like their forums and community :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

dude

“Jap scrubs” ?

I’m struggling not to tell you to fuck off.

Satoshi Kon
R.I.P.

by Grappo on Sep 8, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

for real

that is fucking despicable.

by JimCrankshaft on Sep 9, 2010 2:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Boxing has fixed fights.

Boxing isn’t pro wrestling. Or maybe it is, I’m sure you’ll find a reason… Cassius Clay was cutting promo’s like Gorgeous George and put over Frazier until he made a face turn with his new persona of Muhammad Ali to become the most beloved american wrestler boxer of all time!

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Sep 8, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course boxing has fixed fights

I’m not saying that “fixed fights” is why PRIDE was “pro wrestling”, I don’t know how we got off on that tangent.

Oh, because I said that PRIDE would’ve worked more matches if they could’ve. YES. Absolutely.

But some fixed fights =/= pro wrestling and that’s not an argument I’m making.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I got off on the tangent, I was looking for the quote about Pride and japanese pro wrestling and ran across the Metzger statement.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know that Pride have had a few fixed matches in the beginning, I won’t deny it, but they did stop it and anyone saying otherwise have no basis since there is no proof.

There was no proof they ever fixed any fights but it is funny that you would believe that they were working things for a specific outcome at one time but not the other. Never discount the Japanese sports industry’s credibility issues(and in Japan sports and pro wrestling are fairly tightly connected in the public eye). Rampage and Guy aren’t the only ones who have those kinds of stories.

As far as you living in Brazil and not liking pro wrestling, you do know that there are lots of different kinds/styles of pro wrestling right? Pride was straight out of the Japanese pro wrestling book and they even admitted the connection. Yes Michaelson is painting with a broad brush but the similarities between Pride and Japanese pro wrestling were huge and it was that way for a reason, it’s what the Japanese viewing audience expected.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

There was no proof they ever fixed any fights but it is funny that you would believe that they were working things for a specific outcome at one time but not the other

no proof needed, just observation… and what are you talking about that I said they were working for an specific outcome? I said it’s most likely that they would have wanted wandy to lose, I’m sure Dana would also not want Fitch to become champion, doesn’t mean that he’d fix a fight in order for that to not become true.

Never discount the Japanese sports industry’s credibility issues(and in Japan sports and pro wrestling are fairly tightly connected in the public eye).

ok then, forget Dream and Sengoku, those are all pro wrestling as well…

Rampage and Guy aren’t the only ones who have those kinds of stories.

show me the other list of fighters who say fights were fixed in Pride.

As far as you living in Brazil and not liking pro wrestling, you do know that there are lots of different kinds/styles of pro wrestling right?

correct

Pride was straight out of the Japanese pro wrestling book and they even admitted the connection.

show me where they admitted this

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

no proof needed, just observation… and what are you talking about that I said they were working for an specific outcome? I said it’s most likely that they would have wanted wandy to lose, I’m sure Dana would also not want Fitch to become champion, doesn’t mean that he’d fix a fight in order for that to not become true.

Did Dana call Fitch at home and offer him money to lose?

ok then, forget Dream and Sengoku, those are all pro wrestling as well…
if you can’t tell the difference between being pro wrestling and being very similar to pro wrestling then I can’t help. The similarities and evolutions of MMA in Japan from Japanese pro wrestling are well documented. Heck DSE also ran pro wrestling shows, the people involved come from pro wrestling backgrounds.

show me the other list of fighters who say fights were fixed in Pride.

Already posted something else below.

show me where they admitted this

I have been looking for the quotes but it is hard for me to look at work and a lot of sites are blocked from my work computer.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did Dana call Fitch at home and offer him money to lose?

I still haven’t agreed that Pride did that, so your question is not constructed correctly.

if you can’t tell the difference between being pro wrestling and being very similar to pro wrestling then I can’t help. The similarities and evolutions of MMA in Japan from Japanese pro wrestling are well documented. Heck DSE also ran pro wrestling shows, the people involved come from pro wrestling backgrounds.

you had said the following before:

Never discount the Japanese sports industry’s credibility issues(and in Japan sports and pro wrestling are fairly tightly connected in the public eye).

I don’t see anything wrong with my answer…

Already posted something else below.

you posted nothing but speculations, and three people (Goodridge, Mezger and Page) is hardly numerous people (this is something Black Lesnar said, not you, so I don’t hold that against you).

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

you posted nothing but speculations, and three people (Goodridge, Mezger and Page) is hardly numerous people

How many people telling the same story do you need? I was looking for the quote on Pride and pro wrestling being similar when I ran across the Mezger and Goodridge quotes, I can go back and actually look to see if there are more fighters telling the same exact story about Pride.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

definitely more than three

listen, a lot of fighters fought under Pride, and three people isn’t enough to change my mind. First, Rampage isn’t the kind of guy I’d trust, the guy has said bad things regarding every promotion he has fought under (including the UFC). It’s not credible enough for me. Gary and Guy, I don’t know much about them personally, but again, to me it’s not enough to take what three people say at face value when you had so many fighters under one organization. The organization is long gone, there is nothing that would hold them back from bad mouthing the promotion, yet there is no army of fighters badmouthing Pride. If Pride was really doing all of these, you’d imagine there would be lots more stories like Gary’s, a lot more…

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

The same people who ran Pride are now involved with Dream, you also have to wonder if active fighters are leary of the subject(particularly if they did take the money). There is still plenty of reason for guys to not want to go on the record about something like that. Of course it’s drifted off the original topic but I am bored at work today so I may try and look around.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

you can definitely make that case as well

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Someone came in my office and dropped a bunch of work on my desk, how inconsiderate of them. Still I am intrigued by this so I may spend some time tonight looking around to see if anyone else has spoken out. This got me wondering myself at what beyond the Takada fights were questionable.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

hey man

anything you find I’ll check it out, if I’m wrong I’ll recognize it too, your work will not be wasted!

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

For me the big thing is learning myself, getting stuck on a topic and researching it adds to my knowledge. I started the day not knowing about the Metzger statement of that Gary Goodridge had spoken to Sherdog about this. I’m not as much worried about being right or wrong as much as getting to the bottom of something that interest me. If I find something else I will definately share it.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

no doubt

same here, although I can pretty lazy at times hehe :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

and what are you talking about that I said they were working for an specific outcome?
I know that Pride have had a few fixed matches in the beginning, I won’t deny it, but they did stop it and anyone saying otherwise have no basis since there is no proof.

Fixing a fight is working for a specific outcome. You admit that you believe they were fixing fights at one time even though there was no proof or even stories from guys who were involved but then even in the face of guys coming forward with stories about this happening later you deny it could of happened and said you don’t believe those guys.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

my bad

I thought you were talking about the wandy/saku thing. Yes, they did in fact fixed fights before (all from Tanaka to my knowledge, who became part of Pride after he retired). I do think there is no evidence that to support they fixed fights after that though.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who said Wand/Saku was fixed?

It wasn’t. But they knew Saku would get his ass beat and put on a good show and he would “get over” (there’s some pro wrestling for you) more with the Japanese crowd for fighting Wand.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

that was not the case with the first Wandy Saku fight

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

The first matchup with Saku/Silva

was a legit match up and Silva was being groomed for the title and Saku was on winning streak. Saku got crushed and the pretty much knew he wasn’t on the level of Silva but they put him right back in there for the title match because he was their biggest Japanese star. Then they fed him to Wand in the GP for an easy win. They were trying to set up Chuck vs Silva in the finals and was giving Silva the easy path while Chuck had to fight Reem and Page.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

these are all opinions

I don’t share the same as yours, I don’t think they were as much as feeding Saku but really did have hopes of him winning. But who cares? This doesn’t have anything to do with Pride being a pro-wrestling like debate.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

It does in the sense that they set things up for desireed outcomes

And I don’t mean “Dana White hoping that a fighter loses” desired outcome.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or they seeded it like a tournament

and the number one seed (champion) fought the bottom seed. Then he fought the next guy in his bracket, an undefeated judo gold medalist.

But no. It was obviously pro wrestling. Despite the fact that it wasn’t mock fighting or choreographed. And don’t give me that “work” bullshit either. Fight fixing in PRIDE was corruption. A work in pro wrestling is part of the product. It’s a terrible argument.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Sep 8, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, just no

Look at the matchups in that first round and tell me they “seeded it like a tournament”

Shogun vs Rampage in the first round?
Hendo vs Lil Nog in the first round?
Alistair vs Vitor in the first round?

Yet Sakuraba (who wasn’t ranked higher than any of those) got Yoon-Dong Sik?

And they NEVER released brackets. They always reshuffled the matchups to get fights they wanted.

Let’s go back to 2003.

Chuck gets Alistair, but Yoshida gets Tamura? Who do you think was higher ranked, Chuck or Yoshida? C’mon son.

And you, and others, are being LITERAL. Saying PRIDE was “pro wrestling” doesn’t mean that it was ACTUALLY pro wrestling with cheorgraphed fights and what not. It’s simply saying that there were several big ideas and influences taken from pro wrestling and put into PRIDE. Along with the fact that PRIDE wasn’t above paying fighters to lose, setting up works, making easy matches to get their favorite fighters easy wins. Don’t be literal.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're the one making absolute statements that

PRIDE is pro wrestling and that all PRIDE fans have to like pro wrestling or they are hypocrites. I’m not going to detail how you’ve radically changed your stance already, arguing this with you is a fools errand. Reading my sig and letting this die.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Sep 8, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m going to jump in on something here because I feel bad that I am the one who derailed the discussion by talking about fixed fights. How was Pride like Japanese Pro Wrestling? In every single way except for the fixed fights. It was promoted the same way, it was filmed the same way, it used the same style stage set ups and entry ramps and the same pagaentry and production values, the same style video promos and even the style of announcers that Japanese pro wrestling used. If you didn’t know what MMA was and had turned on a tv in Japan and saw a Pride event you would of thought it was Japanese pro wrestling, the one thing they were changing from pro wrestling was that it was supposed to be real fights. Heck a heck of a lot of the stars in Pride were pro wrestlers or crossed over into pro wrestling and back and forth, Pride’s parent company DSE also promoted pro wrestling. Heck the entire reason Pride existed is because Nobuhiko Takada defending the honor of pro wrestling against Rickson Gracie did such good ratings.

Don’t confuse puroresu with the WWE, pro wrestling in Japan is a different style(it has many different styles actually, and that is what Pride was built on. If you were watching Pride you were watching a different style of Japanese pro wrestling where the contest were real (or at least supposed to be) but pretty much everything else was the same. I appologize profusely for leading off on the fixed fight stuff, I got reading some interviews and got carried away but that has nothing to do with Pride being like Japanese pro wrestling.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shame I didn’t post that earlier, I think that difference between WWE and puroresu is really what throws a lot of people off. Inoki’s pro wrestling and McMahon’s pro wrestling are very different things.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Japanese pro wrestling (outside the ring)

is even MORE of a spectacle than US wrestling.

Have you seen some of the Great Muta vs Hakushi entrances? LOL. Took like 20 minutes they were so elaborate.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 9, 2010 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Much like the Pride entrances. Inside the ring a lot of them work that “strong style” there though.

I used to watch a lot of the hardcore “death matches” when I was in college, guys would get tapes of some crazy shit. Someone showing up with a case of beer and a tape with a Piranha Death Match or a fight in a ring full of cacti and barbed wire made for a good night :D

by who me on Sep 9, 2010 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here I will fall back on wikipedia because I do think that there is a heck of a lot of confusion when it comes to talking about Pride and pro wrestling. A lot of people just can’t separate WWE from their view of the pro wrestling industry as a whole. I think that it is telling that there are plently of hardcore pro wrestling fans who hate WWE style pro wrestling, it’s not the definition of what pro wrestling is it’s just Vince McMahon’s idea of what his company’s product should be like.

Despite some similarities to the much more popular style of professional wrestling in the United States, Japanese wrestling is known for many differences from the Western style. Puroresu is known for its “fighting spirit” and the wrestlers are known for their full contact strikes. A lot of the wrestlers in Japan have some degree of knowledge in many different martial arts and wrestling styles. Because of this, there are usually doctors and trainers at ringside for assisting the wrestlers after a match. Most matches have clean finishes and many of the promotions don’t use any angles or gimmicks. Japanese wrestling is also known for its relationship with fellow mixed martial arts promotions. Wrestling and martial arts icon Antonio Inoki usually organizes wrestling matches and MMA fights on the same card. Puroresu still remains popular and it draws huge crowds from the major promotions. With this and its relationship with other martial arts disciplines, the audiences and wrestlers treat puroresu as a combat sport.
The dominant styles of Japanese professional wrestling were set in place by the two dominant promotions in Japan. New Japan Pro Wrestling, headed by Antonio Inoki, used Inoki’s “strong style” approach of wrestling as a combat sport. Wrestlers incorporated kicks and strikes from martial arts disciplines, and a strong emphasis was placed on submission wrestling. Many of New Japan’s wrestlers including top stars such as Shinya Hashimoto, Riki Choshu, and Keiji Mutoh came from a legitimate martial arts background. All Japan Pro Wrestling, under the direction of Shohei Baba, used a style referred to as “King’s Road.” The “King’s Road” style was in large part derived from American wrestling, particularly the style of top wrestlers in the National Wrestling Alliance, such as Dory Funk Jr., Terry Funk, and Harley Race, all of whom wrestled for Baba in Japan. As such, “King’s Road” placed a heavy emphasis on working of holds, brawling, and the storytelling elements of professional wrestling.

Throughout the 1990s, three individual styles — shoot style, lucha libre, and hardcore — were the main divisions of independent promotions, but as a result of interpromoting, it is not unusual to see all three styles on the same card.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puroresu

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

how old are you Michaelson?

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ran across this and thought it was interesting.

According to the NSAC, the exact passage in Nastula’s contract with Pride in Japan is as follows: “Fighter agrees to be tested immediately preceding and following the fight in each event, to confirm negative results of the use of marijuana, cocaine, barbiturates, and other illegal substances. Should any test be positive, fighter shall forfeit all amounts payable under this agreement granted for such event. Performance-enhancing stimulants of the steroid-based family are specifically excluded from the scope of the tests and the prohibition in this section.”

http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=3153&zoneid=13

Apparantly the Pride contract (for Pawel Nastula at least) specifically stated that performance-enhancing steroids were specifically not tested for or prohibited. It’s one thing to not test but to actually put into a fighters contract that they were not prohibited should raise eyebrows, it certainly did with NSAC when they read that. On the other side of the coin it does point out that they were testing for pot use at least.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is my view regarding steroid accusations, not only in Pride but in general

and damn you for bringing this up! :p

It’s fair to say that some fighters do steroids, it’s not fair to say however that all fighters do steroids. If it’s not fair (IMO) to say all fighters do steroids, then I can’t single out nor condemn any one fighter speculating them of doing steroids unless there is evidence to support otherwise.

To explain it a bit better, let me try to put this in perspective. Josh Barnett has tested positive for steroids in the US, it’s fair to speculate that he did steroids back in Pride as well. I’m not however prepared to say that Fedor has done steroids, or Wandy, or Chuck, or anyone else that has entered the Pride ring. But this does not mean that they definitely didn’t do steroids, I’m just not going to go the extra step and say that they may have…

It’s definitely very interesting that Pride would have that language in their contracts though, this is new to me.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh without a doubt saying that just because they weren’t testing tells us nothing about whether any fighter was doing them or not, for that matter just because someplace is testing doesn’t mean they are catching everyone who does it. We have no clue about steroid use in Pride and we probably never will.

I had never seen this before even though it is fairly old but what stood out to me wasn’t that they weren’t testing (everyone knew that already) but that they actually put wording in their contracts that it wasn’t prohibited due to them not testing for it. That goes beyond them just not testing to them actually stating it’s ok to use them in their promotion. It tells me nothing about the fighters but quite a bit about the people behind the promotion.

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 8, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

How Japan’s biggest MMA show went from one mob scene to another

Mark Coleman, Pride’s first open weight Grand Prix champion, has fond memories of the Tokyo Hilton hotel: great food, beautiful architecture and an atmosphere that seemed to soothe the tensions in the days leading up to fights.

"Then the boss hung himself in a room there," he says, "and that was the end of that."

The apparent suicide of 42-year-old Pride chair Naoto Morishita on Jan. 9, 2003 — by official account, the result of turmoil with a mistress — signaled more than just the end of good times at the Hilton. It might have also been the day when the then-6-year-old fight promotion became permanently and irrevocably intertwined with the country’s pervasive organized crime sect known as the Yakuza.

"That’s believed to be the point in which Pride was taken over by organized crime," says Jake Adelstein, an American who spent over a decade covering vice crimes for Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper. "There’s a lot of speculation that he was killed and it was a staged suicide. And that’s when the Yakuza decided to move in."

Unlike the mafia of the United States, Yakuza aren’t content to run local numbers rackets or petty crimes: with a number of families spread across Japan, they have ties to a sizable stable of otherwise legitimate businesses. The scope of their interests has made them possibly the richest criminal organization on the planet.

"They’re the largest private equity group in the world," says Adelstein. "The Yakuza invest bankrolls in major companies — companies that have even later made IPOs like Live Door, which collapsed after insider trading scandals. A huge source of early funds was a consumer loan company connected to organized crime."

When Pride began in 1997 under the direction of production group KRS, it’s likely that Yakuza involvement was limited only to site tax — promoters would pay a "fee" to run events in crime family territory — and preferred seating for key players to impress girlfriends. But Yakuza also had ties to talent agencies, which means that some members may have taken special interest in the outcomes of certain bouts. In addition to some suspect performances by standout pro wrestler-turned-fighter Nobuhiko Takada, it was not unusual for foreign athletes to be approached by anonymous benefactors with proposals.

"I had a fight with [judo champion Naoya] Ogawa," says Gary Goodridge, a veteran of Japan’s fighting circuit. "They were calling my room, calling my home to give the fight to him: ‘Let him win, let him beat you, let him beat you.’ Then we got into money. ‘OK, how much money are you going to pay to let him beat me?’ Finally, it came down to the fact that there wasn’t enough money." Goodridge says he legitimately lost the fight, but recalls at least one other fighter admitting he was being paid to take a dive.


(The phone calls and harassment were typical Yakuza techniques. "If you threaten violence, there’s a chance they’ll go to the police," Adelstein says. "That makes for a huge scandal and people can go to jail. Offering him money is not a threat. It’s an offer.")

By the time Morishita was found dead in 2003, the Yakuza had expectations for Pride beyond premium seating and the occasional manipulation of fights. Pride’s open weight tournament in January and May 2000 might have been perceived as a loss leader for the brand, but in exchange for the immense expense, the promotion was gaining ground on K-1, the popular kickboxing program that continued to draw the most attention of any combat sport in Japan.

"Like anything, they invest money and they take their cut," says Adelstein. "When Pride became a real moneymaker, I think they decided to take over and see what kind of money they could make off of it."

"When you’re approached by Yakuza in Japan, it’s not like you’re being approached by a mafia figure in America," explains Enson Inoue, a Hawaiian-Japanese fighter who speaks freely about his connections with crime families. "It’s a whole different level. The Yakuza here can go from the hardcore syndicate type of guys to guys who are legitimate businessmen, scalping tickets or just extorting small businesses."

While it’s common knowledge that Yakuza have widespread ties to a large number of businesses in Japan, there is a blind-eye condition Adelstein describes as making all the difference. "There’s the public reputation or image, which has to be preserved, and then there’s the reality. While everyone was quite aware there was an organized crime connection, once that’s revealed, Japan’s sense of propriety demands you do something."

That revelation came late in 2005, when the Shukan Gendai newspaper printed an accusation by fight industry player Seiya Kawamata that Pride and the Yakuza were heavily invested in each other. That was followed by a story in which it was reported that Kawamata was an active member of the Yamaguchi-Gumi, a Yakuza sub-family.

Kawamata denied the charges and sued the journalist who made the allegations, but the damage was already done. Despite repeated denials by then-president Nobuyuki Sakakibara, the FujiTV network severed its deal with Pride in 2006. Without a television funnel to help fund their events and provide an audience, the promotion couldn’t survive.

On March 27, 2007, Pride’s parent company, Dream Stage Entertainment, announced that it had sold Pride and its assets to Zuffa, the Las Vegas-based fight promoter that had resurrected the lifeless Ultimate Fighting Championship brand beginning in 2001. While Zuffa owner Lorenzo Fertitta promised Pride would continue, there have been no events promoted under the brand to date. Fertitta would later sue the former Pride owners for fraud over a failure to cooperate with background checks and financial document-keeping; Dream Stage counter-sued, saying Fertitta broke the agreement to continue operating.

The lawsuit has yet to be settled, but one thing remains clear: the price of doing business in Japan might be more than anyone can afford.

http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/Pride-Before-the-Fall-25249

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Please point out to me these articles I've written

(not about Chael Sonnen) that link pro wrestling to MMA. Oh and besides today’s posts saying PRIDE was basically pro wrestling with no scripts.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 2:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Like I said, I don't go digging through your stuff to find this.

I’m not up on your dick like… was it amadeus? Whatever, I don’t care. So you can say “Ok, aside from that time you found from less than 12 hours ago, when else?!” but the fact of the matter is I don’t even have to try looking to find something. Paint it as an exception or whatever you want. It’s stupid and I’m tired of hearing it. You’re clearly an intelligent guy, just stop trying to make connections that aren’t there. You sound like a first semester philosophy student trying to tie EVERYTHING happening in an election to Socrates.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Sep 8, 2010 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I made that comment in a comment section about pro wrestling. Why wouldn't I talk about pro wrestling?

Only done it twice, once yesterday and once in an article I wrote talking about Chael and the build to Silva/Sonnen.

1) PRIDE was pro wrestling, I’m sorry if people have a hard time grasping that. It was the evolution of pro wrestling in Japan. The creators have admitted as such, why can’t fans?

2) Chael borrowed heavily from the pro wrestling style of fight building. His shit talk went BEYOND just talking shit. Rashad/Rampage was shit talking. That was boxing like shit talking. Hardy/Davis was shit talking. Chael Sonnen was on another level. He created this persona (that people can’t tell if it’s real or not) and used it to sell the fight in an over-the-top manner. Chael has admitted this, why can’t fans accept it?

Luke and the rest of his agreers would have a point if people were looking at, say BJ Penn/Edgar II and trying to draw a parallel to, let’s say Bret and Owen Hart’s two matches (WM X and SS’ 94) where no one though Owen (Frankie) would win and he shocked everyone and no one picked him to win the rematch even though he won fair and square. I can understand people getting upset about dumb shit like that.

Or dumb shit like people overusing inappropriate terminology. KAYFABE should never be used in talking about ANYTHING but wrestling. You’re a fool if you use that word. I’m sorry. Or if people called the Josh Koscheck/Yves Lavigne shit an “angle” to get the match over. Or saying a fighter “bladed” during a match if he bleeds. Dumb shit like that, I agree. But I’ve seen NO ONE of any consequence use that incorrect terminology. People are overexaggerating to prove a non-existent point.

Diss pro wrestling all you want, no need to diss people that liked it/like it.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 6:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

The straw man is strong with this one.

I’ve never said a single ill word about wrestling fans. I just think wrestling is stupid. Just like Jersey Shore, Desperate Housewives, and any show involving Flava Flav.But you know what, how about I play your game. You find the quote where I diss the people who like/liked pro wrestling. I’ll wait, buddy.

The rest of your comment is ludicrous and does not bear any merit.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Sep 8, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm talking about Thomas, not you.

When people say “you”, they aren’t always talking about YOU, they mean “you” as in “one”.

“Diss pro wrestling all one wants, no need to diss people that liked it.”

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

If I allowed everything said on the internet to offend me then my brain would of exploded sometime around 1998. I fully agree whit the point that fans were upset due to the bashing of them personally but then most of the things I like get bashed on the internet eventually anyway. Heck I think Luke has insulted D&D players somewhere along the way too, man if i actually cared about Luke generalizations of what kind of person I am I would just have to go die. Good thing I don’t base my value or self worth on internet discussions. My favorite movie of all time is “Streets fo Fire” but I don’t expect anyone else to share my opinions or likes, heck I assume that most people will disagree(if not outright point and laugh :D ) but in the end it’s all good because I’m not crazy enough to try and force my beliefs on anyone else.

There is nothing at all wrong with liking or disliking anything it’s when you start to believe that your personal preferences are more important or valid or factual than they actually are that you run into trouble. My only real issue with the bashing of pro wrestling fans is the utter hypocricy of doing it on a MMA site and then getting upset when someone from the general population bashes you in a similar fashion. In the end we all suck in one way or the other, we are only human, no reason to go bashing anyone with generalizations…… Well unless it’s for the purposes of comedy :D

by who me on Sep 8, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's not about "offending"

It’s about explaining why some people have an issue with what he said.

/sarcasm
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun

by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 8, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just to help out a little

here’s the thread where Luke made these comments.

http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/8/17/1628450/latest-estimates-of-ufc-117-pay

Josh Barnett is a thrice proven juicer with a pro wrestling mindset and a personality that would lead you to believe he's never had a romantic encounter that didn’t start with "you gotta pay me upfront."

by Fake Emcee on Sep 8, 2010 2:05 AM EDT reply actions  

In fairness to pro wrestling fans

You shouldn’t feel so bad. I said on MMA Nation (I forget which day) that I’d like to treat MMA fans like the Inlgorious Basterds treat the Nazis at the end of the movie: lock them in the venue while they burn alive and shoot them from an elevated position. Obviously some are going to be pro wrestling fans, so that’s fine, too. But it’s not like I’ve ever defended MMA fans. I’ve got a long, well-documented history of blasting them every chance I get.

Follow me on Twitter: @MMANation.

by Luke Thomas on Sep 8, 2010 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

"I’ve got a long, well-documented history of blasting them every chance I get."

I’m having some difficulty putting together a list of things that you defend.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 8, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Video pornography, not still pictures.

That was his best use of Ustream ever.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Sep 8, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

2. America

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 8, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

3. Overeem

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
Reasoning will never make a man correct an ill opinion, which by reasoning he never acquired. -Jonathan Swift

by Scott C. Broussard on Sep 8, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

We live in a country that spends the same amount of man-hours that have currently been invested in Wikipedia watching ads on ABC every single Saturday. Perhaps it has to do with our relative positions – I’m too occupied with actually generating a following to begin writing off entire portions of the electorate, whereas you enjoy the privilege of actually steering the dialogue as opposed to criticizing it from the fringes.

I’m a progressive atheist pothead living in Colorado Springs reading Howard Zinn and Thus Spoke Zarathustra (again) – I know a thing or two about being disgusted by the taste and sentiments of people around you. However, some of my most meaningful relationships have been with people that I have vehemently disagreed with on fundamental issues I consider core to my being. Calling it humility defeats the purpose – I view it as trying to learn whatever I can from whomever I can.

I love Mencken – I had faith in Thomas Frank, but I just don’t think there will ever be another acerbic soothsayer of that quality (however, Senator Al Franken is the shit). And I don’t disagree that pro wrestling fans seek to defend what really is a silly thing for an adult to follow (no sillier than Real Housewives or other fare, but like me I imagine you steer clear of those as well) by inflating what is a very real correlation with combat sport fight-hyping overall. But come on, grumpy Gus. If I’m not insanely cynical about the prospect of MMA fans evolving into actual sports fans, then you have no excuse.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 8, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's a brilliant quote

by the way.

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 8, 2010 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

IT
IS
FAKE

THERE, I SAID IT!

by ThaiGae on Sep 8, 2010 2:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Dude

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 8, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Favritegotevj9_small
An Open Letter to Nick Diaz
Tatum_small
Aristotle Knows Nick Diaz Didn't Cheat
Walshrun_small
5 Reasons I Hate MMA
Royce_09_small
Call To Nominate New Bloody Elbow Moderators
Obp_small
The Official BE UFC Drinking Game

Recent FanPosts

Logo_d__small
Roll a phat one for Nick Diaz
Cg_small
Perceptions Regarding Diaz v. Condit Decision Distorted by the Judging Chameleon
Cf_small
George Rush St. Pierre BJJ Coach Renzon Gracie Black belt John Danaher
Jules-winfield-7_small
In Defense of Nick Diaz
208730_10150164903466743_503301742_7348043_3232767_n_small
Top Five: Fights To Look Forward To
Bruce-lee-lats_small
Calling for Nick Diaz to be released makes no sense.
Afro_small
The UFC Has Been Spared Once Again...This Time by Carlos Condit

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings