Where Are the Stars? As UFC Main Eventers Age, No Replacements in Sight
The UFC has a problem. That in itself seems unbelievable. In the middle of an unprecedented run of success, the promotion seems like it can do no wrong. No mere mortal can stop the Zuffa juggernaut. Affliction, Pride, the IFL - they've all fallen victim to the UFC's superior promotion, talent, and presentation. But father time? There's no stopping him.
The UFC's top stars are old. There's no getting around it. Randy Couture is 47. Chuck Liddell just hit the big four oh. Anderson Silva is 35. Brock Lesnar is 33. Rampage is 32. BJ Penn is an ancient 31. Forrest Griffin is as well. Even Georges St. Pierre sees 30 creeping up on him.
These are the UFC's biggest stars, the guys who draw the big money on PPV. All but Forrest get a percentage of the pay per views they appear on. These men are the difference between a show drawing a basement level number and drawing a million or more buys. They are also men in desperate need of replacements.
Couture and Liddell have one foot out the door already. Rampage seems disinterested and distracted. Silva and Penn may have peaked athletically and a steep decline seems possible. Lesnar has quit million dollar a year jobs before, and on a whim. New blood is needed, fighters in the position to pick up the slack for the guys who built the company into a powerhouse.
But when I look to see who is waiting in the wings, the cupboard seems awfully barren.
Everyone knows that The Ultimate Fighter changed the course of MMA history. It catapulted the UFC and the fighters I've mentioned into the stratosphere. But all of the UFC's major stars predate TUF except Griffin. These were established names before the boom. Even St. Pierre, who is the most recent Zuffa creation, first won a UFC title all the way back in 2006. Since that time, only Lesnar has come to the forefront, and he was a premade star built by the WWE and unleashed on the MMA world.
Where are the stars?
The UFC has done a great job using reality television to populate the middle of their cards with recognizable talent. But they haven't been succesful in building the next big thing. TUF has been used as a television vehicle for fringe prospects like Amir Saddolah and never wills like Kimbo Slice. It's brought us gatekeepers like Nate Diaz and Joe Stevenson, quality fighters but not fighters with the potential to replace Chuck Liddell. Where are the mega prospects? Why wasn't Jon Jones featured in a season of reality television? Where was Cain Velasquez? How big a star would Phil Davis be with a TUF title under his belt? Those are men with potential to be huge stars. Instead, they feel like strangers to many UFC fans, fans that would rather give their emotional energy and support to the fighters they feel they know.
We've seen how powerful a tool reality television can be. Use it to take real blue chip prospects - the Mo Lawals, Ben Askrens, and Cain Velasquezs of the world - and make them television stars. Then, if they pan out at the top level of the fight game, you have a guy primed and ready to take the world by storm. You have the next Chuck Liddell and not the next Frankie Edgar - a great fighter who couldn't draw 5000 people on the power of his name to any arena in the world.
203 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting Mr. Snowden
I find myself often wondering the same things. When the Pride early Zuffa era fighters retire leave etc. Where do we go from there?
Ken Shamrock went to WWF billed as "The worlds most dangerous man", after UFC 100 Frank Mir Could use his kayfabe Skills and go to WWE as " The worlds most dangerous Cabbage Patch!!"
by lesnarhypetrain on Sep 28, 2010 11:54 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
The fact that there has been a fun of dominant champions has a lot to do with the lack of new stars.
There are more name fighters at LHW than anywhere else partially because of the number of past champions. The next generation of stars will be the guys that smash through Lesnar, Silva, GSP etc.
like the guy that "smashed" Bj
Seems to be a star.
"Even Hulkamania wouldn't get you out of this hold"
"True strength is not always shown through victory. Stand up, try again and display strength of heart."
by the-gentle-way on Sep 28, 2010 4:09 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Give him a little time and he may be, LW really don't have a lot of star power.
But if the title switches hands a few times and a handful of guys end up in main events, the division will have a few fan favorites.
The title threw me off base. I think the UFC does have the row of talented stars but the marketing push has not been behind them. But like in all sports as one star fades another rises, and the marketing push will shift with that star.
To me that’s a recipe for decline. I agree that talented athletes will rise to replace the aging veterans. But in combat sports that’s not the same thing as a “star.” Guys filled Tyson’s shoes, even a better fighter like Lewis. But they weren’t stars and the business declined. That’s my fear.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 28, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I think its just the UFC playing it safe and not hitching all its wagons to a horse that might fail on them like we’re seeing at strikeforce.
agreed
There is a purgatorial period of time on our hands right now, validation does seem evident for Bones, but it will have to wait until October 23rd for Cain. If he pulls it off in a dominating fashion, then there will be two stars to watch. Charisma does seem to elude both, but then again they’re still relatively green and maybe they’ll take the role and do it justice.
We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well that Death will tremble to take us." - Charles Bukowski
imminent not evident
We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well that Death will tremble to take us." - Charles Bukowski
Recipe from WWE?
The WWE uses wrestling legends who have a long-standing brand to keep fans drawn to the label and uses fights against these legends to promote their up-and-coming fighters.
I think the UFC will be alright and have plenty of talent in most divisions. I think they [UFC] have favorites— some worthy (i.e.— Jon Jones) and some not (i.e.— Kang).
I think that there will always be debate about who should be in title contention and that will always lead some to believe that the UFC might have a decline, but I think with them expanding into new markets every year— I think the UFC will be bigger (worldwide) than soccer in about 5 years.
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
the difference is
in the WWE the new stars can carry the old guys in the ring or even let them win. That won’t work in an actual sport.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Nate Wilcox on Sep 28, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
But, using them to springboard your resume is essentially what the WWE does with their older names.
It’s not so much that you allow someone to win— it’s that the Matt Hughes, Gracie fighting family, and Chuck Lidell’s have a following that goes beyond wins & losses. A young aspiring fighter can get in and fight these guys and get recognition that he wouldn’t get fighting a guy who ALSO is an aspiring fighter.
I think we have to also remember that for every “serious & knowledgeable” MMA fan that is out there, that there is probably 3-4 casual MMA fans who just like to see “a good ol’ fight” and really don’t have much knowledge of aspiring or lesser known names.
Fighting the well-known brands give them a chance to showcase their talents to that audience.
Right or wrong— Just a thought. :-)
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah
it’s just that letting Chuck in the ring with Jon Jones would be utterly sadistic.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
True.
But, maybe not [hypothetically] moving him up a weight class and having him fight a Randy Couture?
I’m not saying Jon Jones needs any more “hyping”, but a Bader could use a good “legend” fight under his belt.
I think he is really good, but outside of the hardcore MMA fans— he’s not that well known (IMO).
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Very.
MMA requires very little understanding of rules unlike futbol (complicated) and football (super complicated). Basketball is starting to go global, but it too is complicated and favors tall people.
Fighting is far more universal than any other sport. Only running sports compare and running isn’t multi-faceted enough to pack stadiums monthly.
MMA gyms are rapidly popping up all over the world. Little kids are starting to be raised on it now. In 10 years these kids will be pros and will forever reshape MMA as we know it. Champions will continue to get younger, stronger, faster and more skilled. Moves will change, techniques will change. Expect MMA in 10 years to look as different from today as today looks from 20 years ago.
Also, consider the fight promotions taht Zuffa has put on all over the world and the draws that have been made.
Why would it be “ridiculous” (as you seem to be suggesting) that MMA won’t be bigger than soccer/futbol?
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions
You would think this would be true. But I watched a Bellator event at a restaurant with several non-MMA fans. It just happened to be on the TV and they knew I had a background in fighting. You’d be shocked at how hard it was to explain the ground game to them. I remember explaining the techniques in detail, explaining how you executed a sweep, talked about wrist control. I thought I was doing so well. Then a guy said “So, that guy was just a lot stronger than the other fellow?”
MMA is complicated.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 28, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Our passion and our sport is not necessarily for everyone
You must have sounded like the most boring guy in the room.
Seriously, since this is stuff we’re familiar with its fun to talk about it. But for someone who doesn’t care, having to learn about the technicalities can be lame.
Its like a dungeons and dragons player explaining why a mage is stronger than a thief or whatever. I would be deathly bored trying to understand his passion.
a mage stronger than a thief?!?!
sir you knowest not of that which you speak
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Nate Wilcox on Sep 28, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
NNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDDD!
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Sep 28, 2010 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
This ^
… Don’t forget the much sought after Mace +3!
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions
But, does the casual fan watch MMA for technique and "sweeps"?
I would say “no”.
I think they watch it for the sheer brutality of the sport.
Why do fans and casual fans “yawn” at Anderson Silva fights or wrestlers who can keep a fight on the ground and use control for 3+ rds? Why does Dana seemingly “prefer” to see fights be finished rather than go the distance?
It’s what sells!
And, I think that’s what anybody can rap their head around— one guy beating the snot out of another guy gladiator like.
Even if that’s NOT what you and I would consider MMA to be— that’s the perception to the casual fan.
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I think this goes both ways.
I never liked MMA as a casual fan BECAUSE of the brutality. Once I got it and figured out how much technique and strategy was actually involved, I became a big fan.
by KatGirl on Sep 28, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I have no idea what the casual fan likes. Sometimes you hear crowds booing a great fight between two no-name fighters, and then later in the main event the same crowd cheers when one guy gets to side control. I don’t get why this happens, but I’ve noticed it a lot recently.
"There's this image that you have, this interior image of something that's absolutely perfect, and that's your signpost, your guide. And you'll never get there. But without it you'll never get anywhere."
From guardian.co.uk:
More than 18 million viewers watched live coverage of the 2010 World Cup final last night, Sunday 11 July – with more than four out of five viewers choosing the BBC’s advertising-free football over the ITV alternative.
That was on great britain only, wich has an estimated population of 60 million.
Your analysis is logical and it may become fact, but not in five years.
You know who I pray to? Joe Pesci. Joe Pesci. Two reasons; first of all, I think he's a good actor. Okay. To me, that counts. Second; he looks like a guy who can get things done. Joe Pesci doesn't fuck around. Doesn't fuck around.
George Carlin
Lisen, I'm no statistician. haha!
I’m just a fan of the sport like everyone else. But, to suggest that soccer/futbol is “untouchable” is flaw.
Riddle me this?
How well did the World Cup do in US in 2010 and 2006? Hasn’t the US had a slow build of support for the Cup? And it’s been around since like 1930 or something like that, right?
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions
You said "worldwide"
Worlwide there’s no other sport as popular as soccer.
It’s not even close.
My point was that it is a favorite of many nations, but it has yet to really penetrate the US.
MMA is in every nation and Zuffa is doing a great job of expanding and capitalizing in a very short amount of time.
Again, I’m not slighting soccer/futbol— but looking at how fast it’s growing why would it be ridiculous to say that it might be bigger?
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions
I used to think that soccer translated best to people in countries that didn’t have electricity and / or couldn’t afford actual entertainment, but soccer is very popular in the UK so there goes that theory.
I have also since realized that I will never understand what entertains the masses. Soccer, Baseball, Nascar, Jersey Shore, The Big Bang Theory… I just don’t get it.
Bowling wizened up though
Lots of places dimmed the lights and let you drink while you play. I still won’t go bowling, but the booze makes me consider it.
Again, no.
The 2010 World Cup Final set a new record for the most watched soccer game in U.S. history Sunday when 24.3 million people watched the Spain versus Netherlands game on ABC and Univision, according to Nielsen.
Univision drew 8.821 million viewers, while ABC drew 15.45 million viewers according to Nielsen fast-nationals.
The 2010 World Cup set another record in the United States by being the most-viewed World Cup ever on English-language TV. The 64-match World Cup averaged a 2.1 U.S. rating and 3.261 million viewers on ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC, up 31% in ratings and 41% in viewership from 2006 (1.6, 2.316 mil).
You know who I pray to? Joe Pesci. Joe Pesci. Two reasons; first of all, I think he's a good actor. Okay. To me, that counts. Second; he looks like a guy who can get things done. Joe Pesci doesn't fuck around. Doesn't fuck around.
George Carlin
Like I´ve said before. It may happen — MMA > soccer — but not in 5 years.
You know who I pray to? Joe Pesci. Joe Pesci. Two reasons; first of all, I think he's a good actor. Okay. To me, that counts. Second; he looks like a guy who can get things done. Joe Pesci doesn't fuck around. Doesn't fuck around.
George Carlin
I have no idea why you talk about the US market, but worldwide the finale has been watched by 700+million people. thats untouchable for a combat sport.
I love MMA but you have to realize its not for everybody.
It's also only been "really" marketed on a global scale for abou 10 years.
Not saying it will pass soccer tomorrow, but in 5 years I think it will compete— 10 years for sure (at this current rate of growth).
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Even at the current state of growth, it’s not going to be anywhere near the popularity of soccer on a global scale in five or ten years. Not even close.
I know it’s growing fast in North America, parts of Europe and possibly some of South America, but the rest of the world is pretty much still left out. I live in Sweden and while it’s growing it’s still very much a niche thing, which most people except some younger males have no clue about..
Also, just because it’s growing right now, there’s nothing to say that it will continue to do so at the same rate forever. But that is of course a matter of opinion and guessing, so I can’t say for sure whether you’re wrong or right, but in my humble opinion I think you’re being a bit too optimistic.
by Horselover Fat on Sep 28, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions
i feel bad for anyone
who thinks mma will be bigger than soccer. At least we don’t have guys calling soccer gay.
-for it to ever happen? not completely ridiculous.
-in just 5 years? ridiculous.
There’s over 150 years of legitimately organized professional soccer history to catch up to. Well-paying (enough to not have another job) professional soccer worldwide has so many more available slots than professional fighting may ever be able to sustain, and the top-level salaries all the way on down the payscale are at least 10x their equivalent levels in MMA.
Plus, even for equal money, most people would choose the sport where they don’t get beat up.
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Sep 28, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
don´t even bring it to the salarie discussion because it´s not fair. ;)
You know who I pray to? Joe Pesci. Joe Pesci. Two reasons; first of all, I think he's a good actor. Okay. To me, that counts. Second; he looks like a guy who can get things done. Joe Pesci doesn't fuck around. Doesn't fuck around.
George Carlin
Would you pay 50 bucks for one soccer match?
Listen, I respect your opinion…
… But I disagree.
Unlike its boxing and wrestling predecessors, MMA brings fans a more exciting, unpredictable match. In boxing, fighters often punch it out for 12 full rounds, ending in a judge’s decision. But MMA fights keep viewers on their toes, usually ending in bloody knockouts or in a crazy submission hold. Though the giant, gold-plated belt also exists here, there is no need for the manufactured drama of pro-wrestling.
MMA offers real people fighting in real matches. It combines fighting styles from ALL OVER the world. Pay-per-view sales have grown steadily over the past few years. Even with a price tag of $40 to $50, the UFC has no problem drawing in millions per fight, and those figures don’t count the thousands of fans who tune in at sports bars across the world.
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I know what MMA offers, and that’s why I love it. you don’t need to drop the sales pitch on me. Yes, it is exciting, unpredictable, and keeps viewers on their toes. So does soccer. Different people, but they get excited about it nonetheless. I don’t even like soccer at all.
I’m not gonna go digging up numbers on how much more revenue Futbol/Soccer generates. hundreds of millions of people every year pay some money to watch Soccer. not at 50$ a pop, but there are thousands upon thousands of games played.
European, Asian, and South American Soccer stadiums are packed with tens of times more fans than any UFC Event, and equivalent to any Pride Event, but for, again, thousands upon thousands of games a year.
The numbers for Soccer and MMA are not even in the same galaxy at this point, and I’m willing to venture that it’s not physically possible to bridge that canyon in 5 years, probably much longer, likely not ever in any reasonable amount of time.
Then there’s just the basic economics of it. Even with MMA gyms popping up everywhere, it is and always will be more expensive to get into (equipment, higher likelihood of needing healthcare). In MMA, every person needs their own equipment. With soccer, 15 poor kids from the slums need just one ball and some open ground.
I respect your opinion, and I’ve read your other comments as well, but it just doesn’t add up.
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Sep 28, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Not even a ball
Here in Brazil as kids we play soccer with balls made of paper sheets, socks, wathever. It’s the cheapest sport.
MMA bigger than soccer worldwide?
That´s insane.
I presume you´re american, right?
Proud of it!
But, I also am a United States Marine and have travelled all over the world.
Listen… I’m not knocking soccer/futbol as it will always be a worldwide favorite…
… What I’m saying is that MMA is a year-round sport that doesn’t require much to host and put on that has ties to fighting styles from all over the world. Plus, it is centered around combat which has been popular of every culture since Greece had pankration fights in early 600 BC.
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
agree
And from what I´ve heard, two greek guys started pankration after a bad call by a soccer referee!
:P
You know who I pray to? Joe Pesci. Joe Pesci. Two reasons; first of all, I think he's a good actor. Okay. To me, that counts. Second; he looks like a guy who can get things done. Joe Pesci doesn't fuck around. Doesn't fuck around.
George Carlin
Ha! Touche'!
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Dude...
You must be out of your mind. Futbol is the biggest sport in the world. MMA will be EXTREMELY fortunate to surpass Hockey as a N. American sport within 5 yrs. I love MMA, but to suggest it will be the biggest sport in the world in 5 yrs is lunacy.
I think the UFC will be bigger (worldwide) than soccer in about 5 years.
Can I get your dealer’s number? Seriously, can I have his number? The shit I’ve been smoking is straight schwag.
"We should just concentrate on what we’re good at… Death Metal and interior design." – William Murderface
by Anthony Pace on Sep 28, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Bigger than soccer????
you are a moron if you really believe that soccer is the biggest sport on the planet and mma isnt even accepted in many places (i.e germany, new york)
I agree with the previous poster. The reason there is such a bubble of talent in the LHW division is these guys either passed the title around or they were built up in separate promotions and were champs in their company. When there is only 1 guy at the top people are always going to weight contenders against the champ. If they fall short they lose some of their marketability unless they can jump right back in.
Machida just lost the belt but he hasn’t fought since being out with an injury. Carwin fell short and needs to get back in the mix. Despite being a heal Chael could have retained and even gained more star power if he didn’t cheat and was able to take the rematch with Silva. The rest of the middle weight division is lacking star power. Welterweight is tough with all the AKA guys smothering most potential up and comers.
I think one of the other factors that is missing is not having alternate competitions on the side of the actual championship belt. Pride seemed to do that with a lot of their Gran Prix tourneys. I hate to mention pro-wrestling but they do it also with different titled belts. Could they have a fight night champ or does that just sound corny?
Why can’t the UFC hold an open weight or limited weight tourney out of the US? Would that get them in trouble with the US commissions?
Frankie Edgar – a great fighter who couldn’t draw 5000 people on the power of his name to any arena in the world.
I think the people of New Jersey would disagree. He could definitely draw 5k there. Seemed like a pointless shot in an otherwise good article.
http://www.instrength.com
i also live in nj
and no one gives a shit about edgar, maybe ull get the hometown toms river crowd, but thats it
We have a saying back home that if your coming on, COME ON!!!!
Toms River folks are more into their Little League team than Frankie Edgar.
by memitim on Sep 28, 2010 5:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I spend 9 months out of the year in NJ
If I go ask Joe Six-Pack in the pizza shop if he knows Frankie Edgar, he’ll tell me to pick a slice or fuck off.
"We should just concentrate on what we’re good at… Death Metal and interior design." – William Murderface
by Anthony Pace on Sep 28, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions
GTL > MMA
"We should just concentrate on what we’re good at… Death Metal and interior design." – William Murderface
by Anthony Pace on Sep 28, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
They told you?
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
Twitter Handle = @xFenixKnightx
by xFenixKnightx on Sep 28, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I do 95% of my ufc viewing at bars, usually in Philadelphia but sometimes locally in South Jersey. I watched 118 at a local bar, Kaminski’s in Cherry Hill, and there was exactly 1 guy going apeshit for Frankie Edgar, and a whole lot of non-interest otherwise. Most people (including myself) were rooting for BJ Penn (even though I dislike him).
I dont think MMA fighters really benefit a whole lot from that “US geographic market” type thing. BJ Penn being the anomaly. Nationalities seem to work better.
That’s kind of a narrow point of view, but whatever. I think there are lots of anomalies in terms of what you’re talking about. A couple of my friends live in Jersey and are the biggest Frank Edgar fans ever…and they don’t even really like the UFC. They say he’s super popular in his hood.
http://www.instrength.com
I think
that one of the problems with the TUF method of building prospects is the contract which is pretty limiting (I think). It probably makes more financial sense for Jon Jones (or any prospect with a high “celing”) to take a smaller contract early and then resign for a larger contract. The TUF contract isn’t quite so large and I think it’s pretty long. I could be wrong but I think I read about this stuff long ago
Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.
by Kidroll on Sep 28, 2010 11:58 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
yup
and it’s scared the best prospects off from the show
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Nate Wilcox on Sep 28, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
And that is the issue with how the UFC markets their prospects. It seems like they just can’t seem to figure out how to market people that aren’t on the show and the people that are on the show just aren’t the world beaters that turn into champions so it seems like a catch 22. The UFC (and MMA in general since the demise of pride) do everything so well. Joe Silva does a wonderful job with the matchmaking, Dana for all his faults is a personality that the mainstream sports media listens to which was his main goal imo, they just can’t seem to market anything outside of TUF and Brock. look how they couldn’t market anderson silva and all he did was destroy his competition in a manner that the casual fan loves.
Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.
well Joe Silva had a role there
the biggest problem with anderson silva was they gave him 3 straight title challengers who didn’t challenge him. he got bored and stopped trying. He was primed for a break out with the Cote fight. But after Cote, Leites and Maia, he was permanently ruined as a draw as a middleweight.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Nate Wilcox on Sep 28, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I'll defer to your knowledge
but was anderson a big ppv draw before those fights? I thought he wasn’t. Also 185 was kinda drained of viable challengers, I’m not for forcing Anderson to fight at 205 but they just couldn’t get the new PPV purchasers (read not the online MMA community) to be interested in him…
Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.
no he wasnt a draw
but they put a big push behind him in advance of the cote fight — remember when they featured him on spike tv KO’ing James Irvin? — and it went flat when the fight sucked.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
Which begs another question
as dominant and “flashy” as anderson silva was before the cote fight, the ufc still couldn’t market him properly. Is it just the language barrier? Can the ufc market a star. Is it a problem with the ufc or markeing in general in mma? makes you wonder a bit.
Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.
I think that the UFC, with its pro wrestling and reality TV style of making stars, has NO IDEA how to produce a package that doesn’t heavily feature trash-talking in promotion of a fight. And before he had a foil in Chael Sonnen, there was never a compelling challenger, someone who offered more than “I think I can win.”
The answer with Anderson Silva was to have had him fighting more frequently, emptying out the division, then fighting permanently up at 205. Fights with Cote and Leites were perfunctory, as neither was a Top 5 middleweight. Anderson was better suited to being marketed around his winning streak, currently the longest in UFC history, and the question as to whether anyone can beat him. Now that the bloom is somewhat off the rose, he needs to destroy a couple more folks to get back that air of invincibility that could have aided his marketability.
To be honest, they haven’t done all that great a job with the more recent TUF winners, either. Escudero just got the boot, Pearson and Wilks aren’t exactly even co-maineventing shows, Sadollah hasn’t exactly set the world on fire. Can’t say much about McGee yet. Bader is the only one (post TUF5) who has actually gotten some exposure.
Don't like wrestling in MMA? Go watch K-1.
Can't deal with the occasional boring fight? Let me introduce you to ROH.
Dear Mr. White - would it kill you to drop a few f-bombs less?
by Monday Morning Martial Artist on Sep 28, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
that's the problem
the TUF guys have a ceiling on their potential because of limited abilities.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
yep
and it’s almost backwards, the tuf guys are marketed much more than the prospects (jon jones, evan dunham etc) yet they are almost all, as a rule, less talented, have a lower ceiling, and less exciting. It’s almost backwards.
Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.
But that’s why they need to feed TUF guys to the prospects on Fight Night shows. Jason McDonald almost made a name for himself as a “TUF Killer,” and had they invested in that narrative, they probably could have built up a McDonald vs. Grove, then a McDonald vs. Bisping. Any weight class that has a glut of TUF alums could be wiped out from the bottom up by an up and comer like Jon Jones or Phil Hughes. Remember what Anthony Johnson did to Tommy Speer?
And Nelson. But it’s almost tough to count him since he was so experienced beforehand.
by BurtBacharach on Sep 28, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
sooo, if they actually wanted TUF to get better again, they could just make the prize contract much better?
they (SpikeTV included) must not want to change TUF back into an actual legit talent search.
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Sep 28, 2010 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
There is no reason they can't have idiots and legit fighters at the same time though.
Season one is an example of this.
it seems like everywhere i look, Zuffa is set on making sure fighter pay grows as slowly as possible. like the WEC still being in existence, and apparent unwillingness to revamp the TUF prize.
I mean, I guess it makes sense for “management” to do that, but it pisses me off. For the UFC to ever go full-on mainstream legit, there are certain inevitabilities they must accept, like having better media relations, willingness to work with a real freaking TV channel instead of FratboyTV (Spike) and The Outdoor Life Network (Vs), and a bigger piece of the pie in some way, shape, or form for the fighters. It’s just shit that every truly major sport has to deal with.
I think the Zuffa executives may be getting to a point where maintaining absolute control is creeping up on truly growing the sport on the priority list, and it’s a difficult balance to try to strike.
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Sep 28, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Better Show
Part of the detraction from getting better talent has to be the format. It would also be more interesting, but more expensive to produce to watch them train as professionals in their gyms of choice. I would personally be much more interested to watch guys trying to make it to the next level train and go about their daily lives than see a concocted scenario in a house full of morons.
This comment is worth a rec
The UFC has made no secret that it’s willing to sign fighters it thinks are potential prospects without having them go through TUF. Most recent example I can think of is Chris Tuschererhcher who tried out for the heavyweights season, didn’t make it but was brought straight to the UFC.
Of course he may be regretting that decision after getting his testicles punted into the outfield, barely beating Hague and then getting shellacked by Schaub, but the point stands. The UFC doesn’t really see TUF as a star making show or as a real way to build up fighters anymore.
Get rid of the ramp!
Edgar is enjoyable to watch, Maynard, nah. Also, they aren’t the future.
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
Twitter Handle = @xFenixKnightx
by xFenixKnightx on Sep 28, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
The few fighters that you mentioned such as Jon Jones & Cain Valasquez will benefit in the spotlight once they are able to knock off a few of the “old guard”. Cain Valasquez will become huge if he’s able to beat BROCKLENSAR in front of a 1mil different households.
by JONBONESJONES79 on Sep 28, 2010 12:00 PM EDT reply actions
I agree he will become a star. But he could become a draw, the difference between being Randy Couture or being Rich Franklin, with a concerted promotional push.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 28, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
What makes you say that Silva and Penn have peaked in their atheletic careers and also how would you suggest Zuffa build these other guys into stars? Interesting and provoking article Snowden, well done.
Go get that bread, Kimbo Slice. - Mike Fagan
by SouthAlaBamaRampage on Sep 28, 2010 12:07 PM EDT reply actions
I’d like to see more promotional time given to these guys on television. Across the board. I was shocked to see Chuck and Tito as coaches recently on TUF. That’s the past.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 28, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Is it not the case that the fight between the coaches at the end of a season of TUF benefits greatly from the exposure and build up the show gives? If they decided to break with recent tradition and not bother having the coaches fight at the end of each season, they could promote some guys like Edgar much more easily, but I can’t see the UFC doing that.
"The men who get on best with women are those that get on best without them" Lee Christmas
by StevenGiles on Sep 28, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Isn’t that kind of a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” scenario?
If they put Tito/Chuck in as coaches, people complain that they should be marketing the guys who are the present and future of the sport.
If they put their biggest stars on as coaches (like now with GSP/Koscheck) people complain that they’re holding up a belt.
Resident Capologist
Follow me on Twitter @clrkaitken. Or don't. Whatever.
The UFC needs to pitch Spike a weekly MMA show like MMA Live (MMA Live doesn’t work. It comes on at midnight on a week day). They could conduct interviews, show highlights and Dana can come on and show his face once a week.
A weekly FN with potential stars could help aswell.
If you want to hear my opinion on Les Miles go to BJPenn.com.
by DayGeaux on Sep 28, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Weekly FN filled with prospects
Go get that bread, Kimbo Slice. - Mike Fagan
by SouthAlaBamaRampage on Sep 28, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Friday Night Fights
How about an MMA version of Friday Night Fights. No title contenders, just up and coming fighters in their first or second UFC fight and the occasional Lytle/Serra type matchup that is entertaining but has no title implications.
SPIKE MMA LIVE type show would be awesome
Plus it would keep people up to date with fighters. Maybe show a few highlights and give them a very brief bio where theyre from when they started etc.
by Papercut Elbow on Sep 28, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions
how bout they figure out how to get programming on a real TV channel
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Sep 28, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Right now MMA Live is on ESPN. But it’s on at midnight on a Tuesday or something. Network TV isn’t alll it’s cfracked up to be plus casuals know that Spike has the MMA they want.
Baby steps. Plus Spke allows them to present thier information anyway they like with whomever they like.
If you want to hear my opinion on Les Miles go to BJPenn.com.
baby steps is right, and yeah Network TV is only right when the requisite bargaining power, but its probably needed in order to run with the big boys.
and if they want to run with the big boys, there are certain realities they’re eventually going to have to accept, like not having complete control of the presentation of all information.
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Sep 28, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yup. That and the fact that they need to reach fans who don’t watch Spike. MMA Live is on Friday morning at 12:00am — hardly a horrible timeslot. In fact, I’d argue that that spot is perfect, because it comes after the big sports have gone off, and potentially can be led in by Sportscenter. Furthermore, UFC REALLY needs to promote the post-PPV MMA Live shows. If fans were trained to tune into ESPN2 immediately after the shows ended, they could start to build synergy, and build momentum from one show to the next.
I’ve never seen it on during the day. Online it says
Thursday at 1AM ET / 10 PM PT on ESPN2 and always on ESPN.com.
If you want to hear my opinion on Les Miles go to BJPenn.com.
I would like to see the UFC throw out their big December\New Year’s card and put it on ESPN. Put Brock, GSP, and another big name on ESPN in prime time on a night that doesn’t have football or anything else that could stray viewers.
It could hurt in the short term, but I think it would help their long term growth immensely.
If you want to hear my opinion on Les Miles go to BJPenn.com.
Now is the perfect time to revamp TUF
While Sonnen is suspended and Anderson is healing, put them on there.
In addition, rework the premise regarding the contract – either a shorter contract, a higher initial payout, or both. What started as a great deal for up-and-coming fighters is now a detriment to getting top talent into TUF.
As to the perceived star problem in general, I think the coming group of new school guys (Jones, Davis, Askren, Hendricks and the like will fill those rolls.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
As for being well rounded... "The fox devises many strategies, the hedgehog only one, but he uses it very effectively." -Archilochus
by BigDNotDallas on Sep 28, 2010 1:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Well after the terrible Bisping/Henderson season
I can see why they went with that lineup. As big a fan as I am of his fights, Dan Henderson wasn’t exactly thrilling TV.
Get rid of the ramp!
That season is what got me into UFC
I spent more than a few months just waiting for Bisping to get his block knocked off. And Hendo delivered.
"Walk not down that road, I cannot tell you where it goes. Ask me no more questions - some things you're not meant to know." - The Sword
I must be reading too much BE . . .
. . . more and more I find myself agreeing with Snowden articles.
I love me some me.
Jonathan Snowden is the most negative MMA writer in the world. Seriously, as soon as I read the headline for this article, I knew it… another Jonathan Snowden article.
Sir, I think you need to spend some time reflecting on your negativity.
by Ilias on Sep 28, 2010 12:12 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
LOL
Last few articles before this one:
The Economics of MMA: Fight Night and the Sponsorship Game
The Economics of MMA: Inside the Bad Boy Empire
Whispers in the Night: What Were Mir and Cro Cop Talking About?
I can’t stand all this negativity! Please, give it a break already.
http://www.instrength.com
by Tim Burke on Sep 28, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 12 recs
This ^
Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p
Prediction (11:56a 9/27/10): 16-13 Bears
Factor?: Front 7 of the Bears will cause two (2) turnovers that put a kibosh on two effective drives by the Packers.
by ChicagoMarine on Sep 28, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
One year ago.
Kid Nate is the most negative MMA writer in the world. Seriously, as soon as I read the headline for this article, I knew it… another Kid Nate article.
Sir, I think you need to spend some time reflecting on your negativity.
If you want to hear my opinion on Les Miles go to BJPenn.com.
by DayGeaux on Sep 28, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Instead of looking at who wrote it, look at the article itself, and realize that this time, Snowden has merit to his argument.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
Reasoning will never make a man correct an ill opinion, which by reasoning he never acquired. -Jonathan Swift
by Scott C. Broussard on Sep 28, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
He does actually have merit to this article but he can’t help but put it across in his own little negative way.
I’d love to see a positive spin put on the topic “Every major star in the UFC is over the age of 30”
Resident Capologist
Follow me on Twitter @clrkaitken. Or don't. Whatever.
by clrkaitken on Sep 28, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Just a couple questions for curiosity sake.
What is the average age of a UFC fighter?
What is the average age of a UFC fighter in their first UFC fight?
How long does it take to build a star?
The last question is probably the most relevant. Evans fought on four fight nights before he even made a big show despite being a TUF winner and I would argue he didn’t really become a star withing his first two years with the company.
Title shots (preferably wins) and victories over name opponents make somebody into a star. There haven’t been a lot of Champions losing as of late outside of LHW.
Snowden: Sire, I have news!
Ilias: And what sort of news do you have? It’s not bad news, is it? You know I can’t take bad news. The day started out so good. I had a good night’s sleep, I had a good B.M. I don’t want to hear any bad news. So, what kind of news is it?
Snowden: Well, to be perfectly frank, it’s bad.
Ilias: [shouts] I knew it! I knew it would be bad news. Wait, I have an idea. Maybe if you tell me the bad news in a good way, it wouldn’t sound so bad.
Snowden: [thinking] The bad news in a good way. Yes, I can do that. The bad news in a good way. Well, here it goes.
by Shaun32887 on Sep 28, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I love the guy, but I don't think this is right
JDS is a stud and has an incredibly fan-friendly fighting style, but his English is spotty, and he’s way too nice/bland in interviews.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on Sep 28, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
He needs to grow his ponytail back I think
"The men who get on best with women are those that get on best without them" Lee Christmas
by StevenGiles on Sep 28, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Have you seen his wife??
He will never be a star as long as they keep showing her on the UFC´s countdowns.
You know who I pray to? Joe Pesci. Joe Pesci. Two reasons; first of all, I think he's a good actor. Okay. To me, that counts. Second; he looks like a guy who can get things done. Joe Pesci doesn't fuck around. Doesn't fuck around.
George Carlin
The UFC will be just fine...
Lesnar
Jon Jones
GSP
Velasquez
Nate Diaz
Sotiropoulos
Jlo
Condit
Baroni… I keed
Doomsday
Rumble
Rory MacDonald
YES Sanchez
Gerald Harris
Sonnen, believe it!
Brad Tavares
Bader
Phil Davis
These guys are already or can become major players.
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
Twitter Handle = @xFenixKnightx
Ditto!
The next stars are the guys that have great F*CKIN FIGHTS.
That’s it.
- The next guy that produces great knock-out victories.
- The next guy that comes through a great war with a great finish.
- - - - -
VEe is ANIMated!
by VeeisAnimated on Sep 28, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Lesnar is old
GSP is implied
Jon Jones, Phil Davis and Rory MacDonald I can see. That’s only because they’re so young and “inexperienced” in the UFC. The rest I don’t see the possibility or the star ship has already sailed (the majority of this list falls under this category)
perception is reality
by Marvin Malehooves on Sep 28, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Lesnar isn’t old. In 5 more years (when he really is old) there will be fighters we never even heard of getting in. He is still the future and is gonna help carry UFC for years to come.
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
Twitter Handle = @xFenixKnightx
by xFenixKnightx on Sep 28, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions
yea a couple more years
that’s the point of the article and so on
perception is reality
by Marvin Malehooves on Sep 28, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Can become major players and can become the rock stars of MMA are two very different things. The next generation of fighters is easy to see, the next generation of PPV draws not so much. What they need is a Kimbo Slice that can actually fight, a superstar for the masses.
Shogun Rua – 28
Forrest Griffin – 31
Rashad Evans – 31
GSP – 29
Lyoto Machida – 32
Chael Sonnen – 33
mma is fine
Shogun Rua – multiple knee injuries a very old 28
Forrest Griffin – is he really going to win another title?
Rashad Evans – is his fighting style very marketable…
GSP – Will lose the casuals if he continues the Greg Jackson Pointfighting style
Lyoto Machida – 32 getting old
Chael Sonnen – caught cheating, also not the most exciting fighter
MMA could be in trouble
Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.
by Kidroll on Sep 28, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The future stars will gain their namesake by crushing those people
Shogun Rua – Crushed Liddell
Forrest Griffin – TUF + Title, beat Rampage
Rashad Evans – Crushed Liddell
GSP – Crushed Hughes
Lyoto Machida – Smashed Rashad
Smashing other stars preferably with a KO is how stars are made.
too many ppv's
I think there were always be new stars in the making, but i do feel a ppv a month is overkill, especially when we have cards like crocop vs mir and i’m a fan of Mir.
I also think if UFC gets in trouble they will actually start modifying the rules to make the fights more ‘exciting’.
This is what I’m talking about. Too much UFC. I am fine with 1 UFC ppv a month, as long as there isn’t a fight night or TUF Finale or VS Fight Night shoehorned in the there amking it overkill. I love when theres actually one month in between UFC events. Like the 1st fight with Shogun/Machida. There hadn’t been an even in 4 weeks. I was SOOOOO pumped for Velasquez and Shogun and the fact that I actually missed MMA. I stopped watching Unleashed ages ago because it was overkill.
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
Twitter Handle = @xFenixKnightx
by xFenixKnightx on Sep 28, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Do you watch other sports?
Because I watch 15 hours of football every week, and that’s only NFL. I know people who watch another 10 hours of College football on top of that. Basically, if you can’t find 2-10 hours a week for your MMA fix, you’re a Casual Fan.
so If I work 80 hours a week, raise 2 children, and have interests outside of MMA and purely do not have time to watch MMA yet I have been interested in the sport and watched most everything I could get my hands on since 2003 I’m still a casual fan. You sir need a life.
Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.
by Kidroll on Sep 28, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
What's wrong with casual fans?
Cause I don’t know what the problem with that is.
Spare me the justifications for your Casual Fandom, and just accept it. If YOU don’t have enough time in your life to watch MMA, that doesn’t mean that it is somehow aberrant for others to have an appetite for a sport that exceeds 3 hours per month. I like my life just fine, thankyouverymuch, and I’m perfectly ok with the fact that I can allocate the 126 waking hours of my week in any way I see fit. Perhaps you should get that chip off of your shoulder and pop a couple of Chill Pills.
I have no problem with you devoting your time to MMA, it’s just the way you sling the term “Casual Fan” like it’s some sort of negative thing. The fact that you watch 10 hours of MMA makes you no better as a fan than anyone who has a passing interest in the sport. It’s no chip on my shoulder, just an observation of your internet MMA elitism.
…And I quit with the chill pills when I had the kids, don’t want the youngsters raised around that mess.
Support increased fighter pay. Support fighters unionizing.
Apparently, you also are short on time to read and comprehend. I never said I watch 10 hours of MMA each week. I said that I watch FIFTEEN hours of NFL football each week, which I admit is extreme, despite the fact that there are literally MILLIONS of people like me. Again, people who consider themselves hardcore fans devote significant time or money towards whatever they consider themselves “hardcore” about. If they don’t do that, they say that they follow the sport “casually.” This isn’t an insult; it’s a fact. Don’t project your hostility on me; I was making an observation, and anyone attacking me is attacking what they perceive me to be saying, rather than what I’m actually saying. Also, calling me an “elitist” can’t substitute for an actual argument about my being wrong about 2 hours a week being an appropriate threshold for delineating the line between Casual and Hardcore fandom. Feel free to affer a counterpoint
Madiq
Obnoxious…dude some people have more to do than devote all their time to MMA. Why don’t you go train MMA since it consumes your life. 2-10 hrs per week?!? I assume you have no job, kids, spouse, hobbies or goals. Fan boys like you are whats wrong with the sport. 2-10 hrs per week, come’on son!
Very interesting that I’m obnoxious for pointing out that wanting there to be less than two hours of MMA on television because it’s “too hard to keep up with,” when there are fans of other sports who watch FAR more hours, might mean that the fan might be more casual of a fan than he thinks. And yet, you calling me a “fanboy” who has no job, no spouse, no hobbies, and no aspirations (why didn’t you say I lived in my parents’ basement too?) was not obnoxious, right?
Look, I’m sorry that the elitism of some has turned “Casual Fan” into some sort of slur. I’m sorry that despite the negative stigma associated with fanboys, you apparently feel the need to validate yourself against them. But I’m not going to do that. I’m just going to be honest about the fact that I work as many hours as I’m comfortable with, and I spend as much or as little time on my interests and activities as I’m comfortable with. And if I manage my time well, and multitask whenever possible, I can satisfy my various appetites.
HOWEVER, I don’t think it’s unreasonable for UFC to see how much televised baseball airs, or football, or basketball, or soccer, and think that the appetite of the serious fan who’s “into” MMA might be greater than one three-hour PPV per month, regardless of whether that’s enough for casual fans. And for your information, there are many serious sports fans who somehow manage to hold down a job, have a social life, date, marry, raise children, and achieve goals. Surprisingly, these people can do all of these things. Are they better than MMA fans? I don’t think that they are. Just like I don’t think I’m better than you. Dude, I don’t even KNOW you…
I like guys like....
Charles Oliveria, and Evan Dunham. Really young, and really well rounded. That’s what I like about them, when you watch them you never know where the fights gonna go.
’’Apparently the the only way to kill a lion is by rear naked choke…personally I'd just kick it in the head.’’ – Bas Rutten
Also Jose Aldo, he’s stuck in the WEC without serious competition. But if he were to fight at 155 in the UFC, people could really get to know him, and fall in love with his skills.
’’Apparently the the only way to kill a lion is by rear naked choke…personally I'd just kick it in the head.’’ – Bas Rutten
TUF really needs to have a couple of seasons of fighters that are already mid tier names. Like Roy Nelson. Have 16 guys that probably deserve to be in the UFC already, pay them to be on the show. The hard part would be finding that many guys at one weight class not under contract.
Heck, how about a TUF 15 Road to the Title. And have guys like
McDonald
Condit
Guymon
Kampmann
Pierce
Ellenberger
Fitch
Brenneman
Howard
Hardy
Swick
And a couple others and have the tournament format of TUF to determine the #1 contender.
There's not really much of a promotional push that isn't just showing a fight
from what I can tell outside of TUF, shoddily taped/awfully EQ’d television advertisements and covert internet shit. And they’ve been recently using TUF to push 2 good fighters and a handful of below average ones at this point. I think you have a very valid point.
perception is reality
by Marvin Malehooves on Sep 28, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Great idea
These well established fighters in the prime of their careers can all go live in a house together and fight elite level opponents for free.
No
I said to pay them, not do it for free or for a contract.
hahaha
well played sir
So many stars are/were born from Pride GP’s. People love the idea of a knockout system to see who is the best.
Forever indebted to CroCop's left leg for getting me into MMA
by Well Read Idiot on Sep 28, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions
You make a good argument
But I’m not sure the current version of TUF will do what you want with it. Personally, I’m really tired of what TUF is doing and the show needs a kick in the ass. Even Survivor changes shit up every now and then. The Comeback season and the US-UK season were nods in that direction but I think they need to go further with that and make a serious effort to bring in higher quality guys. Just look at the hard sell Dana’s commentary and the editing crew bring to the fights on TUF. Case in point: Mitrione’s fight on Kimbo Season where he and his opponent gassed out after thirty seconds.
TUF alumni will continue to sometimes be at least main card/SPIKE Prelim quality fighters but the road they need to travel to be serious contenders is a very long one. You see these guys on this forgettable TV show with hard-to-watch fights with shouting in an acoustically challenged gym but then they tend to disappear into undercards for a long time.
The production on PPVs could use some sprucing up too (not that it isn’t still the best around), but I think that’s Dana’s baby.
I’d like to see them bite the bullet and produce some 24/7 type shows for some of these guys. The Cain Primetime should help. Of course, some guys just aren’t built to be stars.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 28, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought “Primetime” was their 24/7, the issue being that it’s not as good.
perception is reality
by Marvin Malehooves on Sep 28, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes. It doesn’t approach the same level of production and doesn’t do nearly as well getting the viewer inside access to the fighter’s actual life.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 28, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Exactly
I’m hardly a boxing fan and I think the 24/7s are great. HBO tries to generate interest in these boxers both inside and outside the ring. Hell, even the Calzaghe/Jones 24/7s were awesome.
Forgetting the differences in production, the Primetimes are mostly just training montages with a spastic camera and the occasional scene of the fighters outside the gym. There is only so much interest in the former, in my opinion. Who knows, maybe the fighters don’t want to give much access to their personal lives. Would many be as accommodating with their homes/families/lifestyles as Mayweather or Pacquiao?
My wife LOVES 24/7
And she abhors violent sports like boxing and MMA. She never watches the UFC version.
BOOSH
You know what this sounds like? It sounds like a discussion of politics. I don’t want to discuss politics here, but if you follow politics you know that base vs. general population is a common topic. Should Generic Democratic Politician do things which his base supporters, who are more liberal than the average person, will like, since they are more likely to give him money or go door-to-door for him and support him when things are tough? Or should he do things that are more middle-of-the road to pick up the support of moderates, who are more numerous but whose support cannot be counted on? What is the best balance?
I think Dana White has the same problem. I am part of the UFC’s base. I actually like MMA. I want to watch MMA, and although I do not buy every PPV, I will buy PPVs that have good fighters even if they are not superstars. I also talk about MMA to everyone I know and try to explain why it’s great. I would be perfectly happy if TUF was canceled and fighters were promoted solely on skill without any attention to their charisma or personality.
But Dana also wants to attract more casual fans, who are not devoted to the sport, and to do that he needs things like TUF so that the fighters are more familiar to those casual fans and so that they can learn about the fighters’ personality and so on. For those fans he needs to do things that I am going to think are dumb or unfair or lame, and there are way more casual fans than there are people like me, but he can’t count on those casual fans to spend money and watch shows consistently.
I don’t know what the solution is, but this is a problem that is not unique to the UFC, or to MMA, or even to sports.
by Finian1 on Sep 28, 2010 12:38 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I know I wrote this comment in another post, but...
There’s an underlying irony to all this. The UFC has never been as big as it is now, yet the stars we talk about are the stars of yesterday. I’m not sure of all the figures but I believe we can all agree that the UFC is bigger now than it was in 2007, the last time Randy successfully defended a title or Chuck won a fight.
BJ has been relevant but he’s run into his fair share of troubles recently. Forrest did well against Tito but I’m not sure we can expect too much from him in the near future. Brock is great but is on the wrong side of 30. Anderson doesn’t draw.
They have an amazing crop of young talent, and yet people are still more interested in the guys they probably didn’t even watch in their heyday.
Yeah, I see what you mean.
As far as the details go, TUF is inefficient and the next crop of potential stars aren’t getting the sort of play we might hope for through promotional outlets.
I’m curious, though, if anybody else feels there may be something to be said…
1. for the marketing of the UFC vs. the marketing of individual fighters. Obviously this isn’t a counter to any argument about the lack of star power – we all know the names carry extra PPV numbers. However, I do wonder if the UFC name has been built up enough that, between the perceived legitimacy of its titleholders and the inevitable association with dynamic fights, the promotion could be safe even in a period of relative rebuilding.
2. about the evolution of the sport and its connection to this seeming lack of young talent. While it’s certain that the next crop of superstars will push the envelope, we’ve already seen the transition to the “true mixed martial artist” (or whatever term we may want to use when considering the evolution of the sport) made by fighters among those we’re now referring to as the old guard. Perhaps this has created some perceived need to slowly build the next crop of superstars. St. Pierre was fighting for a title in his third bout with the UFC and Penn was doing the same in his fourth bout if I’m not mistaken. Now of course this can’t be used to say “well look at how easily the superstars of today overcame the old guard…” because both lost in their first efforts. Currently though, having a a relatively inexperienced fighter who is new to the UFC competing for a title so quickly would seem to be imaginable only in weak divisions – Brock among the heavyweights is the most ready example, I suppose.
by Brent Ducharme on Sep 28, 2010 12:58 PM EDT reply actions
Couple things I should add...
Obviously I don’t mean to detract from the argument – these two points are external to it on some level, so more than anything I’m just hoping it offers some potential to sort of branch out discussion.
Also, in opening up my second point, I probably would have been better off saying “lack of promotional efforts behind young stars” rather than “seeming lack of young talent.” We all know the younger fighters have some serious talent, and I realized my wording may have conveyed the wrong message.
But word. Good shit.
by Brent Ducharme on Sep 28, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Hmm, I think most of the big stars we have now kinda made their own place and until the move on and new guys step up you won’t be able to clearly label all the next gen stars.
UFC can only do so much marketing wise with up and comers…this is not pro wrestling where you can decide who will do what. The fights decide that. And that is how the big names we have now got big. Unless you have other guys like Lesnar who come into it already with star power, I think we will have to see who carves out a niche for themselves over the next couple years.
We already have guys like Jon Jones making a name. Ryan Bader is doing well. A handful of guys from TUF have a shot to make something of themselves. But it will all depend on winning fights and winning championships. There will always be room for new stars as the old ones fade.
Jon Jones is not making a name. That’s the problem. His promotional push was given to the Court McGee’s of the world. That’s the issue I think.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 28, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions
But TUF is just one vehicle for making a star. Like you said, UFC needs to invest in more Primetime shows to hype their big fights. In fact, I think there need to be 4 Primetimes per year. In addition, there needs to be a hierarchy with regard to Fight Nights. I know that Spike loves TUF Alumni, but maybe you build a guy like Jon Jones or Phil Davis up by feeding him TUF guys that we know won’t make the cut. Personally, I think that Jones could probably use one more piece of the puzzle before he’s established as a star, be it a Primetime, another Versus main event, or a breakout showing on a PPV semi-main.
Jon Jones
Needs to fight Ryan Bader or Forrest Griffin immediately before the main event of a Lesnar or GSP title fight.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
As for being well rounded... "The fox devises many strategies, the hedgehog only one, but he uses it very effectively." -Archilochus
by BigDNotDallas on Sep 29, 2010 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions
His promotional path is different than TUF
but still exists. He’d headlined both main events for Versus on UFC. I’d argue that gives him a viable platform to be seen. He hasn’t taken the prelim/PPV route yet, like Ryan Bader, but casuals have had plenty of free chances to see him ply his trade.
"Walk not down that road, I cannot tell you where it goes. Ask me no more questions - some things you're not meant to know." - The Sword
to be honest
ur right snowden, i actually am in full agreement
but theres only so much caring i can do in the world, and im gonna continue to watch and care about UFC fights regardless of who is percieved as a star, i know who i like and i get excited about awesome matchups, not how much name recognition the fighter gets by casual fans
id love mma to explode as one of the major sports in the us and around the world but i just dont know if its possible the UFC is currently a marketable niche sport but to consider it beyond that is very very ignorant. go down the street and ask anyone to name 5 ufc fighters and id bet the vast majority couldnt do it
without a full espn promotional blitz UFC and mma will never go above what it is now, espn made chris moneymaker and countless other poker stars household names. if they could make a card game a huge fad, they could push UFC into the mainstream, without their help though the UFC will never grow above the post UFC 100 platue we’ve seen
We have a saying back home that if your coming on, COME ON!!!!
I think this thread and Kid Nate’s “Is the UFC Burning Out Its Pay Per View Fanbase?” have a ton of crossover talk potential as they both touch on the same thing really. Has the UFC done enough to promote new stars while also not burning out their existing fanbase with a glut of PPVs.
As many have already posted in KN’s thread, I think a great idea would be a less filled PPV schedule while introducing a new weekly / bi-weekly show that spotlights the lesser known talent that the company has signed. While I haven’t been the biggest fan of how Strikeforce has ran their Challenger series, that is exactly the type of show that the UFC needs atm. Add in the occasional interview, training segment, and whatever else to get people interested in the fighters. TUF has it’s place and I don’t think it needs to go away, but there is more than enough room for growth elsewhere.
The UFC really needs to become it’s own feeder organization at this point if they want to continue to see growth in years to come. Regional events have their place and always will, but when potentially talented fighters are coming out of them and walking into places like Strikeforce and Bellator instead of the UFC they are really wasting opportunities in creating new stars. Sure we can always end up seeing somebody like Daniel Cormier get signed by the UFC down the road once he has gone on a huge win streak, but that wastes tons of fights that the UFC could be using to make him a real star before he gets to the big show.
A perfect schedule for me right now would be something like this. 12 PPVs, 6 Fight Nights, and 12-24 ‘Contenders’ a year. I’m doubtful we will see anything like this anytime soon though as I think the UFC is stuck on the idea that a smaller roster works best.
by Empty Thoughts on Sep 28, 2010 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Is early 30’s really old? Not everyone is a Randy couture, I understand that but I think a lot of those guys still have a lot of fight left in them.
But I agree with the possible lack of star power that the UFC may have. A lot of up and coming fighters lack that Charisma that people have now. Lot of fighters come in to win, want that belt, so on and so on. There’s been a lot of decisions lately and the fans would rather see KOs and Subs then it going to the judges. Thats all from a fan’s perspective. Or at least a barnburner of a mtach between 2 equally matched competitiors.
Sonnen, Rampage, and even Koschek have a certain demeanor. A chracter that stands out amongst the other fighters. They have an attitude, they call out fighters, they’re the exception to the MMA fighter trying to win.
I think to being a star in the UFC or MMA in general is something to appeal to the fans. Not just being good but something to impress, something to entertain us, and I think a lot of the new fighters lack that fan appeal.
Bit early, harsh to label Nate Diaz a gatekeeper no?
I’d like to see where he is this time next year. Personally i think he’s one of the most talented guys around. What is the guy, 25? Give him a bit longer Jonathon!
Nate is talented but I think he is gonna suffer from the same problems as his brother. Namely I see him getting outmuscled and out wrestled his entire career. And his move in weight won’t help, because Fitch is stronger and nastier then Stevenson
Dear audio diary: Today I may have accidentally registered myself as a sex offender! WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY LIFE
- T-Rex
by sitnam90 on Sep 28, 2010 2:25 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Agreed
As talented and fun to watch as the Diaz brothers can be, their skillsets will never allow them to join the true elite. Maybe if Nick learned how to cut weight properly and dropped to 155, but even then he couldn’t hang with the top MMA wrestlers.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
As for being well rounded... "The fox devises many strategies, the hedgehog only one, but he uses it very effectively." -Archilochus
by BigDNotDallas on Sep 29, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions
How did Wanderlei become popular with the casual fan? I am always surprised at how well known and liked he is, yet he made his career strides in Pride.
A lot of Pride fans and I’m assuming his guts out war with Chuck Liddell. He brings pressure and is vicious. Not as vicious as he once was but I guess we’ll see whenever he fights next. Plus, he loves the fans. Don Frye has a short story about how he was ready to take out Wanderlei in a parking lot til he approached him and was offered a piece of gum. Said he was one of the nicest guys around.
They have the tools, they're just not using them right
TUF has proven that it can draw viewers and that people are aware of its existence. What, almost five million people saw the first couple of episodes with Kimbo Slice? So it’s not that people aren’t aware of TUF it’s that nobody gives a crap anymore because there’s almost nobody worth watching.
The format after 12 seasons is incredibly trite and dull. Bunch of dudes in a house. They train. They drink. They talk shit. Maybe ejaculate on someone’s food. All for at least a half hour before a fight happens. At worst, the show goes on like this for 50 minutes and then the fight is over in about 50 seconds.
I really feel that they should be using more of their name fighters on the show and should consider making TUF into standalone one hour episodes. If you have a boring coach (Dan Henderson) or someone that the majority of fight fans strongly dislike (Michael Bisping) and you’re not just stuck with them but with sixteen other fighters nobody gives a shit about for four months, people will leave in droves.
I have no real suggestions aside from the standalone idea, but if the episode sucks one week then at least we wouldn’t have to switch off for an entire season. There should be more fighting with a mix of recognizable names and less banter, petty squabbling and – most importantly – using the show to hype a fight that won’t happen until six months after the show finishes filming (that may not even happen for one reason or another – see Hughes/Serra).
My $0.02.
Get rid of the ramp!
The list of todays big stars
is a list of current and former champions.
Ten years from now the list of big stars will be…….. wait for it…….
a list of current and former champions
It’s funny that nobody mentioned the missing ingredient to making a superstar: The sponsor
The truth is, the promotion, like a sports league, can’t do it all. What puts a professional athlete over the top is appearing in a commercial. Urijah Faber outshines everyone in the WEC because for years he’s been featured in TV commercials, and generally treated like a big deal. Same goes for Chuck Liddell. And now we see it with GSP, who is an icon in Canada, but gets UnderArmour and Gatorade exposure.
I can guarantee you, that if Jon Jones became part of a regular Nike campaign, one which showed his face, his name, and demonstrated that he was an MMA fighter, his star would shine brighter. If Roy Nelson actually got that Burger King sponsorship he was angling for, he too would be seen as a big deal. If Bud Light found a way to put Frankie “The Answer” Edgar, and Mike “The Situation” Sorrentino in a spot together, people would want to see him fight, regardless of his Mayweather-esque fighting style.
Part of what makes you a star is that you have to be treated as such. You have to make yourself bigger than (or at least coequal with) the brand. As long as you don’t outshine the brand, you’ll never be a star. That’s where sponsors come into play. UFC should be actively encouraging its athletes to pursue outside sponsorships and promote their outside ventures, like movies or TV appearances, instead of those things always being viewed as sources of contentiousness.
It is obvious that the UFC is trying to build new stars, but it just isn’t happening. There is a reason that Ryan Bader was on the co-main event of UFC 119 and Jon Jones is headlining UFC on Versus cards, and that is because the UFC wants to build them up, but I don’t know if that approach is working as far as making these two into PPV draws. Fighters like Dunham, Sotiropolous, Hathaway, etc are being brought up, but they are still relatively unknown to the casual fanbase.
If a quick solution was there, then I would assume that the UFC would jump at it. I personally believe that while ideas are out there, there is no easy solution to this.
The questions that have to be asked is how Chuck Liddell, Randy Couture, etc became PPV draws. One thing that I noticed with someone like Liddell, Wanderlei and whatnot is that it took time and highlight reel finishes and memorable fights for them to eventually become PPV draws. Have Ryan Bader or Jon Jones had that one fight or moment that really made them stars: no they haven’t. Rashad Evans KOs Chuck Liddell with Liddell’s own move, he wins the TItle in his next fight, and everyone starts to know who Rashad Evans is. On the contrary, Gabriel Gonzaga KOs CroCop with his own move but loses his next fight, and now Gonzaga is in gatekeeper purgatory. This just shows how hard it is to make new stars.
The UFC has most of the top ten fighters in their respected divisions. In almost all those divisions, not even fighters in the top five are what could be considered PPV draws. Obviously, that falls on the fighter himself and the UFC to make them into stars. While Jon Fitch is the second best Welterweight in the world, he isn’t drawing a dime, and that goes for many fighters.
Rich Franklin consistently headlines PPVs, but the thing is that there are many fighters in his weight division (light heavyweight even though he fights at Franklinweight 195 many times) that are better than him, yet these fighters aren’t headlining PPVs. The same goes for Frank Mir and Mirko CroCop.
Check out MMA For You at http://www.youtube.com/user/Gobusiness123 for MMA reviews, predictions, and analysis.
To be fair, though, UFC hasn’t done a DAMN THING to promote Jon Fitch. If they had decided to do a TUF: USA vs. Brazil season instead of Tito vs. Chuck, they could have built up a Thiago Alves vs. Jon Fitch rematch as title eliminator while simultaneously giving these guys the spotlight to show their personalities. Both of these guys could be bigger stars if allowed more insight to show their human sides, but as long as they are only seen as “guys who lost to GSP,” casual fans won’t be given a reason to care about them.
While I agree with you, I do feel that these two haven’t done much to build themselves up either. Josh Koscheck, someone that Alves destroyed and lower-ranked than Fitch, is quickly becoming a PPV draw in no small part due to him building himself up and using his mouth/charisma to get MMA fans to care about his fights. Alves had that moment when he flying knee’d UFC Hall of Famer Matt Hughes to a KO/TKO, but Alves really doesn’t have that charisma to really get MMA fans behind him. The UFC did screw up with Fitch though especially when he got more fans to like him after he got demolished by GSP but showed heart and a never-say-die attitude, and then the UFC goes and puts Fitch’s next fight against Gono on the prelims. There was potential to build Fitch as the first fighter to go five rounds with GSP, showing the heart and fortitude of a lion, and building his second Title chase. I don’t know if that would sell, but there was no effort at all to even mention Fitch after his fight against GSP despite Fitch gaining more fans. While Fitch is labeled as a ‘boring’ fighter, one has to remember that the biggest names are not always the most fun to watch such as some of (not all) of Floyd Mayweather Jr’s fights, some (not all) of Tito Ortiz’s fights, etc.
Check out MMA For You at http://www.youtube.com/user/Gobusiness123 for MMA reviews, predictions, and analysis.
Josh Koscheck is a TUF guy, though. They had already put a lot of time and money into promoting him; he just capitalized on the opportunity, and rolled with the fact that people didn’t like him.
And I think that Thiago Alves is pretty marketable, but he was overshadowed in the buildup to UFC 100 by the Mir-Lesnar rematch. Plus, remember that the whole video game fiasco followed Fitch’s loss to GSP. Dana was willing to let Jon go to Strikeforce, so it follows that the promotion would underplay Fitch’s position as the #2 welterweight in the world.
I think Zuffa is trying to promote Jon Jones. I mean, three free card headliners in a row. Not trying to their best ability ming you, but I see them making an effort with Bones.
But guys like Phil Davis, Johnny Hendricks, Charles Olivera, etc haven’t gotten alotta attention. And many of these prospects seem marketable. Exciting highlight reels and the ufc hype train are still helping Brandon Vera remain recognizable despite his last few performances.
I think the free shopws on spike and versus are great advertising vehicles for showcasing new fighters. The last UFN was pretty good IMO and showcased some good prospects (Olivera) and contenders (Miller, Mardquart). But Zuffa just doesn’t advertise these shows enough to make people care to watch
Dear audio diary: Today I may have accidentally registered myself as a sex offender! WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY LIFE
- T-Rex
by sitnam90 on Sep 28, 2010 3:14 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I think that the UFC is missing the boat with certain fighters...
Guys like Cain, Diego Sanchez and Miguel Torres (and Efrain, Huerta till they got canned) have the potential to be national icons in to Mexican-Americans the likes of De La Hoya and Vargas were in Boxing.
Jon Jones, Phil Davis, Nate Marquardt, Frankie Edgar, Dan Hardy, Josh Koscheck, Junior Dos Santos, Pat Berry, Shogun Rua… All these guys are phenominal fighters, but just need the right marketing to improve their popularity.
I think UFC Primetime is a great way to introduce fans to new fighters, who are on the verge of breaking out.
There are a lot of different aspects to this problem, but I think one of the important ones is the ongoing expansion of the free agent market, and how that has kept some of the best star candidates out of their grasp.
From 2006-2008, they exponentially increased the size of their roster, and created a new class of stars by importing top PRIDE fighters (Anderson, CroCop, Rampage, Nogueira, Wanderlei, Shogun, Hendo) while slowly integrating the TUF standouts (Griffin, Sanchez, Evans, Stevenson, Bisping) into the picture as well.
As the market expanded, particularly in the US with the additions of Bellator FC and Strikeforce as televised brands, free agent names became harder to come by, and UFC went from taking their pick of PRIDE stars to salvaging ex-IFL and Affliction stars like Roy Nelson and Ben Rothwell, while grabbing the B-level PRIDE names left over like Denis Kang and Rogerio Nogueira.
Now the competition for free agents is a war of attrition, with Strikeforce and UFC going tit-for-tat over mid level names like Henderson and Jake Shields, while Bellator tries to pick up top prospects before anyone else can get to them. I think UFC fully expected to have marketable fighters like Fedor Emelianenko, Alistair Overeem, King Mo, Gegard Mousasi, Nick Diaz, Gilbert Melendez, Eddie Alvarez, Hector Lombard, etc. by now. But the way the market has changed means they can no longer rely on a steady stream of new names who can jump in at the top level and carry the ball for them.
Part of Frankie's problem...
is that BJ doesn’t lend any credibility to other fighters when he loses because he has a reputation for being a headcase. If Frankie successfully defends against Maynard, he’ll start to have name recognition.
Another problem was he had next to no exposure/hype before the fight. MMA vets were pooh-poohing his chances and MMA noobs didn’t know who he was. Give it time, Edgar’s second fight with BJ was a great one, with time his reputation could grow. GSP was a below-average draw back when he started, but now people recognize that he has earned his position by merit. People don’t know but people WILL know.
This is a constant problem for all combat sports
Boxing had arguably the most important sporting event of the century (Rumble in the Jungle) and a generation later no one even knows who the heavyweight champ is. It’s just not like team sports where you can follow a team for years and years, regardless of who’s playing on it.
"There's this image that you have, this interior image of something that's absolutely perfect, and that's your signpost, your guide. And you'll never get there. But without it you'll never get anywhere."
Part of the problem (tho certainly not the whole problem)
is that the UFC tends to support guys with zero personality or who toe the company line.
Mir, Penn, Koscheck, Rampage, love em or hate em, at least have personality or well crafted images that can sell. They also have fan friendly fight styles to add (tho each has been involved in a boring fight or two). But Dana White prefers to call them selfish, not team players, or dicks them over. And thats just in front of the cameras, I’m sure he doesn’t support them much in getting them out in front of the public.
I am much more interested in guys like them than in guys like GSP or Rashad, whose trash talking seems forced, and who don’t put on many fan friendly fights.
"Deserve's got nothing to do with it." -Will Munny, a known thief and murderer, a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition.
UFC needs to make TUF worth it for these stars like Cain Velasquez, Shane Carwin, Jon Jones, Phil Davis, Johny Hendricks, Evan Dunham. Take a cue from Bellator and give the winner $100K for winning the show, and a 6 fight contract starting at $20K/$20k and going to $30K/30$. Super talented guys are not interested in TUF because they by the time they fight that “6 figure” 9 fight contract out, they could reasonable be on their 3rd, contract with Zuffa making at least $50K/50K a fight.
The talent is there the marketing just needs to catch up right now.
As long as Dana White is the face on ESPN, CNBC, or whatever other media push the promotion gets, it will not grow.
Part of the UFC’s problem is that, besides around the time of a fight, you never see their “stars” come out. Liddell, Couture, Ortiz, and the rest of the old were built at least in part without Zuffa, and had established brands and personalities before the promotion was the major face. The new guys don’t really have that, save for GSP and Lesnar (who was a transplanted star), but even then, you don’t see them pushing St. Pierre or Lesnar for TV appearances or commercials during off time. That might not be Zuffa’s responsibility, but if they ever want to get over the slightly above 1 million buy plateau they’ve hit, they will have to get people to actually know their athletes.
The problem with making the promotion and its president the star rather than the fighters is that nobody really gives a shit in the end. You don’t see these guys except in previews from prior PPVs, reality tv spots, and trailers. In the age of American nano-second attention spans, that is not good enough. White is a refreshing, engaging figure for all of 2 or 3 appearances before the act gets old. He’s not the one in the ring/cage, so why should people really pay attention? The NFL doesn’t make money because those three letters mean so much, but because fans identify so heavily with the athletes and teams that represent their city, athletes they have followed since the NCAA when they were part of major collegiate programs. Maybe the college players don’t always pan out, but people are paying attention very early on.
by sBruce24 on Sep 29, 2010 5:04 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs

by 


















