Can a Fighter Who Isn't in the UFC Be the World's Best?
When Frankie Edgar upset BJ Penn, not once but twice, it was a real paradigm shift in the way many fans view the sport's lightweight division. We had collectively anointed Penn the best fighter in the world at 155 pounds and assumed he was unbeatable in that division. For whatever reason, despite the two wins, Edgar doesn't command that same level of respect.
The whispers have begun, and many are suggesting that the best fighters in the class don't compete in the UFC Octagon. Bellator President Bjorn Rebney told the MMA Torch he believes the best lightweight on the planet competes on Fox Sports:
RICH HANSEN: There has been a lot of talk about Eddie Alvarez and Gilbert Melendez. Do you have anything you can tell us about this fight, maybe next year sometime?
BJORN REBNEY: You know, I keep calling Scott Coker and pressing the issues like crazy. I never like to assume I can get inside people’s heads. I think Eddie Alvarez is the best 155 pounder in the world. I mean, everybody can debate it, but he’ll never get the chance to fight Frankie [Edgar] or B.J. [Penn] or Kenny [Florian].
RH: But he could fight Gilbert.
BR: Right. So I call on a weekly basis. I’m starting to feel like that guy from Swingers making the returning phone call all night. I think they (Strikeforce) are not as enthusiastic about it as I am. I’ve got a lot of respect for Gilbert. Gilbert started this talk by calling out Eddie. Gilbert wants it, he’s got a huge heart. Eddie wants it. Of course, I want it. And I don’t know if that’s a fight they would take. Gilbert is one of their bigger stars right now, and a loss to Eddie Alvarez wouldn’t be the best thing for him right now.
Right now, looking at the Bloody Elbow/USA Today rankings, four of the top 10 and seven of the top 20 lightweights compete outside of the UFC. Is it fair then, when determining who the top fighters in the division are, to limit our consideration to a select group of UFC stars? Would you favor Edgar, the current UFC champion, over Melendez? Opinions will vary, but it certainly isn't as clear cut as it would be in almost every other weight class. If Rebney is able to put together this match it could certainly help make a pretty strong case that the winner is the best fighter in the division.
192 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If beating B.J. Penn twice doesn’t get you that #1 distinction I don’t know how any of Alvarez’s or Melendez’s wins can put them at #1.
by Jamie Penick on Sep 17, 2010 9:44 AM EDT reply actions 4 recs
Is that kind of calculus the best way to determine the sport’s best? Of course those guys don’t have Penn on their list of wins – the UFC would never allow those fights to happen.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, as time passes, the impact of those two wins will have less impact on Edgar’s standing atop the (mythical) LW rankings. He’ll either build his own legacy atop the division, or he won’t. And if he does string together a few defenses of his title, then he won’t have to lean on the BJ wins so much for his standing in the division.
www.mmatorch.com
Have you checked out the rest of Edgar's record.
Not too shabby…
I like Fedor, it’s just his fans that are intolerable...and his management.
This is the same reason the CFL champion will never be considered "world champ"
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions
That would make sense if the CFL and the NFL competed over talent. Clearly the proper analogy is the old AFL.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions
The AFL had to earn respect by beating the NFL. They were consistently disrespected until they proved it on the field. A failure to do so would have been taken as an implicit admission that they knew they couldn’t hack it.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions
You are being silly here. It makes no sense to compare Strikeforce or “other” MMA to the CFL. The CFL didn’t sign Tom Brady, Julius Peppers, or draft Adrian Peterson.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions
If the CFL signed Tom Brady, the entirety of football’s fan base in America would write him off.
Hey, kind of like some of us did with Fedor!
“Draft”? Who’s being silly here? Who are these other ROY and defensive POYs that Strikeforce has on roster? (Say Diaz and I’ll hurt myself laughing)
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m talking about MMA generally here. Many of the top young fighters in the world are competing outside the UFC. Guys like Askren – the CFL doesn’t have young players of that caliber.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
They’re more akin to college at this point – though they play by significantly different rules on a different field.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
The comparison you guys should be using the the USFL from the early 80’s, who for various periods of time, had Herschel Walker, Steve Young, Reggie White, Doug Flutie, Jim Kelly, and others
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Sep 17, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
The USFL was similar to the old AFL, just with no eventual merger…so I agree with you.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
How did the USFL end up?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
So, how about USFL?
"People ask, 'Why Baltimore?', and I’m like, 'Why not? What am I missing?'" - Buck Showalter
So, how about I read the entire thread before I post?
"People ask, 'Why Baltimore?', and I’m like, 'Why not? What am I missing?'" - Buck Showalter
So does that make Gilbert Melendez Joe Namath?
www.mmatorch.com
by Rich Hansen on Sep 17, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Scott Coker is Al Davis
"Now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb."
by menckenstein on Sep 17, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't like Coker
But that’s a low blow.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm talking in terms of your timeline
It’s not an insult, the man was the AFL commissioner.
"Now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb."
by menckenstein on Sep 17, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions
I think it is a massive compliment, one Coker probably does not deserve.
Davis was a visionary in those early days and literally ran roughshod over both the AFL and NFL front offices while at the same time crafting a dominant team on the field. Davis may have been giant jackass, but he was a brilliant jackass until he lost touch with the economic and competitive realities of the sport back in the 1990s.
I know Al Davis, and you Mr Coker, are no Al Davis
by Steve4192 on Sep 17, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Coker is a behind the scenes guy
He’s no Dana. Coker does his work trying to build up his promotion and support the growth of MMA. People have no reason to dislike the guy. He’s a true MMA fan trying to do whats best for his company and the sport.
Strikeforce's biggest issue
Is they don’t even attempt to control the narrative about their company. What’s going on in their HW division? Who knows, but periodic updates from them would go a long way. Instead they pretty much do a media blackout until 2 weeks before their next card, and then as soon as that card is over they’re back away from the media again.
If Coker doesn’t want to be the PR man, that’s fine, have someone else who will. But right now they basically leave the fans and the internet to speculate at what they’re doing, and from an outside perspective, it looks like they’re just running around like a monkey fucking a coconut.
You can pretty much tell what everyone in UFC’s HW division is doing…they either just fought, or you know what their next fight is going to be. On the flipside, nobody knows what ANY fighter in Strikeforce is going to do next, if they fight at all.
Rec’d. Al Davis may be the devil, but you have to respect what he’s done.
Bolts from the Blue // "It is what it is." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "Richard is a jewel." - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Sep 17, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions
If he beats a top three UFC lightweight, sure
But not before then.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions
The USFL then.
Bolts from the Blue // "It is what it is." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "Richard is a jewel." - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Sep 17, 2010 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s like Frankie Edgar in the first fight is Boise St and BJ Penn is Va Tech. and then in the second fight Frankie is James Madison and BJ is Still VA Tech.
Somehow, in public perception, because Frankie Edgard isn’t some scary monster, his 2 victories over BJ Penn devauled BJ Penn and therefore devalued Frankie Edgar. Dude just can’t get a break. It’s like he JMU’d himself, which isn’t fair
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Sep 17, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Styles make fights guys that's all it is.
BJ lost to Frankie cause his boxing wasn’t as good. Gray will beat Frankie again cause his wrestling is better. Melendez I think would beat Gray cause he’ll force him to stand while BJ would beat Gray and Melendez cause his stand up is better than both of them.
Drink to remember, drink to forget.
by doonerthesooner on Sep 17, 2010 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Pure assumptions.
- - - - -
VEe is ANIMated!
by VeeisAnimated on Sep 17, 2010 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions
Maynard’s boxing is not as bad as most seen to think IMO, but I am no expert on striking. I’m very interested to see Edgar’s gameplan for the much larger (and equal or superior mma wrestler) Maynard. I haven’t reviewed their previous fights lately, but if memory serves I suspect Maynard will beat Edgar and be the new LW champ, and stay there for a while.
Neither BJ nor Melendez would be able to keep Maynard from taking them down, and neither is a real threat to submit him (or much of anyone legit) off their back these days.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
As for being well rounded... "The fox devises many strategies, the hedgehog only one, but he uses it very effectively." -Archilochus
by BigDNotDallas on Sep 17, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
He was scared to take Nate down, and I think BJ would work something if he stayed on the ground long enough
Drink to remember, drink to forget.
by doonerthesooner on Sep 17, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions
The problem with fighting BJ Penn is that if you beat him, it’s because BJ was not in shape or off that night – not because you were better.
BJ already has a big legacy, Frankie’s still building his.
by MMABookworm on Sep 17, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
There's a difference between ranking and who you think would win
I, for example, think JDS and Overeem would beat Lesnar easily, but even I can’t rank them higher because JDS doesn’t have as good wins yet, and Overeem hasn’t beat anyone other than a one dimensional Rogers.
So saying someone is the best doesn’t mean that they should be ranked #1. Right now everyone thinks they can beat Frankie because he’s so damn small compared to mammoths like Tibau.
I don’t know if I agree that Melendez and Alvarez are better than the UFC lightweights, but there is definitely something to be said about an organization that is willing to put their belt’s legitimacy on the line by having their champs fight guys that are under other banners. If this fight happens, MMA sites really have to put the winner at #2 at least. There’s a reason that UFC HW champ wasn’t #1 back when Couture/Sylvia had the belt, despite the UFC clearly having the best fighters in the world overall.
That's fair
I could see Melendez at #2. Hell, I had Shields #2 well before he signed with the UFC, and I hate everything.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
If maynard beats Edgar, is Maynard number 1?
/sarcasm
SCM aka Black Lesnar aka Wesley Types aka Slap ya Favorite MMA Writer
Follow me on Twitter
Read me at WatchKalibRun
by S.C. Michaelson on Sep 17, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I think so.
If Edgar wins he is the unquestionable number one though.
If Maynard wins, then doesn’t defend AND Melendez beats Alvarez things could get hairy though.
I did a lineal....
…track from the time Pulver beat Penn, leaving the UFC and coming back and Maynard is already the lineal champ. Crazy huh?
Absolutely.
Bolts from the Blue // "It is what it is." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "Richard is a jewel." - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Sep 17, 2010 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I understand that, but is ranking based off what could possibly happen the best way to go? Just because Melendez and Alvarez have looked great outside of the UFC doesn’t necessarily mean they’d rip through the top four or five guys in the UFC, and the same can be said four those four or five against these two. But the fact that they haven’t had a chance to fight Penn doesn’t change the fact that Frankie beat him. Twice. And a former Champion in Sean Sherk who had previously been beaten by Penn and two welterweights. Results should count for something.
reply fail
Was responding to Jonathan, of course.
by Jamie Penick on Sep 17, 2010 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions
The problem is that Penn’s reputation was built on a house of cards. Starting with Sherk, who was kind of given the 155 pound title without having competed in the division, you can make a case that his competition wasn’t necessarily the best fighters in the weight class.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions
“kind of given” = “beat Kenny Florian”
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Ken Florian 2006 < Ken Florian, 2010
www.mmatorch.com
by Rich Hansen on Sep 17, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Sure
But that’s a lot different than being “kind of given” a title that you won. However, diminishing BJ can’t be done without diminishing everyone he ever tooled.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions
It was a guy with one lightweight win in the UFC against a guy with no lightweight wins in the UFC. For a WORLD TITLE! That’s a gift.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Or it was two really, really good former 170ers. Opinions!
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Florian didn’t really have an impressive run at 170 either. You diminish yourself by arguing that wasn’t a bizarre fight to crown a champion at 155.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think it was “bizarre”. They were re-establishing a division that didn’t have much talent back yet, and they wanted to have a champion without going through a tourney or whatever. At the time, who else should have got the shot?
http://www.instrength.com
Probably some guys who had fought at 155 successfully? Even if you give Sherk a pass based on WW accomplishments, Florian wasn’t the answer. He got put in the spot based on how well Griffin did at the box office. Florian never quite caught on the same way.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Who? None of them were in the UFC. The division didn’t exist at the time. They wanted guys who had a history with the promotion, you can’t fault them for that. I agree that Florian wasn’t the best choice – hell, he was 2-2 in his last 4 before that at WW – but I’m not sure there was anyone else that was in the UFC at the time that could have filled the spot any better.
Yves would probably have been the answer, but he had lost to Hominick earlier in the year (who in turn lost to Hioki in TKO a bit after that).
http://www.instrength.com
Limiting it to guys in the promotion at the time makes no sense. Why not wait until you sign some talent in the division? Why not organize a tournament? Why bring in a title that would immediately have a credibility problem?
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
It makes sense in that it was, and is, their business model. When you refuse to co-promote, you have to give a little, take a little… let your poor heart break a little…
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Who said anything about co promotion? Not that it would have been unthinkable for Zuffa.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 11:38 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
How else do you include non-company fighters?
I don’t blame them for not setting fire to the model that got them where they are.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
MMA was still pretty fractured at the time. Co-promotion wasn’t even necessary. They could have easily brought in a top-flight guy to fight Sherk. It’s just that he likely would have been Japanese and not been a draw in the UFC at all.
http://www.instrength.com
That was back when a Japanese fighter could make money in Japan – I doubt the economics were there. Either way, not a gift.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Not even Kenny Florian believes he should have been fighting for a title. Not even Joe Silva would argue this was good matchmaking.
But there’s always Subo!
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 11:48 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You called it a "kind of gift" for Sherk
That’s not true. You can call it bad matchmaking, but it wasn’t a gift.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m not getting where you are coming from. I don’t think Florian’s own mother would have picked him in that fight. That belt might as well have been presented on a platter to Sherk. It would be like Brendan Schaub cutting down and fighting Shane Carwin for the light heavyweight title. Total nonsense.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
“Kenny finishes fights! He will beat Sean Sherk and drink unopened energy drinks!!” – Mrs. Florian
His mom thought he would win.
I have no idea what you’re talking about with Schaub/Carwin though. That’s…not even close to the same thing. LHW is established.
http://www.instrength.com
If the title was vacated and all the fighters went down in a single tragic plane crash. Carwin and
Schaub are the heavyweight equivalents of Sherk and Florian at the time. Work with me.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I’d work with you if you picked a HW that had a remote possibility of making 205. : ) Cain/Schaub? Better?
http://www.instrength.com
Carwin just reminds me of Sherk. I wonder why? :)
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
It's like having Benavidez fight Antonio Banuelos
for the WEC Flyweight belt.
Are we getting closer?
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Sherk at least had a history with the promotion and credibility. He had fought for the WW title and was coming off a win over Nick Diaz (who, admittedly, had lost 2 in a row prior to his loss to Sherk). Still, he had more cred than anyone else they could have put into the spot that was in the UFC at the time.
http://www.instrength.com
I believe they said they had no interest in a tournament. They never have. And they wanted a champion to build the division around instead of having meaningless fights in the division like they did before they shut er’ down the last time. I don’t really blame them for that, nor do I blame them for not bringing in an unknown (at least to UFC fans) to fight Sherk.
Besides, all the real top fighters in the division were in Japan. At the time, I think Hominick was the highest rated guy in North America.
http://www.instrength.com
except the tournament they run twice a year on their reality show
oh yeah and the mini-tournament they did in the heavyweight division to unify the interim and real titles.
yeah they hate tournaments except when they don’t.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Nate Wilcox on Sep 17, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Credibility problem?
Not a single person thought Sherk wasn’t legitimately a top fighter at 155 pounds. He was always widely considered to be a LW who was fighting at WW because UFC had no LW division. It’s easy to diminish Sherk now because he’s fallen off a bit, but seriously, you’re grasping at straws hard here.
To break it down in convenient bullet points:
- Sherk was always considered a top guy in WW that was too small
- Coming off of having no lightweight division, there wasn’t a huge amount of in house talent
- It’s easier said than done to just magically convert a bunch of the PRIDE stars to UFC fighters
- What makes you think UFC would have ever done a tournament?
- Your hate of MMA post 2005 is kind of funny
Oh, I forgot
The guy widely considered the “Uncrowned Lightweight Champion” of the UFC (Yves Edwards) came back and lost to Mark Hominick, otherwise odds are he would have been fighting for the title as soon as it came back.
What's the deal man
This is the second time I’ve seen you conveniently forget the time period when UFC had no lightweight division. I know you know the events that happened during that time, why are you conveniently forgetting them for the sake of arguing in comments posts?
You know the point he’s making. He didn’t need to fight 5 times at LW for a title shot or whatever, they handpicked what they thought were the 2 best guys there at the time and they fought for the title.
I don’t agree that somehow BJ’s diminished by the fact that Sherk was handed the title though. Sean Sherk proved his worth before and since, and BJ demolishing him was very impressive.
http://www.instrength.com
I can’t really agree Sherk ever proved his worth at LW. He lost to Penn and Edgar and got busted for roids against Franca. He hardly bathed in glory….
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions
I never said he proved his worth at LW. I meant that he proved his worth as a top fighter by beating Benji Radach, Nick Diaz, KenFlo (albeit a young one) and Tyson Griffin. I’d never make the case that Sherk was every a top 3 LW, but no one, not even GSP or Hughes, dominated him like BJ did.
http://www.instrength.com
"He lost to Penn and Edgar"
Most lightweights do
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Its not like Kenny Florian was a top 5 lightweight in 2006. Or even a top 10 lightweight.
by VirtualBalboa on Sep 17, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
He had one fight at LW, choking out Sam Stout. He turned out to be pretty good.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Beating Sam Stout doesn’t make you a top 25 lightweight in 2010. Forget 2006.
by VirtualBalboa on Sep 17, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
“UFC LW in 2006” is meaningless. That’s not really how the sport worked. It was a bad fight. No sense in making it worse by pretending it was for a legitimate title.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 2:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
How did it work?
The UFC was supposed to what, declare Gomi their champion and mail him a belt?
Outside of your world of fairies and dreams where the UFC was apparently supposed to not bother having a LW division until all the guys from PRIDE decided to move over, they put in guys who were legitimate contenders.
The funniest part of your argument is that you’re arguing that it’s perfectly OK for modern non-UFC orgs to have their guys fight VERY low ranked opponents and still be considered #1, but when UFC does has guys who are top 10-20 fighting it’s not “legitimate”
Of Eddie Alvarez’ last 5 opponents, only 2 of them are even ranked top 50 (!!) and both of those two are on the wrong side of the top 25. But somehow this qualifies him as a legitimate #1 contender?
You can’t just apply your own rules when you want to make UFC look bad and then ignore them when it comes to non-UFC orgs. I read your book, I get that you really really hate the Zuffa era UFC, but c’mon man. At least try to have an argument that’s consistent.
The funniest part of your argument is that you’re arguing that it’s perfectly OK for modern non-UFC orgs to have their guys fight VERY low ranked opponents and still be considered #1
I don’t even take a side here. Not sure what “argument” you read.
I read your book, I get that you really really hate the Zuffa era UFC, but c’mon man
Wait, you read my book and think I hate the Zuffa era UFC? Wow. You think I am watching this stuff today, nine years after the fact, have covered more than a dozen live UFCs and wrote two books about something I hate?
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions
That is the way you come across alot of the time.
I’m surprised you’re surprised to hear it.
I like Fedor, it’s just his fans that are intolerable...and his management.
Only to the kind of person who believes any criticism is grounded in “hate.” The idea that any of us would do this if we hated the UFC is bizarre.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice straw man
I argue that you just don’t want them where they are (let ALONE where they’re going), not that you “hate” them.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 18, 2010 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Do you even know what a “strawman” argument is?
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 18, 2010 10:41 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
They bought PRIDE and were in the process of forcing them into sitting on their asses until those contracts ran out while offering them significantly less money. Who’s fault is that? The fighters for not taking small money? Interesting. The UFC created a paper belt and basically gave it to Sherk with a lousy fight. Argue that however you want to. I guess you don’t give a crap about the quality of fights so long as the UFC tells you its good? No wonder you are confused about people who “hate” them.
by VirtualBalboa on Sep 18, 2010 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions
You can't deny Penn's legitimacy as the best LW in the world when he had the belt
Sherk and especially Diego Sanchez had a lot of success in the UFC WW division, which is indisputably loaded with the best talent in the world. Penn destroyed them.
We’ll get a better idea of how good Sherk really is after he fights Dunham, but he was booted from the top 10 after losing as a big favorite against Edgar. Nobody knew how good Edgar was at the time.
Sherk might have shot knees by now – if he never is what he was, that doesn’t diminish how menacing he used to be.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Even if Sherk was "given" a gift at LW he still
1) had a 32 -2 – 1 record with over 20 stoppages
2) a former lightweight title contender
3) only defeated by two HOF fighters and the best two WW’s ever
4) faired very well against quality opponents despite fighting out of his natural weight class
He was a very legitimate opponent.
Legitimate opponent or not, he had never fought at LW before. And his vacant title bout was against a guy who at that point was not a top lightweight contender by anyone’s measure. There’s a reason Sherk was never considered top lightweight in the world while UFC lightweight champion.
by VirtualBalboa on Sep 17, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
King Mo said it best . . .
The best of the best is all marketing. Anybody can get it on any given Sunday. If some one shouts something long enough, eventually some people will believe it or at least consider it.
This post gets a ’rec for simply asking the question. I feel that many of the rankings are . . . of course . . . biased towards all things UFC. Brock Lesnar the #1 or #2 heavyweight in MMA. OK, yeah, we are all entitled to our opinion. Whatever.
BJ Penn is this, that, the other and the third. There’s absolutely no way Edgar can beat him. After Abu Dhabi, it was a fluke. Whatever.
Snowden you’re absolutely correct, Edgar doesn’t command that respect at all and Gray Maynard is more or less ignored. Really?
“Vitor Belfort? I beat that guy 2-3 years ago.” Belfort is currently considered a top ranked MW fighter? Yeah. Meanwhile Jake Shields was never really considered anything close to GSP. yeah whatever. We are all entitled to our opinion.
- - - - -
VEe is ANIMated!
"Vitor Belfort? I beat that guy 2-3 years ago."
-Dan Henderson reply to Fertita and Dan White while he was negotiating his UFC contract and trying to get a rematch with the current MW champion of the UFC.
- - - - -
VEe is ANIMated!
by VeeisAnimated on Sep 17, 2010 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
If Alvarez beats Huerta it will help shape things up.
Drink to remember, drink to forget.
by doonerthesooner on Sep 17, 2010 9:58 AM EDT reply actions
If melendez beats alvarez and edgar beats maynard, it will become enough of a clusterfuck at the top to have a discussion.
I think melendez needs another big victory to truly enter the discussion for the number 1 spot, but Gray Maynard with 2 wins over Edgar plus Florian (and even huerta factors in) will put him clearly on the top.
Called it!
The answer to the title, of course, is “no”. The best win Eddie Alvarez has in the last two wins is Josh Neer and the Aoki/Kawajiri/Hansen triangle just ain’t what it used to be. Gilbert will have to beat someone above him (Frankie and Gray at the very least) to take their spot.
Gray Maynard will be undefeated and 2-0 against a man that’s 2-0 against BJ Penn if he wins that fight. Haters.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:05 AM EDT reply actions
If Alvarez beat Melendez (or vice versa) and Edgar loses to Maynard.
I would be comfortable with either guy at number one. I think I would still rank the Edgar / Maynard winner in the top spot though.
If Maynard wins, we are talking about an undefeated fighter (11 – 0) with two wins over Edgar and a win over Florian. Wins over Diaz, Huerta and Miller are also solid.
If Edgar defends, we are talking about a fighter who is 14 – 1 and has avenged his only career loss. Career wins over Penn x 2, Sherk, Maynard are very impressive. Wins over Miller and Griffin are solid too.
Meanwhile, if Alvarez beats Melendez, then Alvarez has… beaten Melendez.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think so. Alvarez got his ranking because of the disaster at the end of the Dream LW GP. But after that he lost to aoki, and has now put together a run against less than stellar opposition. Alvarez beating Melendez means the number 1 is in the UFC.
Edgar or Maynard will have a much better recent record than Alvarez.
This is the problem
“Gilbert will have to beat someone above him (Frankie and Gray at the very least) to take their spot.”
Lets say someone ranked Sylvia and Couture above Fedor in 2007, because they fought in the UFC. He could say Fedor has to beat Sylvia or Couture to take their spot, and if Sylvia never left he wouldn’t have. It’s a self-fulfilling ranking system you have that’s completely meaningless.
I say if Alvarez-Melendez happens, it gives their belt much more legitimacy. The UFC only has a handful of the world’s lightweights. Melendez dominated the guy tearing through everyone in Japan. Alvarez is beating everyone that the UFC doesn’t give a chance to.
Whoever wins gets the #2 spot in my book.
The UFC has six of the top ten lightweights
The next closest promotion doesn’t have two. I don’t see how you put either of those guys above Maynard (who I actively dislike). I’m hardly a UFC homer, but the sheer volume of high-level talent in the promotion makes it really hard for me to accept that Alvarez or Melendez could ever be #1, or even #2, in the global LW standards.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on Sep 17, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Outside of the top few, they aren’t beating guys that are necessarily better than the guys Alvarez and Aoki are beating. They’re just there by default. The UFC gets the tiebreaker when you can’t make any other comparison.
When BJ kept beating nearly undefeated fighters, he deserved his top rank, and by corollary so does the winner of Edgar-Maynard. If Melendez beats Alvarez, then he’ll have done the same, and arguably more: Aoki and Melendez have risen to the top two different pools of fighters, whereas Penn and Maynard rose to the top of the same pool. It’s unfair to say that either Penn or the Maynard-Edgar loser deserves to be ranked above Melendez if he wins.
Its a tossup which I have no problem giving to the UFC champ.
So what you're saying is
Beating Eddie Alvarez should count just as much as beating BJ Penn?
I think beating Alvarez and Aoki should count about as much as beating Penn and Maynard, and should count more than beating Edgar and Florian while sort of losing to Diaz.
Beating just Penn counts significantly more than beating just Aoki, hence I am fine with the current rankings. The article is more of a what if, though, considering realistic possible matchups.
You need to drop the Diaz line
I scored that fight for Diaz too, but if you start unpacking wins and losses, the already messy ranking process becomes impossible. In every way that matters, Maynard beat Diaz, and gets the credit for the win in any ranking.
So beating fighters who have faced lesser competition, and tallied lesser records, gets you the same consideration?
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on Sep 17, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions
There is no objective measure by which the guys that Alvarez and Melendez have fought, are as good, or near as good, as a whole as the guys that any of the top UFC LWs have fought.
Their opponents don’t have better records and they haven’t faced stiffer competition. In fact the two guys at the top of the UFC LW division right now – Maynard and Edgar – have better records against better guys than both Alvarez and Melendez.
The fact that they’ve beaten up on different pools of second-tier fighters is also not a logical argument in their favor. Penn, Maynard and Edgar did rise to the top of the same pool — which also happens to be the best pool by all objective criteria. As long as one of those guys stands at the top of that pool, there is no way that a fighter who hasn’t even swum in it can pass, or even approach them.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on Sep 17, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
You're missing the point
There is no objective measure to say that Florian or Maynard are at a higher level than Aoki or Alvarez. You can’t say that the former have beaten higher level competition than the latter.
I’m not talking about current rankings, and neither is the article. The idea is whether it is possible make a case that a fighter outside the UFC is the number one.
So IF Melendez beats Alvarez then I say it’s a tossup. Two very high levels wins for each champ over guys that have proven to be above the rest of the field (where it’s hard to say that the UFC gets the best in the world).
(where it’s hard to say that the UFC gets the best in the world).
It’s really not. Look, I love all MMA. I stayed up all night on twitter watching the last DREAM event. But the fact is, the best of the best in these orgs, especially in Japan, have always faltered when tested versus the UFC’s best.
Everyone agrees that during their hayday, PRIDE had the best HW and arguably the best LHW divisions in MMA. When PRIDE collapsed, so did the last real contender for having the best divisions in the sport.
Standing atop DREAM and Bellator is a nice accomplishment, but it is nowhere near getting to the top of the UFC’s lightweight division.
It’s pretty much the definition of the term “big fish in a small pond”. For some people it’s better to be the champion of a B-level org than a contender in the A-level one.
I'm not missing anything
There is, in fact, an objective way to say that Maynard is affirmatively better than Aoki, Alvarez and Menendez. He has a better record than all of those fighters, and he’s fought better guys — not just based on those guys’ rankings, but on their respective records against other fighters.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on Sep 17, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
For fun lets compare
Lets compare Shinya Aoki’s ranked LW opposition against Gray Maynard since 2008:
Shinya is 7-2 against the #2, #3, #8, #8, #8, #11, #12, #19, and #21 LW.
His ranked opponents combined record since: 30-17 (.638)
His opponents opponents combined record since 2008: 233-112 (.675)
Gray Maynard is 5-0 against the #4, #16,#17, #18, and #24 LWs.
His ranked opponents combined record since 2008: 26-10 (.722)
His opponents opponents combined record since 2008: 164-79 (.675)
Now I would say Maynard has the better record than Aoki, mostly for the fact that he hasn’t lost yet. But people love to shit on Aoki when it absolutely demonstrable that he has one of the best records in the sport against some of the best competition. And if one recalls the fact that his loss to Hellboy was on the same night that he had gone 15 minutes previously with Caol Uno, it’s not quit the blemish on his record people make it out to be.
The fun thing is we’ll have a direct comparison soon enough when Alvarez faces Huerta.
by John Nash on Sep 17, 2010 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I hate that I've somehow ended up defending Gray Maynard
But people keep moving the goal posts in this discussion in an effort to support what I think is an un-winnable argument.
I’d like to see the same breakdown of the opponents that Alvarez and Melendez have faced, since, they — not Aoki — were the the ones being put forward as possible number ones.
I don’t know about other people, but I have never shit on Aoki, who I vastly prefer to Gray Maynard in every possible way. That said, I can still rationally realize that Maynard’s accomplishments top those of Aoki. Their opponents may look the same, but 5-0 is a lot more impressive to me than 7-2.
And while I’ve tried to keep this out of the subjective, does anybody really think that a bigger, stronger Maynard would have any trouble implementing the same game plan Melendez used to beat Aoki?
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on Sep 18, 2010 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions
alvarez cant be no1
he lost to aoki he would atleast wanna avenge that for some redemption,but i doubt they will ever fight anytime soon
Right now, I think there is no problem with calling Edgar number 1.
If Melendez and Alvarez fought, I’d have no problem naming the winner number 1.
Things get interesting if Edgar loses to Maynard though.
penn has long been the number one guy at 155… edgar beat him twice…the second time dominated him… if that doesn’t make edgar number 1…then rankings are even more useless than i had previously thought.
i think alvarez can compete with any lightweight in the ufc and would love to see it but until he does, it’s hard to say where he ranks…def a top 10 guy, probably top 5. he has the style to beat maynard, the power to hurt and handle florian…i want to see it. i think eddie beats melendez who is a good fighter but a little over rated at the moment.
I’d pick Melvin Guillard to beat Gilbert Melendez :p
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 10:19 AM EDT reply actions
You're nuts
Have a free monocle and top hat!
"Now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb."
by menckenstein on Sep 17, 2010 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions
YUP. 2011- the year of lil’ monster! haha
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Sep 17, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Oooooh, very nice.
I’d put money on a sane and sober Melvin Guillard over just about anybody at LW. Wouldn’t favor him though.
But if you put him against Ben Henderson, it would be a murder scene. Hair and chunks of dehydrated flesh would be hanging from the cage as the production crew, drenched in mediocre-wrestler blood, aren’t sure if they should start screaming in terror or put a Slayer song over the PA.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
lol
You really do hate Benson’s ranking. I think he v Melendez would involve some slick sub attempts.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I really do.
Beating Varner and Cerrone is nothing. The WEC has three LWs who’s credibility traces back to Razor Rob. Think about that real hard for a minute. Aside from each other, the best win on anybodies record is Razor Rob. Varner washed out of the UFC in one fight, Cerrone never even got the call, and those are the wins that makes Ben Henderson fringe top 10? Fuck that. Guillard beat Siver and Tibau, two known quantities, and doesn’t get top 25 treatment.
Henderson is not a great fighter. He cuts too much weight and does it poorly. His takedowns are weak and he can’t get anywhere unless it’s via a scramble. His striking sucks. The best thing you can say about him is he’’ll capitalize if his opponent leaves a big enough opening. He’s what happens if Clay Guida trades his cardio for a scrunchie.
Melendez by TKO via sufficient boxing, respectable power, better conditioning, and overall better MMA skills. Think first minute of Bendo vs. Roller but much, much more brutal.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Sep 17, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Technically Varner didn’t wash out of the UFC in 1 fight. He lost to Franca, then subbed Jason Gilliam (remember the worm dance?), then was moved to the WEC.
http://www.instrength.com
Don't let facts get in the way of a good rant!
Forgot about the Gilliam fight, good catch. I don’t think it changes my point but thanks for the correction.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Here’s the better question: What top 20 lightweights does Henderson actually beat? I don’t know how he beats Gleason Tibau, for instance.
by VirtualBalboa on Sep 17, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Ben Henderson is not remotely top 10
Mo Johnston finally fired. Let the house cleaning and road to success begin.
Lets say for whatever reason
Penn/Edgar 3 is about to go down. How many of us still pick Penn as the favorite?
"If by romantic, you mean homosexual"-Luke Thomas
"Yea he builds hot rods mostly, sometimes faces"- Carl ATHF
by II SMASH II on Sep 17, 2010 10:32 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
It’s funny how Edgar keeps being the underdog and winning. He’s like the anti Brock Larson.
by Mint on Sep 17, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Very nice
Larson fucked up a LOT of parlays last year. Then again, so did Edgar.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
I actually used Larson to my advantage by picking him to lose and adding that to some round-robins. I just couldn’t understand how people were so confident in him winning, so I bet on his opponent and even if I was wrong it would have a fairly small impact due to the odds.
Losing twice when you’re -600 is a pretty big disappointment.
The idea of Frankie Edgar being the best LW in the world doesn't sit well with me,
but I don’t see how you can give that title to anyone else. He beat the best LW in the world, twice. He has only one blemish on his record, and that against a top-five LW and the #1 contender. He has had to fight his way through the deepest, best LW division in the world, and when he got his title shot he took advantage.
Neither Alvarez nor Melendez has anywhere near his strength of schedule, and that won’t change if one beats up on the other.
And if Gray Maynard beats Edgar again [shudders] then he will be undefeated in the same division, and a clear number 1.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Dave Strummer on Sep 17, 2010 10:33 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
looking pure strength of victories, there is no way that frankie or gray aren’t one. it’s just silly to posit anything else. I’d say that Jim Miller would probably handle either guy. I also think Anthony Pettis, who is yet somewhat unproven, would beat either guy. Hell, Jose Aldo would probably beat either guy.
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Sep 17, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
The UFC has it pretty good
No matter who wins between Edgar and Maynard, the winner is clearly the best in the world :)
I think if Melendez wins, his schedule is pretty good, because Aoki and Alvarez are guys that are dominating pools of fighters that the UFC doesn’t have access to. When a guy like Antonio McKee doesn’t get a UFC offer until he turns 40, it’s clear that the second-tier fighters in the UFC are not the best of the rest.
So then it becomes a tossup, and you have to rank him at #2 or #1.
No matter who wins between Edgar and Maynard, the winner is clearly the best in the world :)
Yes, exactly. Beating the best makes you the best. This isn’t rocket science.
by Jason H. on Sep 17, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Werdum is the best heavyweight in the world then.
Sorry Brock.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Ah, Fedor
The exception to the rule…the top ranked fighter who just avoids top competition long enough to let him fall off the rankings.
If Frankie Edgar spends the next few years fighting guys who are outside the top 10, or hell, even outside the top 5, then I’ll concede that perhaps we should rank a non-UFC guy at #1 in LW.
Because there's always an exception
if it doesn’t fit your conclusion. Awesome.
By the way, you gotta do me a favor and stop commenting on Total MMA. Your stances are so ridiculous and inaccurate that reading your posts makes me audibly giggle before you even get to the ad hominem section, and it’s getting me in trouble at work.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Total MMA
It’s a good book, there’s obviously a lot of affection there for the Lion’s Den and some really interesting stories about them, and a lot of stuff I never knew about Pancrase and all of that. There’s also a fairly obvious animosity towards the Zuffa folks.
Like when you bitching about his "peak" comment because he didn't have enough foresight in 2008?
Yeah, he was clearly cheerleading against Zuffa. Except guess what, the UFC hasn’t outdone the Chuck vs. Tito II paid gate in their home state. Not even with UFC 100.
http://boxing.nv.gov/New_MMAGates.htm
You gotta do some research, before you bitch about this stuff. Seriously. It’s sad the obsession people have with haranguing certain writers. And you sir, are one of the top harangutans.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
So?
You act as if live gate is the only, or even main source of revenue for the UFC. Nobody in the world would argue that UFC 66 was more successful than UFC 100.
If I say today, “little do you know, the NASDAQ has peaked” and then it spends the next 2 years going higher than what I said, I am wrong. Stating something has peaked is explicitly saying that it will never do better. I’m having a hard time telling if you just really don’t get what the word means, or you’re just trying to be argumentative.
The guy declared the sport peaked in 2006 when he wrote a book in 2008. He was wrong, and it’s continued to get bigger.
A very easy way to not get dinged for your predictions being wrong is to not make predictions. There are a million ways to state that was the most successful event thus far without making a statement on the future events, the author chose to declare it would be the most successful event the organization ever had.
The author chose poorly.
It’s funny that you comment on my book quite a bit, but also admit to having not read the sections you are complaining about. The book ends with my suggestion that Zuffa has laid the groundwork for a sport that could thrive for decades to come. You suggesting I was pessimistic is crazy. If I was pessimistic, what would have been the point of writing about it? I sold the book to publishers based on what I expected to be a huge growth in the MMA audience. I’m glad I was right!
When I wrote the book, the UFC had peaked with Tito-Chuck II. That was the status at the time. They have since been able to exceed that total. I think that’s great. It’s not really indicative of some kind of anti-UFC campaign.
by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 17, 2010 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Fedor
Also most would agree that Fedor’s situation is pretty unique. Or perhaps you think he’s just another ordinary fighter in an ordinary situation?
I don't have a dog in this fight but I'd agree that UFC has continuied to grow and will continue since 2006
I know I put myself on a limb there
Drink to remember, drink to forget.
by doonerthesooner on Sep 17, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Well I think we should all look at this objectively. If we were to ask how does a fighter establish himself as the best fighter in his division, I’m rather sure that the answer would be accumulate wins over highly ranked opponents and thereafter definitively beat the fighter currently ranked as the best fighter in the division. Or as the old saying goes “to be the man you have to beat the man”. In some cases this is impossible as all fighters are not under the same banner. At which time the argument would have to be that the overall quality of your opponents and victories exceeds that of any other ranked fighter.
Now if we can agree that objectively and irregardless of weightclass or division this is our criteria we can apply it to this specific situation. Frankie Edgar did accumulate a number of quality wins over ranked opponents Griffin, Sherk etc and he definatively beat BJ Penn (at least the second time). I don’t think we can argue that any other fighter has superior wins to Edgar’s. BJ Penn was considered the best in his weight class and he lost twice to Edgar, and Edgar has a good resume of wins against quality opponents previous to that.
Unfortunately Edgar seems to be overlooked and questioned simply because he’s small.
Gray has the same good amount of wins, except BJ, and holds a win over Frankie. I’d say they’re 1a and 1b
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Sep 17, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Lets use the title belt as a tie breaker...
I like Fedor, it’s just his fans that are intolerable...and his management.
Alvarez is #1 in my books, so he needs to win against top competition to solidify it?
Mo Johnston finally fired. Let the house cleaning and road to success begin.
by SSreporters on Sep 17, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
McKee is number 1 in my book
he just needs a win over a top 5 to solidify it.
Andy Wang is #1 in my book
He just is.
Mo Johnston finally fired. Let the house cleaning and road to success begin.
by SSreporters on Sep 17, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
no
there just isn’t enough depth elsewhere in other orgs. I’ve seen fighters that look awesome somewhere else come to the UFC and not even make it close to the top. I think that unless a division fell apart completely in the UFC, and strikeforce or another org really filled up that same div with quality people, then it doesn’t make sense.
And as it is, I would be Penn, Edgar and a few others could beat Melendez. But I guess he looks impressive fighting guys that aren’t really top fivers in the sport.
If Clay Guida got a title shot and beat BJ Penn I wouldn't put him at #1
Because like in college football, if you’re that far out in the rankings the “beat #1 to be #1” argument is invalid.
But Frankie Edgar got his shot, beat Penn twice when he was the underdog in both, and now he’s the #1 in the world. Melendez and Alvarez have no argument in this whatsoever.
Mo Johnston finally fired. Let the house cleaning and road to success begin.
Let's look at that question:
“Right now, looking at the Bloody Elbow/USA Today rankings, four of the top 10 and seven of the top 20 lightweights compete outside of the UFC. Is it fair then, when determining who the top fighters in the division are, to limit our consideration to a select group of UFC stars?”
6 of the top 10 are in one organization and fighting one another, and the other 4 are spread out among 3 organizations.
13 of the top 10 are in one organization and fighting one another, and the other 7 are spread out among 5 organizations, (one of which is nothing more than the minor leagues of the first organisation).
So yeah. If that’s the one organization where most of the best fighters are, then yes.
And that’s not taking into account:
- how many of the folks putting together rankings like to stick non-UFC fighters on their lists just to avoid the appearance of bias and give a little promotional boost to the little guys.
- how often guys get mysterious bumps up the list because they’re scheduled to fight somebody higher up the rankings [cough]Fedor[cough].
- other ranking irregularities.
Serious question: Gilbert Melendez is number 3 on the meta-rankings. Could he beat Kenny? Gray? Let me answer that for you: no, and no. Sotiropoulos would be a good fight, but Gilbert doesn’t belong in the top 5.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Sep 17, 2010 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 7 recs
"13 of the top 10 are in one organization"
That’s a crowded top 10.
Mo Johnston finally fired. Let the house cleaning and road to success begin.
by SSreporters on Sep 17, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Sorry. Hurried. You get the point.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
Yep. Hence the rec from me.
Mo Johnston finally fired. Let the house cleaning and road to success begin.
by SSreporters on Sep 17, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
And it was funny, hence the rec on your reply from me.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
Gil could beat Kenny. Gray would probably outwrestle him. 3 is not indefensible for Gil.
http://www.instrength.com
Nor is it realistic.
Would you put money on Gil beating Kenny? What would the line be on that?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
The line? I have no idea, I’d guess Kenny would open as a small favorite. I think Gil would win the fight with his jab and wrestling. He wouldn’t be giving up size like he would be to Maynard. Kenny wouldn’t be able to get anything going against him, IMO. Melendez by decision. # 3 in the world is realistic to me. This is all fantasy booking anyway, but that’s how I’d see it.
http://www.instrength.com
If the fight happened today, I certainly would
As for the lines, look at how people understimated Rogers against Arlovski. IIRC, he was a +300 underdog. Most opinion comes from the UFC. So yeah, I’d probably get good odds.
You are seriously using Rogers / Arlovski...
and the example of odds makers underestimating a fight? That is ridiculous.
I like Fedor, it’s just his fans that are intolerable...and his management.
* how many of the folks putting together rankings like to stick non-UFC fighters on their lists just to avoid the appearance of bias and give a little promotional boost to the little guys.
* how often guys get mysterious bumps up the list because they’re scheduled to fight somebody higher up the rankings [cough]Fedor[cough].
* other ranking irregularities.
While this is a popular sentiment, it seems to be a myth. What bump up did Sylvia, Arlvoski, Barnett, Rogers, and Werdum get? Sylvia left the UFC at #5. Arlovski rose because he beat Rothwell and Nelson and because Nog and Couture (the two higher rated fighters at the time) lost. Same with Barnett.
Brett Rogers was number 8 following his victor over Arlovski on August 1, while fans were still thinking Fedor was going to sign with the UFC, and on the night of that fight after the famouse “bounce” he was… number 8!
Same with Werdum. Number 10 immediately following his victory over Bigfoot, and before a Fedor fight was announced, and then after the big inflation… number 9 on the night of the fight!
And yet no brings up examples of Frank Mir rising from unranked into the top 10 for the interim title on the strength of two wins over unranked opponents. Or Shane Carwin rising to number 6 in Fall of last year on the strength of a win over GG and an announced title fight.
While I believe the preponderance of the best fighters are in the UFC it is amazing how far some feel they have to go to prove that only UFC fighters matter.
As an example, Roger Huerta goes 6-2 in the UFC, beating top 25 clay guida, and only losing to contender Kenny Florian and a split decision to (maybe the future champ?) Gray Maynard, but if Eddie Alvarez destroys him I’m sure everyone will say it doesn’t matter because Huerta is not in the UFC. In fact that seems to be the circular logic most use; only fighters in the UFC matter; if you don’t fight in the UFC you don’t matter, even if you proved yourself in the UFC.
First I'd heard of this "Fedor Bump"
and I do think it’s bullshit
However I do think there is a tendency to uprank guys outside of the UFC just to look more objective. Aoki is a great example…I love to watch the guy fight, but he built up into top 10 just by looking really good against lower level opponents.
How can you say Aoki is overrated?
Since 2008 he is 10-2 at LW with victories over opponents who were ranked #3, #12, #2, #21, #8, #11, and #8, and his only losses were to opponents ranked 19 and 8. I can’t think of another LW with victories over 7 ranked opponents since 2008.
How about Maynard?
Siver, Clementi (debatable), Edgar, Miller, Huerta, Diaz, Florian not doing it for you?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Sep 17, 2010 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Maynard has beaten 5 ranked LWs;
#16 Edgar, #18 Miller, #24 Huerta, #17 Diaz, and #4 Florian.
That’s good. Still don’t think it is as strong as BJ’s, Aoki’s, or Edgar’s schedule.
He does hold the advantage of not having any losses.
Bolts from the Blue // "It is what it is." - A.J. Smith
Bloody Elbow // "Richard is a jewel." - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Sep 17, 2010 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions
NOPE NEVER NADA
Same reason Werdum went 2-2 and now is da best, or Diaz got cut and now if a champ. Fighting 2 cans then 1 good guy isn’t the same.
Yes there are fighters out there who can be world champions who don’t fight in the UFC. But you guys always hang your hat on “FighternotinUFCbestinworld” and we read that crap until he loses then you are off to the next guy. Been hearing it for 3+ years now. Not gonna happen, sorry sell that BS to someone else. It was well written though.
Frankie...
May not be as tested, but in that second BJ fight, he looked like a very very talented fighter and he beat the hell out of BJ. His striking game looked great—he might not be as much of a knockout artist, but he certainly has more stand-up skills than Gil.
And you know why we lean toward the UFC champion? Because he’s going to get tested in his very next fight. What’s the one thing that BJ didn’t test on Frankie? His wrestling. Now he’s going to go up against a bonifide wrestler who is much bigger than he is.
Do you really think Gli is better than Gray at wrestling? I don’t.
I understand the Melendez hype, but there’s something you have to keep in mind: The strongest man always has the hardest climb.
B.J. Penn was the best lightweight in the world, and he seemed unstoppable. A proverbial Mount Everest for any lightweight. Then, Frankie Edgar climbs Everest, and then when people try to claim that it was luck, he does it again, but better. No offense to Melendez, Aoki, or Alvarez, but Zuffa is the NFL of MMA. Whoever is the champion of the UFC is the number one guy in the world. Bar none.
For me, its not about rankings. Whatever, the UFC fighters can have the higher rankings, that doesn’t matter to me. In fact, it doesn’t really matter to anybody. Its about who would win the hypothetical fight. I would take Gilbert over anybody in the UFC not named Gray, and I would take Alvarez over anybody in the UFC besides Gray, Kenny, or Edgar. Aoki could definitely catch Edgar or a couple of guys at the top. Florian and Maynard are tough fights for him that’s for sure, but he would be a force.
"I am a man who pisses largely and frequently, which they say is a sign of great mental activity" -Henry Miller-
Aoki over Edgar
Really? I think he’d have the exact same problem he had with Melendez, which is he has no way to get it to the ground, and his striking is non-existent
Sure a fighter can be the best if he isn’t in the UFC, as long as he’s in the WEC the other home for the best fighters in the world.
Aside from that anyone trying to make a claim that guys like Melendez or Alvarez should be put over Edgar of ranked as high as they are now is out of their minds.
These guys keep living off beating talent that isn’t good enough to be middle of the pack UFC guys. Henderson has more of a claim to make thanks to his wins at LW over Varner and Cerrone than anyone else outside the Zuffa family.
"they mad at me, I keep going hard reppin/
cause what's your Rampage to Rashad Evans/"
-Joe Budden (Something To Ride To)
http://www.zshare.net/audio/76866807deabe3c1/
Water is wet, grass is green & Egar is #1, deal with it.
I will try to keep this short.
Melendez and Alvarez (who I am a huge fan of) are talented top 10 fighters. But they lose out on Ichiban status due to their strength of opposition.
If Melendez can put up a string of solid title defenses against guys like JZ,Noons (not a high caliber opponent but still dangerous) and Alvarez then he can make a case.
Gil almost fnished Aoki (still don’t know why Yamasaki stood them up as Gil was dropping bombs) and made him look like an rookie by shutting down his main offensive tool.
Eddie, despite losing to Aoki has not lost since and has improved his sub game to compliment his heavy handed boxing style. That being said ruling the roost over at Bellator over decent but fringe top 20 and 30 opposition inspires confidence but I doubt his status as a world beater.
In Frankie Edgar you have a perpetual underdog who will always be regarded as such because of his diminutive size and fleet footed technique heavy style. I was a fan of his and still picked BJ to win both times. His next defense will have him avenging his only loss and if he does that, as many have said before it reinforces his #1 lightweight status.
As long as Edgar is the champ he will face nothing but top 10 guys, same can’t be said for Gil and Eddie.
Can’t wait to see McKee and Bendo in the UFC.
People do not like to think. If one thinks, one must reach conclusions. Conclusions are not always pleasant.
- Helen Keller

by 





















