Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

Sports Writers on UFC 118: Mainstream Breakdowns Show Why UFC Is a Niche Promotion

UFC 118, Main card, poster

One thing that those of us in the mixed martial arts bubble tend to forget is that the sport isn't for everyone. We love it, love the intricacies, how complicated the action can be, how it is truly a game of human chess. But the parts we love, to many potential fans, look like two guys dry humping on the ground. We are past the point where most sports writers and critics are calling for the sport to be banned. Everyone recognizes the UFC's tremendous economic success. Now the sport faces an even larger hurdle: aesthetic tastes. Josh Gross had Sports Illustrated's Chris Mannix on his podcast recently and Mannix, an NBA and boxing reporter, expressed the concerns of many viewers succintly:

"I enjoyed it when there was action but I think my problem with the UFC and a lot of people, other people’s problem with the UFC is when they get on the ground and I know there’s skill to it, I know it’s a talent, I’m not taking anything away from that, I mean these guys are phenomenal athletes, I mean they’re as good as athletes as any boxers out there and you really can’t dispute that in any stretch of the imagination… but when they get on the ground it’s just, far too many lulls for me and one thing I wish they would do more of is I wish there was more breaks, I wish the referee would step in there and break some of that action up or break some of those dead spots up. There’s definitely a rhyme and a reason to it obliviously, these guys are trying to get different holds on and they’re trying to do different things on the mat but sometimes and I think the crowd backed me up with this, I didn’t feel like I was alone in this, but when there were you know 1 minute, 1 1/2 minutes, 2 minutes lulls in the action which really happened and I’ll point out one great example, I thought the Kenny Florian fight was the perfect example of that. It was just… so much on the mat action that it seemed like for 14 out of the 15 minutes, we were just watching two guys kind of hug it out on the ground there.

Transcription by Fight Opinion

The Boston Globe's voluble Bob Ryan also sounded off on the show, which he attended live. Ryan thought the spectacle was reminiscent of pro wrestling and was impressed with the presentation:

UFC has borrowed very heavily from wrestling, and why not? Vince McMahon hit upon a winning formula with music and pageantry, and story lines, and there is no reason why it wouldn’t transfer nicely to UFC. There has to be a great carryover fandom. Why would someone settle for the phoniness and absolute idiocy of the wrestling show when you can see better athletes engaged in legitimate combat and still get all of the trappings the WWE has to offer?

But the action in the cage wasn't to his tastes:

These guys are athletes. Make no mistake about that. A boxing round lasts three minutes. These rounds last five. They do need to be trained in multiple disciplines. No one can ever say these guys aren’t superb athletes, but that doesn’t mean the sport they practice is the prettiest thing to watch.

Now you can’t say everything goes. They did away with eye-gouging some time back. But kneeing and elbowing are prime tactics, and, c’mon, what’s so artistic about that? If you love a flat-out barroom brawl, replete with wrestling, kicking, kneeing, elbowing and, yep, punching, then this may be the sport for you. But to some, a little of that goes a long way. Frankly, after watching an evening of UFC, up close and personal, I came away with a better appreciation of boxing.

This is what we tend to miss when we jump up on our soapboxes and chastize the mainstream media for failing to cover the sport. This isn't a sport everyone can embrace. And it's not just generational. Mannix is no old fogey sportswriter chomping on a cigar and reminiscing about Walt "Clyde" Frazier. He's 34 years old. He is the next generation of leadership in the sports media field.

For some it is too boring - for others the action is just too visceral, the blood too real. Either way, it's not for everyone. And as much as we hate to admit it, MMA may never stand side by side with football and basketball as a mainstream entity.

Ufc_118_button_medium

Comment 350 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As popular as the UFC and mma has become in such a short period of time, I just don’t believe that it will ever be close to the big 3 of pro sports. As negative as that sounds I just don’t see it happening. MMA is basically what soccer and hockey are in America but to a slightly lesser extent.

Nope

by NaciremaDream on Sep 1, 2010 11:06 AM EDT reply actions  

I really think the better target is what boxing once was decades ago. Boxing was big! No reason to believe UFC/MMA won’t be just as big, if not a little bigger.

Hard to compare against something like NFL. Apples and oranges.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Exactly. Cant even compare it to soccer or hockey, as it’s no where near those two either. Major League Soccer is averaging about 18k per game attendance, for 16 teams over a 30 game season, and the NHL averages about 17k per game for 30 teams over an 82 game season.

The violence of MMA will never let it achieve the popularity of stick and ball sports, and i’m ok with that.

by GKINMD on Sep 1, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was just responding to the article about trying to compare it to those sports, you can’t. That is also why I compared it to hockey and soccer. if you took a poll of ten random people bet they couldn’t name five NHL or MLS players but they would know at least 5 in the other NFL, NBA, MLB. To a casual fan soccer and hockey is unbearable, much like mma.

Nope

by NaciremaDream on Sep 1, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I heard Mannix on the Jim Rome Show

He admitted that he needed to see more for a final opinion. He didn’t care for fighters like Edgar and Maynard wrestling themselves to victory.

"Dodger fans aren’t happy when foul balls get into their section, because it interferes with their playing with the beachball"- Mike Krukow

by 49er16 on Sep 1, 2010 11:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Some more quotes – http://www.csnne.com/pages/video?PID=V79A0gv_IzdfTBZ4qe64i7N4T0iFdAWa

“In all honesty, I’m just telling the truth. The biggest revelation I got from spending that evening at the Garden was how astonishingly BOOOOORRING this thing is,” Ryan said CSN’s New England’s “Sports Tonight”. “It is the most overrated … I do not remotely understand the appeal. There isn’t enough blood, there isn’t enough action.”

“The fans don’t like the wrestling,” said Ryan.

“Most of the fights in the early bouts, are guys in wrestling matches in which they were bad collegiate wrestling with nothing happening.”

by Nick Thomas on Sep 1, 2010 11:09 AM EDT reply actions  

interesting to hear one of the old fogey sportswriters in Bob Ryan saying there isn’t enough blood. i thought the old-guy book on MMA was that it’s still barbaric.

a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon

by eastcoastatlas on Sep 1, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bob Ryan is such a joke. I really take everyting in says in general about any sport or life topic with a grain of salt. That being said it really doesn’t help in getting mma mainstream.

Nope

by NaciremaDream on Sep 1, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

if you get past his voice and look

He truly is a huge sports fan and great writer.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

if i was going to try and turn someone on to mma i would not use ufc 118. i thought it was a decent card but have no trouble seeing how someone who saw this as their first event was not that impressed.

by mayabang on Sep 1, 2010 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

An analogy I like to use is offensive and defensive line play in football.

If all you could watch was that one part of the football game would it be as compelling?

I mean, I like watching to see where guards pull and how/when defense use stunts but it’s not exactly the most exciting thing.

That’s sort of what MMA is like. The grappling is something that most casual sports fans won’t grasp easily and that is such a significant part of MMA that its difficult.

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Sep 1, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Mainstream sportswriters

They’re all like the elderly: if they don’t understand the sport after a cursory viewing they get confused, if they get confused they get grumpy, if they get grumpy they become impatient and claim “it’s just not for me” and unfortunately people will take that opinion as their own and never get MMA a fair chance.

Whatever happened to due dilligence research?

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

are you interested in Nordic Combine?

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Sep 1, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Do I follow it?

No, but I’ve watched some and I certainly would never completely dismiss it in a wide spread (sports) publication.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Coincidentally ...

I covered Nordic combined at the 2010 Olympics. That’s where I first met Bob Ryan.

by Beau Dure on Sep 2, 2010 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

the older generation of journalism...

will never fully understand or truly appreciate our sport.

Frankly, after watching an evening of UFC, up close and personal, I came away with a better appreciation of boxing.

Funny after watching boxing, I come away thanking god for MMA.

by Dark Tower on Sep 1, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

No – you get it, you just don’t like it… they’re different.

by E. Spencer Kyte on Sep 1, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be completely fair...

Lots of people don’t like boxing either. Combat sports aren’t for everyone.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

was this a subtle advertisement for UB.net?

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

But kneeing and elbowing are prime tactics, and, c’mon, what’s so artistic about that?

Fighting isn’t art most sports aren’t. This guy comes to a UFC looking for art, well no it’s not made for you.

I'm a lover not a fighter

by spectaa on Sep 1, 2010 11:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Wait, you mean the mainstream stick and ball sports haven’t been altering their rules for years to encourage “Aesthetic” play?

sports are entertainment. The rules inform the gameplay and the rules in the mainstream, big money sports, encourage what the consumers want, which, is usually beautiful, beautiful offense.

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Sep 1, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

martial ARTS

Facts don't come with points of view.

by Robert Livingston on Sep 1, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

In Japanese they say “do” for “way” or “jutsu” for “techniques”, they don’t kid themselves believing fighting is art. You can find estheticism in fights but the purpose is to destroy, not create, or it’s just dancing.

I'm a lover not a fighter

by spectaa on Sep 1, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly, I think Muay Thai techniques are one area where the UFC announce team could use some help. The only Muay Thai technique where Rogan actually breaks down the technique is leg kicks (turning over the hip, landing with the shin). I really think they could benefit from having a third guy in the booth who has a striking background. Having someone in the booth who could point out striking techniques the same way Rogan points out BJJ techniques would go a long way to helping fans understand the nuances of striking.

Back in the day (before he quit caring), Bas Rutten used to be excellent at calling combinations before they happened and explaining why a fighter throws a certain combination. He was also very good at pointing out when a guy used exceptional technique such as when Anderson Silva throws knees to the legs and actually turns over his hip for extra power versus just slamming ‘em in there. It’s a shame Bas has become a parody of himself and kind of sucks these days.

by Steve4192 on Sep 1, 2010 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good

Facts don't come with points of view.

by Robert Livingston on Sep 1, 2010 11:12 AM EDT reply actions  

is the UFC not for them, or was it simply 118 was not for them?

These writers are reacting to UFC 118. Aside from Lauzon, Couture, and maybe Diaz or Dan Miller, the event on the whole was pretty dull.

Lentz, Maia, Maynard, and Edgar were all long, drawn out decisions that weren’t very exciting. No surprise that Bob Ryan or others are coming to these conclusions.

So maybe UFC 118 didn’t do the trick for Bob Ryan. But perhaps he tunes in for UFC 121, and there is fast-paced, exciting grappling, and just like that you’ve got a new fan.

I don’t think it’s impossible to convert a guy like him, rather that all the stars need to align… you need big names, good action, and he needs to happen to tune in. UFC 118 just wasn’t the right event.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:14 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

But ultimately, a lot of the sport looks like UFC 118. There are more “moments” in other shows. But it is what it is. And we may have to accept that MMA isn’t going to be for a huge number of people.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

No disagreement there. There’s too many people to try and win over, it’s just not going to happen for all of them.

But when Bob Ryan says “it’s not for me” I believe he’s wrong. If he tunes in a couple more times, or happens to see a couple of those “moments” he will be a convert. He just doesn’t know it yet.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

that sounds like some Christian missionary,
“HEY, I know you aren’t really interested in going to church or this whole Jesus thing but if you just keep coming more I KNOW you will like it.”

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Sep 2, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

difference though

is that MMA is real :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 2, 2010 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

And I would argue

That MMA is the least real of the two…

But you’re entitled to your beliefs…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 2, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

beliefs?

sure buddy :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 2, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

There is a dirty truth to MMA (which is a sport that I love, and have no intention of ever NOT watching): 60-70% of the fights arent that good. I mean, I’m sure I’m going to get torched for this, but ……..honestly, if you enjoy combat sports and drama, there was more back and forth drama and action in any one of the Gatti-Ward fights then there has ever been in an MMA match. The UFC’s “Top 100 foghts of all time”, I mean, what, 7 out of 10 were one sided ass whipping blowouts? Thats the dark truth of MMA: 80% of the fights are one sided ass whippings.

by Hutchy on Sep 1, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think you are right. Which is why boxing will always have a place. There can’t be a MMA match that can match the best of boxing for drama and “epic-ness.”

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

“There can’t be a MMA match that can match the best of boxing for drama and ‘epic-ness.’”

Really?

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

in order for that to happen, i think you first need the match to represent something “more”. like if you had a title fight where the challenger represented the hopes and dreams of his whole country, or a certain social cause or issue.

and then you can have an epic fight… because it’s not just for a single winner or loser, but also represents that entire country or cause. and MMA is not quite there yet.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would agree 100% that MMA hasn’t and is not close to putting together fights that match some of the best boxing has to offer.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

i think i’m with you in that i think it will happen some day

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Machida Shogun 2?

Goldberg on Leben: One thing's for sure--he really did break that door on the Ultimate Fighter.
Rogan: uh...yeah.

by frosnt1 on Sep 1, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I am totally on board with this comment. There has not yet been a fight on that level but there COULD be

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

The most “epic” fight I know in boxing is rumble in the jungle. No MMA fight can match this yet, but it’s a pretty unfair comparison. There is no Ali in MMA.

I'm a lover not a fighter

by spectaa on Sep 1, 2010 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Sep 1, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

No way.

Anti-rec.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmm…if 80% of the fights were one sided ass whooping people wouldn’t call it boring right?
I mean people loved Ruedigger vs Lauzon. Each time there is a quick KO or a quick sub people go crazy.

I'm a lover not a fighter

by spectaa on Sep 1, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

lol

what?

Facts don't come with points of view.

by Robert Livingston on Sep 1, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

are you

talking about the ufc?

Facts don't come with points of view.

by Robert Livingston on Sep 1, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

1) You’re making up statistics.
2) X% of boxing fights, baseball games, football games are one-sided blowouts, boring defensive stalls, etc.
3) Boxing has over 100 years of history. MMA has less than 20, and the first 5-10 years were not prolific.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not football or baseball huge.

But it can clearly grow from here. I do see a hurdle to its popularity being the primacy of wrestling as a fight dictator and the clear hesitation on the part of many upper tier mma wrestlers to go for broke and risk losing positional advantage. It’s a big problem as far as the growth of the sport goes — compare the popularity of a fighter like BJ to that of Edgar or Maynard. As everyone knows, the Maynards of the MMA world have figured out a way of out-pointing the dangerous, more virtuosic fighters, and there is a possibility that they will push these guys farther and farther from the top. Of course, then there are phenoms like Aldo and John Jones. These are the fighters who will punish any game-plan and they will create new fans because of it.

by Charlie Custer on Sep 1, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you honestly think these writers gave MMA a fair shake

I dunno what to say. That seems like some pretty intense naivety to me.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein"
- Goonisis

by Goonisis on Sep 1, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

118

was a great card imo

Facts don't come with points of view.

by Robert Livingston on Sep 1, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Depends what you’re looking for. A fight like Florian/Maynard was very, very intriguing, because us hardcore fans know how good these two fighters are, and we’re so anxious to see how the fight will play out. So that adds some excitement for us, and in that sense it was a great card.

But for non-hardcore fans who don’t know anything about styles, or aren’t appreciative of the backstory behind Florian/Maynard, there is nothing great about it. It was a dull fight.

Dana White agrees… that’s why he lashed out [undeservedly] at Florian.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

i said

imo.

Facts don't come with points of view.

by Robert Livingston on Sep 1, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

ha, i like that. whenever i don’t want any counterpoints or disagreement, i too shall simply end my posts with “imo”

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

thats not why i use it

were you disagreeing with me?

Facts don't come with points of view.

by Robert Livingston on Sep 1, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lentz was by far the most drawn out and stalemate-ridden. This was probably the fight those writers were thinking of. Thank God for Joe Lauzon. That fight saved the Spike-cast.

Maynard’s was a close second, but was still interesting. Maia’s was predominantly-ground based, but it was fun to watch.

by INGO B on Sep 1, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Miller bout didn’t hurt either.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

I would have loved for these guys to have been in attendance at 116 or 117, those were both amazing events.

by Polyhedron on Sep 1, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Again, the ignorance of these guys like Chris Mannix astounds me. Lulls on the ground? Educate yourself on the ground game and there will be less “lulls”. So he basically wants nothing but stand up battles because that is the only aspect of fighting that he can comprehend.

by Bandaka on Sep 1, 2010 11:20 AM EDT reply actions  

It’s not ignorance. He recognizes things are going on. He says as much. But for him, as a viewer, it’s not entertaining. It is a lull. Not everything is about ignorance. Some of it is about taste. That’s what the future of the sport will come down to.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

recognizing and understanding

are not the same

Facts don't come with points of view.

by Robert Livingston on Sep 1, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

true

but for a lot of fans, they also recognized the skills on the ground but just didn’t enjoy it at first, but have come to appreciate it with time. This could also be true for most of these guys that have watched an MMA event for the first time.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

If you see somebody moving on the ground and can tell they are working for an arm bar it adds drama. If you don’t know what they are doing, nothing is exciting but the strikes and the finish.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Snowden is dead on here. You can fully, 100%, completely comprehend and grasp everything that is happening on the ground and still find it dull. Believe it or not (and the ex-high school wrestlers of the world find this astonishing), I can watch a Jon Fitch fight, fully grasp the intricate nature of the bout, and still find it to be like watching paint dry.

by Hutchy on Sep 1, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

The thing about Fitch is that even if you appreciate GnP it gets very redundant with him.

People love how MMA is unpredictable and how anything can happen. When this leaves I am not surprised that people get put off.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some people just have bad taste I guess. I imagine Chris Mannix’s idea of a good mma fight is sloppy kickboxing at best. Its not right for him to bash our sport becuase he can’t appreciate the finer aspects of the ground game. It would be like me going to a world cup soccer game and bitch about how no one ever makes a goal. That would be ignorance on my part.

by Bandaka on Sep 1, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

But you have to admit

There is a huge difference between say GSP-Alves or even GSP-Hardy than say Kos-Daley or Maynard-Florian. The GSP fights are genuinely enjoyable for most, the Kos or Maynard fights, not so much…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

It depends, was that your actual reaction to a world cup game? were you being paid to write an editorial on your reaction to the events? Because if so, you’d damn well better write it.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Your right, no one is paying me to write my crappy opinions. I also believe Chris Mannix is entitled to his own opinion. I think I just got a little too defensive sorry. The reality is that MMA isn’t for everyone and I totally understand that.

     Is Chris Mannix even trying to understand the ground game though? Seems to me he won’t even give it a chance maybe because he has preconceived notions of what fighting should look like. He acknowledges it takes skill at least so I give him credit for that. MMA is just not his cup of tea. We are all different and that is what makes the world such an interesting place to live on.

by Bandaka on Sep 2, 2010 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

I find MMA ground to be boring

I find ADCC, BJJ worlds exciting as hell, but it doesn’t translate to MMA because of many factors. Ground and pound, vaseline, and the lower number of “viable” techniques.

What makes grappling exciting? scrambles, exotic guards, exotic submissions

What makes mma grappling boring? Most people just use full guard and go for triangle, armbar, or guillotine. (i’m obviously generalizing there).

by IpullguardIRL on Sep 1, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

i think the current MMA ground game is in a little bit of an evolutionary awkward period. widespread submission defense is nullifying most submission offense. and wrestlers are using their overpowering control to keep the fights in lockdown.

but i don’t think it will necessarily stay this way. the sport keeps evolving; guys keep learning new tactics to deal with different styles.

allowing knees to the head on the ground would help, too.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Wrestler Guard Passing

I think another big change will be as wrestlers start learning grappling at an earlier age. Guard passing will become more natural (Ala GSP and John Jones). This will make the ground game a lot more exciting than the guard sitting we often see today.

by SES 84 on Sep 1, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

You would be hard pressed to find a more annoyingly persistent MMA Wrestling mark than myself, but

If the sport is going to continue its phenominal growth, the grappling purists (and hardcore fans in general) need to get over some of our prejudices. The fact of the matter is, for MMA to grow as a sport, what I call the “watchability” needs to be improved in certain cases. Like it or not, the today’s casual fan is potentially tomorrow’s hardcore fan.

Look at ways the NFL and NBA have increased the “fan friendliness” of their games over the last 30+ years with their rule changes. The NFL purists may love a game with a 5-3 final score, but the reality is the majority of fans won’t watch that on a regular basis. Think about some of the changes made to encourage or discourage certain styles of play (NBA – shot clock, iso plays / zone defense, hand checks, lane modifications. NFL – pass interference rules, holding rules, QB hits, etc, etc).

Fortunately this can be readily addressed with some simple changes at the UFC level first and, if that fails to improve things enough, at the athletic commission level, without damaging the product we love so much – if anything it will improve it for almost all of us.

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is something that bothers me...

no one should have to “educate” themselves on something that does not have an initial appeal to them. For some it captures their imagination and they want to learn more, for others it is boring and they have no desire. The idea that someone should take the time to educate themselves further on a form of entertainment they do not enjoy is absurd.

MMA is no different from any other activity. Some people LOVE to drink wine and have taken the time to “teach themselves” how to enjoy different types and appreciate different textures, flavors, etc. Some people just like to drink wine and get drunk. And others don’t like wine at all.

Some people can watch Floyd Mayweather box 12 rounds and find it beautiful, others find it boring and some people just find it a brief distraction from their everyday lives.

Some people found the Spurs amazing to watch during their run of patient disciplined basketball, some hated watching them, others were just happy a sport was on.

No one has any responsibility to enjoy or educate themselves on any form of entertainment. And before someone gets snippy about them writing a news article on it, it’s just an editorial describing their experience and reaction.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Those vineyards should listen to middle America and make it taste like Kool-Aid so they can sell it to more people. Until they do, it’s a niche drink.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boone’s Farm and many other “fruit juice wines” exist to serve that market.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then let Bob’s Backyard MMA handle that shit. Not the UFC.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

What does that have to do with anything?

My only point was that the sport isn’t for everyone and you turned it into something about the UFC vs. small time promotions.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 2, 2010 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Edgar wrestling himself to Victory!!!

What fight was this idiot watching, Edgar hardly used wrestling.

by decasere on Sep 1, 2010 11:21 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Maybe he was being poetic and referred to the inner struggle.

Nevermind.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Looked to me like Edgar spent most of the fight bouncing around on his feet, slipping in and out at will and hurting Penn coming and going in the standup. Honestly, I was wondering where does this guy get all that cardio? His gas tank must make a supertanker look like a Coke can.

You don't like wrestling in MMA? Go watch K-1.

by Monday Morning Martial Artist on Sep 1, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Side-by-Side with Football Isn't My Hope

As you said (very well BTW) being viewed alongside football and basketball is probably a pipe dream, and that is fine. I don’t want that.

What I do want is more coverage in total, and by people who know the sport. While Mannix and many others don’t like the lulls on the ground, even he said he understands guys are working for holds.

As such, standing them up eliminates that action and makes MMA all the more like boxing or kickboxing or muay thai and that isn’t the point. This sport is an amalgamation of those (and others) and while it doesn’t have to be accepted and appreciated by all, it has to at least be allowed to exist in it’s own style without watering it down and stripping away elements to appease people who don’t really like it in the first place.

I don’t worry about the Bob Ryans of the world any more because they are the old guard and they’re on their way out.

A small part of why I love this sport is because it is something not everyone understands / appreciate / likes.

Great piece, Jonathan…

by E. Spencer Kyte on Sep 1, 2010 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

see what a washed up boxer can do for the sport?

Toney obviously brought in more viewers for this card, you guys can call him a joke or whatever (honestly for MMA, he is), but he definitely brought in more viewers to MMA that would probably never have watched it otherwise. I’m sure a good chunk of the ‘new’ viewers for this card did not enjoy it, but there is a potential lower percentage that probably enjoyed it and will end up buying other cards. Sometimes the MMA community is too greedy, you cannot become a powerhouse sport over night. MMA is still new (compared to the history of other sports) to be considered among the other major sports, but that doesn’t mean it won’t get there in the near future. We’re growing, slowly and steady, give it another decade or so and the sport will most likely get the recognition it deserves. These journalists do represent most of these ‘new’ viewers, but not all. slow and steady I say we’ll get there…

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Different strokes for different folks I guess. For example, in my 30 years I’ve never understood whats so freakin great about baseball…..and that’s America’s pastime!

by joshyboy708 on Sep 1, 2010 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm with you there

and baseball fans, are pretty annoying, especially in Chicago.

by IpullguardIRL on Sep 1, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Being originally from Chicago I’m in complete agreement. Back a few years ago when the Cubs came close to the series, the entire city found a way to blame three straight losses to the Marlins on one fan. A couple years later the Sox did win, but no one cared.

by joshyboy708 on Sep 1, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

No one but half the city, right?

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ehhh…. if you think the Sox celebration was anywhere near what a Cubs celebration would have been then I want some of those drugs. And as I say that as someone who gives a rats f&ck about either team. But whatever I guess.

by joshyboy708 on Sep 1, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

“if you think the Sox celebration was anywhere near what a Cubs celebration would have been”

Yeah, but that’s not really what you said.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, you guys are confusing “dumb baseball fans in Chicago” with “dumb people everywhere.”

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I love baseball...

as a matter of fact I’m watching a game now.

I love football. I can watch high school, NCAA, pro..etc at any time.

I enjoy basketball but it’s not a must watch for me.

I also really enjoy watching tennis.

I can’t stand watching golf on TV despite enjoying playing the game. I also hate soccer. It bores the fuck out of me. No matter how many times soccer fans try to convince me that I need to watch more or need to understand it better…it’s not for me. I don’t find it enjoyable.

So yeah…different strokes.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oops...

I love playing baseball, but I hate watching it on TV.

I hate playing Golf, but I’d rather watch golf on TV.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

1.MMA
1a.Football
2.Basketball

534. Curling
535. Baseball

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I watch these:
Football
MMA
Hockey
Basketball

I will watch these if I am bored:
Extreme Sports
Poker
Curling
Women’s Tennis
Women’s Pool, but only if she is playing

Lacrosse
Golf
Darts
Bowling
Paint dry

Will not watch:
Baseball
Automobile racing

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve been raised with soccer and only soccer (France). Playing soccer at school, soccer after school, soccer on my console, reading soccer mangas, etc…That’s how we live in Europe, soccer or die.
Tonight I was watching a political debate about the roms and at some point the discussion shifted to soccer and Zidane teaching good conduct to the new players of the national team (sweet irony), it’s that deep.

I'm a lover not a fighter

by spectaa on Sep 1, 2010 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's nothing wrong with being in a niche

As Steve Jobs put it when someone asked him about Apple’s 10% market share in laptop computing, BWM and Mercedes Benz only control about 10% of the US auto market and they’re profitable and reputable companies

by IpullguardIRL on Sep 1, 2010 11:27 AM EDT reply actions  

The fallacy is that a niche has to be small. NASCAR is a niche sport, it just appeals to a very large niche group. MMA is big with 18 to 36 year old males but outside of that it just doesn’t have much appeal. There isn’t anything wrong with that, it’s a really big niche audience and there is still lots of growing room in that niche. It may never break out of that niche market though.

by who me on Sep 1, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

That niche market is growing

The average age of TUF viewers going up is a great sign – it means the 25 year olds that got into it 10 years ago have stuck with it.

It’s not a fucking fad. It’s a sport, and a damn fine one might I add, and we simply have no way of gauging how much further it can grow.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

The key will be if fans in that niche stick with it when they leave that niche(37+) but there is still plenty of growing room within that demographic too, it’s a damn good niche to be in.

by who me on Sep 1, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Knees, stomps, and kicks to downed opponents would fix this.

Not sure if I’m behind it. But after NY sanctions and the rest of the states do, it might be an option to consider.

by sacterre on Sep 1, 2010 11:27 AM EDT reply actions  

no that would never fly

no sanctioning body would ever allow it, its simply way way too brutal

We have a saying back home that if your coming on, COME ON!!!!

by milk72 on Sep 1, 2010 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did you see Marcus Daviss eye, i think we are past the point of brutal, now we want disfigurement!

by pandaboy99 on Sep 1, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is literally the worst idea i've ever heard.

So we want it sanctioned in more places, and then made incredibly more unsafe for fighters?

Jones/ Vera showed that elbows can be equally as devastating on the ground, and i’m sure we’ll see them done away with at some point.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

“So we want it sanctioned in more places, and then made incredibly more unsafe for fighters?”

Data to prove this?

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Data

I’m at work so I can’t look it up, but i’ve seen physicians reports on how traumatizing a knee strike to the top of the head would be. Then theres the Rashad Evans on sport science when he puts a hole in the dummy skeleton’s head.

If Jones can break Vera’s face in three places with a well placed elbow, he impale it with his knee.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ain't much proof in that pudding baby

What so we have some theoretical reports and a bit of controlled test stuff, but what about some of that empirical evidence from, say, PRIDE fights where such things were allowed?

by Pyrgz Krum on Sep 1, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Brock, Jones, or GSP could knee on the ground

people’s necks would break. I completely disagree.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

come on, there's just no data to back that up

knee to a grounded opponent’s head has been done for more than 10 years in Japan and no one’s neck was broken. This is more of an emotional quote than a factual one, I understand people may view it as too violent, but that quote is done emotionally and not factually.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

i’ve seen a hell of a lot of vicious knees to the head on the ground in pride, and nobody’s neck broke. in fact, the guys seem to be in a lot better condition than if they had been KO’d standing.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was a sad day when Mark Coleman killed Igor Vovchanchyn after repeated knees to the head.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

you can say that about a lot of fighters

who gets KO’d by punches too

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

True. I’m not taking a position on the debate. Just saying Igor got fucked up by Coleman in the worst way. It was wild.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just don't see the benefit

vs. the risk. especially for the fighters, and how athletes have developed. Coleman was one of the beefiest HWs back then, and he’d be dwarfed nowadays. Guys like Carwin, Brock, Cain, Duffee, JDS, Gonzaga- monsterous, athletic HWs, could generate UNBELIEVABLE amounts of force with knees.

Think of Overeem’s knees- theyre KO machines on the feet. If he got someone on the ground with them near the eye socket, that person may never see again.

I may be biased- I don’t like ground elbows- but seeing the devastation Bones caused Vera, and the amount of surgeries/ time Vera has had to sit out, I just don’t think these kinds of strikes are worth it given the propensity for injury in the sport anyways.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you’re going to ban knees to the head on the ground for health/safety reasons, you need to ban knees from the Thai clinch, any sort of head kick, unabated hooks and uppercuts, body kicks, foot stomps, etc.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Those can’t jam your spine by hitting you on the crown of your head.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Links to video or stories of fighters getting fucked by knees to the head from the north-south position?

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jesus

Didn’t you fucking bring up the Coleman/Igor fight??

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

what's wrong with him today exactly?

health wise?

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure Vovchanchyn can still feel all four limbs.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, that must mean that move can’t hurt anyone!

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

strikes hurt during fights, this is common in MMA :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t see how it’s consistent to want knees to the head on the ground and not want spike slams. Either allow both or ban both.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

You don’t see the difference between the two?

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel like they’re both banned to protect that part of the body that you need to live. I don’t want Twisters allowed either – the spine is some scary shit and I really don’t want to see someone start convulsing/go and stay limp after a single strike.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re still refusing to engage in legitimate debate and are insisting, instead, on appealing to fear.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

A spike is a strike to the spine. I consider any strike to the top or back of the head – be it from a fist, a knee or gravity – to be too dangerous to allow. Stylistically I’d love them, but health wise I’m against them.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I consider a knee from the Thai clinch too dangerous to allow.

You’re more than welcome to your opinion, but you’ve already established your stance on it. If you want to support your opinion, please provide evidence – of any kind! – instead of repeating it ad nauseam.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I should make it clear that I do not actually find knees from the clinch to be too dangerous for MMA.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

What do you feel is too dangerous for MMA? Everything currently banned but knees to grounded opponents?

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

elbows 12/6

I think is a dumb rule, not everything banned is ‘dangerous’ IMO (though I don’t agree with elbows for a different reason than it being dangerous, but I’m not going to start that debate hehe).

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes. When you listen to the debate about the 12-6 elbow you can hear a certain UFC executive just destroying people about how nonsensical the rule is.

They wanted it and wanted to remove the wrestling shoes. For “hygiene.” No explanation on why the ref wasn’t barefoot as well then.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I always thought

the shoe thing had more to do with cuts though, and unfair advantage for the one striking with the foot? this is what I always thought but never really heard any debates on the matter, if it’s for hygiene only I’m surprised!

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

There may have been other reasons. It was articulated though, that the reason was to reduce dirt and germs and stuff from the bottom of the shoes because guys were rolling on the mats.

Crazy.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

indeed :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that’s an entirely different discussion. I’m not sure I feel like any action in unarmed combat could be “too dangerous.”

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eye gouging?

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel like we’re both operating on hypotheses – you think they’re less dangerous than a spike, I consider them equivalent.

Our opinions have equal evidence (zero) behind them at this point. I’m not willing to institute them and guinea pig-ify UFC fighters to test it out.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

we do have history

on our side of the argument though. years of experience with such move and 0 fatalities nor serious injuries.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mmm, except not really.

I have 10+ years of fights under pro-knee rulesets without any evidence of significantly increased injury risk, for one.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, nobody died in the NFL because of helmet to helmet hits – let’s bring em back!

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

are there no serious injuries created because of that either?

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

We’ll never know how hurt PRIDE fighters were after fights. No AC.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

come on Subo

you’re not answering my question, I know nothing of football (American) so I’ll presume there were serious injuries since you didn’t answer. My only point is that there were 0 fatalities made by knee strikes to grounded opponents and no serious injuries either. Until it has been presented otherwise (if they get a CTscan and see something wrong with them because of knees to the head), then, and only then, can we say ‘yes’ to the matter. As of a right now though, there is no evidence to the contrary, and we shouldn’t just presume things if we have no evidence to the contrary…

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

Let’s wait until someone dies, then ban them.

Again: lack of evidence for one is not evidence for the opposite, and the lack of tragedy doesnt mean tragedy is impossible

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I answered this below

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

And appealing to fear is not a legitimate argument.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know about helmet to helmet, but you shouldn’t get 15 yards for tapping the QB on the head. There are so many stupid rules in the NFL for “safety”.
Knees are good, but stomps are a little much. It’s like the NFL. Helmet to Helmet hits are a little rough once you turn pro, but now they can’t even lead with their shoulder.

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Football changes its rules like every year. All I’m saying is the lack of a tragedy is not evidence that a tragedy is impossible.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

it isn't

but this particular argument began when you said both of our sides of the argument had 0 evidence to support, but we do have years of fighting with such rule and no serious injuries whereas your argument has no evidence to back it up (aside from it being illegal at the moment).

Though the lack of tragedy isn’t evidence that tragedy is impossible, it does support arguments such as ours. I could also say that MMA is safer than boxing, take MMA for the past 20 years with its 1 fatalitiy is enough to support the idea since in boxing there has been various fatalities in the past 20 years. it’s enough to make an argument, but in the end does not prove that MMA is free of fatalities.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who is to say that total wouldn’t be higher with more moves allowed?

It’s not an appeal to fear, though that’s sure where it’s borne from. It’s an assumption, just as the argument that knees on the head are fine is an assumption.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s almost no way to argue that adding knees to the head wouldn’t increase the rate of injury. The question is, how much?

The other question is, is the technique any more dangerous than other techniques currently allowed under the unified rules?

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d argue that you are in fact making an assumption but we aren’t, we do have legit arguments to back up our position, that’s not ‘assumption’ like.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

“Nobody’s died yet” is not a legit argument.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

MMA is NOT safer than boxing

do you agree or disagree with that statement? If you agree with it, I understand your position regarding knees, if you disagree with it, please provide me with an argument to why not?

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's loaded

As I believe MMA as constituted is less dangerous than MMA with knees to the ground allowed. That’s an opinion, as is the opposite.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

MMA should be illegal because someone might die.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Subo, you didn’t answer the question. Mike, my thoughts exactly (using this rational, of course).

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

ha!

I second that :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's what I meant!

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually there is a lot of evidence that the padding used in football has actually made the sport less safe.

by John Nash on Sep 1, 2010 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

spike slams

has more to do with potentially hurting the spine, no one has presented evidence or a good argument on how a knee can potentially do the same harm.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel like it’s pretty simple physics – the thing is designed to be straight and you’re hitting it on the top like a nail. If it can be shown that it’s no more dangerous than a hammerfist, I’m on board, but I consider it spike-esque.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

but look at it like this:

a spike slam is made by picking someone up (usually by their waist) and dropping them head first into the mat. I’m not a good on physics, but I’m sure there is energy going upwards after such a move, that energy is transferred to the spine because it is what holds your head up. A knee to a downed opponent is different, you are striking with your knee to the side of the head (not the back of the head). the energy (much lower than the one made by picking someone up) is the same as the energy made by a knee while standing. If you are worried about a knee to the top of the head, then I can see some logic into your argument, though that can easily be banned as well (just like strikes to the back of the head). most knee strikes on the ground hits the side of the head.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

btw

I’d argue that the most dangerous part about a spike is the potential to land with the back of the head instead of the top of the head (I’m no doctor of course, but I’d imagine that’s much more dangerous).

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the most important point is this: when you spike someone, you are driving all of their weight, a lot of your weight, and the force/leverage of the actual slam onto one precarious part of the body.

A knee to the head on the ground, even to the top of the head, does not generate nearly the same amount of force, and the body has some give.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep

my thoughts as well

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d like to see a Sports Science on that – if MT knees are like car crashes, ground knees are probably pretty brutal, and I don’t want that type of concussive force directed at people’s crowns.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sports Science results are the opposite of evidence.

Hey Pete
R.I.P.

by Grappo on Sep 1, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

But it's on ESPN!

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

There have been hundreds, if not thousands, of fights under rulesets allowing knees to the head of a downed opponent. You’re more than welcome to provide data – statistical, empirical, anecdotal – that suggests that said knee strikes are inherently more dangerous than knees from the Thai clinch, head kicks, etc.

Or you can keep appealing to fear instead.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ll be sure to call some doctors and get some opinions if it ever looks like they’ll be brought back.

Good thing that will never happen in America.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is all I can offer gentlemen....
Q. Since you are one of the doctors on the ABC rules committee, what do you think of knees to the head of a grounded opponent?

A. Once again, blood, cuts and to some extent broken bones are not particularly dangerous, usually cause no long-term dysfunction, and frankly, we are pretty good at handling them. But concussions, more serious closed head injuries and broken necks are another animal all together. This is a sport and should never become a matter of life, death or loss of livelihood.

The quads and glutes are the strongest muscles in the body. When an elite athlete applies these combined forces correctly through the longest, strongest bone in the body — the thigh bone (femur) — devastation is lurking. A grounded opponent is uniquely vulnerable because in certain situations his or her head can be pinned by a knee to the floor or cage with potentially life-altering consequences. Legalizing this “perfect storm” is bad for the sport and even worse for the athletes and their families.

http://mmajunkie.com/news/5056/ask-the-doc-dr-benjamin-on-cauliflower-ear-hand-injuries-and-knee-strikes.mma

Do take this with a grain of salt however, as Johnny is just giving his opinion instead of going to the journals/prior tests etc., like he usually does to get referential information.

by destructivist on Sep 1, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

A grounded opponent is uniquely vulnerable because in certain situations his or her head can be pinned by a knee to the floor or cage with potentially life-altering consequences

what’s funny about this is that it is currently legal to pin someone’s head on the floor using a knee (or a foot), you just can’t strike with it.

I also don’t take this guy very seriously, some of the stuff he wrote regarding whether women should fight 5 rounds fights made me question whether he’s using science or emotion to evaluate his findings.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again, ban the knee from the Thai clinch.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

A kneww from the Thai Clinch

is more destructive than a knee on the ground. It seems counter-intuitive, but it’s the truth. A properly thrown knee in the clinch uses not just your leg and core muscles, but also for you to throw your opponents momentum into the knee itself. Your hands stop the head from being able to move away from it.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again, we will all have to agree to disagree

Until they actually do some sort of tests or trials we will just not be sure. I’m pro knees on the ground, but maybe even if benjamin is to be believed, it would be like the o.g. pride rules where you could only knee a guy that was face up.

by destructivist on Sep 1, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was a sad, sad clown

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Igor was also 30 years old with 39 fights on his ledger.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Given that Overeem was in PRIDE and no one died from a knee, I don’t think any of those guys will be ending anyone’s life if US MMA allowed knees on the ground.

"If a dick don't get hard offa cocaine, what would you axe it?" O.D.B.
"To be is to be the value of a bound variable." W.V.O Quine
"I shoot. I score. He shoots. I score." Dan Gable.

by The Darkness on Sep 1, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think that would make it really more unsafe for fighters : accidents that occured in MMA were in small events with lack of control from doctors.
Control of fighters health matters, more restrictive rules not so much.

by Firm1 on Sep 1, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see no real problem with upkicks on a grounded opponent. Personally, I feel that knees to the head on an opponent who is on one knee or not on his knees but his hands are on the floor should be allowed.

by chrisbboy82 on Sep 1, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, and this could actually happen at some point

Upkicks are great, and even just adding knees/kicks to an opponent attempting a takedown would mix things up well.

And, unlike knees/kicks/stomps to a grounded opponent, this could potentially happen, although probably not until the MMA Wrestlers become even more dominant…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also want to see this. I feel it almost is like a lope-hole in the unified rules, as they are obviously meant to protect a fighter on his back and not these situations originally. It needs to change!

by Horselover Fat on Sep 1, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'mk down with knees on the ground

but not so much stomps or kicks.

I say allow grabbing the fence. I know that for some reason this is an absurd suggestion, but I can’t really think why. The cage is a huge factor in the fight, but it hugely favors the wrestler. They pin guys against it standing, prepping the takedown, and they pin guys against it on the ground. Sure you can use it to try and stuff the TD, or wall-walk back to your feet, but let’s not act like that comes close to evening things out. I’m all for letting fighters grab the fence to avoid the TD or get back to their feet. They shouldn’t be allowed to hold it for more than a couple of seconds at a time though, and only in those situations. You shouldn’t be able to hold the fence to say, steady yourself while throwing strikes.

Hey Pete
R.I.P.

by Grappo on Sep 1, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Knees to the head on the ground might happen (unlikely, but it might). Stomps and soccer kicks on downed opponents – forget it.

You don't like wrestling in MMA? Go watch K-1.

by Monday Morning Martial Artist on Sep 1, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm fine with MMA being a niche sport

If MMA gets as big as the big 3 Ball sports, it’d be come diluted and lose alot of what makes it special. Let the old timers think what they want. They grew up with Boxing and will probably never fully embrace any combat sport outside of it. This isn’t for everyone and never will be. We know how great this sport is, and nothing else should really matter.

Walking the line between intelligence and ignorance since 1985
@deowade

by Damon O. on Sep 1, 2010 11:30 AM EDT reply actions  

They won’t be able to watch PPV in “the home” soon enough anyway.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think the problem is the negative connotations associated with being a niche sport. When I hear niche sport I think of midget tossing and broken glass eating competitions not mma.

by Bandaka on Sep 1, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

If it were bigger we’d probably get bigger fights for free, though?

Goldberg on Leben: One thing's for sure--he really did break that door on the Ultimate Fighter.
Rogan: uh...yeah.

by frosnt1 on Sep 1, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

To become a fan of the sport, someone first has to become a fan of a fighter. After that, the appreciation for the nuances will increase.

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 11:46 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

i agree. for me it was quinton jackson and pride 28. i caught wind of the fight, started watching the promo’s starting reading about rampage, and it was that human element/story that drew me into ordering the pride 28 ppv.

and then the fight was totally awesome.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Sep 1, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

One day I saw a crocop HL and I pooped myself. I started head kicking the sandbag non stop and finally decided to google pride.

I'm a lover not a fighter

by spectaa on Sep 1, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Same here. I saw Cro Cop and I was hooked. Then I discovered Wand and I became a feind

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

For me it was my canadian cousin showing me this fat pudgy guy named fedor destroying these huge muscular guys on fox sports pride fighting championship

by pandaboy99 on Sep 1, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stand-ups actually aren't as unnatural as people think

I’m a fan, so I don’t mind the slow ground game. BUT, the unified MMA rules gives wrestlers a big advantage — namely, that they can’t be punched in the back of the head or spine. This means they can use positions to defend themselves that, in the real world, would not be effective.

At the same time, stand-ups also hurt submission artists. Perhaps the rules could be tweaked slightly to prevent stalemates and grinding wins. At the same time, I think the excitement and dynamism gained from the existence of a ground game far outweighs the downside.

by superflat on Sep 1, 2010 11:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Also, other sports are just as dull

I find it amusing that Mannix doesn’t refer to the lulls that happen in nearly every other sport. Hell, the pauses in a Football game are as long as entire fights. And boxing? I mean, a fight can consist entirely of fighters tying each other up.

If MMA were free, I would rather watch a three hour stream of fights than any other sport at any time, because it’s infinitely more entertaining.

by superflat on Sep 1, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

In basketball, which I find pretty high-paced, players kill the clock all the time, or try only so hard to keep their lead. Of course, these other sports are established with the populace, so it is embedded in people that this is the norm and part of the game.

by chrisbboy82 on Sep 1, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yah but think pre 24 sec clock… people would kill the clock the entire game and the game was about passing and defense. Sure some people enjoyed that aspect of the game. But it needed to be changed because the sport was too boring!

by pandaboy99 on Sep 1, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are changes in every sport that take place for one reason: ENTERTAINMENT

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually wrote a FanPost here about the Florian vs Maynard fight and how I found it to be “lay n pray” utilized by Gray maynard. Are you implying that the rules should be changed so that fighters who have top position but do nothing but little ground n pound and just lie on their opponent won’t have such an advantage, and it wouldn’t be so “boring?”

by chrisbboy82 on Sep 1, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

In the Maynard Kenny case, that fight was boring because Kenny sucked and did not fight with a sense of urgency

by pandaboy99 on Sep 1, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also what if kenny was throwing submission after submission from the bottom would he then be winning the fight? Judges say no

by pandaboy99 on Sep 1, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

This. Octagon control is so stupid.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 1, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Octagon control is not well defined and nothing that can’t be well defined should be a part of judging criteria. Was Andre Winner being controlled by being pushed against the cage or was he controlling where the fight was by not being taken down for a sustained period (in rounds 1 and 2 obviously)

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

It goes back to the 1st Machida fight. Peoples claimed that although Machida was backing up, he was controlling the pace of the fight. That’s true in a way and it’s not hard at all to argue the opposite.

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s stupid for sure. Either they give it better definition, or they get rid of it altogether.

by pud333 on Sep 1, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

We need yellow cards #1.
  1. If the scoring criteria was changed and laying on top of a guy in combination with yellow cards caused grinders to lose decisions, that’s when we will see people try to finish fights.

Perfect example was gray maynards last fight. If he had gotten a couple yellow cards and lost a round or two then he would either have to pick up the pace or face losing/drawing to kenny on points.

by destructivist on Sep 1, 2010 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

+1 for yellow cards

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

  I like that idea, but I can see a wave of controversy following a suspect yellow card.

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's up to interpretation

referees already have that power in stopping fights, human error is always going to be a factor but it should improve the problem.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

We're never going to have the best refs across the board.

But if it was written into the rules properly it would not be hard to interpret. ie., write the rules to say that if a fighter in inactive in a non-advantaged position its up to the ref to issue a yellow card. advantaged positions are defined as:side control,mount, etc.,

This way its pretty clear cut by the UFC’s rules that just laying in guard, clinching excessively, and so on would become fair game for yellow cards.

by destructivist on Sep 1, 2010 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

true

I’m all for giving it clear specifics as a term such as ‘inactivity’ is just too general. they are already making these kinds of calls to stand fighters up, so they should make those types of specifics even if they don’t adopt the yellow cards.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Any sort of yellow card that costs a fighter a point or a dime of their fight purse...

would be fucking horrific.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

refs

can already take points away from fighters, and the money thing is an incentive to fight (if they aren’t doing what they are being paid to do)

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

yellow cards are also used for rule violations

but my point is that it’s their interpretations of the ‘rule violation’ that gives them the right to take a point away, it would still be under their interpretation to do it for something else such as non-commitment to fight (if that rule was implemented of course).

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 2, 2010 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

The refs could start using cattle prods.

by Bandaka on Sep 1, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I look at other sports and compare and I still contend that MMA is still missing rules to make it the most complete fighting sport. We are still in a “pre 24 shot clock era”.

Then again look at baseball.. boring as hell but noone complains because most of the fan base are educated. Nobody boos at a baseball game because there were no homeruns hit in a game.

by pandaboy99 on Sep 1, 2010 11:55 AM EDT reply actions  

I think there needs to be more done for judging criteria before anything else gets changed. So many bozos have no clue once that fight hits the mat.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I say use the ‘Shogun’ criteria, get rid of boxing judges and use retired fighters and referees from MMA. but then again it would be up to the commissions to endorse this so we might as well forget about it :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think a huge problem is the fact that stand ups are just too subjective. Each ref will stand fighters at different times. There needs to be criteria when to stand or when not to stand, not just some arbitrary judgement call from a ref.

by pandaboy99 on Sep 1, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

So what would be a fairly simple and easy to implement (Read: No Athletic Commission approval needed) way to increase the likelihood of fighters going for the finish instead of trying to eek out a UD win? Use large FINISH bonuses instead of simply win bonuses. Still have win bonuses, but have finish bonuses that are several times the size of the win bonus. This would still not completely eliminate the problem, especially for guys who are either in, or fighting to be in a championship fight, as well as those who have no other way to win other than grinding out a UD.

This could be further improved by having contingent top contender fights. In other words, using the Rampage – Evans as an example, instead of making it an automatic contender fight, Dana White could have told them “if you win via a finish, of whatever variety, you get an automatic title shot…if you win via decision, well, it will depend on how you fought as well as whether you won…we’ll see”

Implement some things like these almost immediately, and then look to rules changes if further improvement is needed.

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

No offense intended my firend
"if you win via a finish, of whatever variety, you get an automatic title shot…if you win via decision, well, it will depend on how you fought as well as whether you won…we’ll see"

But this is a horrible idea.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein"
- Goonisis

by Goonisis on Sep 1, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

None taken, but

Part of the problem with automatic title shot fights being so incredibly conservative for the most part is because fighting for the safest possible W is the smart business decision for the fighters to make in that situation – this would mix that up a bit.

How different would Fitch-Alves, Maynard-Florian or Rashad-Rampage have looked if this were the criteria?

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good ideas. It clearly is within the UFC’s power to start implementing incentives like this. They could also start giving out more than one KO of the night and submission of the night award. If they wanted to mix things up they could award a separate fight of the night bonus, e.g., to whatever fighters the fans selected by texting or however they wanted to do it.

"If a dick don't get hard offa cocaine, what would you axe it?" O.D.B.
"To be is to be the value of a bound variable." W.V.O Quine
"I shoot. I score. He shoots. I score." Dan Gable.

by The Darkness on Sep 1, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

So the guy's 34...

…and he hasn’t watched it much. I can’t comprehend American Football (I’m English) so the only good bits to me are the bits where they run into each other head-on, or when someone does a flip over a defender. I’m aware that there’s massive tactics and subtlety to it – but I haven’t watched enough of it to grasp it, so I find it tedious.

The thing making a difference in MMA won’t be sportswriters – it’ll be the fans who saw TUF and tune in to watch knockouts, but are slowly being educated by Rogan and the other commentators. As more and more people start to understand what’s going on, any self-proclaimed sportswriter who doesn’t is going to look like an idiot.

Side note: the reason Fitch/Maynard fights are boring is because you understand what they’re doing. They’re getting to guard/half guard and landing just enough shots that the ref feels bad about standing them up. They aren’t trying to finish the fight.

by CaptainArmbar on Sep 1, 2010 11:57 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Absolutely

Spot on.
 Also, my friends who don’t watch, simply make “Junkyard Dog” and “Undertaker” jokes about MMA. The more you try to defend it or explain the sport, the more you sound like a 10 year old trying to convince your older brother that Pro Wrestling is real. And part of this is due to the lack of mainstream media coverage. You don’t see results of a “super match” anywhere but the ghetto sections of the sports sites online, or an AP blurb anywhere else if we’re lucky.

by Dootch on Sep 1, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Say what you mean John.

Sports Writers on UFC 118: Mainstream Breakdowns Show Why UFC MMA Is a Niche Promotion Sport

Guillotine.

by iiowyn on Sep 1, 2010 12:03 PM EDT reply actions  

This is illogical and not well researched

First of all if you want to be even close to right you need to lead in with the caveat “in the America…” Because. for instance, in Canada MMA is already mainstream. On WEC/UFC fight nights, highlights of the fights usually lead off the show/are in the first few minutes of our various versions of Sportscenter. the UFC prelims are not only on spike here but on a major sports network, as are the UFC on versus shows and Bellator. Think MMAlive, but two different versions during primetime on two of the major sports networks. Everyone knows who GSP is, etc etc etc. I can go on. For 34+ million people, MMA is mainstream.

Then the even bigger problem is using crusty old sports reporters as your barometer. Right now, assuming the viewing party and bar numbers are close to accurate (and if i’m recalling all the numbers correctly), more people watch a UFC then do so some NBA or MLB playoff games. No ones opinions is gonna change that.

Don’t get me wrong, MMA has a long way to go to be a truly mainstream sport in much of the world, but for all the cries of “boring” or “barbaric”, the numbers tell teh story of a UFC show watched by millions and new fans being made time and time again. For a sport in it’s infancy, MMA is in much better shape then most others were.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein"
- Goonisis

by Goonisis on Sep 1, 2010 12:05 PM EDT reply actions  

I make no apologies for the lousy wording, grammar and spelling.

It was a long night…

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein"
- Goonisis

by Goonisis on Sep 1, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Population US: 307,006,550
Population Canada: 33,311,400
Population State of California: 36,961,664

GDP (from CIA factbook) millions of USD
GDP US: 14,260,000
GDP Canada: 1,336,000
GDP California: 1,800,000

by who me on Sep 1, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Point being?

Canada is one of the largest economies in the world and MAA is mainstream here. That’s a refutation to the articles point, no? Maybe i’m using my rose-tinted glasses here, but the picture isn’t nearly as bleak as Snowden paints it.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein"
- Goonisis

by Goonisis on Sep 1, 2010 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Compared to the US, Canada is a small fraction of the population and economy thus the reason that the caveat of saying “in the US” is not neccessary. Canada as a nation has about the same GDP as Texas. The fact that MMA is more established in Canada is a footnote not an actual point against this article. Of course I didn’t see where this article was bleak at all, it was realistic as to where the sport stands currently.

by who me on Sep 1, 2010 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, there is some MMA on almost every night up here and lots of MMA news shows.

Plus the score has started airing Canadian MMA events. It is a lot of fun.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

The “boring” problem isn’t a problem. The problem is that people don’t get it. Football is a bunch of dudes throwing a ball to each other, running around, and occasionally getting jumped on. It’s boring if you don’t get it. If (when) MMA gains a loyal fanbase, it’s not going to be boring.

And violence? Pfft. There is nothing more magnetic than violence.

"You hear people say, 'You're the greatest,' and all this stuff. It's BS. It's fake, it's all fake. You've just got to keep training as hard as you can. The only thing real is the fight, everything else is fake." - BJ Penn

by crazybones on Sep 1, 2010 12:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Its simply a matter of education

What irks me about the ‘mainstream media’ is the pure lack of education on the sport – Bob Ryan has a wealth of knowledge on baseball, football, and basketball, but brings absolutely ZERO to the table when covering MMA.

When I spent some time in Europe and asked the barkeep to put on the NFL, the patrons mocked this ‘stupid American game’ that started/stopped seemingly every 15 seconds… the Irish hated American football simply because they had no idea what they were watching, the skillset involved, the goal of the game, etc.

Comparing MMA to a barroom brawl proves that Ryan has never really experienced either one, seeing a barroom brawl is typically filed with overweight drunks who wouldnt last 10 seconds inside the cage with anyone of these elite athletes…

"Every day gets better for me, you know what I'm saying? If anyone has a chance to beat me, it was yesterday..." - Kevin Ferguson

by bloodsportmmadotcom on Sep 1, 2010 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I was surprised by this one...
Frankly, after watching an evening of UFC, up close and personal, I came away with a better appreciation of boxing.

I thought the Diaz / Davis fight and the Penn / Edgar fight were great examples of striking in MMA. The rest of the card wasn’t the most exciting, but I was surprised the boxing people had that much negative feedback given those two fights.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 12:33 PM EDT reply actions  

they don't like the way they strike

they don’t like their stance/base etc (which is understandable because it is MMA). most of the hardcore boxing fans are a lost hope IMO

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

no doubt :p

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Give us a chance!

I’m a longtime boxing competitor, and it wasn’t until I started training at an MMA gym that I began to appreciate the difference in stance and base for MMA striking. I admit, I just thought they were bad boxers, but now I understand and appreciate the intracacies. Also, Frankie Edgar is great to watch for boxers because he moves in and out, gives boxing-style angles, moves his head and throws good combinations.

by Jay Smith on Sep 1, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

welcome onboard friend :p

and I did mean most of hardcore boxing fans, but I’m sure there are plenty of hardcores who are well informed just like you.

the following two things are signs of weaknesses:
stay silent when it's needed to speak up, and speak up when it's needed to stay silent.

by Orcus on Sep 1, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

My thoughts on it...

I love combat sports, and I love MMA, but I’m always going to prefer a boxing match, or a muay thai match, or even a BJJ tournament. For me, the problem with MMA is that styles clash fairly often, and sometimes it doesn’t end up looking as good as it does when both fighters are on the same page, competing in the same style. It’s also what makes MMA so fun and unpredictable, but I do understand what Bob Ryan means here.

by Jay Smith on Sep 1, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fuck the media

I don’t give the spelling lessons, they should stay away from my sport.

End of story.

Por isso eu tomo ópio / é um remédio / sou um convalescente do momento / moro no rés-do-chão do pensamento / e ver passar a vida faz-me tédio

by Gremio on Sep 1, 2010 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

But I’m sure if they’d all written positive pieces you’d be all for it…

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

*them

hahahaha

Por isso eu tomo ópio / é um remédio / sou um convalescente do momento / moro no rés-do-chão do pensamento / e ver passar a vida faz-me tédio

by Gremio on Sep 1, 2010 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Dinosaurs like Ryan and Kornheiser will never embrace MMA, and neither will the majority of the American male population that remembers boxing’s heyday. However, to put it bluntly, the numbers of the recalcitrant and conservative that are that old are thinning every day.

This is a long term project, the sport is already larger than anyone ever anticipated, and we haven’t hit the ceiling yet.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Really? At what point in the last decade did you consider a 1.6 million PPV event?

Scratch that, actually – how about back to back years setting the annual PPV sales record? Who thought that was possible in even 2006?

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

When Zuffa bought the UFC, expectations were enormous. It was a shock to them that it didn’t explode right away. And, frankly, PPV is small potatoes. It’s super that they are doing so well, but the position on pay tv is indicative of the sport’s niche status. It’s not the best of all potential outcomes.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

So until they’re on a network, they’re niche? I completely reject that notion. Unless boxing was never anything because they didn’t put on marquee fights for free all the time.

I mean, beating the WWE in PPVs? Besting boxing’s best years and then expanding on that success the very next year? I’m wowed. I’m in awe. I had never even heard of this shit a few years ago and now here I am, debating THE Jonathan Snowden. Life’s been berry berry good to me.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

NBC, ABC, ESPN…all carried high level massive title fights.

Not really taking one side or the other but just wanted to be clear that the pay-per-view model was not always that important to boxing.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

But then again people do think that the only fighters the public ever cared about in boxing were heavyweights.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

They weren't the only ones

that people cared about, but the HW’s have always been the marquee titles…i.e., based on the axiom that a good big man beats a good smaller man, and therefore the HW Champ is “The Baddest Man On The Planet”.

by Dootch on Sep 1, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Dana said it best

Boxing lost some of its popularity once it went pretty much exclusively pay.

The UFC hopefully gets a network TV deal soon and Dana doesn’t decide that the “stacked” main event is sort of like Spencer Fisher vs. Sam Stout on Spike but instead a Rampage vs. Machida type of fight.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 1, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d like to see them do an end around the TV networks and put it up live on the internet.

by jrobb20 on Sep 1, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Until HD streaming to your TV is widely available

This isn’t a great option, because my 55 inch HD tv pones my 15 inch laptop screen.

by SES 84 on Sep 1, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

It would be interesting if they could have a free stream that had advertisements during the walk-ins, between rounds, etc… And still have the same PPV option for people like you and me that love our HD. Hell, half of the world is streaming it free any way.

by jrobb20 on Sep 1, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've widely speculated on this

The UFC should really have something like a $100 a year online UFC subscription with access to hd videos say 24 hours after the fight and then some sort of lower quality online stream.

We can argue about the price point, but I think a ton of people are stealing streams/videos who could be persuaded to get a mid tier option for when they don’t have a viewing party put together.

I have heard the PPV contract prevents this, but I think the UFC could have a better pricing structure. a la itunes moving to a la carte pricing as opposed to having to buy a whole album.

by SES 84 on Sep 1, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

One thing that has to be mentioned is that this is the age of the Internet. I think it’s no coincidence that mma has taken off at the same time as the Internet. You don’t have to have ESPN to be successful. As time goes on and technology advances reliance on traditional media only becomes less necessary. The Bob Ryans are not going to be replaced with new columnists at print media outlets. They are being replaced with the Luke Thomas’ on the internet. Luke still uses a traditional radio station for his radio show, but, how long until that takes place solely on the Internet?

The age of the Internet is the age of the niche. I wonder if there will be a new NFL of any kind. People can find whatever they want on the Internet. To the extent they can’t they can create it without having to kiss the ring of the all mighty federal government. At. Least as it is today. But that’s another topic.

by jrobb20 on Sep 1, 2010 1:17 PM EDT reply actions  

As it stands today i certainly agree. I just don’t see tomorrows legends coming into existence through the same few career paths that today’s legends have.

by jrobb20 on Sep 1, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bill Simmons

He is the internet age’s Bob Ryan…Same maybe for a guy like Will Leach of Deadspin fame at least at the moment. I think there are other guys emerging too. Aaron Schatz for Football analysis.

by SES 84 on Sep 1, 2010 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

True

When I wrote that I was really thinking…Not the same thing, but more just showing that you can create a pretty big following just on the internet and then move that into other media. The internet is really even to degree what made James famous outside of small circles.

by SES 84 on Sep 1, 2010 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Bob

But he’s just another guy wistfully wishing for boxing’s golden years. He or Kornheiser talking MMA is just painful to listen to – like hearing a guy whose wife left him call every new woman ugly.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kornheiser is not as bad as Wilbon

Who is anti-MMA to the maximum.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 1, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wilbon is a contemptible moron

I can live without him.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

And that speaks to my larger point I was trying to make at the beginning of this thread. Because of the internet we don’t have too. Forget Wilbon, Kornheiser and Ryan. I’ll go to the BE site. After an event I check out the internet for interviews and post fight analysis. 20 years ago that was impossible. What will it be like 20 years from now? Who knows but technological advances only speed up, they don’t slow down.

I’ve spend the last 13 years moving the traditional print company I work for to an electronic business. As every day passes the necessity of having the mainstream media on your side decreases. It’s going to be a while before it’s not necessary, but, make no mistake it’s coming.

by jrobb20 on Sep 1, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Furthering my point. 50 years ago you wrote at your school paper. Went to college. (maybe) Interned for your local paper. Worked your way from market to market climbing the ladder.

20 years ago you were on your schools news channel. (Boom goes the dynamite) Went to college. (most likely) Interned for your local news station. Worked your way from market to market climbing the ladder.

You can still do those things today, but, there are other paths now. Historically if you didn’t choose one of the paths above you weren’t going to be in the business. Now with the internet you can forge your own path and cut out the middle man. Things don’t change on a dime, but, they do change. They are definitely moving away from traditional corporate controlled media to small entity media. I don’t think one can properly discuss the future of a relatively new sport and it’s growth without considering the impact of the new media.

by jrobb20 on Sep 1, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really couldn't care less what those old farts have to say

And unfortunately 118 badly needed Rivera/Sakara and Marquardt/Palhares. Basically Rivera/Sakara was a guaranteed KO and Marquardt/Palhares could result in limb loss.

Definitely better than Winner/Lentz or Maia/Miranda.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 1, 2010 1:18 PM EDT reply actions  

MMA will never be as big as the major mainstream sports

simply because it is a combat sport. I really believe there is a ceiling for combat sports, because fighting is just something that a percentage of the population will never embrace. They simply look at it as violence and they will never accept it. Add this to the fact that plenty of people, including many casual fans, don’t appreciate the ground game and think it’s boring. Will MMA get bigger? Sure. There’s plenty of room for growth, but I sincerely doubt it’ll ever reach the heights Dana White wants it to. Getting an appreciation for a touchdown is not the same as getting an appreciation for how one dude punches another dude in the face. Not by a long shot. To many people, it’s just not digestable.

by pud333 on Sep 1, 2010 1:31 PM EDT reply actions  

The scheduling of Machida/Rampage in Michigan is instructive. If the only goals were gate, PPV sales and revenue, that fight would never ever ever be in Michigan. But spurring interest and creating new fans in virgin territories is a long term strategy aimed at eclipsing where we already are.

If you haven’t noticed yet, I think the UFC’s mix on events, promotion, marketing, fight making and (yes, manufactured and actual) controversy is absolutely brilliant.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

there'll be something up about that at around 3

…from me, BE’s Michigan resident

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, Flintoid now living in Nashville. When did this Michgianian term come about? (Always reading that in the Detroit News) It was always Michigander when I grew up.

by jrobb20 on Sep 1, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Michigander is what I’ve always heard too.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great minds think alike

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I read a lot of comments but not all, so apologies if I’m bringing up a point someone already made. I think the main point is that you need to have an appreciation for several disciplines to really understand MMA… and even most of us hardcore fans aren’t there yet, which makes it unreasonable to expect casual viewers to have such an appreciation. How much do we hear MMA fans (including me, on occasion) complaining that the five-minute round was boring, LnP wrestling for position and to edge out a decision win? If we feel that way, try to imagine what a non-fan thinks when they see the same thing.

I think a good step for the UFC would be to put together a TV show focusing on all the various disciplines. Maybe not Human Weapon or Target or whatever it is that Jason Chambers used to host, but something that really focuses on each discipline and then points out how it can – or can’t – be successful in MMA (eg. traditional boxing stance will get you taken down like Randy did to Toney, and Randy even said at the post-fight press conference that you can’t pull that against anyone who has a basic knowledge of MMA).

This is one of the few things that Strikeforce has done right… they try to break down at least some of the elements of MMA to educate viewers.

I’m not a big sports fan, even combat sports. For instance, I always found boxing to be boring. And I really hate seeing MMA matches that are nothing but shitty kickboxing (i.e. sloppy technique).

One of the big assets that Joe Rogan brings to UFC broadcasts is his knowledge and excitement about the ground game, but that’s obviously not enough for non-fans and non-MMA sports journalists.

All that being said, there’s real potential for a “Disciplines of MMA” show on something like ESPN or A&E, though it could obviously be on Spike or Versus if needed. Remember how people became amazed with BJJ after Royce and UFC 1? Zuffa can do something similar with wrestling, Muay Thai, boxing, more BJJ, Kyokushin karate, judo, hell… get Machida up there with some sumo and show it’s not just for fat bastards. Educate us about techniques, show some selective (exciting) showcase fights from a discipline. Maybe even occasionally broadcast something live like the ADCC finals.

I guess most of this comes down to marketing… don’t expect them to come to your product… instead, find a way to make the product reach them. Educating viewers so that they can develop an appreciation for the sport is much more likely to bring new people in than bitching about them being idiots and TUF (or, now, post-TUF) noobs.

by mma_critic on Sep 1, 2010 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

It's also about the presentation

I’m a big fan of mma but jesus when the UFC intro hits the screen I can’t help but feel I’m too old for this shit. Cheesy mall core metal, flames etc… Luckily it all still gets better when the fights starts.

by IronMonkey13 on Sep 1, 2010 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

I hate the Gladiator intro

I’d love it if they would do sort of a sci-fi sort of thing. BROCKLESNARCYCLOPS!

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 1, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I get that the gladiator intro is a part of "the package"

but man…it gets laughed at almost every time I have someone watch a UFC for the first time with me.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

MMA is a lot like baseball. To really appreciate its intracies requires a lot of time and effort.

The difference is that baseball is often enjoyed by people who don’t want to invest that time and effort, whereas the direction MMA is going tends to alienate those fans.

American football and basketball don’t really have intricacies to learn (indeed, the NFL doesn’t want you to learn the intricacies of the sport – if they’d did they make their rulebook freely available like MLB does)

Really, if there’s another sport like MMA that attracts fans who want to learn all about it, but alienates those who don’t, it’s Formula One. F1 fans know an absurd amount about the technical details of those cars and all the arcane rules that govern them (this is a sport that has hearings to determine what the difference is between a hole and an edge), much as MMA fans know exactly where not to place your hand when in someone’s guard.

I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.

by Llewdor on Sep 1, 2010 1:52 PM EDT reply actions  

"Racing? But it's boring"

People say it’s not a sport, it’s unathletic (I hear that on this board whenever it’s mentioned), it’s boring, blah blah. Again, people who don’t know the intricacies, the skill involved. And I’m not talking about just Formula One, also Rally drivers, motocross, and other variations at the top levels

by Dootch on Sep 1, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

The difference is that baseball is often enjoyed by people who don’t want to invest that time and effort, whereas the direction MMA is going tends to alienate those fans.

The real difference is a fucklot of time and the fact that many American males grow up playing baseball.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

*or learning the rules in gym.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can people stop using baseball as some sort of comparison? They aren’t remotely analogous even in the context they’re being framed in.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 1:53 PM EDT reply actions  

How about this. Bob Ryan finds MMA boring but probably enjoys a 4 hour 1-0 1 hit shutout.

by jrobb20 on Sep 1, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doesn’t really mean anything.

by Mike Fagan on Sep 1, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

right..

as I said above. It’s a sport with tons more cultural currency, guys grow up playing it, you’re taught it in gym class..it’s not a comparable activity at all.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

So what defines “mainstream sport”? For that matter, what defines “mainstream” media?

Sergio Non,
MMA writer, USA TODAY
http://mma.usatoday.com

by Sergio Non on Sep 1, 2010 1:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Mainstream = on the East Coast and has worked for a newspaper since the Nixon Administration
Fringe = everyone else

It’s like those propagating the definition benefit from it! Weird!

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I mean, be reasonable...

Without waxing too philosophically, it’s pretty difficult to come up with any definition of “mainstream sport” that would include MMA. Viewership, individual name recognition, any of those things are going to leave MMA (and boxing, for that matter) behind. I like this article because it says who cares, let’s just enjoy MMA ourselves and not frustrate ourselves by trying way too hard to make other people understand or like it.

by Jay Smith on Sep 1, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Viewership, individual name recognition, any of those things are going to leave MMA (and boxing, for that matter) behind.

I wouldn’t be so sure about that. Check out estimates of Fanhouse’s various sports sections:

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/mmafighting.com+golf.fanhouse.com+nhl.fanhouse.com+motorsports.fanhouse.com/#

On a related note — when your sport is covered on a regular basis by every national sports network and the most widely distributed U.S. newspaper, are you really out of the mainstream?

Sergio Non,
MMA writer, USA TODAY
http://mma.usatoday.com

by Sergio Non on Sep 1, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting...

but I’d be wary about taking too much away from that statistic… Also, I wouldn’t say that MMA is completely out of the mainstream, but no way you can honestly call it a mainstream sport (see Jonathan’s comprehensive definition below).

by Jay Smith on Sep 1, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, that’s way less than I imagined mmafighting’s traffic would be. We aren’t that far behind the game, at least weren’t until they blew up earlier in the year. Of course we have zero full timers and they have four.

I respect you a lot, but I know you aren’t trying to pass off the very occasional MMA piece in your paper to the volumes of baseball/football/basketball/golf/tennis/racing/hockey that are produced daily when those sports are in season?

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Aw, I’m hurt. “Very occasional”? j/k. But a few serious points:

  • The print edition is not our only product, and will not be the most important product going forward.

We’re a top-10 news website, and as it so happens, mixed martial arts gets far more frequent USAT staff coverage online than tennis, golf, hockey or racing. MMA has a community page of its own with a dedicated blogger, something that is only true for four other sports: football; baseball; college football and college basketball (which actually share the same community).

  • For the last few months, the newspaper has run an MMA piece every Thursday or Friday, and for some few cards, we’ve done multiple stories in bonus sections published in our sports section ahead of pay-per-view shows.
  • In July, the month of the Wimbledon finals, the newspaper ran more stories about MMA than tennis.
  • Compete.com undercounts usatoday.com’s traffic, which makes me wonder if it’s also doing it for other sites. In other words, I have a sneaking suspicion that MMA Fighting’s traffic is actually higher than what the above graph shows.

Sergio Non,
MMA writer, USA TODAY
http://mma.usatoday.com

by Sergio Non on Sep 1, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m sure the traffic is higher than that site reflects. But whether that is a financially viable site is a significant question.

I appreciate the coverage you are giving the sport. You do the best work of anyone in the mainstream print media. It’s great having a real fan in your spot. I will have to look out for the print coverage. I’ve been lucky enough to stay in hotels recently that are classy enough to give out the WSJ instead of the USAT. ;)

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

OUCH! Just twist the knife a little further, why don’t you?

That said, I do think the WSJ is missing out by not covering MMA in its new and expanded sports section online. They even have a writer on staff who’s already familiar with the sport — Ross Schneiderman used to write the NY Times’ MMA pieces.

Sergio Non,
MMA writer, USA TODAY
http://mma.usatoday.com

by Sergio Non on Sep 2, 2010 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

And after that he got familiar with MMA?

See what I did?

At what point do you see an entity like the WSJ simply importing someone to do their MMA coverage. It’s worked very well for SI with Josh Gross and ESPN with Jake Rossen. Instead of using a staffer with a passing familiarity, why not buy Bloody Elbow or MMA Weekly?

WSJ may be able to reach out to a casual audience. But if you try to attract actual MMA fans with someone that doesn’t really, really know their stuff – you are going to be in serious trouble.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 2, 2010 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

A mainstream sport is one most Americans are:

A. Comfortable with
B. Familiar with the rules, even if they aren’t participants
C. Is covered regularly by the national media and available widely on television, generally free television
D. Has tens of millions of fans
E. Kids grow up playing

Of course it varies by culture. For example, soccer, biking and Formula One are mainstream sports in Europe. Not so here.

A mainstream sport has the audience and the revenue the UFC lacks. Look at Nascar- on the fringe of mainstream. The UFC could promote UFC 100 every week for a calendar year and not touch Nascar’s revenue. That’s mainstream – it’s of interest to a wide audience.

The mainstream media represents the national press. Typically this is traditional media in its traditional forms: television, syndicated or national radio, and print. I suppose this also includes some of the larger international websites like Yahoo and AOL, especially as they seek out and hire established, veteran reporters and commentators.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t you see progress?

My ESPN iPod app has an MMA section right next to the Big Four.

Yahoo has a partnership with Zuffa to sell PPV’s.

The Boston Globe sent Bob Ryan to cover a UFC card.

I see a lot of ground behind us and a lot of ground in front of us. What I don’t see are insurmountable odds.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course I see progress. It’s in the article:


We are past the point where most sports writers and critics are calling for the sport to be banned. Everyone recognizes the UFC’s tremendous economic success. Now the sport faces an even larger hurdle: aesthetic tastes.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

What a surprise, some unathletic old dude doesn’t like MMA.

by DirtyML on Sep 1, 2010 1:56 PM EDT reply actions  

This is really just all Nik Lentz’s fault.

by Syd O on Sep 1, 2010 1:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah

They should have METINTHEMIDDLEANDBANGED

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah nah

It’s definitely Kid Nate.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 1, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not a matter of education, it’s a matter of how MMA (more particularly “Ultimate Fighting”) is presented to new comers. If your going to sell this “as real as it gets” sport, I doubt you’d be enticing people with a highlight package of Fitch, Maynard, and Rashad’s ground game. You’d be showing Shad KO Lidell, a Rampage powerbomb or two and Wand’s screaming face. Comparing the action to any other sport is irrelevant as the sport itself is marketed as action more so than a sport. When we get the feeling that a guy stalled to win instead of risking advancing his position to dominate a guy, we fell let down. Nothing will change that, unless the refs start standing up guys after 30 seconds of not attempting to go for a sub or mount.

by medium seen on Sep 1, 2010 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

MMA is a niche sport. Football fans call it barbaric and I just laugh. Boxing fans call it boring and I scratch my head.

There are a lot of problems with perception of the sport but the UFC is promoting it well. I’m not saying they couldn’t do it better and I’m not saying they are doing it alone.

I see progress every time some MMA personality or fighter is on ESPN or a morning talk show. There are only so many people that will every watch it and fewer that will be actual fans. The competition has the public school system on their side.

Posting in spite of Snowden.

by Rufford on Sep 1, 2010 2:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Reading quotes from ‘respected’ sports writers really puts our sport’s standing in perspective. We’ve matured through infancy, but we’re still not allowed to sit at the grown up table. MMA is still covered as a spectacle. The actual event and those participating in it play second fiddle to the spector of “two warriors fighting to the death in the cage”, which sadly isn’t far from how mainstream sports writers view our sport.

There’s a large number of sports writers, young and old, clinging to the “I’m a boxing guy” argument that holds little to no weight. Sure, you may find boxing more entertaining, but to ignore the UFC explosion is purely bad journalism. There’s no excuse for writers in the next ten years to cover this sport seriously. These guys are currently getting away with, and being proud of, having little to no knowledge about a movement that is growing faster than they can imagine.

by Danny Glover on Sep 1, 2010 2:55 PM EDT reply actions  

It's not bad journalism...

if your argument is that because the sport is growing the major papers and media need to cover it….that shouldn’t mean forcing guys who don’t “get it” to try to develop some level of knowledge about it. It should be getting guys involved who do.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree that I’d rather have a Jay Glazer covering an event than say, Michael Wilbon, but I see this as an evolve or die situation. These guys can continue to argue that our sport is hard to watch, barbaric, gay, whatever. They cling to boxing as the pure combat sport, while it dies in their hands.

by Danny Glover on Sep 1, 2010 3:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Why you gotta go all anti-boxing?

Boxing, muay thai, BJJ are all pure combat sports, and I personally enjoy them slightly more than I enjoy MMA. But that’s a different argument that I hate having because I love MMA and I love all combat sports. I’m fine with MMA and boxing being niche sports, but if you aren’t, you might have to get ready to consider what those guys are saying (the guys that call MMA boring, barbaric, gay, etc.). Those are your potential “mainstream” fans.

by Jay Smith on Sep 1, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy and appreciate boxing. My opinion is that these ‘old school’ writers latch onto boxing, proclaiming it a ‘true’ combat sport. My feeling is that it’s easier for these guys to hold onto something from the past than it is for them to actually learn anything relevant about MMA.

by Danny Glover on Sep 1, 2010 3:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not caring about MMA is likely never to be a death sentence for a writer.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Sep 1, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well it should be Brent, it should be!

by Danny Glover on Sep 1, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

First, I loved you in Color Purple...

Second, I agree.. why does Bob Ryan have to cover MMA? He would just cover it badly and we would be upset. The “I’m a boxing guy” argument seemed to have more to do with enjoyment of the sport and not willingness to cover the sport. In fact, my guess is Bob Ryan spends little to no time covering either MMA or boxing.

by Jay Smith on Sep 1, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Screw that. Lethal Weapon for the win!

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah right...

Lethal weapon is gay, hard to watch, and barbaric. I’m a Color Purple purist.

by Jay Smith on Sep 1, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hahahaha. Rec'd.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 1, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m getting to old for this shit

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

WHERE ARE YOU RIGGS! Thanks for getting it guys.

by Danny Glover on Sep 1, 2010 3:31 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Do people still think UFC (MMA in general) will ever be accepted by mainstream? It’s not even fully sanctioned yet! Hell, it ain’t even a ‘pure’ sport. There will always be people calling it gay, stupid, barbaric, ect… It doesn’t bother me… they have their own opinions and I have mine.

by jjhh05 on Sep 1, 2010 9:16 PM EDT reply actions  

...

“And as much as we hate to admit it, MMA may never stand side by side with football and basketball as a mainstream entity.”

Anyone who hasn’t already accepted this needs to stop living in the clouds. This sport is based around punching and kicking other men in the head for gods sake.

imo the best we can hope for is what we have now with a few select fighters who really get the general public interested (ala mayweather and pac).

by moreofmyself on Sep 2, 2010 2:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Walshrun_small
5 Reasons I Hate MMA
Royce_09_small
Call To Nominate New Bloody Elbow Moderators
Obp_small
The Official BE UFC Drinking Game
Jules-winfield-7_small
5 Reasons I Hate the UFC
Small
Pushing Nick Diaz - A Study in Match Making

Recent FanPosts

Afro_small
The UFC Has Been Spared Once Again...This Time by Carlos Condit
Small
Suddenly Diego Sanchez vs. Jake Ellenberger Meas A LOT
Thumbnailca0h0gv2_small
Difference Between TRT & THC
Image_small
Nick Diaz is a Rebel and He Doesn't Give a Shit.
Chinese-hong-kong-large-flag-hk_small
Barboza, Thompson, eat your heart out (now with 2 Tornado Kick KOs!)
Elty_small
Why An Immediate Rematch with Nick Diaz is the BEST Career Move for Carlos Condit
Small
Why Diaz vs. Condit 2 is a great idea
Eastbound-n-down-kenny-powers_small
Rumor: Nick Diaz is going to Fail Drug Test

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings