Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

Last Word on BJ Penn: Tiers, Hall of Fame, and What Might Have Been

BJ Penn Hughes 63

Our BJ Penn discussion this week had been interesting to say the least, but I still think we are talking past each other. I love BJ Penn. I was rooting hard for him against Edgar like I've cheered for him over the course of the decade. I believed in his ability to be one of the pantheon of greats. This is what I wrote for Heavy last year after a UFC source told us they were going to ask BJ to move back to welterweight after he "cleaned out" the lightweight class (oops!):

Penn is finally in a place to solidify his status as one of the sport’s all-time greats. He is clearly the best lightweight of all time, but he needs to put his stamp on that division with a long and unequaled title reign. Instead, sources inside the UFC tell Heavy.com that the master plan for Penn will include a move back to the welterweight class in 2011. Penn won’t be allowed to make his mark at his natural and appropriate weight. He will be asked, once again, to put his superior abilities to the test against bigger and stronger men. Penn, if the UFC follows this course, will be remembered as a great fighter, but not an all-time great. If he follows his true path, as the unbeatable lightweight he truly is, he will be remembered as a legend. Which would you rather be BJ?

The problem is, he got the opportunity and couldn't make the most of it. He's still a great fighter. But when you look at that first tier, the pantheon, the very top guys, he just doesn't belong anymore. Royce Gracie, Frank Shamrock, Chuck Liddell, Fedor Emelianenko, Matt Hughes, Anderson Silva, Georges St. Pierre. All have an amazing track record of success when the fights mattered most (and even Chuck is questionable on this list). BJ Penn had the talent to be in that group, but things didn't fall into place for him. He sticks out like a sore thumb.

I'd place Penn on a second tier of greats. Nogueira, Sakuraba, Randy Couture,Wanderlei...still Hall of Fame stars, but not the Babe Ruth's and Willie Mays of the sport. It's not damning. It's just how things have shaken out.  It's a great group of fighters - but still a step behind the pantheon. I don't think this is unfair, illogical, or "fighter bashing."

I haven't talked to Penn since this fight, but I don't think he would put himself among that first group. He was very conscious when we did speak before the second St. Pierre fight of his legacy. He understood that he had not maximized his potential. That he had partied too much, trained too little. And he knew that he had lost some of the biggest fights of his career. That's why he was so determined to turn over a new leaf.

It's amazing that some of you have responded with such vitriole, defending a fighter who has said the same things about himself. That's what makes BJ such a special person - he had the self awareness to recognize his career hadn't gone the way he hoped. And he made some changes. I hope they pay off for him. He's 31 years old. And, here's the thing not being discussed much: when he took the fight to Edgar, looked for the takedown, and went after him on the mat, he did well.

He's BJ Penn. At some point he decided he was a boxer. He's not. He's the greatest grappling talent of a generation. When someone slaps him in the head and reminds him of that I think we still may see great things. At least this fan is hoping we do.

Comment 175 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Funny that you mention Penn’s self-awareness when he continually attributes his insecurities and weaknesses onto his opponents in pre-fight interviews.

by bigweeze on Sep 1, 2010 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

When someone slaps him in the head and reminds him of that I think we still may see great things. At least this fan is hoping we do.

I think Penn has been slapped in the head enough times to be considered abuse.

by pud333 on Sep 1, 2010 10:04 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

So do I

And I can appreciate people disagreeing with that point of view as well, just the way some people bash you is so criminally uncalled for. I think you do your best to illustrate a point of view, and yes sometimes it’s extreme and causes strong reactions but I’d really hope people could at least discuss it reasonably.

"If the commission would sanction it and Dana would move, I’d fighter Anderson right now."
- Chael Sonnen at the post fight press conference following his loss to Anderson Silva.

Support independent artists
http://worldisart365.blogspot.com/

by Worldisart on Sep 1, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I admit I didn’t quite grasp what you were trying to put across in your first post on this topic, but you defined it pretty well in your call-in with Luke on his show. This post is your most concise one yet on this subject. It’s been an interesting discussion, for sure.

What I don’t get is why people freak out whenever they read your stuff. I think it’s great that there are so many different views on BE, even amongst the staff. Life would be so pedestrian if people were only ever preaching to the choir.

by pud333 on Sep 1, 2010 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

It took a little while, but you got there...

I agree with this one at least 163 times more than the first one. This one seems a lot more clear.

I don’t know that I agree 100% with all of it, but everyone is entitled to an opinion.

The fact that Penn has become such a polarizing character will help define his legacy as much as his talent or unreached potential. One way or another, people will remember Penn and some will remember him as better than he was. He is still one of the most popular fighters of the last 10 years and that says something.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

My comments from when this was a fanpost didn't make the move, but

I can sum it up with Chuck does not deserve to be on that top list. If he had beaten Rampage in PRIDE, sure, but that is too glaring of a hole for a pantheon level guy…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chuck’s loss to Rampage in PRIDE is definitely a big hole. Oh, what could have been if he had beaten Page…

by pud333 on Sep 1, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chuck losing to Rampage in Pride is meaningless, he belongs in the top pantheon because he’s the greatest LHW of all time his resume speaks for itself. No one has beaten as many top fighters and been as dominant a champion as he was though I disagree with alot of the other names on both tiers but that’s another story.

"they mad at me, I keep going hard reppin/
cause what's your Rampage to Rashad Evans/"
-Joe Budden (Something To Ride To)
http://www.zshare.net/audio/76866807deabe3c1/

by Nightwhistler on Sep 1, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

And BJ is the best LW of all time, but

Neither belongs in the highest of tiers due to their respective shortcomings…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 2, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chuck

losing to rampage in Pride is meaningless??
I strongly disagree.What about him losing to Rampage in the UFC rematch by first round KO?
I think your comment has little to no substance to be honest.

by Matt Mosley on Sep 3, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

This one is defiantly better than the previous. The first two had a few jabs in there and it made it seem as though you weren’t much of a Penn fan, but this one is a lot fairer.

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Props for taking the time to lay it out again. When I saw the headline I was thinking “AGAIN, REALLY?”, but this one seems much clearer. We don’t have to agree on the subject for props to be given for a well-written piece.

http://www.instrength.com

by Tim Burke on Sep 1, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

for both.
This is a much more balanced piece and i can understand that deadlines and emotions straight after the fight can effect how an article might come across.
I have nothing personal against Jonathan Snowden and i think most of your stuff is of a high standard.It’s just some of your opinions that seem to criticise too harshly and you certainly know how to wind MMA fans up! :)
Reading these subsequent articles i really think that you have mostly valid arguments but sometimes put them across in an inflammatory way that can provoke adverse reactions.
Good on you for clarifying your intentions and acknowledging the reasonable arguments against.

by Matt Mosley on Sep 1, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also

I agree with your placement of Penn in that second tier,at least for the time being. :)

by Matt Mosley on Sep 1, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's a pretty fair assesment but I disagree with the "Second Tier" of greats.

Sakaraba, Couture, Wandy, and Nog, are LEGENDS of the sport there is no denying that. I do believe Penn is a hall of famer BJ was a long time pound for pound great and is the only man besides Couture and Hendo to hold a belt in two weight classes in a major promotion. (I know I’m stating the obvious) I get the idea that most people seem to think he’s under performed in his career but I personally don’t think that’s fair. Penn has fought and beaten the best time and time again and he’s one of the few old guards that can still fight and a high level.

Ride the Tiger!

by doonerthesooner on Sep 1, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

The reason being

That your minder isn’t there to read the big words for you.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

This could not possibly be

A more fair and objective view point of BJ’s career, if anything it has been softened too much.

Unless you are one of those guys whose view is obscured by BJ’s brass pubes…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Haters gonna hate

Good article. I really like BJ Penn and I agree with your critique/assessment of his career and placement (future performances notwithstanding) in the annals of MMA greatness.

Only thing I’d contribute is that he be recognized as tier-1 in the Big Brass Ones category for jumping in weight classes, regardless of ego or outcome.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 10:13 AM EDT reply actions  

That is for sure. Like yesterday I interviewed Don Frye. Who know where I’d place Frye on the list of greats. But he was 300% bad ass.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

When's that getting posted?

Were you intimidated by his proboscis’ pushbroom?

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

BTW

Mad props for placing Frank Shamrock where he belongs, a big FU to Zuffa for trying to erase his accomplishments.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Could you hear his mustache rubbing against the mouth piece?

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

thats what makes him great.

He fears no one. Nobody can beat Bj…….. but Bj.
Joe rogan : did you train harder for this fight?

Bj: I rested harder.

Me: wtf does that mean Bj?

by the-gentle-way on Sep 1, 2010 11:07 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

this
And, here’s the thing not being discussed much: when he took the fight to Edgar, looked for the takedown, and went after him on the mat, he did well.

I thought Edgar was in big trouble once Penn took him down. Why he didn’t continue with this gameplan(gassed?) baffles me. Edgar’s TD defense isn’t THAT good.

CAGO WHY SOGS CAGO WHY SOGSSSS

by soxrule!35 on Sep 1, 2010 10:27 AM EDT reply actions  

I think it was a combination of three things.

1. BJ was rushing to advance position and make things happen on the ground – it was already the 4th round and he knew he needed a finish, it left opening for Edgar to get back to his feet or reverse.
2. BJ was already pretty well exhausted at that point in the fight.
3. Edgar is very hard to keep down and he’s very good in scrambles.

by Niles on Sep 1, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

also

BJ historically has stunned his opponents on the feet before taking them down.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Sep 1, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

It depends on how long Franky could have survived. I don’t think BJ has the stamina to do that for a whole fight.

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Frankie was able to repeatedly end up on top, who knows...

He did well and was never really threatened by Penn while he was on top. BJ would have been better of working for top position, but there is no guarantee he would have been able to maintain control in a ground fight either. It surely would have been more competitive though.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the failure here was due to his corner. I agree completely that BJ would have won a fight that took place, primarily, on the mat, but I also agree completely with what Nate said, and I’d imagine BJ was operating under a similar mindset. That’s something a good corner is going to point out though. Sadly, from what we heard from his corner on the broadcast, it sounded like they were content to blow smoke up his rear instead of offering meaningful advice.

by kid_eh on Sep 1, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Sep 1, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm going to try to turn the page

First- I think it is very hard to cement legacies until a fighter is finished. GSP is a bonafide super talent, but time will tell if he finishes his career like Hughes, or gets upset like Penn.

Wanderlei should be first tier. With everything he did in pride, and his unstoppable run- we can’t discredit what he’s done based upon a few bad showings. I don’t know if he puts together a title run at 185, but no matter what he WAS pride for a long time.

Frank is another guy that I think you have listed wrong. His accomplishments were incredible back in the day, but he’s a victim of himself, and was never able to reach another level with his career. I can’t see him being above Wand in any discussion of great or legends in the sport.

My personal tier of fighters would be:

1st- Penn, Wanderlei, Shogun, Liddell, Randy, Hughes, Silva, GSP, Fedor, Henderson

2nd- Ortiz, Gracie, Cro Cop, Big Nog, Sakuraba, Gomi

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 10:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Great as Wanderlei's big run was

Having 10 losses by age 32 keeps you out of the highest of tiers discussion IMO…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

considering who his losses are to, i’m keeping him in.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Where would you place Rich Franklin? Unless you disagree with the decision then nvm.

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm going to get a lot of flack

but i’d say third tier for Franklin. He has only lost to the best, but doesn’t have an incredible list of wins, all considering. And the Wanderlei fight was very, very close, so i don’t consider it a huge knock.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think that's fair

He’s kind of like Barkley and the rest of the NBA All-Stars who were stuck in the shadow of / being destroyed by Jordan (Anderson)

by menckenstein on Sep 1, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would personally put franklin in that second tier.

He consistantly beat guys that were always tought, although not always the best (lack of challengers in the UFC is to blame for that, not Franklin). And he’s had his battles with guys who are probably past their prime (Wanderlei, Liddell, Henderson), but I think how this last run of his goes will truley determine where he should be once he retires.

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think this is short-sighted

Not ever man can keep his body viable into their 30’s. This is exacerbated by the toll fighting in PRIDE took on those guys.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have to disagree with you...

I would leave out:
   Shogun: for now, just because he hasn’t been himself for a few years…give him a few fights still)

   Henderson: was always great but still couldn’t go on runs like the true greats..had losses to Misaki, Lil’ Nog, Wanderlei, Arona throughout pride…then 2 straight losses in the UFC

   Randy: was great at times, but still went 9-6 in title fights, losing to good but not great opponenets like Ricco, V. Overeem, Enson, Barnett

Wanderlei is a tough one for me. He went on a crazy run in Pride, but the fact that he’s 3-5 in the UFC bothers me…maybe thats just me being to picky though

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

i'm not only considering W/L, I'm considering relevance to the sport

Hendo- leaving pride with both belts

Randy- everything

Shogun- champ in Pride, champ in UFC. has to be 1st tier for that simple fact, that he was the first to do that.

And you have to think that Wanderlei’s run in the UFC has been against some serious opponents. Everyone loses- I mean, Chuck lost to JARDINE of all people. But its what they do in victory that defines them IMO.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand your point

But I was going just by wins, specifically big wins, when it counts.

Under your context, you would think that Royce would have to be in the top due to him dominating the sport for the very beginning years, and popularizing BJJ. And sakaraba for pretty much being MMA in Japan

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Royce is a legend in his own right

but not in this context.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

nog was actually

He then beat Randy after Randy came back. The only reason that was an interm title was because of legal posturing.

by the-gentle-way on Sep 1, 2010 12:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree with you on Shogun

He is one of my favorite fighters and may be an all time talent, but he hasn’t had a run of highs to put him in all time status yet. IMO anyways.

by truck on Sep 1, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

YET...

But if he can beat up Rashad, Lyoto again probably, Jones and whoever comes his way, then he will probably deserve it more then anyone. Because if anyone can hold on to the LHW belt right now for more then a few fights, with guys like Jones, Bader, Lil Nog, Machida, Rampage and Evans waiting in the wings, then they are probably going down as one of the greatest fighters ever…. But that its a BIG IF

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yah and the next time he blows away an opponent he’ll be the “greatest lightweight ever” once again. I would have been alot more impressed with this article if it was written before the last Edgar fight, because right now it just sounds like fickleness. For whatever reason, people just can’t come to terms with the fact that Frankie Edgar is the #1 lightweight in the world. People just can’t seem to admit that just maybe they don’t know as much about this new and dynamic sport as they think they do. So they try to smokescreen their earlier “Penn will steamroll Edgar” predictions with crap like “Penn was overrated to begin with” or “Edgar’s style is bad for mma” or any number of assinine opinions.

by joshyboy708 on Sep 1, 2010 10:29 AM EDT reply actions   2 recs

I have to agree with Snowden on where he puts BJ in the 2nd tier… that is of course based on what he has accomplished thus far and it could change depending on what he does with the rest of his fighting career.

by Niles on Sep 1, 2010 10:29 AM EDT reply actions  

This reads much better

You do seem to write more fairly, less reactionary, with a few days to reflect. In this “last word”, you even call Penn “great.” That is a far cry from your first article, in which you referred to him as “ordinary”, and (paraphrasing from memory), “not one of the greats.”

I doubt you would have received the vitriol you did if this was how you phrased your first piece. You would be hard-pressed to find many people to argue that BJ hasn’t lived up to the God-given potential that he has, but that only makes him overrated compared to what he could have been, not in comparison to the rest of the lightweight division.

by Rlaub44 on Sep 1, 2010 10:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Huh.

I’m not going to try to argue Snowden’s continually evolving opinion of Penn’s “greatness”, since I’m sure it will have changed between the time I start and the time I hit “Post,” but I will point out that of Snowden’s all time greats:

“Royce Gracie, Frank Shamrock, Chuck Liddell, Fedor Emelianenko, Matt Hughes, Anderson Silva, Georges St. Pierre.”

He beat one of them (Matt Hughes), that guy beat two others of them (GSP and Royce), many people argue that he beat yet another of them while losing a split decision (GSP), and another of them referred to him as the greatest fighter (Anderson).

Not to mention being one of two fighters to ever hold belts in two UFC weight classes et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 10:39 AM EDT reply actions  

pull the reigns back man.

just disagree. No point getting worked up anymore. He’s at least conceding that Penn is great now, he just doesn’t consider him first tier great. And in the scope of his first tier- exception being Shamrock, I disagree, but its more valid then saying he’s “ordinary”

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not worked up. Cool a s a cucumber over here.

As I said, I’m not going to bother disagreeing with what he thinks because there’s no point. The man is entitled to his opinion.

I’m just saying: who would you take in BJ vs. Hughes III if we scheduled it for Super Bowl weekend?

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's not a valid comparison

They’re at two different points of their careers.

by Pantherhare on Sep 1, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hughes' decline is VASTLY overstated

And i would love to see the trilogy, personally.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Me too.

I think Matt got really lucky in that second fight.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Or

He didn’t look at BJ as potentially being much of a threat in the first fight…underestimation – the deadliest of sins…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is that what you saw?

I mean, that’s a fun what-if, but that’s not how it looked to me. What gave you that impression?

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Matt said as much after the fight, although that could of course be the usual post-domination make-myself-feel-better bullshit (see Kos, Anderson, BJ, Carwin, etc)…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

You left BJ out of that list

And as we know, I want him on every list. :-)

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

There, I fixed it...

See above

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

FWEW

:-)

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just because Matt said as much after the fight. Then again, people tend to say a lot of make-myself-feel-better-about-getting-dominated things…see also Carwin, Anderson, Kos, BJ, Mir, etc…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hughes was scared of BJ

and made that clear a few times.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fine - that's a fair point, even with Hughes absolutely starching Ricardo.

So how about this: Snowden says that a guy with wins over the guys on his list of all time greats doesn’t qualify to be an all time great. I have a hard time parsing that is all.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

See,

It’s this inability to look at fights in context, or beyond the “W/L” column in their Wikipedia entry that’s keeping you out of my list of “All time great BE writers.”

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

That’s not “context.” You actually think the world should center around how you feel fights should have been decided. That’s incredible hubris.

Better get to compiling a comprehensive list of how you, Jemal Eddin, would have scored each and every fight over the last 17 years. The rest of us will respond accordingly I’m sure.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just remember-

As Henry Rosovsky-Harvard put it “never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.”

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

a) Jemaleddin is my first name.

Sorry if my crazy name is giving you trouble.

b) You’re right – it’s only me, 1 of the judges at ringside and FightMetric that think GSP lost the first fight. Nobody else ever makes that argument. I’m a lone voice crying out in the wilderness. Look upon my hubris, ye haughty, and despair.

Ahem.

c) I’m not arguing that we should all change the L to a W – I’m arguing that decisions like this have to be considered as binary option for the purposes of records, but that we the fans can have a more realistic view. Losing a close fight shouldn’t count the same in our minds as getting beaten soundly.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

exactly!!!

Everyone is sucking his “double leg” right now because he went almost five rounds with king. He got beat (exactly how I knew he would) but, there is no shame in his loss. That fight elevated sonnen, and as well it should have. Wins and losses aren’t everything. The fight is the important part.

by the-gentle-way on Sep 1, 2010 11:29 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

to some extent...

but the W or L is what seperates the greats from the almost greats….

Carwin ALMOST destroyed Brock in round 1….but he didn’t.

Sonnen almost beat the most unbeatable fighter on the planet…but he didnt.

This is why Lesnar and Silva are the champs and probably will be for a while, and Carwin and Sonnen are still just challengers.

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

The difference is that with BJ we're talking about decisions

He lost a very close split decision in BJ/GSP 1 and a (wrong) decision in BJ/Edgar 1. Do we count those the same way that we count his wins over Sherk or Sanchez?

My whole point is that a loss or a win isn’t just that. We have to look at the fight as a whole.

To stick with the Sonnen theme: he lost that fight. But not until he’d spent 23 minutes winning it.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he won the GPS fight as well.

You are not the only voice in the wilderness.

by Riney on Sep 1, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

The only people who think BJ won that fight are Penn fans, the fact is after he won the first round he fell part GSP showed that when push comes to shove you can break BJ.

"they mad at me, I keep going hard reppin/
cause what's your Rampage to Rashad Evans/"
-Joe Budden (Something To Ride To)
http://www.zshare.net/audio/76866807deabe3c1/

by Nightwhistler on Sep 1, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

So did Fightmetric.

Scoring can be objective too!

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 2, 2010 7:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is it reallly your first name?

Its very unique…

Is it just a different name, or is it an ethnic name?

This is a serious question, not trying to be a jack ass at all…

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

My mom got it out of a book.

It’s an Arabic name, and very popular in Muslim countries – moreso in those where people don’t speak Arabic, strangely enough. You see it a lot more in Iran or Pakistan than anywhere else.

I go by Jemal (since not even my mom can say it right), but never “Jemal Eddin” which is just weird.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

This really amazes me. Really.

When the consensus is that a decision is wrong, or is to close to call everyone SHOULD see that win/loss in context. I absolutely refuse to believe you think otherwise.

MMA has far to many pieces to the puzzle that is wins and losses to call them like you are trying to.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Didn't you hear?

I’m unreasonable.

Sigh.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

And he pays no mind to position...

Position!
jk

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

See, this is why I scored the first fight for BJ instead of GSP!

He wanted to be on the bottom! :-P

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Therefore:

Dennis Hallman is an alltime great becaue he beat Hughes (x2!!), and hughes beat GSP and Royce.

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, if my argument was based on that alone, I guess you'd be making some headway.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess

That you are one of those guys who can be counted on to defend your blinds without rhyme or reason in all situations…amirite?

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely not!

I’m actually pretty reckless about that. I have a tendency to just play the odds on the cards I have and neglect to factor in the blinds, position, chip counts, etc.

But nice job trying to psychoanalyze me! :-)

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep, definitely a reflexive blind defender...

It is one of my degrees, although I don’t use it professionally…then again, I don’t use my econ degree for that matter…hmm…
;)-

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Position is something you should look into closer. Your pockets will like you more. Gotta throw on the heat sometimes.

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know it - I just get caught up in the math.

I’m good at math! :-)

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am a fan BJ Penn

But lately as a fighter he’s been disappointing me time and time again.

I agree with Snowden in saying that getting Edgar on the ground should have been his top priority. His grappling is his main strength. Not his boxing.

Now in saying that, BJ’s cardio during the fight, was completely piss poor. I don’t know how or who exactly he training with, but BJ’s going to have to re-up his training regiment.

Also, as Joe Rogan stated at the end of the broadcast on the weekend, BJ needs to train with a new camp if he wants to continue to compete. Frankie Edgar exposed a few of BJ’s weaknesses. And until he fixes them, or learns some new tricks, he going to remain venerable to his future opponents willing to exploit them

by devious1 on Sep 1, 2010 11:25 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

This isn’t inconsistent with what I wrote yesterday, which was an expansion of what I wrote int he middle of the night after the fight. I thought it would be obvious when I said he was “ordinary” and not extraordinary that he was just another fighter, not a superhuman being. Apparently not.

For what it’s worth, I wouldn’t put either fighter with titles in two weight classes in the first tier.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

While randy is an MMA Icon, and a great, he never has truely been one of the “best ever”. He lost in to many title fights to consider him one of the elite.

I reserve that term for guys who win 5 or 6 title fights. Or guys who go undefeated for numerous years, while still fighting consistantly, or guys who show up and win in almost every big fight they put themselves in.

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think that guys who have won titles in two weight classes in a major promotion HAVE to be first tier. It is an incredibly impressive thing to do.

Hendo, Randy, BJ. They are the only people that have done that thus far. They have to be first tier for that.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Unless they lose to Frankie Edgar.

Right? Right?

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

and

Jens pulver, and drawing Caol Uno, and Edgar (x2), and Matt Hughes and GSP…

Its not like he’s consistantly beaten the best of the best…

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nor has he wasted a lot of time fighting guys that don't deserve to be in the ring with him.

*cough*Fedor*cough*.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'll actually agree with you here...

Yes, he took some money fights, but he consistently sought out difficult challenges and, even if he fell short in many, he deserves props for that.

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, you won't have to look to far to find people arguing the opposite.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree...

But when faced with the challenges of big time fights…Fedor always won.

Big nog (x2) Crocop, Randleman, Coleman (x2), Fujita, Zulu (jk)…

The fact of the matter is that while Fedor hasn’t always faced the most stellar competition, when he has, he always won.

BJ, on the other hand, Didn’t.

Does that mean he wasn’t great? No it doesnt
Does it mean he wasn’t the best of all time? Yes it does

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

We're not arguing whether he is the best of all time.

But is he among the best of all time? I say yes.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

This shit has to stop. EVERYONE LOSES. Penn brutally beat almost every lightweight Zuffa had to offer in the modern era.

He was virtually untouchable against Sanchez- and we can play mmath games now, but Sanchez’s only two losses had been decisions at that point. BJ dropped him within 20 secs in the first. Diego landed 8 TOTAL STRIKES and 0 TDS. That is ridiculous. I’ve been saying, i just don’t believe that the same BJ from the Diego fight would’ve lost so handily to Edgar. time will tell.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think that you are arguing that BJ could have been the best, Rather then him actually Being the best

The fact of the matter is he is sub .500 in title fights. When you speak of elite, great athletes, regardless of the sport, you shouldn’t have to back your agruement by saying “If he would have done this..” or “Had this version shown up….”

What makes the fighter great is the ablity to win when it matters. BJ didnt always do that.

Yes, he fought Gomi and won. Yes he beat Stevenson, Sherk, Sanchez and destroyed them…. BUT he was still 5-5-1 in title fights.

As a die hard Buffalo Bills fan, I could make the case that Jim Kelly was one of the best QB’s ever. He revolutionized the no-huddle offense, and the Bills won 4 straight AFC championships. But he went 0-4, when it really mattered. That is what seperates him from John elway… The same as BJ going 5-5-1 in title fights seperates him from GSP who is 7-2 in title fights..

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

How is he doing in LW championship fights?

4-3-1? Is that sub-.500? I’m not sure how we’re counting that draw…

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

The fight that he had with Caol Uno was scored a draw…it was for the vacant LW title…where is the confusion coming from?

I’m not trying to argue that BJ wasn’t great. He was.

But he wasn’t truley Elite. Can you really say that a champion was elite when he won half of his title fights?

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I only hope we see that same Penn again

by X5-452 on Sep 2, 2010 4:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

"just another fighter."

Gotcha.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

With all I’ve written you are really going to manipulate things and make some bizarre case that I am dissing Penn? Now you are pulling out phrases instead of full sentences to misconstrue, forget about discussing whole articles or ideas. Soon it will be a combination of letters.

I’m out. Despite some voices who can argue rationally and respectfully with each other, it’s too much of a game of one-upsmanship here.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm surprised you hadn't taken this tactic before

it perplexes me that after this amount of time you’d still try to argue in the comments. It makes some peoples day to ruin yours.

I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.

by Austin Martin on Sep 1, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm actually not out to ruin JS's day.

I like his book.

I’m just here to say that the things he’s written about BJ are wrong. And since he’s agreed with me, and shifted his position, I’m pretty okay with how things are going.

Full disclosure: I’m a Frankie Edgar fan.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

But check out the shirt!

:-)

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oooo man you’ve got too many enemies to post up your pick. I see photo shopped pictures with male reproductive organs in your future.

by DayGeaux on Sep 1, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dude, I make those for myself!

Oh shit. I’vesaidtoomuch…

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here's the thing.

You want us to forget the things that you wrote and try to figure out the things you meant. I’m sorry that you’ve been incautious about the things you write and that they don’t always reflect what you meant to express.

But I can only argue with the actual words you put out there. Right?

And accusing me of pulling things out of context is odd, given how you pulled 3 words out of context and accused me of making personal attacks against you.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just to echo Snowden's sentiment

It’d be nice if people like you could have real discussions and make real points rather than resorting to condescending sarcasm.

"If the commission would sanction it and Dana would move, I’d fighter Anderson right now."
- Chael Sonnen at the post fight press conference following his loss to Anderson Silva.

Support independent artists
http://worldisart365.blogspot.com/

by Worldisart on Sep 1, 2010 11:19 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

If Snowden weren't doing the same thing, that'd sting a lot more.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh yes

The classic response of “He’s doing it too!”

How very adult of you. Good to see you let others completely dictate your actions and behavior.

"If the commission would sanction it and Dana would move, I’d fighter Anderson right now."
- Chael Sonnen at the post fight press conference following his loss to Anderson Silva.

Support independent artists
http://worldisart365.blogspot.com/

by Worldisart on Sep 1, 2010 11:24 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

That's a much easier response than reading what he posted, isn't it?

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think it’s best to just ignore him. He doesn’t really want to discuss this. He wants to “win.”

Out this time, I promise.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

God speed John

I may not always agree with you but I’ve got your back

"If the commission would sanction it and Dana would move, I’d fighter Anderson right now."
- Chael Sonnen at the post fight press conference following his loss to Anderson Silva.

Support independent artists
http://worldisart365.blogspot.com/

by Worldisart on Sep 1, 2010 11:30 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I am of the opinion he's made several valid points over the last few days...

"In this fight, Anderson showed he was human," Nogueira said. "He showed he could be weak. But he showed he is a fighter and he brings something from his heart. It was beautiful."

by Broke Lesnar on Sep 1, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

i like this piece

much much better than ur post fight one and im full of agreement on just about everything

its a rarity i say this but good job snowden, now please stay away from the shock pieces when u write like this its much much better

We have a saying back home that if your coming on, COME ON!!!!

by milk72 on Sep 1, 2010 10:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Good article

As an aside, if you don’t want to get flamed, then it might be good to take the time to “crystallize your thoughts” as you say, before putting up a post the night of the fight calling someone overrated.

If you do want to get flamed, and get 500+ posts, that’s cool too. It’s a good debate. And generally I like your articles and agree with you on many subjects. In this case, I just don’t know how “overrated” the consensus #1 LW of all time (so far) can be. Your discussions of top tier vs. second tier is interesting in that respect.

Remember, before the Edgar fights, Penn was 12-1-1 at LW with 11 finishes and 4-1-1 in title fights (with four finishes). He was undefeated for 8 years at LW. He had arguably the best boxing, BJJ and take down defence in MMA (he’d only been taken down a handful of times at LW – he may never have been knocked down). He still has never been finished at LW.

Even with the two consecutive losses, and even if he loses all the rest of his fights the rest of his life, even if he goes into women’s mma and loses all of those fights, and then ends up dancing for nickels, based on the first eight years of his career at lightweight, he is going in the HOF. His accomplishments may one day be surpassed (and probably will). But he was still the king of an era and a great fighter.

How great compared to others, and how great compared to what he could have been, is a very live point.

by Clifford J on Sep 1, 2010 11:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Also

I know it is not your intention, but calling BJ Penn overrated takes away from Frankie’s accomplishment in dethroning him, which is extraordinary.

by Clifford J on Sep 1, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

My point is that I think he’s the best LW of all time. He decimated most opponents put infront of him.

BUT…. He isn’t one of the best mma fighters of all time.

Just because he’s probably the best LW ever, does that mean he has to be one of the elite fighters ever? I don’t think so.

I think that ranking or status or whatever you want to call it, should be reserved for the likes of Fedor, Anderson, GSP, Hughes, Liddell…. Guys who were untouchable, were always prepared for the fight, and when it came time to fight for the Championship, Rarely lost.

Records in their true weight class title fights:
Fedor: 4-0 in Pride HW title fights (won HW grand prix inbetween title defences)
GSP: 7-2= 77%
Hughes: 8-4 = 66%
Anderson: 14-0 (including UFC, shooto and cage rage) = 100%
BJ: 4-3-1 = 50%

To me, that championship record means that he wasn’t an elite, greatest of all time, martial artist…

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

he got out pointed this last time.

Every writer on this site scored the first one for Bj.mma Judging is imperfect at best.

by the-gentle-way on Sep 1, 2010 12:25 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree...

He lost that fight for sure, but the point is, hasn’t been as elite as many other guys.

I think that my standard for elite is higher then some. As i’ve said before, I think the elite status, or level 1 all time greats, or how ever you would like to refer to it as, should be left for those who are almost unbeatable. Guys who go on championship runs for years. Guys who beat contender after contender after contender, even when they are getting their ass kicked (Anderson vs. Chael), or guys who, even when they are facing lackluster opponents (GSP vs. Hardy, Silva vs. Maia or Leites, Chuck vs. Babalu) they still come 100% everytime.

BJ hasn’t gone on a run like that. He hasn’t defended his belt flawlessly against 6 straight opponents. He hasn’t come 100% to every fight(mentally or physically).

So while he could have been, and should have been an elite fighter, to me, he wasnt.

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he is the best LW of all time

Then, I would conclude, that makes him one of the best MMA fighters of all time by default.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

really?

I think that Chuck Liddell is the best LHW of all time, but I wouldn’t put him in the same category as GSP, Fedor or Anderson.

Just because they are the best in a weight class doesn’t automatically put you in as one of the best ever.

If Dominick Cruz wins 3 more fights at BW, giving him a record of 5-0 in title fights, also meaning he’s probably the best BW of all time… does that put him in with the guys mentiond above?

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that Chuck Liddell is the best LHW of all time, but I wouldn’t put him in the same category as GSP, Fedor or Anderson.

If you really think that about Chuck, then yes you should. LHW was one of the deepest divisions of the sport. IF (big if, imo) he is the best of all time in that class then he SHOULD be one of our GOATS.

Just because they are the best in a weight class doesn’t automatically put you in as one of the best ever.

I agree, it depends on the quality of the weight class.

If Dominick Cruz wins 3 more fights at BW, giving him a record of 5-0 in title fights, also meaning he’s probably the best BW of all time… does that put him in with the guys mentiond above?

Not yet. It would depend on how the quality of depth at BW sorts out.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

You forgot the most important factor

Haters gonna hate.

And sadly, even people who like BJ can’t help but hate on him too. :-/

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Says a guy named Fedorable. :-P

So does Fedor shave ’em, or go for a more natural look?

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

all natural baby

Its like a rain forest down there

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why did I even bring that up....

Urf.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stop that!

I’m eating while reading this…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

But his strength of schedule is second to none. I don’t want to see records that are 25-0 fighting cans. I personally like fighters who challenge themselves. If BJ had a Nick Diaz commitment he would be the greatest ever, he doesn’t do he won’t be.

by Riney on Sep 1, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good Post, Snowden

Regardless of what one writes of certain fighters, there is going to be blowback and while that may help numbers it is also an indication of the fan base support each fighter can achieve to either motivate or to solidify the encompassing bubble. That said, I think Snowden’s article here raises valid points of view and though there are equally valid counterpoints, I commend him for the quality and evenness of presentation. It displayed a bit of courage knowing you were going to get flamed a great deal on points either not considered or are not actually part of the original post.
Good job, Snowden.

by Dean Head on Sep 1, 2010 12:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Since Sakuraba is the greatest fighter to have ever competed in MMA

I think your entire premise is hosed.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 12:35 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

VB, taking a tip from the Japanese judges...

…judges the entirety of the career instead of any particular round, and awards points for displaying budo.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I honestly consider writing some sort of penultimate Saku post

but fear I would plagiarize to much and, frankly, to many fans wouldn’t care.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Regardless:

You’re right. Making Saku second tier is a crime against good sense.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

As far as fighting goes...

He’s probably 2nd tier with a good amount of losses scattered thoughout…

But as far as Icons, Legacy and growth of the sport.. He’s got to be top 5 along with GSP, Liddell, Royce and probably Tito (unfortunatly)

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man, I don't know.

I’m too emotional about all of that to be objective, so I recuse myself. But Saku proves that there’s more to fighting than winning and losing. There’s more than ending up with belts or titles. He transcends this kind of argument.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.

by jemaleddin on Sep 1, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

As far as fighting goes…He’s probably 2nd tier with a good amount of losses scattered thoughout

Absolutely not. Then again, this article seems to want to set a precedent that any loss is a loss regardless of context, but Sakuraba never once actually fought in his weight class. A Lightweight beat Rampage. Even before Penn lost to Frankie and everyone thought he was the best LW ever, NOBODY would give him a chance to beat a guy like Quinton. He Gave Igor (Igor was the scariest, nastiest, BMF on the planet at the time) everything he could handle AFTER fighting an hour and a half with Royce the same night.

Saku was so far on another level, he could nullify weight of other skilled fighters like nobody has ever done and, probably, nobody ever will do.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

you're probably right

Its to bad he spent his whole career fighting guys who were always bigger, and stronger then he was.

But that goes back to playing the “if” game. If he would have fought as a WW or LW his whole career? He probably would have been the best at that weight class of all time. But he didn’t…

I don’t know what to think with him, because the difference between him and BJ is that BJ only fought a few fights out of his weight class, and only won one of those fights.

Saku on the other hand consistantly beat guys out of his weight class such as Rampage, Randleman and Shannon Ritch…(jk).

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea

That’s why, at least with guys like Saku, you can’t really think of “best in a weight class” since he didn’t give a shit about them. You just have to look at what a guy his size accomplished, which seems impossible unless you know about it and/or saw it.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

IDK...

Where is Minowaman in all of this…?

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Huh
He’s the greatest grappling talent of a generation.

No, he’s really really not.

Do you need to use such hyperbole in every article?

"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't." - Jack Dempsey

by Jack.Barrington on Sep 1, 2010 1:15 PM EDT reply actions  

well... yes. he was...

He earned a Black belt, and won the world BJJ Championship in under 5 years of practicing bjj. that was/is unheard of.

Sure he isn’t as decorated as a Maia or Roger Gracie, but thats because he stopped practicing only BJJ and turned into a mixed martial artist.

Had he continued to only train in BJJ and participate in grappling tourniments instead of fighting, I’m sure he’d go down as one of the best grapplers ever.

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yet another "if only" applied to BJ

Hmmm… I am begining to sense a pattern here…

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer

Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...

by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tough to argue with this assesment

I love BJ, but if you want to be in that discussion of all-time P4P greats, you gotta win the fights.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Snowden, please explain how Frank Shamrock is a first tier great, while Randy Couture is a second tier great.

Check out my MMA highlight videos!
http://www.dailymotion.com/WheelchairBandit

by Brian Mayes on Sep 1, 2010 1:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Snow

Has an unhealthy love for Frank Shamrock.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's my issue

Frank IS a legend. He is a pioneer. But his in fight legacy is practically non existent. He ducked guys for years to keep up the facade of his greatness. Why Snowden rewards that and piles it on BJ seems inconsistent.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

He never ducked anyone. Plus, any argument about Penn is largely disconnected from discussion about Frank. How are they connected? Neither was perfect, but their flaws are completely different.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

They are connected

because you put Frank above BJ in your personal “greatness” rankings but there seems to be no consistency to it. Which, frankly, is fine. We all have different reasons for our opinions which is what makes discussion so fun.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve agreed with him on most of this topic (BJ) but I can’t support him with Frank Shamrock. You pretty much hit the nail on the head as far as why he shouldn’t be considered an all time great fighter.

by Fedorable on Sep 1, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think he fought “scrubs” in Strikeforce, but that second act is largely irrelevant to his status as an all-time great. It’s like his Mays on the Mets moment. Nor were the guys he fought in the UFC “easy opponents.” I’m not sure why you would say that.

BJ isn’t getting “bashed” for moving up to welterweight. He’s not being “bashed” at all. He lost most of those fights at welterweight, but he made a good living doing it. I don’t think you need to make a case for BJ at Frank’s expense.

BTW, Frank Shamrock community interview still coming.

by Jonathan Snowden on Sep 1, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can't wait!
BTW, Frank Shamrock community interview still coming

I’ve been really hoping you are Nate would write some sort of post about Frank because I WANT to see what you guys do. I’ve never found him to be any more than Bas Rutten, maybe even less, to the sport.

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

“you are Nate”…. should be “you OR Nate”

:p

"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse

by Chris Barton on Sep 1, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good post

Before the dethronings by Edgar, BJ looked on track for the kind of dominant title run that would have cemented him as one of the all time greats. Obviously predicting how people will look back on the career of someone who isn’t done fighting yet is an inexact science at best, but if he quit fighting today, I see an MMA historian in 2025 looking back at BJ Penn as “one of the most intriguing figures in MMA history,” or something like that. Ultra talented, multi division belt holder, but fans still felt he could have been more, and he had several high profile losses to go with his big wins.

The book is not closed yet obviously, but barring another epic run, I think this is a fair charactarization.

I consider myself a softcore fan.

by Thor77 on Sep 2, 2010 11:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Favritegotevj9_small
An Open Letter to Nick Diaz
Tatum_small
Aristotle Knows Nick Diaz Didn't Cheat
Walshrun_small
5 Reasons I Hate MMA
Royce_09_small
Call To Nominate New Bloody Elbow Moderators
Obp_small
The Official BE UFC Drinking Game

Recent FanPosts

Logo_d__small
Roll a phat one for Nick Diaz
Cg_small
Perceptions Regarding Diaz v. Condit Decision Distorted by the Judging Chameleon
Cf_small
George Rush St. Pierre BJJ Coach Renzon Gracie Black belt John Danaher
Jules-winfield-7_small
In Defense of Nick Diaz
208730_10150164903466743_503301742_7348043_3232767_n_small
Top Five: Fights To Look Forward To
Bruce-lee-lats_small
Calling for Nick Diaz to be released makes no sense.
Afro_small
The UFC Has Been Spared Once Again...This Time by Carlos Condit

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings