Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

Why Finishing Matters

A lot of people (ok, me) have taken the recent wins by Frankie Edgar and Gray Maynard as an opportunity to reopen the age-old debate over the importance of finishing fights, and whether the ongoing evolution of MMA is leading toward a less exciting, fan-friendly style of fighting.

As far as I can tell from my completely unscientific straw poll of Bloody Elbow commenters, there are two basic camps of MMA fans:

-- The first camp consists of those who say that MMA is not only just fine as it is, it is getting better all the time. Guys like Frankie Edgar, Gray Maynard and Jon Fitch are extremely talented, tactical fighters, and watching them implement their game plans is a pleasure for any true fan. The only thing that matters is winning the game, and these guys are showing a newer, better, safer way to do just that.

-- The second camp says that the rise not only of decisions -- but of fighters who seem to be tailoring their approach to winning decisions, rather than finishing their opponents -- is robbing MMA of some of the immediacy that made the sport appealing in the first place.

I fall squarely into that second camp. And while I'm not ready to declare the Edgar and Maynard wins as ironclad evidence of an MMA-spanning trend, I suspect strongly that we're going to see more and more fighters following the blueprint they've laid out. And I believe MMA will eventually be the worse for it.

The violence and danger inherent in MMA is a feature, not a bug. If we wanted to watch a safe sport where elite athletes displayed their talents without putting themselves in harm's way, we'd watch tennis. If we wanted to watch a sport fitting that description that is decided by a random, often-biased collection of judges, there's always figure skating.  In MMA and other fight sports, points and judging are necessary evils, not ends unto themselves. Working for the judges, rather than for the decisive win, perverts the purity of the sport.

There's a reason why most sports fans in this country know who Jack Dempsey is (last fight: September, 1927) and most of them couldn't tell you who won the NCAA Division 1 heavyweight wrestling championship this year. The violence and danger of MMA is part of the appeal, we shouldn't celebrate the fighters who are mastering the art of avoiding it.

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

Comment 92 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Eh

To Me, I like to think of MMA’s matches as a simulation of winning a real fight.

If you win by decisions, but you win every round (ala Edgar v Penn), then to me that’s fine. If the Edgar-Penn fight continued onward, eventually BJ would’ve been “finished”, because he couldnt beat Edgar.

Finishes are fine, they show that one fighter would finish the other in a real fight. But decisions show superiority too.

by garik16 on Sep 1, 2010 12:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Some Decisions

I agree that Penn Edgar 2 showed enough dominance. I believe that with 2 more rounds that fight is over. Can I say the same with Cruz Benavidez? Or Couture Vera?

by SES 84 on Sep 1, 2010 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here's the thing

You can’t really hold the fighters responsible. Especially wrestlers, who have the ability to control the opponent and win fights by doing so, they’re just looking out for themselves and understand the marketability problems a grinding style can cause.

However, the real blame lies with the actual judging system- i’ve said this time and again, but a system that values control over damage is doomed to fail, and not representative of a true fight. If MMA is the sport of fighting, then damage needs to be the most important scoring criteria, with control taking a clear second place.

Damaging strikes (volume + power), damaging slams/ throws, and close submission attempts (choke partially in place, partially extended joint/ compression lock), maybe damaging/ draining positions (knee on belly, crossface, anaconda bodylock from back control, etc).

Despite BJ’s loss to Edgar, he brought up a good point a little while back- only submission attempts and damage are effective ways of ending a fight. Grappling positions, low- impact takedowns, and guard passes are necessary and integral parts of the sport, but they don’t do damage and they don’t end fights, so they shouldn’t score points. In lieu of a significant gap in damage, control is an acceptable difference maker.

You can read my work over @ http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Sep 2, 2010 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Agree 100 percent

As long as you reward that sort of fighting, you have to expect it to continue.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 2, 2010 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

well said

When a drag-down with no GNP can be considered to ‘steal’ the round, there’s something wrong with the scoring. A takedown should be scored like landing one jab (unless it is a throw/slam). Like a jab, it may hurt a bit, and it sets up other, more punishing attacks, and it’s better to have landed the jab then to have had it landed on you by the opponent, but by itself it doesn’t count for much.

I consider myself a softcore fan.

by Thor77 on Sep 2, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Very true

In fact, i’d even score it less than a jab in some circumstances. Being on top, passing guard, all those things are just a means to inflicting more damage and executing submissions.

As an example, I’d say that IMO Andre Winner beat Lentz in their prelim bout, because he landed the more numerous damaging strikes from range and in the clinch. The only round I gave to Lentz was round 3, because he landed a few decent shots on the ground, and even that round was close.

You can read my work over @ http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Sep 2, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can look at it this way – when you got to a better position, you have a better chance of finishing the fight. So if you consistently put your opponent in bad position, the judges have to assume you’re more likely to finish the fight at some point, if it goes on indefinitely.

I’m not sure I agree with that, but that’s one way of looking at it. Personally, I don’t think decisions will ever be fair, and every close decision should be a draw… but I know that’s dumb and unrealistic.

"You hear people say, 'You're the greatest,' and all this stuff. It's BS. It's fake, it's all fake. You've just got to keep training as hard as you can. The only thing real is the fight, everything else is fake." - BJ Penn

by crazybones on Sep 2, 2010 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well,

it’s not about what could hypothetically happen, it’s about what does take place in the cage.

And really, isn’t it only a bad position if bad things happen from it? If I’m just staying low in mount with grapevines and chillin, i’m not going to submit anyone from there, and i’m not gonna land any damaging blows. Having side control/ mount/ back control really only has merit from the standpoint that it gives you a better platform to land damaging blows and attempt submissions.

As I said, taking the other combatant down, passing guard, holding position, all those show better control, but control takes a back seat to damage IMO. When you give decisions to guys like Lentz who are inferior strikers (and know it), but can use their wrestling to stay out of danger, then you just encourage stalling.

Wrestlers aren’t ruining MMA, the scoring system is. And it just so happens that the scoring system greatly favors wrestlers.

You can read my work over @ http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Sep 2, 2010 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. Position should only count in the absence of damage or submission attempts that require escape.

What's this war in the heart of nature? Why does nature vie with itself? The land contend with the sea? Is there an avenging power in nature? Not one power, but two?

by Kwisatz Haderach on Sep 4, 2010 2:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pretty good

Personally I’m in the camp that says fighters should learn to deal with wrestlers or anything that works within the scoring system. But this is a nice level-headed approach and solution.

All i really want are knees to the head of a grounded op. IMO it will solve a lot of problems.

by Revolver on Sep 4, 2010 3:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

In a real fight

Gray Maynard would be fishhooked, have his eyes gouged out and his testicles Joe-Son-ed every time he shot in and got a takedown.

by sBruce24 on Sep 2, 2010 2:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

In actuality

Maynard would be the one headbutting, ball smashing and eye gouging.

Guillotine.

by iiowyn on Sep 2, 2010 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's more fighting on the ground than Gray Maynard has ever done.

So he’d no longer be the Gray Maynard we know, and thus mission accomplished as far I’m concerned

by sBruce24 on Sep 4, 2010 3:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yea but

Fighters with this style do well, both that fighters with those skills and the ability to finish do much better. Thats why Edgar wont be champ long.

by Malachi Holder on Sep 1, 2010 12:40 AM EDT reply actions  

I think attempting to finish is more of a problem than actual finishing

Fitch isn’t ever going to be champion because he has one way of winning (LnP) and when you take that away from him that’s it. GSP sadly is probably the only fighter who is capable of beating him.

Maynard wins pretty much the same way but there is no one at lightweight with better wrestling than him. If there is a lightweight GSP out there or anyone with superior wrestling then Gray is done.

Mo Johnston is what John Schneider could be in 4 years.

by SSreporters on Sep 1, 2010 12:50 AM EDT reply actions  

We just need a bigger Edgar

He’d probably have some KO power, too. We’re not even close to the endgame for MMA. It’s still evolving, and still isn’t drawing too many of the elite athletes around the world. We’ve been saying for ages that GSP is the MMA fighter of the future, but nobody in any weight class has his overall game yet.

If Diaz can beat a top 20 WW who is a wrestler, I’d like to see him take on Maynard again.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hmm..

You speak of wrestlers being the problem. I think that there was a time when dominant wrestlers finished fights. Back when the headbutt was allowed it was a boon to wrestlers finishing fights, also in america we weight the takedown too heavily. It’s why GSP won the first Penn fight. It’s a problem, but what are you going to do, the premier combat sport athlete in the USA is the Freestyle wrestler, who isn’t drilling finishing skills, but rather positional control skills.

Nice post though, I don’t think that it’s killing the sport, but I do see your point. Rec’d by the way

Jonathan Snowden: The Glenn Beck of MMA reporting.

by Kidroll on Sep 1, 2010 12:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Danke

And I don’t think it’s about wrestling specifically (or at least entirely). I was never a huge Matt Hughes fan, but the guy knew (knows) how to finish fights and definitely displays a killer instinct. The modern wrestleboxer may be a different animal though.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think defense has just gotten better.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was listening to Jim Rome’s radio show yesterday and he had some guy on there who went to the show. He told Rome he hated it and I was waiting for the usual “brutal cockfight” line, when the guy completely surprised me. He said it was boring as hell.

Sad thing is it’s kind of hard to argue. I just keep telling myself the sport is young, it is still evolving.

by RoB_ex on Sep 1, 2010 12:59 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

My stepdad says the same thing (at a full-grown age of 65). UFC bores the hell out of him. He would rather read a book on his Kindle than watch someone get ridden for 15 minutes. He has his favorites, of course, but none of them wrestle.

Did you see the size of that chicken?

by Heenan on Sep 1, 2010 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

I see a huge difference between what Frankie Edgar did at 118 and what Gray Maynard does to, well, everyone he fights.

"He sucks weiner! He sucks weiner!" - II SMASH II

by Earl Montclair on Sep 1, 2010 1:26 AM EDT reply actions  

That's totally fair

And I don’t really care about the individual fighters as much, as I do about what may or may not be a trend toward deliberate point fighting on the part of elite mixed martial artists. Also, I won’t take anything away from the skill sets of those guys. I just question whether their approach is good for the sport.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I just think that guys who have a safe style will eventually get their run ended very violently. Like Shogun did to Machida.

Frankie will probably get Maynard’ed (again) but then after that everyone has no choice bet to get their TDD upgraded and then it will be something else new.

"He sucks weiner! He sucks weiner!" - II SMASH II

by Earl Montclair on Sep 1, 2010 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

But acting as if developing a takedown defense sufficient to stopping top level wrestlers is something everyone can just do is inconcievable. The Freestyle Wrestler in america is constantly drilling taking down (and not getting taken down) by the best in the world at the inverse. So their positional control is lightyears ahead of everyone elses. BJ and GSP being the lone exceptions to my mind BJ with the Takedown Defense and GSP with the offensive top control/takedowns as guys that didn’t grow up wrestling but added it to their game. the other thing that doesnt get brought up enough is the wrestler’s cardio advantage in almost every fight. That’s what generally has won them alot of fights. Fitch can just straight outlast you. Randy is known as a Cardio machine (at 47) and Coleman in his day was just constantly coming to get you, not to mention Faber, and Edgar…See a trend growing here? Wrestling your whole life not only gives you the positional control, but also an enormous cardio reserve, which may be their largest advantage.

Jonathan Snowden: The Glenn Beck of MMA reporting.

by Kidroll on Sep 1, 2010 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

well then there can only be one logical solution........

“Let’s go. Work!”
Milford Sound in New Zealand

"He sucks weiner! He sucks weiner!" - II SMASH II

by Earl Montclair on Sep 1, 2010 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

MMA only

I think one difference I see is guys especially in America training MMA at a younger age. When fighters do this they will have similar wrestling proficiency but also far better striking and subs, which could potentially mean more finishes…Hopefully at least.

by SES 84 on Sep 1, 2010 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

That is key

As effective as wrestling is as a tool in MMA, it does not have a finishing component built into it. Wrestlers need to bolt on finishing ability after the fact, and many COUGHfitchCOUGH never do. Some guys, like Matt Hughes, have a natural killer instinct and a feel for finishing, but others don’t even seem to have any interest in developing that aspect of their game.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fitch is a black belt under Camarillo; he clearly knows how to finish guys. His inability to do so is probably a combination of (i) the fact it’s very difficult to finish guys with RNCs in MMA fights — maybe it’s the gloves (see, e.g., Garcia’s lone MMA fight; the guy has choked out everyone in the grappling world who’s any good but he couldn’t choke out some mediocre grappler after he easily took his back) and (ii) Fitch doesn’t have good guard passing skills or feels more comfortable just punching people in half guard or full guard.

Fitch has also fought one of the tougher schedules of any non-title holder in recent times. So that also proabably has something to do with it. Nevertheless, I still have to admit you have a point; for whatever reason, Fitch isn’t finishing fights. It might in part be a lack of a killer instinct.

"If a dick don't get hard offa cocaine, what would you axe it?" O.D.B.
"To be is to be the value of a bound variable." W.V.O Quine
"I shoot. I score. He shoots. I score." Dan Gable.

by The Darkness on Sep 1, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think Fitch might not be mean enough. Most of the fighters I’ve met are perfectly friendly guys under normal circumstances, but they all have that nasty edge that make them want to hurt people.

Also Fitch has proven to himself that he can outlast and outwork just about anyone not named GSP without putting himself in harms way. Not a lot of upside for him taking the risk on a finish.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Guard Passing

I think that’s the key for the future of MMA. Pass the guys guard and pound on him, maybe get a head and arm choke or something like that. See what Jon Jones is doing with that and its just devastating.

Lots of wrestlers earn their black belts, but two caveats,
1. I’m not in the gym, but I suspect a lot of them are using their wrestling to aid their BJJ. This makes them very competitive with other black belts and hence they deserve one, but their pure technique isn’t as efficient.
2. Sure you can have a BJJ black belt, but what do you do in the heart of a fight. If guys pick up MMA late they really won’t internalize and integrate subs the same way a younger guy might.

by SES 84 on Sep 1, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Guard passing is good and all

but wrestlers prioritise control over position, and the reality of it is that all a wrestler really needs is a good half-guard game to totally control an opponent. The striking damage he can do from that position is merely a bonus to the opponent control.

That’s what we’ll probably see mostly, wrestlers taking down and going to half-guard. Brock did it effectively against Mir, for example.

by Pyrgz Krum on Sep 2, 2010 5:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

ain't that the f'n truth

the closest Maynard has come to finishing a high-level fighter was the armlock (kimura, if i recall correctly) on Roger Huerta.

My first novel, Prodigal, will be released Nov. 2, 2010 ... check out Prodigal on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/Prodigal/132020530174927

Or you can check out my website, http://bobthewriter.com

by bobthewriter on Sep 1, 2010 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wrestlers who use only there wrestling ability to neutralize the fight will only end up losing to top guys. You see in a fight like munoz vs okami that when you rely on only wrestling you will loose all the confidence in yourself if you cant take your opponent down. He kept eating jabs without any striking to respond and constantly going for unsuccessful takedowns. I wish UFC would take from pride and add another judging criteria of trying to finish the fight it is very important. Also a penalty for stalling via positional control and no striking/sub attempts/pass attempts.

by mr. gogoplata on Sep 1, 2010 3:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Finishing matters when your behind on the cards and the only way for you to win is to finish. Aside from that a win by decision is just as good if not better than a win by stoppage. This crap about guys like Edgar fighting safe is just that how are you fighting safe when you are engaging and dictating the fight. People need to get over it and realise that if a guy imposses his will on you either striking or grappling you lost. You don’t like it, no one is holding a gun to your head me i’ll take 100 Frankie’s over 100 Penn’s anyday of the week.

"they mad at me, I keep going hard reppin/
cause what's your Rampage to Rashad Evans/"
-Joe Budden (Something To Ride To)
http://www.zshare.net/audio/76866807deabe3c1/

by Nightwhistler on Sep 1, 2010 6:11 AM EDT reply actions  

disagree

not necessarily in the case of Edgar, who i perceive as at least trying to finish. but a guy like Maynard doesn’t even try, content with controlling position and boring the ever-living shit out of me. it’s a fight, not a 15- or 25-minute hug, dammit.

My first novel, Prodigal, will be released Nov. 2, 2010 ... check out Prodigal on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/Prodigal/132020530174927

Or you can check out my website, http://bobthewriter.com

by bobthewriter on Sep 1, 2010 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you were forced to choose between buying a BJ Penn highlight DVD and a Frankie Edgar highlight DVD, through their first 12 fights (so as not overlapping their two fights together), 100 out of 100 times you’d take the BJ highlight DVD.

by sBruce24 on Sep 2, 2010 3:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd, btw

nice job, Monte Fisto.

My first novel, Prodigal, will be released Nov. 2, 2010 ... check out Prodigal on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/Prodigal/132020530174927

Or you can check out my website, http://bobthewriter.com

by bobthewriter on Sep 1, 2010 8:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Thank you sir

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

GSP is an intersting case

I will say that I — like almost everyone else — am a huge GSP fan. And I certainly have noted his development into a more cautious, methodical fighter in recent years.

I think a couple things set GSP apart though. First, he is always looking to improve his position and finish fights. If Hardy’s bones had been made out of bone, he probably would have ended that one several times. He is never content to lay in guard or just lean up against his opponent on the fence. He is constantly moving and transitioning, which I find exiting to watch.

The second thing, which people don’t seem to want to acknowledge, is that GSP built much of his reputation and his fanbase on a much faster, more dangerous style. He wasn’t called “Rush” for no reason. I don’t know if GSP 2.0 would have captured people’s attention as much as the younger, greener GSP did.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fans also seem to have short memories with GSP...

Four of his past seven wins (basically all of his fights since 2007 minus the Serra loss) have been decisions:

Hardy – Great grappling, should’ve finished him twice but as you mentioned, Hardy’s ability to survive those attempts was unbelievable.

Thiago Alves – Total beatdown, punched him in the mouth, took him down at will, some GnP. The fight was only potentially boring because about 2 minutes in you realize “Alves is the 3rd, maybe 2nd best WW in the world right now, and he has no chance.”

Fitch – GSP was not careful here. Totally brought it and kicked the crap out of Fitch for five rounds, Fitch just wouldn’t give up.

Only his fight with Koscheck was relatively underwhelming, and even then it was kind of shocking to see him beat Kos at his own game. But more often than not, ironically, Maynard’s line about it being hard to finish the best really applies to GSP, who still manages to kick the crap out of the best. Maynard does nothing of the sort nor does he try.

by sBruce24 on Sep 2, 2010 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed. GSP is the only man to drop Alves (aside from Alves walking into a Fitch upkick) and truly pound Penn, he dropped Fitch more than all his other UFC opponents combined, and despite not damaging Hardy, bent his arm in ways that would undoubtedly snap my joints (and most of his training partners, as we saw backstage when he tried to figure out what went wrong).

Anyone who thinks GSP fights have no danger and damage is an idiot.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

And even then, the GSP-Kos fight was actually pretty good, but as I said, nothing on the level of dominance of Alves or Fitch and no instance where he was about to finish. But just a really good fight to watch if you know whats going on.

by sBruce24 on Sep 2, 2010 3:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

and don't forget

that Kos fight was his first after losing to Serra and may have been extra cautious so it wasn’t a repeat. Since then he’s been punishing and looking for finishes in every metting he’s had.

by iddqd on Sep 4, 2010 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good point

In both the Hardy and the Fitch fights especially, we should give serious credit to those two for surviving the hurt that GSP put on them. Many fighters would probably have tapped to the sub attempts that Hardy survived, and many would not have continued through the beating that Fitch took. GSP decisions are not in the same league as Maynard decisions.

But the other part of your point is well taken too, GSP used to be a LOT more exciting. As great a moment as the Serra upset was, I think we have to blame him for ushering in the new, cautious GSP.

I consider myself a softcore fan.

by Thor77 on Sep 2, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Everyone looks more exciting against weaker opponents

GSP’s recent opponents have been way better than the guys he beat up in the past.

The whole Serra thing is overblown. Maybe he was that way against Koscheck, but I think the Fitch fight was his most exciting fight yet, and the Hughes rubber match was great also.

Hardy was only a bit lower on the excitement scale because GSP was determined to get a submission instead of going for GNP. Even Jackson was telling him to pound Hardy, and he did for a bit, but then went searching for submissions again. Still, I saw that fight in a theater and everyone was going nuts during the submission attempts.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Amen to this!

the overall talent level has grown leaps and bounds in recent years. Fewer mis-matched bouts and better overall talent will lead to more close fights, and tough guys like fitch etc are gonna get tougher to finish.

by rearnakedjoke on Sep 2, 2010 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

but GSP actually does some GnP, will attempt submissions to finish the fight and not half ass them to make it look like he is working.

by Easedel on Sep 1, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

The game is continually changing, and it will continue to reach higher bounds as the skills of fighters improve. If that means training more wrestling, then they will have to.

Florian was on the right track, he just started late in life.

by bigweeze on Sep 1, 2010 10:18 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm so conflicted aabout this

On the one hand, I hate decisions. The judges are retarded, the scoring system is broken, a fight isn’t over until someone gets finished, etc. etc. Most decisions I don’t even consider a win or a loss on either side. It bothers me that you can win on a positional advantage without doing any damage. I also don’t like that laying in someone’s guard and hitting them lightly every couple seconds is an acceptable and widely travelled road to victory. And honestly, I haven’t really watched a full Jon Fitch fight in, like, two years.

But on the other hand, MMA should be appreciated as a sport, not just a violent curiosity. When I see people watching football or whatever, they look bored as shit half the time. I can’t even tell if they’re being respectful of skill, or if it’s just a general loyalty to the sport itself. I’m not sure how MMA can cultivate that kind of loyalty, but maybe we need to just swallow our protests and embrace the boring decision. A lot of you already do this for other sports. It’s just harder in MMA because violence changes everything.

And y’all need to quit picking on Frankie. He may not have finished BJ, but he was trying his damndest. I don’t see how that wasn’t a great fight, as long as you’re not a rabid BJ fan (it was not a great fight for me).

"You hear people say, 'You're the greatest,' and all this stuff. It's BS. It's fake, it's all fake. You've just got to keep training as hard as you can. The only thing real is the fight, everything else is fake." - BJ Penn

by crazybones on Sep 1, 2010 11:57 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't disagree with what you're saying.

My main point though is that we shouldn’t have to apologize for liking the violent aspect of MMA. Fighting is the world’s oldest sport and appeals to our most primal nature. It is totally natural for people — especially men — to be drawn to violence and aggression, and MMA provides a healthy, legal outlet for that instinct. If it’s growing in a direction where that aspect of the game is limited, I don’t think it’s wrong to be troubled by that.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s dumb that mainstream media makes a big deal out of MMA, and turns around and says boxing is a “noble” sport or whatever. But again, it’s just a matter of exposure.

"You hear people say, 'You're the greatest,' and all this stuff. It's BS. It's fake, it's all fake. You've just got to keep training as hard as you can. The only thing real is the fight, everything else is fake." - BJ Penn

by crazybones on Sep 1, 2010 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who's making you apologize?

All MMA fans love violence.

What you need to realize is that even when you have decisions, danger is always there. If you watch dangerous acts on Vegas or in the Circus, or even watch NHL or the NFL, you only witness danger coming to fruition once in a while, but the possibility is always there.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

There are some folks in that first camp I described who criticize those of us in the second camp for being brainless thugs who are interested only in carnage.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 2, 2010 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

As some stated already, the biggest problem with decisions, are bad ones. The judges and the criteria they have to work with, are huge problems. That said, I much prefer definitive finishes, to even lopsided, obvious decisions.

I don’t like guys such as Sonnen, Maynard, etc, but it isn’t their job to do anything but win. It is their opponents job to overcome their talents, by implementing gameplans and showing their own talents to be superior.

Also, I believe teh sport to be cyclical and evolving all the time. Wrestling is very dominant right now, but striking may take center stage soon, then be unseated by BJJ again and on and on.

Having dominant fighters from different backgrounds, is what makes MMA great. Seeing fighters overcome what seems to be insurmountable skills of another fighter is what creates the drama. We talk about how dominant Sonnen is (for example), with his wrestling, but he is something like 27-11, proving that he is far from unbeatable. We talk about the greatness of Couture, but he has been on the losing side many times. BJ is considered a great, but we see, even he has his kryptonite. We saw Fedor lose quickly to a BJJ world champ.

Hold on to your seats, as the sport is growing, I imagine we will see styles and fighters changing so rapidly, we will barely be able to keep up.

by BJJDenver on Sep 1, 2010 12:12 PM EDT reply actions  

And...

The last thing I want to see is, the MMA world to go all Tiger Woods and start changing the rules/formats, because one fighter or style has become dominant. This refers to Tiger being so far ahead of teh pack, that they started changing the courses to appeal to his weaknesses.

by BJJDenver on Sep 1, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fighters who can’t get up or secure a sub from the bottom already have standups to save them. That’s a pretty big undeserved advantage right there. More for presentation purposes than anything.

by bigweeze on Sep 1, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

But when guys on the bottom, actively working for subs, lose decisions because the judges think Top Position=Octagon Control, they may need a rule change.

"Deserve's got nothing to do with it." -Will Munny, a known thief and murderer, a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition.

by PapaBumpants on Sep 1, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

But how often does that happen?

In the vast majority of fights that are boring due to inactive wrestlers, the guy on the bottom doesn’t get anything done. No subs attempts, no sweeps, and when it gets stood up they don’t get anything done either.

Also, a lot of the time, the guy being wrestled is a big reason for the inactivity. Look at how Jackson would tightly hug or tie up Rashad instead of going for the sweep on the ground or reversal along the fence.

Defense is a big part of wrestlers not being able to get any GnP going. It’s the same reason that boxing doesn’t have as many KOs as it used to.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

The rules in Massachusetts

do not score submission attempts at all. So you would get zero credit from the judges for working for subs off of your back.

"Deserve's got nothing to do with it." -Will Munny, a known thief and murderer, a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition.

by PapaBumpants on Sep 2, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

with all this finishing guys talk

there will be guys who say “well silva finished chael and hes getting a immediate re-match so why not just ride out descisions”

dont get me wrong i am all for a finish..no bs no questions guy A beat guy B thats that

Warning: PRIDE goggles in use

by gxc on Sep 1, 2010 12:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Great post. Wish I had written it.

"Deserve's got nothing to do with it." -Will Munny, a known thief and murderer, a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition.

by PapaBumpants on Sep 1, 2010 12:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I appreciate the boring, conservative wrestlers because they are helping to evolve the sport

Everything runs in cycles in this sport. No one style stays dominant for very long. This is just an awkward transition period. Eventually, all those boring wrestlers are going to force guys from other disciplines to adapt and get better.

So I say thank you boring lay & pray guy, for forcing everyone else to either evolve or die.

by Steve4192 on Sep 1, 2010 1:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Real Men of Genius!

This one’s for you Mr Boring Lay N Pray Guy!

Guillotine.

by iiowyn on Sep 2, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I just want to see more activeness more than anything else. I thought that Maia vs Miranda was just fine in that Maia was active and trying to finish the fight. I did not particularly appreciate Maynard because he looked to have been purposefully trying to kill the clock at times. There was a takedown of his on Florian where Maynard took down Florian, held him down, the ref threatened to stand the fight up, Maynard would then throw some ground n pound, and go back to holding Florian down. On other takedowns, Maynard would hold Florian down, then throw some ground n pound, and just hold him down again. These parts where Maynard was holding Florian down looked to me as if he were purposefully trying to kill the clock.
In my opinion, I don’t necessarily care about a finish or not, I just care if the fighters are active.
I do however feel that the fighter on the bottom should have a stronger sense of urgency. That is why I liked Feijao against King Mo or Jacare against Tim Kennedy. When they got taken down, they immediately became active to get the fight back standing and also not to be on the bottom. This is where I feel that Kenny Florian was at fault against Maynard.

by chrisbboy82 on Sep 1, 2010 1:44 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Somebody else in this thread said it best

I don’t need to see finishes, but I need to see guys working for finishes. The bout between Sotiropolous and Pelligrino (I figured I’d just misspell both of their names, for fairness) was a great example of a fight that went to a decision in which both fighters were constantly looking to end it.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 1, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly

GSP might be cautious but at least he tries to finish it
maynard, not so much
i think we should bring back the yellow cards

Official Machida Nuthugger.

Cigano, it is your time to avenge your master's loss!

Making the world a better place, one dirtbag at a time.

by CC11 on Sep 1, 2010 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree

There are a plethora of men (and women) in the world currently competing in the sport, who want nothing more than to batter and bludgeon their opposition, walking away with nothing less than a knockout.

These are your Gerald Harris’, Rick Story’s, Cyborg Santos, Diaz brothers, Takanori Gomi, Kenny Florian, and so on and so on. Just because you see two guys on the same card notoriously known for not being able to put their opponents away, doesn’t mean they’re not striving for it, or hindering the sport in any way.

They’re fighting, and in fighting, especially regulated fighting like mixed martial arts, decisions are going to happen regardless of a fighters ability to finish (Wanderlei/Franklin anyone?)

If you honestly think the % of fighters who look to take fights to decisions is that great, you’re mistaken. Everyone wants the finish, but many understand that at the high level of competition (especially in the UFC), it’s not going to happen all the time.

I tried to fart and a lil shit came out. BOINK!

by TheShartist on Sep 2, 2010 12:23 AM EDT reply actions  

I have to side with Gray Maynards comment a few days ago, when he asked how many other people finished the guys he fought? I think if Frank Edgar, Gray Maynard, and Jon Fitch fought on the regional scene, or even against the bottom 3rd of their weight class in UFC all we would here about is this awesome guy who finishes everyone, but these guys are fighting the best in the business everytime out, and using their skill set to do it. Edgar was putting it on BJ a few times in this fight, but BJ has one of the greatest chins in the history of the sport, Machida couldn’t finish him.

by dpk875 on Sep 2, 2010 6:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Those comments were part of what inspired me to post, and I guess needless to say, I didn’t buy it. Maynard is certainly right that he’s faced top flight competition, but in addition to not finishing anyone good, I don’t ever really recall a time when he threatened to finish somebody good. Other than that big sloppy overhand right, he just doesn’t have a lot of ways to put guys away. And when he’s working his ground and “pound” he seems to focus much more on maintaining his position than inflicting damage.

For Edgar, the combination of not having much punching power, being undersized for the division, and not having any submission game to speak of, means that he also doesn’t bring much to the table as far as putting guys away.

Fitch I believe is a BJJ black belt, but he never, ever sacrifices control in order to go for a submission, so the only thing he really has is RNC attempts, since he’d have to stop humping his opponent to get an arm bar.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 2, 2010 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maynard is certainly right that he’s faced top flight competition, but in addition to not finishing anyone good, I don’t ever really recall a time when he threatened to finish somebody good

How quickly they forget the Huerta fight.

Everyone gives GSP credit for ‘trying’ to finish Hardy. Why does Maynard get no credit for an even nastier kimura attempt versus Huerta?

by Steve4192 on Sep 2, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

ouch

I hate it when facts conflict with a good argument.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 2, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

When Edgar faced a good but not great guy like Matt Veach, he not only rocked him with a punch, he then put him down and choked him out. But when your fighting other top guys, they are top guys for a reason, because they can take a punch, and have above average submission defense.

Good point on the Huerta Kimura by Maynard, that was sick, I was waiting for that arm to snap.

by dpk875 on Sep 2, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear what you’re saying to a point. The Maynard gif was a good burn, but the fact remains that the three guys I mentioned have — by any measure — a remarkably bad track record for finishing fights. Strength of schedule only goes so far toward explaining that away. We’re talking about a champion and two number 1 contenders. Their competition is supposed to be tough.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 2, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

They should give Maynard credit for that, but...

That was just one fight. GSP-Hardy is one of GSP’s less exciting fights in the UFC.

Your GIF shows the only time Maynard came close to finishing in the UFC. Still, I can’t believe Huerta got out of that. That’s like 90 degrees more twisting than I could bear.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Your GIF shows the only time Maynard came close to finishing in the UFC

That is patently false.

He was also very close to finishing Rob Emerson before he finished himself instead. Emerson was all but done. Then he KOed Joe Veres in his next fight. He came very close to finishing Denis Siver.in the first round of his next bout (the ref had to warn Siver a couple of times to move or he was going stop it as Maynard was blasting him with ground & pound) before settling for a decision.

Also, the notion he only wins by wrestling is false. His fights with Huerta, Jim Miller and Nate Diaz were predominantly stand & Wang affairs. I’m not a big fan of his one-haymaker-at-a-time striking style, but the guy does elect to stand and trade for long stretches in many of his fights. He is nowhere near the blanket people are making him out to be.

by Steve4192 on Sep 2, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, but those are not very high level fighters, and he is not going to fight such easy opponents ever again.

As for him electing to stand, again, that’s not going to happen again. He probably wouldn’t have beaten Florian that way, risked losing to Diaz for doing that (and many feel he did lose), and the rounds he lost to Huerta (in the eyes of the judges) were from that. I think if he fights Diaz again then it’s going to the ground.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

By all means, feel free to ignore what he has actually done in fights and just concentrate on those things your crystal ball tells you he will do in the future.

by Steve4192 on Sep 2, 2010 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I will be very glad if he proves me wrong. There are a lot of people at LW who can outstrike him, and when the title is on the line, he’s not going to ignore his biggest strength just to prove a point.

I really don’t know what he was doing against Diaz. Stevenson provided a blueprint for beating Nate, and it was taylor made for Maynard, but he ignored it and almost lost his title shot.

by Mint on Sep 2, 2010 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Diaz

is a very disarming fighter, though. Shoot in haphazardly and you might get choked (ask Melvin); you’re also forgetting that Gray got guillotined by Nate before, and considering that he was landing the better shots (IMO) it made sense to just go with what was working. If it aint broke, don’t fix it.

That said, Gray is a smart fighter and good tactician, as evidenced by his undefeated record…

You can read my work over @ http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Sep 2, 2010 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I think the ring becomes a prop for guys like Maynard to stall, and I think kicks and knees to downed opponents would discourage sloppy, slow takedown attempts. On the flip side, I think that a guy like Maynard could also conceivably finish more guys in a Pride system, since he would have more tools at his disposal.

Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.

by Monte Fisto on Sep 2, 2010 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Guard Boys

The reason Maynard, Sonnen, Rashad 3.0 are so incredibly lame is that they rarely look to improve their position. The flashiest their guard passing gets is half guard (easiest position to maintain with low submission risk) since they value being on top more than dealing damage. They rarely go for a sub or posture up to throw hard. It seems like after a non-finishing GSP, Fitch or a fight like Maia/Miranda, there is no question who would win if it went a few more rounds. But the LnP guys make me think if the fight continued that they eventually would get subbed.

I had the feeling that if the fights got extended, Rampage would have KO’d Rashad, Silva would have KO’d Rashad, Diaz would have subbed Maynard, Marquardt would have subbed Sonnen, and A. Silva would have subbed Sonnen….oh wait that one was 5 rounds and he did

by RightTriangle on Sep 3, 2010 2:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Rashad's problem

is that the guys at LHW are quite a bit bigger than him naturally, and since his wrestling style is predicated on explosively driving through guys with double legs, I think that tires him out after the first 2 rounds.

He didn’t have that problem against Forrest because he was kickboxing the whole time, and didn’t take so much punishment that he couldn’t swarm him and seal the deal. But wrestling with guys who are naturally bigger/ stronger than him is what takes so much out of him. I also think that since he is naturally smaller, the muscle he’s put on (while it is functional and doesn’t slow him down) is a bit too much, and eventually gasses him out.

You can read my work over @ http://www.headkicklegend.com/

"I swear it upon Zeus an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler."
-Socrates

by ElliotMatheny on Sep 3, 2010 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would say I’m of the second camp. I don’t like to watch boring fighters play for the judges. I don’t even pay attention. And don’t think I’m some sort of grappling hater, I love grappling and hate boring stand up fights just as much. But, worry not, there is light at the end of the tunnel. Guys like Jon Jones, Cain Velasquez, and Rory Macdonald are showing that the new breed of MMA killer finishes his fights.

Pretty soon fighters are going to understand that every second they are in the cage is a liability and that finishing is good for their health. Either that, or they’re going to find themselves waking up on the canvas wonder what the hell went wrong.

by Futz Brown on Sep 3, 2010 10:03 PM EDT reply actions  

There are a lot of ways to break down Maynard’s game and how technical it is or how its not as bad as it seems. But all I know is that when I see him or Fitch walk to the cage I occupy myself with something else. I know the story already. Takedown, punch from guard, smother, repeat for 3 rounds.

I get that its up to the opponent to do something to stop it from happening, and kudos to these guys for exploiting the rules they are given, but that doesn’t make me feel any less bored.

by iddqd on Sep 4, 2010 2:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support
Warrior_small
MMA Transaction Wire: February 4-10
Bv_small
BE Trivia Night

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings