The Absurd Magnification of B.J. Penn's Failures Doesn't Prove He's Overrated
Much of the talk around the mixed martial arts community has revolved heavily around the outcome of Saturday night's lightweight battles on the UFC 118 main card. B.J. Penn's disappointing loss at the hands of Frankie Edgar has not only shaken up the apex of the division, but it has also produced many questions as to what the division will look like in the future. While some of my fellow writers have discussed the potential fights in the future, Jonathan Snowden focused on a question that some fans have been asking themselves in the aftermath -- Is B.J. Penn overrated?
The raw numbers stand out like a sore thumb. In title fights, BJ Penn is a pedestrian 5-5-1. For every big fight he wins, he loses one in turn. The true greats of the sport, your Georges St. Pierres, your Matt Hughes, your Frank Shamrocks, your Fedor Emelianenkos, are defined by rising to the occasion. When the fights get tougher, these men only get better. Not so with BJ Penn.
BJ Penn is a front runner. We learned that for the first time against Jens Pulver at UFC 35. Crowned as champion before even stepping into the cage, Penn had no answer for Pulver's heart and determination. When the fight got to the point where it demanded each man expose his very soul to walk away the winner, Penn faltered. Pulver stepped forward. That was the difference.
The disparity among fans involved in the conversation is interesting. Some agree that Penn is overrated with supporting evidence stemming from what Snowden has laid out. Penn is 5-5-1 in title fights, and he hasn't had the success that the greats of the sport have because he hasn't "risen to the occasion".
What exactly does overrated mean? It means we've rated him too highly, and for many fans -- that's definitely the case. Penn isn't the indestructible or the invincible, but neither is any fighter in today's era of mixed martial arts. Fedor is now beatable. Lesnar isn't a Stone Golem who can't be hurt. With the amount of skill at the top of each and every division in the UFC, it's tough to imagine anyone rating someone as unbeatable.
Let's look at the supporting evidence though. At 5-5-1 in title fights, we could argue that Penn just doesn't have what it takes to rise to the occasion and become a true legend of the sport. But does that define him as overrated? I would say that being involved in eleven title fights over the course of your career would be enough evidence to suggest that you aren't overrated by any means. In fact, that's the opposite of overrated unless you're suggesting the Penn is the greatest fighter to have ever graced the Octagon. Eleven title fights would suggest that you are at the apex of the division all the time, and that would make him one of the best in the sport.
Styles make fights, and Edgar happens to have the speed and footwork to frustrate Penn to no end. Maynard has already proven he can be the kryptonite to Edgar's speed. And Penn has proven in the past that he can bomb wrestlers before they have the opportunity to put him on his back. As Sergio Non pointed out, it's a stylistic triangle at the top of the division. Penn could be champion once again by the middle of next year and pull off a victory over Edgar in a third battle. Would he still be considered overrated?
Give me a break. Penn has fought the best of the best for his entire career, and he's performed well against almost all comers. We're talking about a guy who basically figured out how to beat on Lyoto Machida four or five years before anybody else could figure it out. A guy who went up a weight class to battle some of the most dominant fighters of this era. A man who put epic beatings on some of the best fighters in this sport. I'm not going to go so far as to say he's the greatest ever, but he's certainly not overrated.
360 comments
|
10 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bj presents a strange puzzle
He is both loved and hated unlike any fighter in the sport. I have found myself in total awe of his abilities yet at the same time been complety frustrated by his lack of motivation. His fanbase reminds me of the Taliban in thier unwavering dedication His hatred hate him just as much however. Hence the last two blog entries which show the point perfectly. Haters and lovers of bj. Were one and the same
by AndrewBlakesley on Aug 31, 2010 12:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Meaning both sides go too far...like the Fedor nuthuggers and haters:
Fedor hater: “Any heavyweight who fights in the UFC would destroy Fedor…”
Fedor nuthugger: “Fedor could easily beat Lesnar and Cain…at the same time…”
BJ’s biggest haters & nuthuggers are almost as extreme…
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 1:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Sandwiches sandwich him
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on Aug 31, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
BJ is such a great personality for MMA.
He’s a cool Hawaiian dude with unbelievable MMA skills, great fighting instincts, and an undying level of confidence. His career is eminently debatable.
by Manzanillos Cup on Aug 31, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Fedor isnt even in the top p4p after his last loss so im not surprised if BJ Penn is now being cast as an overrated fighter. Thats the name of the game MMA fans love you til you lose then they act like your some kind of bum
by Papercut Elbow on Aug 31, 2010 12:11 PM EDT reply actions
Problem with BJ is
he lost consistently in the fights that mattered most. (His rematches against BJ Penn, GSP, and Matt Hughes)
Turning guys like Joe Stevenson into a bloody pulp is impressive but if you can’t come up with a win when it is really important you aren’t the best which is what many MMA fans bill him as.
I think Snowden's post-UFC PPV pieces are some kind of performance art
by Polyhedron on Aug 31, 2010 12:11 PM EDT reply actions 14 recs
LOL.
"In this fight, Anderson showed he was human," Nogueira said. "He showed he could be weak. But he showed he is a fighter and he brings something from his heart. It was beautiful."
by Broke Lesnar on Aug 31, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
UFC 119 (Mir def. Cro Cop): Is Mirko Cro-Cop the biggest UFC bust in history?
Or alternatively..
(Cro Cop def. Mir): Cro-Cop win proves PRIDE still has something left.
Toronto FC - Where road games are forfeited and we STILL have no idea how to play from behind.
You know what's funny?
The title to the first one with Mir beating Cro Cop is exactly something that he would write.
And you know what? He would be right to do so. Because it would be true.
Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko
by Geno Mrosko on Aug 31, 2010 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions
He's a company troll
You gotta bring in those ‘hits’ baby
Jon Jones LHW Champion 2011
Gray and Pray LW Champion 2011
The real question should be
does the UFC really have top LW talent? I wouldnt be surprised if BJ left the UFC
by Papercut Elbow on Aug 31, 2010 12:12 PM EDT reply actions
Solid question, but who’s out there who can compete?
We’ve had this same discussion, and Alvarez and Melendez always come up. Honestly, Alvarez can be outwrestled by the UFC’s best lightweight wrestlers. Melendez is interesting though. I wouldn’t mind seeing what he can do, but I think he’s beatable as well.
Ultimately, I think the UFC houses the best of the best at lightweight.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Last weeks fights made Kenny Florian look bad as well and hes supposed to be at the top of the LW div.
by Papercut Elbow on Aug 31, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Honestly, I think people are overlooking the fact that Maynard looked improved to me. His striking didn’t look great when he tried to throw those looping overhands, but his control on the ground looked great.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
He didn't look more well rounded or like a better fighter, per say/
He did look to be a better top control fighter who can throw three body shots when he’s told to work.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Aug 31, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
he has great standing posture (stifles open guard)
His take Downs looked great
by the-gentle-way on Aug 31, 2010 1:34 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He significantly outstruck Kenny standing. That should count for something, unless you think Kenny’s standup sucks.
"If a dick don't get hard offa cocaine, what would you axe it?" O.D.B.
"To be is to be the value of a bound variable." W.V.O Quine
"I shoot. I score. He shoots. I score." Dan Gable.
by The Darkness on Aug 31, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Maynard is the future at LW, like it or not
And if he is training BJJ where he can become an elite MMA Wrestler as opposed to the elite wrestler who has adapted it well to MMA that he is now.
Once that happens, if that happens, when combined with his size and strength, he will likely be a fixture at LW for the foreseeable future.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 1:56 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Aldo Aldo Aldo (crosses fingers)
Toronto FC - Where road games are forfeited and we STILL have no idea how to play from behind.
Right...but heresy that it might be,
And great as he may be, I don’t see Aldo beating Maynard, BJ or Edgar…
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 2:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
One thing that somewhat sucks is that UFC 118 put an end to the Penn Nuthuggery.
I mean, before there was this lively debate about HOW GREAT BJ Penn was and that all his losses could be explained away.
Now that he’s lost it’s fair to say, wait a second, perhaps those explanations weren’t correct. Perhaps we were being affected by the nuthuggery.
watchkalibrun.com
BJ is still great to me
Frankie is just that guy who has his number, that’s all. Plus BJ’s whole thing about doing a lot of resting to prepare for Edgar wasn’t the best strategy in the world. I think he’s just regressed into the whole not training thing and needs to get Marv Marinovich to kick him in the ass again.
The nuthuggery never stops...
Penn is still to me one of if not the most entertaining and best fighters around. Frankie Edgar won this fight and what does that mean to me as a fan? That Edgar is even more legit than I thought he was before. This loss does not make me under value Penn in the least it just showed me how talented Frankie really is. Fighters lose fights, shit happens, Penn is still great.
"Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherf**ker" - Jules Winnfield
"A good word that I got from the Mike Tyson Documentary... I'm going to absolutley decimate this motherf**ker, I haven't been in the dictionary to see what it actually means but I'm guessing it's going to be something in the way of just killing a motherf**ker." -Paul Daley (on the definition of Decimate)
by WeaponElDeem on Aug 31, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 7 recs
Nuthuggery never dies
Some guy on here the other day was arguing that Royce would have beaten Hughes if he was younger! I mean a real honest to goodness Gracie nuthugger, straight off the Sherdog forums. It was charming.
Yeah it can be kind of amusing and clearly people can get blinded by their manlove of a certain fighter, but I think the wide range of opinions make the sport and especially the discussions so interesting.
"Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherf**ker" - Jules Winnfield
"A good word that I got from the Mike Tyson Documentary... I'm going to absolutley decimate this motherf**ker, I haven't been in the dictionary to see what it actually means but I'm guessing it's going to be something in the way of just killing a motherf**ker." -Paul Daley (on the definition of Decimate)
by WeaponElDeem on Aug 31, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
royce had already had many surgeries by that fight.
His shoulder was shot. He had a botched epidural that caused paralysis for several weeks. Plus he wasn’t training with his brothers for that fight. I am not saying a young Royce would have beat Matt but I am not saying he wouldn’t.
by the-gentle-way on Aug 31, 2010 3:03 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I'll bite
Royce at his best was a great BJJ player with no takedowns and rudimentary striking. This archetype is not typically successful, especially against a powerful wrestler who is good at the submission game.
Royce was impressive in the early days, and him and his family managed to show the success of their grappling style early on, but Royce was a holdout from the “style vs. style” days, and nothing more. Even a fairly 2 dimensional guy like Hughes still has a whole dimension over a one dimensional guy like Royce.
Oh I see
It’s a good and evil thing.
Next time, put Leland’s article first, it’s better for everyone’s blood pressure.
We are our own. I write what I want, Snowden writes what he wants. We aren’t a committee. I just happened to arrive late to the party. I’m on vacation.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
With this many writers, it’s obvious we will have opposite views. Makes for better discussion.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Thank you Leland
You are helping to remind me why I loved Bloody Elbow in the first place.
Solid analysis without ridiculous jumps in logic.
"Deserve's got nothing to do with it." -Will Munny, a known thief and murderer, a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition.
by PapaBumpants on Aug 31, 2010 12:15 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
What exactly does overrated mean? It means we’ve rated him too highly, and for many fans — that’s definitely the case.
Let’s look at the supporting evidence though. At 5-5-1 in title fights, we could argue that Penn just doesn’t have what it takes to rise to the occasion and become a true legend of the sport.
Your own article doesn’t support your conclusion.
I’m not going to go so far as to say he’s the greatest ever, but he’s certainly not overrated.
Here’s a hint: if much of your argument focuses on how brave he was and how CLOSE he came, how despite losses its so super just to BE in a title fight…you are talking about an athlete who came up just short. Are the Jim Kelly Buffalo Bills an all-time great football team?
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
The Bills didn’t win 5 super bowls and lose 5. If they had, they’d be considered an all-time great. Bad analogy, dude.
http://www.instrength.com
by Tim Burke on Aug 31, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
Is Dan Marino an all-time great quarterback?
we each must become like fishermen, and go out on to the dark ocean of mind, and let your nets down into that sea
by Barack Lesnar on Aug 31, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Comparing team sports to MMA or boxing is always pointless. But yes, Marino is an all-time great.
http://www.instrength.com
Does Charlie Daniels play a mean fiddle?
"Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherf**ker" - Jules Winnfield
"A good word that I got from the Mike Tyson Documentary... I'm going to absolutley decimate this motherf**ker, I haven't been in the dictionary to see what it actually means but I'm guessing it's going to be something in the way of just killing a motherf**ker." -Paul Daley (on the definition of Decimate)
by WeaponElDeem on Aug 31, 2010 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
They went to 4. ;-)
Toronto FC - Where road games are forfeited and we STILL have no idea how to play from behind.
There isn’t an argument of how close he came. He came and conquered five times. Jim Kelly didn’t. He came and failed. To discount those past wins is ludicrous. To say he’s overrated is ludicrous. To say he isn’t a legend, there’s some points to be made there.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
He’s overrated if the consensus is that he’s a legend. Which it was. Which you are admitting he may not be. You are arguing in your own world.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Leland Rolling's
argument is much fairer than your’s is.
You are just trying to pick apart his fair reasoning,which is quite unreasonable really.
by Matt Mosley on Aug 31, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 11 recs
In all fairness, if Snowden's 2nd article had been written by someone else on staff (aside from KN)
It wouldn’t have received nearly the inflamed hate it did…
Some people seem to just reflexively attack anything Snowden or, to a lesser degree Nate, has to offer.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 2:16 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I’m sorry, I can’t say that he may or may not be a legend and that he isn’t overrated against your argument that he is undoubtedly overrated?
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 9 recs
I think this is the 1st mistake in any judgement of a fighter
The term Legend while a fighter is still active. I have never been able to fully embrace the practice.
by SimplePsych on Aug 31, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
is ARod a legend in baseball?
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
i don't agree at all
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
absent the steroid era
and you’re 110% correct IMO. I just think that all of the greats of the steroid era (mcgwire, arod, bonds, sosa) who achieved historic feats will be grouped into one category: the “legendary” steroid era, which diminishes their accomplishments in the eyes of public opinion.
I think that we see that because we are living that era. But when, in comparison to the amphetamine era of the 80s/ 90s, eventually the buzz of the roid era will die down and people will truly appreciate all of their talents.
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Is Brett Favre a legend?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions
He didn't even make it
Clearly overrated.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Brett Favre is without any doubt Overrated...
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm glad I'm not alone here
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Where is the consensus that he is a legend?
by SimplePsych on Aug 31, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
I haven't seen it either.
I think the consensus on BJ Penn is that he is:
- a legend to few
- a villain to many
- a fighter who was above the evolutionary curve of the sport
- a fighter who could have been more if he was more focused
- one of the best if not the best LW ever
hahahahahahaha
this is getting ridiculous. people who have different viewpoints are in their own little worlds, even other writers on this staff.
I think you should think about usurping MostDiabolicalHater’s sn.
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
A legend is a legend because people believe the legend to be true...
Your opinion (which I believe is in the minority) doesn’t counteract that.
This legend talk is silly though, because I haven’t heard much of that outside of a few wing nut hardcore BJ Penn fans.
Just for the sake of fun:
leg·endAssuing you opinion as factual truth and that BJ Penn isn’t that good. It sounds like BJ Penn may be close to legendary status.
a nonhistorical or unverifiable story handed down by tradition from earlier times and popularly accepted as historical.
by truck on Aug 31, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Pot, meet kettle.
You are arguing in your own world.
"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse
by Chris Barton on Aug 31, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
mr snowden
please stop writing about mma and go back to doing whatever you did before when id never heard of you
by bundt on Aug 31, 2010 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
funny that you dont think bravery is a characteristic that the GOAT
Needs to have.
by the-gentle-way on Aug 31, 2010 4:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
This
is a much more well balanced and realistic piece on BJ’s standing in the sport,imo.
by Matt Mosley on Aug 31, 2010 12:19 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
and since were talking about the greatest LWs in history.
I think that guy on the right of your avatar deserves that distinction. :P
by Anton Tabuena on Aug 31, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Well,
he only fought at lightweight once (agaisn’t David Diaz).
I’d say Manny is one of the greatest super feather or featherweights of all time.
Unless you meant Floyd.He’s on the left. :)
by Matt Mosley on Aug 31, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
If you meant Floyd,personally i’d put Duran and Benny Leonard ahead of him but yeah i’d say he’s up there.
Lightweight or super feather.
by Matt Mosley on Aug 31, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I was only half serious.
and I should’ve left out the ‘LW’ part of that line so I wouldn’t have to get bucked on technicalities. :P
by Anton Tabuena on Aug 31, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Heads up: He's Philipino talking about Manny.
Reason is not necessary, MANNY IS KING (or a congressman or some shit).
Just taking the easy joke, Anton. Loves ya.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Ah,he's Phillipino?
that explains it. :)
by Matt Mosley on Aug 31, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m picking Manny in the fight by the way,should it ever get made.
Fraud,i mean Floyd needs to stop running!
by Matt Mosley on Aug 31, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
My heart picks Manny but my head picks Floyd.
I see Manny taking rounds 2-4 after a dull first and then getting shut down. Floyd’s fundamentals and ring IQ is too freakin’ good for me to realistically pick against him. They way he can adjust even through adversity and still be mentally in a fight is a rare talent. But I hope he shoulder rolls straight into hook.
That said, I don’t care much anymore. I play the fight in my head and think that’s the closest I’ll ever get to seeing it while either is still relevant. But if it does miraculously come together early next year, I’ll mark out and watch the fuck out of it.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
I understand why most are picking Floyd but the bookies have this close for a reason.
Mosley hurt Floyd worse than i’ve ever seen and Manny has more speed and just as much power and wouldn’t let him off the hook like Shane,at 38,did,imo.
It could turn out like you say but i have learnt not to ever count Manny out again.
Man, you have no idea how quick I jumped out of my chair for that punch.
Shocking, amazing, and I thought he was gonna hit the mat. His recovery and adjustments counts as one of the most impressive moments of his career for me. Most guys with an ego like him would have been broken by that punch, but he found a way to make Mosley look old and bad for the rest of the night. Terrifying talent.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
I agree to an extent and Floyd show guts but part of the reason for that was because Shane didn’t follow up when he had Floyd hurt.
He took his foot of the gas.
yup.
Mosley was the one initiating the clinch even. He just stopped attacking.
by Anton Tabuena on Aug 31, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
you cant overlook the fact that Floyd's trainers are unavailable
Floyd’s uncle is in legal trouble and his father is ill…we may still see this fight in the future
Keep dreaming, Matt
Maybe one day…
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on Aug 31, 2010 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Thank you
I have been less than pleased with the writing as of late on BE. But hope springs eternal!.
by SimplePsych on Aug 31, 2010 12:20 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
so aside from the BJ Penn article, what other articles didn't you like?
(I’m serious)
by Anton Tabuena on Aug 31, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
This from the guy who said he had a source that said the fix was in on Toney/Couture. Develop some standards for yourself before you start knocking others.
"If the commission would sanction it and Dana would move, I’d fighter Anderson right now."
- Chael Sonnen at the post fight press conference following his loss to Anderson Silva.
Support independent artists
http://worldisart365.blogspot.com/
by Worldisart on Aug 31, 2010 12:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 4 recs
1st of all, your trolling and have been reported as such
2nd, you are a liar. That is not what I wrote. 3rd, would you like me to start quoting your past comments out of context on articles that have nothing to do with them?
I'm not trolling
Merely illustrating your standards. You said you had both read an article (that you refused to reference) and had an “inside source” that indicated that the fix was in on the fight. There were a half dozen other people who called you out on it. You want to deny that that happened, go ahead, but you aren’t fooling anyone.
"If the commission would sanction it and Dana would move, I’d fighter Anderson right now."
- Chael Sonnen at the post fight press conference following his loss to Anderson Silva.
Support independent artists
http://worldisart365.blogspot.com/
Again, you lie
I did not say I read an article. I said I viewed a rumor on another site, and I rather would not mention it, I did not say how or by what means, I also said that I asked 2 persons I knew in the boxing a book games and they confirmed they heard it too. You have decided to embark on personal internet witch hunt and you aren’t fooling anyone either sir, there are many on here including staff who know who I am I don’t bullshit. The site was yahoo and they are a bit on the lame side and not always the most reliable. But when the idea presented itself I speculated on it as a possibility, you don’t have to agree punk. Just don’t act like a punk, that’s all.
I have accumulated some quotes from your past comments now, and you can bet that they will be getting replied to your future ones, you want to be an internet punk?, you aren’t the only one that can do it.
You’re kind of full of shit here.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
As always, the bastion of logic comes in and saves the day. Thanks Leland. No hyperbole, no picking particular stats to build a case around – just logic.
http://www.instrength.com
by Tim Burke on Aug 31, 2010 12:23 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
Some people feel that strong beliefs, even if there isn’t strong evidence for these beliefs, beats out logic.
by chrisbboy82 on Aug 31, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Logically, those people are wrong.
by HarmlessNinja on Aug 31, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Those people start wars
Then the logical people fix the mess they leave.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on Aug 31, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
They’re all the same people.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito Ortiz on Vitor Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Sep 1, 2010 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions
I have to agree...
That the use of the term overrated is a wrong. Let’s be honest, if BJ Penn had the mental dedication, training and fight camps that someone like GSP has, I have no doubt in my mind he would be unbeatable. Sadly, if things stay the course, BJ will be remembered as a very good fighter that could have been so much more. I believe if he applied himself properly and came with the best resources behind him, he could be a threat in quite a few weight divisions.
I’m not a BJ Penn fan by any stretch but I would be remiss as an MMA fan to not see his natural skillset, killer instinct and innate fighting pedigree. That aside, he’s probably the biggest victim of his own ego. He’s more oft than not, he’s complacent, egotistical and almost exists in a mindset where he believes his own hype. His ego train started chugging back into the limelight, in the days of the second Matt Hughes fight wearing a T-shirt that said “The REAL champ is back” and got soundly beat out in a crucifix. He seemed to be on the right track with regards to his dedication to his craft working with the Marinovich team but someone mentioned the other day, he no longer trains with them. I haven’t dug that deep to be honest. He seems like a totally different fighter removed from his wins a year ago.
Let’s be honest, very few of the exceptionally good fighters ever leave their first camp wholly, most times they just add coaches or disciplines. A guy like Rich Franklin still trains with Grugel but has added Matt Hume’s philosophy to his game plan. GSP started with Tristar, then added Phil Nurse & Greg Jackson. BJ, has for as long as I remember, kept his camps in Hilo and trained with his lifelong training partners & coaches. So are we simply seeing another example of the “game” catching up to a fighter? Has the fight game evolved around BJ enough that while his talent is top shelf, his methods are just antiquated by today’s standards? Does he need to do 8-12 weeks @ Xtreme Couture and and add some more strategy to his game plan? I would hope Penn and his inner circle of people will seek the answer, making the decision accordingly.
BJ Penn will always be a force, a threat and a perennial contender.
It’s up to him to establish his path to greatness we all know he’s capable of. It’s just tragic to see such raw, pure talent go to waste from lack of conviction to his craft.
Play Hard, Train Harder
by dj_krisko on Aug 31, 2010 12:26 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
BJ, much like Fedor, evolved well ahead of the curve, but then reached a point and stopped. The key difference between the 2 is while BJ sought to challenge himself to the detriment of his record, Fedor chooses to protect his record at the expense of the fans – which is the smarter course, idk…
The BJ that fought GSP was essentially the exact same guy both times, whereas GSP had greatly evolved as a professional fighter in and out of the cage.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 2:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Eleven title fights would suggest that you are at the apex of the division all the time, and that would make him one of the best in the sport.
Untrue. The nature of the title fight is clear cut in the abstract, but the reality is far more ambiguous. Title fights are given just as often based on circumstance (if not more so) as they are to those considered worthy. A problem that arises (one I would refer to as the Couture Effect) is that they snowball. One title shot+ popularity= more title shots. That is to say with the right amount of popularity, it is far easier to earn more title shots after the first than it would be by skill alone (see Fitch, Jon). So to suggest that he is the apex of his division based on that alone seems misleading.
by Chris Pressler on Aug 31, 2010 12:27 PM EDT reply actions
But he is at the top, or at least always in the discussion as a top fighter in the division who will achieve a shot at the title in the future. When’s the last time we actually talked about BJ as a middle of the pack fighter? We never have really.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
This is a guy who was granted a title shot after a loss. Twice!
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Randy Couture's legacy has no problem with that
"Deserve's got nothing to do with it." -Will Munny, a known thief and murderer, a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition.
by PapaBumpants on Aug 31, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 8 recs
Hey look, a stat with no context. First time, GSP was hurt and couldn’t take the fight, so the other guy in the # 1 contender’s fight was granted the shot. Second time was off what most people call a BS decision. Using these statements ultimately fails because everyone knows why these things happened. There were perfectly logical reasons for both times.
http://www.instrength.com
by Tim Burke on Aug 31, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 11 recs
Is there any reason this statement is made without analyzing every title shot? It’s curious you use the line of “fact without context” on two title shots, but neglect to do so on the other 9.
by Chris Pressler on Aug 31, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
This statement was made in response to
This is a guy who was granted a title shot after a loss. Twice!
Why would I analyze the other 9 in this context?
http://www.instrength.com
Apologies, I misinterpreted the context of what you said.
by Chris Pressler on Aug 31, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Completely agreed.
See what I mean by subversive?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
are serious?
Your problem is that you worry more about records and titles than you do the fights. The belts are just Jewellery.
I have seen everyone of Bj’s fights. I know which ones he has lost and which ones he has won. I didn’t need judges to tell me if he won or lost. I watched the fights.
In most peoples eyes he is 1-1 with Hughes, 1-1 pulver ( I think he got robbed in that decision ), 1-1 gsp and now 1-1 Edgar. And he took a round in the Machida fight. That’s something no one could do in the Ufc until Shogun. If you aren’t impressed by Bj you aren’t paying attention.
by the-gentle-way on Aug 31, 2010 1:54 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
In most people's eyes?!? I think not...
The Pulver decision might have been somewhat questionable perhaps, but that’s the nature of MMA.
As for the others, if that had been anybody except BJ (well, anybody without a huge nuthugger following), there would have been no controversy.
The GSP fight looked close at first watch, but upon rewatching it was fairly scored.
The first Edgar fight was not really all that close, and as I mentioned before, if that had been say Edgar-Sherk with the exact same fight there would have been zero controversy.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 2:53 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
well alot of peoples
And I have watched gsp vs. Penn 1 like 25 times. I gave it to Bj. But I think a take down that lands you in somebody’s guard should be neutral. Because the guard is a neutral position.
by the-gentle-way on Aug 31, 2010 3:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
But the point of a takedown is to put someone where they did not want to go, as it is for pulling guard. As such, even if the next step from a takedown is a neutral position, it is a rare day indeed when both guys want their respective positions in guard at the exact same moment.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Sep 1, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Here's what I think,
Sure, there’s a million and one reasons why you could say that BJ Penn’s career could’ve been greatER, but there isn’t a single (valid) reason to say that the two division world champ’s career isn’t great already.
Frankie has a chance to be known as the greatest LW ever, but at this point in time, that distinction belongs to BJ Penn.
by Anton Tabuena on Aug 31, 2010 12:30 PM EDT reply actions 5 recs
The Bully will beat Frankie,
then BJ will beat the Bully and the cycle will continue. See LHW belt.
This three way triangle at the top of LW is a pretty hasty forecast
Edgar is a waaay better fighter than he was 2 1/2 years ago. And I don’t see how it’s a given that the current version of Penn handles a fighter like Maynard who comes into the cage at 180 or some ridiculous weight.
by Manzanillos Cup on Aug 31, 2010 12:31 PM EDT reply actions
"overrated" is completely subjective based on who is rating them
so if you had him pegged as a very good fighter who isn’t necessarily one of the top 5 of all time (or whatever you had him pegged as), then he’s not overrated. But if you think he IS one of the top 5 or whatever, then he is overrated.
So, he is and he isn’t overrated.
"The only freakshow's the one in my pants"
-James Toney
by chasethegoose on Aug 31, 2010 12:37 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
In my opinion, hes the most talented fighter to ever step in the Octagon. Concrete chin (Ive never seen him even wobbled from a blow), devastating power, impenetrable TD defense, ironclad top control, cant be even threatened with a sub, unstoppable takesdowns (when he chooses to use them) etc etc etc. Every single physical attribute you could ever want from a fighter, BJ has it. Unfortuinately, hes amongst the most mentally flawed fighters I’ve ever seen. Lack of dedication to training, only seems to care about (in his mind) the big fights, total frontrunner in the cage, among the worst gameplanning fighters I’ve ever seen. Every negative mental attribute you would want in a fighter, BJ has it. Thus results the neverneding tug of war between BJ’s overwhelming talent and underwhelming mental approach to the game. The fact that Diego lasted 5 rounds about being nearly decapitated in the 1st round, or Florian nullifying the most talented fighter in the game for 4 rounds by merely holding him against the cage, or BJ refusing to go for TDs against a guy (edgar) who people have been able to take down at will in the past…..his mental approach and gameplans are simply bizarre.
The only one overrated is Johnathan Snowden
I have waited, and waited to post. It hardly does much good…and I’d like not to post on forums when the subject has me all worked up. But, Snowden can push my buttons like no one has. There are two points I would try and make:
1 – Johnathan Snowden is a professional troll. Simply put, if Penn had beaten Edgar, his article wouldn’t have been posted. Instead, it would have been “Penn shows Edgar is indeed too small for 155, is a flash in the pan”. People can only hope to troll on Snowden’s level. When he feels he has to call into a radio show to justify his stance…it brings together memories of a certain judge.
2 – Penn is not overrated. He has a product of his own environment. Penn is the 155 version of Rampage (I’m talking fighting…not personal life). The guy survived for years on pure, raw talent. When most people he fought early in his career didn’t have a training camp, or even know what one was. Once he ran into Matt Hughes…that changed. Bj admitted before the rematch with Edgar he didn’t train overly hard, because I’m afraid he still thinks he doesn’t have to.
When you ask “Which BJ will show up”…you can’t call him overrated. Because you can’t rate something that is a mystery until it performs.
by Clownshoes on Aug 31, 2010 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 13 recs
When Nate (for example) makes a post countering Snowden’s article…and after 2 hours he has, 80-100 replies…and Snowden has 500 in the first 30 minutes…it really becomes obvious what he is.
“Haters gotta hate”
I think it's reached the point
where people specifically search out Snowden’s articles as they are posted expecting to either A. vehemently disagree with an absurd argument or B. comment about how great it is that Snowden wrote an article that wasn’t a (seemingly, not looking to get banned here) thinly-veiled troll job. Either way, I imagine the site trackers would show a surge in traffic to his articles as soon as they are posted. I find that I often immediately click on Snowden’s article simply to rubberneck. I’m pretty sure others do as well. Either way, it leads to more site traffic on BE, and I’m definitely not complaining.
Snowden’s writing style reminds me of a die-hard intellectual Kobe Bryant fan/apologist. When it comes to certain things (historical articles, fight previews) he is extremely well-versed and intelligent. However, when it comes to others (contemporary analysis), there are only extremes (compare the “how wonderful Captain America was for being a legend and beating up Mr. Toney” vs the “BJ Penn is overrated!” and “Brock Lesnar and Shane Carwin were terrible!” articles)
"The mat is my church, the ground is my heaven, Jiu-Jitsu is my religion. And once you hit the ground you're in my world..."
I can agree with that
For me, I have about an 80% success rate for knowing of Snowden wrote it based on the title alone.
My mood depends on if I read it. Sometimes I simply can’t deal with a guy who always has to stir the pot for the sake of it. Sure, there needs to be some ripples here and there and I’m all for someone taking a “from left field” approach.
But with him…it’s always a downer. I haven’t seen a positive article outta him, and would challenge him to write one. So much of what he writes is “this fight was crap” “this fighter is crap” or “why this thing sucked/is going to suck”.
He is absolutely the “heel” of Bloodyelbow whether anyone wants to admit it or not. Which is why I find his distaste for Chael so damn confusing.
Jesus christ, why do I always end up defending fucking Snowden.
He’s never written anything positive? How about his glowing article about how Chuck Liddell is the greatest LHW of all time, despite his recent skid? Or recently heaping praise on Randy Couture as an elder statesman of the sport?
Get the fuck out of here with that shit. You’re hyperbole is just as bad as the caricature of Snowden that you’ve created.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Aug 31, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
"Jesus christ, why do I always end up defending fucking Snowden."
Whoa whoa whoa let’s not bring his sex life in this…
Toronto FC - Where road games are forfeited and we STILL have no idea how to play from behind.
by SSreporters on Aug 31, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
And before I get in trouble for this
It’s not a swipe at Snowden, it’s how often the placement of the F-word in conversation is made to sound sexual.
Toronto FC - Where road games are forfeited and we STILL have no idea how to play from behind.
Anyways
Enough on that. From what I’m reading…people who rag on Snowden too much get banned. While I’m sure it’s not rocket science to get back on here…I’m not looking to make that much work outta it.
Well Stated
I wonder, did you receive a warning from Bloody Elbow for calling Snowden a name like Troll? I sure as hell did. I believe your post is pretty accurate, and agree that I too shouldn’t post on topics that get me worked up.
I’ve given Snowden the benifit of the doubt for a long time and have been trying to read his posts with an open mind. I just can’t anymore and now just completely boycott reading or trying to read the blog posts from readers on his articles.
Leland is a great writer. Not because I agree with him. It’s how he collects his facts together well in his articles while putting together a well informed and persuasive opinion that challenges me on occasion or educates at the least.
by KillerInstinct on Aug 31, 2010 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions
let's have a discussion about a hypothetical fighter
Called “BJ the lightweight.”
This fighter is currently 14-3-1. He is 4-3-1 in title fights.
He has beaten every great LW of his era, including Gomi, who was ruling the other major fight promotion. He avenged one of his losses (against Pulver) and had a victory over his opponent in the non-decision (to Uno). He was undefeated for about eight years, fighting a little over twice a year during that span (on average).
He has recently suffered back to back losses (in title fights) against the same fighter. The first time he lost, it was by a very controversial decision (Fightmetric had him winning). The second time he lost convincingly, but again it was a decision, and he was never being close to being finished.
He is currently 31 and other than the fighter who has beaten him, he would probably (at the very least) be extremely competitive with any other fighter at his weight in the world, including the champions of other promotions and the #1 contender in the UFC.
Are you seriously telling me this man is not a great fighter?
“Overrated” is subjective. If everyone is saying someone cannot lose, well, he’s overrated – because anyone can lose. But BJ is one of the all time greats and if you think different because he spent years screwing around (with fairly good results) in heavier weight classes, you are wrong. Plain and simple.
by Clifford J on Aug 31, 2010 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 9 recs
BJ the LW has also never been finished
Oh my god. I mean, I could go on, but I think we all get the point.
That is why we need to give him
Guillard and Stephens. immediately
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
yup, or have his head knocked off
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
i don't really care if he gets back to the title or not
i’m not a huge BJ fan. But I think that him losing is awesome because it enables Silva to make really awesome fan friendly matchups in the meantime, because the fighters won’t have had to earn a title shot.
This gives room for Melvin and Lil Heathen, and other really exciting guys
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
plus they're going to be 3 rounders
so his cardio won’t matter as much
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Snowden will eventually write a piece for every great fighter on why they are actually worthless pieces of crap because that is what Snowden does.
by Dropkick434 on Aug 31, 2010 12:55 PM EDT reply actions 6 recs
Lol... Who has made the list so far?
Penn
Carwin
Lesnar
Sarah Kaufman
Plus he took out the whole WEC roster all at once so we can add:
Aldo
Faber
Mike Brown
Torres
Have I missed anyone?
I like how you include Penn in a group with Sarah Kaufman, Carwin, and Mike Brown. That’s harsher than anything I wrote.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Here's a list
People that are pissing me off right now with the stuff they’re saying:
Glen Beck, Sarah Palin and Jonathan Snowden.
The “included in a group” thing is a cute rhetorical device, but nothing more. How do you like your group?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Aug 31, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
BJ is an all time great.
As a technician, as a scrapper, as a character… he is easily one of the top fighters of the sport’s history. Snowden is playing Devil’s advocate to a degree that basically is unwarranted, puttin his unfair standards of what BJ should or could have done, or been. BJ is one of the few fighters who has stepped up to do above and beyond what he could have. I don’t know any fighter in any weight to traverse the weight class system against such high level competition, and perform so well (regardless of outcome).
Randy is an all time great with his fair share of losses… Chuck Liddell has his fair share… Wanderlei has his fair share…. Matt Hughes has his fair shair… Fighters lose, but that doesn’t change what they’ve done in their careers, or the impact they’ve had on the fight game. BJ is a legend, and has been referred to as such by a jury of his peers, so nothing said on a message board to stir up controversy changes that.
"In this fight, Anderson showed he was human," Nogueira said. "He showed he could be weak. But he showed he is a fighter and he brings something from his heart. It was beautiful."
by Broke Lesnar on Aug 31, 2010 1:04 PM EDT reply actions
or nothing said on a Blog...
"In this fight, Anderson showed he was human," Nogueira said. "He showed he could be weak. But he showed he is a fighter and he brings something from his heart. It was beautiful."
by Broke Lesnar on Aug 31, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions
The 5-5-1 thing is the most disingenuous thing I've seen Snowden right.
Of the 5 losses:
- 2 were to Frankie who appeared to have his number in the second fight. Fair enough. But since the number of people who thought he lost the fight is equal to the number of training partners Frankie has, let’s not get too excited.
- 1 was at welterweight against the greatest athlete in MMA.
- 1 was at welterweight against the most dominant welterweight in history, a man he had already beaten, and he “gassed” after having a rib broken.
- 1 was in his fourth fight ever and since avenged brutally.
So one of those losses was a misjudged win, two were at welterweight against the top 2 welterweights of all time, and 1 was when he was still a baby in octagon terms. Yeah, how overrated can a guy get?
And let’s not forget that one of those 5 wins was at welterweight against the most dominant welterweight in history.
Anyone who takes this line of reasoning seriously is being silly. BJ is one of the greatest fighters of all time. What Snowden – and those who agree with him – is really doing is trying to minimize Frankie’s accomplishments. And that’s a bunch of bullshit.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Aug 31, 2010 1:07 PM EDT reply actions 8 recs
write*
and thanks for showing up to the party finally
I’ve got big walnuts. Gorilla nuts.
by Austin Martin on Aug 31, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh jesus.
See what he does to me?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
That's what drives me crazy
To claim BJ is over rated really bashes Frankie AND totally dismisses how much the Hughes win meant.
"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse
by Chris Barton on Aug 31, 2010 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions
And you know, I don't want to get side-tracked...
…but it’s not hard to argue that BJ beat GSP in their first meeting.
When you consider that he fared better than Rashad Evans did in his fight against Lyoto Machida, any claims that BJ is overrated should be laughed off and ignored.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Aug 31, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 7 recs
There is a valid argument for Penn winning
Penn / Pulver I
Penn / Machida
Penn / GSP I
Penn / Edgar I
All of those fights were far closer than Imada / Curran
I think everyone faired better than Rashad did in fighting Machida.
Your beliefs become your reality.
by Hardy's in your face on Aug 31, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions
How is it disingenuous? That’s What happened.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 1:24 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Oh, so now you're playing naive?
Really?
You’re better than that. You know it, I know it.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Aug 31, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
his record speaks for himself. All the great fighters take on tough guys. The legends and the top tier Hall of Famers are the ones who win. What are you trying to say by mentioning that BJ lost to great fighters. We know that. That’s the point. If he beat great fighters consistently we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
I wonder, looking at your history here, why you are incapable of conversing with anyone in a civilized manner?
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
He also beat great fighters
He destroyed Uno in the first fight, beat Hughes to win the welterweight crown, and beat (an albeit declining) Pulver. Some can argue he beat GSP but that’s another story.
Toronto FC - Where road games are forfeited and we STILL have no idea how to play from behind.
But what has he done lately? Getting beat on by someone who everyone was picking to lose against in a rematch? The majority of the people here were saying Penn would win, I wanted Penn to win. We dont know why he lost, maybe it was his determination or maybe hes just getting older BUT I will tell you in this fight he was a overrated
by Papercut Elbow on Aug 31, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
The overall argument isn't whether BJ is any good.
Snowden is arguing that he was never all that great.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
No I’m not. I’m arguing he is an amazing fighter who didn’t live up to his potential as a pantheon level guy.
Your reading comprehension is horrible.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Goalposts
are a’shifting
"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse
by Chris Barton on Aug 31, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
After all, a 5-5-1 record in title fights was hardly the accomplishment of a legend. I thought it was worth exploring where Penn fit in the big picture. Was he among the elite of all time? One of a handful? Or was he another great warrior who fell just short of immortality?
The questions have been answered. BJ Penn was amazing. But he wasn’t one of the greats. Potential matters. Performance matters more.
BJ Penn, when it is all said and done, will be considered a disappointment. From the time, before his UFC debut, that Frank Shamrock announced the “Prodigy” would be the greatest fighter of all time until this latest loss to Edgar, Penn has little to show for what should have been a legendary career.
I was always writing about Penn’s status as an all-time great. That’s not goalpost shifting. That’s likely you reading the headline only.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Yes it is
you keep changing if it’s just a “great” and “all time great” a “pantheon level guy” or whatever to keep up the argument. Nobody can keep up with what you’re using to define those labels since you keep changing what you’re arguing.
"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse
by Chris Barton on Aug 31, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Not really. Just a problem for the usual suspects.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Usual suspects...
Are you really confusing me with the guys who follow your posts around to bitch?
"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse
by Chris Barton on Aug 31, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Really?
Have you forgotten what you wrote?
“Looking carefully at Penn’s career leads you to one conclusion-despite his inflated reputation, the extraordinary BJ Penn is merely ordinary.”
How can I read that and think that you’re saying that BJ was ever great?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Aug 31, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
(crickets)
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
haha Where is Snowden now?
RUN FORREST! RUN!
by ImmortalTechnique92 on Aug 31, 2010 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I answered this in one of the hundreds of other comments. No repeats for late comers.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Sure. Sure.
By which you mean, after I posted this a second time you admitted that not even you meant that when you wrote it.
Of course, since my point is that you don’t mean any of the things you’ve written about BJ lately…
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
So I guess what you're saying is that you're not better than that?
Huh. I’m happy to be wrong.
Let’s spell it out:
- Merely counting wins and losses as a way to define a career is stupid, unless you want to argue that Jeremy Horn’s 86 wins make him the greatest of all time.
- Ignoring the fact that some of those wins were fighting up a weight class is almost maliciously avoiding the truth.
- Pretending that each of those fights exists solely as a number and not in the context of MMA history is the kind of thing the short-bus commenters around here and I know that you know better.
Or not, I guess.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Aug 31, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Jesus - he's really got me typing like a moron now...
“around here DO”.
Ugh.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
Jeremy Horn also has 19 losses.
Next personal attack from someone is going to end poorly.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Personal attack?
From whom?
I haven’t made any personal attacks on you. I’ve said that I expect better from you and that I think you’re arguments are flawed and disingenuous. That’s not a personal attack.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
“shortbus”
“bullshit”
“naive”
I’m not looking through the whole comment section for more. It’s a pattern with you.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Whoa.
Pulling those words out of context is another good trick. Let’s look closer:
- “shortbus” wasn’t applied to you, but to other commenters – the sort of Long September types that have shown up in the last 6 months. And in saying it, I said that you were better than them.
- “naive” isn’t an insult or an attack, and if it were, it’d be pretty tame. But I didn’t suggest that you were actually naive – I asked if you were playing naive.
- “bullshit” isn’t an indictment of you, but a claim that something was untrue. And I referred specifically to any attempt to undermine Frankie Edgar’s achievements – something you didn’t do directly.
Please go back to insulting my reading comprehension like you did above – incorrectly, I might add – and don’t pretend that I’ve attacked you. I’ve been commenting on this site long enough to know the rules and I’m very careful about what I say. If you don’t like my arguments, you should try addressing just one of them – something you’ve failed to do even once in this thread.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Aug 31, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 9 recs
You haven’t made an argument that someone else hasn’t made better. I can’t respond to everyone of 800 comments.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
But you can insult me?
And accuse me of things I haven’t done?
You’ve got time in your busy schedule to take things I’ve said out of context, but not to actually address my points – points that are all slowly turning green, I might add.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Aug 31, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
What validation that must be for you. A handful of the same people on a site read by tens of thousands a day. That is certainly an accomplishment for you!
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
You do know that this rubs people the wrong way a great deal more than anything you write, don’t you?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions
It is nice.
But go on insulting those people.
That’s a great horse you have. It’s so tall!
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
And let me throw this out as well:
You still avoid actually arguing any of my points in this response, yet manage to be dismissive of me and the rest of the visitors at this site.
(Slow clap.)
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
haha.
"In this fight, Anderson showed he was human," Nogueira said. "He showed he could be weak. But he showed he is a fighter and he brings something from his heart. It was beautiful."
by Broke Lesnar on Aug 31, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
But comment more amirite?
we each must become like fishermen, and go out on to the dark ocean of mind, and let your nets down into that sea
by Barack Lesnar on Aug 31, 2010 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions
You need to tone it down. Whether you are referring to me or someone else here, as the parent of two special needs kids I’m not going to tolerate “short bus” comments.
That’s unacceptable for polite discourse and I’m not going to tolerate it.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions
It sure seems like this has turned into the “Snowden Defense Thread” more than anything about MMA. Which is really sad to me.
And I don’t mean anything about your children Jonathan. While I don’t like your writing style (or opinions) I’d still try and shake your hand if I saw ya.
Nah
Snowden comes across as more of a “squirting flower” kinda guy. Or the gun that snaps your thumb when you take it out of the packages.
I know a guy who put one of the pens
that electrocute you on the sign in book at a funeral. It wasn’t that funny though.
by truck on Aug 31, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
As the parent of one special needs kid...
I’d rather that instead of acting upset you’d address my point.
Which you still don’t want to do. Especially when I pointed out that you said:
"Looking carefully at Penn’s career leads you to one conclusion-despite his inflated reputation, the extraordinary BJ Penn is merely ordinary."
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
That’s one line out of thousands of words I’ve written about BJ Penn. It doesn’t articulately express my viewpoint. You are right.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Nor does your headline in that article.
Nor do a number of things in the second article.
You don’t seem to realize what you’ve written.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
Hey Snowden:
To be perfectly clear, I was actually making a reference to what your boss wrote over at Cageside Seats:
“As our audience grew we attracted more of the special bus kids and Luke doesn’t have much patience. "
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
I think he's suggesting that
using his 5-5-1 record in title fights as a means of arguing that Penn is overrated is disingenuous when you consider the quality and stature of the fighters that defeated him.
"The mat is my church, the ground is my heaven, Jiu-Jitsu is my religion. And once you hit the ground you're in my world..."
The results of these fights just show why the guys who beat him are the GOATs. Them and fighters like them, the ones who achieve. It’s why Penn is close, but not quite in that group.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Is it possible that the Penn who fought Edgar
was not the same guy who had terrorized almost every lightweight he faced previously.
Most people agree that he looked disinterested.
Was his 5 – 3 – 1 in title fights prior to that not impressive?
not to mention
that a good majority of people thought that he won the first Edgar fight, including me.
If you ignore 2010 and work under the assumption that Penn's best years are past him
Which is entirely possible and appeared to be the case in both Edgar fights…
Penn was 5 – 3 – 1 in title fights before the wheels fell off.
That is very respectable considering he won belts in two different weight classes…
On the other hand,
Snowden wants to ignore reality in general.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
You, me, and everyone else that watched it.
(Doug Crosby doesn’t count, as he obviously didn’t watch it.)
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
It was the magic mushrooms.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
Strange the "BJ Overrated" article alongside the "Couture the Right Man for the Job" article
Given that both are essentially even in big fights.
The thing about BJ is that his physical gifts are palpable. You’re never worried about the dude getting knocked out. He has a ton of power. He is absurdly flexible.
It’s no overstatement to say that his only shortcoming is his mental game. He needs a new camp. If he does that, gets motivated, he won’t have been overrated. As with all great athletes, his greatness (or lack thereof) hinges on his ability to recalibrate.
Couture is 9-6 in title fights.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 1:20 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Couture started out 4-0 in title fights
And is since 5-6. Does that make him overrated?
Toronto FC - Where road games are forfeited and we STILL have no idea how to play from behind.
Bravo Leland
Well said. It’s good to see someone who doesn’t depend on tabloid level bullshit to get a response.
Anyone remember when Snowden accused Chuck of doing coke? Enough said.
Welcome to -bloodyelbow.com TMZ.com
by Patrick79x on Aug 31, 2010 1:19 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
What exactly is BJ's "legacy"?
What do you think of when you hear:
Matt Hughes – Slam win over Carlos Newton, his second fight with Trigg, being the most dominant WW ever.
Randy Couture – Out playing Belfort, out wrestling Coleman, Iceman Trilogy…being Randy Couture.
CroCop – “Right leg hospital, left leg morgue”
GSP – Pure athletic greatness. (comedic accent)
Royce Gracie – Pioneer
BJ Penn – ?
Gomi fight I suppose you could put in there. Outside of that…he really hasn’t done much to earn a Legacy.
BJ Penn-Intensity,Awesome Finishes, Ezekiel Bread.
"Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherf**ker" - Jules Winnfield
"A good word that I got from the Mike Tyson Documentary... I'm going to absolutley decimate this motherf**ker, I haven't been in the dictionary to see what it actually means but I'm guessing it's going to be something in the way of just killing a motherf**ker." -Paul Daley (on the definition of Decimate)
by WeaponElDeem on Aug 31, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
lol at this
winning UFC titles in two different weight classes is what now, garbage? i forgot, there’s a ton of fighters who’ve accomplished this feat. strangely though, i can only think of one.
by BeeTrain on Aug 31, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Do you mean the fact I left out Randy winning both LHW and HW belts.
Or the fact I didn’t mention BJs?
I hope you can think of two now.
Wasn’t in the UFC but I’ll take this place to give Dan Henderson props.
Posting in spite of Snowden.
Black Belt in three Years, first non-brazilian to win the worlds
Blazed onto the UFC scene and almost won the title within 4 fights, after destroying the other top contenders.
Beat Matt Hughes
Fought at almost every weight class, and is considered by his peers one of the best ever.
"In this fight, Anderson showed he was human," Nogueira said. "He showed he could be weak. But he showed he is a fighter and he brings something from his heart. It was beautiful."
by Broke Lesnar on Aug 31, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Boom
That shit just happened
by the-gentle-way on Aug 31, 2010 2:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Gomi, Pulver, Uno, Hughes, Sherk and GSP
all lost to this man.
This revisionist bullshit never ends (for both sides) – GSP never lost to BJ, and neither did Edgar (listed elsewhere, by others).
BJ lost to GSP twice and to Edgar twice…either people can’t see reality for the pubes on BJ’s nuts, or they just have no understanding of MMA judging when it varies from the way they imagined a fight transpired…
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 3:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
either people can’t see reality for the pubes on BJ’s nuts, or they just have no understanding of MMA judging
…wouldn’t say that. I scored The first GSP fight 2 rds to 1 for GSP and scored The first Edgar fight 3 rds to 1 Penn with a 10/10 rd to each. I would say I have a firm understanding of the judging decisions and sometimes they fuck up. Penn in my opinion came close but short of beating GSP the first time, but should have retained his title in Edgar/Penn I.
"Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherf**ker" - Jules Winnfield
"A good word that I got from the Mike Tyson Documentary... I'm going to absolutley decimate this motherf**ker, I haven't been in the dictionary to see what it actually means but I'm guessing it's going to be something in the way of just killing a motherf**ker." -Paul Daley (on the definition of Decimate)
by WeaponElDeem on Aug 31, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
A guy who chooses a pic of BJ as their avatar...
Isn’t exactly an impartial observer.
You can’t bitch about Snowden being revisionist and then have shit like homeslice up there saying GSP lost to him.
I think I score fights pretty impartially while still keeping my fan status, not sure what you meant by the second statement…I think GSP won both fights fairly squarely.
"Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherf**ker" - Jules Winnfield
"A good word that I got from the Mike Tyson Documentary... I'm going to absolutley decimate this motherf**ker, I haven't been in the dictionary to see what it actually means but I'm guessing it's going to be something in the way of just killing a motherf**ker." -Paul Daley (on the definition of Decimate)
RNC Matt Hughes, licked blood off of his gloves after demolishing two LW title contenders, destroying Gomi, head kick against Sanchez, nearly taking out Machida, clearly robbed in 1st fight against Edgar, best LW ever.
"The mat is my church, the ground is my heaven, Jiu-Jitsu is my religion. And once you hit the ground you're in my world..."
by Rudinho479 on Aug 31, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The best 155 fighter I've ever seen.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
One of only two men to hold UFC gold in two weight classes
One of only two men to weigh 170 and beat Matt Hughes in the last nine years
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions
…Much better article than previous ones regarding the matter…but was Lyoto really “Lyoto” yet when he fought Penn?
"Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherf**ker" - Jules Winnfield
"A good word that I got from the Mike Tyson Documentary... I'm going to absolutley decimate this motherf**ker, I haven't been in the dictionary to see what it actually means but I'm guessing it's going to be something in the way of just killing a motherf**ker." -Paul Daley (on the definition of Decimate)
Actually, yes.
He was almost the same exact fighter we see today except I think he’s a bit quicker now. Penn basically ate loads of blows to catch Lyoto, and he took a round from him. He even mentions in his book that they studied tape and knew the best course of action was to go at him consistently, and it worked out quite well. Lyoto was just too accurate in his countering, but Penn was the only guy to find success… years ago.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks for the clarification, I’ve seen a few minutes from a dodgy Youtube video…and only really remember how rotund Penn looked.
"Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherf**ker" - Jules Winnfield
"A good word that I got from the Mike Tyson Documentary... I'm going to absolutley decimate this motherf**ker, I haven't been in the dictionary to see what it actually means but I'm guessing it's going to be something in the way of just killing a motherf**ker." -Paul Daley (on the definition of Decimate)
by WeaponElDeem on Aug 31, 2010 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
While I agree with nearly every point in the article, I’m going to ask about this one. Was Penn the “only guy to find success?” He based his attacking style on what Sam Greco did, who dropped a really close decision to Lyoto the fight before. In essence, Sam is the one that showed the path to beating him. Obviously Sam was a tank and BJ doing it at 190 pounds was incredible, but to say that no one figured out Lyoto before BJ seems kind of false. Sam Greco did.
http://www.instrength.com
I think Sam’s approach was basically the only thing he knew how to do, whereas BJ had options. I suppose there could be an argument that at such a high weight class, BJ didn’t have too many options.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 31, 2010 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I just find it amazing that no one else was able to put the approach into practice until basically Shogun.
http://www.instrength.com
Nobody else had the tools to punish Lyoto's stance
and force him to move. Rashad’s headhunting and boxing played perfectly into the karateka’s style. Thiago Silva tried something similar and let Lyoto work angles which set up all the trips. Shogun forced a change in his movement with low kicks to cut off angles and limit him to a straight in-and-out game, which is exactly what got Lyoto tagged and dropped with that right hand.
There’s a solution to the puzzle, but I don’t know how many guys can really put it into practice.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
There is no such thing as a pedestrian 5-5-1 in title fights
No pedestrian fighter gets a title fight let alone wins 5 of them.
It's hard to take an article seriously...
When it says BJ Penn is not a legend, but then in the same breath declares Frank “I Beat Tito Ortiz Once!!!” Shamrock to be a legend based on him doing fuckall in MMA.
I said it in another thread, but Snowden is like listening to your grandpa talk about baseball. Statistics be damned, all the players in his day were greats and these new kids coming up just can’t compare.
Sadly I don’t think Snowden is grandpa aged yet, but he’s grumpy enough to be. Writing a book about MMA’s past seems to have him stuck that only the stuff in his book is relevant to the sport.
by Jason H. on Aug 31, 2010 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
snowden wrote a book?
wow how did i possibly miss that fact? he should totally plug it more
We have a saying back home that if your coming on, COME ON!!!!
by milk72 on Aug 31, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
How?
He was one of the few complete martial artists in the UFC during the UFC’s dark days, had a total of five fights in the UFC and never came back after beating Ortiz. The vast majority of his career was spent in Pancrase, and if Snowden’s own book is to be believed, a hell of a lot of those matches weren’t legitimate contests.
He won the UFC title, spent the next 6 years doing jack shit and came back to fight mid level guys for cash in fights before retiring. I guess the criteria to be a legend goes way down if you started fighting over 10 years ago.
Have you ever seen another fighter who can
not get hurt by punches that TKO him
or
not get hurt by kicks that break his arm
That is more than legendary, that is Chuck Norris legendary.
what people fail to understand is that mma isnt boxing
there are no guys out there with 38-0 bullshit records
fighters in the ufc dont get any bullshit fights, bj has to fight the best constantly and edgar is just that guy whos style can beat his
styles make fights and in mma theres seriously an infinite combination of skills out there and everyone has their weaknesses
We have a saying back home that if your coming on, COME ON!!!!
I am not running to Snowden’s defense, but it should be self evident to any reasonable person that Bj Penn’s legacy is going to be that of a great fighter, one of the best of his era, that never was able to achieve his full potential. Bj Penn thought it was his destiny to become the greatest combat athlete in the world. His father was quoted asking the guys at Sherdog to take him off the moa pfp list, since he was actually the best fighter in the world, in any sport. Bj Penn overrated when compared to his peers? Probably not. Overrated when it comes to potential versus outcomes (especially when you apply Bj’s own personal yardstick for measuring) then yes he is. Like I said, he will be a legend of this era of mma, unfortunately the story his legend will told with the disclaimer that Bj was great but could have been so much more. He could have been the best.
by Noot on Aug 31, 2010 1:50 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
This is obviously true. Pretty much no one who covers the UFC professionally would disagree with what you just wrote. That will be left for a handful of people who like attacking me on the internet and the shrinking group of BJ Penn megafans.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
what truck said
do u actually believe the articles u write or do u just do them to draw up a shitstorm?
We have a saying back home that if your coming on, COME ON!!!!
by milk72 on Aug 31, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I am going to have to re-read Snowden's write
while it might have been heavy handed, but it wasn’t character assassination either.
I think the point id BJ Penn is the Axyl Rose of mma. Both have done great things in their fields, but could have done so much more if they could have stepped out from their own ego..
It wasn't character assassination, but his conclusions were differ from what you wrote
Noot:
it should be self evident to any reasonable person that Bj Penn’s legacy is going to be that of a great fighter
Snowden:
he wasn’t one of the greats.^ That is a direct contradiction.
Noot:
Bj Penn overrated when compared to his peers? Probably not.Snowden:
Is BJ Penn Overrated? Facts Point to Yes^ That is a direct contradiction
I agree with what you said, but I don’t understand how Snowden can when he made points that directly contradict what you said. Despite the fact that Penn was never able to meet his own lofty standards, he was able to meet a standard that impressed most on lookers.
No its not. I don’t think you’ve really read anything I’ve written on this subject. Considering I did you a kindness here not long ago, you are really pushing things over and over again.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I know you're at your boiling point,
but Truck didn’t say anything out of line. And he quoted your article. All he’s doing is discussing the topic.
I have a history with Snowden
I made a couple completely douche out of line comments in another article a few months back. I was banned and after I apologized he was kind enough to lift the banning. I do appreciate that Snowden and I have mostly been a good boy since. That said, I don’t agree with you here and I don’t think I have said anything out of line.
I think DayGeaux is right
Snow has taken a lot of heat the past two days, which he did happen to bring on himself, so he is a bit touchy.
"Don’t quote old fucks to me" – Brent Brookhouse
by Chris Barton on Aug 31, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I read the article and the previous one...
I agree with some points, but I definitely don’t agree with the conclusion. While it is possible I misinterpreted some of what I read I don’t think I did and I believe I have kept the discussion / debate friendly.
Even if I disagree, I like the discussion that your articles generate because discussing and debating MMA is something I enjoy. In general I will gladly listen to and respond to any counterpoints.
How long until this is BE

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Truck's comment was 100% completely innoculous
He wrote two sentences which I defy you to show should have been considered as “pushing things”
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with that but there has to be a better way to support that position than the image you posted. Maybe I’m being overly sensitive but I think it drags the conversation even further down.
Posting in spite of Snowden.
You're probably right
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
While I think Snowden was being a little unfair with his initial portrayal of Penn
I do think Penn is overrated. To me, overrated means that there is a designation of you that everyone continually repeats, but you fail to meet those expectations on a consistent basis. That is Penn.
Snowden does have a point regarding the whole 5-5-1 thing. If you compare Penn to others in championship fights (in no particular order):
Hughes: 9-3
GSP: 7-2
Silva: 8-0
Liddell: 5-2
Couture: 9-6 (Does not include the tournament win)
Ortiz: 6-2 (yeah. I know. But he deserves mentioning here)
Lesnar: 3-0
Penn’s 5-5-1 looks pedestrian against the others. I think what this just shows is what we’ve always known: Penn is inconsistent. Does this mean he isn’t a great fighter? No. I think he is a great fighter. But is he overrated? Yes. For years people have been saying, “If Penn took it seriously…” “If Penn shows up…” “If Penn gets a fire lit under his butt…” That’s a lot of “Ifs” There is no other fighter I can remember where his legacy was, in part, built on what could have been, instead of what is. Like I said, I think Penn is a great fighter. But he’s definitely overrated a little bit. And believe it or not, you can be both.
True greatness? I think you are seeing that in GSP and in Anderson Silva right now. When GSP got KO’d by Serra, he came back stronger. When Silva was being dominated by Sonnen for 4.5 rounds, he submitted him. When Matt Hughes got that illegal blow to the nuts when he fought Trigg and was nearly choked out, he reversed him and slammed Trigg and choked him out instead. When Penn lost to Edgar, he put on a worse performance the second time. When Penn was being slammed by Edgar, he looked lost. Like I said: great fighter, but overrated, and this is in part due to his own delusions of grandeur and his fans building him up to be something he’s not. The syophant behavior of those around him has not helped his career one bit. IF Penn didn’t have so many yes-men, maybe he could have lived up to the rating people gave him. But that’s a big if. :D
by pud333 on Aug 31, 2010 1:54 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
If you went solely off championship fight records,you would have to say Randy’s is just as bad,if not worse than BJ’s.
Some might say Couture is overrated too.
Personally i would say Penn and Couture are rated just about right:
Great but by no means the GOAT.
Plus
Penn’s fights with Gomi,Uno(the first one),Machida and Serra were not championship fights but still top contender bouts or in the Machida case,ridiculous mismatch fights.
He went 3-1 in those.
I agree with you about where they would end up
If you went solely off championship fight records,you would have to say Randy’s is just as bad,if not worse than BJ’s.
Some might say Couture is overrated too.
Personally i would say Penn and Couture are rated just about right:
Great but by no means the GOAT.
but the major difference to me was that in almost all those ‘defining moment’ fights of Couture’s (many of which were title shots) he was expected to lose. Belfort was supposed to take his head off. In the Randleman fight you can actually hear the announcers writing him off. Liddell was supposed to kill him. Tito was too young and athletic. Tim Sylvia was too big and too strong. Hell, a lot of people thought Gonzaga (a huge, strong grappler with mean striking) was going to hurt him badly. However, in each of those fights Randy pulled off amazing upsets no matter how long the odds.
Now compare that with Penn- he was supposed to murder Pulver, destroy Uno again, give GSP the toughest test ever in the second fight, choke Hughes out again, and Edgar was supposed to not even last a round. Whereas Randy defied low expectations, Penn has disappointed the high expectations placed upon him. While I think that they both will be remembered as great fighters, it is these different narratives that make Randy a legendary underdog while Penn leaves fans wondering what might have been.
by Enmascarado on Aug 31, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I liked your definition of overrated. I would add that people can also be overrated becaue they’re effectively given credit for skills they don’t have. For instance, this was the case, until the Sonnen fight, with A. Silva.
And now a tangent:
I have a somewhat odd opinion of Penn. I think that he is generally a hard working and diligent fighter and clearly much harder working than his fans believe. Believing that he’s not a hard worker is actually a compliment, because it implies that he accomplished so much even though he was only functioning at a sliver of his actual potential. Penn himself definitively rebuts this frequently repeated canard in his book. I think you see people continue to believe this because people like transcendant athletes and Penn could potentially be that athlete, at least if you believe he’s significantly underrealizing realizing his “true” potential.
After long thinking he was overrated, I switched gears and came to realize he’s the best LW ever, simply by default. There’s no one else that you can credibly put atop the division. After the losses to Edgar he’s probably not the best LW ever by a wide margin, but he’s still in the lead. I think you have to consider him a legend if for no reason other than the lengthy amount of time he was viewed as, and likely was, the best fighter 155 lbs or under. He came up short in a few fights but generally, at LW at least, he delivered, and he’s been fighting at the highest level of the UFC basically since his second fight in the promotion. He’s without a doubt had the toughest schedule of any fighter ever and his record shows it. I also think, however, that BJ could have been better but he’s more or less realized his potential. If you wanted to say he’s “overrated” for any reason it’s the idea that he has some vast untapped resevoir of fighting ability that was never actualized becuase he was lazy. That’s simply not true.
"If a dick don't get hard offa cocaine, what would you axe it?" O.D.B.
"To be is to be the value of a bound variable." W.V.O Quine
"I shoot. I score. He shoots. I score." Dan Gable.
by The Darkness on Aug 31, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
After long thinking he was overrated, I switched gears and came to realize he’s the best LW ever, simply by default. There’s no one else that you can credibly put atop the division.
This is interesting. You’re right that it’s almost by default he gets that title. I think Edgar has to have a couple more title defenses to really take the best LW ever title, but he is, currently, the best LW right now. If that makes any sense.
Edgar would have to do a bit more than that...
BJ, like Fedor, is currently the greatest ever in his weight class, just no longer the greatest…
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 4:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Man, I've defended Snowden against the "Troll" label a bunch of times...
…but I think I’m going to have to give up and leave that to him. If he doesn’t want to be seen that way, he’s going to have to try harder not to write such indefensible things.
And as much as it pains me to agree with Leland: the guy is right. Thank goodness this argument boils down to:
JS: Black is white!
LR: Ummm… no? What?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
I don't think it is overrated. It's more under motivated.
I’m one of few who is actually indifferent towards BJ. I rarely get excited for his fights because indoor know who is going to show up. This past Saturday crystallized that sentiment for me. I waited for the 5th round and thought he would come out with some real, determined urgency. As the seconds ticked away it never happened. He was clearly losing and ue did nothing to turn that tide. Look at Anderson against Chael. Clearly beaten thru four rounds and then in the 5th he executed his gameplan perfectly. I did not see that at all from BJ. I had a project in Hawaii that was about a year long. We always joked about deadlines being on real time or Hawaiian time. With BJ it’s the same thing. Is his greatness going to show up in a fight in real time or BJ time?
by memitim on Aug 31, 2010 2:23 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Shortly before Snowden started writing here....
he argued with me in the comments of a story that we shouldn’t look at Penn’s beatdown of Gomi as an accomplishment, when evaluating Penn’s standing as one of the greats, because Gomi was never very good. This pretty much tells you where he stands on BJ Penn (and Gomi, I suppose).
I like some of the things he writes but nobody here is going to make him believe that Penn has accomplished anything great.
Man, here's where I'm confused.
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/7/13/1567110/the-kingpin-the-best-fighters-in#storyjump
Honorable mention, BJ Penn for ’03-04 under Wanderlei and Fedor.
I feel like BJ got props for what he did when he did it. This is just a big picture look at his startling struggles and failures balancing out his spectacular performances.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
I recognize how great BJ could have been. That’s what makes it frustrating that he can’t figure it out.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
i still don't u/s the logic
that you “recognize how great BJ COULD have been!” you’ve written him off already? that’s not fair
Don’t you think it’s unfair to judge a fighter’s potential and then castigate him for not living up to it? Maybe people are what they do, not what they’re capable of. What BJ Penn has done in MMA makes him an all time great.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m sure the argument is “he should have stayed at lightweight”, but the fact that he beat Matt Hughes at welterweight in between his domination(s?) of the 155 division does it for me.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Don’t let the facts get in the way Derek. His first “domination” ended with two failures to win the title. Domination?
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions
How many people not named Randy Couture have ever held a UFC belt in two different weight classes?
How many people not named Georges St Pierre have defeated Matt Hughes in a fight, while making weight at 170, over the last nine years?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions
That is disingenous. How many great MMA fighters jumped weight classes in their prime. Of course there aren’t many – it’s because guys on par with BJ Penn talent wise were too busy winning and dominating their weight classes.
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions
So you're going to discredit his accomplishment
Because he ate himself out of lightweight?
Toronto FC - Where road games are forfeited and we STILL have no idea how to play from behind.
How easy is that to spin?
The answer to both questions, by the way, is one, and it’s the same guy.
“Too busy winning and dominating their weight classes” can easily become “too busy coasting and padding their records” with a little finesse. Honestly, the fact that BJ left lightweight and ever became champion there again – let alone doing so brutally, then destroying Sherk, then getting hit 8 times in 24 minutes against Sanchez – is absolutely astounding.
I better not hear anyone demeaning BJ’s record during his welterweight days take a shit on Anderson Silva fighting Cote/Leites/Maia, is all I’m saying.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions
BJ Penn told me that BJ Penn was a disappointment for much of his career. Why are you spinning so furiously when the man himself is very open that he disappointed too often in his first Zuffa run and early in his return?
by Jonathan Snowden on Aug 31, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions
I believe he considers himself the best lightweight on Earth and an all time great. Will Jonathan Snowden tell BJ Penn that he’s wrong?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Besides
He either says “I disappointed” or “GSP is a better fighter than I am” – which seems more likely?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Contributor for WatchKalibRun.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Aug 31, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions
He just got beat twice
and in this last fight it wasn’t even close. How can he be considered the greatest LW on earth? I think he is number 3 right now.
by memitim on Aug 31, 2010 5:53 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
C'mon now, you're the historian
You’re going to bitch that the guy wasn’t fighting at LW when UFC had no LW division to speak of? You of all people should remember that before the TUF era, UFC wasn’t running enough shows to support LW so they got rid of the title and pretty much the entire division.
You’re griping that he jumped divisions when UFC had no LW division? What exactly should he have done?
"BJ got props for what he did when he did it"
That’s kinda my point is that beating down Gomi like he did was a HUGE thing at the time but Snowden went into detail about why Gomi was overrated, never beat anybody, etc. That’s taking away one of Penn’s bigger accomplishments. I think he has his opinion and that he’s entitled to it. I just think he’s wrong. Circle of life.
He looks like that is the last place in the world he wants to be.
And he fought that way too. His career is far from over but he has a lot of work to do to secure an “all time great” career.
by memitim on Aug 31, 2010 4:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Except
that Fedor, even in his loss to Werdum, was looking to destroy the man in front of him once the fight began in earnest. Penn seemed lethargic throughout.
"The mat is my church, the ground is my heaven, Jiu-Jitsu is my religion. And once you hit the ground you're in my world..."
The reality is...
When you’ve been proclaimed as the “greatest P4P fighter in the world”, the “greatest lightweight of all time” and someone who many fans believed could walk into any neighboring division and win, but in reality you’re actually 5-5-1 in title fights? Yes. You are overrated. That’s just a fact of the bias, hype, and significance the internet community has heaped onto BJ from day one.
It’s just like Vitor Belfort and people wanting him to have a title shot despite never earning it. Some fighters have an inherent bias in their favor. Anytime they look good, fans freak out, and anytime they lose, fans find excuses for them.
If you want to say BJ’s simply a good/great fighter? I buy that. But even after GSP’s manhandling of Penn, I still saw fans proclaiming BJ as a super elite top three or even number one P4P fighter. He just isn’t. He never earned that status. He was given it based upon being BJ Penn.
If you want to say BJ’s simply a good/great fighter? I buy that. But even after GSP’s manhandling of Penn, I still saw fans proclaiming BJ as a super elite top three or even number one P4P fighter. He just isn’t. He never earned that status. He was given it based upon being BJ Penn.
Agreed. I just never understood the whole P4P best comments. 5-5-1 in title fights doesn’t mean you’re P4P best. Not even close.
I think the people that ranked him in the top 3 p4p were looking at his skill sets
Possibly the best BJJ in MMA
Possibly the best wrestling in MMA
Amazing TDD and wrestling of his own
Not to mention that he was ranked as the #1 fighter in two different weight classes at one point. What was so objectionable about p4p consideration? I didn’t have him in the top 3 recently, but I am not shocked some did.
He has never had great wrestling, although he did have elite grappling with superb TDD.
He also had (and has) an iron chin.
Unfortunately, his once world-class BJJ and TDD seem to be nowhere near where they once were.
Perhaps GSP truly broke him in their last fight…
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -Arthur Schopenhauer
Haters are gonna hate and bitches are gonna bitch...
by BigDNotDallas on Aug 31, 2010 4:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
When you’ve been proclaimed as the "greatest P4P fighter in the world", the "greatest lightweight of all time" and someone who many fans believed could walk into any neighboring division and win, but in reality you’re actually 5-5-1 in title fights? Yes. You are overrated.
In reality that was a very small group of very vocal fans. I remember a couple people arguing that BJ could defeat Anderson Silva. That person was overrating Penn, that doesn’t make Penn overrated. I think the consensus is something closer to:
the "greatest P4P fighter in the world", the "greatest lightweight of all time" and someone who many fans believed could walk into any neighboring division and win I think that is at least reasonable.
You could find similar groups of people making the argument (4 or 5 years ago) that Kobe was better than Jordan
…or in MMA…
People have been calling Fedor overrated for years.
Just because a few idiots shout really loud, that doesn’t make it the consensus.
While I like this piece much better
Snowden’s comments on this past MMANation helped me to understand his post better
by X5-452 on Aug 31, 2010 7:07 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
“What exactly does overrated mean? It means we’ve rated him too highly, and for many fans — that’s definitely the case.”
That’s my take. People read too much into the word “overrated” and take it to mean the person in question is total garbage. BJ Penn is not the invincible overlord of the Lightweight division, which is more or less where his stock was. He is an elite lightweight with an extremely impressive history in the sport with strengths and weaknesses, some of which Edgar was able to take ample advantage of. Thus in my eyes he was overrated.
by Symbul on Aug 31, 2010 8:52 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Articles like Mr. Snowden’s and the vast majority of comments that they seem to produce generally make me stop visiting the site for a few days.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito Ortiz on Vitor Belfort at Affliction:DOR
I’m suprised that the generalization is that Penn is overrated. I’m of the belief that he was never overrated, but rather has reached his point of maximum growth and is now in regression. Like so many that preceeded him,
BJ has reached the point where the sport is beginning to evolve past him. He’s obviously still at the very top, but unless he changes some things up, he’ll continue to be exposed in different areas by constantly improving younger talent.
I for one believe that Penn surrounds himself with ‘yes men’. If he had a solid camp around him the questions surrounding his training and motivation would immediately disappear. His lack of a gameplan in the second Edgar fight shows that he’s just not getting what he needs from his current camp.
In the end it’s styles that make fights and perhaps Edgar just has that special recipe to defeat Penn, but I see this a definite turning point in the LW division. It doesn’t mean that BJ’s legacy is tarnished, it just signals that he’s no longer the top dog.

by 

















