The Evolution of MMA Relies on the American Wrestler
Over the past week or two, many major MMA media sites and blogs have been running opinion pieces in parallel with Michael Schiavello's piece at Heavy.com talking about the potential for American wrestling stifling the growth of mixed martial arts. Schiavello's opinion ultimately dwindles down to the point that the mixed martial artists must continue to evolve and learn:
Fighters like Anderson Silva, Georges St Pierre, Gegard Mousasi, Fedor Emelianenko and Lyoto Machida continue to put the martial arts into Mixed Martial Arts and showcase the type of amazing, all-round, multi-skilled and high-level athlete this sport can produce. And more than ever before, it is the likes of Silva, Fedor, Mousasi, and St Pierre who must not rest on their laurels (as perhaps Mousasi did in preparing for King Mo) and need to keep working hard to maintain that edge, knowing that America’s superb and powerful wrestlers are the next wave to hit MMA (just as Brazilian Jiu Jitsu was the first wave) and they can either learn how to surf that wave to victory or be drowned beneath its force.
I completely agree with Schiavello's stance here, and it saddens me that a lot of MMA media is quick to point that the piece is basically saying Schiavello is anti-wrestling. I'd take the opposite view and state that Schiavello is pro-mixed martial arts.
There are plenty of fighters near the top of each weight class who don't call "wrestling" their primary offensive weapon to victory. B.J. Penn, Fedor Emelianenko, Anderson Silva, and Jose Aldo come to mind, but there are the wrestlers of the style mentioned in the piece like Jon Fitch, Josh Koscheck, Georges St. Pierre, Brock Lesnar, and countless others who do encompass all the attributes of a wrestler who will completely neutralize and punish their opponents from the top.
The answer has either been to outwrestle these types of fighters and implement your own top control game, or in the case of fighters like Mauricio "Shogun" Rua, Lyoto Machida, Fedor Emelianenko, or Anderson Silva -- be absolutely head and shoulders above those fighters in most areas of your skill-set while also possesses some skills to counter a wrestler.
While some of these fighters have yet to battle a positionally dominant wrestler, some in this group have evolved their repertoire for skills to counter these smothering competitors. Fedor's transition skills in combination with his submission ability took out Olympians like Matt Lindland and Mark Coleman while Anderson Silva's intimidating striking and underrated ground skills choked out Dan Henderson. Brazilian jiu-jitsu black belt Bibiano Fernandes was able to submit an Olympic gold-medal favorite in Joe Warren in Japan.
Sure, we could argue that many of these names never evolved or learned the other areas they needed to learn in order to be successful, but that's exactly the point I'm making. These other martial arts such as Judo, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, and Karate have caused many of these wrestlers to explore those areas in order to defend techniques against their own skill-set, but are the complete mixed martial artists evolving to account for their deficiency in wrestling?
I think the dominating top control style of American wrestlers is actually helping many of the athletes in this sport evolve considerably. Sure, wrestlers have an advantage in that they can move toward the top of their weight class using primarily a wrestling skill-set with some knowledge of how to strike from the top and basic submissions, but they do need to learn the art of Brazilian jiu-jitsu in order to avoid submissions. Eventually, they'll run into a complete fighter who has the strength and knowledge to stuff takedowns, and their failure will be imminent when said opponent happens to know how to strike effectively.
It's a fighter's job to evolve and add skills to their arsenal to neutralize those types of gameplans, and if they can't stop a NCAA Division I champion from pounding the life out of them -- They've got some work to do.
Some would say that this stance really isn't the issue, that the real issue is that these ground n' pound specialists create boredom in the fight game. The real dilemma is that straight wrestlers must evolve because there is an appeal factor that upper-tier promotions require from their fighters. Simply take a look at Yushin Okami's career path and style in the past. Luckily, he put on a dizzying display of boxing in his last fight, and now Dana White seems to be singing praises about him.
There is a two-front resistance when we talk about wrestling in MMA. They can win dominantly in boring fashion and progress their careers, but there is a level of career progression that they hit before being a dominating wrestler just doesn't cut it. Beating top competition in stale fashion from top control works, but evolving offers more benefits such as pay-per-view time, bonuses, more pay, and the chance to become a fan-favorite star.
Some fighters will tell you that they simply don't care and want to win, and as much as I love Antonio McKee -- the guy falls into a category of fighter that will never progress a Strikeforce or UFC level. He's rather old, but if he were say... 25 years old and as dominant as he is from top control, he'd still be slugging it out in the minors. For this reason alone, wrestlers will evolve, at least at the upper levels.
Just like Brazilian jiu-jitsu., wrestling will help evolve the sport. Fighters had to suddenly learn the art of BJJ in order to compete in mixed martial arts instead of being bar-room brawlers, and now we're at a new level. Not only has the sport evolved into what it is today, but now we're seeing the skills of wrestling evolve it even further.
117 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
GSP one of the greatest "American wrestlers" ????????
Him that is so cool! When did he get his American citizenship?
I'm from Canada, and they think I'm slow eh!
by Simboy on May 21, 2010 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
What continent do you think Canada is part of?
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on May 21, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Curiously, Europe encompasses over 40 countries, what country owns Europe?
by ManicPreacher on May 21, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
We have China by the balls waaaaay worse than they have us
And that will be more evident soon with the looming Chinese economic slowdown.
Not afraid to nitpick
Canadians differentiate themselves from us by calling us Americans, even if we are all in North America. It’s like Poutine, you wouldn’t know about it unless you are Canada or live near the border.
That doesn't make any sense... Do people from the US refer to Mexicans as Americans?
It was people from the US that coined the phrase and who use it the most. Sure there are the North and South Americas, but what does Canada have to do with anything?
We didn’t create the American National Anthem, the American Broadcast Corporation or american Gladiators and we didn’t decide that people from the United States of America would be called Americans. That term had already been around for around 90 years when Canada officially became a country…
by truck on May 21, 2010 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Oh dude
for your own sake it’s to bad you can’t delete this.
ALL OF YOU LISTEN TO MEE, DON'T DISTURB HERE, I WILL CALL POLICE CATCH YOU, DON'T COME TO MY BANGOLOW HOUSE, UNDERSTAND, O.K. I HATE ALL OF YOU.
by Chris Barton on May 21, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Why delete my post?
The article states the ‘American Wrestler’ not the art of American wrestling, or American wrestling practitioners.
That is like saying, “Japanese Judoka” are sweeping the UFC, which include such fighters as Karo Parisyan etc…………
I’m just pointing out that American wrestling is taking over, not just Americans who practice American wrestling.
Also, what continent is Canada….it’s North American, but when someone from Canada is Canadian someone from the United States of America is American….therefore ‘the American Wrestler’ by default is referring to a citizen of The United States of America….that is all.
I'm from Canada, and they think I'm slow eh!
I Love MMA
it’s so young. cross-training along with specific backgrounds while growing up is just starting to become a widespread trend.
Even just 6 years ago when I was in HS wrestling, it was all about wrestling year round. Now my old coach is actually setting guys up to do jiu-jitsu and boxing training in the offseasons.
this shit is gonna be awesome. i actually think the days of the Olympic/NCAA champ wrestler making his way to the top are soon to be over. The wrestler-backgrounds who will make it to the top in coming years will be the guys who are pretty damn good high school wrestlers, but didn’t spent endless hours trying to make the Olympics, instead cross-trained in offseason from the age of 14-15. Guys who will have enough wrestling that the Olympic/NCAA guys will have to think twice about wrestling with them, yet also have some years of training other ways to finish that will make the big-time wrestlers think twice.
Wrestlers
Wrestlers just come in two breeds. Those that look for finishes and actually MAKE the effort to punish those on top, and those that, “lay n pray.” I think that people don’t understand the idea that a wrestler’s main attack is to take em down, and cause, “Death From Above” (see: Brock Lesnar v Mir II). Wrestlers like Fitch and Kos though are what gives them a bad name. Yes Kos makes minimal effort to finish, but when was the last time Fitch actually finished a fight?
Also I apologize if this does suck, I had just woken up from a night of alcoholic shenanigans.
To be perfectly honest, a whole lot of people discounted Daley’s improvements. The guy never used to hip escape like that, and he’s powerful.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 21, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i dunno if you can classify kos as a lnp type dude, fitch for sure. kos is always looking for a choke/pounding/improving position and his takedowns tend to not be as boring as say someone like fitch or gsp, they tend to be explosive, taking the other guy down with authority and then as they get up, picking them up and slamming them down again.
to me, fitch/shields/gsp takedowns appear very gentle in comparison.
by kanodogg on May 21, 2010 11:33 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Kos has evolved.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 21, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn't put GSP..
..in the “gentle takedowns” category. He’s done more than his fair share of powerful double legs and slams (vs. Sherk, Penn, Alves, Koscheck, Miller, etc).
A program. And rifles.
LOL, you must not have seen any GSP fights if that’s your observation. That guy is the definition of explosive.
by Hardcharger on May 21, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I put this in another post last week. look at all the “elite” wrestlers coming into MMA:
Ben Askren (4-0 all wins by stoppages)
Phil Davis (6-0, 4 wins by stoppage)
Jake Rosholt (7-2 all wins by stoppages)
Johny Hendricks (8-0, 5 wins by stoppage)
Shane Roller (8-2 all wins by stoppage)
Mo Lawal (7-0, 5 wins by stoppage)
Shane Carwin (12-0, all wins by stoppage)
Yes, they may use their wrestling to their advantage, but they also use it to get themselves into the position to finish fights.
I think the days of Elite wrestlers coming out of college and just becoming a L’n’P fighter is on the way out the door. Guys like Antonio McKee are few and far between. Even so called “Boring” fighters like Maynard and Fitch tend to try to finish fights (although somewhat unsuccessfully)
It's important to note
All those guys with the exception of Carwin have been competing at the lower levels making it much easier to finish their opponents.
Google Ron Paul!
I think that one side of this debate that is overlooked
is that mma is the representation of which particular “martial” style would dominate in true combat. think of the moves in mma that are banned. spikes and knees to the head on the ground are two moves that come to mind that would benefit good wrestlers greater than it would any other skillset. in real life these moves aren’t illegal- so if good wrestlers are the top tier of competition, this alludes to the fact that in a street fight, or a no holds barred match, a wrestler with the ability to knee to the head on the ground would have the greatest chance at victory.
Even when I'm laying on my back I'm never backing down
by Austin Martin on May 21, 2010 11:22 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Knees to the head is interesting because it hurts wrestlers, but also gives them more weapons.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 21, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
i’m just imagining a dominant top control guy like bones, hughes, gsp, or BROCKLESNAR… imagine how many fights they could end with knees to the head
how do you think it hurts them?
Even when I'm laying on my back I'm never backing down
by Austin Martin on May 21, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Ouch
I seriously have a headache thinking of that. Brock Lesnar in PRIDE would have been death in human form.
can you imagine a juiced up brock in pride with knees to the head allowed?
by kanodogg on May 21, 2010 11:35 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
did you see that episode of sport science where rashad kneed a dummy and he put a hole in the skull? i think it would look like that
Even when I'm laying on my back I'm never backing down
by Austin Martin on May 21, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
That wasn’t Sport Science, but Deadliest Warrior – he was modeling for Alexander the Great’s pankration skills.
If you're not watching Treme, you're a bad person.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on May 21, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions
It hurts them because guys who can overpower them on the ground from top control can finally knee to the head as well, and it eliminates the whole mentality of wrestlers putting their knees down as they try to grab takedowns. They would be able to be kneed in those positions as well.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 21, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
hadn’t thought about that aspect at all. like when they’re rocked, grabbing for a single leg. i think you could apply that to all fighters though. i was speaking more of a dominant, in his prime wrestler who is already running through opponents. Jake Shields with knees would go from Linus’s wet blanket to the next best thing
Even when I'm laying on my back I'm never backing down
by Austin Martin on May 21, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It just gives guys who have trouble an extra weapon. It certainly wouldn’t stop wrestlers outright at all.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 21, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
If a fighter doesn't complete a double leg,
they are sitting in a perfect spot to get kneed in the head
In Pride
wrestlers thought twice before going for a lazy double leg. Guys like Chuck with a decent sprawl would make dudes pay for sloppy TD tries.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on May 21, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Said weapons

Walking the line between intelligence and ignorance since 1985
@deowade
by Damon O. on May 21, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
my point exactly. would coleman have been the fighter he was without knees to the head on the ground? nope. he dominated guys, and won a lot of fights with those.
Even when I'm laying on my back I'm never backing down
by Austin Martin on May 21, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nah, Coleman needs headbutts.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 21, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
The important thing was that it allowed him to use his wrestling to FINISH instead of just leg hump. I’m in favor of anything that allows the fight to end one way or another.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 21, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
knees like that from north-south to the top of the head should actually not be allowed. of all the knees, kicks, and stomps on the ground, those are by far the most dangerous. they can heavily compress the spine and even cause skull fractures because the top of your dome is where its weakest.
they had Rashad Evans on Deadliest Warrior a few weeks ago, and had him demonstrate a north-south kneed like that on a ballistics analog and he was able to break the neck and the skull
Since when has Deadliest Warrior been a reliable source for scientific data?
by philibuster968 on May 21, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Hahah, this. I remember the Shaka Zulu/William Wallace encounter, where they had Wallace winning going away. The only problem is he was carrying forty pounds of armament. You ever try doing that on the African savannah in ninety degree heat? Shaka could just jog away and Wallace would die in an hour.
still a guilty fun show, especially when they test things like flamethrowers
by Tim the Enchanter on May 21, 2010 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Almost forgot about this one

Walking the line between intelligence and ignorance since 1985
@deowade
when knees are allowed on the ground, getting your gaurd passed is really dangerous
knees from the North South position are deadly
which particular "martial" style would dominate in true combat. think of the moves in mma that are banned
And the flip-side of that coin is that I’m sure every “TMA” has moves that are banned that would be equally destructive without a ruleset.
In my school we drill neck/throat, eye, ear, nose attacks. If a wrestler wants to put his head in my chest for a takedown, he may well get it, but I’m going home with a bodypart.
Not to say that in a rule-less “true combat” the wrestler wouldn’t have the same options, they certainly would. I’’m just sayng that this line of talk is a serious Can-O-Worms™
by hardlyworking on May 21, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions
They should allow biting in the ring a nice chomp on your nuts is a great escape from a triangle choke. My girlfriend taught me that the hard way.
by sloppyknoll on May 21, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
What do you guys think about Dana's 2020 plan for biggest sport in the world?
MMA Aggregator - http://mma.ly
no.
and not until a way is figured out that kids can safely start MMA at like age 5 or 6 (or even earlier), like in soccer and basketball.
Even though Jon Fitch makes me want to pull my hair out
…I agree with this article. There are still too many elite fighters from BJJ and striking backgrounds to make the case that dominant positional wrestlers are overtaking/harming MMA. Moreover, as you point out, there are a ton of guys with wrestling background who incorporate those skills into a highly effective and entertaining MMA style (Jon Jones leaps to mind).
One can only hope that those type of fighters will rise, while guys like Fitch, Sonnen and Maynard remain mired in the contender-not-champion limbo.
On the other hand, if I wake up one day and those three guys are the WW, MW and LW champions, I’m gonna be calling for some rule changes, along with every other fan who never wore wrestling headgear.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on May 21, 2010 11:33 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
What rule changes would you add to the sport if these guys ended up being the champs?
by Darren Watkins on May 21, 2010 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m actually not sure. I’ve said in a few other forums that I think the Pride ruleset and structure was more balanced, but that’s purely anecdotal.
Posters here have suggested some interesting scoring changes to discourage stalling and devalue meaningless take downs.
Like I said, I don’t think it’s needed now, but I could foresee a world in which it would be.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on May 21, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I still say the scoring is the problem.
If you could give 10-9 or 10-10 for a round where a guy LnP and then 10-8 for one where there was more asskicking going on the wrestling wouldn’t be such an issue. Also, takedowns that don’t accomplish anything shouldn’t count for any points.
There’s a reason why wrestling matches aren’t scored with 10-9 rounds like boxing matches.
No one minds when people use wrestling to finish a fight, they mind when it’s used to grind out a decision with no intention of finishing.
i agree, i think that mma should move to a point system and whoever gets the most overall points wins. a different amnt of points for strikes, takedowns, passes, sub attempts and such would be move like wrestling, but you could award a 10-9 round or less depending on the number of points
Even when I'm laying on my back I'm never backing down
by Austin Martin on May 21, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Then guys would fight just to rack up points and not really try to finish the fight. Once you starting adding value to what is good and what is not good in MMA you do not reward people with innovation.
by Darren Watkins on May 21, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
agreed. even in HS wrestling , everbody hated the dudes who relied on a takedown-release-to-the-feet to win, without ever really working for pins, like they were afraid of getting reversed on the gound. take 2 points, give 1, over and over. this is a tactic that everyone uses every now and then when it was most prudent, but some guys just did it all the time, and we hated those fuckers
Funny, since that is the style of many Div 1 wrestlers.
by Hardcharger on May 21, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
it would stop a guy from laying in guard and doing just enough damage to steal a round. if you give a guy points for the initial takedown, and then only for passes and such, it would stop awarding victories like couture over vera, or apparently the beerbohm win i haven’t watched yet
Even when I'm laying on my back I'm never backing down
by Austin Martin on May 21, 2010 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Why no Russian wrestlers?
Why don’t we see more Russian wrestlers in MMA? It’s my understanding that Russia and other former Soviet nations dominate in international wrestling competition. But all the MMA fighters who come out of Russia come from a Sambo background and have a very judo-like approach to take downs. Fedor’s the archetype of this tendency.
I mean – there’s basically a whole slew of Russians who’ve competed at the Lawal/Cormier level of competition. Why don’t we see them – or at least their techniques – in MMA?
Anyone who’s familiar with Russian scholastic athletics and/or MMA want to hazard a guess?
A program. And rifles.
i don’t know about Russian scholastic athletics, but I do know that Russia and the like are all about Greco, which is where they dominate. and with Greco, leg takedowns are not allowed, it’s all about the clinch and using positioning to either throw or cause your opponent to fall over his center of balance. Clinchwork opens you up to knees and elbows, making Greco translate to MMA less than folk/freestyle. Even the accomplished american Greco guys like Hendo, Sonnen, and Joe Warren actually primarily use the folkstyle wrestling they developed in HS and College before hitting the world greco scene.
Americans still own folk and freestyle
List of FILA freestyle wrestling individual and team champions by year:
Now I’m not about to pretend I know anything about international freestyle wrestling competition, but I think FILA is widely recognized as the top international sanctioning body in the sport. Am I wrong?
I think you’re right as far as folk/catch wrestling goes. And I’m really excited to see more catch wrestling come back to the sport. It seems like more MMA fighters are beginning to train in it nowadays.
A program. And rifles.
well, holy shit. i was looking for that but couldn’t find it, so i just went with my biased gut. i stand corrected. Then where are all the russian freestyle fuckers in MMA. can u make more money wrestling in Russia?
Me too
I was pretty flabbergasted when I found that a few days ago, because my impression, like yours, was that the US was pretty competitive in freestyle wrestling internationally.
But I know so very little about wrestling (really) that I wasn’t sure if FILA was a truly international sanctioning body or if it was Russian-centric. It looks like it is, but I’m still not sure.
A program. And rifles.
Americans still own folk and freestyle
Nope. Russia won 6 medals in Beijing, USA only one. Russia owns both Freestyle and Greco.
In the last 8 years Russia won 26 golden medals at World Championships, America 3.
"...ride life straight to perfect laughter,
it's the only good fight there is."
by dancingChicken on May 21, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions
America=USA
"...ride life straight to perfect laughter,
it's the only good fight there is."
by dancingChicken on May 21, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Russinas do Business so differently
B.c Russians are crazy? I really have no clue why we dont see more Russians in MMA. As we can see from Fedor they have a different way of doing business than Americans.
by Darren Watkins on May 21, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions
My only guess would be that it pays off to be a wrestler in Russia. I mean, MMA is not popular in Russia, but Fedor is able to drink a cup tee with Putin, so I guess that they take care of their athletes.
"...ride life straight to perfect laughter,
it's the only good fight there is."
by dancingChicken on May 21, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
*cup of tee
"...ride life straight to perfect laughter,
it's the only good fight there is."
by dancingChicken on May 21, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
*cup of tea?
ALL OF YOU LISTEN TO MEE, DON'T DISTURB HERE, I WILL CALL POLICE CATCH YOU, DON'T COME TO MY BANGOLOW HOUSE, UNDERSTAND, O.K. I HATE ALL OF YOU.
by Chris Barton on May 21, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, sorry for that. I guess it’s time to go bed.
"...ride life straight to perfect laughter,
it's the only good fight there is."
by dancingChicken on May 21, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Not even close
America only owns in folkstyle and are the only country that really uses that style of wrestling. We are ok at Freestyle and normally behind in Greco but have had some success in recent year internationally. Russia and the USSR have dominated wrestling for many years. On top of that places in the middle east are very good in freestyle and greco. Iran’ national sport is wrestling. They fill big venues up for a wrestling match.
It will be interesting as MMA grows to see if other countries wrestlers moved to MMA. If you want to see FILA results you can go here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FILA_Wrestling_World_Championships
by Darren Watkins on May 21, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions
The same reason that internationally prominent Russian athletes (the Klitschkos, female tennis stars, hockey players) no longer live in Russia. Fedor’s the only one, and he can only do it because Vadim pays off the right people. I’ve been there and helped naturalize a lot of Russians, and the culture there is so different that it defies belief to an American. Over there, if you have ANY signs of wealth, you are a target and require protection. It doesn’t matter how famous you are. Someone is gunning for you. Look at Dmitri Berbatov, who had to flee Bulgaria under kidnapping threats to go play for Manchester United and hasn’t been back since, or Evgeni Malkin, who had to go into hiding in Finland to get away from the Russian hockey team that owned his rights to go play for the Pittsburgh Penguins and win a Stanley Cup. He can’t go back because a contract violation, which would normally be a civil matter with a fine, has been inflated into several criminal charges by the government, acting at the behest of the owners. There’s also a hit out on him, and he had to extract his family from the country at great cost.
That’s why Fedor doesn’t leave M-1. It’s not that he’s ducking anyone. He can’t live in Russia without their protection, and he doesn’t know how to live anywhere else. And it’s why more Russian athletes don’t try to take the jump. They have to play by the rules over there and work for the right people, and with no pipeline from Russia or Eastern Europe to a big-money US promotion, no one is willing to protect them over here in the same way they are for tennis playing teenage girls.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 21, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions 11 recs
Interesting
and informative response. Thanks!
Still got a couple of questions:
1) You still don’t see wrestlers from any other former Soviet countries where freestyle wrestling is big coming to MMA. Is it the same deal in those countries?
2) It seems like you’d see low- to mid-level Russian wrestlers competing in MMA. Like you see a sprinkling of Russian Sambo and kickboxing fighters in MMA. MMA doesn’t exactly pay the big bucks for the vast majority of athletes, and the examples you mention are hockey and soccer stars that make quite a bit of money.
I have no doubt that the crime-related stuff you mention plays a large role in it, but I don’t think its the only reason that you don’t see Russian wrestlers in MMA. Like I said, you see a sprinkling of Russian fighters from other disciplines, but none from wrestling AFAIK.
A program. And rifles.
Hi, bud. Thanks for the props.
1.) A lot of former Soviet republics have the same issues with crime and cultural rejection of money. The MMA scene in Eastern Europe is nascent at best, and there may be a number of guys over there we don’t know about, but boxing and kickboxing are still the big combat sports. I’m sure there are guys who WOULD be good at MMA, but of the global promotions, only M-1 stages any events with any gravitas. If a guy in Latvia wipes the floor with everyone at that little show, where does he go?
2.) Those guys do fight. If you saw the M-1 challenge series, it was all Russian, Ukranian etc. fighters with sambo and grappling backgrounds. Again, how do you get them on the big stage? If you go across Russia, there are a number of shows, but since they aren’t in the UFC, no one here knows about them or has any idea about the level of competition that they’ve faced.
The final issue is one I really didn’t go into, but I talked to some of my friends these last couple of hours and they brought up a good point. As was mentioned earlier, the Russians dominate at wrestling. If you’re a top former wrestler, with the government-sponsored sports industry what it is over there, it’s a much safer career to take a job training other Olympians on the public dole for a steady income than it is to try to learn new disciplines in a strange sport. MMA is still very underground in Russia. Either you work very hard for uncertain results or you sell your soul to a group like M-1. So unlike over here, where Title 9 and a lack of national respect killed employment opportunities for wrestlers, the ones over there have some options and the community takes pride in their achievements. Consequently, American wrestling is experiencing a renaissance based on greater awareness of MMA (don’t believe me? Ask any wrestling coach why people are signing up), whereas in Russia it is seen as a strange, bastardized, unregulated rival that only the failures of a revered sport would embrace.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 21, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 7 recs
Awesome response
Thanks a ton. You’ve informed my thinking about all this greatly. Very informative and detailed stuff :)
A program. And rifles.
My pleasure. There’s a lot of history and millions of very talented people in the former Eastern bloc, but they are held back by a system that is a weird combination of Soviet-era bureaucracy, turn of the century American robber baron capitalism and banana-republic levels organized crime.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 21, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Very helpful information and it is very true that wrestling at the high school level has seen some interesting from kids who watch mma fighting. I have been a wrestling coach of a couple of years and almost all of the kids watch the UFC.
by Darren Watkins on May 21, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Keep up the good work, man. It was a lean couple of decades for wrestling, but it’s coming back in a big way because of the transition to MMA.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 21, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Takedowns are worth far too much points.
People don’t hate wrestling for ‘frustrating the evolution of the sport’.
People hate wrestling because its effective under a flawed scoring system. If you lay on top for 3 rounds you automatically win… but if you lay on top for an infinite ammount of time you will never ever win. Thats why wrestling needs to be recalibrated.
so instead of letting the guy who lays on top for 3 rounds winning we should let the guy letting on the bottom win?
If the guy on the bottom is attempting submissions
and nullifying the movement of the guy on top that should count for something.
it should, but people need to stop acting like it doesn’t ever happen. A takedown and doing nothing is infinitely better than getting taken down and doing nothing.
actually, both are worth no points. Doing nothing should never be worth points. The way Mo for instance ‘punched’ (jake shields vs miller same story)… its just not going to do anything. Maybe they should be stood up and have points deducted for stalling if they do it more than twice.
Nothing is worth points. But getting a takedown is doing something, whereas getting taken down is doing nothing.
Attempting submission from your back is doing something
While defending submissions and being unable to strike while on top is doing nothing. Being on top shouldn’t be enough unless you are working to damage.
The most important part is that you can make takedowns all day but they wont finish (not counting slams ofcourse). The point of a judge decision is to extrapolate who would have won the fight if there was no time limit, but as it is now the scoring strongly favors a lay n pray attitude… this causes fighters to be able to rely ONLY on their wrestling without having to use finishing techniques.
The big difference between wrestling and most other arts is the fact that wrestling does not intend to truly incapacitate an opponent (leaving you free to take his pants or whatever). It rather intends to hold a person down for the duration of a fight.
There are many wrestlers out there fighting great MMA fights… but theres also a good bunch that needs to learn how to GnP and submit before they can actually win a fight rather than make it an infinite draw. The scoring system as it is now does not encourage that.
tl;dr: Position play is nice, but if you can’t make good of your position (submit, strike) it’s not really worth awarding a win on the scorecards. What would you say of a Machida-esque footwork guy who constantly controls the distance but never lands a punch?
To answer your last question. www.watchkalibrun.com
by Patrick John McGreevy on May 21, 2010 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I think what really pissed people off was Voice's dismissal of boxing and wrestling as not being martial arts.
If you're not watching Treme, you're a bad person.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on May 21, 2010 1:31 PM EDT reply actions
Thought
Wrestlers tend to do well because they actually get themselves well rounded standing up/on the ground. Wrestling isn’t really about finishing or defense standing or on the ground, so they actually work on the whole offensive/defensive game in both areas.
So many of these BJJ guys are terrible on their feet (Maia) because they think “well I can’t stand up, but if I can just get it to the ground!” and so many strikers are worthless on the ground (Kongo) because they think “if I can just keep it standing, who cares about the ground!”. They think they have to win with their strength and don’t evolve the other part of the game. Wrestlers meanwhile basically start with a blank slate as far as on the ground/standing fighting. They won’t end up nearly as good at either ground/standing as a BJJ/striker background, but they can take/keep that guy where he doesn’t want to be.
I think if the other disciplines were more willing to train the shit out of what they are weak in and actually get good there, it’d be a different story…….and it’s not like the guys that really do that haven’t found success: Penn (BJJ→boxing), Anderson (MT/BJJ) Jacare’s standup looking pretty good and Mir just for a few examples.
Being strong in one area and weak in the other is a dead end as far as championship aspirations go.
Not afraid to nitpick
by joker24 on May 21, 2010 2:15 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Yup.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 21, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Fitch batters Diego Sanchez, not Paulo Thiago.

"...ride life straight to perfect laughter,
it's the only good fight there is."

by 













