The Martial Art Called Wrestling, Part 2
It seems that the discussion in response to Michael Schiavello's anti-wrestling screed is still reverberating around the blogosphere. We addressed it at Bloody Elbow on Tuesday, but Ben Fowlkes has added quite a bit to the discussion and he raises the cautionary tale of Antonio McKee:
A decorated wrestler in California, McKee's MMA record stands at an impressive 24-3-2. So why isn't the UFC, or any major organization, in a hurry to pick him up? Most likely it's because 18 of those victories came via methodical, plodding decisions. Even when McKee vows not to go to decision, he wins by decision.
He hasn't lost a fight since 2003, and yet of the 13 victories he's piled up since that defeat, only two have avoided going to the judges' scorecards. One was a submission victory over the 13-13 Rodrigo Ruiz in March. The other? A TKO via knee injury against Gabe Rivas in 2007. McKee may very well be the best fighter with the least fan recognition, all because of how he chooses (quite unapologetically, in fact) to win fights.
Still, to friend and fellow wrestler Lawal, the state of McKee's career says more about fans and MMA media than it does about McKee.
"If you're winning, people need to make you fight a different fight," says Lawal. "You want to see a guy like Antonio McKee brawl? Stop his takedowns. You can't stop his takedowns? Why should he do you a favor and brawl with you? It's like you have Michael Schiavello saying that wrestling is hurting MMA. That's the dumbest s--- I've ever heard. And I like him, but it's ridiculous to say that."
Fowlkes has an interesting take on the topic and he also discusses the balancing act grapplers face in MMA -- do they stand and bang in an effort to please the fans while risking a loss or do they stick to what they know best and risk not making it to the big show?
George Sotiropolous (HT MMA for Real) comments on his blog:
This sport is MMA - mixed martial arts.
It is a mixed sport and there is more than just one way to win a fight. After all, isn't that why everybody loves the sport? It's unpredictable, unique and offers its competitors various different ways to fight and gain success. Despite all this, some top fighters have recently come under criticism for the manner in which they have utilised one set skill to dominate an overmatched opponent.
...
I will never boo a fight or become bored of a mixed martial arts match. I think all fighting is interesting, irrespective of whether it takes place standing or on the ground. The reality of the situation is, mixed martial arts encompasses everything. There are all sorts of fighters in MMA - strikers, grapplers, wrestlers, kick-boxers, boxers, you name it - and they all have their favourite ways to fight and finish fights. That's what makes it such an interesting sport. You then have many of the new breed who have been brought up on mixed martial arts and are fast becoming well-equipped in all facets of the game. That makes the sport even more exciting and competitive....
The freedom and purity of the sport are the two things that really attracted me to it in the first place. I like experimenting with styles and being in a position to win a fight in any number of ways. The sport is called mixed martial arts for a reason, and I wouldn't have it any other way.
And finally Maggie Hendricks, possibly one of the most knowledgeable wrestling fans writing about MMA today adds her $0.02:
Is it boring, or is it that not enough MMA fans get wrestling?
"I think they are not as educated as they could be," says former Division II national champion and current UFC number one heavyweight contender Shane Carwin. "I see a lot of technically great grappling matches and you can almost always hear someone scream, 'stand them up.' And yet what you are seeing is a technical masterpiece. I think in time people will begin to appreciate all aspects."
As a longtime wrestling fan, I tend to agree with Carwin. Many times, what others see as "lay and pray," I see as two athletes fighting for position. I would rather watch a technical bout like that than a brawl where two fighters are swinging wildly but rarely landing any punches.
I have to agree with Maggie. My fear ever since the massive success of the entertaining but deeply sloppy Griffin vs Bonner fight in the first TUF finale has been that MMA would degenerate into bad kick boxing. Let's hope we don't see a backlash where talented wrestlers like Koschek and Lawal forget their wrestling in a misguided effort to please the fans.
Antonio McKee though, maybe he should reconsider his approach.
146 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The only problem I have
with certain, not all, fighters is when they use their wrestling to essentially stall the action to a crawl, while inflicting little or no damage of their own, looking to ride out a win, as opposed to taking a victory. See Joe Warren during this season of Bellator or how Mousasi out struck King Mo from his back almost 2-1 in their fight. 2 horrible wins IMO.
It’s actually entertaining and more impressive when when a wrestler can actually do something with a take down, like Bones Jones or Phil Davis.
@fjbar on twitter...formerly El Mexicutioner
by _Felix_ on May 20, 2010 4:18 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
word homie
"When i get in there, in his face ,pressin the action,I'm RUFF NECKIN'EM,I'm throwin him around,I'm punchin him,hes punchin me, I'm eatin his shots and I'm Blastin him back in the face he's not goin to be able to handle it ." - Chris Leben on how his fight with Anderson Silva is gonna go.
by Rayce. on May 20, 2010 4:25 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I think that's what most people have a problem with
Wrestling is great. It’s a fantastic base to learn mma. You get:
-mental toughness from incredibly hard workouts.
-Good physical conditioning from being in constant shape (when applied correctly. Lookin at you, Mark Coleman).
-Experience cutting weight.
-Exceptional balance in things like scrambles and preventing takedowns because you practice them so much and gain the muscle memory.
-The ability to take a fight to the ground. This is so incredibly important I can’t even list all the ways. Let’s just example it with “you just got clobbered in the standup and in order not to lose immediately, you shoot a double and gain time to recover.”
etc.
The problem many fans with watching a wrestler fight is when they game the system – not trying to finish, but ride out a decision. Is it smart? Sure. Is it aesthetically pleasing? Not so much.
http://mixedmartialartsblogger.wordpress.com/
by Cory Braiterman on May 20, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions
i love jits, i love take downs but if you arent trying to end the fight once you get it to the ground.... Whats the point of the take down?
I hate when fighters plan on going to a decision. king mo vs moooooosassy is a good example of the wrestler taking more damage and never attempting /coming close to ending the fight, yet getting the W.
"When i get in there, in his face ,pressin the action,I'm RUFF NECKIN'EM,I'm throwin him around,I'm punchin him,hes punchin me, I'm eatin his shots and I'm Blastin him back in the face he's not goin to be able to handle it ." - Chris Leben on how his fight with Anderson Silva is gonna go.
by Rayce. on May 20, 2010 4:51 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I really think there are better examples than Mousasi-King Mo. King Mo dominated that fight.
How did I end up on this bandwagon and why does everything say property of Chael Sonnen?
Mo tried to end the fight until he got tired...
If you posture up and throw 120+ strikes you are trying to finish.
If you ate like Rashad vs T Silva and land almost as many take downs as strikes (21 total in the whole fight) then you are laying and praying.
Any wrestler who is making attempts to pass gaurd and mount ioffence from the ground is not LnP to me.
your example is better then mine.
But I feel like y’all got the spirit of what I was saying. Its a fight! You should try and win by tap ,snap or nap. Not a decision. Those are the fights I don’t like. Where they don’t ever try to end it. If everyone is trying to end the fight and it goes to a decision so be it. But for goodness sakes don’t plan on going to the cards.
"When i get in there, in his face ,pressin the action,I'm RUFF NECKIN'EM,I'm throwin him around,I'm punchin him,hes punchin me, I'm eatin his shots and I'm Blastin him back in the face he's not goin to be able to handle it ." - Chris Leben on how his fight with Anderson Silva is gonna go.
by Rayce. on May 20, 2010 5:35 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Word to Big Bird!
Mousasi put in work from his back, and Mo’s face looked like he got hit by George Foreman.
LnP TC with weak GnP is boring.
If you allow knees to the head and 12-6 elbows, ground fights would be a lot less boring.
Elephant in the room - wrestling makes for terrible viewing
Its not a question of “getting” wrestling. I get the scrambles, the takedowns, the transitions and jockeying for position. Its just dull. Wrestling is gradual. Moving from one position to another without being able to apply anything else makes the seconds tick down much slower.
It’s as boring as watching someone play a game instead of playing it yourself.
It can get even worse with a GSP Hardy style matchup where one guy is so overmatched that there isn’t even offense returned. I shudder to think I would have to pay to watch Antonio McKee.
Of course, there are some wrestlers who are great to watch. Fitch is a great example. His fight against Thiago was the definition of a clinic. Bones is going to be awesome to watch as he grows.
Agreed. There’s nothing to “get” about wrestling. I just think a lot of older fans were attracted to the sport primarily because of the knockouts/submissions that were more prevalent in past years.
the rate of decision/knock out/submission
have been pretty consistent throughout the lifetime of the sport.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
ugh
For crying out loud. That isn’t an elephant in the room at all, it’s just your opinion. Quit shoving your standards on the rest of the world. It’s annoying.
Look. Many, many people enjoy wrestling and the wrestling aspect of MMA (assuming of course we’re not talking about real lay’n’prayers). This is a fact. To say wrestling is boring or not exciting is simply not true. It may be boring according to your preference and opinion, which is perfectly cool and acceptable, but that’s it. It’s just your preference. That’s as far as it goes.
So quit acting like very considerable amounts of people don’t like it.
Hello. I take stuff too seriously.
by The Flying Gentleman on May 20, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
that’s not his opinion, it’s an accurate generality about the american population. I’m a wrestler and like to watch some wrestling, but it does in large part make for terrible viewing in the eyes of most people. that’s why the only pure wrestling ever shown on TV is the NCAA championships on ESPN 77 and the olympics.
it’s true that very considerable amounts of people don’t like it
by Stillberry on May 20, 2010 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
To which i’ll say of the two biggest draws in UFC history one is basically a one dimensional wrestler and the other is elite in many areas including wrestling and uses it often. So i have numbers to back me up. What do you have to back up your claim that " most people" find wrestling boring? Sherdog? Or should i just trust you?
So i think your a little off the pulse of the “American population”.
Hello. I take stuff too seriously.
by The Flying Gentleman on May 20, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions
wow, you really are a pompous ass and love straw men. People watch GSP and Lesnar because they wrestle people down and then beat their faces into hamburger meat.
i’m talking about most of all people, not most MMA fans. nobody watches pure wrestling, they watch MMA because includes the possibility of dudes getting their faces bashed in, which GSP and Lesnar do. GSP and Lesnar would not be the biggest draws if they fought like fucking Antonio McKee, who literally just wrestles people without doing shit.
i’m downplaying wrestling as a whole, not suggesting that guys with wrestling bases who do plenty of other exciting shit can’t be big draws.
by Stillberry on May 20, 2010 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Good points
Wrestling is an integral part of MMA, but it should be a conduit for other stuff, not the only element itself.
There is a reason the NCAA basketball tourney is on CBS, while the wrestling championship is on PBS or ESPN U down on the dial.
Lets not pretend like Lesnar and GSP are huge draws due to solely to their fighting style. They are too of the best characters in the sport. People don’t buy Lesnar pay per views thinking “sweet, I’m going to be able to see some legit NCAA level wrestling.”
"I am a man who pisses largely and frequently, which they say is a sign of great mental activity" -Henry Miller-
just a question
why do you so often come at people with this insulting attitude? you seem to throw in a some sort of snarky dig every time you disagree with someone. you did the same thing when i stated my disappointment of GSP not finishing Hardy, even tho its obvious I respect GSP.
just chill the fuck out dude
I'll suggest you do what I did
and add him to your ignore list. Whenever I see a comment that’s smarmy and full of logical fallacies, I check for his handle and then promptly skip it.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Keep in mind where GSP came from and...
It’s only since the Serra loss that he’s relied on the top control special. He originally became a fan favorite due to his personality and interesting, dynamic style. He was landing superman punches, throwing high kicks, taking guys down and pounding on them, etc. He became more cautious when that style resulted in a fluke KO.
Brock is another animal in that he came to the UFC with a fan base from the WWE and a curious public. He also tends to keep his fights standing and looks to finish fights when he does take them to the ground.
An mma fan with any sense of fan dynamic will likely agree that a typical casual UFC fan dislikes fights that go to the ground without any action. Hell, I’m an avid follower of mma with a background in collegiate style wrestling and jiu jitsu, and lay ‘n pray bores me to tears. There’s a reason that fights heavy on this style get booed so fiercely.
Notice that we aren’t discussing active top control here, we’re talking about boring, uninteresting lay ‘n pray. As Stillberry points out, your straw men arguments are pretty weak. The superior tone you tend to use doesn’t give them any extra weight.
"The mat is my church, the ground is my heaven, Jiu-Jitsu is my religion. And once you hit the ground you're in my world..."
I think it can be inferred by the lack of professional leagues that despite the proliferation of wrestling as a sport in high school and college that a considerable amount of people don’t like it.
How did I end up on this bandwagon and why does everything say property of Chael Sonnen?
a considerable amount of people don’t like WATCHING it on TV, regardless of whether or not they like the sport.
I don't understand at all...
Where did Michael Schiavello actually say wrestling is hurting MMA in his own words?
He basically says that fighters need to evolve to stop it in the last paragraph. Apparently, nobody reads entire articles anymore.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Seriously
I read the whole thing and thought is was an amazing piece on why fans should learn to love wrestling and why it’s so vital to the sport. This entire “backlash” is confusing.
ALL OF YOU LISTEN TO MEE, DON'T DISTURB HERE, I WILL CALL POLICE CATCH YOU, DON'T COME TO MY BANGOLOW HOUSE, UNDERSTAND, O.K. I HATE ALL OF YOU.
by Chris Barton on May 20, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions
There is a lot of idiocy in some of the recent MMA Media reaction to stuff. MDS tried to tell me Overeem was ranked #4 at HW, and now Antonio McKee can’t read an entire column.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 20, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I really hate when people bring up Antonio McKee and how he should be fighitng in the UFC becasue of his record. Lets be honest Antonio McKee has racked up alot of the record agasint sub par competition that he really should not be going to decisions against. Its not like he got that record fighting the best or even mid level competition in his weight class now. Any time he has come across good to mid level competition he has lost or it was a draw. His most difficult fight was against Karo and he got beat in a easy 30-27 decision.
Actually, I think he actually beat Karo in that fight, but that’s a different topic.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 20, 2010 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions
You might want to see that fight again, there is no way McKee won that fight.
by Nightwhistler on May 20, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions
And Karo is a WW. But he’s clearly good enough to be in the UFC. Not signing him has nothing to do with his ability, like it would if MMA were a real sport. The reason the UFC doesn’t sign him is they don’t want a boring fighter beating exciting fighters, or they just don’t want a boring fighter, period. They’d rather keep on Phil Baroni.
That’s part of it, but McKee is rather old. He talks about retiring constantly.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 20, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
my other problem with McKee
that MFC belt everywhere, in every corner he works, tied to his back, Tim Sylvia and Tito Ortiz style a small decade ago, please……..
neh, no signature
I’d shower in the belt if I had won the championship
How did I end up on this bandwagon and why does everything say property of Chael Sonnen?
by Day Man on May 20, 2010 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Winning ugly vs losing pretty
I have yet to see MMA fans punish a losing fighter who put on an exciting fight. And i have yet to see Dana do it either. We could sit here for an hour and come up with guys who always bring it into the cage, even though their records aren’t up to par with Antonio McKee’s (rolls eyes), guys who we can’t wait to watch fight again. So maybe some of those wrestlers should be less concerned with not losing and more concrened with how they’re winning.
I think Maggie is right,
Some mma fans are just poorly educated. Take wrestling classes or join a wrestling club, you will learn to have an appreciation for “lay and pray”.
"If your going to come on then come on!" - Harold Howard
Should fans take boxing lessons because they don’t like two counter-punchers swapping feints the whole round?
Inhale deep, like the words of my breath—I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death
by Anthony Pace on May 20, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I don’t agree.
I don’t think education is the problem at all. Most fans boo because of the stalling tactics on the ground. Sure, some boo when a fight hits the ground instantly, and as Luke would say — they should be thrown in front of a bus.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 20, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions
They have money, though, Leland. You can either throw 98% of the public in front of the bus, or you can try to address the fact that you will be limited to niche sport status unless something changes.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 20, 2010 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, yeah… I know. I get that part of it.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on May 20, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't really care if it stays a niche sport
The sport is doing just fine and the fewer meatheads calling groundwork “gay” (as a lot of my non-MMA viewing friends do) the better.
Of course, once I displayed the double leg on one of them he shut up.
Get rid of the ramp!
by ihateemo on May 20, 2010 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
thats when you choke them.
"When i get in there, in his face ,pressin the action,I'm RUFF NECKIN'EM,I'm throwin him around,I'm punchin him,hes punchin me, I'm eatin his shots and I'm Blastin him back in the face he's not goin to be able to handle it ." - Chris Leben on how his fight with Anderson Silva is gonna go.
by Rayce. on May 20, 2010 5:36 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
more than the “is wrestling ruining the spot” thing…I’m annoyed by the idea that a brawl like Griffin/Bonnar or Jung/Garcia can’t be good fights because they’re not “technical” enough.
This isn’t pro wrestling, the idea that there is some technical proficiency level that must be made to achieve greatness. Corrales vs. Castillo I, Gatti/Ward, Griffin/Bonnar, Jung/Garcia. Those are all great combat sports fights.
Obviously the best moments in the sport are when great technique intersects great drama. But I’ll take watching Jung/Garcia or Bonnar/Griffin any day of the week over watching Mo work dominant position for 5 rounds.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on May 20, 2010 4:43 PM EDT reply actions 8 recs
Agreed on all accounts. I think watching Koscheck and Mo are great, but its because I like their personalities. However, if those guys didn’t have some schtick, they would bore me to death. If all you can do is wrestle, you better be a fan favorite, or one helluva heel.
Did you see the size of that chicken?
Had to rec this one
Inhale deep, like the words of my breath—I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death
by Anthony Pace on May 20, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Obviously the best moments in the sport are when great technique intersects great drama. But I’ll take watching Jung/Garcia or Bonnar/Griffin any day of the week over watching Mo work dominant position for 5 rounds.
Me too and I liked the Mo-Mousasi fight
How did I end up on this bandwagon and why does everything say property of Chael Sonnen?
Ditto
The only thing worse than anti-wrestling buffoonery is anti-brawling snobbery.
by Steve4192 on May 20, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Fair point but when two guys agree to only "stand and bang"
I’ve got a problem with it, if I wanted to watch second rate boxing/kickboxing I’d watch it. I love watching two guys go toe to toe but only if there’s a possibility of a kick or take down.
Check out my pic a day for a year project-
Life Through My Lens
Oh...yeah...
I mean, don’t get me wrong. There is beauty in watching someone positionally dominate someone for every second of a fight. It’s incredible. But that doesn’t make it a great watch.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on May 20, 2010 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions
sure
but for every Griffin vs Bonnar there are a dozen Jorge Gurgel fights that just suck. Griffin vs Bonnar was a great fight, but it’s not much of a role model.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
Yeah...but that's EVERY fight...
for every Maia/MacDonald there plenty of Askren/Thomas with two guys flailing around on the ground. For every GSP positionally dominant performance with his wrestling there is stuff like an Antonio McKee fight where he literally tries to do nothing for 90% of the fight beyond getting takedowns. For every Silva/Griffin where counterpunching provides an explosive result there are tons of fights where the fighters circle for 90% of the fight because no one will pull the trigger.
It’s not just brawls that have good and bad.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on May 21, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
These things can all be true
Yes, McKee and Mo are right: why should they fight a different way? To please the fans? Fuck that – the point is to win. If I am a fighter, and I have a method that gives me a .999 winning percentage, I am going to keep doing it.
But at the same time, “entertainment” is subjective. I train BJJ and have wrestled in the past- I “get” the intricacies of both disciplines. Doesn’t mean I have to enjoy a wrestler who maintains top position and does very little damage. I also don’t have to enjoy a guy who employs a masterful defensive guard while offering up little in the way of offense.
I can enjoy a sloppy brawl like Griffin/Bonnar and still be an educated fan.
BOOSH
Yes, McKee and Mo are right: why should they fight a different way? To please the fans? Fuck that – the point is to win.
If that is their point then fine, however, I think for most of these guys the point is to make money and to do that you need to both win and get the fans excited to pay to see you fight.
How did I end up on this bandwagon and why does everything say property of Chael Sonnen?
TRUE.
At the end of the day it is truly about making money. PERIOD.
I don’t care how great you are at whatever discipline you’re great at. If fans don’t care to pay to see you fight then have fun competing in obscurity.
"There's nothing cool about taking punishment" - Floyd Mayweather Jr.
by VeeisAnimated on May 20, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Also, unrelated:
Stiropolous should have his grappling pants-but-not-really-pants outfits outlawed.
BOOSH
i agree. gloves should be outlawed too.
They fuck with your grip while grappling and keep you from breaking your hand easily while punching. They are clearly an advantage for strikers.
"When i get in there, in his face ,pressin the action,I'm RUFF NECKIN'EM,I'm throwin him around,I'm punchin him,hes punchin me, I'm eatin his shots and I'm Blastin him back in the face he's not goin to be able to handle it ." - Chris Leben on how his fight with Anderson Silva is gonna go.
by Rayce. on May 20, 2010 5:23 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I lurk around here alot but have felt compelled to coment until now. In sports you win however you can, within the context of the rules. You have to go with what brought you to the dance to begin with. If that is wrestling then wrestle. The flip side is the fans pay to see fights that interest them. If most fans, educated or otherwise, do not like to watch grappling they wil turn the channel. The fans pay the bills, if a fighter wants to be the best at any cost and cannot draw fans they will simply not get paid. If you want the paper you have to put butts in the seats. Personally I love to watch good grappling, I am the minority.
Easy solution: Allow knees to the head of downed opponents.
Just like that, the ground game becomes 100x more interesting.
by HappyLittleTreez on May 20, 2010 4:52 PM EDT reply actions 11 recs
THIS!!!!!!!
"I’m not going to stop yelling because that would mean, I lost the fight!"-Kenny Powers
shooter/cutter for AllElbows.com and MMAFighting.com, mma enthusiast
That is certainly a fine solution, but it is far from easy.
Getting the athletic commissions across the country to change the rules will be an arduous process. It’s going to take a ton of effort and the only company capable of putting in that effort is Zuffa, and they are kind of busy right now with their sanctioning efforts.
THAT would be great too, however
To improve the current system really just requires some tweaks.
1. Give the refs specific criteria for standing up, with some room left for them to determine applicability (such as when Maia is on the bottom and doesn’t want to get up). Have a known system of warnings for activity/positional improvement before standing up AND a system for point deductions. For example, within each round, allow 2 warnings per occurance, maybe one at 30 seconds and a 2nd after only 15-20 seconds (and only if legitimate activity occured after the first warning). Now, if this happens a second time within a round, it is one 15 second warning and then an automatic point deduction.
2. The next part simply involves changing compensation such that finishes in whatever form (KO / TKO / submission) result in a considerably larger purse for the winner.
Although the details listed in #1 could be argued and changed, just these two things and the problem would be largely solved.
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Exactly. The current unified rules cater a little to much to wrestling.
Time to mix things up on the ground a little.
And I would add
The same principle should apply to work in the clinch as well. No matter how distasteful some may find these proposed changes, the reality is that if the “watchability” factor isn’t high, the sport stops growing like it has.
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions
This is why promoters started rigging wrestling matches a century ago. When it comes to unarmed combat with rules to prevent deaths, smart wrestlers can drag things out interminably. There’s a reason no one ever tries to wrestle in a war; they’ll be killed in seconds for exposing their necks and vital organs to weaponry or fatal strikes. It’s just the nature of the MMA beast – while knee strikes to the head would go a long, long way, I just think there needs to be a change in ref standup rules. You already get points for the takedown; after that, you have a certain amount of time to advance your position or inflict damage. If the person is good at defending from their back, they don’t get any real points form that; just take them down again. Why do we say, “Just learn how to defend wrestling” to the Hardy’s of the world instead of saying, “Just learn to actually inflict damage” to the McKee’s and Shields?
I can tell you this much, it kills casual fans to see a fight go to the ground. The UFC was lucky that Shogun ended 113 the way he did, because there were a lot of people pissed at the bar before that.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 20, 2010 4:53 PM EDT reply actions
Really? UFC113 was one of the most exciting cards in months imo… and the whole Daley/Koscheck turning mega-heel thing was great.
In your opinion, sure. You’re also posting on an MMA website, so you’re already in. But do you think ESPN suits were impressed by Koscheck humping Daley’s leg for fifteen minutes? The entire aftershow was dedicated to the one punch NOT thrown during that fight, the one knee not landed, Shogun, and a small cameo from Mitrione. There was no technical discussion of Kos/Daley at all. Is he a heel, and will that draw viewers? Remains to be seen. But it’s interesting that wrestlers are having to resort to pro wrestling tactics (Sonnen, Kos) to sell their fights.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 20, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions
It may piss or turn off casuals but mma is what it is. It’s a blend of all the combat sports. Some may not find it enjoyable to watch a wrestler but it’s part of the sport. Maybe more fighters should learn to avoid the takedown or reverse the position.
Root for the home team jack ass
by KING FEDOR on May 20, 2010 5:15 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Problem is, it doesn’t have to be like that. It certainly wasn’t in Pride, in part because of faster standups and knees to the head. I understand why takedowns are important. On the other hand, you didn’t answer my question as to why the person on the top shouldn’t be required to actually inflict damage to gain points and avoid a restart on the feet.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 20, 2010 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry I was enchanted. I don’t have an issue with sanding them up at some point
Root for the home team jack ass
by KING FEDOR on May 20, 2010 5:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It’s not that people dislike wrestling in all it’s facets. It’s that people dislike inactivity. It doesn’t matter if it’s two counterstrikers looking at each other for the whole fight or a wrestler gaining top position and not actively improving position. If the fighters are actively grappling like say Guida they will often become fan favorites just like if they’re actively striking.
Google Ron Paul!
Part of the problem is how fights are scored
Lay on a guy for a round, 10-9.
Punch the crap out of a guy, 10-9.
The system is imported from boxing, where there are ten rounds and everyone fights the same style. Wrestling isn’t scored that way – you get points for certain moves (I think).
Change the scoring and keep standing them up when they aren’t improving position.
But hey – you need takedown defense in the sport. No quesetion.
by Clifford J on May 20, 2010 5:00 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I’ve learned to drown out the stand em up crowd at the bars I watch MMA at. I don’t really get the issue. I know at times it can be a tad boring but it is a part of the sport. I think in more cases then not the fighters are stood up way to early. It sometimes appears that accomplished wrestlers are being punished for being good at their craft. Wouldn’t it be silly if the ref said to two fighters in the midst of mixing it up on their feet “okay that’s enough of that punching and kicking. Get on the mat and wrestle”
Root for the home team jack ass
by KING FEDOR on May 20, 2010 5:01 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Because punching and kicking can actually end a fight. Wrestling can’t, unless it is used to set up punches or kicks or submissions.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 20, 2010 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Is this considered wrestling?

For the most part, I agree.
Inhale deep, like the words of my breath—I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death
by Anthony Pace on May 20, 2010 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Johnny Jones separated Hamil’s shoulder with a throw that pretty much ended the fight. Thiago Silva snapped James Irvin’s ACL with a throw. It does happen
How did I end up on this bandwagon and why does everything say property of Chael Sonnen?
Exactly. But did either of those happen in a ground battle while jockeying endlessly for position over the course of three minutes?
by Tim the Enchanter on May 20, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions
No, that’s a headbutt out of a wicked cool powerbomb . Let me know when GSP or Shields does anything like that to get out of a triangle and we’ll consider that part of the wrestling repetoire.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 20, 2010 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think you can really tell
Inhale deep, like the words of my breath—I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death
by Anthony Pace on May 20, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
this is pretty much just strength i guess
Inhale deep, like the words of my breath—I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death
by Anthony Pace on May 20, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions
If GSP power-bombed somebody...
…he’d reach a whole ’nother level of Awesome, and Mandy Moore would lose her mind.
It can be used to set up a finish or avoid a loss. This isn’t K1.
Root for the home team jack ass
by KING FEDOR on May 20, 2010 5:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
it also sometimes appears that accomplished wrestlers are overly rewarded by the judges for takedown that they dont do anything with, or even for takedown that lead to them taking damage
That may be the case but my issue is the early standing up of the fighters
Root for the home team jack ass
by KING FEDOR on May 20, 2010 5:19 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I can only remember a few cases where there was an early stand-up (I thougth Nelson-Arlovski was criminal) but a lot more cases where a guy grounds out 60% of the round without inflicting damage, attempting submissions or improving position.
How did I end up on this bandwagon and why does everything say property of Chael Sonnen?
Just to muddy the waters...
What about the bjj / sambo / judo guys who pull guard when their standup is ineffective or they are getting dominated? Where do we draw the line between genuinely working for submissions and just trying to control position?
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions
allow stomps or knees to the head of downed fighter, and the but scooting phenomena would evaporate.
True
That is completely true, but I was talking more about comparing the complaints about wrestling to those about the bjj guys when it comes to stalling.
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think this is “wrestling” itself that’s causing the issue. I think it’s the judging that gives wrestling an unfair advantage that’s causing the issue.
A high level wrestler will get a takedown eventually. Usually it doesn’t matter who they are facing, eventually, they’ll get the takedown. And in our current judging system as soon as anyone gets a takedown and stays with it for at least thirty seconds you can give them the round without fail.
The only way to negate that? The other fighter has to get a takedown themselves. Nothing else will get them the round short of complete obliteration of the opponent.
In some way, I think people are blaming the sport of wrestling, and the wrestlers themselves for the system. I don’t remember ever seeing this backlash prior to this. And as of late, there have been several decisions where it came down to solely takedowns.
Until the judging is changed to better fit the concept of Mixed Martial Arts we won’t see a change. Wrestlers will play it safe to get relatively safe victories, and fans will become more and more enraged as time goes on.
by Hawk52 on May 20, 2010 5:17 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
the judging that gives wrestling an unfair advantage that’s causing the issue.
yes.
"I’m not going to stop yelling because that would mean, I lost the fight!"-Kenny Powers
shooter/cutter for AllElbows.com and MMAFighting.com, mma enthusiast
How would you change judging to make it more “fair” ?
by Darren Watkins on May 20, 2010 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Make effective striking worth as much as a single takedown. And increase the value of effective defensive grappling.
As it right now, you can be firing off a submission from the bottom every thirty seconds and the judges will still give the round to the top fighter.
Trying to actually end the fight means nothing as it stands right now grappling wise.
That “One takedown wins the round” line wasn’t a joke. Once you start judging on that scale you’ll be amazed how often it applies. Once a single effective takedown happens, the round goes to that fighter 99% of the time.
As it right now, you can be firing off a submission from the bottom every thirty seconds and the judges will still give the round to the top fighter.
If your firing up submissions every 30 seconds you should lose the round, because they are obviously not coming anywhere close to catching your opponent. Landing one or two really good catches from the bottom is more meaning than just attempting a bunch of submissions which immediately fail.
but under current judging the “one or two really good catches” still loses them the round even if the guy on top really does nothing
I disagree.
Judges pay attention when there is a legit catch. For instance, all three judges gave Mayhem Miller the third round of his fight with Jake Shields by scoring one legit catch (the RNC at the end of the round). Shields completely dominated the first 4:30 seconds of that round with positional control but lost the round due to one legit catch.
Judges do score catches, they just don’t score half-assed attempts that are immediately shucked off.
First, it takes two to tango. If a takedown occurs, and the bottom man doesn’t do anything but close guard and hang on, why should they be stood up? Most of the time, it is the bottom guy who is causing the inaction. Second, with the evolution of MMA and BJJ, throwing up a traditional triangle or armbar is like throwing a jab. If it lands great, but most of the time you have to use them as a set up. Why should failed submission attempts count more than weak hammer fists or body shots from top position? This whole argument has been beat to death on numerous articles. Generally speaking, people want to say that “tough man” competitions are what “casuals” want to see. Wrestling/Grappling is 50% of MMA so if you aren’t a fan of 50% of a sport, you will never be satisfied watching. MMA PPVs seem to be doing fine so I am tired of people making a mountain out of a mole hill.
More refereeing than judging, but...
Give the refs specific criteria for standing up, with some room left for them to determine applicability (such as when Maia is on the bottom and doesn’t want to get up).
Have a known system of warnings for activity/positional improvement before standing up AND a system for point deductions.
For example, within each round, allow 2 warnings per occurance, maybe one at 30 seconds and a 2nd after only 15-20 seconds (and only if legitimate activity occured after the first warning). Now, if this happens a second time within a round, it is one 15 second warning and then an automatic point deduction.
This doesn’t (and shouldn’t) completely eliminate it, but it would help.
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions
What do you guys consider ineffective punches from the top guy? Why should the top guy who is controlling the bottom guy and still working to damage the bottom guy be punished b/c of the the bottom guy sucks at wrestling?
Why reward a guy for sucking at one aspect of MMA?
by Darren Watkins on May 20, 2010 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Hmm...
Second part first – you don’t. Learn some damn TDD, sweeps or submissions…
As to your first question, I look at the difference of say GSP-Hardy or Lesner-Mir as opposed to Kos-Daley where Kos was seemingly not putting any power into his shots, just trying to control.
Of course, the obvious counter-point to that would be Shieds-Hendo where Shields appeared to be trying to finish, but is simply not a powerful enough striker to do so.
I guess imo, its a judgement thing – if they are only taking soft, short shots, never posturing up, not using elbows…hmm…I see your point.
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions
When have we started equating wrestling and jiu-jitsu? There’s nothing boring about a dominant wrestler who can also pass and finish people, what people are complaining about are grapplers who are masters of taking their opponent down and controlling the positions, but can’t finish.
Also, I think non-wrestlers have been getting dramatically better at standing up and preventing takedowns recently. So between this and wrestlers learning submissions, I don’t think we’ll have boring fights.
the real reason wrestlers have done well
wrestling is in every school in America, high school, college even middle school that creates a HUGE pool to draw from. A crappy 4A school will crush a 1A school 90% of the time in any sport because they have 4 times as many people to draw from to form a team. Wrestling has done well because it has tens of thousands of wrestlers to draw from that practice 5 days a week in high school and college.
Imagine if muay thia was in every school like wrestling and you got to draw from that huge of a pool of muay thia fighters who practices 5 days a week from middle school on up…..same thing for jiu-jitsu etc. It is not that wrestling is a superior art of combat it is just a matter of math.
A crappy 4A school will crush a 1A school 90% of the time
In California a lot of the 1A schools (their CA equivalent) are private schools that offer scholarships (and can crush much larger schools) but your point is definitely valid.
How did I end up on this bandwagon and why does everything say property of Chael Sonnen?
As an aside to that
This is why Brock’s D-1 champ wrestling will destroy Shane’s D-2 wrestling…they are not even remotely close to even…and Cain is somewhere betweeen them…
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Seems to me like there are 2 sides that will never agree, to me if you can’t stop a guy from taking you down and keeping you there you lost period. I’m tired of the crying and complaining from fans of guys who can’t stop takedowns and can’t get up from being taken down. Learn some takedown defense and submissions or go into K1 because i’m not going to shed a tear because you can’t beat a wrestler.
by Nightwhistler on May 20, 2010 5:46 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Me either...
First and foremost, if you don’t want to be taken down, learn some effective TDD.
Think of Chuck for starters, he was a striker, through and through in his MMA career, but he had the luxury of doing that because of his great sprawl and overall TDD. Or think of Machida, even though in his case it is primarily sumo training that keeps him standing until he wants to go down
If you want to win, you have to go with what gives you the best chance of winning…sometimes that is using your strength, whatever that may be, and sometimes that is using your opponents weakness even if that is not your strength.
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Another wrestling post, another NFL analogy
Here’s a marketing concept: Tell your current and prospective fans that the reason they don’t like a large portion of your product is because they’re too stupid and unrefined to properly appreciate it.
I might not know much about wrestling, but I know a hell of a lot about PR, and this “education” concept, my friends, is a dead letter. If people don’t like highly technical positional battles, they’re not going to like them more after you talk down to them.
There are purists who will tell you that the NFL was better when the forward pass was only a tool of last resort. They will tell you that 7-3 and 3-0 field position wars were far purer and more interesting than today’s 28-21 shootouts. But if the NFL had listened to those voices, it would be far smaller and less successful than it is today. The NFL has consistently tweaked its rule-set to encourage what can only be described as a fan-friendly style of play, and its success can be largely attributed to that adaptability.
I honestly don’t know what those sorts of tweaks would look like in MMA. It’s my sense that the Pride rules and ring configuration was more balanced (in terms of putting submission guys and strikers on equal footing with wrestlers) than the UFC structure, but I could be way off. What I do think is that structural changes should be considered if the current structure overly favors safe, boring, positional wrestling.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on May 20, 2010 5:54 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Very well put...and a suggestion
You make an excellent point, purists among us be damned. The following solve the issue completely, nor should we be trying to. It does however increase the "watchability" of the fights which, like it or not, is hugely important for continued growth (forgive the partial repost).
1. Have a system of warnings and standups for lack of activity / positional improvement, including point deductions. For example, within each round, allow 2 warnings per occurance, maybe one at 30 seconds and a 2nd after only 15-20 seconds (and only if legitimate activity occured after the first warning). Now, maybe if this happens a second time within a round, it is one 15 second warning and then an automatic point deduction.
2. Change the compensation system such that finishes in whatever form (KO / TKO / submission) result in a considerably larger purse for the winner. Think Anderson would finish everyone if his pay depended on it. $400K for a win, $600 for a finish? Could still have KO / Submission / Fight of the night.
3. Consider implementing a yellow card system if this isn’t sufficient, although that might prove difficult.
by BigDNotDallas on May 20, 2010 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I like these.
Moreover, I think the point is not that anyone on this board has the definitive answer…or even that a definitive answer exists, but rather that we should be flexible about how we think about our still very young sport.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on May 20, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions
numbers
Like I said above if karate or any other art was in all of the high schools and colleges the way wrestling is and kids got to compete in jiu-jitsu with each other and have state champs etc from age 11 on up the way they do in wrestling then you would have a much bigger pool of jiu-jitsu fighters to draw from and the cream of the crop would go to the UFC and we would see a dramatic increase in jiu-jitsi based fighters. It is all numbers. More people in America at least wrestle than any other art because it is FREE in the school system. We are seeing the top wrestlers from a pool of a hundred thousand but when it coes to jiu-jitsu or muay thia maybe a pool of 30,000 of which 90% have had less than 3 years of it. Wrestlers get to start 5 days a week practices in every school in America from middle school on. You cannot ignore that fact. It is a numbers game not the art. Hence why almost all the top wrestlers in mma are Americans and the jits guys are from Brazil for the same reason.
It goes a lot farther back than that. Most wrestling start in elementary level in their local club. Some people who start later in either middle or high school go on to have succes but a good majority of kids wrestling since they were 6 or 7 all the way threw college. Adding to that kids are now cross training in mma at the high school and college level. We are just starting to get most of the young good wrestling in our country to train in mma.
If a fighter can not stop a take down then they should not be a MMA fighter. Take down D should be one of the first things a MMA fighter master if they want to be able to keep the fight on their feet. Even with good Take down D guys like GSP will still get a take down if they want to.
I say blame the guy who cant stop a take down or get off his back before you start blaming wrestling’s for dong what they are better at then the other guy.
by Darren Watkins on May 20, 2010 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The problem is that people cry too much. Was Mo/Mousasi the most exciting fight in the world? No, but Mo did what he wanted to, and did more than Mousasi, but it’s not the end of the world, he is not on Antonio McKee’s level.
And I still can’t believe that people are complaining about Jake shields. He mounted the #2 middleweight in the world 6 times in 4 rounds. If you think.
People are not going to learn to enjoy what King Mo did, but he happens so rarely at the big shows that it’s a waste of time to get upset about it.
As people have said, the problem is not with the wrestlers, it is with the rules and the judging. Knees on the ground would help, but that would be very hard. But the way it is right now, sitting in guard and striking is more beneficial than trying to advance position or throw up submission attempts that won’t work. The answer is not more stand ups.
Since the rules and judging are going to be hard to change, the best thing to do is learn to sprawl, or wait for the wrestlers to get better at submissions or off of their back so they are more willing to try for submissions or advancing positions.
“Maggie Hendricks, possibly one of the most knowledgeable wrestling fans writing about MMA today…”
Can you elaborate on this?
She has been following college wrestling for a long time and I think helped out with Missouri’s wrestling team.
by Darren Watkins on May 20, 2010 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't care if you guys dislike Antonio Mckee's style,
but I think it’s unfair that McKee isn’t in the big leagues even if he hasn’t lost a bout in YEARS, while not-so-talented lightweights who don’t even deserve to be in the UFC can get several bouts with the promotion. see: Dave Kaplan.
If he can get multiple TUF and UFC bouts while clearly not UFC-level, a guy with McKee’s skills should get a shot as well. They’ve been saying this is more sport than spectacle right?
Any sport driven by PPV buys and TV ratings is not more sport than spectacle.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on May 21, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Spectacle gets a bad rap
MMA is a spectator sport that is trying to grow its fanbase. Spectator sports need to appeal to spectators. Spectators like spectacles.
This doesn’t mean that MMA promotions should be chasing down every freak show and washed up steroid abuser who is willing to strap on gloves, but it does mean that promoters should be doing everything in their power to put on entertaining fights, featuring entertaining fighters. It would be one thing if the UFC were snubbing the best fighter in the world, but I have zero problem with them taking a pass on an older, slightly less talented Jon Fitch clone who would grind out unwatchable decisions over their more entertaining fighters.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on May 21, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
This. Jake Shields may have just killed MMA on free TV. I can’t blame the UFC for not wanting to endanger their bottom line with that.
by Tim the Enchanter on May 21, 2010 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions

by 


















