The WEC Illusion: Why Ben Henderson Doesn't Belong in a Real Main Event
Last weekend the promotion formerly known as the WEC co-main evented a $45 pay per view with a matchup between Ben Henderson and Donald Cerrone. Think about that for a second. It should boggle your mind. Yes, the two men went back and forth in a very competitive five round fight last year. There was an excellent chance that it could have been an excellent fight (it turned out to be a one-sided dud. Who can predict these things?) But the co-main of a PPV? MMA fans should, but seemingly don't, feel cheated. Henderson and Cerrone are prospects. And not particularly high level prospects.
They are the lightweight equivalents of Steve Cantwell, Brian Stann, and Carlos Condit. You remember those fine gentlemen right? These were Henderson's WEC counterparts at 170 and 205 pounds. They were all sold as "world" champions, just like Henderson. And then they went to the UFC and quickly faded from the scene. Condit, at one point, was considered a top-10 fighter based on his WEC pedigree. That illusion quickly disappeared as Condit fell back to the middle of the pack. Stann and Cantwell seem to racing each other out of the promotion all together. None of them seem like potential prospects any more. The WEC illusion has washed away. Or it should have.
You'd think the examples of Stann and Cantwell would demonstrate pretty clearly that success in the WEC is often illusory. Obviously, that lesson hasn't sunk in yet. Reporters continue to buy whatever Zuffa sells them. First Faber, Torres, and then Brown were sold as the unbeatable stud, the next pound for pound star. And based on what? Brown was a career long journeyman. Faber was a 135 pounder masquerading as a featherweight. Most of Torres' success came against unknowns in midwestern country bars. None of this seems to matter. Aldo, who has beaten Faber and Brown, is being sold as the best fighter in the world. Never mind that his most impressive win is over a fighter that Manny Gamburyan just ethered in seconds. The same Gamburyan that floundered in the UFC against middling competition.
Look no further than Bloody Elbow's definitive rankings to see the WEC Illusion in full effect. People Ben Henderson is ranked above in BE's rankings? Joe Stevenson, Nate Diaz, JZ Calvan, and a host of others. All predicated on a win over Jamie Varner (who no one has ever mistaken for a top 10 fighter) and a close decision win over Cerrone, a fighter whose resume is even sparser than Henderson's. The presentation of these fighters, portrayed as champions and placed high on the card, is all smoke and mirrors on Zuffa's part. They are selling you an inferior product, and not even at a discount price. I like Ben Henderson. He seems like a nice kid and it will be intriguing to see him develop. But that's exactly what he needs to do. Call me when he's beaten Evan Dunham. Call me when he's competitive with Jim Miller (a former IFL champion. Where is he on the top 10 lists? champion right?) But please don't call to tell me that he's in the main event of a show I'm supposed to take seriously as a world class exhibition of fighting. Prospects have their place: it's on the undercard. Fans deserve better.
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
217 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Raptor Hay-Seus

Walking the line between intelligence and ignorance since 1985
@deowade
by Damon O. on Apr 26, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
This Gif is so disturbing.
I don’t know where you got this from but it is creeping me out on so many levels. I am so worried about these kids. Where are they now? Are they OK? I am not feeling good. I am feeling sick to my stomach. Please make it stop!
"Stop smiling you are about to be punched in the face !"
I TOTALLY AGREE.
there is something highly disturbing about this gif and I dont like it one bit. It makes me feel like I am losing my soul.
by Opposites Attack on Apr 26, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree about Cerone
But I think that Ben has progressed a ton. He was a low level prospect when the WEC signed him, but at this point I think he could hang with the elite of the world. Maybe this is the reverse of all Japanese LW are elite, but I’d take him over everyone not named Penn or Florian or Maynard.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
This would be a great fight. As would Henderson/Edgar.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions
I think it’s crazy to even suggest Henderson/Edgar or Henderson/Melendez. He hasn’t fought anyone remotely on that level. Would he be favored over Joe Stevenson or Tyson Griffin?
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
I think he’s favored over Stevenson. Probably even bet against Griffin.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions
I think he could hang with any of the mid-level guys in the UFC. The guys who would give him trouble are the ones who have a huge wrestling advantage (Maynard) or great TDD and much better striking (Edgar, Penn, Florian). I think Bendo is perfectly capable of beating guys like Griffin, Guida, Stevenson, Fisher etc. Not sure if he would be a favorite, but he would most certainly be competitive.
Those would be awesome odds to make enormous sums of money on. Especially on Stevenson. The closest thing to Joe that he’s fought is Shane Roller, and Roller is about 4 levels below Stevenson.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions
I would take Griffin at even money all day long
watchkalibrun.com
by Zak Woods on Apr 26, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
People love to bag on Griffin. He’s always the deciding factor as to how middle-of-the-road a LW fighter is. “He couldn’t even beat Tyson Griffin” or ’Even Tyson Griffin would take him."
He looks better each time we see him, and he’s only lost to Sherk (back when Sherk still wrestled the hell out of you) and Edgar (the current f’ing champ, in what was one of the most exciting fights I can recall). Griffin is awesome.
Hey Pete
R.I.P.
by Grappo on Apr 26, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Exactly. I think Tyson would kick the crap out of Henderson.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, he was the BoxerShark for rounds 2-5. He tried wrestling Griffin in the first, but it wasn’t very effective.
I’d love to see a rematch. Tyson was steadily working his way up the title ladder until Sherk edged him out. A win over Sherk is still very quality, and I think the current Griffin takes him. Then after Sherk, he should get a shot to avenge his loss to Edgar… after BJ beats him :p
Hey Pete
R.I.P.
We then exist in a difficult universe, where Henderson doesn’t deserve to fight anyone because he’s unproven, and he’s unproven because he hasn’t fought anyone.
He’s fought the best people the WEC. I think his last five wins are about as good as they could have been.
I think he’s demonstrated a lot of skill, and some sloppiness. Enough to qualitatively guess at his caliber.
by dfmickley on Apr 26, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think that’s the case at all. Ben Henderson hasn’t even fought a good measuring stick, like Clay Guida or Mac Danzig. If he can beat someone like that rather than be imagined to beat someone like that, I think its a different story. Until then, he’s totally unproven at something akin to the UFC level. He shouldn’t even be ranked in the top 25.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
agree until you say top 25. i think it’s fair to put henderson in the top 25. i’d probably slot him around 15 right now i guess.
www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology
Until he can beat someone at the level of Mac Danzig, he shouldn’t be ranked above someone like that.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Ben Henderson hasn’t even fought a good measuring stick, like Clay Guida or Mac Danzig
Henderson would absolutely smother Danzig’s non-wrestling ass. It wouldn’t even be competitive.
He might. How about he actually beats someone at Danzig’s level first? I think that would be good.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, gotta add something else
The WEC card ended up being more enjoyable to watch that the strikeforce cbs card. That card had 5 top 10 people and and a prospect in Mo. All fights went to decision.
I think people aren’t angry about buying a card co-headlined by henderson/cerone because they’ve never been in a boring fight. I’d be more inclined to buy a Henderson headlined PPV than Anderson Silva because Ben always comes to fight, Anderson only fights when he feels someone is worthy.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
This is the difference between MMA fans and boxing fans. I thought the second Henderson-Cerrone fight was a boring fight. It wasn’t incredibly disappointing to you that this potential masterpiece of the mediocre was over before it started? I remember buying Tyson-Spinks on PPV and how angry everyone was after the fight. We had spent hard earned money on a blowout.
It’s also funny to be sold the idea that a decision is a bad thing. The fight everyone is hard selling off of this show went to a decision. Many of the best fights in boxing and MMA history went to decision. This critique has admittedly always baffled me. Sometimes a decision just means you saw an amazing back and forth fight. Sometime a quick finish means you were cheated from seeing that….
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I guess it brings up the greater question as to whether or not fans want to see mixed martial arts or if they want cagefighting.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Can't we do both?
I’m sure there are some fans just want blood and guts, and I’ve seen some say they prefer to see outstanding top control technique smother the opponent and take him out of his game. I like MMA because it is a combination of violence and technique.
I see Snowden’s point about wanting to watch a drawn out war, but part of the excitement is that fights can finish very fast, at any time. Any time, 1st round included. Unlike boxing, an MMA PPV is usually filled with fighters that we know, and usually has several that we care about to some extent. Who else fought on the Tyson Spinks card? Nobody probably cared even back on the day it happened.
Here you got Aldo v Faber to go 5 rounds, and another full-distance war from Shang Tsung and Garcia. I would have liked to see more Henderson v Cerrone, but if they’d gone the distance then I would have probably bitched that the judges got it wrong ;)
People are disappointed when there’s no finish, they complain about the judging, and now they’re supposed to be mad about a 1st round finish? Pretty soon we’ll be complaining about every fight except for highly technical 3 round slugfests between #1 vs #2 in the world. Criminey.
I consider myself a softcore fan.
Yes, this fight was anti-climatic but the first one was amazing and sold people on this fight. People didn’t expect a quick tap.
After two weeks of awful cards, people were excited because every fight was going to be exciting. I’d buy Cerone/Henderson 3/4/5. Like Garcie/Jung, just because they aren’t Aldo, doesn’t mean that next time they are on a card, I won’t buy it/watch it.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions
A boring fight?
Really? Anti-climatic as hell, sure, but boring?
If Derek Jeter clubbed a baby seal on earth day while wearing a mink coat and crocodile skin boots while burning tires on an iceberg, the reaction would be "Its OK Derek, you’re a Yankee." -First mammal to wear pants
Disappointing is probably a better word than “boring.”
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
yeah...
it had no time to be boring
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 26, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
That’s the problem with boxing though. You bought that because of Tyson Spinks, if you watched the whole card you probably didn’t know anyone on the undercard and would be hard pressed to see them fight again.
Even if you were the biggest Cerrone fan in the world and bought the card just to see him, yea, he got his ass kicked, but you got to see other good fights with people that you’ve heard of and people that you can actually become fans of.
I don’t think that most fans actually saw many fighters they were familiar with during the AVF1 card. That was kind of the issue, wasn’t it? To me, it made no sense to run this card as a PPV if there wasn’t an intention to build the WEC brand name. Why not just mix the lighter weight guys into the UFC PPVs if that is the case?
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t understand why this criticism persists at this stage of the game where the logistics just aren’t there. Mixing the lighter weight guys into the UFC PPV’s involves plenty of contractual issues, and there’s no reason not to believe Dana on the point about their contract with Versus and Spike. They’ve spent good money building the WEC by itself, so it’s not something they can throw away overnight. On top of that, the UFC would require a lot more card space to shove all the lighter weights into the UFC.
Perhaps the PPV was less about building the WEC brand so much as it was to build interest in the lower weights (hence the emphasis on Aldo and Faber specifically).
by David Castillo on Apr 26, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
No one knows precisely what the logistics are or that they are impossible to manage. Apparently it is not impossible to run a WEC show on Spike: This much is clear.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
They also manage to use the UFC brand name on those PPVs…
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
You’re right. The UFC could fold the WEC into the UFC overnight…good thing Zuffa is run by a group of Russians and t-shirt makers
by David Castillo on Apr 26, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah…you would be hard pressed to have ever seen Carl Williams, Trevor Berbick, Buster Douglas, and Razor Ruddock ever fight again if you were a boxing fan in 1988 watching the Tyson/Spinks undercard.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 26, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I dunno, I can’t remember that far back, but I can not remember ever caring about boxing undercards, which i used to watch all of when i was a kid.
Maybe that has something to do with your own personal emotional attachment to the sport? It could it be that you’re projecting your own parasocial relationship to MMA undercard fighters as having more value than they really hold rather than them really being better, you know.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions
so
what you’re doing is trying to argue both sides: Ben Henderson isn’t that good because his biggest wins before Saturday were a choke-out of Jamie Varner and a razor-thin decision vs. Cerrone?
but when Henderson goes out and utterly dominates Cerrone and finishes him in under two minutes, it’s disappointing?
Bendo did exactly what a champion should, IMO: he beat up and beat out the challenger in as dominant a fashion as possible. he showed that he’s improving with every bout, and that a challenger is going to have to bring his A game to beat him.
What more can you ask of the guy at this point in his career?
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I think his point is obvious. The justification is that while neither guy is great and potentially not even that good, at least they were exciting before. The rematch wasn’t exciting. It was never going to validate Ben Henderson as anything, so the least that could have come of it didn’t come to fruition.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions
The justification is that while neither guy is great and potentially not even that good
Quoted for utter stupidity.
Henderson is very obviously above “potentially not even that good”. He finished a quality, yet middling fighter in less than a round. How does this do anything except validate Henderson as an improving LW fighter?
The more I think about this, the less I understand about MMA fans. The card had 7 fighters ranked in the top 10, and delivered on plenty of very good fights (Jung/Garcia, Johnson/Pickett, Jurgensen/Banuelos), on top of some very good performances (Aldo, Pettis, and Benson in particular) involving prospects, champions, and gatekeepers, and we’re supposed to feel cheated?
Fuck that noise.
by David Castillo on Apr 26, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
We have no idea what Cerrone’s quality is. Middling is probably closer to the truth. We likely won’t know how he stacks up with UFC quality lightweights for sometime.
There’s nothing I can add to the discussion that hasn’t already been about it being an entertaining card versus being worthy PPV.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t have any issue with Henderson. He’s a likable guy and a good fighter. He’s just not a fighter that I should be asked to pay $45 to watch at this point in his career. Obviously his easy win over Cerrone isn’t a disappointment for him or hindering his development as a fighter. It was only a disappointment to fans expecting a back and forth battle that would steal the show.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
honestly
i’m a bit frustrated with you, because i really do feel like you’re trying to argue both sides here. which led to me being insulting down the thread. for which i apologize.
however, i feel like you’re generally saying that a WEC PPV featuring the promotion’s lightweight division isn’t compelling because the UFC already has a great lightweight division. my viewpoint on the whole thing is this: was the WEC PPV worth $45 with Ben Henderson in the co-main? Absolutely.
The entire card was entertaining. Hell’s bells, I even enjoyed the Alex Karalexis fight for what it was. Not a boring fight on the card.
Bring me an event like that — without one single stinker on the card, and I’ll open my wallet. Every. Time.
Oh, and Ben Henderson made the Cerrone fanboys shut it — showed Cowboy up and showed him the door. Which makes me a fan for life.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Cantwell/Stann fought at 205.
"Sometimes hype just ain't enough." - Jens Pulver on his win over BJ Penn
by lowellthehammer on Apr 26, 2010 10:25 AM EDT reply actions
The bottom line
is that we have to see him compete in the UFC to know for sure.
Exactly. But if we aren’t sure about a fighter, what is he doing in the co-main event of a show we are expected to pay $45 to watch?
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
You’ve got a point, Jonathan, but it’s only convincing to the hardcore fan universe.
Prestige is one qualification for a bout, but not the most important, and not even the most compelling. Why have Gatti/Ward 2?
And, as you know, MMA is even more capricious in its star-making than boxing – Jung came into the event an intriguing nobody, and emerged a cult icon. Action is marketable. Action sells. Cerrone/Henderson is a matchmaker’s best stab at recapturing lightning in a bottle. It didn’t play out that way, but nothing wrong with that.
And the card did have the WEC’s only representative of the truly elite – Mr. Aldo – and the best fights of any card this year Maybe ever. Hard for me to find an element of the card to be critical about, especially a rematch of 2009’s FOTY.
I think it’s interesting to debate whether “Action” sells. How many fights has Marcus Davis main evented? Chris Lytle? Jorge Gurgel “actioned” his way right out of the UFC. The biggest money draws in the UFC are all winners first and foremost.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Not winners – dramatic winners. Okami and Fitch win plenty.
I see your point, but I think it’s shaky ground to draw a parallel to the UFC’s completely stacked welterweight division. Henderson and Cerrone are at the top of their weight class, and deservedly so.
Maybe the question for your post is – do you want the WEC to be the WEC, or were you looking for a UFC ppv?
My point is that Henderson/Cerrone are NOT at the top of their weight class. They are mid-level prospects masquerading as champions.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
kind of like
you’re a mid-level blogger trying to stir crap and act like a real journalist?
i mean, these guys don’t come to your job and throw rocks at you while you’re mowing. jesus.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
i think Snowden's post
was uncalled for, and was insulting to the fighters.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't see it as insulting at all honestly
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 26, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
The post is controversial, and it will draw the ire of many fans of the WEC, Ben Henderson, or Donald Cerrone, but it isn’t insulting. I am a huge fan of the “Smooth” one, but Snowden has a point here. If you or anyone else liked the card, then that is great, but I am also sure that many here on BE are already fans of the WEC and know that it is action-packed, so they won’t feel cheated regardless of putting down $45.00. However, for those that aren’t so savvy with the WEC, in accordance with the article, they were tricked into putting down $45.00 into two fighters who are very good, but aren’t at the top of their weight class but were billed as being the top of their weight class.
they're the top of their weight class in the promotion
::shrugs:: that’s about all you can do.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
What is insulting? They are mid-level prospects and this is not for any sort of legitimate championship.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I think most people reading this understand I am not criticizing the fighters at all. I respect both, have interviewed both, and was entertained by their first fight. These guys put it on the line and I appreciate that. I just don’t think they are at the level where it is fair to ask fans to pay $45 to watch them.
I think you owe me an apology. We disagree without making it a personal issue.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
look up the thread
i do find your (original) post here insulting. have you ever referred to KOTC’s championships as a paper title? How about Strikeforce (wow, I’m tired. I totally typed Strokeforce, which would really be amusing now that I’m thinking about it) championships or champions as inferior?
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think KOTC’s champions are ready to support a $45, no. Is this a serious inquiry? Are you suggesting Quinn Mulhern and Dom O’Grady are the equivalent of UFC champions?
I think Strikeforce’s championships are company titles and for the most part the fighters are inferior to UFC champions in the same weight class. I wouldn’t pay $45 to watch Strikeforce either.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
you didn't answer the question
are they paper champions?
are Strikeforce’s champions (and by inference their fighters) inferior to the UFC’s champions and fighters?
you’re arguing that a Henderson-Cerrone rematch wasn’t worth the $45 price tag. fine, you can argue that. if you see little to no value in the WEC LW title, you can argue that.
but here’s the deal, and it’s one of the reasons i find your post insulting: Henderson is the promotion’s champion. he’s faced the best they had to offer, won an interim title and unified that with the “real” title. none of that equals a paper title or a paper champion. everything Henderson got, he earned in the cage.
the only paper champion/paper title i can think of right now in the sport is Alistair Overeem, who hasn’t defended his belt in about two years.
call me when that’s the case for Ben Henderson.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Think he pretty much implied that
I think Strikeforce’s championships are company titles and for the most part the fighters are inferior to UFC champions in the same weight class. I wouldn’t pay $45 to watch Strikeforce either.And sure Henderson is the champ, but so are the Dayton Flyers. But no one would put being the NIT champ on the same level as the NCAA champ.
by John Nash on Apr 26, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Fans don’t feel cheated because the event was incredibly entertaining and featured a ton of highly ranked fighters on the rest of the card (six top 10 and another five top 20 fighters according the BE rankings).
by Steve4192 on Apr 26, 2010 10:36 AM EDT reply actions 3 recs
Highly ranked fighters, but that is based on ignorance. That’s not an insult. We are all ignorant about the quality of fighters in these divisions because they are so new. What does it mean to be a top 10 featherweight when Mike Brown and Manny Gamburyan can claim that status?
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
By the same token, how can we tell those guys are no good just from having struggled in weight classes they’re too small for?
by JRN on Apr 26, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
They might be good – there’s a lot of good fighters. But it’s a stretch to call them elite or “P4P”.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Best information available.
Personally, I find it exciting to witness the development of a division as fighters sort out who is legit and who is not. Watching the FW & BW divisions develop is like re-living what we saw happen around 1999-2000 when all the UFC guys started making their way over to Pride and established a clear pecking order in the heavier weight divisions. That was one of my favorite times in the sport. I am thoroughly enjoying watching history be made in the WEC.
I am too. That’s not exactly the bone I am picking here. I love the WEC, I just don’t think they presented a real PPV level product.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Are you not entertained??

But in all seriousness, I understand where you’re coming from in regards to where some of these fighters are ranked. But I think people paid for this card not for the ranking of the fighters, but because of the potential for a lot of exciting fights.
by PM23 on Apr 26, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
To discredit Brown and Gamburyan because of past performences is ignorant...
Fighters can ALWAYS be improving, especially when fighting in a different weight class which is more suitable for them. Paul Daley lost to Nick Thompson just over a year ago, and now he’s a top 10 (according to BE) welterweight, Overeem was 21-6 at LHW and is now considered a top 10 HW, Deigo went from a good WW to an instant title contender at LW… the list goes on and on…
Prior to his losses to Gamburyan and Aldo, Brown hadn’t lost in 4 years, and his losses were to upper echelon fighters (Imanari, Franka, Lauzon, Genki Sudo).
by Fedorable on Apr 26, 2010 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You’d have a better case here if Cerrone/Henderson was the main and not the co-main. I don’t think anybody bought the PPV because they thought that fight was genuinely prestigious or important. They bought it for the actual main, and maybe secondarily because Cerrone/Henderson I was so entertaining.
It’s true that the top WEC lightweights are frequently over-ranked, though, certainly.
Never mind that his most impressive win is over a fighter that Manny Gamburyan just ethered in seconds. The same Gamburyan that floundered in the UFC against middling competition.
What are your thoughts on Michihiro Omigawa?
He also ‘floundered in the UFC against middling competition’, but people seem to have accepted him as a world class featherweight. Why does Omigawa get the benefit of the doubt but Gamburyan does not?
by Steve4192 on Apr 26, 2010 10:39 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Because, Steve, the actual degree to which fighters improve between fights is an extraordinarily difficult variable to measure, or even guess at. Who knows where their head’s at (is Mike Brown really a flash in the pan, or just affected by personal circumstance for his last two fights?) or if they even get to show their improvement. Who knows if in-camp improvement translates to in-ring performance.
It complicates arguments and makes things muddy.
I think that you are right, though, and holding fighters’ skills as static in time, for the sake of an argument, is risky business.
Who are the people accepting him as a world class featherweight? No one talks about him. He’s not even considered the best featherweight in Japan.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
He’s #6 in the BE rankings and ranked above anyone in WEC not named Aldo-Faber-Brown.
He’s obviously getting a lot of love from the sites included in the BE aggregate.
#9 according to Mr. Snowden just ahead of the journeyman, Mike Brown, but behind the 135 pounder masquerading as a featherweight, Urijah Faber.
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Apr 26, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Huh. Go figure; I guess the Hioki fight got people to forget what actually happened in the Sandro and Kanehara bouts. More to the point: I don’t think by not referencing Omigawa at all he’s stating that he’s a more legitimate featherweight than than Gamburyan. It does make 145 look like a refuge for mediocre lightweights. If Gamburyan beat Aldo next time out, what would that say about the lighter weight classes from a P4P stance?
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 27, 2010 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions
The difference is that Omigawa is not the same fighter who struggled in the UFC. He has improved tremendously and racked up an impressive list of scalps at 145 (Davis, Phan, Sandro, Hioki, Takaya, Miller)
Whereas Mike Brown has beaten scrubs like Jeff Curran, Leonard Garcia and Urijah Faber x2.
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Apr 26, 2010 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Hmm...
Ahem… Whereas Gamburyan has beaten scrubs like Leonard Garcia and Mike Brown. Better.
Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate
by Richard Wade on Apr 27, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs

Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Apr 27, 2010 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Just look at that pain and rage!
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Apr 27, 2010 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Doesn’t the name “Chael Sonnen” kind of kill your point here about success in the WEC being “illusory”? Condit’s still ranked # 12 on this very website, and dropped the closest of decisions to Martin Kampmann, a guy who was one win away from a title shot. Cerrone/Henderson/Stann/Cantwell? Okay. But don’t paint the entire WEC roster (or alumni) with the same brush here.
http://www.twitter.com/TB_Money
by Tim Burke on Apr 26, 2010 10:45 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
agreed that we need a dose of reality on where these guys stand. but to be fair, the card was almost entirely sold based on the main event, not on henderson-cerrone. and the UFC has the occasional lackluster co-main event also, such as daley-hazelett on 108. so i don’t think the WEC has done anything different from what any other promoter tries to do.
still, yeah, a lot of the WEC lightweights are artificially boosted because they are facing easier competition. i think the carlos condit analogy fits a guy like donald cerrone pretty well. ben henderson, however, is a pretty intriguing prospect and while it’s doubtful he’ll ever be UFC LW champion, i don’t think he’ll flame out. i think he does belong in the UFC much in the same way that daley or hazelett belong, and those guys got to co-main event billing also.
www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology
You are using Daley-Hazelett as an example, but it is kind of an outlier isn’t it? That card was widely considered one of the worst UFC cards ever and the fans spoke with their wallets. It’s not typical of a UFC co-main.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions
ok but even look at main event of ufc 109… couture vs coleman was sort of a rip off, convincing casual fans that these guys were both still at the top of their games.
point is, yes, henderson/cerrone is not really a title fight, therefore ppv buyer beware. i agree. but any other promoter would do the same thing in a heartbeat if they thought they could sell it.
www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology
Whether or not the WEC LW title is a paper belt or not, I will ALWAYS buy a PPV with Ben Henderson on it.
Why? Because he has shown me, in his last handful of fights, that he is an exciting fighter. Knocking him for his fight at “AldovsFaber 48” being boring is knocking a vital aspect of the MMA, and combat sports in general, game. Fights can end at any time.
I haven’t seen Ben main event any UFC cards, maybe I missed that PPV. Ben Henderson DOES deserve to be in a real WEC main event. How can you argue tthat?
by Applejack McNeil on Apr 26, 2010 11:17 AM EDT reply actions
Isn’t that just a matter of semantics though? I mean, this is priced like a UFC PPV, is put on by the same people as the UFC PPVs, the promotion is owned by the parent company of the UFC, the hype show was on the UFC’s cable partner, the announcers were the UFC’s team. Even the ring announcer was from the UFC. Its a UFC product that is decidedly second tier. I don’t think that’s an unfair criticism.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
i feel like WEC has little choice but to price their PPV at anything other than the same price as a UFC.
pricing it lower is admitting that the product is of lower quality or value. and i think clearly they are trying to make the opposite case – that at least the bantam and feather divisions are of equal value. and part of making that case is to price the event just like a UFC event.
www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology
by GregS123 on Apr 26, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Whether or not that helps in the perception of the WEC doesn’t make it beyond criticism.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Zuffa definitely used the UFC Hype Machine to bring in more buys but it’s ridiculous to think that Henderson will be anywhere near the main event of UFC 120 should the WEC’s LW division be absorbed. Maybe main eventing a Fight Night?
by Applejack McNeil on Apr 26, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
So he’s a guy who at best could headline a UFC Fight Night…..but he was in the #2 fight on a Zuffa owned/promoted PPV. The criticism looks generally on point to me then.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m not sure Henderson-Dunham main events a Fight Night. And that’s the kind of proving ground he needs.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
The UFC and WEC are two completely different beasts.
And while Saturday’s PPV blurred those lines, the fact of the matter is that in June, fighters will be back to getting 10,000 bonuses as per usual.
I agree with Snowden that ranking Henderson so highly is a bit incredulous but to say he doesn’t belong in a real main event when he is the champion of a national promotion is a bit absurd.
by Applejack McNeil on Apr 26, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions
So, you believe it is appropriate to feature prospects on a $45 PPV in a prime spot on the card because one has a paper title? When people inside the company don’t believe either could defeat even an average UFC fighter in the weight class?
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes. I have no problem paying $45 for a WEC PPV because they very rarely let me down. And if not Ben Henderson in the co-main event slot, then who?
by Applejack McNeil on Apr 26, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
right there
paper title. bam. insult.
Henderson won the promotion’s interim title by defeating Donald Cerrone in their first match.
he then became their undisputed champ by defeating Jamie Varner. and silenced his doubters by soundly dispatching Cerrone in their rematch.
that’s not a paper champion. that’s a guy who has worked hard through his own sweat, blood and tears to earn his championship. whether you value that title or not is irrelevant. he’s not a paper champion.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions
The problem is that the promotion’s title doesn’t mean anything. It has no intrinsic value. That’s why its a paper title.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
no
a belt that is fought for, that is won and lost in a cage or a ring isn’t a paper title.
you can say “i see no value in that belt” and that’s fine. but that’s a different argument.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
There are a million belts in MMA. I saw five in a strip mall window yesterday on a baked goods run. The vast majority of them are worth squat. The WEC title is among them. It signifies nothing about Henderson’s class at the world level.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
other than
he’s champion in a Zuffa-owned promotion that broadcasts nationally and now on pay-per-view. you definitely gotta think that’s valuable.
i’m not saying Henderson should necessarily be ranked even in the top 10. but he’s not the guy selling you twinkies down at the neighborhood quickmart, either.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Its a good promotional tool for Henderson and obviously you think it means something. I don’t. The lightweight world champion is Frankie Edgar. Everyone else is a pretender. Some pretenders are better than others based on the kind of guys beaten. Henderson by that criteria isn’t even the best pretender.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with this. Edgar is the world champion and it is embarrassing for Mike Goldberg to have to call anyone else the world lightweight champion in the Octagon. Henderson has probably the fourth most prestigious lightweight title depending on how you feel about Maximo Blanco.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions
there was a time
when the IBF boxing title was considered irrelevant, too. well, not irrelevant, but a distant third title in comparison to the WBA, WBC (if i recall correctly) titles. still doesn’t mean it was value-less.
of course now boxing is what boxing has become, so … i had a point and it petered out on me. i need some sleep.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
The IBF was legitimized by the guys who held its titles. Same with the WBO. When world class fighters and recognized world champions came to hold those belts, the belts inherited value. In this case, Henderson basically holds the equivalent of the WBF, NABO, USNBC, or IBA boxing title belt.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
yes
but for both IBF and WBO it took time. something that some folks seem not to be willing to give to WEC.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions
The IBF is an independent sanctioning body. The WEC is an MMA promotion most people want folded into the UFC. Its apples and oranges on that level, but the meaning of their belts are generally equal.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions
If I recall correctly
the WBO became “relevant” because Mike Tyson lost to Lamon Brester.
If an old, ineffective fighter losing to a no-name non-prospect is all it takes, other sanctioning bodies should follow that model.
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
actually
and i hate to admit this, but i’d be using the same argument if Cerrone won Saturday. i’m not arguing that the WEC title is as valuable as the UFC title. it’s not. however, it’s also not one of the belts on display at your local mcdojo, either.
the term “paper title” or “paper champion” is demeaning to guys who actually fight in the cage.
now, if you want to use it in reference to the SF heavyweight champ, be my guest.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions
But the SF HW title is a paper title
You could argue because it is not the UFC title, but more importantly because Fedor is now (maybe?) fighting in Strikeforce. it’s hard to claim to be the champ when the #1 HW of all time is fighting in your promotion.
nah
i argue that you can use the term paper champ because Overeem hasn’t fought in SF in two years or so. if you don’t defend your title, then yes — paper champ/title.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Lots of guys fight in the cage for a billion promotions and they all have “world titles”. There are no specific standards as to how those belts are maintained either. There are no bylaws.
The SF HW title is a paper belt. So is the 205lb, 185lb, 170lb, and 155lb titles. They are all company titles with no intrinsic value. None of those guys has proven themselves to be the top fighter in the world as has been the case with most of the UFC belts.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
hey
the UFC belts are company belts as well. that’s where your “intrinsic value” argument breaks down.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
They are. But the fighters import value. GSP is unquestionably the top welterweight in the world, ergo, the UFC welterweight title is meaningful. Even looking at the one UFC paper title (Lesnar’s), it has has more value than Henderson’s LW belt. Better level of competition, higher profile, and so on.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions
well, we think it’s higher level of competition. but it’s only competition within that one promotion.
kind of like Strikeforce.
kind of like the WEC.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
If you want to contend that the WEC is at the same level as the UFC, go right ahead. Make that claim. I have no idea how you could defend it without basically admitting that you’re not perceiving MMA as a sport.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions
i'm not saying it is
i’m saying it’s a different promotion with its own right to crown its own championship in the weight classes it sees fit.
period. end of story.
by bobthewriter on Apr 26, 2010 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions
We’re going in circles. Basically, the bottom line is that you don’t care if Ben Henderson would get his leg torn off by Rich Clementi should they fight; he’s exciting and you’d pay to see him and Cerrone wail at each other no matter how good or bad he really is. I think nottheface said it well a few hours ago. Nothing to add.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions
If only the very best in the world got an award for anything, then there would be no point for high school degrees, or even college degrees. There’s the Nobel Prize in Chemistry or nothing at all.
If only the very best belt in the world is recognized, perhaps the same should be said for fighters. Forget top-tens, I got my five best fighters in the world: Fedor, Lyoto, Anderson, GSP, and BJ.
I agree with the complaint about calling any belt a “world title.” It really is pretty meaningless in most sports (except the big international world championships of soccer and basketball, though these are usually competitions among nations, not individuals…I’m getting derailed.).
@castleeb – in response to your first paragraph, there can be all kinds of rewards, but one need not call them “world titles.”
Use all ten points.
Its the same picture with a nicer frame. Why separate the two’s PPV product when Zuffa themselves do not?
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
The point about Henderson is spot on, with the exception of comparing him to Stann and Cantwell (two guys whose quality was measured against guys like Doug friggin’ Marshall). Benson’s a quality fighter, but certainly not someone who should be ranked top 10.
The rest of Snowden’s post lacks context
Faber and Torres were the best of the bunch in divisions that were just finding their legs in America. For Torres, he had legitimacy because Mizugaki and Maeda were both ranked at the time of fighting him, so it’s not like he owed his ranking to “mere publicity” (although having him in the P4P lists was certainly ridiculous). Faber’s rank was always shaky, but this was no different than for another “icon of the overrated” in Kid Yamamoto. So what do we say about the rest of the world’s FW’s? The situation is similar to the LHW split back in the Pride/UFC era where everyone bitched about who was better: Chuck or Wand.
Hindsight, 20/20, and all that. This kind of hindsight criticism always slides on a slippery slope, and we could just as easily apply it to fighters like Mousasi, Lawal, Jones, Hioki, Aoki, Alvarez (getting beat by Aoki in the span of a minute doesn’t look so good now does it?), etc. Until these divisions (just talking about FW and BW here) have more time to grow and interact, it’s kind of dumb to sit here and question the quality with definitive statements.
Aside from which, the swing can be just as telling as the pitch. If you’re gonna sit here, and question Aldo’s status, that’s your choice. But if you’re gonna sit here and question Aldo’s ability as if his precision, patience, and overall abilities both on the feet and on the ground aren’t “world class” then I don’t what to tell you. That might not have been your point, but with your mountain of generalizations, it’s hard to tell.
Also, it’s not like co main events have some kind of rich history in MMA. Off the top of my head, and with a little help from fight finder, if in we include Dream, Strikeforce, UFC, etc. we’ve got: Aoki vs. Hirota/Shaolin/Hansen (none of these guys are currently ranked at LW except for Hirota who is as questionable as Benson), Mir/Carwin, Wand/Bisping, Marquardt/Sonnen, Hazelett/Daley, Mir/Kongo, Koscheck/Johnson, Swick/Hardy, Shields/Miller (if Miller was ranked, it was just as questionable as Bendo’s), Arlovski/Rogers…
Some quality fights, but it’s not like they exist on a different planet than Henderson/Cerrone.
by David Castillo on Apr 26, 2010 11:19 AM EDT reply actions
Frank Mir and Wanderlei Silva, two legends in the sport and former world champions, don’t exist on a different plane than a guy whose bets win is over Jamie Varner? I can’t agree with that.
Dream and Strikeforce are both free television events. I don’t think that is a fair comparison. I have no problem with Henderson-Cerrone in that position on a free card.
The others are cherry picked from the UFC during a tumultuous period and were pretty widely regarded as sub par.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Cherry picked? The point was that in general, co main events don’t have a rich history in MMA, and they don’t. If we go back in time I’m sure we’ll find above average co main events to be the exception rather than the rule (even Affliction with its barrels of cash to waste on total jobbers set up Yvel/Barnett as if that even qualified as an appetizer). Wand was 1-5 going into that fight with Bisping. So no, I don’t consider that some kind of grand canyon like gap between a passed his prime fighter versus a MW gatekeeper and two developing, exciting LW’s. Mir, I think most will agree is someone likely to be destined as a HW gatekeeper. His weakness of folding under pressure will always follow him, no matter how much he improves.
I don’t disagree with you on principle when it comes to Henderson but I just happen to think you’re overstating the issue as broad-brush thinking on top of ignoring context, especially when it comes to WEC’s BW and FW divisions.
by David Castillo on Apr 26, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
I think if you go back and look at the bulk of UFC PPVs you’ll see title fights and top flight guys in the co-main events. More recently, sure, they have struggled to put cards together.
I understand the context of the FW and BW divisions. I’ve talked at length with the people guiding these divisions. Even they would agree that saying the show had “7 top 10 fighters” is illusory. No one knows yet how good the fighters are in these divisions. I was told in two years we’d have a good idea of how things stand.
I like the WEC. I think it is fun to watch it play out. I also think they need something beyond the typical Versus card to really make it on PPV. And this could have easily been a VS card.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Even they would agree that saying the show had "7 top 10 fighters" is illusory. No one knows yet how good the fighters are in these divisions
In what way are those rankings “illusory”? If no one knows yet how good these fighters are, then why make the assumption that these guys are not “high level prospects”?
I don’t think you understand the context of the FW and BW divisions at all if you’re comparing those two to Henderson’s LW title. 155 in the WEC exists in a small pool outside of more historical, established divisions. 145 and 135 in the WEC do not.
by David Castillo on Apr 27, 2010 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions
You’re arguing a point for me that I’m not. I know that Zuffa is trying to corner the market on top FWs and BWs in order to find the best fighters in those divisions. I understand very clearly that they aren’t the same as the LW division, which is exactly why I wrote this article in the first place. At FW and BW they have the world’s bets fighters, they just aren’t sure which of them are the best yet. At LW they have the scraps.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 27, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions
buying a ben henderson fight is like watchin a boise state football game
u could argue forever whether or not they deserve to be in the top 10 but god dammit they’re exciting to watch
All I’ve got to say is that I had a lot more fun watching WEC 48 than I have watching any other card in AGES. I cannot remember a card that was that much fun. In fact, the WEC probably has the most fun cards of any promotion going. I gladly paid for it, I’ll be buying the next one too. Sure, the lw division is not the most talented one on earth, but they put on good fights anyway. And every promotion claims their champions are world champs. That’s just standard puffery. I’m not getting conned, because I know what it is and I’m glad to buy it. If anything, I wish the UFC’s average card was as much fun to watch as even the average WEC card.
"an excellent example of why most MMA "journalism" is a joke. Pseudonyms like "toxic" and shitty writing like that dopey article"--- Joe Rogan.
“I’m not getting conned, because I know what it is and I’m glad to buy it.”
That is probably true for you. But they went to outrageous lengths to try and fool many fans into thinking they were buying a UFC event. That’s a subject for another post, one that has probably already been made here, there, and everywhere.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
ok but were any of the fans who bought it upset?
name me the last WEC card that sucked
I guess that depends on what we mma fans are looking for. If it is, as some say, divisional relevance and truly trying to determine who is the best, than maybe we are getting suckered, because very little has been done to suss out where these fighters actually reside in their divisions (although I think we are in the process of making gigantic leaps forward in this endeavor). But if we are looking for great entertainment and “fun” fights than this was the card for us. For most of us I think it was the latter, which illustrates the fact that most fans of mma are former prowrestling fans and not boxing fans.
by John Nash on Apr 26, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Do you guys think that part of the appeal of the WEC is that the guys aren’t as established yet so they fight with a little more recklessness?
Are they sloppy because they have much less skills? or because they have much less to lose? I’m just reminded of many recent fights where high-level guys have fought cautiously and have drawn criticism for being boring.
I might draw a college/pro basketball analogy here. I myself prefer the higher skill level of the NBA, but a lot of people love the excitement of the college guys.
Use all ten points.
If the line of argument is that all decent fighters outside the UFC are overrated because they don’t fight the elite level of competiton the UFC has… I can buy that. I’m not sure why Henderson gets singled out when guys like Alverez, Aoki, and Melendez face second-tier competition at the very best and yet are considered elite fighters in the weight class.
Getting bent out of shape over a fight promoter lying is like getting upset that a hooker won't kiss you. It betrays a deep lack of understanding of the nature of the profession.
by Stanlee on Apr 26, 2010 1:21 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
That’s a terrible comparison because those guys are facing top tier fighters. Alvarez has faced the current #2, #6, and #18, Aoki has faced the current #3, #8, #12, #18, #19, and will be facing the #6 in July. Melendez has fought the #2, #6, #18, and #22 ranked fighters. And Henderson has fought…?
I think the argument is that people feel that just because they fight in Japan they get a pass as fighting elite competition. But when those fighters come to the US they get dominated, therefore you have to overrate them. Someone like Henderson is now facing the same problem as he’s faced everyone in the WEC who don’t get considered in the rankings because they aren’t fighting in Japan/UFC.
Could the rankings be correct and Henderson be completely outclassed if he fought any of the elite? Possibly, but they also could be incorrect and he could legitimately be a top 10 fighter who just faced two top15 esq fighters who just weren’t considered.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Henderson actually has to fight someone verifiably verging on the elite before he should be bestowed such status. Therein lies the problem. We can look at the guys outside the UFC and in it and say how they do against world class opposition because we have a billion tiers of fighters from journeymen to the absolute best to compare to. There are no such guys in the WEC. Even having someone like Rich Clementi in the WEC would help to establish who belongs, but they’ll never bring someone like that in.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions
But thats my point, people automatically rank fighters in Dream because those fighters are elite. But when Aoki gets beat by Melendez people are starting to say we overrated the #2 LW? Then so are the rest of his wins IE Eddie Alverez and JZ and Kawajiri.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I get what you’re saying. I’m just saying that those guys have fought journeymen and gatekeepers who are verifiably competitive at the elite (UFC?) level based on results. There is no such fighter who provides that “test” in the WEC’s lightweight division.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Well Varner fought in the UFC
and went 1-1. His loss was via armbar to Franca. He wasn’t completely outclassed either.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
What does that really mean though? Franca is out of the UFC now and retired. I mean, that’s pretty much the limit of the WEC’s LW experience at the upper echelons.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Franca has some pretty awesome wins. I’m doing the exact same thing you’re doing at this point. You’re discounting wins of WEC fighters and I’m discounting wins of DREAM fighters. I’m not changing your mind and you won’t change mine. Let’s just agree to disagree at this point.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m discounting anything. Right now, the best indicator of success at a world class level is Varner…who lost to Franca, who since suffered a bunch of losses, got popped for steroids, and has retired from MMA competition. I think its an inadequate sample size to determine what class these guys really are. Varner’s performances do nothing to really bolster that.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 26, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
But Aoki didn’t come to the US and get dominated by a UFC fighter, he got dominated by Melendez who made a name for himself beating fighters in Japan. I am not familiar with any LW fighters that came over from Japan to the UFC only to be exposed. Gomi, Aurello, Uno, etc had all been “exposed” before they set foot in the Octagon.
All you can ask a guy to do is beat the people put in front of him. Can you blame him for not having top level competition in his organization? Sure. But that criticism can be leveled at anyone outside the UFC and quite a few people hanging around the UFC being protected from tougher fights.
I mentioned Aoki, Alverez, and Melendez as examples partly rhetorically. I think any of the 3 would be manhandled by the elite of the UFC and are generally overrated, but I don’t think that’s a good reason to say “Oh they shouldn’t headline PPV cards! You guys are idiots!”
Getting bent out of shape over a fight promoter lying is like getting upset that a hooker won't kiss you. It betrays a deep lack of understanding of the nature of the profession.
To me all this really does is reiterate my thoughts that the WEC has no business having a lightweight division. It doesn’t make sense having fringe top fifteen ranked fighters on the same level as legitimate number one ranked fighters. That’s as far as I will agree with you. In the UFC Donald Cerrone would have about as much success as Mac Danzig. Its crazy to write off the WEC’s featherweight division because some of the top fighters were unsuccessful earlier in their careers at higher weights. That’s like saying the UFC lightweight division is poor because BJ has lost twice to GSP. Its just not a statement you can make. Comparing weight classes is always a bit fishy. All we really know is those are the best feather and bantamweight fighters in the world, and the put on a hell of a show. Get the lightweights out of there, maybe start a flyweight division.
by Neil Manich on Apr 26, 2010 1:30 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I think it would be interesting to look through post history of people in here
and see how many have devalued Strikeforce titles as meaningless. Because Aoki vs. Melendez is about 20x more relevant than Bendo vs. anybody in the WEC. So was Hendo vs. Shields. Hell, so is Overeem vs. Rogers. And none of those belts mean much to me, but at least involve top 5-10 fighters.
WEC LW belt means nothing and I think it makes their FW and BW titles look less important.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
I agree that the WEC LW belt is worthless but I also think that all other LW belts are worthless besides the UFC. All belts are worthless except for the UFCs and WEC FW and BW belts.
I think the problem is people are now overrating Ben Henderson just as they have Japanese competition. You look at the and you have Hirota at #12 when in reality, he hasn’t really faced top flight competition besides getting police locked by Aoki. Gomi is still #13. Sotiroupouolos is #15 when he has been on a tear. Meanwhile Kawajiri and Alverez are in the top 10 and in my opinion are severely overrated. It’s really an opinion thing, but I can see where people are coming from.
Support me in my campaign for Absolute Banning Power for Bloody Elbow
by Matthew Roth on Apr 26, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
To be honest...
..I misread the title of this post. I thought it said “Why Dan Henderson Doesn’t Belong in a Real Main Event”
I clicked on it intending to say “damn right.”
WEC lightweights are in a holding pattern, they’re being used as a UFC feeder league, but that shouldn’t take away from the rest of the WEC lineup, which is solidly awesometimes.
http://www.vancouversun.com/mma
I'm reading this article, and I'm trying to figure out how the argument isn't really "the WEC shouldn't do PPV"
You have a promotion, your fighters fight each other, you get the most successful and exciting guys and put them at the top of your card. Then you take this card, you market it, and people pay you money to watch it.
I really don’t think this is uncovering any great marketing conspiracy on the part of the WEC, or Zuffa, or even shedding light on something “wrong.”
The WEC didn’t hold back some better fighters they have in their back pocket, this was for the title in their best and possibly second-best division, with the biggest marquee names in the WEC. What else are they supposed to do? Borrow BJ Penn and Frankie Edgar?
I'll argue against myself til somebody gets here
On one hand: The WEC’s 135 and 145 divisions are arguably “world titles” while 155 is a betamax world championship. Therefore it is valid for the WEC to market a PPV card headlined by a Featherweight and Bantamweight.
On the other hand: I would have been LESS likely to but this card by far if the co-headliner was Benavidez vs. Cruz, because I don’t care about either of those fighters and because Benavidez’ ginormous noggin makes me feel like I’m watching a child participate in cage fighting.
Also on the other hand: If we concern ourselves with how other organizations trade up to the UFC, we will frequently find ourselves disappointed. There’s a dearth of MMAth to compare Ben Henderson, but if we apply the warped and context-deaf lens of Fightfinder to the “Real Main Event” at 145 we can conclude that as big as the 10-lb. difference is between 155 and 145, I can use “common opponents” to claim that the WEC, premier Featherweight strap in MMA, is a shelter for undersized and less-robust 155ers anyway.:*
- Tyson Griffin, labeled as middling by many in this thread, owns the sole pre-WEC defeat of Urijah Faber.
- He also MMAths all over Mike Thomas Brown by having a dominant stoppage over Hermes Franca, who stopped MTB. (To keep pounding on MTB, as a lightweight we can place him somewhere between Matt Wiman and Corey Hill for having lost to TUF5 semifinalists Joe Lauzon AND Manny G).
- From there, because I’m holding the WEC to a bigger global picture than the fights it’s able to put on form its own stable, the Featherweight belt is a wash, too.— We all know Frankie Fuckin’ Edgar is the TRUE Featherweight champion of the world— he’s the right size for 145, he may not be in the WEC but he beat Tyson “the measuring stick” Griffin, he’s a champ in the UFC @155, and I’ve chosen to let his existence out there in the world spoil the excitement for me of a great matchup cobbled together within the smaller pond of World Extreme Cagefighting (or Urijah vs Aldo Fighting Championships, whatever they called it). So, that belt’s basically a sham until he gets there.*
* I’m not actually advocating this, but it’s where we go when we start letting a theoretical “inter-divisional objectivity” stop us from enjoying great, well-matched fights.
Ben Henderson belongs in a “real” Main Event if people are willing to pay to see him or go out of their way to watch him on Versus. It has to do with being a “draw.” If the illusion of relevancy exists for enough people, it doesn’t matter if it’s just an illusion, and that some people consider him worthless. Kimbo Slice was a huge draw until he got knocked out in 14 seconds. Also, one noticeable omission from the article was that Chael Sonnen also came to the UFC via the WEC, and now he’s in a MW Title match. Not that he’s likely to win, but Chael Sonnen has a legit claim as the #2 fighter in the world now. Henderson is a lot younger (26) than Sonnen was in his last WEC fight (31 at the time, now 33). It’s entirely plausible that if Zuffa folded their LW division into the UFC that one of them would become a title contender there.
That being said, the WEC really needs to start a Flyweight division, because yeah, the LW division isn’t terribly credible and I’d like to see some world class Flyweights already. No one even knows who the world’s best Flyweights really are because they’re either fighting at Bantamweight in the WEC or they’re getting a very irregular schedule in Shooto, or they’re somewhere else, and just haven’t been tested in a major promotion. That needs to end.
Jonathan,
I certainly see where you are coming from, since Zuffa puts on such highly ranked main events for the UFC. Aside from the fact that I do not feel cheated because I found all these match ups interesting and exciting, my only gripe is the fact that you hold the WEC to the same standard as the UFC, when, it would be impossible for them to put on a show of that caliber.
SF put on a very solid show in terms of relevant fighters recently, but you could hardly say all their shows are top to bottom jaw droppingly amazing. Keep in mind, this is easily the number two organization in the United States.
I think your bar may be too high.
The bar for PPV is very high. It’s a one promotion game right now and if the show doesn’t match up well with UFC events, it’s going to be hard to convince people to buy them.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
zuffa was only hoping for 200k buys anyways
im willing to bet they hit that
by Richard Doughty on Apr 26, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Zuffa would be jumping for joy with 100,000 buys. No one was expecting 200,000.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Wowwww
I agree with somethings in this article. But the bit about fighter being “sold as champions” to us the public is absurd.
We were “sold” that faber was a dominant champ? I don’t think so, go back 3 years and he looked unstoppable.
But saying this only happened in the WEC is ludacris as well. Remember the Machida era?
But you believe that ben henderson is the brian stann of his weight division without even seeing him fight in the UFC, you have him written off as not belonging in a real main event. If Henderson, the WEC’s champ, were to battle Frank Edgar, the UFC’s champ.
I would bet on henderson winning the decision via his wrestling.
Machida is a very good fighter
and maybe able to prove he still is champ after his rematch with rua.
i some what agree with what jon is saying
but only about the light weight fighters of the wec
the feather weight and bantam weights are the best in the world
but you could say this about any promotion
strikeforce has maybe 10 fighters worth while and of them maybe 2 would have a chance to be champs in the ufc at this point (fedor and shields )
dream and senguko have a handful of fighters who would be mid tier in the ufc
i realize these other promotions arnt doing ppv
but is 50 bucks that much when you split it between 5 friends
by Richard Doughty on Apr 26, 2010 4:44 PM EDT reply actions
Kind of a weird article. Not sure that I think Ben isn’t good or doesn’t deserve to be on the main card for WEC, but I do find it odd that Zuffa has an overlapping weight class competing with the UFC weight class. I know Dana mentioned eventually combining them; which I’d like to see (heck, I’d like to see all of WEC in the UFC) I do agree with some of the points though that Henderson should be ranked below many of the top UFC LWs
My blah blah blah
My photography site
"expect us to take you seriously or think you’re even remotely intelligent?" - Luke Thomas
Everybody sucks, nobody’e ever beat anybody wakka wakka wakka.
Keep Firing, Assholes!
The world on a string doesn't mean a thing.
It's only real in the way that I feel from day to day.
by Ubernoober on Apr 26, 2010 6:15 PM EDT reply actions 5 recs
I like Henderson and I like Cerrone
I would personally pay (if that was the only way to see it) to see either one of those fighters fight again. They’re both entertaining, talented fighters. I don’t believe either one is the best out there, but they’re both extremely talented and entertaining and deserve proper credit.
Since Condit came to the UFC, he has gone 1-1 and is ranked 12th in the world. You lost me when you tried to use him as an example of a top WEC guy that failed in the UFC.
You’re right that I was unfairly projecting future losses. It is too early to call. I do think Condit will have a heap of trouble in a wrestler-heavy division. I really enjoy watching him fight though.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Let me explain the concept of rankings to you
It means that as a fighter, you are considered one of the very best fighters at your weight class. All the Manny & Mike Brown hate is undeserved; the premise behind them is that they didn’t perform well at Lightweight- well guess what: that’s not their optimal weight class! BJ Penn (although inconsistent) is a badass dude, and an all time great, and he looked like ABSOLUTE GARBAGE at 170 against GSP their 2’nd time out. Fighters cannot be lambasted and judged harshly for poor performance outside of their natural weight class, it’s just not fair.
Personally, I don’t feel ignorant when I say that Jose Aldo is one of the best fighters in the world because I have eyes. I understand quite a bit about the technical aspects of the game, and so when a guy like Jose Aldo goes out there, displays excellent footwork & head movement, pinpoint accuracy coupled with flawless timing and crippling power, and absolutely shitkicks a very good fighter in Urijah Faber, it’s a thing to behold.
When I see a guy like Bendo quickly dominate a very tough & skilled fighter in Cowboy Cerrone, and show excellence in all areas of the game (transitioning, clinch/ cage control, good GnP, and then the ability to execute and finish submissions) like he did, then I think to myself “Ok, this is a guy who could be considered as a top 10 fighter”.
Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"
Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A
Not that I disagree Miller would trounce Benderson (he would) but he wasn’t the IFL Champ. He was in talks to fight Schulz for the strap (and would have been a heavy favorite to win and become champ) when the promotion folded. Dan, on the other hand, was the Middleweight Champ, which may be where the confusion comes from.
Again, though, Benderson wouldn’t crack the top-10 of UFC lightweights.
Just Blog Guy - http://JustBlogGuy.wordpress.com/
Well
I hope you didn’t order the PPV. You didn’t deserve to watch it.
Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"
Well
Who’s to say Hendo and Cerrone aren’t less Stann and Cantwell and more Chael Sonnen..?
The fact is, we don’t know until they fight some UFC LWs. For all you know, Bendo could rip through all the wrestleboxers (Sherk, Griffin, Guida). Cerrone could sub them all. Or they might fade.
We just don’t know yet.
This is right. That’s why they are prospects. I don’t deny Henderson might go on to a glorious career. I just don’t think he’s ready to co-main event of a PPV right now.
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 26, 2010 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Here's the question
Who headlines the PPV then? Bendo is one of the WEC’s best fighters, their LW champ, and is always exciting. So what exactly is wrong with him headlining a WEC PPV? King of the Cage has PPV’s for god’s sake, their Japan card was headlined by Boku/ Hervey and Mamoru/ Frank Baca (who?). Obviously the WEC doesn’t have the brand power of the UFC, but Henderson/ Cerrone was most definitely the 2’nd most important fight on the card, promotion wise. Obviously Gamburyan and MTB are ranked higher at FW than Bendo and Cowboy are at LW, but they weren’t fighting for a title.
Would he co- main event a UFC PPV right now? There’s no way in hell. But the UFC does not = the WEC
Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"
Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A
by ElliotMatheny on Apr 26, 2010 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Exactly. Pay-per-view isn’t this idyllic thing that every promotion must strive for once they’ve reached the awesomest and most relevant roster they have. It’s an avenue in which a promotion can make money by trying to sell what they have to the public.
Ben Henderson is the champion of that organization’s lightweight division, fighting the no.1 contender of their division which is a rematch of the last year’s fight of the year. Henderson is also a prospect, but no putting him on the pay-per-view as a draw because he is a prospect and not a top ten lightweight is just silly.
What’s the alternative? Not show any fights from the WEC lighweight division because there are better divisions out there? If that happened, there’d be 50,000 articles about how the WEC is dying and inferior and they disrespect their fighters wakka wakka wakka.
Not that I condone facism or any ism for that matter. Isms are in my opinion, not good. A person shouldn't believe in an ism, he should believe in himself.
I quote John Lennon, "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me". Good point there, after all he was the walrus. I could be the walrus. Wouldn't change the fact I have to bum rides off of people.
by Sam Cupitt on Apr 27, 2010 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think anyone takes the WEC’s long term health seriously to begin with, including Zuffa. The argument he’s putting out there is pretty clear: Putting notable UFC fighters in a co-headlining position rather than Henderson/Cerrone (which doesn’t mean necessarily removing it from the card) would have made the event a much closer equivalent to a UFC PPV in terms of overall strength of card and even sold a few more PPVs.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 27, 2010 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions
No one is arguing the fight shouldn’t have been on the card. It’s the placement of a fight between prospects in the semi-main position that is questionable. If they are able to sell this to fans as a legitimate PPV headliner, I feel bad for the fighters down the road. It will be a clear sign that only the very top guys need to be paid at a respectable level. They can literally sell anything else in the other slots as long as it’s “exciting.”
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 27, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m not entirely sure I’m getting your point.
Although Henderson is a prospect he’s the still the champion of the WEC’s lightweight division. Like I said earlier, PPV isn’t this idyllic thing that has to feature these pure match-ups. If you are buying a WEC PPV you are paying to see the WEC which includes a lightweight division that has crowned Ben Henderson its champion. By rights a WEC lightweight championship bout is very much worthy of being a semi-main event of a WEC PPV.
Not that I condone facism or any ism for that matter. Isms are in my opinion, not good. A person shouldn't believe in an ism, he should believe in himself.
I quote John Lennon, "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me". Good point there, after all he was the walrus. I could be the walrus. Wouldn't change the fact I have to bum rides off of people.
“WEC PPV” is irrelevant, clearly so because the promoter didn’t even draw that distinction. It is a fight card that doesn’t exist in a WEC vacuum. If you charge $45 for a card, it should include top fighters in relevant fights.
This is a side point, but a pressing one. Once promoters learn that they can sell shows with prospects and non-elite fighters, do you really think they are going to break the bank to pay these guys? Why should they pay a livable wage to a high level fighter when he can be replaced like a cog in the machine by a prospect with a manufactured “World title.”
by Jonathan Snowden on Apr 27, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions
The PPV system of MMA isn’t the same as that of Boxing. MMA is set up with promotions, and those promotions have rosters and with those rosters they can choose to put on PPVs- aside from the going ons of lesser promotions or non-ZUFFA promotions that partake in cross promotion. Within those promotions there are going to be weight classes that have champions. The distinctions between these promotions are very clear. Everyone knew they were buying a WEC PPV even if the name didn’t exist becaues of television station conflicts.
The WEC put on a PPV with its top fighters in very relevant fights. Pay-per-views aren’t just reserved for the promotion will all the best fighters in the world. Any one can put on a PPV and charge whatever they want for it.. If its too expensive – like you state about WEC 48 – then the fans are going to respond in kind. The promotion makes a judgement on the worth of its card and the public decides if they want to buy it. There are no responsibilities outside of that.
In regard to your side point your situation you presented would only be dire if a premiere organization went about doing what you said. But because the premiere organization will have the high level talent there isn’t a problem. Lesser promotions do this all the time, and the public responds in kind by judging its worth and deciding itself.
Not that I condone facism or any ism for that matter. Isms are in my opinion, not good. A person shouldn't believe in an ism, he should believe in himself.
I quote John Lennon, "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me". Good point there, after all he was the walrus. I could be the walrus. Wouldn't change the fact I have to bum rides off of people.
by Sam Cupitt on Apr 27, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Everyone bought it knew they were buying a WEC PPV? Wasn’t the big talking point of the last few days that Zuffa did their best to make it appear to be a UFC PPV in virtually every way – in other words, to confuse the market into thinking they were buying a UFC product?
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 27, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
I’d put forth that if you are going to be swayed by Dana White heading up the promotion of the fight, you are also going to be swayed by the words that “this is just a pay-per-view show and this is the WEC not the UFC”.
You can’t have it one way and not the other.
Not that I condone facism or any ism for that matter. Isms are in my opinion, not good. A person shouldn't believe in an ism, he should believe in himself.
I quote John Lennon, "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me". Good point there, after all he was the walrus. I could be the walrus. Wouldn't change the fact I have to bum rides off of people.
I think there was a clear attempt made by Zuffa to market this as being at least a complementary product, if not an equal product, to their UFC cards. And clearly everything done was done with the intention of making this look exactly like a UFC show. None of it was done to establish the unique value of the WEC as its own franchise, in large part because virtually nothing was done to establish the show as a WEC show. I just don’t see how you can come away with that assessment then.
by VirtualBalboa on Apr 27, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
What was the point of this?
Pointing out that the guys in WEC weightclasses that also exist in the UFC aren’t as good? Holy Shit! I never could have put that together on my own.
I totally agree that Henderson and Cerone probably would not contend in the UFC LW class, however you never know. But to use that to throw guys like Aldo, Faber and Brown under the bus is just troll hackery.
by Razreshat on Apr 27, 2010 1:21 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Well
I think that WEC’s LW division is topheavy similar to how their MW division was; Filho and Sonnen are both very talented and have gone on to do some big things since the MW division folded. Sonnen (although he got clowned by Maia) went on to dominate guys like Miller, Okami, and Marquardt, and Filho’s won 3 straight over solid guys.
I’m not saying Bendo or Varner would dominate, but I could see them beating some good guys in the UFC. They’re both very well rounded, athletic, and have considerable skill sets.
Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"
Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A
by ElliotMatheny on Apr 27, 2010 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Bendo is tough as nails. I use to write him off all the time, quite like a always write off Jake Sheilds, but they keep proving me wrong. i think Bendo would do great in the UFC and if he did make the jump he would be at least mid tier for sure. The dude is way to durable.
Twitter @i_c_u_hater
http://dreamthemez.wordpress.com
by Thats It For you! on Apr 27, 2010 8:39 AM EDT reply actions

by 














