Evgeni Kogan, M-1 Global’s Director of Operations talks to sherdog.com:
"I think June, July is realistic (for Emelianenko’s return)."
"We were renegotiating. I think we’re pretty much at the end of that road," said Kogan. "After the CBS show, we thought that the terms needed a little bit tweaking -- nothing major, just a little bit of tweaking. So, we had a round of negotiations with Strikeforce. Everything went positively. We’re pretty much at the end."
"Obviously, we are much more than the management company for Fedor," said Kogan. "For us, it’s really important that the M-1 Global brand is acknowledged on these co-promotion events. As much as the partners made a lot of effort to acknowledge the co-branding, the media basically picked up on the fact that it was Strikeforce and kind of forgot about everything else, which wasn’t the most ideal for us."
-- Full interview at sherdog.com
almost 2 years ago
Nick Thomas
120 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Sleep on a large bed made of money I assume.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
lol nice.
"When i get in there, in his face ,pressin the action,I'm RUFF NECKIN'EM,I'm throwin him around,I'm punchin him,hes punchin me, I'm eatin his shots and I'm Blastin him back in the face he's not goin to be able to handle it ." - Chris Leben on how his fight with Anderson Silva is gonna go.
by Rayce. on Mar 9, 2010 1:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
every quote i hear from these guys at M1 makes me cringe
"Live fast, die."
by Bonedoctor on Mar 9, 2010 10:44 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Yawn
Wake me up when Fedor finally goes to the UFC. Otherwise, I care less about Fedor every day.
by MMAGuard on Mar 9, 2010 10:45 AM EST reply actions 7 recs
that iz the conclusion i have come to az well....
Fedor haz made himself irrellevant…….
"If I told you I was good, you would think I am boasting. If I told you I was not good, you would know I am lying" Bruce Lee
I guess you think S’s are irrelevant as well?
"For some reason Dana White doesn't like me, and I don't care enough to find out why. So he can go pound sand up his ass as far as I'm concerned."
Don Frye
by keyboardwarrior on Mar 9, 2010 1:52 PM EST up reply actions 7 recs
Because you're not important
Get it through your thick skulls.
maybe i'm just tired of all the played out zany russian jokes, and feel like playing devil's advocate...
… but the guy has a point. was M1 mentioned at all during the cbs broadcast? maybe only during the botched/rushed intro before fedor’s fight? if there was an agreement with strikeforce for that to happen, then don’t they have a right to complain or ask that it happens on future events? also didn’t they organize the european tv airings of the event?
never thought i’d see the day when i’d be defending these guys. just don’t think this is all that “out there”.
In Soviet Russia…promotion fights you!!!
From now on whatever event I am planning will be know as the ‘Bas Rutten Invitational ____’
by beery_pbr on Mar 9, 2010 11:11 AM EST up reply actions 6 recs
I’ve got a question, was Strikeforce mentioned at all during the broadcast? If it was, it was in passing. It was consistently referred to as Saturday night fights on CBS with little mention of anyone else.
I watched that card looking for how they would play the copromotion aspect and remember thinking that is was being played as a CBS promotion more than either M-1 or Strikeforce. I don’t know statistics on number of mentions per group but that was the impression I took away.
"Will Rogers never met Barry Switzer."
In my country
which is in Asia (5 points if you can guess where :) ) the broadcast we received included quite a few M-1 highlights in between fights , and the M-1 brand was mentioned or at least showed a few times during these. So I’m assuming the broadcast I saw was the same that whole Europe and Asia got (I’m talking about a one day delay broadcast because of the time difference…)
M-1 probably thinks this isn’t enough and they want the live U.S show to have more M-1 in it . Whatever …
It wouldn’t matter if they said M1 Global every three seconds. In the end, casuals will still see it as “Ultimate fighting.” The only real winner is the UFC.
You have to be the man... you have to be very, like, alpha male with her. You know? Decide what you do and everything. So, show her who's the boss, you know? - GSP
by pud333 on Mar 9, 2010 6:42 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
As much as the partners made a lot of effort to acknowledge the co-branding, the media basically picked up on the fact that it was Strikeforce and kind of forgot about everything else,
They aren’t griping that Strikeforce didn’t do their part they are griping that the media reporting on the event didn’t give a crap about M-1 global. Apparently they want Strikeforce to correct the media talking about the events now.
M1 Global & Strikeforce, a typical Co-dependent relationship?
This M1& Strikeforce marriage is all going to end badly.
M1 is always accused of “wanting too much”. But Strikeforce also wants too much from this relationship. I believe Strikforce thinks that in signing Fedor, they had somehow found the ‘holy grail’ that will help them compete with the UFC.
So Strikeforce can’t resist being strong-armed into re-negotiations. However, there must be a limit to how much ‘strong-arming’ one can take? Strikeforce needs to start questioning the risk/reward relationship they have with M1. It seems that SF is giving away a whole lot, and are they getting what they want in return? Are they target from this relationship simply unreachable?
I hope they don’t follow the Affiliction route and fold from the live event business. But I think they seriously need to just focus on growing organically instead of trying to leverage too much from one fighter to raise their profile. They could put the money they spend on the Fedor/M1 contract into signing several decent fighters and see a better return than at present.
From a business point of view, it just looks like SF have put themselves in a poor position. You have a fighter/management team in M1 that has you by your balls. There are some deals you really have to just walk away from.
The UFC takes a lot of heat, but you will not strong-arm them into any deal, no matter who you are. Strikeforce and M1 and suffering because both parties expect too much from there relationship. SF will only start to see success when they stop trying to chase the UFC. The UFC is way to big at present for them to compete with.
by higgledy-piggledy on Mar 19, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions
BE might as well start a weekly column on M1 and what legal debate/contract negotiation they got in this week.
"So I put 2 and 2 together and decided that your pissing me off" "Here. Its a fruit roll up. I was gonna make you a casserole for your loss but uh... I didnt"
"So its sorta like that movie the predator, except for hunting people hes takin a crap" - Carl from ATHF
by II SMASH II on Mar 9, 2010 11:21 AM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
They should produce a sitcom based on the relationship between Scott Coker and Vadim.
by Worldisart on Mar 9, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I love you
But I’m not IN love with you- Vladim
"So I put 2 and 2 together and decided that your pissing me off" "Here. Its a fruit roll up. I was gonna make you a casserole for your loss but uh... I didnt"
"So its sorta like that movie the predator, except for hunting people hes takin a crap" - Carl from ATHF
by II SMASH II on Mar 9, 2010 11:30 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Strikeforce Deathwatch?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
CBS Saturday Night Fights brought to you by M-1 Global and their partners Strikeforce!
by Dropkick434 on Mar 9, 2010 11:35 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I know we have to always point out that M-1 is awful…
but there is a reality here that I think is going to get overlooked. From what I understand the terms in the contract are very explicit in explaining how M-1 is to be presented on these broadcasts. If CBS and Strikeforce failed to live up to their end of the contract than they left the door open for M-1 to pull this off.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 11:43 AM EST reply actions
M-1 drives me nuts because they always seem to be what stands between Fedor meeting the other top fighters. But the thing is they are a business, which Fedor holds a sizable chunk of, and you can’t fault a business for leveraging its primary asset. They have Fedor, that’s all they have. But to blame them for using him to get what they want is tantamount to blaming Dana White for having to go to the Fertillas because the didn’t have money.
Exactly. They do a LOT of things wrong. They do truly seem like scum much of the time.
But they don’t want co-promotion for vanity reasons. They’re trying to grow their business. If CBS and SF failed to do this correctly then the only card M-1 could play is Fedor. And honestly 99% of good businessmen would do exactly the same thing.
Does that mean I am a huge fan of M-1 or think they’re wonderful people? No. But this isn’t one of those cases where I’m really upset as we’ve learned more details.
When the primary story came out it looked as though M-1 was just making a money grab on no basis. That would have upset me. This does not.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
People are too parochial in their view on mma and I think are missing what m-1 is trying to do. They are trying to build a major mma promotion based in Russia, but targeting audiences in the former Soviet states, Korea, Eastern Europe, and eventually Japan and North America. They are doing this with little money and very few top fighters. So what to do? Piggy back off other promotions using the #1 HW in the world. Now they can broadcast an m-1 event back to the home territories with a great card they could never have afforded in the first place. Genius in annoying contractual nightmare way.
And they have very little
time to do it. If Fedor loses or retires, the game is over. M1 will actually have to provide services.
BOTH M1 & STRIKEFORCE ARE DELUSIONAL & DESERVE EACH OTHER
Both of them need to check themselves. M1 will not get the equal co-promoting exposure it wants, and SF will not boost its popularity that much more being associated with Fedor.
All I see is a bunch of unrealistic goals from SF and M1.
SF doesn’t mouth off its goals like M1, but we all know why they agreed to the Co-promote with M1.
M1 wants to leverage its fighter to promote itself at the expense of SF own exposure. SF might as well just let M1 take credit for the all the events. If SF knows what’s good for them, they should stop this Co-promoting BS right now or they’ll have every fighter thinking they can negotiate a SF contract demanding Co-promotion rights. Now that is just silly if you ask me.
I understand Fedor is a big signing, but at what expense? I’m assuming he’s compensated well financially, but now his management company want to take away your ‘shine’ for putting the whole shindig together. SF must like to be bullied.
by higgledy-piggledy on Mar 19, 2010 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions
I said this issue was going to come up right after the first Strikeforce event Fedor fought on.
Here is a couple of the comments I made back then when I stated M-1 wouldn’t be happy with the exposure they got on that show:
From the comments in this thread: http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2009/11/10/1124851/strikeforces-fedor-emelianenko-vs
Vadim stated in the past the whole point of demanding co-promotion was to garner exposure for M-1 Global. I didn’t notice much exposure at all for M-1 Global during the broadcast. So I’m assuming they can’t be happy with what they got out of the deal. At least if exposure was what they really wanted.
That got this reply came from MMASuPreMaCy:
There were Strikeforce and M-1 Global signs all over the broadcast, they just didn’t go out of their way to mention it. Even WAMMA got exposure during the broadcast. EA and HDNet made a killing.
I followed up with:
I disagree with this.
Here is why. Because I watched the show and I’m telling you I barely even noticed anything about M-1. The only time I remember seeing anything about M-1 is coming out of commercial breaks. This is coming from someone who knows what M-1 is. I have a hard time believing a casual fan without any knowledge of M-1 would even recall them being a part of the broadcast at all.
Next time someone gets and interview with Vadim will they ask him if M-1 got the exposure out of that broadcast that he wanted. I’m saying the answer will be no.
This has been an issue with all their previous co-promoting partners. So I actually believe exposure was a legitimate gripe this time in the renegotiation between M-1 and Strikeforce. But money is always an issue too.
Just BE.
by mattman73 on Mar 9, 2010 11:43 AM EST reply actions 6 recs
I will rec any post being fair to M1 over mob and vodka jokes.
M1 may be bad, but it’s so overblown because of the “scary foreign crooks” mentality. And people lose their shit over their conflict of interest but the AKA management/trainers monopoly gets away with their BS and fans only care about the WW division being clogged up. It’s a shocking level of xenophobia that runs rampant through a community of otherwise intelligent people.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Mar 9, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree
If only because a company should make sure that their interests are are taken care of. I also don’t know if there is any truth to the Russian mob, just that negotiations are different in Russia and the US. I know this because my father did quite a bit of exporting to Russia and had to be a hard ass because caving on any points is seen as weakness.
But Vadim should drink some Vodka and change his name to Don Vadim because he’s in the mob. ; )
twitter.com/thisredengine
by Matthew Roth on Mar 9, 2010 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
Bravo!!
I am very glad to hear some one pointing to this very prevalent Xenophobic issue with a majority of North American fans. I wonder at times if this is all the messages where people such as Dana White parrot Unfounded negative statements continously and eventually in gets ingrained into the view points and opinions of NA fans who see these statements as unquestionded truth and eventually their own opinion
I think that the hostility toward M1
Comes almost entirely from the (accurate) perception people have that they are the main stumbling block preventing Fedor from fighting top heavyweights. I see all of the mob/soviet/russia jokes being more symptom than disease.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
Here's a question for you:
How much did you notice Strikeforce’s brand being pushed at that show, as compared to CBS? Hardly at all, yes? I mean, I would have that Strikeforce was a show on CBS if I didn’t know better.
That said, do you think M-1 did more than Strikeforce in terms of putting that show together? Would you expect them to get more airtime than Strikeforce did?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
This times a million....
the exposure the SF name got doesn’t factor in to this discussion in any way. It’s not about how much recognition SF got, it’s about how much M-1 got as a co promoter.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
"as a co promoter"
Does that not imply that they get the same amount of exposure as Strikeforce? If so then Strikeforce’s exposure is a baseline for determining if M-1 got hosed. (That being said I know nothing of the contracts and feel free to rip me apart)
"Will Rogers never met Barry Switzer."
If CBS's team didn't acknowledge Strikeforce then that's between Strikefore and CBS
It has nothing to do with M1’s gripe with Strikeforce. If the contract says we get 20 mentions per show as Strikeforce and M1 global presents and that was a sticking point in the contract to sign Fedor, if they were mentioned 19 times, that means a breach of contract. It’s on Strikeforce to make sure they are mentioned not the other way around.
twitter.com/thisredengine
by Matthew Roth on Mar 9, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions
No. As I said earlier. I’m sure the language in the contract is very explicit in how M-1 is to be presented on the broadcast. It would never say something like “whatever you get, we get”
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
I agree
And like I said, I don’t know the contracts. And if Strikeforce made an agreement with M-1 for a specfic number or type of mention and didn’t put that in the CBS agreement then they are idiots, and M-1 is in the right (sorry, just puked in my mouth a little).
"Will Rogers never met Barry Switzer."
You say you're sure, but you've never seen the contract.
If it says, “presented as equal partners” or something of the like, then it could very well say that.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
The language would almost certainly be much more explicit. But if we’re just going to play the M-1 is evil in every possible way game…then I’m done discussing it.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Who said that they're evil?
Are you following who you’re talking to?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
Not directed specifically at you as much as everyone harping on the “they should have to do more if they want to get talked about as co-promoters” despite the fact that it is a part of the contract.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
I'm not saying any of that.
And no offense, but the level of certainty you’re expressing about a contract you’ve never seen is WAY more unreasonable than what you’re complaining about.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
I’m speaking with a level of certainty based on seeing several other contracts and knowing that M-1 does not seem to be too keen on leaving themselves to get fucked over. They seem to be the ones doing the fucking.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
The problem with your theory
…is that they’re renegotiating. They’re not claiming in ANY way that the contract they had was not fulfilled. They’re claiming that they didn’t get what they wanted and so they’re writing a new contract that lays out what they want more clearly.
Right?
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
According to M-1 Global, Strikeforce has not honored the contract that they signed with M-1 and the only way Fedor will fight in a Strikeforce cage again is if they sign a new contract.
That was their entire thing that started it was that M-1 felt the contract had not been honored.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
Then why aren't they threatening legal action instead of renegotiating?
The way they use the word “honored” there makes it sound like they feel that they got weaseled by Strikeforce on the last contract and are trying to be more explicit this time around.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
There are many reasons to not seek legal action.
Top of which would be that if SF goes under they lose their current money making vehicle. Why threaten legal action if you can get them to re-negotiate a deal that does better for you?
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
But again:
they aren’t really stating that Strikeforce failed to meet the terms of the contract.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
“For us, it’s really important that the M-1 Global brand is acknowledged on these co-promotion events. As much as the partners made a lot of effort to acknowledge the co-branding, the media basically picked up on the fact that it was Strikeforce and kind of forgot about everything else, which wasn’t the most ideal for us.”
So what is this actually about then? They flat out say that their “partners” made a lot of effort to acknowledge the co-promotion it was just that the media didn’t portray it that way. Is it’s Strikeforce/CBS’s responsibility to make sure the people reporting on the event mention M-1 Global too? Is CBS supposed to be sending threatening letters to reporters who don’t call the events “Strikeforce/M-1 Global presents” now?
Well put. CBS + Strikeforce + M-1 = too many cooks in the kitchen. My roommates and I watched the event and they all kept saying “Wait, so is this UFC? CBS does fights now too?” If that confused them, you can only imagine how many “WTF?” I’d get from “Well, it’s a CBS BROADCAST and a Strikeforce event, but they co-promote with this third foreign company called M-1” etc etc
Without opening up the “Why hasn’t the UFC made a broadcast deal yet?” can o’ worms, the fact is broadcast networks look for control and that is playing a part in why the UFC hasn’t signed on a dotted line since it loves authority over it’s content.
by LikeTheWhiskey on Mar 9, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions
Ah Strikeforce, we hardly knew ye
Seriously: add them to Dana’s headstone list. Fedor really is the greatest fighter ever, if only measured in the number of promotions he’s killed.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ.
I blog at TangleBones - you should follow me on Twitter here.
If you like it, you should put a rec on it.
by jemaleddin on Mar 9, 2010 11:55 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
Is this a joke?
Can BE just ignore all Finkelstien /M1 quotes? or at least leave them on them on the fan posts. Im tired of reading their BS.
by Td9d on Mar 9, 2010 12:00 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
No
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Strikeforce got the attention they got because they actually promoted the fights and the event. M-1 got little exposure because they simply provided a fighter or two and did very little of the actual promotion, they were not involved in 1% of what it took to get that event from nothing into a show on CBS, Strikeforce was, thats why their name was #1 that night.
I'm old school hating Lesnar, I've been hating Lesnar since '08
Doesn't matter...
what matters is what M-1’s contract says they get on shows featuring Fedor. It’s not really a hard concept to grasp.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions
who is to say they didnt get what they agreed on? all that’s come out is M-1 is complaining. given M-1’s track record, that’s not a hard concept to grasp either
I'm old school hating Lesnar, I've been hating Lesnar since '08
I am seriously showing off my ignorance...
and I apologize for it but I really don’t have the chance to follow Strikeforce except when its on free TV. I get that both M-1 and Strikeforce are co-promoting. Is Fedor all that M-1 is bringing over to Strikeforce? What other fighters of theirs is fighting on CBS?
"The ball always seems to find Ed Reed...The man is a menace"
by UMBC Oriole fan on Mar 9, 2010 12:23 PM EST reply actions
None (since Mousasi left M-1). Yes, it seems like complete bullshit but the terms of signing Fedor were to present the shows on which he appeared as co promoted by M-1.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
So if I get this straight, and sorry as I am sure this has been explained prior but I tried to look it up and I couldn’t make sense of it…
Any show with Fedor means co-promote which I assume that means cutting the profits in half but with costs going to StrikeForce…for just one fighter. Am I correct in this?
"The ball always seems to find Ed Reed...The man is a menace"
by UMBC Oriole fan on Mar 9, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
I’m just assuming a 50/50 split, I am sure its different in the contracts or whatever.
"The ball always seems to find Ed Reed...The man is a menace"
by UMBC Oriole fan on Mar 9, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think the deal is a 50/50 profit split.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah...
that would be insane. But M-1 doesn’t face the monetary liabilities from a Fedor event right? I mean, its Strikeforce that puts the capital up, puts the even together, and then M-1 gets a cut for Fedor.
Again, I’m completely ignorant of the whole situation and I appreciate you clearing this up for me. Just as an outside viewer, this deal seems to heavily favor M-1 but I guess that is the consensus among everyone.
"The ball always seems to find Ed Reed...The man is a menace"
by UMBC Oriole fan on Mar 9, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
What they said long ago was that their definition of co-promotion (I believe it was Jerryu Millen from M1, but I am sure I will be corrected) is that they take the production costs, the fighter costs, all the costs and split those down the middle, then they take the money they made, and if it is positive they split the proceeds, if negative, they split the losses. Of course Fedor gets his salary no matter what and M1 gets a percent for being his manager
Karl Amassou is an M1 fighter as well, correct?
Or did he just fight in M1 challenge?
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
You may be right. I’m honestly not sure
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
I think he is m1. I remember there was talk about how Fedor, Mousasi, and Karl where going to be the cornerstones of m-1. That was until Mousasi left, of course.
Not sure why my message above didn't show up...
but yeah, that’s probably correct.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
Here’s a novel idea: maybe if M-1 wants to be seen as a full fledged co-promoter they should maybe actually co-promote; you know, take half the financial risk for the event and all. Maybe they can even spend money on marketing the event.
by Polyhedron on Mar 9, 2010 12:25 PM EST via mobile reply actions
They don’t want to merely be credited for just that though.
by Polyhedron on Mar 9, 2010 12:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Doesn't matter...
being upset with M-1 because they got a sweet deal is pointless.
Be upset with Strikeforce for accepting the deal. If no promotion would accept this as a term to sign Fedor…then it wouldn’t be an issue.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
Brent, so is the plan for Fedor to now fight on another card in June? Mayhem announced that he is fighting in May, and with Cung Le, Joey Villasenor (against Tim Kennedy?), Vitor Ribeiro, Frank Shamrock, and Roger Huerta all hinting that they are fighting in May does that mean they are planning a second show that month?
I thought Fedor would be back in May, but I think that May show will be on Showtime. With a CBS show in late June or early July. That is much more likely to be a “last stand” situation than the April event.
This is all just me trying to piece together a lot of different information coming from a lot of different directions.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
Someone at Television City told me a couple weeks ago that Fedor would be on CBS in May. I was interested, but kind of wrote it off as coming from someone who doesn’t follow mma and mixed up the April and May dates. Later, when they announced no Fedor in April, but m-1 saying he was training for May, and then the other HWs signed to that date, I started to think a May show might be in the works. Who knows now?
I think it was a possibility, but I think less so now than a few weeks ago.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
I’m back on with Fedor fighting in May. It makes too much sense for him to be on a May CBS card with Overeem. The whole June/July talk is to keep the UFC guessing.
You bet wrong. This is as much CBS/Showtime’s promotion as it is Coker’s
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions
This speculation could be very wrong based on only 1 show but CBS seemed to want to brand the events as “CBS Saturday Night Fights”. Strikeforce even seemed to take a back seat a little bit in the promotion of “CBS Saturday Night Fights” for that last event.
My question is if CBS wants to keep the events branded as “CBS Saturday Night Fights” instead of some variation of “CBS/M-1/Strikeforce presents whatever” do they put the events Fedor fights on strictly on Showtime from here on out?
Just BE.
Coker said it himself when he was making the rounds for the Rogers fight, M-1’s job has been just to bring Fedor.
by Polyhedron on Mar 9, 2010 12:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
whether the responsibilities are split 50/50, is kind of irrelevant. strikeforce was dumb enough to accept this kind of arrangement, so they should expect these kinds of developments to happen. and if they committed to certain things (like mentioning m1 x number of times), then they’re obligated to do so.
plus, i’m not totally clued into the whole arrangement, but like i asked up above, doesn’t M1 coordinator the overseas promotion of the events they co-promote?
Both SF and M1 need some better PR people.
If the issue is how often M1 was mentioned during the first broadcast, they should have said that right away. Or if they thought the problem could be fixed before this April card (or this may card) they should have said this was the reason for renegotiating when it first came out that they were renegotiating.
It’s possible that M1 had issues with the november card and has been trying to get those problem rectified since then, but the way this situation was handled, from all sides, it’s not hard to see why people can interpret this as M1 trying to shakedown Strikeforce just before a very important show.
They should open the next show by saying “M-1” 200 times consecutively.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
M1 should try to promote an event on their own w/ Fedor headlining it. I would assume that after Affliction and SF/CBS that they have atleast enough funds to do one event. This should make M1 management appreciate what Coker and Atencio are/was doing for them.
Sure the M1 brand was not promoted as agreed upon, but they should understand that promoting Fedor himself isnt that easy and they have to take care of that first. The first CBS show was all about Fedor, they should be happy with that atleast and give a leeway for SF to build enough equity and stop worrying about themselves. Host should come first before the parasite.
I am. I think. I will. - Ayn Rand
by vivero on Mar 9, 2010 12:43 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
That is the problem, it doesnt give a shit and it holds back the best fighter that ever lived from doing what he is meant to do.
I am. I think. I will. - Ayn Rand
What does M-1 have to do with Sugar Ray Robinson?
by ufc4 on Mar 9, 2010 11:22 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The big story everyone is missing is this:
“Everyone else is still onboard — nothing else, in that respect, has changed,” said Kogan. “We’re working less with Jerry (Millen) then we were. Gerry is producing the Challenge shows for us, but not the Selection events.”
by John Nash on Mar 9, 2010 12:43 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
The real issue here is m-1 ducking Overeem
there , I said it .
Fedor is M1. he gets beat and the lucrative contracts and making orgs jump threw hoops is over. As long as they can keep convincing people he is the #1 Fighter in MMA there set. Hard to convince somebody he is number 1 if he gets beat. Im not saying Overeem would beat him but M1 is going to take that chance. Same reason he didn’t sign with the UFC.
"Frank Mir had a horseshoe up his ass. I told him a year ago. I pulled it out of him and I beat him over the head with it." Brock Lesnar
They are not only ducking Overeem, but..
They are ducking all of the top 10 HWs in the world…
Fedor is being ‘dry docked’ while all of these fighters are training and fighting 2-4 times a year.
He is not maintaing his top 5 HW rank in the world…maybe outside of the UFC he is…
M-1 thinks that they are doing Fedor and themselves a favor by making their best efforts to HAND PICK all of his opponents, and have him fight only once a year…
They are cutting their nose to spite their face…by keeping him sidelined!
MMA is different NOW. It is a growing living animal. It is not like boxing. It is a young sport within the media. It is growing exponentially without Fedor! He has been surpassed in the HW division by young HWs.
M1 is doing a good job of keeping his record unblemished, BUT, that is not that important in MMA, maybe in boxing, but not MMA. No one cares that Brock Lesnar lost to Frank Mir. But if you fight enough, you can avenge your losses and theoretically erase them.
M1 is doing a diservice to Fedor by protecting him and not allowing him to fight as often…
The real issue here is m-1 ducking Overeem
Totally.
That’s why they are booking him against a guy who ALREADY BEAT OVEREEM.
by Steve4192 on Mar 9, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs

























