Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

The problem with UFC's counter programming & the fan support

Now, i'll be the first guy to say that the more MMA the better, but in the case of the upcoming counter programming efforts against Strikeforce: Nashville, I have to say that it's just foolish on the UFC's part.  And i'm kinda surprised that more people aren't up in arms about this; this move leaves everyone without a DVR with the dilemma of picking between shows (and unless the UFC comes up with a barnburner main event, I see them losing in a head to head battle anyway).

I can understand liking the UFC & WEC, because they have a good product and consistently put on good fights.  But the whole attitude of "Zuffa fanboyism" is something I don't get; I actually think that some of the business moves Zuffa does are detrimental to the overall growth/ development of the sport (IE counter programming Strikeforce, refusing to copromote, the harsh way they treat the fighters, etc).  

Strikeforcenashposter_medium

 

I agree with what Coker said about the UFC putting the show up against SF Nashville being a dick move; why not just let Strikeforce do their thing on CBS (I doubt they'll ever do any significant PPV sales more than once or twice a year), and just allow some more eyes to soak in the sport?  It would be better if they actually put that card on a different day, so that the sport as a whole could get more exposure.

Zuffa already has nearly a death clutch (pun intended) on all the sports linear champs, Fedor excluded, so why can't they just let Strikeforce play the clear #2 spot?  Coker has said that he has no qualms with the UFC, and they basically operate on completely different platforms (UFC/ WEC with their Spike & Versus shows + PPV's, as opposed to Strikeforce's CBS deal and planned PPV).  Dana is going to have to allow some of the other orgs like SF as well as Bellator get off some successful shows on TV if they ever want to have more national exposure & mainstream acceptance.

I know i'm not alone here.

Poll
Am I crazy or should Zuffa ease some of the pressure off of Strikeforce?
Yes they should, SF isn't a big threat and like Coker said, was able to bring some older eyes to the sport on CBS
130 votes
No way dude, DEATH TO ALL BUT ZUFFA
101 votes
Who gives a shit?
73 votes

304 votes | Poll has closed

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.

Comment 31 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I actually think that some of the business moves Zuffa does are detrimental to the overall growth/ development of the sport (IE counter programming Strikeforce, refusing to copromote, the harsh way they treat the fighters, etc).

You can look at that two ways. Some people, myself included, would like all elite fighters in one organization – the UFC. The sooner that happens the sooner we get fights like Fedor vs. Lesnar. So driving Strikeforce out of business could eventually be a positive thing. With multiple promotions having having elite level fighters in several different promotions MMA could end up like boxing.

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Ben Franklin

by donkeypunch on Mar 14, 2010 7:51 PM EDT reply actions  

The Versus show isn't counter programming

Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"

by Blackout612 on Mar 14, 2010 8:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Corrected

It was actually originally a reply to another post, but I decided that it was in depth enough to merit it’s own discussion. Forgot to take out the Versus part

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"

Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A

by ElliotMatheny on Mar 15, 2010 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

One upside of counter-programing is

that is pushes all parties to step up their game.

An example: The above poster is one of the worst I have seen. Not simply for MMA, but overall.

Tiny font in a color that blends into the background. no mention of a title being on the line (let alone THREE titles) , the picture is not flattering to either fighter…I could go on and on.

A better one could be made by plenty of fans at home.

Coker and co need to step up and do a much better job of promoting themselves. The numbers for the fist CBS event were ok, but they need to do better to keep CBS (this is the last show on the current deal).

If the UFC were to go head to head, it would result in both companies needing to step up and deliver the goods. I like the idea of competition forcing all parties to push the envelope.

There are plenty of those that blindly love all things Zuffa, but there are also those that hate everything Zuffa, outside of the bouts themselves.

The reality is that Zuffa is hardly an evil employer, most of the fighters are quite happy. Even Rampage, who is still on shaky grounds with Dana, recently said that the UFC has treated him better than Pride did. Dana and co certainly do some questionable stuff, but they are neither saints nor devils, but somewhere in between.

The same holds true for Coker and co. Of late, Scott has made a number of…dubious statements. Is he a liar? Not reall, he is simply stepping into the role of carny. A role that Dana has had for years.

If they do both run on April 17th, I expect we would see two outstanding shows as both companies bust their ass to come out on top.

I get your opposition to it, but I understand the business side of it and also remember that the pro wrestling wars of 96-00 resulted in a couple of years of amazing shows by both companies as each attempted to out-perform the other.

Regardless of whether or not a UFC show happens, SF needs to promote the hell out of this and make it the biggest show of the year. They need to get fans pumped up for it like no other and make it a must-see event! It is a hell of a card and should be promoted as such.

by Lynchman on Mar 14, 2010 8:41 PM EDT reply actions  

DREAM should share there poster artists too LOL!

HI YAH!

by Thats It For you! on Mar 16, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I hate to break it to you but the UFC isn’t counter-programming SF, all the talk is just misinformation thrown out there by Zuffa to get Coker to shit his pants a little. The Versus card is on march 21st.

by ufc4 on Mar 14, 2010 8:53 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

The UFC needs to look out for their own business, that is their job. If they can do better numbers than a SF card on Spike, that will give them evidence to help them get a network TV deal.

Also, if they can kill SF, they have another chance to get Fedor.

Everyone loves to laugh and joke when Fedor or Hendo signs with SF, but no one likes when Zuffa plays hardball back. If you want competition, this is competition.

by Phildo on Mar 14, 2010 9:15 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Well said, what I find even more ridiculous is all the people talking about how great it is to have more free mma. Yet when the UFC puts on several stacked free shows all of a sudden they are flooding the market and oversaturating mma. The double standards and hypocrisy when it comes to zuffa on here sometimes just amazes me.

by Raker on Mar 14, 2010 10:56 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

It's 100% true

Because honestly, the UFC isn’t anywhere near big enough to have the problem of ‘oversaturating’ the market. Starbucks oversaturated the market and had to downsize. When FRIENDS was the biggest show on TV, they had to cut down on their marketing because people were getting sick of it.

But in reality, the UFC just doesn’t have the kind of financial means that Friends or Starbucks have. At this point, anything they do is just to grow their brand

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"

Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A

by ElliotMatheny on Mar 15, 2010 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Business is business and Coker knew what he was doing signing Fedor, but really I think a strictly Zuffa product right now is not the way to go.

by Koob on Mar 15, 2010 2:10 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Strikeforce is a joke of an org and won’t shed a tear if they get taken out. Remember when they signed Dan Henderson, it was to bolster their roster. But they did a 180 on us and now are forcing Dan Henderson to replace Fedor. That’s dirty pool and nobody is calling them out on it.

And they reward the guy who forced millions of people to change the channel the last time he fought on CBS with a main event slot? That’s hogwash. They have so few great fighters that they can’t hold any of them accountable. I still can’t believe CBS signed off on that fight for the main event.

And they use Hershel Walker to draw eyeballs. That’s a crime. It would be one thing if he was being forced to take on the other Strikeforce heavyweights, but he’s not. Strikeforce actually has to go and hire low-level MMA fighters for him to take on. Fighters so low level they make Bo Cantrell look like Heath Herring. They do the same thing with Bobby Lashley (only the bums they have to sign for him to beat aren’t as flagrantly offensive). It’s a real crappy way to run an MMA org.

They aren’t good for the sport at all. They use gimmick fighters and reward boring fighters. They need to be taken out of business to protect MMA. Everybody on this site would watch the event if it was on at 2 in the morning. They should think about the casual audience these Strikeforce events are actually being marketed to and take a step back and ask themselves if they really think Strikeforce is doing a good job at that.

Zuffa does a lot of things wrong to, but nothing embarrassing or incompetent. Zuffa could have signed up Hershel Walker, Jose Canseco, Dustin Diamond and Horshack and made a mockery of MMA too, but they have more respect for the sport than that. So for now, they are the only org worthy to bring high level MMA to the public in my opinion.

by mattio on Mar 15, 2010 2:22 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

And they reward the guy who forced millions of people to change the channel the last time he fought on CBS with a main event slot? That’s hogwash.

I thought this was odd too. All I remember about the last show (other than Fedor;s epic KO) was all the talk about how they’ll never put Jake Shields on CBS again. Well not only is he on there again, he;s in the fucking main event. Hendo isn’t a big enough name to carry this show on his own and this fight is why they are doomed to poor ratings this time around.

by ufc4 on Mar 15, 2010 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

This.

I didn’t vote because the choices are biased.

As far as the counter programming goes… I don’t get the outrage. It happens all the time on TV. It happens on TV every damn night. For example here is some mock quotes to show the outrage over a couple counter programming efforts happening tonight.

OHHH!!!! I’m so outraged CBS is counter programming NBC’s crime/drama Law & Order tonight with their own crime/drama CSI:Miami. CBS should just lay off NBC and not counter program with the exact same type show like that.

One more and the outrage over CBS’s own counter programming efforts seems to be growing:

OHHH!!!! I’m so outraged CBS is counter programming NBC’s “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno” tonight with their own late night talk show “Late Show with David Letterman”. I can’t believe CBS would counter program NBC twice in one night. There is no call for that. NBC is the #4 network and CBS is the #1 network. I don’t get why CBS feels the need to always be counter programming NBC all the time. They are just a bunch of bullies.

Come on now. The TV business is full of counter programing and direct competition all the time. Which happens to be exactly how business all over the world works. They compete for market share. So for the life of me I can’t figure out why anyone thinks the MMA business should be an altruistic business where the UFC should be looking out for the welfare of their competitors.

Just BE.

by mattman73 on Mar 15, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Poor examples

Those are established networks. MMA is hardly even close to being mainstream; if you want the big money and freak athletes to come to MMA, then it’s in everyone’s interest for MMA to keep growing.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"

Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A

by ElliotMatheny on Mar 16, 2010 2:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Regardless of the business genre when companies enter the same market place they compete for market share whether they are mainstream or not. So the fact MMA is not mainstream has nothing to do with direct competition.

You mention it’s in everyone’s interest for MMA to keep growing. The UFC has plans to grow the sport. Their plans for growing the sport just happen to be in the UFC’s best interest. Which is what every industry leader does in their genre of business.

Bottom line is MMA organizations shouldn’t have altruistic expectations placed on them. That just isn’t how business works. Companies don’t look out for the welfare of their competition. In the real world successful companies are built on sound business models that plan for and expect competition. If Strikeforce has a good business model they should be able to handle the competition. If they don’t it is their own fault and they will fail just like in any other genre of business.

Just BE.

by mattman73 on Mar 16, 2010 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

It has everything to do with it.

Television is not an expanding market, hence they battle for market share. MMA is a market that can rapidly expand or, god forbid, utterly collapse. Rapid expansion and market growth is best achieved by reaching maximum amounts of consumers. A CBS show reaches more than the top 3 selling UFC PPVs of all time combined.

The UFC has shown they are willing to sacrifice market growth for market share, even though their market share isn’t really being significantly threatened.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Mar 17, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry about that

More than anything they’re just tongue in cheek, but you certainly shouldn’t feel bad for voting for any of the choices. In essence, 1 means you agree with me, 2 means you don’t, and 3 means you just don’t really care either way (for whatever reason)

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"

Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A

by ElliotMatheny on Mar 15, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I beg to differ
this move leaves everyone without a DVR with the dilemma of picking between shows (and unless the UFC comes up with a barnburner main event, I see them losing in a head to head battle anyway).

The UFC could put together Sam Stout vs. Joe Lauzon II as a main event, and they would still win. The mere fact that they are in the position to potentially take away viewers from SF while being able to counter program with minimal investment (the power of branding) means they come out on top either way. Not to mention, even if the show is marginally profitable, it’s a higher risk/reward just on the basis of making it harder for SF to get a leg up in this fight.

But the whole attitude of “Zuffa fanboyism” is something I don’t get; I actually think that some of the business moves Zuffa does are detrimental to the overall growth/ development of the sport (IE counter programming Strikeforce, refusing to copromote, the harsh way they treat the fighters, etc).

Bullet points don’t make for much of an argument. These are not the detriments you assume them to be. Case in point: refusing to co-promote. I guess Josh Gross has more fans than I thought because the idea of co-promoting is not a blessing.

It’s easy to point to M-1 as a good example of what happens when co-promoting goes wrong. But it’s more important not to focus on M-1 itself so much as it is to focus on the fact that self-interest will always get in the way. Each organization functions on a different schedule, and being able to share fighters at the most optimal time is rarely practical. Not to mention, it can dilute inner-organizational matchmaking. What happens when fighter A is on track to meet fighter B, but fighter A must meet the obligations of a different org? Matchmaking is tricky enough: it’s even trickier when fighter availability becomes an issue by choice.

Co-promotion is a pipe dream, and not a very attractive one at that. Small organizations co-promote because they have to. I guarantee you, if they made more money, they’d focus on strengthening their brand, and one of the ways of doing that is by showcasing fighters who represent that brand exclusively. Remember the Strikeforce merchandise numbers? While not the cause, co-promoting doesn’t help that.

As for counter programming, in what way is this detrimental? People who watch SpikeTV will watch the UFC. People who watch CBS in the proper demographic will watch Strikeforce. Hardcore fans will find a way to watch both, legally or not, and media coverage will remain the same. Meanwhile, the fighters remain active, and thus make more money, and receive more exposure.

This fan post was nothing more than a half-assed emotional plea for Zuffa to stop shoving the middle schoolers in their lockers.

by David Castillo on Mar 15, 2010 9:38 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Not at all. This fan post is an attempt to start a serious discussion about the divergent interests of the MMA fan and Zuffa, the dominant producer of MMA events. Your interests and Zuffa’s interests only interesect at one point…the desire to have entertaining fights. The many more areas where Zuffa’s interest and our interests are at odds deserve to be discussed much more thuroughly than has been done heretofore. Dana White and Zuffa’s cheif interest is this: Extract as much money from the consumer as possible while keeping costs to a minimum. That is ALWAYS their cheif interest (5$ for a bottle of water at a fan expo is a nice example). They can accomplish this best when they have no competition in the marketplace.
 Think of diamonds and DeBeers. We all like diamonds but wouldn’t they be less expensive if there was a reputable competitor producing quality diamonds? Unlike diamonds there is no limit to the potential production of quality MMA events.
  Zuffa isn’t afraid of what SF is today but what they might become. Their product becomes a little less valuable of a similar product is offered to the consumer free of charge. If the current growth trend continues, SF will be able cut into PPV revenues if they hold free live events on the same night. Ultimately, this could lead to an agreement of each side not countering each other SF could be able to acheive their ultimate ambition of holdinig a successfull PPV. It wont come fast or easy. Zuffa will have to feel the pain of SF countering their PPV’s with a free CBS product, but atl east it is within reason that this could occur.
This would all be beneficial to us because it creates more demand for quality fighters. More money for more shows on more networks is the best way to insure that MMA will attract the best athletes in the world.

by naturalist on Mar 16, 2010 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you

that’s exactly what I was trying to say.

Honestly, i’m the one to blame here because I basically copy + pasted a response I was writing for another thread and making it into a fanpost, instead of just doing the work from scratch. But the intent remains: Zuffa’s vicious counter- programming efforts can be detrimental to the growth of the sport IMO, and it’s a topic that merits discussion.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"

Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A

by ElliotMatheny on Mar 16, 2010 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Zuffa isn’t afraid of what SF is today but what they might become. Their product becomes a little less valuable of a similar product is offered to the consumer free of charge. If the current growth trend continues, SF will be able cut into PPV revenues if they hold free live events on the same night. Ultimately, this could lead to an agreement of each side not countering each other SF could be able to acheive their ultimate ambition of holdinig a successfull PPV. It wont come fast or easy. Zuffa will have to feel the pain of SF countering their PPV’s with a free CBS product, but atl east it is within reason that this could occur.
This would all be beneficial to us because it creates more demand for quality fighters. More money for more shows on more networks is the best way to insure that MMA will attract the best athletes in the world.

Screw analogies.

Strikeforce has unquestionably demonstrated that they are ill-equipped to put themselves in that very position. Have you been paying attention to anything that’s been going on with SF? I don’t think Strikeforce is the position of EliteXC. Just to make myself clear. But how can anyone look at their situation and make this argument? Meltzer’s number about them drawing 39% less ratings than typical CBS viewing of the same time slot is telling, and to say that that number is the least of their worries is an understatement.

Zuffa doesn’t have to worry about SF in the long run, even if Dana cares short term. The problem isn’t Zuffa counter programming the opposition. The problem is 2nd tier organizations that think they can be major players in the industry by signing a big name here and there while doing nothing to accommodate growth.

It’s getting tiresome watching people over and over again point the finger at who they think is the big bad wolf in this situation (Dana). Yes, Dana is being shrewd when he counter programs, but these problems are not the cause. Obituary after obituary of some random MMA org reveals that this industry is incapable of supporting the type of competition that aims to be in Zuffa’s seat out the gate. Strikeforce has cornered themselves with bad policy and an M-1 partnership that is looking less and less attractive by the minute…Zuffa is just the kid that’s pointing and laughing.

by David Castillo on Mar 16, 2010 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

So, your point is that SF is doomed to failure and a little extra shove from Zuffa is meaningless in the long run?? SF certainly has their work cut out for them in terms of putting on more shows to accomodate their growing roster of fighters. My point is that I believe they have competent leadership and if they make it threw this pivotal time of growth it can benefit the sport tremendously. It already has benefited the sport. Just listen to what viirtually ALL of thefighters say. They are happy that SF is showing signs of success and possibly breaking out fo their “shell” a little bit. I dont fault Zuffa for doing what they are doing but I think it’s important to acknowledge the reality that their interests (in this respect) are different from mine, most viewers, and virtually all professional fighters.

by naturalist on Mar 16, 2010 3:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

The UFC could put together Sam Stout vs. Joe Lauzon II as a main event, and they would still win.

I highly doubt that. If CBS actually puts together a decent marketing campaign, they could honestly blow the UFC out of the water. Think about how well Fedor’s network TV debut did, and then consider how much everyone was bitching about the shitty job they did advertising for the event; imagine if they actually did a good job of advertising the fights.

Seriously, the thing sells itself- 3 titles on the line, 5 world ranked competitors, etc. etc.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"

Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A

by ElliotMatheny on Mar 15, 2010 11:03 PM EDT reply actions  

You missed the point completely.

In what way would SF “blow the UFC out of the water” by doing better than a card that Zuffa puts together for peanuts? Especially where SF requires 90% of their meaningful roster?

In terms of money, it’s a wash. SF card with 3 titles on the line = high risk/better damn sure be high reward. UFC card = low risk/decent reward for a couple of fighters that will never contend for a spot in the top 10.

by David Castillo on Mar 16, 2010 1:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm just saying

Nobody is going to watch Stout/ Lauzon II. Or any other shitty card like that, you’re overestimating the brand power of the UFC, and underestimating the ability of CBS to deliver viewers.

Even if the UFC busted out Serra/ Swick (the best they can come up with, and still a very poor main event) it wouldn’t put up anywhere near the numbers of SF’s card. Why even waste their time? They might as well just put up UFC 109 for free or something. There’s no real reward for throwing together a half- assed card at the last minute, I think UFC4 put it exactly right when he said it was just a ploy to try and scare Coker

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA. Xtreme Couture- "The Best Never Rest!"

Go Gonzaga! G-O-N-Z-A-G-A

by ElliotMatheny on Mar 16, 2010 2:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Fedor card did not do that well. The main event did well, but overall it was not seen as a real success. The numbers were not bad, but they were not enough to secure a regular CBS deal for SF.

Stout/Lauzon obviously could not beat it, but a legit semi-big bout? It might well do it.

And Serra/Swick was never going to be the main event. It was reported as being a co-main event, or #2 bout. I know that Wand/Akiyama was looked at as well. Wand on Spike could do solid numbers and would draw from SF.

But as I said, direct competition tends to result in all parties stepping up their game.

by Lynchman on Mar 16, 2010 3:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually you’re underestimating the UFC’s brand power, the UFC can easily put on a card featuring several TUF names and get a good rating on Spike while at the same time hurting SF and their ratings. In the end their strenght lies in the fact that they have a built in audience that only knows and only cares about their fighters there is no risk when it comes to counterprogramming when you’re the top dog. Basically it’s all about what the UFC wants to do, if they want to kill you they will but Dana usually prefers the slow death method of destroying mma orgs because as we’ve seen sooner or later they end up hanging themselves he just gives them the rope.

by Raker on Mar 16, 2010 3:12 AM EDT reply actions  

there are two issues raised by many of you here.

One, that SF could counter program the UFC and someone even mentioned a move into PPV way down the road, which ought to scare everybody. How many of you want to start paying for two PPVs a month just to see all the fights you want to? I’m guessing just about nobody, especially given the tight situations we are already facing. I know I only want to have to tune into one place and pay one time to see all the best fighters, and that is the sole reason I do not want strikeforce becoming a big thing.

This isnt Zuffa fanboyism, I am for the UFC because that is where 4 of the 5 world titles are. And while I am in the boat that believes Lesnar would manhandle Fedor before taking him down and smashing his face with lunch box hands, I do agree that the worlds best heavyweight for the time being lies outside the UFC. Not to get into Fedor, but when the best fight the best, that is when titles change hands, and until fedor and lesnar fight, the title rightfully is in fedors hands. Anyways, my point is, 4 of the 5 actual meaningful titles are in the UFC.

Lets be totally obvious and logical here and conclude that if thats where the meaningful titles are, and that is where the greates depth of talent lies, and that is where the LW, WW, MW, and LHW chapions of the world are, then why do we need a SF to take away from that?

I want to see the handful of SF fighters that are of UFC quality folded into the organization for the benefit of the FAN, not Zuffa.

We as fans deserve to see the best fight the best, and we cannot do that with 2 competing major promotions. It isnt fair to any fan, not to mention the cost issue of two PPV promotions. Thats another reason I am absolutely against WEC going PPV. nobody can afford that many shows a month! I’d pay 9.99 for WEC, not 49.99, the same as the UFC big leagues price. I don’t mean to take away from the little guys, they are more than often the most exciting to watch, the quickest, they don’t tire, its nonstop action….but thats a whole different thread….

Bottom line. To know who is the best we have to watch the best fight the best and we cannot do that with two major promotions competing with one another. And that is a crime against MMA, and surely a crime against the paying fans.

by Opposites Attack on Mar 18, 2010 1:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I feel ya, but the UFC is unable or unwilling to give the fan the number of events that we desire. If they did then they would be squeezing out the Bellator’s and SF’s. Since the UFC isn’t going to be holding 4 events a month anytmie soon there is going to be "competing " promotions. The current status is actually pretty damn good. As you said the UFC has 3 out of 4 titles ( soon to be 4 of 4 if Fedor doesn’t stay busy with top 10 competition) We shouldn’t blame SF for Fedor and M-1 not wanting to face the best.
I think things will continue to play out just fine for us with SF playing a solid # 2. The best in SF will eventually go to the UFC cause that’s where the money is. We the fan will get more free quality content than we otherwise would if SF was not in existence. Let’s just be a lil more patient and we’ll see the benefits of having a strong # 2 providing great free content and cultivating more quality fighters.

by naturalist on Mar 18, 2010 4:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D
Obp_small
Nick Diaz - The Musical
Gonzo_fist_small
Random Nick Diaz Shops
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s hope of stadium show in Sao Paulo appears to be dead
My_avy_small
Roger Gracie signs with the UFC

Recent FanPosts

Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support
Warrior_small
MMA Transaction Wire: February 4-10
Bv_small
BE Trivia Night
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
Small
Pot can be a performance enhancer (serious thread)
Nate-diaz-double-bird_small
How Would Today's Top Kickboxers Do In MMA?
Ri_small
How does the PRIDE compare to present day UFC?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings