Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Could Strikeforce in May Be the Most Packed Heavyweight Card Since PRIDE With Fedor Emelianenko, Alistair Overeem and a Former UFC Champ, Andrei Arlovski?

Is Strikeforce aiming to re-create PRIDE's glory days in the heavyweight division?

With the announcement of the signing of Andrei Arlovski to Strikeforce -- the number #11 heavyweight in the USAT/SBN Consensus MMA Rankings -- and his expected fight against #17 Antonio Silva has Strikeforce laid the first brick in what could become the biggest wall of heavyweight fights on a single card since a PRIDE Open GP. Both fighters are coming off losses, two in Arlovski's case but both are still respected and considered to be formidable contenders.

#9 Alistair Overeem vs #8 Brett Rogers is a solid second layer to the event. It won't be a title fight (lame), but Overeem needs a build-up fight and to get some exposure with the Strikeforce audience. If he walks through the formidable Brett Rogers -- a man who annihilated a former UFC champ in 22 seconds and gave Fedor quite a bit of trouble -- Overeem will have earned his place in the USAT/SBN Consensus MMA Rannkings heavyweight top ten. 

And if they manage to get Fedor on the card, his fight against #10 Fabricio Werdum will be a fight worth seeing and a legitimate title fight in any promotion. 

In fact you might say Strikeforce is attempting, as Affliction did before it, to beat the UFC in the same division where PRIDE famously dominated for most of the past decade. 

But before I get all misty eyed, the UFC today with its stacked and compelling heavyweight division might just be better than anything PRIDE ever did, as BE fanposter DavidAC wrote in his excellent FanPost:

Personally I think a lot of this misses the real narrative: the barometer for success is being raised. It's an obvious enough point I guess, but sometimes I suspect people still don't get it. There's a level of nostalgia surrounding the old hunting grounds known as Pride that reveals the fanboy in us all, but that fanboy sometimes looks less like a sucker for the past, and more like the Star Wars geek who is 40 years old, and ignored the social joys of being next to a living breathing female in order to rebuild his bed in the shape of the Death Star.

This, to me, was the real story of UFC 110: that the future is now. Watching icons of the past like Nog, Wand, and Mirko struggle all at once simply made it more obvious.

...

It's not that I don't appreciate Pride. It was a great organization. I missed (literally) the Sakuraba years, but became well acquainted with it in 2002, mostly through online results. And yes, like all good MMA, loved it. But I never felt the need to romanticize Pride, like some do. I get the sense that for some observers, both professional and non, Pride was as good as it got: the equivalent of the Ali era in HW boxing, or something incredibly stupid. 

...

This not to say that MMA as is good as it will get, and the sport is not without its many problems. But like it or not, if there is such a thing as an MMA "golden era", we're a hell of a lot closer to that now than we ever were.

I think he's right, needlessly insulting to the greatness that was PRIDE, but still right.

And sadly, no matter how stacked Strikeforce's May card is, the UFC heavyweight division has more up and comers in Carwin, Velasquez, Dos Santos, Duffee and yes, Brock Lesnar than Strikeforce does. In fact, other than potentially Alistair Overeem, there is no one on a real career upswing in Strikeforce's heavyweight division.

But that doesn't mean that they haven't inadvertently done an excellent job of hyping up this card because of all the mystery and confusion and yes, controversy, about who will be fighting on it.

I've bitched about Strikeforce's poor PR practices in the past, but they appear to be pulling off something that us communications professionals call "the rolling clusterfuck" in which a company or individual creates a seemingly endless series of controversies and in the end, only gains profitable notoriety from the hubbub. Paris Hilton is the past master of the form. 

So in sum: Strikeforce is putting together the most stacked heavyweight card in MMA since the heyday of PRIDE, but it doesn't matter because the UFC's heavyweight division is so incredibly stacked that it shames Strikeforce's older roster, and yet, Strikeforce is doing very well for themselves by generating this much controversy whether inadvertent or not. 

Strikeforce on Showtime in May coverage

Comment 284 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

nah, rogers didn’t annihalate arlovski in :08, that’s what the ufc record was, held by don frye + james irvin, before todd duffee broke it, rogers vs. arlovski took :22

by kanodogg on Mar 1, 2010 10:35 PM EST reply actions  

Let’s be honest.

The real UFC record belongs to Bang Ludwig, regardless of what the official records indicate.

by Steve4192 on Mar 1, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

just realized goulet has had a looong layoff

by brooksto on Mar 1, 2010 11:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Pretty sure this incident had something to do with it

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 12:00 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Quick, staring contest……..you win, you always do.

by ufc4 on Mar 2, 2010 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Goddam!

3 seconds for Bang Ludwig! I keep fprgetting abot that one. Amazing!

certified warlord

by kenpoboy67 on Mar 2, 2010 7:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Nate, you need to correct the time you put for Rogers knocking out Arlovski, it was :22, not :08.

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 10:36 PM EST reply actions  

Despite showing the UFC HW dvision a little love, Nate seems to have a chubby for all things not UFC related.

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 10:36 PM EST reply actions  

He'll get blasted no matter what, what does it matter.

Without pain, without sacrifice, we would have nothing.

by lowellthehammer on Mar 1, 2010 10:42 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Pretty much.

Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"

by Blackout612 on Mar 1, 2010 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Just for the record, I am not trying to blast anyone, just stating my opinion. Reading Nate’s posts, I feel there is an Anti-Dana White, maybe down with the UFC sentiment from Nate. Could be wrong.

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 10:39 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Must be this part

“Strikeforce is putting together the most stacked heavyweight card in MMA since the heyday of PRIDE, but it doesn’t matter because the UFC’s heavyweight division is so incredibly stacked that it shames Strikeforce’s older roster”

by ufc4 on Mar 1, 2010 10:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

If anything the Pride fanboys should be the ones taking offense.

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

It was a joke Anton, check your sarcasm detector.

by ufc4 on Mar 1, 2010 11:10 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Anton, this entire site is anti-Dana/UFC. Don’t you know this?!

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m flagging for inappropriate!

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

well what about you Anton?! WHO BANS YOU!

ALSO

i’m gonna be having dinner with geoff on monday, i’ll give his gaptooth self a high five for you.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:16 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m gonna tell him “i missed your gaptooth”.

also

going to be living with eyeball records. gonna be epic.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

next time you're on the east coast

hangout…considering we’ll be having backyard shows and stuff all summer.

also if you like glassjaw check out eyeballs new band jacobi wichita.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

rad, I’m having them and Astronautalis play a show on monday. I’ll try and get video for you dude.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

awesome

so what do you do for them exactly? are you with eyeball?

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 1, 2010 11:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Alex is one of my really close friends, used to work for them, now I just help out with putting bands up and getting them shows. But Alex wants to move down to the shore so I’m getting a house with him.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:58 PM EST up reply actions  

dude, i sent your info to the presidents of the clubs. it may take awhile for the turnover, considering we just recently had officer elections after new members were let in

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 12:01 AM EST up reply actions  

hey no worries man, I’m gonna be there for the show at that one club anyways if you wanna meet up for a beer.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 2, 2010 12:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Terrace is the only real Alt place around

They’re gonna hook your band up with a bunch of ganja and a case of Stella Artois.

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

After all the horrible thins I say about Fishbob and I’m still here?

Wait until the week before the fight; it’s going to be biblical.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

whats with the fishbob? i don’t get it.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh man the Fishbob. Its only the best nickname ever. (albeit with some vague racial overtones)

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Racial, how?

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Calling a Filipino a fish because of his eyes. I think you would have to be either from the USA or the Philipines and be extremely sensitive to see anything wrong with it though.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I just think he looks a bit like a fish because of his quasi lazy bugeyes and the shape of his mouth.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I don’t think its racist at all. I just think somebody extremely sensitive could find it racist, but fuck them anyways. Sorry for bringing it up.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah sometimes I over think things like this. Sorry for mentioning it.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Fishbob’s so lame even his car doesn’t start for 14:52.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Did we break rule #1 earlier? I see our comments got removed.

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL, probably so, I’m always breaking some kind of rule yet they still let me stick around.

by ufc4 on Mar 1, 2010 11:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Is that your first banning? Your parents must be so proud…sniff

New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Mar 1, 2010 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

He broke his cherry!

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

haha. no actually.

I just don’t say it here. But this guy just told us to Lick his balls. so…

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 1, 2010 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve only been coming to this site for the past year or so, so alot of the stuff I read from him seems to have a bit of bias against UFC. I am not going to go dig to see all that he has written positive for UFC, I am just simply stating an opinion. If you don’t like, lick my balls.

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 10:51 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Prepare to get rule 4'd

Without pain, without sacrifice, we would have nothing.

by lowellthehammer on Mar 1, 2010 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t really give a shit. i like reading the posts here and catching up on current news, but if I cant come in and post my opinion then fuck it.

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

You can express your opinion if you do it well. “Lick my balls” doesn’t qualify.

New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Mar 1, 2010 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Lick my balls really isn’t an opinion, more like a request. My opinion is stated in a different post.

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 10:57 PM EST up reply actions  

this is getting gnarly

what’s with the aggression man?

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

No aggression, just bad language.

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

try not to be so aggro…it’s just a sport.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Sir, again, no aggression.

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

okay no worries…can you mail me some lonestar or shiner bock?

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Is shipping beer legal?

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

i hope so…shiner bock is delicious.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Enjoying a shiner bock right now

rec’d for good taste in beer. I seriously think this is going to be one of the things I miss most about Texas when I move out of this place.

by Shaun32887 on Mar 2, 2010 1:59 AM EST up reply actions  

“Lick my balls” gives rhetorical context on how to understand your position. It counts.

New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Mar 1, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I am done talking about my balls….

"Call that Amber Lamps"

by DallasMMAFan on Mar 1, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

As long as Dana White is not a fighter:

he’s a fucking douchebag assface who abuses HGH and juice and can eat my nuts.

UFC, however, is the best promotion on earth and I love it.

BOOSH

by Farthammer on Mar 1, 2010 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Not that I condone facism or any ism for that matter. Isms are in my opinion, not good. A person shouldn't believe in an ism, he should believe in himself.

I quote John Lennon, "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me". Good point there, after all he was the walrus. I could be the walrus. Wouldn't change the fact I have to bum rides off of people.

by Sam Cupitt on Mar 2, 2010 12:24 AM EST up reply actions  

I rec’d cause you spelled his name out.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 2, 2010 12:28 AM EST up reply actions  

And I didn’t even look it up!

by ufc4 on Mar 2, 2010 7:36 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Maybe some time away from BE would do you good...

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably so.....

……..not gonna happen…..

by ufc4 on Mar 2, 2010 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL

So can Lesnar and Tank Abbott.. lol

And probably a few more fighters as well..

8-29-09

Keith Jardine is now known as "The Dean of Antihistamine" because he is always sleeping early in fights..

by MMAuthority on Mar 2, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Ah, I always wondered how you justifies you bias to yourself, Nate

Pretty much the exact same thinking as Bill O’Reilly, and the rest of Fox News: pretending everyone else is biased in the other direction, so their shoddy reporting is actually heroic in some way. Brilliant reasoning there, bias is better than balance. You renegade you.

by theplague on Mar 2, 2010 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

everyone needs to chill out.

Now I was proudly calling Nate all sorts of different words for stupid when there was the whole josh gross/copromotion ridculousness and arguing over nonsense when the UFC “lost all their momentum” during the biggest injury drought they’ve ever had, but where the fuck have you guys been since then?

nate was giving it to Strikeforce just as hard for the last week or two when they disappeared off the face of the earth, or when they were pulling jabroni’s out of their asses to fight lashley and walker on 36 hours notice. just as hard as he was giving it to the UFC a month ago.

by Phildo on Mar 2, 2010 12:36 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I guess you never heard the expression “speaking truth to power”.

by John Nash on Mar 2, 2010 12:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Cannon Jacques

Back with a vengeance

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 1:09 AM EST up reply actions  

When I see “fawning bootlickers” whining, I know I’m doing something right.

by theplague on Mar 2, 2010 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

likewise

Dana has many more fawning bootlickers than I do and most of them are in the press.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Mar 2, 2010 8:55 AM EST up reply actions  

gosh Nate, writing a story about a card that would feature three meaningful heavyweight bouts, something we haven’t seen in the division that conventional wisdom says is the most important in combat sports…how biased are you?

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Mar 1, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I completely agree, but this post doesn’t really seem to be an example of that sentiment.

by theplague on Mar 1, 2010 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I feel the same way, and it seems to be almost every post by nate is anti-ZUFFA

I don’t post here on a regular basis, mostly lurking. But in my opinion, from what I’ve read this dude has an agenda. Not sure if the UFC turned down his application for a job or if Dana spit in his gravy or what, but it’s borderline laughable. With this whole Strikeforce/M1/Fedor clusterfuck going on, he takes time to post this drivel speculating that SF is putting on the greatest HW card since Pride. Well first name the best Pride HW card for reference purposes. Then tell me, after all we’ve seen with the downward slope in both skill and competition of these famously mythical Pride HW’s since coming to the States i.e. CroCop, BigNog…, and the upward influx of new top tier talent the UFC seems to keep pulling out of their asses, tell me how the fuck is anything Strikeforce putting on capable of being compared to anything the UFC has done with their HW div. since we all stopped calling it a joke? SF has the guy Fedor(the best) beat fighting the guy who is SF’s HW champ(who has never defended) and its not even for a title. Long story short, I think someone needs to rethink posting bullshit before the readers have a chance to call him out on it.

"Pure as we begin
Here we have a stone
Throw to stay the stranger
Swore to crush his bones
Move by will alone "

by mr.bungle on Mar 2, 2010 1:19 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Stop being so offended

but for one of your references:

Critical Countdown Absolute

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 1:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I think you missed the point...

Nate says UFC has by far a better HW division.. but the UFC doesn’t put all of it’s HW eggs in one basket (or one card, if you suck at comprehension)…

If you put down your “Nate iz anti zuffa!” pitchfork, you may understand the point in all of this.

So in sum: Strikeforce is putting together the most stacked heavyweight card in MMA since the heyday of PRIDE, but it doesn’t matter because the UFC’s heavyweight division is so incredibly stacked that it shames Strikeforce’s older roster, and yet, Strikeforce is doing very well for themselves by generating this much controversy whether inadvertent or not.

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 2, 2010 4:52 AM EST up reply actions  

It is worth noting that that line is tucked into the end of the article with the headline “MOST PACKED HEAVYWEIGHT CARD SINCE PRIDE” in the big bold letters ;)

by Jason H. on Mar 2, 2010 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Selective reading?

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Mar 2, 2010 5:26 AM EST up reply actions  

very much so

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha ha.

Revelation of the Day: Communications professionals have termed a strategy (or tactic or something else, not sure) in their field of expertise “the rolling clusterfuck.” Now that’s professional. Good stuff.

by Cannon Jacques on Mar 1, 2010 10:40 PM EST reply actions  

Gotta say

It’s nice to see you posting more often lately.

Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"

by Blackout612 on Mar 1, 2010 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I appreciate that.

When I’ve got some time, I like to shoot the shit around these parts. Maybe, I can help keep the trolls suppressed a bit.

by Cannon Jacques on Mar 1, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

That would be welcome (since they won’t let me weild the anti-troll hammer).

"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."

by AJB on Mar 2, 2010 2:18 AM EST up reply actions  

FUN

PRIDE and Strikeforce may not have the most respected matches ever but DAMN the fight are/will be FUN!!!

These are good fights on paper.

Screw records or rankings or whatever…

I just can’t wait to scream at my TV…..or hopefully SCREAM LIVE from the event itself!

by ADAMantium on Mar 1, 2010 10:41 PM EST reply actions  

Sure if we all jump into a time machine and go back to 2005.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 10:41 PM EST reply actions  

Brock vs Mir/Carwin and Cain vs dos Santos all on the same card would blow this Strikeforce thing the fuck out of the water.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

even the canseco v walker fight...

feels like some old PRIDE shit…

who cares…

Strikeforce should just give us crazy fights and make magic happen!

by ADAMantium on Mar 1, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Canseco/Walker isn’t magic, it’s a travesty.

by Worldisart on Mar 2, 2010 12:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Pretty sure Rogers was working at Sam’s Club in 2005 and Overeem was losing to Nogueira and Shogun at 205.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Was there even a Sam’s club in 05?

I think Rogers was fighting a guys who fought in shirts at that time.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

You have to start somewhere

besides he has since Up’d his comp since those days, i mean at least the guy takes tough fights.

by TheBiggertheyare... on Mar 1, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Totally.

At some point, every heavyweight with more than 8 fights has fought someone with a shirt on.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m excited for a ton of heavyweight fights over the next four months, and even into the Summer. Where Fedor fits into all of this will be the key to whether or not what SF is doing at heavyweight is truly relevant. While Rogers/Overeem is an awesome, awesome fight, the non-title fight portion of it (for partly obvious reasons) is a kick in the dick. Not a fan of that at all.

Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"

by Blackout612 on Mar 1, 2010 10:45 PM EST reply actions  

At the same time, if you make it a title fight, it’s still a kick in the dick because Rogers is coming off a loss.

by Worldisart on Mar 2, 2010 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Not saying it should be

I understand why it’s not, but maybe that means Overeem should be fighting someone else.

Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"

by Blackout612 on Mar 2, 2010 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

If it’s true, I’m just happy he’s fighting someone of higher quality than James Thompson.

by Worldisart on Mar 2, 2010 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

Not complaining about the fight itself, just that it sucks we still won’t be seeing a SF HW title fight for a while.

Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"

by Blackout612 on Mar 2, 2010 12:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Overeem/Rogers makes no sense to me.

Have Rogers fight Overeem (the champ) right after he got KO’d by Fedor?

by HappyLittleTreez on Mar 1, 2010 10:48 PM EST reply actions  

Well the natural fight is Fedor

but he won’t fight. Since they have something like 6 HW fighters they need to do something

by SES 84 on Mar 2, 2010 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I still think it'll be an awesome fight.

Just wish it made a little more sense.

I’d like to see Rogers get the KO but then we’d have to see Fedor/Rogers II.

by HappyLittleTreez on Mar 2, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

If CroCop Rothwell gets on that vs card

It would be a close second.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 10:53 PM EST reply actions  

Overeem is fighting Barry at 114 or 115.

by Worldisart on Mar 2, 2010 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Bah, I meant CroCop, go me!

by Worldisart on Mar 2, 2010 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Strikeforce should go for exciting rather than critical acclaim…

what i mean is, if you get too many fights where everything is on the line, we can tend to see some lay and pray and other stalling or no one wants to push it…

if SF can just put on fights like the Lawler/Manhoef that the hardcore fans love or just some crazy freak show like walker v canseco then i’ll grab a seat and snack on some popcorn…

by ADAMantium on Mar 1, 2010 10:54 PM EST reply actions  

Most people here on BE are big time MMA fans, and with Strikeforce’s roster, most will watch it because it is free despite greatly criticizing the product. Strikeforce just very recently became a national product, and they go by a business model that involves getting ratings and pleasing the networks, not us the niche audience.They need to have fights that’ll garner ratings like a Herschel Walker fight because it will get eyeballs to what is a relatively new national product. However, maybe that fan who just came to watch Walker will watch the rest of the card and become fans of the quality fighters on it. Strikeforce, at this point, should go for more exciting because they need to garner ratings, build an audience for their product and brandname, and please the networks.

by chrisbboy82 on Mar 2, 2010 12:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Hey, it’s days if not weeks of fun bashing that one Herschel Walker fight on the Strikeforce card and pretending it’s the start of MMA apocalypse.

by bignerd on Mar 2, 2010 3:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, obviously there is no comparison between the depth of talent in any Strikeforce division compared to that of the UFC., but luckily for Strikeforce there doesn’t have to be to have just as relevant and meaningful fights in the – whatever you call it -as those in the Octagon. That’s because Strikeforce is running 1/2 the fights over the year as the UFC, which means they only have to 1/2 the number of top HW to have just as many world class bouts as the UFC. Is #1 vs #10, or #7 vs #9, or #12 vs #15 any worse than #3 vs 8, #4 vs #6 or #8 vs #14?

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 10:54 PM EST reply actions  

Strikeforcee in April aint so bad either

Hendo vs Shields
Mousasi vs King Mo
Aoki vs Melendez

by Jmend255 on Mar 1, 2010 10:54 PM EST reply actions  

Honestly more excited by this card tbh, these are all guys who are ascending, not fading

by Jason H. on Mar 2, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Suddenly championship belts are meaningless to some.

Miai vs. Anderson cause a shit storm but the Overeem/Rogers non-title gets “who cares” from some . ahaha.

by snakecharmer1340 on Mar 1, 2010 10:56 PM EST reply actions  

I don’t think many people really care that Overeem has the belt. The real Strikeforce champ gets crowned when Fedor meets Overeem.

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

What if Rogers knocks out Overeem though?

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I will run naked through the streets.

New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Mar 1, 2010 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

In that case.....

Come on Overeem!!!

"I hope he tries to stand with me. That'd be great, I'd love it." - Heath Herring UFC 87 pre-fight interview.

by Earl Montclair on Mar 1, 2010 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

What if….

Rogers knocks out Overeem and Fedor can’t get his contract issues worked with Strikeforce. He leaves. Strikeforce is fucked.

by snakecharmer1340 on Mar 1, 2010 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Rogers gets a big fat UFC contract, lives happily ever after.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Than whenever Fedor fights again. Really the claim to fame in Strikeforce at HW is beating Fedor, not holding a belt.

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

right but overeem is the HW champ…if he loses in a non title fight to rogers who was just knocked dead by fedor then do you make a rogers/fedor rematch for the belt?

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually I think I would schedule a Fedor/Rogers rematch and put Arlovski or Barnett against Overeem with the hopes they would beat him. Now Fedor vs one of those two would be for the belt.

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 11:10 PM EST up reply actions  

How is that remotely fair to Rogers? Rather than having a brief shining moment where he could lay claim to being the champ, he’ll just get knocked on his ass by Fedor again.

by Worldisart on Mar 2, 2010 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

can you wear Fedor around your waist if you win? haha

by snakecharmer1340 on Mar 1, 2010 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

No, but you are allowed to wear a spiffy sweater.

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

imagine Fedor in a trophy case.

by snakecharmer1340 on Mar 1, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

haha. Vladim keeps Fedor in his trophy case hahaha.

by snakecharmer1340 on Mar 1, 2010 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Recd

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Vadim’s house:

Fedor’s house:

by ufc4 on Mar 2, 2010 12:17 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

We get to see an entertaining fight, Overeem will probably never fight in the US again and will be stripped of the title. And then also what Uber said.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Well there’s a bit of a difference between a UFC championship belt and a belt that for all intents and purposes doesn’t even exist.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

So if you hold the UFC belt, it means something compared to holding the Strikeforce belt?

by snakecharmer1340 on Mar 1, 2010 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously. I don’t think anybody would argue that a UFC belt isn’t a bigger deal than a Strikeforce championship.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

the strikeforce belt is meaningless.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:06 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

your absolutly right,these fights are being put on just for the sake of entertainment.they mean nothing.Fedor doesnt want the belt obviously because of the champion clause.M1 wont be happy until they destroy everyone,their already trying to redo his contract.after this card,then what?none of these fighters status in the rankings will change.at least in the ufc wins and losses have a bearing on your future in the game.

by ohd1979 on Mar 1, 2010 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Technically all fights are put on for entertainment. And nothings perfect in the UFC either. Winning fights don’t necessarily mean you are going to move up the ladder. Nothing is a perfect meritocracy.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

that’s true as well, but I think we can agree that the UFC at least stays within the confines of rankings when giving title shots…meaning person is in the top 10.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:15 PM EST up reply actions  

when is the last time a ufc champ fought in his weight class in a non title fight?this would be like cro cop fighting brock for nothing,no title,just a fight.who does that?not every fight in the ufc has a definite meaning,but all im trying to say is at least they have a plan for most if not all of their big name fighters,they have a ladder they need to climb

by ohd1979 on Mar 1, 2010 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Lutter didn’t make weight. It was billed a title bout till Lutter missed the cut.

by MikeD32 on Mar 2, 2010 3:56 AM EST up reply actions  

The SF HW belt is scrap metal. It was awarded over 2 years ago and still hasn’t been defended. The real prestige is the Fedor “Baddest Man on the Planet” title.

Keep firing Assholes!

Blackout is always right

by Ubernoober on Mar 1, 2010 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

No that’s not what I’m saying at all. UFC belt: a big deal. Strikeforce belt: completely meaningless.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I can’t tell if you’re trolling or not…I think you are though.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 1, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

This has been said by a bunch of people

Overeem won the belt in his first fight for Strikeforce and has never defended it. Its been over two years. Since then the entire division has been revitalized. It is completely different now then it was then. The belt no longer signifies the best in the division. Its a relic from an era that no longer exists.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 1, 2010 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

On the nose

Sure glad Lesnar got his shit straightened out.

by judonerd on Mar 2, 2010 9:12 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Just one edit “The belt no longer signifies the best in the division. Its a relic from an era that no longer exists never existed.”

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 2, 2010 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Getting Fedor onto this card makes the other two matches have a lot more meaning, because then they can hopefully put some sort of spin onto these fights and get some momentum going.

An ideal situation would be to get Overeem to relinquish the belt and market the AA/Bigfoot and Overeem/Rogers fights as a HW title tournament, or find some way to spin the fights as a tournament or something to prevent them from dropping off the face of the earth after the card for a few months and cause everyone to freak out.

If Fedor isn’t on that card, it’s a bad thing because that probably means the contract issues haven’t been resolved, and it’s really hard for them to get anything going without knowing who is available.

by Phildo on Mar 1, 2010 11:15 PM EST reply actions  

This card should be on CBS, especially if Fedor is involved. That’s where I think they’re missing a great opportunity.

by Cannon Jacques on Mar 1, 2010 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

You'd think CBS would switch it up

Throw Hendo/Shields on Strikeforce and have this one for themselves

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 1, 2010 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah...

that CBS card doesn’t have any strong draws. You could argue Henderson, but I’m not so sure. People always are drawn to heavyweights, and there are some guys that have some name recognition among these big men.

by Cannon Jacques on Mar 1, 2010 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Hendo vs. Shields could be boring.

Everybody expects Hendo to ko Shields but he can be a boring wrestler.

by snakecharmer1340 on Mar 1, 2010 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know.

I think there’s a decent chance Hendo will KO Shields. I like Hendo, and I think he does go for the finish when it presents itself. It’s just that Shields is not a draw, and Henderson isn’t a really huge name in the U.S., anyway.

by Cannon Jacques on Mar 1, 2010 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Shields also isn’t going to utilize the worst gameplan ever like Bisping did.

I read somewhere else, it comes down to who shows up, “Hollywood” Henderson or “Decision” Dan?

by Worldisart on Mar 2, 2010 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Either way Dan wins.

by xfreekx on Mar 2, 2010 2:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Glad you overlooked the typo of putting Strikeforce instead of Showtime

Also, they could fairly accurately take a cue from Kid Nate and bill this as “THE GREASTEST ASSEMBLY OF HEAVYWEIGHT MIXED MARTIAL ARTISTS IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1”

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 1, 2010 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

i think putting hendo on showtime would make him very unhappy. now unhappy hendo is probably easier to deal with than unhappy crazy russians, but the difference between cbs and showtime for these fighters is huge, so i think both on CBS is a much better idea than flip flopping the cards.

I just hope they are smart enough to figure out whatever they are doing with this card before the april card, so they could take the unusual step of using the april card to promote the may card.

by Phildo on Mar 1, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh yeah

Having both on CBS would be ideal. But will CBS go for that? Granted, late spring isn’t they’re big season for sports, so they just might

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 1, 2010 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

their*

i’m on fire today

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 1, 2010 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

IF Fedor is on it I’m going to almost guarantee it is on CBS.

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

No way, I do not see them going on CBS two months in a row.

by Worldisart on Mar 2, 2010 12:51 AM EST up reply actions  

First off, I’m pretty sure they are actually planning back to back CBS cards. It’s the easiest and cheapest way to garner an audience, by building on one program while it’s still fresh in the publics mind.

Now if Fedor, Overeem, Arlovski, and Lashley (?) are all on the same card I’ll guarentee you it’s on CBS, because financially it would make no sense otherwise.

by John Nash on Mar 2, 2010 1:51 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Thanks Nate!

Appreciate you quoting my “anti-Pride screed”. Heh.

I rarely agree with you, never because I feel like you’ve argued your position poorly, but because I just don’t see eye to eye with everyone, as I’m sure you yourself are used to. Gracias on that end. I didn’t mean to insult Pride so much as meant to trace the reason for observers and fan reaction to UFC 110: seemingly more concerned for the past than optimistic for the future. Or at least that was my impression.

I actually agree with the headline. Moreover, these guys aren’t relics of the past. Overeem is as dangerous a HW there is, even if I don’t think we’ve seen enough of him against consistent HW competition to truly gauge where he’s at. It’s a hell of a fight card, but it’s difficult not to be disappointed by the fact that Fedor isn’t fighting in the UFC leaving aside the political reasons.

by David Castillo on Mar 1, 2010 11:31 PM EST reply actions  

hey thanks for posting such fine work

on our site. Please make yourself at home in the fanposts, I’d love to see more.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Mar 1, 2010 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

C'mon

Did you really write that conclusion with a straight face?

Your guys’ opinion of SF changes with the wind… best to stay away from Sherdog articles that state, “sources say”…. seems like it kinda bites you in the arse.

by bleve_ on Mar 1, 2010 11:42 PM EST reply actions  

So we should ignore articles that are “sources say” no matter how many of them there are when it is something negative about strikeforce, but we should listen to them and celebrate when they are announcing fights that could lead to potentially really good cards?

by Phildo on Mar 1, 2010 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Not necessarily,

But its generally good policy to treat all articles with “sources say” as dubious in nature, no?

As to whether, “we should listen to them and celebrate when they are announcing fights that could lead to potentially really good cards”, I think my first statement applies to that also.

by bleve_ on Mar 2, 2010 2:49 AM EST up reply actions  

no i didn't

I rarely write anything with a straight face. if I ain’t having some fun, I ain’t writing about MMA.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Mar 1, 2010 11:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough… I’m a journalism buff so the “sources say” always jumps out at me.

by bleve_ on Mar 2, 2010 2:52 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah that's definitely something to be wary of

but Loretta has a track record of backing up her anonymous sourced stories. It didn’t hurt anything that everyone here was hearing those same rumors.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Mar 2, 2010 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

The jury is still out on if those M-1/Strikeforce rumors are true. I’m go to wait until they officially announce Fedor/Werdum before I break out the champagne.

by John Nash on Mar 1, 2010 11:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Why is it that Kid Nate’s editorials always annoy the hell out of me after reading them?

by Stroma on Mar 2, 2010 12:05 AM EST reply actions  

ha

and you not only read it, but you commented on it.
ch-ching!

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Mar 2, 2010 12:06 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Haha. Laughing all the way to the bank.

The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"

by Neil Manich on Mar 2, 2010 12:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Nope.

"For your information, I would like to ask a question."
-Samuel Goldwyn

by fedorade on Mar 2, 2010 4:08 AM EST up reply actions  

not even close

You see that epic typo in the t-shirt thread? A couple others too

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec’d because I hate the Cubs.

Bolts from the Blue // "He looks like a catfish" - Nick Hardwick on Brandon Siler
Bloody Elbow // " looks like your comment violated rule #4. and it’s a heck of a rule, rule #4" - Kid Nate

by Richard Wade on Mar 2, 2010 4:11 AM EST up reply actions  

/high five

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

He must get REALLY pissed after reading Luke Thomas’ editorials.

by TLow on Mar 2, 2010 12:46 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Sick of steroid users

 I am so sick of these steroids users (Barnett, Antonio Silva, Alistair) getting one big fight after another. They should be banned from MMA. I will not tune in to watch these cheats. Strikeforce needs to stop getting behind these cheats. Of course they are having these cheats fight in a weak commission state. They wouldn’t dare try to have them fight in California because they would get busted. It is sad promoters do this. It is like Top Rank going to Texas for Pacman’s fight because they know Texas doesn’t test for steroids.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 12:09 AM EST reply actions  

As a really lazy man I love it when someone writes the reply I wanted to write.

by John Nash on Mar 2, 2010 2:31 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 3:47 AM EST up reply actions  

you failed to take into account the ridiculous fanboyism that has to be at the center of every mma discussion.

Right now everyone is going to be anti overeem because he represents Strikeforce, and because the great Vadim has labeled him as a cheater, but as soon as teh fight gets signed, half of the mma populous will change their opinion overnight.

by Phildo on Mar 2, 2010 9:09 AM EST up reply actions  

My only beef with what you said is that as far as I know, Overeem has never been tested. That leaves a lot of reason for doubt. He’s had fights scheduled to take place in the US and always ends up having a reason to pull out. It just allows for the discussion to continue. He’s also basically mocked the whole discussion by wearing shirts that say “got spinach” and claiming his mass increase was because of horse meat.

My personal feeling? 80% of athletes take some sort of PED and just know how to cycle properly to piss clean. And PED is anything from a steroid to growth hormone to just regular drugs as far as I’m concerned. If a person who smokes pot everyday can pass a drug test to get hired by a major corporation, there is no doubt that these athletes can do the same with their cycles.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 2, 2010 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

didn’t he pass a drug test when he fought Paul Buentello?

Everywhere I’m go, all them guys they says to me to kick for to him!
All them is hate him. I don’t know why, but no is just me, is everybady!

by Orcus on Mar 2, 2010 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

No clue…maybe? That is still 4 years ago which was before his huge muscle mass gain if he was tested.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 2, 2010 9:45 AM EST up reply actions  

he was pretty big back then already

but I’m not sure if they tested him for roids then, I’d assume they did since the fight was in the US

Everywhere I’m go, all them guys they says to me to kick for to him!
All them is hate him. I don’t know why, but no is just me, is everybady!

by Orcus on Mar 2, 2010 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

You're probably right.

But the easiest way to shut people up is to get tested and test clean. The longer you put off fighting in the US the more people will claim you’re on steroids. I mean shit, even people who test clean still get labeled as steroid users who just know how to cycle.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 2, 2010 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know the reason behind him not fighting in the US, I’m just not prepared to call him a user (of roids) just based on that. he did fight in the US before, twice to my knowledge. once against Shogun (granted he was still a LHW), and once against Buentello. If we are just going to say people know how to cycle than he should know how to cycle and still fight in the US. The bottom line is that if he is in fact a user, and people are aware how to cycle these things off, than there is no reason why he shouldn’t be fighting in the US. Furthermore, if that’s true, we should also be skeptical of every single fighter who fights in the US. If the knowledge on how to cycle off drugs is out there, than no one is in the clear.

Having said that I do wish SF would strip him though, but only on the basis of inactivity.

Everywhere I’m go, all them guys they says to me to kick for to him!
All them is hate him. I don’t know why, but no is just me, is everybady!

by Orcus on Mar 2, 2010 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly what I said before. In my opinion 80% of professional athletes take some sort of a PED. Not saying just steroids but growth hormone plus any other sort of drug that isn’t legal. In the case of Overeem, I think there would be less talk of him taking PEDs if he’d just fight somewhere that tests. FEG doesn’t test and the fights in the Netherlands don’t test either. Shit, if he fights in the US and pisses clean, you’ll still have people claiming he just knows how to cycle but it would take away some of that doubt. People like Lesnar and Carwin are just big dudes and they get lumped in with PED users.

Like I said, if a daily pot user can figure out how to pass a drug test to get hired, I’m positive these dudes can figure out how to cycle.

twitter.com/thisredengine

by Matthew Roth on Mar 2, 2010 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I can see your point, but like you said:

Shit, if he fights in the US and pisses clean, you’ll still have people claiming he just knows how to cycle but it would take away some of that doubt.

people who cries roids are still going to cry foul, there is nothing he can do to change that. Fighting in the US solely to clean his name seems absurd to me, people are still going to be skeptical of him. He should fight to defend his belt, but not really to show people he can pass a piss test.

Don’t let anger take the place of comprehension

by Orcus on Mar 2, 2010 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

There's been a lot of speculation about Carwin

since back when he was in regional circuits. Lots of locker room talk and rumors. I’m not saying anything about him, but I also won’t throw him in the “always naturally big” bus either.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Mar 2, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

And I believe Silva was eventually cleared by the CSAC.

by John Nash on Mar 2, 2010 2:29 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Hmm,
well, the quote is right in the sense that too many fans romanticize the Pride era. It was not the great golden years/best eva, even though it was great.

And I don’t see how having two heavyweight fights on a card makes it the biggest HW card since Pride HW grand prix? Esp when one is a none contender and the other isn’t even a title fight when it should be. Lame indeed.

"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't." - Jack Dempsey

by JeremyShane on Mar 2, 2010 12:20 AM EST reply actions  

If everything pans out there’s gonna be 3 HW fights- Fedor/Werdum, Overeem/Rogers, Arlovski/Silva. Odds of all 3 happening? Probably not good but that’s the card they’re working on right now.

by ufc4 on Mar 2, 2010 7:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

yea, I saw they were working on the Fedor fight too; just hadn’t seen anything saying it was final yet.

Even so; I think the Fedor fight is about the only decent one on the card, although Overeem/Rogers could be a decent fight; putting the champ in a fight he has not risk of losing his belt in is cheap IMO.

"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't." - Jack Dempsey

by JeremyShane on Mar 2, 2010 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

putting the champ in a fight he has not risk of losing his belt in is cheap IMO

Then you should probably stay away from UFC 111 and 112.

by ufc4 on Mar 2, 2010 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh, i’ll ignor ethe over the top headline and state what I feel has been a big problem with SF they keep on putting fights with the wrong fighters. Fedor should be fighting Overeem for the belt and Werdum should be fighting Rogers, you can keep AA vs. Silva is fine as the third fight.

by Raker on Mar 2, 2010 2:27 AM EST reply actions  

Steroids

 I am not a fan of steroid users in the UFC either. I call out all steroid users regardless of the promotion they are in. Can anyone honestly look at Overeem and say he isn’t on steroids? Lets be real. A lot of these fighters aren’t getting caught because they fight in places that don’t test for steroids. Look at where these fighters go to fight after getting busted or even suspicion arrises. Antonio Silva goes to Japan after getting busted. Josh Barnett goes to Japan after getting busted. Pacman goes to Texas where they don’t test for steroids. As a fan I am tired of promoters and athletic commissions insulting my intelligence. I won’t watch any of the cheats.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 2:35 AM EST reply actions  

Can you look at Lesnar and tell me he doesn't use?

Or Phil Davis? Holy shit that guy is jacked. How about Bobby Lashley? Or Cyborg? Or Manhoef? Or TODDUFFEE! Or Carwin? Or a billion other guys who test clean?

Also, use the reply button. It makes conversation easier.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Mar 2, 2010 2:38 AM EST up reply actions  

 I agree with you. I see a bunch of steroid users in the UFC also. It obvious when you look at Lesnar, Carwin, Cyborg, Manhoef, Duffee, etc. Clearly testing needs to be addressed because a lot of fighters are still getting away with it.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 3:55 AM EST up reply actions  

YEAH, why have drug tests, when you can base everything on looks? *rolls eyes * …you’d think these guys never took steroids.

Stop watching MMA then, since you don’t like watching ripped guys cause they take “steroids”, and you don’t like watching cheats… Don’t watch basketball either, lots of ripped guys cheats there. Don’t watch football, or baseball… Stay with chess, you aren’t likely to find a ripped athlete there, so they probably don’t do steroids.

Better yet, Stop trolling.

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 2, 2010 5:07 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Usually when people base steroid accusations on looks it has a lot to do with them gaining unnatural amounts of muscle over a period of time. Mcgwire is a great example of this. Same thing with Overeem, if you compare his older pictures to now it’s impossible not to come to the conclusion that he’s done steroids. Overeem says he got big from eating 8 meals a day, I’m not sure I believe this. If you could gain that much muscle by just eating more then why doesn’t everyone do it?

I’m not saying that every single guy who gets bigger is on steroids, that would be stupid.

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 5:52 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m not saying that every single guy who gets bigger is on steroids, that would be stupid.

yes, that would be… but this guy said something even worse than that. haha. He was even saying, that those who looked ripped, (even those who didn’t even grow massively) gets labeled as a cheat in his book.

…and also, Overeem gained all those muscle in what, 5 years? I’m surprised he gets more steroid accusations than Mir, who actually grew more in a few months time.

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 2, 2010 5:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Mir is definitely juicing, there is no question in my mind. As soon as I saw him at the Kongo weigh-in I knew it.

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 6:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I will hold unfounded steroid accusations,

since he only started a program for lifting weights after the Lesnar fight, and you know, since he indeed passed the drug test.

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 2, 2010 6:04 AM EST up reply actions  

People beat drug tests all the time. If I was on a jury I don’t know if I would convict him of it, but my opinion is he is on roids. I don’t know if that makes any sense…

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 6:08 AM EST up reply actions  

so basically let’s just find people guilty on pure speculations rather than evidence?

Everywhere I’m go, all them guys they says to me to kick for to him!
All them is hate him. I don’t know why, but no is just me, is everybady!

by Orcus on Mar 2, 2010 7:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Question for the mods

How is this not fighter bashing?

by argyle on Mar 2, 2010 7:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t say it negatively, I don’t even think they should be illegal. Roids take a toll on your body like every other vice, anyone who wants to fuck their body up for a few years of success should be able to do so if they choose imo.

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 7:20 AM EST up reply actions  

 I never said to “base everything on looks”. I also never said all steroid users are ripped. I am an adult with common sense that can look at Overeem and tell he is steroids.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 6:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I see a bunch of steroid users in the UFC also. It obvious when you look at Lesnar, Carwin, Cyborg, Manhoef, Duffee, etc. Clearly testing needs to be addressed because a lot of fighters are still getting away with it.

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 2, 2010 6:31 AM EST up reply actions  

That list is crazy. I don’t think everyone that is all pumped up is on ’roids. Some people are just bigger. You want to make a case for someone like Overeem who had a huge gain in a short time and seems to fight in Japan mostly, then I can at least listen without laughing. But Carwin, Lesnar and some others?? Some of those guys have been that size forever. You see Bobby Lashley and he was a wrestler in school at like 175lbs…a scrawny lookin guy and then he bulked up quick afterward. Lesnar was fighting at HW all the way back in his career. Carwin too is just a big dude that has a physical job even outside of MMA. Some people are just big, my brother is big like that and if he was training as much as them would probably be as ripped, but even with not training like they do he is still a huge guy.

"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't." - Jack Dempsey

by JeremyShane on Mar 2, 2010 7:15 AM EST up reply actions  

And dude

You can’t say “Strikeforce needs to stop getting behind these cheats. Of course they are having these cheats fight in a weak commission state.” and then act like you aren’t picking on a promotion.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Mar 2, 2010 2:39 AM EST up reply actions  

 I am not picking on a promotion. The issue that needs to be addressed is PED testing.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 3:57 AM EST up reply actions  

How about we first address the issue with mma fans making accusations when they have no proof at all and no " just looking at him" doesn’t count.

by Raker on Mar 2, 2010 4:31 AM EST reply actions  

 Many of the fighters I named have been busted for steroids so there is my proof on them. On the other fighters I am giving my opinion. This is a forum where people can give opinions.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 6:31 AM EST up reply actions  

The UFC may have the best up and comers

in Dos Santos, and company but look how they treat them compared to freak shows like Lesnar. They practically handed him the belt when they put him up against an undersized (in comparison) Couture and all he had to do was beat Heath Herring.

Now look at the new talent, JDS has knocked out 4 really good fighters and now he’s fighting another up and comer on VS. On the other hand you have Velasquez who in my mind only has 2 wins over relevant competition in line for a title shot.

I think the message the UFC is sending is to get a title shot you need to be cutting weight to make 265 or you need to have a stupid tattoo over your chest.

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 4:32 AM EST reply actions  

true JDS deserves the shot

but he said he doesnt wanna compete with nog since nog was competing for the title now that nog is out however JDS will get his shot pretty soon before the year is out im guessing

and i wouldnt say gonzaga is an up and comer at all maybe 3 years ago he was but certainly not now

and say wht u will against brock but hes destroyed everyone hes ever fought people thought he’d lose to everyone hes fought so far and hes destroyed all of them he even beat the hell outta mir in a loss

by milk72 on Mar 2, 2010 4:47 AM EST up reply actions  

When you come into a fight with 20-30 lbs on your opponent you are supposed to win.

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 4:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Sylvia only really has all of that weight because he’s so fucking tall, Brock is tall but most of his weight seems to be from steroids. Lol jk, but not really.

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 4:55 AM EST up reply actions  

an understandable claim

but hes never tested positive or been connected with steroids (although u could make the argument anyone connected to the WWE is connected with steroids)

but brock legitametly won the title, was his title shot deserving? not at all but he still beat the champ and then went on to beat the number 1 contender in a dominating fashion. i personally believe JDS has done the most to warrent a title shot over mir carwin or velasquez and id rather not see mir lesnar 3 yet since i wanna see lesnar fight someone else first

by milk72 on Mar 2, 2010 5:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know if he’s on steroids or not, it’s just my opinion. People say he just has good genes but I’m not buying that shit. I don’t care if his parents are the Cyborg couple, you don’t get to 300 lbs of muscle without roids.

I agree that he legitimately won his title, but he was supposed to win. That fight was like putting Rampage up against Kenny Florian or something equally as ridiculous in my mind. I’m totally in favor of a super-heavyweight division for guys who want to come in at like 280 lbs.

But agreed on that last bit, I’m tired of these freak show heavyweight fights. I sort of liked Mir’s game before he decided he was gonna start juicing to beat Brock. I don’t know if Carwin is on anything but he’s just not exciting to me, no technique at all is just silly. You’re not supposed to be able to win fights like that, but somehow he does.

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 5:14 AM EST up reply actions  

 I agree…I am tired of the freak show heavyweight fights. I am also not excited about Carwin.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 6:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Keep winning you'll get a title shot

Granted I’m not the one missing out on a year of endorsements and contracts from being “the champ”, but I always find the “deserve a title shot” talk a little self important. UFC is a promotion and their Job is to entertain fans on a regular and consistent basis. Given all the variables that go into the fight (PPV sales, injuries, timing) it means that you don’t always get the best matchup from a sporting perspective. Luckily though, the champ isn’t going to be able to dodge someone in the UFC. If a challenger keeps winning he’ll get his title shot in reasonable time.

Look at it this way, Serra got a freak title shot, won, and then lost it soon enough. Fitch wasn’t the UFCs cup of tea but eventually he got the title shot because he kept winning.

by SES 84 on Mar 2, 2010 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Am I wrong though? Couture came in at 220. Brock cut to 265 which means he was probably at ~275-285 lbs. That is literally like putting a LHW up against a LW.

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 5:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Sure, the weight difference is significant, but

you do know comparing the weight difference like that is making a flawed argument right?

a 10 lb (or whatever) difference for the little guys Miguel Torres, is different from a 10lb difference on Frank Mir.

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 2, 2010 5:53 AM EST up reply actions  

How is saying a 60 pound weight difference is significant a flawed argument?

by Biizz on Mar 2, 2010 5:56 AM EST up reply actions  

a 60 pound weight difference for guys weighing in at 135, like Torres, is far more significant than a 60 pound weight difference for those weighing 230+… 60 lbs over torres, means his opponent is 44% heavier, while a 60 advantage over a 230 pounder means he’s only 26% heavier.

You can’t just add/subtract the weight difference, and make that argument.

by Anton Tabuena on Mar 2, 2010 6:02 AM EST up reply actions  

rec’d for hilarity

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Mar 2, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Most stacked HW's since Pride is akin to saying "Gwen Stafini is more stacked than Kiera Knightly"

It just doesn’t matter for 3 simple reasons.

1) the UFC spreads out its Heavyweights because they can often be better draws for PPV’s.

2) The UFC has 4 other divisions with real depth so they don’t need to put all their eggs in one basket for one show

3) Werdum being #10 is a joke… put him where he really belongs and this is Fedor, a juicehead and a bunch of 2nd tiers with only Rogers likely having a career of real value in 5 years (assumes Fedor retires and Overeem disappears for 2 more years after he quickly starts to deflate like a ‘Diverticulitis Brock’ from a lack of juice.). A comparable UFC card would be Brock /Fedor vs. Kongo/Werdum ( a completely one-dimensional fighter with no chance), CroCop/Arvloski vs. Big Country/Big Foot, and Nogueira/Overeem (both unfortunately overrated at this point) vs. Dos Santos/Rogers (except DS is way better than Rogers ).

Now would this be the most stacked HW card since Pride? My answer.. Big F’n Deal! Come up with an analogy that means something!

by Stevefiji on Mar 2, 2010 4:41 AM EST reply actions  

i like having ur UFC and SF counterparts

if they would fight each other thatd be something id really pay to see

brock vs fedor
kongo vs werdum
cro cop vs arlovski
nelson vs silva
nog vs overeem
JDS vs rogers

that would be the most stacked heavyweight card in history and a bunch of real balanced fights that could go either waay

by milk72 on Mar 2, 2010 4:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Missing UFC fighters

What you could not find fights for Mir, Carwin, GG or Berry ?

by Oneman on Mar 2, 2010 6:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Mir-Lashley, there’s a bloodbath for you.

by ufc4 on Mar 2, 2010 10:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

The first sentence needs a question mark at the end. I’d actually recommend rewriting it altogether, probably as two or more sentences, if I’m being pedantic. Am I? Just because it’s an editorial doesn’t mean it has to feel like a blog.

by Postpubescent on Mar 2, 2010 4:52 AM EST reply actions  

Could Strikeforce in May Be the Most Packed Heavyweight Card Since PRIDE With Fedor Emelianenko, Alistair Overeem and a Former UFC Champ, Andrei Arlovski?

Sure, problem is most of those guys are known for losing.

The difference between SF and UFC is that the UFC could easily out stack a card with HWs…and (very importantly) so it again in a month.

We’re ALREADY sick of seeing the SAME people recycled every card from the Affliction days.

by Paradoxx on Mar 2, 2010 6:46 AM EST reply actions  

So should they just retire then yes?

by StevenGiles on Mar 2, 2010 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I really got sick of seeing the same guys on both of those cards, how redundant.

by ufc4 on Mar 2, 2010 10:46 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

They should really try something fresh and not recycled. I think a Kevin Jordan vs Wayne Cole Main Event would be great, instead of that Fedor guy again

by StevenGiles on Mar 2, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

 I agree. I am sick of these recycled fighters. I have no interest in seeing Arlovski anymore.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 9:24 AM EST reply actions  

Ah come on? It means we get to post pictures like this

watchkalibrun.com

by Zak Woods on Mar 2, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Is that a wax statue?

Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"

by Blackout612 on Mar 2, 2010 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

The only problem I see is...

This rumored card does not legitimize SF’s promotion or titles..

It’s nothing more than a “fight show”.. Sure it’s great for the shortest of attention spanned individuals looking for a fight to watch.. But how does this match making legitimize the promotion and it’s titles?

The champion hasn’t fought in almost 2 full years to defend his title. Then he gets a chance to fight and the title is on hold ? Then he is fighting a guy that is coming off a KO loss ? You have the arguably best HW fighter ever and consensus # 1 HW in MMA and he is not fighting for your title to legitimize your promotion ? If Overeem doesn’t want to defend his title, or Fedor doesn’t want to fight him for what ever reason, then what was the entire point of having either of them in your promotion ?

It makes SF as a whole look second rate in comparison. Walker is nothing more than a publicity stunt and the nostalgia wore off after his last fight. He is no Kimbo Slice .. He has no background to self promote his brand with. The viral marketing for Kimbo was in place long before he stepped into a cage for any promotion. The leg work was done.. All he had to do was show up and people would watch. Walker is old and has nothing..

I’m all for putting on fights that fans want to see.. I just think that the majority of fans would rather see substance over sauce…

8-29-09

Keith Jardine is now known as "The Dean of Antihistamine" because he is always sleeping early in fights..

by MMAuthority on Mar 2, 2010 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

 I agree…I want to see substance…not side shows.

by MMAfan4242 on Mar 2, 2010 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

SUPER HLUK TOURNAMENT!

WAR MINOWA! WAR HONG MAN CHOI!

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Mar 2, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

It would be great

if they all fought on the same card but, we wouldn’t see another HW fight for a year.

by Riney on Mar 2, 2010 3:24 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Favritegotevj9_small
An Open Letter to Nick Diaz
Tatum_small
Aristotle Knows Nick Diaz Didn't Cheat
Walshrun_small
5 Reasons I Hate MMA
Royce_09_small
Call To Nominate New Bloody Elbow Moderators
Obp_small
The Official BE UFC Drinking Game

Recent FanPosts

Logo_d__small
Roll a phat one for Nick Diaz
Cg_small
Perceptions Regarding Diaz v. Condit Decision Distorted by the Judging Chameleon
Cf_small
George Rush St. Pierre BJJ Coach Renzon Gracie Black belt John Danaher
Jules-winfield-7_small
In Defense of Nick Diaz
208730_10150164903466743_503301742_7348043_3232767_n_small
Top Five: Fights To Look Forward To
Bruce-lee-lats_small
Calling for Nick Diaz to be released makes no sense.
Afro_small
The UFC Has Been Spared Once Again...This Time by Carlos Condit

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings