Jon Fitch comments on Nate Marquardt's inability to create offense off his back against Chael Sonnen at UFC 109:
"Nate didn’t execute a game plan very well. I think the closed guard is dead in MMA right now, unless you are Demian Maia or Shinya Aoki forget about it. You are either getting up or getting on top, forget about pulling of submissions from your back nowadays. Strong wrestlers like Chael Sonnen will just pound you out all day long."
about 1 month ago
Scott Haber
71 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Big Nog might disagree. But I see his point.
http://www.twitter.com/TB_Money
by Beer Monster on Feb 8, 2010 4:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
But even Nog
I mean first Nog is almost at the Aoki Maia level, but even then in the Couture fight used guard to sweep and gain mount…I think you’ll see more of this anyway…Didn’t Ryan Hall even say a similar thing about top level grappling. Basically that you just don’t want to be on your back because you have this weight on you?
On Aoki, he also works a lot of the Rubber Guard which in its own way is a reaction to the traditional closed guard.
by SES 84 on Feb 8, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, a lot of Ryan Hall’s comments about that stuff have been taken out of context, but that was essentially part of his point. He was talking more about him personally getting away from some of the tricky guard play he’s known for and going back to basics for good top game dominance. Instead of spending so much time and energy working off your back in a physically disadvantageous position, and trying to win by being unorthodox and tricky, work on mastering the fundamental positional top game – sweep, pass guard, mount, choke.
A lot of people interpreted his statements as a prediction that the future of jiu-jitsu is all about top game, and while I don’t think that’s what he was primarily getting at, I do believe it’s very applicable to modern MMA. Working from your back is a fundamentally inferior position because you have to carry the other guy’s weight and exert more energy. When the guy on top also has greater leverage to throw strikes, and has a good enough top game to prevent the sweep or submission, it’s going to be a bad night for the bottom dude.
"I want to tell me what you see, let's go ahead and see by in the fight, what you saw, in the ring." - Tito Ortiz
by CasualMMAFan on Feb 8, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks clarifying
I agree its applicable to MMA…In MMA being on the bottom usually sucks…Even if you are a BJJ ace you’d rather be on top so working to get on top is a good idea.
by SES 84 on Feb 8, 2010 5:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Big Nog also hasn't submitted anyone off his back in nearly 4 years
and the last was Zuluzinho ;)
by Scott Haber on Feb 8, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True, Nog swept Sylvia before locking on the guillotine. Always forget that.
http://www.twitter.com/TB_Money
by Beer Monster on Feb 8, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think if he was talking to you and you gave that response he would add Big Nog to his quick example of exceptions like Maia and Aoki. Ryan Hall did talk alot about how the highest level of BJJ is evolving away from a closed guard because it relies too much on someone making a mistake rather then having moves to counter what the opponent is doing on top.
Another example is Lesnar. He’s at the top when it comes to wrestlers and he doesn’t have to be a BJJ master he just needs to know some pretty basic positions that completely neutralize any opportunity for his opponent to get a submission.
Don’t mean to bring Brock v Fedor into the discussion but if Brock got Fedor is the same position that Brett Roger’s did, on his back, brock would have smothered him and never gave him the room to swivel out for the armbar that he’s done so much.
by YoungGun on Feb 8, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like this point
Always love technical assessments of what works vs what doesn’t.
http://mixedmartialartsblogger.wordpress.com/
by KrmtDfrog on Feb 8, 2010 4:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i think fitch is right and I think this has gone unnoticed among most of us in recent years. among top class fighters i’ve only seen Maia,Aoki,Penn, and Nog be effective with their submissions from the bottom and holding off the gnp.with the rise of lesnar,gsp, sonnen.it seems like wrestling is getting another huge resurgence
sweeps will probs start being the focus of bjj practitioners in the future.
wow fitch had his very own light bulb moment lol
by justizzer on Feb 8, 2010 4:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Has Penn even been effective?
I see him on his back soo infrequently, but the last I remember was the GSP fight and he didn’t threaten with anything.
by SES 84 on Feb 8, 2010 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't remember seeing BJ ever successfully get a sub from his back
The armbar against Pulver that he just gave up on was from mount I believe, and the triangle he had in the 2nd Hughes fight seemed to come from a rubber guard transition.
by Scott Haber on Feb 8, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
You have to be the man... you have to be very, like, alpha male with her. You know? Decide what you do and everything. So, show her who's the boss, you know? - GSP
by pud333 on Feb 9, 2010 12:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
because it was slippery :)
"I fight because I can’t sing, I can’t dance, and it beats working all day. Now ask me a question that doesn’t sound so fucking stupid." – Phil Baroni
by midwestbred on Feb 8, 2010 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see what game plan Nate had at all. He was totally unprepared for Sonnen’s take down barrage. He must have been thinking it was a stand up fight.
by pwdminotauro on Feb 8, 2010 4:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe a little high on his fists after the Maia KTFO?
by Chortles on Feb 8, 2010 8:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would like to hear Fitch’s critique on how Swick gave Paulo the Brabo Choke.
by CSKit on Feb 8, 2010 4:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Swick's sub defense had anything to do with it
but rather his brain being scrambled from the punch that knocked him down.
by Scott Haber on Feb 8, 2010 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He actually had the presence of mind to get the underhook there, which was pretty smart. Thiago was just smarter by slapping on the Brabo. I don’t really think Swick did much wrong there, especially since he had just been dropped, like Scott said.
http://www.twitter.com/TB_Money
by Beer Monster on Feb 8, 2010 4:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What Swick did wrong was standup defense, not submission defense necessarily.
by Dooda on Feb 8, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dustin Hazelett is also dangerous off his back. One more name to add to the list.
by IWillPartyHard on Feb 8, 2010 4:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
True but is he good against high level wrestlers?
Giving Shogun his props. I had the fight 48-47 Machida but Shogun put up a monumental performance and I am honored to have seen it in person.
by Day Man on Feb 8, 2010 5:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Fitch makes a good point, but even the Maia’s and the Aoki’s wouldn’t want a guy like Chael on you. Certainly Hazlett isn’t going to want to be on his back with the Chael’s or the GSP’s or the Fitch’s etc.
by Dooda on Feb 8, 2010 4:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
And you could here Greg yelling a lot in the first “get up Nate, time to get up!” while in the closed guard.
by Dooda on Feb 8, 2010 4:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
ficth is bias because he is a wrestler
closed guard is not the problem, Nate was the problem. Nate almost got a submission twice off his back too. On that list Fitch had I would add paulo thiago, Mir, Nog, hazlet…basicly unless you are really good at jiu-jitsu it doesn’t work it is the practioner not the practition
by hatteras on Feb 8, 2010 4:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nate wasn't the problem, Chael was the problem.
Early in his career, Nate got lots of subs from his back, and his BJJ certainly hasn’t just gone downhill from there. He just never has experienced the smothering top control that Chael used.
by Scott Haber on Feb 8, 2010 5:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, people are saying that Nate was overrated. He isn’t, Chael just has a terrible style for most fighters. Nate has never faced that kind of wrestler. Okami never faced that kind of wrestler. Neither are over rated, we just underrated Chael.
twitter.com/thisredengine
by thisredengine on Feb 8, 2010 6:31 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
You get a Rec
Walking the line between intelligence and ignorance since 1985
@deowade
by Deo Wade on Feb 8, 2010 9:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But isn't that a style you eventually have to face?
What division doesn’t have its wrestlers…People were saying Nate was going to reign over the MW division…Well not if you have no answers for a great wrester…I mean Sonnen was 5/5 on takedowns.
by SES 84 on Feb 9, 2010 12:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, you eventually have to face it...
… but Nate never did until now. There is no longer any mystery as to what happens when Nate comes up against a wrestler like Sonnen.
You have to be the man... you have to be very, like, alpha male with her. You know? Decide what you do and everything. So, show her who's the boss, you know? - GSP
by pud333 on Feb 9, 2010 12:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fitch might be right that a strong wrestler like Chael Sonnen will make getting submissions of one’s back difficult, but Chael Sonnen the actual person still seems plenty susceptible to a good ol’ armbar from the bottom.
by JRN on Feb 8, 2010 4:53 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
And I think this applies only at the highest level. Obviously we’ve seen Carlos Condit, Nate Diaz, Amir Sadollah, etc., all sub wrestlers with armbars and triangles from the bottom in the last two years. They just weren’t fighting the top five guys. Other than that, he’s got a good point, although I’d like to see the time limit of rounds included as a factor here. The five minute round seems to favor guys who can gain top control, as opposed to a great BJJ player on his back, who needs time to set things up.
by Kwisatz Haderach on Feb 8, 2010 5:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And almost passed out in the guillotine against Nate.
Giving Shogun his props. I had the fight 48-47 Machida but Shogun put up a monumental performance and I am honored to have seen it in person.
by Day Man on Feb 8, 2010 5:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Notice the caveat, "the closed guard is dead in MMA right now".
He’s smart because he probably realizes that trends in MMA are somewhat like a pendulum. The closed guard may be “dead” in high level grappling competition and MMA momentarily, but as soon as everyone starts utilizing x-guard and inverted guard, etc. with great effect, people will start sleeping on the closed guard and the pendulum will likely swing back.
Or maybe Marquardt and others just needs to spend more time training off their back.
by mictlantechutli on Feb 8, 2010 5:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i agree with both of your assessments
i think a guy like marquradt (huge with good top game) never really spends time on his back, and his bottom game was exposed a bit.
but also the trend being that guys will start coming out with great submissions off their back again. A.silva sub’ing lutter was off his back, that was cool.
i think we still see a lot of triangles from bottom too, and like kwisatz said, alot of wrestlers still get sub’d in guys guards.
by bluejitz on Feb 8, 2010 5:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think a guy like marquradt (huge with good top game) never really spends time on his back, and his bottom game was exposed a bit.
That is what I was mentioning with my friends. The bigger and stronger a guy is the less time they spend on their back in JJ practice (wrestling ability is also a huge factor) and the less effective they become in that position. Nate would most likely have to drill from his back as a starting position to get the repetitions needed to develop a great bottom game (no doubt he does this but still gets less practice off his back than most guys who get put there during their normal rolling sessions).
Giving Shogun his props. I had the fight 48-47 Machida but Shogun put up a monumental performance and I am honored to have seen it in person.
by Day Man on Feb 8, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
this reminds me a lot of...
what happened when Josh Koscheck faced GSP. I don’t think he foresaw spending that much time on his back, if any. Just like with Koscheck then, I think Nate suffered from overconfidence in his wrestling and couldn’t imagine that his opponent could have an advantage in any one area.
by flassasin24 on Feb 8, 2010 6:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah this is a good point. Nate was still the one who came closest to getting a finish. If that fight had been five rounds, which is purely theoretical I know, Nate may have been able to turn it around and finish Chael.
by Kwisatz Haderach on Feb 8, 2010 5:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This would make more sense if I hadn’t just had Chael Sonnen tell me he was almost finished. By a submission. From the bottom.
by JonathanSnowden on Feb 8, 2010 5:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You post a lot of stuff that includes “X fighter told me” or “Y promoter talked to me”. We get it, you talk to people in the industry. You make that quite clear. But we all SAW Sonnen almost finished by the sub. Sonnen told EVERYONE that at the press conference.
And the key word is almost.
http://www.twitter.com/TB_Money
by Beer Monster on Feb 8, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m pretty sure that’s what he was referring to.
by HarmlessNinja on Feb 9, 2010 3:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You SEE fighters all the time that look like they are in a bad position. Later they will tell people they never felt like they were in trouble. Sonnen was in trouble. And he was nearly victimized by a submission from the closed guard. In fact most of his losses have come from submissions from the bottom. So how was that a bad strategy? If you are fighting Chael Sonnen, working from the bottom is the only to win.
Fitch said: “forget about pulling of submissions from your back nowadays.”
Well, against Chael Sonnen, that is horrible advice and Nate nearly proved it as many others have before.
by JonathanSnowden on Feb 9, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And he was nearly victimized by a submission from the closed guard.
sigh again: Sonnen was not victimized by any submission from the closed guard. He was victimized by a guillotine that Nate grabbed when Chael went for a takedown. If Chael was more careful with his takedowns, he would have never been victimized at all. It had nothing to do with Nate’s guard. You’re still missing the point.
by Scott Haber on Feb 9, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It had nothing to do with the guard except the inconvenient fact it can only be executed and finished from that position. Other than that….nothing.
Fitch is wrong here. Telling a fighter taking on Chael Sonnen that working off your back for subs is a bad gameplan is crazy. It is the only gameplan that has proven effective.
by JonathanSnowden on Feb 9, 2010 8:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He said closed guard..
Maybe you figure out a way to stand up and then when you do you show a semblance to takedown defense.
by SES 84 on Feb 9, 2010 11:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
His quote is right there
“You are either getting up or getting on top, forget about pulling of submissions from your back nowadays.”
Forget about pulling off submissions from your back? Against Chael Sonnen? I think that’s just bad advice and bad analysis.
by JonathanSnowden on Feb 10, 2010 9:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But he got the guillotine during the takedown
He kinda fell into closed guard as opposed to achieving a guillotine once Chael had established solid position in the guard.
by SES 84 on Feb 8, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
False
Grabbing a guillotine in a scramble and falling to your back isn’t the same as working subs from your closed guard. You missed Fitch’s point entirely.
by Scott Haber on Feb 8, 2010 5:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 6 recs
This, is a good point.
The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"
by hlebtasic on Feb 8, 2010 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It was a submission executed in the closed guard…
Fitch’s opinions are his own, but how much stock do you put in them? He may feel this way, but you’re also talking about a guy who has never scored a submission off his back. Is he really the best person to speak to this?
by JonathanSnowden on Feb 9, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ithe guillotine is a way to take advantage of takedown attempts…like knees to the face, but its not a way to work once you are taken down. You need other tools there…Tools which Nate didn’t have.
by SES 84 on Feb 9, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fitch has certainly fended off plenty of submissions when in opponents' guards
and I’m sure he has a pretty good grasp on what works, seeing as how he’s…you know…an MMA fighter.
BJ’s never scored a submission off his back either…I guess his input on on the guard is worthless as well.
Also, you’re still missing the point re: guillotines. They are not executed in the closed guard. They’re executed in scrambles or when defending takedowns and finished in the guard…big difference.
by Scott Haber on Feb 9, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's really definitional
Execute: to carry out fully : put completely into effect
It is a submission that requires the closed guard. There’s really no question a guillotine is executed in the guard.
Regardless, I understand that fighters aren’t likely to grab a guillotine out of nowhere from their back. But it still works only from the closed guard.
The larger picture is that Fitch’s point is ludicrous on its face. He says working off your back is ineffective against a wrestler like Sonnen. In fact, the majority of the people who have beaten him have done so with traditional jiu jitsu. How does that make a gameplan to work off your back against him a bad one? Traditionally, it is the only plan that works.
by JonathanSnowden on Feb 9, 2010 8:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you believe that name dropping will increase traffic to your website? Concise points and intelligent comments that bring something to the conversation would make me want to visit your website. If you believe that the hardcore readership of BE is going to follow you because you have talked to Sonnen, you apparently don’t pay attention to the audience, and I only consider myself a casual fan compared the to the average BE reader/commenter.
So far, I have never been to your website and am increasingly unlikely to ever visit due to the quality of your posts here. BTW a shameless plug is not in order, but do what you must.
by Ulf Murphy on Feb 8, 2010 6:14 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Dana White told me that name dropping is likely to increase traffic by 75%. When Randy Couture told me he agreed, it became obvious that I should use this tactic more and more frequently. It’s like Jens Pulver told me: Never give up Jonathan. One day Ulf Murphy might come to your website. It will make all the difference.
by JonathanSnowden on Feb 9, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
OK, that was funny. The rest of your comments in this discussion weren’t worth the time it took to read them, but that amused me.
I’m still not going to your website though.
by thekiltedwonder on Feb 10, 2010 9:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ironically, I was mentioning to a friend that Marquardt should have worked a different guard. The thing is that these wrestlers like Chael Sonnen really don’t seem to have any intention to pass guard, and even if Sonnen did, it seemed like Sonnen was more than content to just do more Ground n Pound. It seemed that Marquardt wanted to get a standup, but Sonnen was just posturing up from his guard pretty easily. Marquardt didn’t even threaten submissions from the bottom, nor did he seem not to even try to work an open guard or something else besides closed guard.
by chrisbboy82 on Feb 8, 2010 8:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
To be fair
Marquardt did go for a kneebar and a kimura from the bottom, so it’s not quite accurate to say he “didn’t even threaten submissions”. But then again, those two submissions are much more easily completed when you’re in a dominant position, rather than when your opponent’s in a dominant position, so he probably would have been better off going for armbars and triangles. He might have been thinking sweep with the kimura as well.
by Scott Haber on Feb 8, 2010 9:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll give you that much. And as someone who has been practicing BJJ for a year now, I know that it can be very difficult just to set something up from your back, and it would be that much harder with someone raining punches down on you. However, I still feel that Marquardt should have opened up his guard more and tried other techniques.
by chrisbboy82 on Feb 8, 2010 11:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if training with GSP was a problem
GSPs game is all about passing, usually to side control…So i wonder if he was a little to used to that.
by SES 84 on Feb 9, 2010 12:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d say Fitchs record pretty much agrees with his assesment about wrestlers in MMA.
So are these wrestlers (Sonnen and Fitch) ever going to pass guard and finish people? I hope MMA doesn’t come to just beating the other guy for 15 minutes. Yawn.
by GreenG on Feb 8, 2010 8:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Some wresters still look to pass
GSP certainly looks to move at least to side control. Hughes loved the crucifix…I don’t think its necessarily a trend.
by SES 84 on Feb 9, 2010 12:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have to say i see his point from a OFFENSIVE standpoint...
fighters are getting better at not getting caught in triangles and armbars from the bottom these days, but the gaurd can still be used very well defensively to neutralize a fighters attack. I though Bisbing in his last fight against Kang showed this beautifully.
by J_Maddux on Feb 8, 2010 9:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That is like saying “We should no longer try and strike, because fighters like Paul Daley will always knock us out. We should just pull guard repeatedly” One fight doesn’t really make a trend
Sonnen is an awesome wrestler and he completely neutralised Marquardt, I don’t think there is too much of a trend in the fight, it just illustrates how Sonnen is better at working GnP inside the guard than Marquardt is at working subs from his back
by StevenGiles on Feb 8, 2010 9:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You also can't get taken down at will
Forget Nate’s lame strategy off his back…he got put on his back WAYYY too easily for a guy who isn’t a serious guard player (aoki, maia, nog, mir)
Sonnen was 5/5 on takedowns. If you get taken down that easily you are going to lose rounds just because of “octagon control” Not to mention you don’t get many opportunities to strike.
by SES 84 on Feb 9, 2010 12:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I do think this is a trend.
My friend and I were discussing it a while ago. Thanks to the emphasis on cross training, submission defense has improved to the level that it is not enough to count on one’s BJJ credentials to submit someone if put on one’s back. As this skill disparity closes further and the thousands of hours of cage time are dissected to find a way to neutralize guard subs, the bottom game becomes more defensive and the likelihood of locking in a submission from guard falls (assuming the effort has been made by the top player to develop this defense and positional control). Setting up submissions from the guard is made even harder when punches are raining down.
Because the bottom player is working against gravity and the weight of their opponent, both grappling maneuvers and strikes are more difficult and costly in terms of energy. . What is small positional advantage in submission grappling (top vs. bottom position, in the guard) becomes magnified when two important factors of MMA are introduced: Potentially fight-ending strikes from the top and top control being favored by judges. As the sport develops and every small advantage becomes critical, this mechanical disadvantage means that, all else being equal, it is always better to be on top.
Specicifcally in regards to Sonnen vs. Marquardt, Brock Lesnar was able to neutralize Mir’s bottom game entirely, which was product of positional dominance and technique much more than size. Mir is a far better guard player than Marquardt and Sonnen has been putting a lot of effort into submission defense. I’ve seen almost all of Marquardt’s fights, and he only has two or three (IIRC) submissions off of his back in his entire career (against unknowns), the most recent of which came almost a decade ago. We already know that not all BJJ black belts are created equally so to assume he’d have a good chance of subing Sonnen did not make a lot of sense, despite Chael’s earlier losses. I felt Sonnen was a better wrestler but I still thought Marquardt would be able to stuff enough takedowns to make something happen on the feet. Chael’s win was a tribute to his relentless takedowns and BJJ-neutralizing top-control game. But I still think Anderson could sub him :P
I don’t think anyone will read this so I’ll probably make a fan post.
by HarmlessNinja on Feb 9, 2010 3:55 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I read it, and generally, I think you make a lot of good points. However I don’t think this is much of a standard test case, as I don’t know that Nate was really even working for a submission that hard, I think he just looked a bit lost, and didn’t make the switch from working his guard to just trying to get up, which I expected he’d have more success doing, and it may have worked against him that Chael was busted up pretty badly. If Chael was fresh, he may have tried harder to end the fight by working for mount, and given Nate more openings. I never expected Nate to sub Chael from his back, I just thought he’d be able to defend takedowns to a degree, and that he’d be able to get up from his back. As it was Chael kept tight to Nate in guard, and was content to just work his ground and pound. Nate just couldn’t get much space to turn his hips, and in my opinion, lost his composure once he realized he couldn’t stop the takedowns. He knew he needed to get up, but he was eating a steady diet of punches and elbows, and he couldn’t mentally get himself to stop trying to control Chael’s posture and just risk everything to get up, which was pretty clearly his only chance by the midpoint of the fight. We still see wrestlers get subbed from guard pretty often, but Chael isn’t just another good wrestler. He’s one of the best out there. And so that’s not much of a trend at all to me. It’s always been that way. The few truly elite wrestlers out there have always been tough to sub once they develop good defense against it. Hendo being a good case in point, as it took Anderson to finally tap Hendo out. Meanwhile, good wrestlers without the experience and sub defense still get caught pretty often, by good, but not elite BJJ players, see Brock Larson, C.B. Dollaway, etc. You put Maia under Chael and it’s a whole different story. To me this was more about Nate being really good everywhere, but elite nowhere. And I ate my words on this one. I thought he’d be able to stuff Chael, elude him with speed and footwork, and eventually beat him down. And I’ll agree with you on Anderson. He isn’t going to be held down and dominated positionally for more than a round, let alone five of them, whether he can slap on a triangle or not.
by Kwisatz Haderach on Feb 9, 2010 7:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess the point though is getting a bjj blackbelt isn’t good enough. You need to be really good if you want to submit a top wrestler from the bottom, also just controlling in closed guard might not be enough control to force a standup.
I’m not sure Chael has the best sub defense, but in any case Nate’s closed guard wasn’t sufficent.
Even if Nate stood up he was in awful shape though because he got put on his back so easily. Its that combination of awful takedown defense and no threat off his back that really exposed Nate to me. Granted I don’t think many people saw this coming, but Nate is going to have to make a lot of improvements before he faces another wrestler.
by SES 84 on Feb 9, 2010 9:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m basically gonna agree with you with the caveat that just as all BJJ blackbelts aren’t equal, neither are all “top wrestlers”. Being a great wrestler isn’t enough either. You’ve gotta be elite in order to dominate someone one dimensionally. And I agree that while I didn’t expect Nate to sub him, I thought he was a good enough wrestler/BJJ player to keep the fight standing for the few minutes he needed to drop Chael and pound him out.
by Kwisatz Haderach on Feb 9, 2010 11:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs








![Chael Sonnen says "I want to say hello to my brother, Yushin Okami":
"I want to say hello to my brother, Yushin through this interview. I am saddened that he returned to Japan - it feels like I parted with a close friend. Though Yushin lost against me, he came forward and asked to train with me: Is this a Japanese thing? It is admirable that he tried to learn from an opponent who defeated him. While at Team Quest in Portland, he thoroughly handled me during training. I was lucky that I managed to defeat him in our fight. I probably won't agree to a rematch with him (laughs). The one fighter whom I never want to fight again - that is Yushin Okami."
HT: mmamania.com, MMAPlanet.jp
-- photo via sherdog.com
UFC Fight Night 21: Florian vs. Gomi coverage [vs. Lucio Linhares]](http://cdn1.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/98089/20091026124400_img_7690_small.jpg)













