Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

UFC.com Announces Anderson Silva vs. Demian Maia at UFC 112

According to Heavy.com:

Very strong rumors are circulating from the West Coast that UFC middleweight Demian Maia (12-1) has been chosen as the replacement for the injured Vitor Belfort and will face Anderson Silva for the UFC middleweight title at UFC 112 in Abu Dhabi.

Sources close to the fight say the bout has been verbally agreed and will be signed shortly.

Update (by Kid Nate): I have to be skeptical that this match will happen but if it does it'll be because Abu Dhabi has no athletic commission. From the medical suspensions after UFC 109, via MMA Mania:

Demian Maia: Suspended until Aug. 6 (eyelid laceration) unless cleared early by an ophthalmologist or ocular-plastics doctor

Update (by Kid Nate): Well I'm eating my crow fresh tonight. From UFC.com:

"It’s always tough when a top fighter like Vitor Belfort has to pull out of a big title fight, but we have found a high quality replacement," said UFC President Dana White. "Top contender Chael Sonnen was not available due to injuries sustained in his fight with Nate Marquardt, so top six middleweight Demian Maia will step in to fight for the title. Maia is an Abu Dhabi grappling champion, a five-time Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu world champion, and he is 12-1 in MMA and coming off a win over Dan Miller at UFC 109. Anderson Silva vs Demian Maia will be a matchup between MMA’s best striker and MMA’s best grappler."

Unless Maia is cleared by a reputable medical specialist, I have to strongly disapprove of the UFC's decision to book a seriously injured fighter for a fight in a venue with no athletic commission.

More Bloody Elbow coverage of UFC 112

Comment 309 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Soooo disappointed.

I would rather have seen Marquardt/Silva over this.

by Razzel on Feb 12, 2010 9:04 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

It was a lose/lose situation once Belfort went out and Sonnen couldnt replace him

but if you look at it

Sonnen – Beat Marquardt but lost to Maia

Marquardt – Beat Maia but lost to Sonnen

Maia – Beat Sonnen but lost to Marquardt

I probably would have gone with Akiyama but that is me and there is a fair amount of people that think he lost to Belcher (I’m not 1 but they’re there).

As for Nate I dont see how you can justify giving anyone a title shot coming off a loss.

by bigdmmafan on Feb 12, 2010 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I Second that Motion

Marquart hands down is a more competitive and entertaining fight against A. Silva than Maia.

So what Nate lost to Sonnen. He was competitive and almost finished the fight against Chael a few times. Nevermind in Pride rules the decision might of gone to Marquart.

Come ON Zuffa! Give the fans a better fight for the belt not Silva/Leites 2. Drop this one like a bad habit. Ironic that it will be almost exactly a year from the Leities fight if Maia stays on this card against Silva. UGHHHHHH!!!!

by KillerInstinct on Feb 12, 2010 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Take a breath fellas.

A likely timeline for Anderson Silva.

Maia: NOW
Sonnen: NEXT
Belfort: AFTER

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I hate to say it for Belfort’s sake, but I don’ t honestly know if he’ll get his shot now. He might, but I don’t think its a sure thing. He was the right man at the right time, but now he’s not so much. Keep in mind Shane Carwin.

by TLow on Feb 12, 2010 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Belfort has been around for a while though.

Carwin has only been around the MMA world for a couple of years.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

True, but interest really hsa only gotten big about him in his past couple fights, with two impressive first round KOs. I hope you’re right, but right now he might be third in line for a title shot. And Hendo was ’given" the title shot after UFC 100, remember.

by TLow on Feb 12, 2010 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

The HENDO THING.

Jay Heiron is a free agent and Strikeforce is not really comitting to giving him a title shot until he signs a new contract.

Hendo’s victory at UFC 100 was his last fight on his contract. Hendo and Dana seemed to be on different pages when it cames to contract negotiations. I think that played a bigger part than people realized.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 11:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

wow I posted mine like 1 minute after you did.

The fact that new contenders emerged when Hendo was trying to negotiate hurt his cause and without a new contract, he had to know there was a 0% chance of a title shot.

by bigdmmafan on Feb 12, 2010 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

But the Hendo situation was different

Dan had to know going in there was a 0 % chance of him getting the title shot without a new contract in place.

I believe if Hendo had resigned right after 100 and Affliction:Trilogy had gone down he probably would have gotten his title shot but not resigning right away and then Trilogy getting cancelled and Belfort koing Franklin hurt his chances.

by bigdmmafan on Feb 12, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Perhaps, but I (hopefully) see Vitor make a strong recovery from surgery and have another highlight knockout of the next fool to get in the Octagon with him, then that would strengthen his case for title-shot.

by samuraisul on Feb 13, 2010 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

The thing is that the KO that Marquardt gave Maia is still pretty fresh. While Maia’s standup is improving, it is nowhere near Anderson’s level. If the fight hits the ground somehow, then it’s a different story, but getting it there is honestly hard to see.

by chrisbboy82 on Feb 13, 2010 5:07 AM EST up reply actions  

This will be a ghastly murder scene.

Walking the line between intelligence and ignorance since 1985
@deowade

by Damon O. on Feb 12, 2010 9:04 PM EST reply actions  

If Marquardt could level him in one punch, then what will Silva do…?

New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Feb 12, 2010 9:06 PM EST reply actions  

ok

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:08 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

done

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmm...so does Sonnen still get the next shot?

or maybe Sonnen vs. Belfort to determine the #1 contender?

by Scott Haber on Feb 12, 2010 9:08 PM EST reply actions  

Its still a damn good fight ...

and I dont mind. Id rather see this than have Silva not fight for another 5 months.

by Sauce on Feb 12, 2010 9:09 PM EST reply actions  

hard not to pick silva, but one takedown and this is a different fight entirely.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:10 PM EST reply actions  

I do not believe that Maia has even a remote shot at taking Andy down.

by Amsterdaam on Feb 12, 2010 9:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Why? He took down Sonnen.

by Razzel on Feb 12, 2010 9:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Because if he gets anywhere near Silva he’s gonna be eating fists left and right.

by Amsterdaam on Feb 12, 2010 9:14 PM EST up reply actions  

silva has been taken down by lesser men than maia

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

And Maia has been KTFO’d by lesser men than Silva.

by ufc4 on Feb 12, 2010 9:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

word. hard not to pick silva.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Since when is “men” a singular term?

Twitter: @FlyByKnite

by FlyByKnight on Feb 12, 2010 9:21 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

ever since brocklesnar

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

this exchange

sums the whole debacle up. If Nate hadn’t found a hole in Maia’s game in less than 3min, I could hold out hope for Demian to get it on the floor. I have no doubt that this fight end there, by way of a Silva beat down/ ko.

by dugmouth on Feb 12, 2010 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

A hole

that was Demian throwing head kicks to start a fight. He’s learned. The Marquardt fight is not evidence of how this will turn out.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Feb 12, 2010 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I really thought you were calling him an asshole

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

...

I really should have thought about that before I posted.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Feb 12, 2010 9:39 PM EST up reply actions  

In days past he has, but I don’t think it will happen now.

by Amsterdaam on Feb 12, 2010 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Carwin tweeted about this fight happening. Doesn’t mean anything but whatever.

Twitter: @FlyByKnite

by FlyByKnight on Feb 12, 2010 9:10 PM EST reply actions  

How did carwin know? That’s random

by MikeD32 on Feb 12, 2010 10:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

If this isn’t over shockingly quickly, it has the potential to take the award for most boring fight ever. It may beat out Silva vs. Leites.

by Amsterdaam on Feb 12, 2010 9:11 PM EST reply actions  

Maia has said before that he won’t ever let a fight get boring. He’s going in there to finish fights regardless of it’s him getting finished or his opponent. I don’t think he cares if he gets knocked out.

Twitter: @FlyByKnite

by FlyByKnight on Feb 12, 2010 9:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Good thing!

Perhaps my best years are gone. When there was a chance of happiness. But I wouldn't want them back. Not with the fire in me now. No, I wouldn't want them back.

by jebushchrist on Feb 12, 2010 9:14 PM EST up reply actions  

i'm not alone

in thnking this fight doesn’t make it out of rd 1.

by dugmouth on Feb 12, 2010 9:29 PM EST up reply actions  

This is MMA

We all thought that no way Sonnen would beat Mardquardt, Gonzaga would beat CroCop, Griffin would beat Shogun, etc.

by cyph on Feb 13, 2010 12:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Thought Maia was medically suspended til August 6th?

Perhaps my best years are gone. When there was a chance of happiness. But I wouldn't want them back. Not with the fire in me now. No, I wouldn't want them back.

by jebushchrist on Feb 12, 2010 9:11 PM EST reply actions  

I think the UFC normally farms international stuff to the Nevada comission.

Keep firing Assholes!

I don't know what I'm talking aboot.

by Ubernoober on Feb 12, 2010 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

The eyelid thing is freaking me out. Silva might blind Maia if things go badly.

Sure glad Lesnar got his shit straightened out.

by judonerd on Feb 13, 2010 3:22 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

This is what I thought would happen.

It sucks. But it’s a shitty situation. You can’t give someone a title shot who just got dominated for 3 rounds. (Nate) At least we’ll see two champions murder the comp that night.

by Myke25 on Feb 12, 2010 9:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

lame

1) Maia is going to butt flop just like Leites.

or

2) Silva is going to KO Maia if he stands with him.

No reason to buy PPV. I already gave you the results. Worst possible match up ever after seeing Maia get KTFO’ed by Nate.

by virginiatech on Feb 12, 2010 9:14 PM EST reply actions  

I actually disagree

Because if you remember, after the Leites fight and all the backlash. Maia insisted he would not employ that strategy.

by Razzel on Feb 12, 2010 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

ok

but like I said.. If he doesn’t butt flop.. he is going to get KTFO’ed faster then Forrest.

Maia’s stand up has improved.. but his striking is like 15% of what Anderson’s is. That’s not competitive, and I for one wouldn’t buy a card with that as a main event that is already going to be on tape-delay.

I’m calling it right now 225k PPV’s!

by virginiatech on Feb 12, 2010 9:41 PM EST up reply actions  

You do realize this card also has

Penn/Edgar
Hughes/Gracie

Besides you do realize you can order this card live you just have to do it saturday afternoon instead of saturday night.

by bigdmmafan on Feb 12, 2010 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

You’ve actually bought in to that DW koolaid? What the hell is this world coming to? You guys actually think these match ups are legit and worth your hard earned money????

Edgar is not that good, to small for LW, and his record is made of almost entirely of decision victories. Is that a match that is going to get me pumped up? No. The fucker hasn’t even secured his place for #1 contender (real one is Gray, and hes boring too), and hes getting a title shot.

Hughes vs. Gracie.. you can’t honestly think this justifies paying $50? A Matt Hughes that doesn’t really want to fight competitively anymore vs. a 41 year old guy who hasn’t looked impressive since 2006.

by virginiatech on Feb 13, 2010 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Because who really wants to see 3 of the best p4p fighters of all time on the same card...

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Anthony Pace on Feb 13, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Good Lord

Please go back to the Sherdog forums and never come back.

by SidHartman on Feb 12, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh you're witty

Care to elaborate why you’re so butt hurt? Do you want Maia to wrap his big manly legs around your torso?

by virginiatech on Feb 13, 2010 1:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Ha

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 12, 2010 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Very. Good. Point.

Didn’t think of it that way, but I like it alot. Anderson may not get hit once in this fight.

by CaptainSpaulding on Feb 13, 2010 1:25 AM EST up reply actions  

For those saying Maia is going to turn into Leites, you’re dead wrong. Maia actually respects the sport too much to let that garbage happen again.

Twitter: @FlyByKnite

by FlyByKnight on Feb 12, 2010 9:15 PM EST reply actions  

That garbage was half Anderson’s fault.

by MrJobro on Feb 13, 2010 2:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I think they chose mia over nate since Mia is coming off a win and Nate just lost. And also Mia is a bjj guy and since bjj is huge in abu dabi it works out well.IMO

by #1 piggy on Feb 12, 2010 9:15 PM EST reply actions  

Maia.. HERE IS WHY.

Maia was the 2007 ADCC Submission Wrestling World Championship which I believe is run by the guys who are co-promoting with the UFC in Abu Dhabi.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a conspiracy !

Those Iraqi’s want dem oil for themselves!

by MMAGuard on Feb 12, 2010 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I really think this is a huge factor.

by verloc on Feb 12, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you're right

Look at who they’ve lined up:
Renzo Gracie
BJ Penn
Demian Maia

Notice a trend on the main card with regards to style?

by John Nash on Feb 12, 2010 9:39 PM EST up reply actions  

He should practice this every day until the fight

by MikeD32 on Feb 12, 2010 10:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Carwin already said to look for a flying armbar when he fights Mir, so anything is possible. Lol.

Twitter: @FlyByKnite

by FlyByKnight on Feb 12, 2010 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

If that shit worked again I might laugh myself to death.

Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.

by FRANKIE on Feb 13, 2010 2:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Not bad, not bad.

Let’s remember that before Nate’s one-punch victory over Demian, there was a growing chorus of people who were of the mind that Maia’s ground game was just thing to potentially end Anderson’s reign atop the division.

Anderson’s takedown defense even remotely close to the rest of his game. If this fight somehow ends up on the ground, things could end quickly. I don’t think that will happen, but I wouldn’t exactly call it a long shot, either.

Besides, this makes it more likely that everyone will get to see the fight we wanted to: Anderson vs Chael.

I specializes in grammar fail.

by a tommy point on Feb 12, 2010 9:18 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

Exactly. I love how everyone is wanting to see Silva/Sonnen. yet no one is remembering that Maia made Chael Sonnen look like a nobody just a year ago.

by Deezle23 on Feb 12, 2010 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

“Anderson’s takedown defense isnt* even remotely close to the rest of his game.”

Bah, I no can do typing. Stupid fingers.

I specializes in grammar fail.

by a tommy point on Feb 12, 2010 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

How does it make that fight more likely? If Belfort is the #1 contender then Chael will most likely have to take another fight before his title shot where he could very well lose.

by ufc4 on Feb 12, 2010 9:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

  1. and #2 contendors are hurt. It was a tough situation.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly? Screw Belfort. He didn’t deserve this title shot. It was given to him mostly on name recognition and the fact that there was no one else in the division who had stepped up. Well now someone has.

Chael has actually been working his way up through the division and has earned his place.

I specializes in grammar fail.

by a tommy point on Feb 12, 2010 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

don’t take it out on belfort

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not blaming Vitor for anything. I just don’t think we should feel as though he’s getting a raw deal here, assuming Sonnen still has the next shot.

I specializes in grammar fail.

by a tommy point on Feb 12, 2010 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

ok. just the ‘screw belfort’ comment made me feel badly for teh phenom

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:39 PM EST up reply actions  

That doesn’t answer my question- IF Belfort is the #1 contender how does this make Silva-Sonnen more likely?

by ufc4 on Feb 12, 2010 10:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

The #1 contender in the UFC is whoever the UFC decides the #1 contender is at the moment. The position can be gained or lost on a whim.

Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.

by FRANKIE on Feb 13, 2010 2:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Kinda like how Wanderlei Silva doesn’t deserve any top 5 fighter anymore, but keeps getting them regardless, right?

It’s interesting to see ‘fan favorite’ Wandy get thrown awesome marquee matches over and over again, even though he hasn’t been the same fighter since..hell, Pride, and no one has a problem with it. Meanwhile, ‘The Phenom’ has actually made a nice little highlight reel of knockouts in his past few fights, but still can’t catch a break with the MMA fans.

by samuraisul on Feb 13, 2010 12:51 AM EST up reply actions  

…..

…….

There’s a HUGE difference between appearing in a “marquee” fight and a title fight.

I specializes in grammar fail.

by a tommy point on Feb 13, 2010 1:09 AM EST up reply actions  

belfort could possibly be out long enough for sonnen to get his title fight first.

by Phildo on Feb 12, 2010 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

There was a growing chorus of people who thought that Maia's ground game was Silva's Kryptonite

That’s true, I was one of those people, and that’s why I think this is a much more interesting fight then Chael Sonnen’s ‘bury my head in his chest’ BS

The problem is that Nate could dominate the same way on the ground, has a better chin, and has better stand-up than Maia

The only thing that makes Sonnen more likely to ‘beat’ Anderson Silva than Maia, is that Sonnen proved he has a good chin in his Marquardt fight

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 12, 2010 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

and its not like maia got manipulated and exposed with marquart, he left himself open and marquart cleaned his clock, these are the types of things that can be changed with attitude and gameplans alone, – dont try and kick Silva, keep your hands up, grab the Mofo and drag him to the mat!!

by merv on Feb 13, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Him and Akiyama were the only 2 viable options at 185 so i am not surprised to see him getting the nodge as they have plan to use Akiyama in a return to japan late in 2010!

Thiago Silva at 205 would of been another good option…

I would of Seen Akiyama as a perfect plan but i guess they really want him to fight in there japan card since they did not use him since about 7 months!

by Fizz on Feb 12, 2010 9:21 PM EST reply actions  

As Kid Nate just pointed out Maia is Suspended until august 6 …. i think we will see more devlopement on this fight!

I still think Akiyama would be a better option!

by Fizz on Feb 12, 2010 9:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Really?

He lost on my card to Alan Belcher. He presents zero threat to Anderson. At least Vitor had the hand speed and KO power, Maia has the sub game, sonnen has the smothering wrestling.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 9:31 PM EST up reply actions  

akiyama is the only middleweight out there who could beat anderson in a walk-off. don’t forget it.

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, but...

Belcher may be more interesting because he is a standup fighter who is going to talk some trash.

by Razzel on Feb 12, 2010 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that if it hits the floor Aki as got little less chances to get a Sub but more chances to get the g&p finish then Maia and Aki would have less problem to take AS down …

Do not forget we already saw what a BJJ black Belt could do against AS and it was not impressiv… Maia is not that much better then Leites at this point of his career and that is in part why i think Aki would be a better matchup!

The take down factor plays a lot in my mind i do not even think Maia comes close to taking AS down!

by Fizz on Feb 12, 2010 9:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Brent

Are you forgetting that Akiyama is Japanese?

by TLow on Feb 12, 2010 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

yep...

it’s official

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

hope that there isn't a curse

that follows this card. Maybe maia’s striking will be improved by a stint training with james toney. He could at least learn the side check kick.

by dugmouth on Feb 12, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I tought Maia had a cut on his eye. Will he get clearance?

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Somehow i do not think that the Abu Dhabi Athletic commission will mind!

by Fizz on Feb 12, 2010 9:29 PM EST up reply actions  

So is Maia fighitng injured?

by Razzel on Feb 12, 2010 9:31 PM EST up reply actions  

yes

and with a nasty eyelid laceration.

Follow me on Twitter @KidNate

by Kid Nate on Feb 12, 2010 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

kampmann now owns exclusive rights to that term

www.tapology.com | twitter @tapology

by GregS123 on Feb 12, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

The eye doesn’t look that nasty to me. This really isn’t a big deal

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 12, 2010 11:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think it matters if it doesn’t look bad, if a doctor said he should be off until Aug. 6th than the UFC had no right in putting him against Silva. I don’t get it, if there is no commission there, and the UFC is just going to neglect what the home commission had to say, than they might as well do other things that are regulated in the US, such as roids.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

The medical suspensions are not definite.

They said august 6th or if a doctor clears you earlier.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah

I saw that below

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Drink everytime Goldberg talks about it being a classic Stike vs grappler match up

by Brian Bobby on Feb 12, 2010 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

We are gonna get f’d up

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 12, 2010 11:57 PM EST up reply actions  

If Silva loses i will hate him because he’ll be responsible for maia/sonnen II

by Brian Bobby on Feb 12, 2010 9:24 PM EST reply actions  

Anderson will kill him

"On the sixth day god created man,but on the fifth day man created god" - Todd White on The Book Of Lucifer:
The Enlightenment

by Krawchuck on Feb 12, 2010 9:34 PM EST reply actions  

SI_JoshGross Talked to Keith Kizer about Maia’s med suspension. There’s no minimum sit-out date, so if a doctor clears him, he’s fine to fight April 10.

New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Feb 12, 2010 9:35 PM EST reply actions  

Thank you! i dunno why eveyone was so up in arms about the medical suspension. The cut isnt nearly as bad as Sonnen’s and Maia can be cleared to return well before the fight date, barring any hicups.

by sadface on Feb 13, 2010 3:20 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

the difference is that the cut is in the eyelid, not the forehead. We were up and arms because we’re worried for his safety, but if a doctor clears him than its all good.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

that’s good to know, I was seriously worried for him

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Title?

On the fight card on UFC.com though it doesn’t have it marked as a title bout. Hmmm…..

by Chadsac on Feb 12, 2010 9:41 PM EST reply actions  

Demian Maia
Record: 12-1
Submitted Chael Sonnen last year.
2007 ADCC Submission Wrestling World Championship

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

What sense does that make. That would be horrible booking on the UFC’s part. Why would they give a guy a title shot, who had just got dominated by Sonnen and already has lost to Silva. That’s bad business and not a great way to get ppv buys

by Brian Bobby on Feb 12, 2010 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree...

I’m sick of this thales leites BS… This is the best p4p fighter in the world, why does the UFC keep robbing us?

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:00 AM EST up reply actions  

if you think getting the #4 guy in the world on short notice because of an injury is being robbed, how on earth do you enjoy this sport?

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Marquardt is a better fight for Silva — and he has been for Silva’s last few fights.

Can’t you see that?!

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:11 AM EST up reply actions  

he just lost. There is no way to promote that, there is no way it makes sense on any level.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:11 AM EST up reply actions  

What about a highlight reel showing nate’s destruction. the knock outs, the pile drive, the choking of chael…. They were able to promote leites for christ sake — give me a break

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:13 AM EST up reply actions  

I really don’t see why that’s important. This is fighting — not the world cup.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s important because he just lost. If Nate Marquardt couldn’t beat Chael Sonnen last week how can anyone pretend he has a chance against Silva next month?

by ufc4 on Feb 13, 2010 12:19 AM EST up reply actions  

styles make fights

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

We should have let the vikings play in the super bowl/

"Just push the ice outside the octagon so Arianny can fall on her head!" - Joe Rogan

by Earl Montclair on Feb 13, 2010 12:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Something tells me the style of a guy who just got dominated by Chael Sonnen isn’t going to matchup well with the best fighter in the world.

by ufc4 on Feb 13, 2010 12:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

Are people just being difficult on purpose, or does the idea of LOSING a match not matter at all anymore? Even WWE/pro wrestling respects the notion of a ‘winner’ moving on while the ‘loser’ has to deal with non-title matches until they win again.

by samuraisul on Feb 13, 2010 12:55 AM EST up reply actions  

The figher with that style you’re so high on has been TKO’d by Anderson already.

I specializes in grammar fail.

by a tommy point on Feb 13, 2010 12:54 AM EST up reply actions  

A fighter with EVERY style

has been TKO’d by Anderson already. If you only give Anderson matchups against fighters with styles he’s never beaten, Anderson would have to retire today. There would be no one to face him. Maybe bring in some Rex Kwan Do blackbelts or something. That’s part of the whole “Anderson’s one of the best fighters of all time” thing. He’s beaten every kind of fighter you can think of. He’s beaten a fighter with a style like Nate Marquardt, even if you don’t count Nate himself.

by Trysdor on Feb 13, 2010 1:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Not sure how that's relevant to my comment.

I’m not arguing for anyone’s style here. Merely replying that Nate’s style, which mma_dude claims should be the reason for giving the title shot to Nate over Maia, didn’t do much of anything the last time he fought Anderson.

I specializes in grammar fail.

by a tommy point on Feb 13, 2010 1:19 AM EST up reply actions  

My bad

it’s just a pet peeve of mine when somebody says Anderson’s already beaten a striker or a wrestler or whatever. Thought that was what you were doing. All the the threading was confusing me. I apologize.

by Trysdor on Feb 13, 2010 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Who Cares About Nate's Loss

Make fights fans want to see & pay for. Nate/Silva is 100 times better than watching Maia/Silva.

Nate has been “next in line status” for a while. He KO’d Maia, & it could be argued in Pride rules the decision might of gone Marquarts way against Sonnen (Nate inflicted more damage, nearly finished Sonnen a few times etc).

After Penn/St. Pierre I, GSP won but got injured & couldn’t fight Hughes. So they brought in BJ Penn even thou “he just lost”. We all got a very entertaining fight as well (3 round exciting fight).

Nate will be WAY more competitive & exciting against Silva than Maia hands down!

by KillerInstinct on Feb 13, 2010 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

it cannot be argued by any rules that nate beat sonnen, he got his ass kicked.

If you are completely insane and think that he would have won under pride rules it doesn’t matter, because the fight was not fought under pride rules.

Don’t bring up fights from 4 years ago for precedent for bringing someone in after a loss, the sport is in a completely different place today.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Nate wouldn’t have won under Pride rules, dominance + damage are the bases for winning a fight, not just damage.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm Talking About How UFC "Could Promote" a Potential Nate/Silva Fight

Guys relax all I saying is it could be argued under Pride rules that Decision could of gone his way if they wanted to promote it.

All I care about is seeing a more entertaining/competitive fight than watching A. Silva/Leites 2.0

Nate/Silva is way better.

by KillerInstinct on Feb 13, 2010 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

but there is no way Nate would have won that under Pride rules. The only place Nate could have potentially won is under the old Rings rules where GnP was illegal and Sonnen would have gotten DQ’d.

Under Pride, they give more emphasis to the submission aspect of the ground game more than they do for GnP, if someone is taken down and just does GnP and does not appear to be finishing the fight, they would stand them back up. But given how the fight went, Sonnen would continue taking him down at will, and by dominating, he would definitely have won the fight, no doubt in my mind.

If you’re talking about how the UFC could disingenuously say that Nate would have won under Pride rules just to promote a fight for Nate/Silva, I don’t think they’d ever do that because it would harm their scoring system. They are not going to promote a fight saying that in another promotion fighter X would have won, that could potentially make people second guess their own scoring system.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Not Arguing with Your Points

Just saying you can spin and promote a fight anyway you want.
You can look the totality of his fights after his intial loss to Silva to now and easily see that no one else in the MW division besides Sonnen is more deserving of a title shot nevermind be more entertaining & competitive than Nate.

IMO fight fans even yourself Orcus would prefer a Nate/Silva over Maia/Silva. And if your trying to use squential rational that Nate just lost, your depriving yourself of enjoying the best fights possible.

Nate has great wrestling, he was just trying to go out there and give a dominating performance and was over anxious. Throwing haymakers, flying knees that were damaging and entertaining to see but cost him the fight. He could of fought a conservative boring fight since he was a virtual shoe in for next in line title fight. But no he wanted to be convincing without question so another future upstart like Vitor would not come in and cut in front of the line.

The fact that he takes risks like that would be way more entertaining against Silva. I don’t want to watch Anderson avoid Maia’s guard for 25 mintues everytime he butt flops because Maia has no stand up skill or can’t take Silva down.

by KillerInstinct on Feb 13, 2010 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m sorry, but I don’t agree with you. I really don’t think Nate is deserving of a shot right now, Sonnen for sure is and Maia needs another win (perhaps a rematch with Nate) before getting the shot. I would rather have them wait until Sonnen is ready to fight or have Andy fight at LHW right now instead of a match with Maia, but between Maia and Nate I think Maia is more deserving of a shot right now. For one, his fight with Nate was over in the first exchange of that fight, it wasn’t a dominant performance as we saw last week (and by dominant I mean a dominant fight, obviously KO’ing your opponent in the first exchange can be considered dominant too), if they were to fight again I’m sure things would not go the same way it did (I’m not trying to take anything away from Nate’s victory though). I really didn’t buy Nate’s hype as most people did.

But you can’t just assume Maia is going to fight Silva the same way Thales did, they are two completely different fighters. Maia actually always tries to engage, so I really don’t think he’ll be "butt flopping" for the whole 25 minutes, I think he’ll definitely engage and lose by TKO or KO.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

He would have still lost under Japanese rules but....

The fight would have been stood up more often. Chael had to take some punishment everytime he took nate down. In pride that would have equalled more punishment for chael. Also, the submission attempts and possibly the damage from the bottom would have weighed heavier in the judges minds. Finally, knees to the head of a grounded opponent, there was that instance in the fight where Nate would have finished if he had that weapon.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

If knees to the head were allowed, maybe chael would have moved to the front and kneed nate’s head instead of riding his back when he had the chance.

Also, Nate would have been DQ’d for elbows.

Also, none of that is relevant, because Chael kicked his ass.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I guarantee you that Nate would be up to the fight against Anderson. Why isn’t Sonnen?

Answer: Because Sonnen got his ass kicked, not nate!

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Too bad Nate isn’t up for the fight because he lost.

He didn’t get his ass kicked, he got cut, and he has other plans for the month

Has the fact that you haven’t been able to convince anyone that Nate won since Saturday really escaped you?

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not trying to convince anyone that Nate won...

Only that Chael is a bore who doesn’t belong fighting the P4P greatest.

He layed on Nate for 3 rounds and after all was said and done, Nate was fine and chael was gashed up.

But yes, your right, Chael won.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not a big fan of wrestlers for that reason (many of them, not all), because they’ll lay on top of someone just throwing bombs (I enjoy technical fights much more). But if they win they win, can’t deny them just because they are boring to some of us sometimes.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

naw man, the rules in Pride much more favors Chael than it does Nate given the fight we saw. and one attempt at submission does not erase the GnP Nate received. GnP is scored in Pride just like it is in the UFC, they only stand you up if you don’t seem to be able to finish the fight from there (think Kimbo vs Roy Nelson), but if they are doing damage like it did in this fight, I think it would have continued on the ground. Maybe only one or two stand ups throughout the whole fight in Pride.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly

and this really is not that I’m a Nate fanboy, I didn’t see the damage some people are saying that chael gave nate. Those ‘slaps’ would have prompted a standup in some japanese promotions — although the slaps would have prevented a penalty card in dream.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Stop with the japan nonsense. It’s just nonsense. The fight wasn’t fought in japan.

If the Super Bowl was in a football league that gave you 20 points for throwing interceptions, the colts would have won, but it wasn’t so they lost.

Nate lost. Get over it. You can say you aren’t a nate fanboy all you want, but your whining since saturday shows otherwise. Every other reasonable nate fan in the world has gotten over it, he got beat. Get over it.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Dude... What's your problem?

I’m over it. I’m not whining that he lost. I’m saying that just because he lost shouldn’t mean that he can’t fight Silva.

Why do you even watch these fights? All you care about is who’s #1? Is that it? Thales Leites was a good match-up for silva ’cause he beat nate and some other dude.

Man… you don’t get what this is all about.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

BTW...

I don’t give a shit about belts, titles, rankings, or records. None of that shit is important when it comes to what’s gonna be interesting inside the cage.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I do think they were damaging but I do agree that it would have got stood up in Pride as well, just not that frequently and the end result would have been the same. I do have to agree with Phildo though (although not with the same language he’s using :p), the fight was in the US (even though I think the end result would have been the same in Japan). It’s really a moot point.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

btw

I’m a Pride nuthugger and love their scoring system, I just think the end results would have stayed the same there as well.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe you're right...

This is really a tangent to what I’ve been argueing in the thread:

Nate/Silva would be the most interesting match-up given the circumstances

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously?!?!?!

Not only did he just lose, he lost by getting thoroughly dominated by a fighter below him in the rankings. None of that warrants a title shot.

Why not give Rolles Gracie the next crack at BROCKLESNAR while we are at it?

"Just push the ice outside the octagon so Arianny can fall on her head!" - Joe Rogan

by Earl Montclair on Feb 13, 2010 12:19 AM EST up reply actions  

because Rolles does not have 8 wins in the UFC and didnt knock out the next title challenger in 21 seconds.

Everyone keeps sating Nate lost, so what. Maia is on a 1 fight win streak, ONE! Come on styles do make fights and Maias TERRIBLE striking is not a good match for the best striker in the world. Nates only weakness is wrestling so does he match up better w/ silva? I think so. I also think Silvas ground game is underrated. If this fight does hit the ground(it won’t) its not gonna be over just like that.

by xbuckeyex05 on Feb 13, 2010 10:28 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Nate lost, so what?

You dont lose a fight and then fight for the belt in your next fight. This logic is beyond absurd and anyone who subscribes to it is either crazy or nut-hugging.

"Just push the ice outside the octagon so Arianny can fall on her head!" - Joe Rogan

by Earl Montclair on Feb 13, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Way too early for Maia.

"Like a ballet of violence clothed in fine Brazilian silk." ~ MMASuPreMaCy

by Benicio on Feb 12, 2010 9:58 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

do you have some other better solution?

Guy ranked number 4 in the world coming off a win seems like a pretty good choice for a late replacement.

by Phildo on Feb 12, 2010 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed. he has potential to grow into a serious contender, if he keeps working his striking. but he ain’t there yet.

by woooburn on Feb 12, 2010 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

1. Belfort is hurt. Out 6-8 months.
2. Sonnen is too hurt to recover in time and he’s running for political office.
3. Nate: Just got beat for 3 rounds.
4. Demian Maia:
+ Just won.
+ Is 12-1.
+ He submitted Chael Sonnen.
+ Abu Dhabi guys know him because he’s fougt in their submission championship. 2007 Champ.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

not trying to speak for benicio, but i dont think he’s arguing with the matchmaking. that makes fine sense. giving maia a title shot this early in his career on the other hand…

by woooburn on Feb 12, 2010 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

how complaining about maia getting a title shot this early in his career not complaining about the matchmaking, he’s number 4 in the world, sometimes you get the shot before you’re ready, but if you’re the best available, why not take it?

by Phildo on Feb 12, 2010 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

oh i totally see that argument. just saying… i’d rather he was further along in his progression, rather being their 2nd or 3rd choice. still gonna watch the hell out of the fight either way

by woooburn on Feb 12, 2010 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s not the best available — Marquardt is. Why Marquardt had to fight Sonnen first is beyond me. It’s almost like the UFC is protecting Silva. After all the UFC has done to diss these boring fighters (Sherk, Maynard, etc.) why did they first make the marquardt/sonnen fight and then tell Joe Rogan to promote Sonnen so heavily during that fight.

THE UFC DOESNT WANT SILVA TO FIGHT MARQUARDT!!!

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:07 AM EST up reply actions  

protect him from the guy he already smashed?

Protect him from the guy that lost his last fight?

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:08 AM EST up reply actions  

do you work for the ufc?

He’s already smashed everyone. He’s the best p4p in the world. Why give him more foder?

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:16 AM EST up reply actions  

any definition that makes maia “fodder” makes nate fodder. Think for a second, you are actually getting upset because they won’t give a guy coming off a loss a title shot. Take all the names out of the equations and think.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

do you work for nate marquardt?

j/k

by woooburn on Feb 13, 2010 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

lol

I’m a fan that wants to see the p4p best get tested.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

by a guy that has already been destroyed by him in one round and is coming off a loss.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Do you really think that Maia is a more competative fight? Why?

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:32 AM EST up reply actions  

that doesn’t matter when you are talking about a championship fight.

But if i did need a reason to think that maia was more competitive, I would say because he has a better record against Anderson Silva than Nate does.

But I don’t need to say that, because it doesn’t matter.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m not bogged down by your artificial rules. The UFC could promote Nate/Anderson if they wanted. The UFC could sign that fight if they wanted. If they did sign that fight, you wouldn’t be seeing all these posts about Silva’s next victim because everyone knows that Marquardt is more competative. This isn’t a tournament structure, the ufc could actually produce the best possible fight, if they wanted.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:39 AM EST up reply actions  

look at what’s happening here.

They picked maia, you are whining that you want nate. If they picked nate, there would be 7 million people whining that they picked a guy coming off of a loss. I think they made the fight choice.

that said, what about my awesome reason that I came up with for your answer? How is a guy that got TKO’d in one round more competitive than Maia/

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

First of all, Marquardt is not the same guy. I already sound like a Nate fanboy so I can’t say more. All I can say is that why would Nate be able to knock Maia out like that and Silva wouldn’t?

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

maia is not the same guy.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:48 AM EST up reply actions  

I hope you're right!

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe I'm wrong,

but I think Phildo can say with some confidence that Maia is not the same guy as Nate.

by John Nash on Feb 13, 2010 12:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I would think

that Nate would be Silva’s next victim after the performance he put in against Chael. Nate will get destroyed just as Maia will. Belfort and Chael have the best shots at dethroning the champ. And this is coming from a HUGE Nate fan. He’s probably my second favorite fighter behind Silva.

"I will do nothing lightly. When I walk, I will walk heavily. When I fight, I will fight with conviction. When I speak, I will speak strongly. When I love, I will love with everything"

by dedstrk316 on Feb 13, 2010 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not all about dethroning the champ...

especially when it’s lay and pray

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  


Silva already beat up Nate.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 13, 2010 12:16 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Things didn’t work out like they should have but it is what it is.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 12, 2010 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

oh absolutely. i guess my point is that i’d rather he get a couple more fights in, since he COULD potentially challenge anderson. just don’t feel like he’s there yet. same way i’d feel if they gave someone like jon jones a title shot.

by woooburn on Feb 12, 2010 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Got it exactly Woodburn. I’m a massive Maia fan and although this is a good solution to get the UFC out of a bind, it’s not a good move for Maia’s progression.

Train that crazy Aoki-type-guard-pulling-craziness Maia! Yoo can doo eet!

"Like a ballet of violence clothed in fine Brazilian silk." ~ MMASuPreMaCy

by Benicio on Feb 13, 2010 6:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I think when someone reaches the top 5 you stop worrying about their progression. he would have had this fight already if he beat nate.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

i think its the way he lost to nate.

It was embarassing. I mean its a shitty situation but how can u justify a guy getting ko’d in 21 seconds. Then wins 1 lackluster decision and he’s ready for a title shot? I honestly worry for Maia’s health in this fight, he’s gonna get hurt very badly.

by xbuckeyex05 on Feb 13, 2010 10:40 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

You can justify that more than you can a guy who just lost a fight.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

getting KO’d in 21 seconds means you made a mistake (Maia losing to Nate), getting your ass beat for 15 minutes means you were outclassed and didn’t have any business being in the ring with your opponent (Nate losing to Chael).

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s how I see it too… I almost think Maia would have deserved the shot less if the match had been longer with Nate and he had been more clearly dominated. That’s paradoxical, I know, because he got a 21 second knockout, but it’s still how my mind works.

by verloc on Feb 13, 2010 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, Nate still could have put on a dominant performance had the fight gone on longer. I still think Maia needed a rematch with Nate before getting a shot, but given the circumstances, I think Maia is more deserving than Nate.

Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever

by Orcus on Feb 13, 2010 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Hmm, where have I heard this before?

Anderson Silva defending his title against a fighter coming off a shaky last few fights who’s a pure grappler with no striking?

Montreal comes to mind . . . last spring maybe? A fellow named Thales Leites flopping around?

Same thing will happen, Maia will find out he can’t hang on his feet, but can’t take him down either so he’ll run away and try and pull guard. Anderson won’t bite by jumping into guard.

F-it, should have given it to Cote, at least he would engage.

by mason_beer on Feb 12, 2010 10:01 PM EST reply actions  

Maia isn’t going to do that. It’s career suicide.

by Razzel on Feb 12, 2010 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I love people who have no idea what they’re talking about. Maia has said before that he’d much rather get knocked on than put on a terrible performance.

Twitter: @FlyByKnite

by FlyByKnight on Feb 12, 2010 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

It's easy to say that in an interview

I do think Maia will avoid pulling a Leites, but I wouldn’t put a lot of stock in him saying he’d rather get knocked out than being boring.

by Scott Haber on Feb 12, 2010 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Really?

The first 10 seconds of his fight with Marquardt were a real snoozefest, you saw what happened next.

by ufc4 on Feb 12, 2010 10:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Did this really have to happen at 112?

Be perfectly fine if it were moved to 113 or 114 and let the hole in Chael’s face heal.

Keep firing Assholes!

I don't know what I'm talking aboot.

by Ubernoober on Feb 12, 2010 10:02 PM EST reply actions  

agreed. rushing a still-progressing contender to a title shot for a tape delayed ppv doesnt make a ton of sense to me.

by woooburn on Feb 12, 2010 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m really confused, the guy is hurt or not? Can he fight or not?
If he is cleared, I like this fight as much as the one it replaces.

"You hit too hard, too hard, too hard..."

by spectaa on Feb 12, 2010 10:04 PM EST reply actions  

I don't get the hate.

Demian is worlds better than Thales Leites on the ground, and has a totally different style anyways. That argument is stale and baseless.

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe

by pdl on Feb 12, 2010 10:10 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Agreed. Maia is really the only guy in the UFC I can imagine beating Anderson – it’s hugely unlikely but he has an advantage and a clear, plausible way to finish the fight in a way that no-one else in the UFC does.

by An0nymous on Feb 12, 2010 10:12 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

“I see myself ready to fight for the belt. I would go at Anderson and it would give him the chance of knocking me out or give me the opportunity to finish the fight. That’s what I expect. I’m not saying I will win, but I will fight to end the fight before the judges decision. I want to do an aggressive fight and expose myself more.”

http://www.fiveknuckles.com/mma-news/Demian-Maia-would-be-aggressive-against-Anderson-Silva.html

For those who think Maia will go Leites on everyone, think again.

Twitter: @FlyByKnite

by FlyByKnight on Feb 12, 2010 10:15 PM EST reply actions  

and tito ortiz says he fights with a broken back and neck or whatever. Wes Simms says he beat Mur.

Point is you can say whatever u want in an interview but when your in the cage it might be different. Don’t get me wrong I hope your right but I have heard fighters describe what I call the “I’m fucked” moment where they realize they can’t take the guy down or strike w/ him. That’s where Thales was at. Maia will be there to but its all how u deal w/ that. Hopefully ur right and he stays aggressive. That’s the only way he gets it down imo is to just come forward aggressively for the td.

by xbuckeyex05 on Feb 13, 2010 10:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Well

Just sayin…

"Well... You're damned if you do, and You're damned if you don't."- Bart Simpson

by poundnground on Feb 12, 2010 10:20 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Could have been a good thing though. Made him really work on his standup..

by Razzel on Feb 12, 2010 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought his stand looked the same to be honest. Not that we got to see any of it in his fight with Nate, but the way his hands were etc.

"Well... You're damned if you do, and You're damned if you don't."- Bart Simpson

by poundnground on Feb 12, 2010 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Nahh, I think the general consensus is that he was much sharper on his fight this last fight.

That doesn’t really matter against Silva though.

by Razzel on Feb 12, 2010 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

It was better, not good though.

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I think people are buying the “He looked great standing up!” but Miller was a little concerned about the takedown!

by verloc on Feb 12, 2010 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

that gif looks like a smaller version of Fedor v Arlovski.

"Like a ballet of violence clothed in fine Brazilian silk." ~ MMASuPreMaCy

by Benicio on Feb 13, 2010 6:17 AM EST up reply actions  

except for the part where arlovski was laid out lookin’ all dead for a minute

Goldie: "Michael Jordan-esque in his grappling skills is Travis Lutter."
Rogan: "No, no he's not. No."

by Stillberry on Feb 13, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

This makes 0 sense to me. How can Maia be an option but Chael is not? Maia was supposed to be suspended longer than Chael right? Doesnt that mean that his cut was more severe? My head hurts.

by b2tharad on Feb 12, 2010 10:29 PM EST reply actions  

not necessarily, i see chael’s cut as being worse by looking at pictures. As for the suspensions, it could just be that they have a length for cuts on the forehead and a length for cuts on the eyelid. And they’re both able to fight earlier if cleared.

by Phildo on Feb 12, 2010 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

It's also about who wants the fight

they could have offered it to Chael and he could have said he wants more time to train.

We will probably never know who was “offered the fight” but Maia could have been first but he could have also been the 5th person to be offered the fight.

by bigdmmafan on Feb 12, 2010 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe Dana said Chael would not be offered the fight.

by ufc4 on Feb 12, 2010 10:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Could always be some wordplay

“hey, does Chael have any interest?”
“not right now”
“okay”

That’s not “offering”

Not saying that’s what happened. But hey..

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com

by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for that. Makes a little more sense that way. Well as much as any of this can make sense that is.

by b2tharad on Feb 12, 2010 10:32 PM EST reply actions  

It’ll be interesting to see if Maia doesn’t get cleared and they still put him in the cage and go against the athletic commission ruling.

by ChillMike on Feb 12, 2010 10:46 PM EST reply actions  

UFC can’t afford to thumb its nose at the Nevada commission, and risk pissing those guys off. I’m sure Maia will be cleared long before this fight. When UFC has cards at places without commissions, Marc Ratner steps in and heads up the commission responsibilites.

This should be interesting, Maia is not Leites, and up until the Miller fight, he hadn’t had a boring one yet. I think the Miller fight was slow just because of the way the styles matched up.

by dpk875 on Feb 12, 2010 10:54 PM EST reply actions  

This is actually pretty good. As much as I think another Cote fight would be entertaining (I think Anderson would actually fight him more this time) this is about the most credible threat they could put forth at this time. Nate was just dominated by Sonnen.

Only thing is that eyelid injury. Presumably its not as bad as it looks, or else this is a little greasy. I’d thought it wasn’t a possibility, but if its not as bad as initially appeared, this fight makes sense.

by TLow on Feb 12, 2010 10:56 PM EST reply actions  

they should make it a non-title fight..

Maia dosnt deserve a title shot yet, especially since he got KO’d in 21’s in Aug.

by ThereWlLLbeBlood on Feb 12, 2010 10:59 PM EST reply actions  

Non-title fights against the champ make no sense.

by TLow on Feb 12, 2010 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

tell that to strikeforce :)

by woooburn on Feb 12, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

yep, I agree completely. Throw Sengoku in there too.

by TLow on Feb 12, 2010 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I love that movie.

by ufc4 on Feb 12, 2010 11:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I really hope some mma journalist get on their job because this makes zero sense on multiple fronts. First off Maia has no reason to even be in consideration after only beating Miller in his last fight. Second, if we ignore that which I won’t he was suspended for longer than Sonnen was.

There has to be a bigger story here because right now this is one of the few decisions the UFC has made that makes no sense whatsoever and that isn’t like them.

Chael would have had enough time to prepare for Andy, he was the clear choice and let’s face it Maia vs. Silva will have no heat if it happens. Cote would have been a better option, he actually fought Silva even until a freak accident took him out.

Like I said earlier we need answers because right now i’m baffled by this decision and I can’t be the only one.

by Raker on Feb 12, 2010 11:25 PM EST reply actions  

Maia holds a decisive win over the current number one contender Sonnen. Although Maia’s suspension was longer, unlike Sonnen, Maia was given the option to be cleared earlier by a doctor. Sonnen suffered mutliple facial lacerations, while Maia had one cut on his eyelid. Sonnen’s suspension would’ve only given him a month or less to train. Maia has apparently already received word on medical clearance, or the UFC is confident he will be cleared quickly.

by MMAmadman on Feb 12, 2010 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Makes sense that Maia is coming off a win, Sonnen is healing,Nate just lost to Sonnen and Vitor is out of commission. As long as Maia is not going to aggravate his injury this is fine. Let Andy settle up what’s left at 185, I really look forward to see Sonnen and Belfort take a crack at it.

by Koob on Feb 12, 2010 11:25 PM EST reply actions  

it doesnt matter

all will lose to Silva. the order is not important.

by Td9d on Feb 12, 2010 11:58 PM EST reply actions  

Botter says
There’s more to the story of Chael not being chosen for the title fight. Needless to say, it’s not all injury related…

Anyone care to elaborate?

by ufc4 on Feb 13, 2010 12:20 AM EST reply actions  

He’s running for office and the election is in may.

I’d say he wants to spend time doing that and there might be campaign rules/laws preventing the ufc form promoting him during that time.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Sonnen is better off waiting. He can recover, heal, and come up with a good game plan. Otherwise, he would rush in beat up and with a short camp.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 13, 2010 12:36 AM EST up reply actions  

he doesn’t need a long camp when he’s just coming off of another fight. The cut will not stip him from being in shape. the only concerns for him were the cut and the election.

by Phildo on Feb 13, 2010 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Sick burn.

"Just push the ice outside the octagon so Arianny can fall on her head!" - Joe Rogan

by Earl Montclair on Feb 13, 2010 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m calling Sarah Palin on you. Is that satire? haha.

Well played sir. I got burned. It happens.

by snakecharmer1340 on Feb 13, 2010 1:39 AM EST up reply actions  

You’ll bounce back.

"Just push the ice outside the octagon so Arianny can fall on her head!" - Joe Rogan

by Earl Montclair on Feb 13, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

+100

We can dream, can’t we?

by CaptainSpaulding on Feb 13, 2010 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes we can!

Jacare i think could beat A LOT of the UFC MW. His standup looked so clean in his last fight too. I hope he beats Shields, Hendo and goes to UFC.

by Pain on Feb 13, 2010 2:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Shame Maia already owned him in a grappling match.

Paniczoo reincarnated.

by ziiiiing on Feb 13, 2010 2:45 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Jacare owned Maia TWICE in a grappling competition, both times by submission. Maia won once, on points.

by dancingChicken on Feb 13, 2010 5:43 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

And

if you dont think Jacare could take down silva with ease watch his abu dhabi competition vs Werdum

by Pain on Feb 14, 2010 2:35 AM EST up reply actions  

I doubt they would fight

Some places have Jacare as a member of Black House others say he just trained with Silva before fighting Leites.

Either way A. Silva has this “loyalty thing” about not fighting friends and training partners.

But Jacare would be awesome in the UFC.

by bigdmmafan on Feb 13, 2010 2:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Overall I'm happy...

I like this fight better than the Silva/Sonnen match-up. Maia actually has a chance at finishing Anderson if he can close the distance without getting punched in the face. The only thing we were going to learn in the sonnen fight is how good sonnen’s chin really is.

I'm just a dude who's trying to put it together.

by mma_dude on Feb 13, 2010 12:42 AM EST reply actions  

Demian’s got a snowball’s chance in Hell… but WAR MAIA!!!

by kid_eh on Feb 13, 2010 12:58 AM EST reply actions  

Seriously....

I’m hoping for the Immaculate Reception of Submissions to occur…

and by that I’m hoping the ball is Andy’s head….

by Koob on Feb 13, 2010 1:45 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

holy shit I just gave props to the Steelers….I’m going to punch myself in the nuts.

by Koob on Feb 13, 2010 1:46 AM EST up reply actions  

already happened with Ryo Chonan.

by TLow on Feb 13, 2010 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

The shot is justifiable and the fight is an interesting one. Maia has a real shot at pulling of a submission win here. If Silva gets careless and starts throwing flying knees and leaves himself open, Maia can get a takedown and make things pretty miserable down there.

I don’t think they offered the fight to Sonnen because I really think they can make Sonnen/Silva into a pretty big fight.

Not that I condone facism or any ism for that matter. Isms are in my opinion, not good. A person shouldn't believe in an ism, he should believe in himself.

I quote John Lennon, "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me". Good point there, after all he was the walrus. I could be the walrus. Wouldn't change the fact I have to bum rides off of people.

by Sam Cupitt on Feb 13, 2010 12:59 AM EST reply actions  

This matchup surprised me, but what the hell, Anderson’s probably going to fight Maia, Sonnen and Belfort eventually. The order is out of whack, but I’m alright with this. I don’t think Maia will pull guard from the other side of the Octagon, and I truly believe that someone’s going to have to surprise Anderson and finish him to ever beat him, at least at MW in a five rounder. Belfort and Maia have the capacity to finish someone, and Chael doesn’t, so while I’d have preferred Nate, I can understand why they picked Demian.

by Kwisatz Haderach on Feb 13, 2010 1:07 AM EST reply actions  

Thought about it for a couple of hours and i’m still dumbfounded there has to be more to the story than what we’ve heard this is atypical of how the UFC does things.

by Raker on Feb 13, 2010 2:13 AM EST reply actions  

Jordan Breen pretty much summed up my feelings on this fight during his latest chat:

…it’s the same thing as the Hardy-St. Pierre fight. People will write it off because Maia is likely to get blasted on the feet, and that’s true. But, that dismissal belies the fact that Maia is about 50000 times more likely to actually beat Anderson if he gets a takedown than anyone else the UFC has to offer.

by Jahbulon on Feb 13, 2010 2:16 AM EST reply actions  

This fight is the equivalent of Rocky Balboa versus Apollo Creed!

"If your going to come on then come on!" - Harold Howard

by Bandaka on Feb 13, 2010 2:16 AM EST reply actions  

They should have brought in Randy.

by MrJobro on Feb 13, 2010 2:17 AM EST reply actions  

Silva vs. Randy

See Silva vs. Griffin only worse. Sure Randy might be able to do a little pinning against the cage but he would get hit with a shot sometime in the fight and unlike Vera, Silva would finish him.

by bigdmmafan on Feb 13, 2010 2:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I know it would have been sweet to see it.

by MrJobro on Feb 13, 2010 5:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Great fight

Marquardt took advantage of his main stand up weakness, dropping his hand when he does his headkick.
I think he’s learned from that.
I look forward to a battle of tremendous techniques

by BeeWing on Feb 13, 2010 3:09 AM EST reply actions  

UFC new partners at work

This smacks of UFC new partners at play. Maia is a well known name in Abu Dhabi, I am sure he is a fan favourite there.

I know its unlikely but I hope that Maia shuts Anderson up.

by Oneman on Feb 13, 2010 3:17 AM EST reply actions  

Unless Maia is cleared by a reputable medical specialist, I have to strongly disapprove of the UFC’s decision to book a seriously injured fighter for a fight in a venue with no athletic commission.

NSAC suspensions apply worldwide. He WILL be cleared, or the UFC wouldn’t have booked him for the fight. If he were to fight without clearance before his medical suspension is up, he would face further NSAC penalties regardless of there being no athletic commission in Abu Dhabi.

by MMAmadman on Feb 13, 2010 5:13 AM EST reply actions  

Suspensions do not apply worldwide

There have been fighters who have been banned due to drug test failures that continue to fight in other countries.

However I can’t see UFC putting the fight on unless Maia gets clearance in the US

by Oneman on Feb 13, 2010 5:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Who and when? And were they able to get re-licensed in the U.S.?

by MMAmadman on Feb 13, 2010 7:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Bigfoot silva and potentially Barnett

by Oneman on Feb 13, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course one CAN fight outside the U.S. while under NSAC suspension, but they would be in violation of the suspension and face further penalties should they ever want to fight in the U.S. again.

by MMAmadman on Feb 13, 2010 8:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Vitor had no problems fighting in the US after violating a suspension.

But yeah, Maia will be cleared (really, it wouldn’t surprise me if he’s already been cleared by a doctor) well before the fight. I think Nate is overreacting to the NSAC suspension. Those types of suspensions happen all the time and are never an issue.

by rabrown on Feb 13, 2010 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

lol no

its a state athletic commission, they dont have jurisdiction outside of their own state

by yukkurishiteittene on Feb 13, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

i will only be pissed about this if Sonnen ends up getting screwed out of a shot later on. like if they give it to belfort right when he comes back in lieu of Chael. that would be lame.

Goldie: "Michael Jordan-esque in his grappling skills is Travis Lutter."
Rogan: "No, no he's not. No."

by Stillberry on Feb 13, 2010 2:27 PM EST reply actions  

Prepare to be pissed.

"Just push the ice outside the octagon so Arianny can fall on her head!" - Joe Rogan

by Earl Montclair on Feb 13, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

well this fight definitely isnt as intriguing as belfort but why bitch? its a fight we know wont go to decision so it cant be that bad, i personally think anderson will slaughter this guy in the first round but hey it will still be worth watching, quit being tree hugging hippies and stop bitching, ur making my eyes hurt pu*sies

by blumpkins on Feb 13, 2010 4:14 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D
Obp_small
Nick Diaz - The Musical

Recent FanPosts

Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support
Warrior_small
MMA Transaction Wire: February 4-10
Bv_small
BE Trivia Night

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings