Determining the All-Time Greats of Mixed Martial Arts
One of the interesting discussions that was created out of the recent Randy Couture vs. Mark Coleman showdown at UFC 109 was the talk about how we will be able to determine the all-time greats of our sport in the years to come. Mainstream sports like football, baseball, basketball, and hockey have athletes who have been indisputably given the title, but MMA doesn't have the decades of competition to truly make the same comparisons.
Michael Jordan, Wayne Gretzky, Babe Ruth, and Jim Brown are all considered legendary greats of their respective sports, but some are simply out of reach of ever being compared. Wayne Gretzky dominated the NHL in an era that was far tougher than today's game. Perhaps hockey was less technical in those days, but the physical aspect of the sport was much more dominating. It wasn't uncommon for players to headhunt constantly throughout a game without ever being penalized. Players could set picks, crush opponents without the puck, and cross check at will. Despite the tough environment, Gretzky always found a way to produce.
Ruth's display of power, Jordan's dominance and ability to change a game all by himself, and Brown's incredible rushing records were equally astonishing. How will we be able to determine the all-time greats of mixed martial arts when this sport is in its infancy in comparison to some of the other major sports?
MMA's heavyweights were at the forefront of the discussion on Twitter yesterday as Sports Illustrated's Josh Gross, Sherdog's Jordan Breen, and a bevy of MMA fans and writers debated as to what criteria should be scrutinized in the selection. The leading candidates focused on Fedor Emelianenko, Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira, Randy Couture, Mark Coleman, and Mirko "CroCop" Filipovic with mentions of Bas Rutten, Don Frye, Igor Vovchanchyn, Brock Lesnar, and Tim Sylvia all in the mix.
The most agreed upon criteria included accomplishments over the course of one's career in combination with victories over contemporary fighters. While some fans felt this would hurt the chances of fighters such as Mark Coleman, the argument was made by Jordan Breen that the "pioneer" era of MMA didn't necessarily produce great fighters unless they proved it in the modern era.
In thinking about the all-time best fighters in our sport, I came to a conclusion that multiple factors bring about this same theory. Modern training methods, the evolution of how techniques are used in the sport, more abundance of quality competitors, and more knowledge of ways in which to escape those "pioneering" techniques have brought about a disparity in the two time periods.
Mark Coleman is the perfect example. Coleman was the pioneer of ground and pound in mixed martial arts, but as MMA evolved into something much more dynamic and popular -- more fighters trained in the ways in which to counter such abilities. Coleman didn't evolve in that manner. Age has something to do with his most recent performances, but Coleman wasn't overly successful in the past decade.
Fedor entered the sport at the very end of the pioneer era, but we can safely say that he was miles ahead of the competition at the time. Nogueira was equally ahead of the competition in his jiu-jitsu prowess, but he's also proven to be an evolving fighter even in lieu of the many doubters he had following his loss to Frank Mir. For that reason, both men are consider the #1 and #2 heavyweights of all-time respectively.
Couture would likely be my third choice on the list. He's managed to not only be successful in the early days of the UFC, but he's also accomplished titles in the modern era as well as wins against contemporary fighters. Coleman and CroCop round out the top five, but it's a tough call as to where each man would sit. The alternatives, however, can quickly be dismissed.
It's an interesting topic, but I believe it's a bit early to compile a true top five. Right now, many fans felt Coleman and CroCop were interchangeable at #4 and #5 with Lesnar becoming a shoe-in in the next few years. I generally agree with that, but I believe the constant evolution of MMA is only going to push guys like Coleman and CroCop out of the top five and potentially top ten as the years go by. We'll undoubtedly see great athletes in the sport as we move ahead, and it's a shame that some of these fighters will be forgotten by fans who haven't even discovered this fantastic sport yet.
112 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Fedor is the all time great
Fedor is with no doubt the current all time great, especially if we are speaking about HWs.
7 years of domination on his division and counting. 31 victories and à losses and so many good fighters beaten. He is also the most respected fighter by the hardcore fans and is very influencial.
There is no days without Fedor threads on the main mma forums.
Decided by you and revisionist hardcore Fedor fans. A loss is a loss, no matter how goofy it is. It’s on his record, it’s a loss. It doesn’t matter how hard or long you cry.
If you take away that loss then give Arona his “win”. It’s a wash then.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:28 PM EST up reply actions
Fedor won the Arona fight by unanimous decision , which was the correct decision. Draw, plus extra round.
Fedor has not lost against Kohsaka. Not only it was a cut after 17 seconds, but it was comming after and illegal blow.
So yes, Fedor is undefeated.
Interesting… when Fedor got the cut, what did they call it?
The fight with Arona should NOT have been a draw. It didn’t need to go to some random, shady, extra round.
Fedor has a loss dude, you need to learn to cope with that.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:36 PM EST up reply actions
Wasn’t that in RINGS?
Under RINGS rules, he probably won. Their rules and judging criteria were downright confusing.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Feb 12, 2010 6:37 PM EST up reply actions
It was
Even under Rings rules it was shady. Under any normal set of MMA rules it would have been downright criminal.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe Virginia had outsourced their AC for the event?
New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Feb 12, 2010 6:41 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
You just don’t understand the rules of RINGS.
Arona did LNP and was unable to mount offense. He had a RNC attempt but that’s all. Fedor tried more and score points on it. The first two round were close enough to call a extra round.
Fedor won the extra round and won the unanimous decision. If the rules were not that way, Fedor would not have pulled a dozen of guillotine in that fight nor give up the top position like he did.
For Kohsaka, you can call that a loss technically, (while it can be contested), but Fedor is still undefeated.
You mean to have us believe that you are objectively scoring the Rings fight? I have an VERY hard time believing that, since you’re already trying to re-write history to erase a loss on Fedors record. I am well aware of Rings rules and Arona won. Not even controversially. It should have NEVER gone to an extra round.
It’s can’t be contested that Fedor lost. He DID. The org he fought for declared it a loss. He agreed to the rules of the org, he gets the loss.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:48 PM EST up reply actions
Then, he can be argued.
Fedor has been cut by an illegal blow. And illegal blow can’t decide a fight.
something
smells like 2007 in here.
by some schmuck in texas on Feb 12, 2010 8:34 PM EST up reply actions
okay...
he “officially” has a loss. But it’s been covered to death. It was an illegal blow that caused it, the promotion had to advance someone in the tournament and the cut prevented Fedor from doing so…so he “lost” to keep the tournament moving along.
Even if you consider it a loss…it’s not like you lack the ability to objectively look at it and go “okay, that’s not really a loss that should impact his standing”
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 7:48 PM EST up reply actions
Except it was in no way an illegal blow, elbow my buutocks. It was a loss, learn to cope, not to mention fedor has had 1 fight in a cage and has never set foot in the ufc.
Paniczoo reincarnated.
by ziiiiing on Feb 13, 2010 3:11 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Learn to cope?
Look man, don’t be an asshole.
Watch the fight. It’s the elbow that lands. An unintentional elbow, but an elbow nonetheless. Just like an unintentional low blow is still a foul.
What does Fedor’s cage experience or time in the UFC have to do with what he has already accomplished?
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 13, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
not being ahole, you just can't deal with reality and the power that you have to influence the opinions of new fans shouldnt be abused by twisting the truth
ive watched the fight plenty of times and it was a straight right hand that clearly grazed his eye with the edge of a glove, how anyone thinks he elbowed him when throwing a straight punch is beyond comprehension.
Heres the fight video again so anyone who hasnt seen it doesnt get sucked in to the line of bs you and other fedor superfans are selling
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2XtuSFYmM0
as you can see the guy punched fedor in the face and the doctor stopped it, it was a loss with no contraversy, no protests, no debate.
The reason ufc and cage time are relevant is because the cage is the predominant fighting environment and the ufc is the predominant promotion. Its kinda like trying to say a certain tennis player is the best ever when they have never played on a grass court or competed at/won wimbledon.
Paniczoo reincarnated.
Under RINGS rules I think Fedor definitely won. In RINGS you weren’t awarded for position, you were awarded for submission attempts. Watch the the fights again, and keep that this in mind. All the time Arona has top position meant nothing to the judges. The four or five guillotines that Fedor attempts (sometimes poorly) he is awarded for each time.
Under any other rules, besides the ones that fought under, Arona would have won. Of course, anywhere else Fedor would have been allowed to throw closed-fist punches to the head when Arona was down, so lets not forget one of Fedor’s biggest weapons was also taken from him under the rules.
Exactly...
This is why everyone who really thinks Arona won is wrong. Under RINGS rules, he didn’t win at all.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Feb 12, 2010 9:44 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I just rewatched Fedor vs Arona.
Fedor definitely won that fight. LNP is not rewarded. It was nice seeing Fedor doing rookie mistakes and not trying to score point, like giving up top position for standing up, trying to pull guillotine or to leglock Arona but ultimately that won him the fight.
Arona had more dominant position but did nothing with it, except a choke attempt in th first and was reversed by Fedor while almost all of his TD attempts were stuffed.
Fedor lost to Arona :)
Keep firing Assholes!
I don't know what I'm talking aboot.
by Ubernoober on Feb 12, 2010 6:29 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Gretzky was able to do well because no one was allowed to touch him.
Keep firing Assholes!
I don't know what I'm talking aboot.
Not sure I agree. Andreychuk used to antagonize the shit out of him, but you couldnt hold a guy on the boards forever. Which is what some teams tried. Gretzky would slip out and suddenly score.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Feb 12, 2010 6:12 PM EST up reply actions
bah.
He high sticked Doug Gilmore in the face in the confrence finals and didn’t get a penalty for it cause he’s so special.
BAH!
Keep firing Assholes!
I don't know what I'm talking aboot.
How many goals was it he scored in his greatest season? 92?
He had the greatest hockey sense of any player ever. Others had more pure skill, but here was a guy who was very unremarkable from a physical size and skill point of view, but who could generate points like nobody else. (granted he was on the Oilers..)
That’s something to look up to, anyway.
And two things:
Its Doug Gilmour
And the Habs woulda taken ’em anyway.
Kinda like Jordan’s push off in the finals against Utah that wasn’t called.
by ufc4 on Feb 12, 2010 6:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I thought about bringing this up
I still think Jordan is the best ever, but he really did have an unfair advantage.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions
i see calls missed like that all the time...
I'm like PacMan fightin you silly kids... throw ya Hatton the ring, and get knocked outlike Ricky did.
lol.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_career_achievements_by_Wayne_Gretzky
he has 61 NHL records, im pretty sure there is more to it than him not being bullied consistently.
All anyone has to do is..
Watch ESPN Classic.
There were entire shifts where he’d get pinned in the boards, then come off the boards, shoot, score.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Feb 12, 2010 6:30 PM EST up reply actions
In my opinion, Coleman and Gracie are in similar situations, except Gracie was there at the very beginning. Both brought new styles that changed the game, and neither really evolved into the new breed of mixed martial artist. Coleman’s problem is that he’s fought too long, and fans now see him as a tired old man.
Fedor will always have that mystique.
As of now, he is the best HW ever. Maybe someone will come along and take that title away from him, but they’ll never match the aura Fedor has.
The closest anyone has gotten to that yet is Anderson Silva, but the difference is that Fedor doesn’t look superhuman – he’s been hurt and still wins, no matter what advantages the opponent has. Silva just never gets touched. He also has several legit losses.
Machida could have had that unblemished aura, but the Shogun fight ended that. Even if he retires undefeated, most fans will want to put an asterisk next to that fight. Unless Machida 2.0 comes out, his weakness is showing and will probably lose soon via leg kicks.
I doubt we’ll ever have another Fedor. Enjoy him while he lasts.
New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Feb 12, 2010 6:12 PM EST reply actions
If Machida wins the re-match and doesn’t lose for 30 something fights nobody will even think about that Shogun fight other than hardcores trying to make a point.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions
True
But that’s nearly the only type of fan that fequents this site. There will always be the arguments coulda shoulda woulda etc but unfortunately when there are permanent records involved a loss shall forever be a loss, even if a majority believes it shouldve gone the other way. Also, even if it’s painfully obviously a bad decision there’ll be a million douchebags swearing otherwise & there shall be nothing we can do..
Be like water..
by theredoctober on Feb 12, 2010 11:55 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Fedor still has what MMA has taken away from most fighters. He’s got the old kind of martial arts mystique, whereby a guy from a tiny town in Russia can come in, training at his local gym, and beat 30 guys with only one controversial loss. MMA took away a lot of the mystery away from martial arts, in that it became apparent fairly early on (after the first dozen or so UFCs) that size did in fact matter, and the modern MMA gym emerged to, so its become all about the guys who are bigger, faster, and train harder to win. It’s not hard to see why a guy like Brock Lesnar or GSP can be so dominant, and that’s not taking anything away from what they’ve done. Almost nobody has the old aura of the invincible martial artist anymore, though I’d say Anderson Silva is pretty close too.
Fedor still has the old mystique in that he’s smaller than most of his opponents, doesn’t train anywhere fancy, looks beatable in most of his fights and yet wins every time
Could someone explain to me why Tim Sylvia is even mentioned? He was beaten by Fedor, Nogueira and Couture and do I need to mention the fact that Ray Mercer knocked him out basically before he even started the fight.
Sylvia was 80lbs over weight and on the downside of his career. Holyfield and Tyson have lost to some terrible fighters but it doesn’t effect the evaluation of when they were in their prime. Now your 1st statement does hold some merit, could someone explain to me why Tim Sylvia is even mentioned (as in a great fighter). Well, he did keep winning the UFC belt back while smashing Dana’s more marketable fighters.
Don’t sweat it. Apparently, you have to be a heavyweight to be remembered, so this list is ridiculous anyway.
by Kwisatz Haderach on Feb 14, 2010 12:48 AM EST up reply actions
Fedor
Is clearly the best HW fighter to date. I think Big Nog is a very close second.
Historically, it’s hard to not say that Coleman, Randy or Igor are “greater” but then it comes down to what criteria you use. Igor was a freaking menace.
Against bad competition. Igor isn’t even in the discussion in my mind.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Feb 12, 2010 6:30 PM EST up reply actions
I have a hard time faulting old legends for fighting who was available back in the day. It’s like saying Jim Brown couldn’t hang in todays NFL. Sure it’s true, but it’s not a fair comparison.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:37 PM EST up reply actions
That’s the debate here.
BUT Igor fought some fights in the modern era and looked bad. He’s not an all-time great.
Jim Brown was an absolute LOAD in his prime. I have no doubt he’d be a top back in our time, although probably not those numbers.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Feb 12, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
Sure, but his fights in the modern era were after his prime so I don’t feel like that’s a just measurement of his skill either. I think being the best and scariest man in your time should mean something, even if future competition is loads better. They’re SUPPOSED to be loads better.
You really think that about Jim Brown? I think he’d be mediocre at best. Guys are to fast and strong these days.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:41 PM EST up reply actions
And Couture’s aren’t?
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Feb 12, 2010 6:43 PM EST up reply actions
Come again?
I don’t understand what you’re asking.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:49 PM EST up reply actions
Coutoure's fights in the modern aren't after his prime?
I'm like PacMan fightin you silly kids... throw ya Hatton the ring, and get knocked outlike Ricky did.
lol.
gotta adjust for era...
you can’t just say “if you took them out of their time and put them in ours they’d be ____”
I mean, Babe Ruth would hit .180 against modern pitching. He wouldn’t know what the hell was coming at him.
Training, conditioning, medical science…all that shit is different.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 7:55 PM EST up reply actions
Exactly, and that’s why it’s tough to determine. Hence why Couture and even Coleman gets a slight bump because he at least beat some modern era fighters. It’s all based on guys crossing the era line and winning. A guy like Igor was on his downturn at the beginning of a more modern era.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Feb 12, 2010 8:24 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, Igor was really dominant over “meh” competition. Whenever he fought someone higher up in the division he wasn’t a murderer. Then he drops down to 205 and that didn’t work out well.
So if you try to adjust you have a guy who was probably too small for HW (much moreso than Fedor) who always seemed good-not-great. The Telligman fight really cements it for me. When he moved to his more natural weight of 205 he was well past prime but did not look good at all.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 8:41 PM EST up reply actions
I agree with this generally in the other major sports. You can only judge guys by their dominance over the competition of their time, however, I don’t think this should apply so much to MMA’s first decade. It was the sport’s infancy, and the competition was WAY thinner back then. 40 or 50 years from now, it’ll be like a mythic age. The skill level and conditioning of most top fighters now is light years beyond what it was at that point. The lighter guy’s can’t even be considered from that time period. It is cool to think how much of a history there is in MMA already, and that we’ll have all this media to record the early days for future evaluation. Baseball players, and other athletes from the pre-World War II era are often really hard to get an accurate picture of. How does Tom Harmon, or Ty Cobb rank in their sports? To me it’s pretty pointless trying to figure that out. The important thing is that they’ve been remembered.
by Kwisatz Haderach on Feb 14, 2010 1:02 AM EST up reply actions
Tim Mercer (check the name tag)

Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 12, 2010 7:57 PM EST up reply actions
Fedor is an enigma and the greatest MMA fighter ever…
Not to mention he’s small for a HW, doesn’t train at a “famous” camp, doesn’t have million dollar equipment like other fighters (ie trains in a playground), looks bored, never talks shit, beats K1 Level strikers on the feet, Beats olympic caliber wrestlers and BJJ Champions on the ground, and has never truly lost.
Fedor is the GOAT.
I’m surprised Mohamed Ali wasn’t mentioned as an all time great.
But yeah, Fedor is definitely going to be remembered like the Micheal Jordan or Ali of MMA.
It was a short list. In reality the list can be very long and lead to a VICIOUS debate. I can’t say he’s the Greatest due to my limited boxing knowledge but he’s the most well-known and inspirational in charsima and technique.
To the hardcore, Fedor will be the greatest but the casual viewer will say Randy Couture simply because he’s a well-known American influence and they can pronounce his name (I still cant say Emelianeko correctly).
I still say Randy Couture. Probably because he shares his life more than Fedor does and we all know what kind of person he is. He’s held 2 belts as well as continue fighting to a point where I don’t think champion is priority. I really think MMA is just a physical/Mental test for him. Luke Thomas (schooled me on MMA Nation one time) said that he quickly took the Mark Coleman fight for that reason.
I'm always debating the greatness of Couture with myself.
He’s won a lot of belts but he’s also received more title shots than anyone in MMA history. No other fighter in MMA gets the Randy Couture treatment. Most guys lose a title shot and have to put together a series of victories over 2-3 years to get another title shot. Couture takes 8 months off than takes a high profile fight, win or lose his next fight will be for a title. He wins he’s great. He loses, well he lost to a great opponent . . . no shame.
Not saying Couture is crap and doesn’t deserve a lot of accolades just he is also tricky to judge. He’s certainly manged his career better than anyone in MMA history. None of his fights have ever had a downside to damage his image.
Randy is Americana!!!
Randy is like apple pie and fireworks on the 4th of July. He’s the Brett Favre of MMA!
by JONBONESJONES79 on Feb 12, 2010 7:47 PM EST up reply actions
BRETT FAVRE?
He’s the opposite of Brett Favre. When he gets into the pressure situation i.e. championship fights…he comes through. Favre…not so much.
by MMAFAN FO SHO on Feb 12, 2010 7:56 PM EST up reply actions
C'mon Man!!!
Brett Favre’s been to two Superbowls and has won one!! The same exact record as Peyton Manning. Besides that, I was talking about his level of respect among fans of sports.
by JONBONESJONES79 on Feb 12, 2010 8:31 PM EST up reply actions
He’s the Terry Bradshaw of MMA! without the madness. Awesome supporting cast and the ability to get it done in the biggest moments, but not great statistically speaking…
by Kwisatz Haderach on Feb 14, 2010 1:07 AM EST up reply actions
While Ali is the best-known, I think most hardcore fans would put Sugar Ray Robinson at #1 (175-19-6, 109 KO)
Admittedly, I have only a vague knowledge of boxing, but he’s the guy for whom they invented the term pound-for-pound.
New Orleans Saints - 2010 Super Bowl Champions. Unbelievable. Who Dat.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Feb 12, 2010 7:16 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
For not knowing
boxing, you hit a home run. Ooops wrong sport. recd.
Fedor won’t be remembered like the Jordan or Ali of MMA because not enough people know who he is. If he had the exposure that a fighter of his caliber deserves, it’d be a done deal. I think the EA MMA game will do a lot to help casuals learn who he is and get the recognition he deserves.
But if you are stupid, you will be beaten with a stick - Proverbs 10:13
That might be true
but in that event he’d be remembered as a Joe Luis, which is even better in the eyes of real aficionados of the sport.
by Chris Barton on Feb 12, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions
You’re crazy if you think he doesn’t have a big fan base. He’s a celebrity in countries like Japan and Korea, he’s a hero in Russia, and he has an ass load of fans in the US too.
Fedor’s really not a big deal in any of those countries. If he was, M-1 wouldn’t be relying on the US market and Affliction and Strikeforce to get him fights, instead he’d be fighting in Russia and the top fighters would be going there to fight him. At PRIDE’s peak Fedor was always behind the likes of Wanderlei, Cro Cop and Nogueira as far as being a big star.
He won't be
remembered because he isn’t fighting for the people keeping the records. If Brock wins the next 15 against UFC competition he will be labeled the greatest HW ever. He is a product of the machine.
Brock has 3 fights in his UFC career?
I’d be shocked if Brock ever made it to 15 fights even if he never loses. Regardless it’s a bit too early to be talking about 15 fight win streak. Anderson Silva and Chuck Liddell have had UFC’s most dominant win steaks around consecutive 7-8 fights.
What about "Strange Brew"?
Remember that guy from the first season of Ultimate Fighter. He tops my list of worst ever. There was a guy from the season with Mac Danzig that sucked ass too…can’t remember his name, but I was watching Inside MMA and they showed him getting his ass kicked in some small show. He was a little bitch.
Is fedor the best heavyweight of all time?
Not only is fedor the best heavyweight but the best mma fighter of all time. Everybody he has faced hes beaten. He has the mma undefeated streak record and counting. Beats ufc champions like nothin! On the ground or standing he’ll take you out at your strength. He is the reason a lot of people are interested in mma.
Brock Lesnar is the reason a lot of people are intrested in MMA.
Keep firing Assholes!
I don't know what I'm talking aboot.
Brock Lesnar
But those people are WWE tools who don’t know shit about MMA.
by MMAFAN FO SHO on Feb 12, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions
Yah! We’re better than those guys.
Be careful that you don’t get a nosebleed from being so stuck up.
Keep firing Assholes!
I don't know what I'm talking aboot.
Do I think I'm better then wrestling fans?
In a word…yes.
by MMAFAN FO SHO on Feb 12, 2010 7:23 PM EST up reply actions
Sure...
If you disregard the fact that BROCKLESNARRRRR!!!!! has become the #2 HW in the world while Kimbo eeked out a decision against Alexander.
MMA is sort of in a formative period, so anyone that brings in oodles of new eyeballs is OK with ME
Keep firing Assholes!
I don't know what I'm talking aboot.
AGREED
He doesn’t have any weaknesses. I’ve only seen him in trouble once….ever.
by MMAFAN FO SHO on Feb 12, 2010 7:18 PM EST up reply actions
?????
hes been in trouble plenty of times, one of the things i love to watch in a fedor fight. Mark Hunt had him in an americana, AA was smacking him around, Rogers was doing well, randleman and the list goes on. Fedor struggles with fighters but he has this 6th sence and notices the first mistake a fighter makes and BANG its over.
Fedor is head and shoulders above the rest!
Watched all his fights, and won every single one. In the arona fight, it was a draw, then went to sudden death and fedor took it. watched it 5 times, fedor wins everytime, lol
As for brock, pleaseee if gets fedor pissed, he will put brock to sleep like a bear hibernating.
I'm only gonna rec this
If you actually ran into your bathroom, took a picture, uploaded it, and then posted it here.
Ask any fighter "Who's the Best" they'll shoot it straight.....
FEDOR…..Period. It’s funny reading all the bias BS. Ask Arona he’ll tell ya too. They’ll all say the same thing. Fedor Emelianenko is the Hardest Hitting Most Well Rounded Fighter (Ever).
Fedor is dangerous not because of his huge skill set people go on about (his striking is ok not great very flat footed and realy olny throws 1 or two punches not a big combo guy). As a displine of fighting his skill is sambo, his skill as a fighter is the ability to see openings and keep calm while waiting for them. AA was battering Fedor and i think its the first time i seen fedor fustrated but low and behold AA makes one mistake and its night night.
I will never understand why Randy Couture is ranked as highly as he is. It has been almost a decade since he won more than two fights in a row.
by thekiltedwonder on Feb 12, 2010 9:48 PM EST reply actions
In fairness to Randy, these are the people he has lost to since he turned 40: Vitor Belfort, Chuck Liddell, BROCKLESNAR, Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira. Nothing to be ashamed of there.
Certainly nothing to be ashamed of, but no one who loses that much can even be considered in a list like this.
How about the people he lost to before he turned 40? Ricco, Barnett, Valentjin Overeem, Mikhail Illoukhine, Enson Inoue. I can´t even tell who the last two are.
Enson Inoue can be read about here.
Hell of a fighter.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on Feb 13, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
Tim Sylvia/Gabe Gonzaga happened 10 years ago?
twitter.com/thisredengine
by Matthew Roth on Feb 15, 2010 1:27 PM EST up reply actions
Fight Finder isn’t your friend so yiou should stop talking about him like he is. In any list of all-time great HW’s it comes down to 4 main guys right now, Nog, Randy, Coleman and Fedor with the other spots up for grabs. Randy’s resume speaks for itself so does Nog’s, people know how I feel about the overatedness of non-zuffa fighter but out of respect for mma i’ll throw in Fedor and Coleman started it so he gets in.
The interesting thing to me will be the next 5 years which I believe will really help cement the next generation of great HW’s in mma. By then the list will look very different and should really hold more value since most older HW’s will be retired and we can judge their entire careers in full.
Advertising ignorance: Roling's hockey history.
Wayne Gretzky dominated the NHL in an era that was far tougher than today’s game. Perhaps hockey was less technical in those days, but the physical aspect of the sport was much more dominating. It wasn’t uncommon for players to headhunt constantly throughout a game without ever being penalized. Players could set picks, crush opponents without the puck, and cross check at will. Despite the tough environment, Gretzky always found a way to produce.
Whoever sold you these damaged goods should be exterminated from the information business.
The era in which Wayne Gretzky played was docile compared to the game that is played today. There is only one violent aspect that was more prevalent in the sport at that time : fighting. The instigator rule, where the player that initiates a fight receives two additional minutes of penalty did not come into effect until the late 80s, after Gretzky’s most formidable seasons had transpired. This means that an enforcer (read goon) could start fights without penalizing his team (both players received equal penalties), which enabled him to start fights with anyone who might initiate unwanted contact with the team’s stars (such as Wayne). Wayne was protected by Dave Semenko or Marty McSorely for much of his career, allowing him relatively free range to work his offensive magic without great fear of dire repercussions. Gretzky also benefited from playing prior to the trap.
Today, the instigator rule has reduced the opportunities for fighting and a new breed of hockey players has emerged: the head hunter. Generally unskilled with hockey sticks and pucks, this player has honed the skills of injuring other players while head hunting with their checks, and at times hitting opposing player after he no longer has possession of the puck (late check), and knee attacks. Thomas Kaberle of the Toronto Maple Leafs was a victim of a late hit delivered by Cam Jansen of the NJ Devils in 2007, requiring him to miss much of that season due to the concussion he received. Players who hit to cause maximum injury are relatively new in the sport. Prior to the instigator rule, there would have been immediate physical repercussions for Janssen that would usually allow a team to regulate (and limit) such attacks on their stars.
As for the other strange assertions in your text, hitting a player without the puck has never been allowed, nor has cross-checking.
The game of hockey is the most dangerous it has ever been. It is played faster, by larger athletes, who have more equipment and exercise no restraint in their hits. You hear players complain all the time how there is no respect on the ice anymore (more stick-work, head-hunting, knee attacks etc.).
All that being equal, Wayne Gretzky was my idol growing up and I consider him to be the greatest hockey player to have played the game, along side of Mario Lemieux and Bobby Orr.

by 















