Why does everyone love saying 'era'?
Is it me or is this word being bandied around a little too much. Machida wins the title and it's "The Machida era". It's the a new 'era' now that Ortiz was beaten. Brock's loss ushers in a new 'era'. Maybe it's just me, but can't we wait for a theme to show a steady pattern, for at least, I dunno, a couple of months?
Have we not learned our lesson after Rogan dramatically announced the Machida Era, that was symbolically ended the very next fight, and officially ended one rematch later? One solid punch from Carwin somewhere around Cain's chin could very well end Cain's reign to another gargantuan Heavy. Would this then end the era of technical athletes to a new era of gargantuan heavyweights?
I'm I being too thin skinned here? Is it too late and I just need a good nights' sleep? Can we stop trying to usher in new eras and just be brothers in MMA?
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
22 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The problem, I believe, stems from
the perceived dominance of Silva, GSP, Penn, and to a lesser extent Lesnar around late 2009/early 2010. Champs that seemed so far above everyone in their weight divisions that the only option was to have them fight each other. However, LHW had been in flux until that point, which didn’t mesh with fans’ perceptions of a pattern of unbeatable champs – so when the undefeated and largely unchallenged Machida knocked out Rashad in emphatic fashion, Rogan and everyone else just lumped him in with all the others as an unstoppable force. Thus began the trend of every fan wanting to be the first to predict the ‘beginning of an era’ prematurely.
When a ball goes into a net, it only means something because we decide it means something. When somebody punches somebody in the face it always means something.
by lowellthehammer on Oct 25, 2010 2:34 AM EDT reply actions
The other thing is that one has to look dominant in order to have the “era” tag. I have not heard too many speak of the Shogun Era and especially the Frankie Edgar Era. It does say a lot when a fighter is outclassing other fighters on the highest level. I mean, Machida destroyed Thiago Silva and Rashad Evans, and therefore got the “era” tag. With Velasquez, he defeated Brock Lesnar in the first round and has a skillset that no other MMA heavyweights have had (the cardio, conditioning, constant work, combined with the wrestling and striking).
Check out MMA For You at http://www.youtube.com/user/Gobusiness123 for MMA reviews, predictions, and analysis.
We’ve just entered the “Era” era.
You need to respect the baby... 'cause life is precious... and God... and the Bible.
by timetraveltome on Oct 25, 2010 4:02 AM EDT reply actions 6 recs
Whenever I see the word era
I think of those turntable scratching noises people make. You know – era, era.
"Do you find him to be, perhaps, sexier than the average human being?"
"I'm not gay, but..."
- Ariel Helwani and fan discussing Yoshihiro Akiyama
by crazybones on Oct 25, 2010 8:10 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
You are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!
There are only TWO eras in the UFC, the GSP ERA and the record-breaking Anderson Silva reign on the middleweight division. Those eras are just as legitimate as the Gracie era, the Matt Hughes era and of course the time when Chuck Liddell reigned supreme at light-heavyweight.
Although I should point out the the Liddell era is interesting in that it was 7 consecutive fights in which he only fought ONE new opponent in Vernon White, who had a (0-3 losses-1 draw) record in his past 4 fights. The rest of Liddell’s fights were rematches with Couture, Ortiz, Sobral and Jeremy Horn. Then Liddell was given a rematch against the last man to defeat him in Quinton Jackson and his career to a huge nose-dive. -My based on numbers Chuck Liddell Revisionist History without hype by Vee is Animated
Why does everyone love saying ‘era’?
They keep repeating it because they are followers. There’s little to no thought going on in analysis or interpretations of past fights or events. It is pretty much cut, copy and past journalism throughout the MMA media.
- - - - -
VEe is ANIMated!
Simply because it sounds so epic.
by Horselover Fat on Oct 25, 2010 9:44 AM EDT reply actions 3 recs
This. :-)
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Oct 25, 2010 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Yep. I also think that this being such a young sport, there’s an epic (another favorite overused term) desire to impart a sense of history and broad perspective to events, which contrasts poorly with the rapid turnover both of top fighters in the sport and the high speed internet news cycles. Another one of those things that illustrates an inferiority complex prevalent in MMA, where over-reactions to every singular event are the norm. “The sky is not falling” era is hopefully on the way. Though Diego’s crazy banshee slam on Thiago was, in fact, EPOCH MAKING!
What's this war in the heart of nature? Why does nature vie with itself? The land contend with the sea? Is there an avenging power in nature? Not one power, but two?
by Kwisatz Haderach on Oct 25, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s pretty good thinking there actually. However, I felt so satisfied with my one sentence answer that I refuse to expand upon it or discuss the matter further.
by Horselover Fat on Oct 25, 2010 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Your concision is epic.
What's this war in the heart of nature? Why does nature vie with itself? The land contend with the sea? Is there an avenging power in nature? Not one power, but two?
by Kwisatz Haderach on Oct 25, 2010 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions
It's because they watch sports on TBS and listen to Dick Stockton.
They’re actually saying “error.” I think it’s apt for the Lesnar “Era,” don’t you?
And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.
Because it’s easier to claim that a situation can be explained entirely by the presence of a single fighter than it is to explain and understand a complex and volatile situation that can change radically at any time. It means “I don’t feel like coming up with any actual analysis.”
On Saturday, Rogan was modifying his “era” with "truly. “Truly, a new era.”
I was going to write a fan post entitled "QUICKLY, everyone react the other way!"
but this post and BE kinda beat me to it. “It’s the cruiser-weight era now, and Carwin and Lesnar will have to drop to at least 240 if they want to remain competitive.” (Sarcasm, before the inevitable “what are you talking about!?!?” reply.)
I also think announcers like Rogan overuse the word era so much simply as a way to build up more hype for the champ. It’s not like Joe sits down at 1 every day and announces “the lunch era has just begun!”
Most of the problem is that marketing wants to capatlize on all the opportunities a new champ presents. Of course they are going to lead you to believe you better buy the champ’s walkout t now or new cain sombrero or before you know it you’ll be sorry. In fact, if the champ has a better chance of losing his title quicker, that’s all the more reason to get the hype train going as fast as possible.
Another big problem is the way mma is structured. There is no offseason, but there is signifcant time between fights for its champs. In a sport like baseball, after a champion is declared, then you have a long offseason and time for the team to be marketed, celebrated, hyped, etc. In mma, with no offseason, marketing needs to capatalize on the smaller, less ceratin window they have. This leads to overhyping anyone as soon as they get the strap, for fear that after one fight, there will be a new champ, and a chance to make a lot of $ will be lost.
It goes with the epic gladiator music that starts all the PPV
Also, we live in an era when we want to name the meme before it becomes a meme. We are all trend-setter attempters.
This is of course related to the “I liked them when they used to play at that one bar down from my dorm, but now that they play in 1,000 seat theaters, well…they’re just not as good. they’re too produced.”
Dammit, I was there when it was new and fresh, I spotted those mo-fos! I knew the start of an era before anyone else had a clue! I make proclamations! Listen to me!!
Yeah but that was so 90’s. No one’s doing that stuff today. I mean, if I were to say “Yeah I was a huge fan of Nirvana when they were just a Seattle thrash band playing Squid Row and pizza joints in Olympia before they even signed at Subpop” it would be true. Or if I was to say “sure, Alice and Chains ate BBQ in my backyard before they had even heard of Heroin…” it would be true, but i don’t go around saying that stuff. Because it makes people feel inferior, and we’re in a new era, one where people don’t really care about that stuff.

by 













