Reed Harris confirms WEC 48: Aldo vs. Faber will be a PPV card for $44.99 in May and says Tito Ortiz's remarks about Chuck Liddell being an alcoholic are full of sh*t. [at the 5:30 min mark]
HT: facebook.com/DaveAndMahoney
WEC 47: Bowles vs. Cruz coverage
over 2 years ago
Nick Thomas
53 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Over/Under
What do you guys think the over/under is on PPV buys for this one? 125k?
"For some reason Dana White doesn't like me, and I don't care enough to find out why. So he can go pound sand up his ass as far as I'm concerned."
Don Frye
by keyboardwarrior on Jan 29, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
When does the UFC charge $39.99?
I think they’re charging $5 UNDER a UFC PPV card.
"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal
This is retarted business practice! How are they thinking they will have a full card worth $50 freakin dollars? They should have put their toes in the water to check the temperature, because they might get burned here!
For $20 or $25 I probably woulda watched, guess ill be here for the play by play!
all you gotta do is...
by imapimp08 on Jan 29, 2010 2:20 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I love it when people label things as retarded, but don’t spell retarded correctly.
http://www.twitter.com/TB_Money
by Tim Burke on Jan 29, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Are you question-talking? Of course you are!

"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
I wanted to spell it like this...
Tarted
Because that’s what they are, tarted!
all you gotta do is...
by imapimp08 on Jan 30, 2010 1:34 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
definitely sounds like he's saying "44.95, same price" to me
but regardless, they are still out of their damn minds with that decision. unless the card is absolutely stacked, with several title defenses, i can’t see that many people paying that much.
My question is why in May?
We have Mayweather vs Mosely on the 1st, UFC 113 on the 8th, and UFC 114 on the 29th. No matter who else they put on this card it will come in fourth on the list of must buys for the month. How many fight fans will still have money to purchase this card if they’re already spending $150 on the other 3 events? And even worse they’ll probably end up going up against a Strikeforce card, which is basically free.
My guess is that it will bomb, which is unfortunate since I am a big fan of a lot of the WEC fighters.
by John Nash on Jan 29, 2010 2:27 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
If Strikeforce is smart...
then they’ll do exactly what you indicated… Strikeforce show on CBS or Showtime against the WEC PPV. Then we get to see if Zuffa will counter-program itself by putting UFC on Spike to counter Strikeforce which is itself countering WEC!
I still need to watch the interview, but this sounds like it has “worst idea since YAMMA” written all over it.
by mma_critic on Jan 29, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
If Strikeforce is smart…
Thanks for the disclaimer, I didn’t even have to read the comment to know it wouldn’t come true.
Yeah, fuckin' idiots...
Putting a football player on a card right before the Super Bowl and having him do ESPN appearances, a primetime series to introduce their future top fighters, a builder division that is separately branded, cornering the Us market on female MMA, and hijacking UFC’s Vera-Couture hype for their own Vera-Couture fight… They clearly are incapable of making smart decisions.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Did you...
even listen to the interview? He said $44.99, which I still think is too much.
I suspect they realize there will be a weaning period of low buys, as they have no marketing to casuals and their fanbase is kinda pissed at having to pay for what was once free milk. That said, even if it does 50000 buys, that’s a lotta money for the WEC.
"an excellent example of why most MMA "journalism" is a joke. Pseudonyms like "toxic" and shitty writing like that dopey article"--- Joe Rogan.
Fail of the Year top candidate
However, a fail here might just get the FWs and BWs in the UFC finally
great now the wec joins my ufc routine of having to watch it illegally online
ppvs suck for the fans
by milk72 on Jan 29, 2010 2:47 PM EST reply actions 5 recs
there aren’t any bars that play the fights? I can’t walk two blocks without some place showing them
by WestbergIDFC on Jan 29, 2010 4:26 PM EST up reply actions
I hope that's the price for ringside seats
I love the WEC but there is no way people will pay that much for the ppv.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i would never pay $45 for a WEC ppv EVERRRRRRR! LOL i would pay maybe $25 but even that is pushing it. y is zuffa so greedy?
$MOOTH MF'n MYKE BIATCH
I'll definitely be buying this PPV
I’ve refrained from buying the last several lackluster UFC PPVs but I expect the full card for WEC48 to be very entertaining.
Think; It's not illegal yet.
the only way...
is if they have 11 or 12 fights and they show every single one… wait i’d still be iffy
$MOOTH MF'n MYKE BIATCH
I’ve paid 29.99 for Yamma Pit Fighting and Ultimate Chaos so I don’t mind shelling out 44.95 for Faber/Aldo.
I’m available to prune your money tree on Wednesdays and Saturdays, sir.
by CaptnAmerca on Jan 29, 2010 3:21 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
This is going to bomb worse than the XFL.
The WEC is not nearly popular enough to make this a pay-per-view. But I guess we as consumers have to pay for everything IF we want to watch it.
I won’t watch it….legally.
Brian Russell would bite on play-action despite the QB being in an empty backfield.
I wonder how many people would be excited to be spending $45 on a ppv with Aldo/Faber as the main event if Thiago Silva/Rashad Evans and Yvel/JDS was on the undercard? Or Torres/Bowles with Coleman/Couture as the co-main event? Too bad we couldn’t somehow merge these cards together.
by John Nash on Jan 29, 2010 3:30 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
UFC has four deep and competitive weight classes and one top heavy yet competitive one.
WEC has two compelling weight classes with top athletes facing off, and one that is mid-tier talent fighting even weaker talent. Yeah, totally charge the same amount for half the available product.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 29, 2010 3:38 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Maybe it’s a ploy to shut up all the WEC guys belly aching about getting UFC PPV type money. This event will flop, the WEC will wash their hands of PPV events and stick to VS. When the next guy opens his mouth about PPV buyrate % based paydays, WEC brass will reference this event as a huge failure, since the aforementioned fighters couldn’t pull PPV buys.
But the end result is that actually Zuffa is hurting themselves by not merging the WEC champions into the UFC. If they would have incorporated the bantam- and featherweights when they bought the WEC , then Faber would have been involved in 6 title fights over the last two years and Torres would been involved in five. Both of these fighters would have easily been huge stars in the UFC, headlining ppv cards drawing 500,000 + buys. Torres and Faber would have been a lot wealthier and Zuffa would have done a lot better putting on a Faber or Torres title fight than non-title main events Silva vs Evans, Belfort vs Franklin, Rampage vs Jardine, or Hughes vs Alves.
by John Nash on Jan 29, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Hope they are happy
with 30-50k in PPV sales. I never even dream of buying that.
If the hardcores wont buy this because they feel they are being ripped off, and the casuals wont buy it because it doesn’t have UFC plastered all over it.. who do they think is going to pay that much?
by virginiatech on Jan 29, 2010 4:06 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Exactly.
Great post, you nailed it, this thing won’t do 100k buys. Hell, take UFC on Spike ratings for big big live shows, then take the WEC’s rating for their biggest live shows, and gague that vs the UFC’s biggest PPV numbers and you should pretty easily come up with a buy rate for this one. Actually, I suspect that buyrate will be a bit lower because many hardcores like myself will probably not buy this event in protest.
As a very hardcore fan, I'm not buying this in protest.....
If they want to give Faber, Brown, Torres, Aldo, Bowles and the WEC stars the money they deserve (through shared PPV revenues) then they need to fold BW and FW into the UFC and make the WEC the “minor leages” that it’s destined to be.
My cable bill is out of control already with Showtime, DVR, HD service, 1 sometimes 2 PPVs a billing cycle and internet service. I’m not paying a 300 dollar a month cable bill just because the Zuffa wants to control MMA programing on the Versus network, which is the only reason the WEC exists.
Now that the UFC is on Versus, why bother with the WEC FW and BW divisions, time for a merger.
by JimJoe on Jan 29, 2010 4:21 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I don't know
if I can justify paying $45 for this. I will be purchasing 3 PPV events in May, this won’t be one of them. I have been getting these fights free for years, and now I am expected to pay for the same fights? I think the WEC is one of the most exciting promotions on Earth but these fighters don’t have the exposure or press to carry a PPV card.
I was hoping WEC would become this generations “Friday Night Fights” and give us free MMA every week. Maybe Strikeforce can get the Challenger series on CBS so I can cancel Showtime.
...
It’s probably been said already…but a ppv featuring Aldo and the guy who lost to Mike Brown twice? and again as others have said i’m not sure i can buy this given the other events going down in may. Disappointing.
I guess one good thing is if this is successful guys like Aldo, Bowles, Brown, Torres and Faber will start getting bigger pay days..
no way in hell am i paying that much for wec
If they charge 19.99 they will get twice the audience , and make the same amount of money , maybe more. And more people will be happy and get to watch the fight and u wouldnt hear too much bitching.
Hey, half the people commenting here
Learn how to use the “reply” button, it makes conversations a helluva lot easier to follow.










![Reed Harris says the WEC could have three PPV events a year:
"I don't have the official numbers [for WEC 48] ... and it could take a couple months. [But] we had a number internally we were [aiming] for, and we far exceeded that according to the early estimates. I don't think that [three PPV shows a year] would be would something we couldn't attain."
HT: mmajunkie.com
WEC 48: Aldo vs. Faber coverage](http://cdn2.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/117108/qq1ohj_small.jpg)













