Snapshot of the Day: February / March Issue of UFC Magazine

Now on newsstands; it features Anderson Silva, Jamie Varner, Arianny Celeste, the Rise of the UFC in the UK, Brandon Vera, Rolles Gracie and Cain Velasquez.
HT: ufc.com, hdnetfights.com
UFC 112 coverage
0 recs |
153 comments
|
Comments
Did Joe Rogan write the “Why leg kicks win fights” article?
The mat is my church, the ground is my heaven, Jiu-Jitsu is my religion. And once you hit the ground you're in my world. My world is like the ocean, I’m like a shark and most people don't even know how to swim - Draculino
by AboveThisFire on Jan 21, 2010 2:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
"Why leg kicks win fights"
Cecil Peoples begs to differ.
by agentsmith on Jan 21, 2010 2:10 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Shogun won’t like that article…
Mauricio Shogun Rua #1 LHW in the World. The TRUE Champion.
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
by xFenixKnightx on Jan 21, 2010 2:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Shogun usually gives Anderson his props. He even recently stated that he thinks Anderson has the game to beat Fedor.
Happy Holidays and A Happy New Year
by VeeisAnimated on Jan 21, 2010 3:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he’s talking about the leg kick article
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 21, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
my bad . . . . and now I’m laughing hard!
Happy Holidays and A Happy New Year
by VeeisAnimated on Jan 21, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
best fighter in history?
child please.
"Newspapermen ask dumb questions. They look up at the sun and ask if it is shining."
-Sonny Liston
@mikefareri on twitter.
by sonofapsycho on Jan 21, 2010 2:23 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Best Part of This Magazine...
Danneel Harris. Yum.

Also, I’m going to pretend I didn’t hear that the guy who got beat by a couple of c-level Japanese welterweights is the greatest fighter ever.
by BradT on Jan 21, 2010 2:32 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
The current iteration of Anderson Silva is the greatest fighter ever, in my opinion. I think he would beat Fedor and he will beat GSP if that ever comes to fruition.
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 21, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
... beat Fedor.
How can you possibly beat Fedor, he’s powered by a nuclear reactor that will continue to function long after we’re all dead.
by rask4p on Jan 21, 2010 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Solution

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 21, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't this pic
from when he’s being lowered into the molten metal to be destroyed? Wait… I get it now. The only way to stop Fedor is to drop him into molten metal!
by rzor on Jan 21, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can see how a good showing against Forrest Griffin would lead you to believe he’d beat GSP and of course Fedor.
by The Darkness on Jan 21, 2010 10:52 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
What about a destruction of everyone he’s fought for the past 5 years?
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 22, 2010 6:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve never seen anyone “destroyed” with fewer effective strikes than Thales Leites (whom he lost two rounds to on one judges scorecard) and Patrick “the Predator” Cote.
He also “destroyed” a flabby, gassing Travis Lutter by managing to get taken down, have his guard passed, get mounted and fail to get out of mount until Lutter went for a sloppy arm bar. I know, I know, he’s improved so much since then. He uses a “body triangle” – there’s no way to pass his guard now. If only they could come up with a counter to the body triangle. Give me a break. Silva is awesome on his feet. He has a huge hole in his game. The MW division is a turd and he’s fought turds at LHW. If he beats Vitor convincingly maybe i’ll be willing to hug his nuts but I’m resistant to change.
by The Darkness on Jan 23, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What happens in Japan
, stays in Japan.
"You hit too hard, too hard, too hard..."
by spectaa on Jan 21, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh oh oh oh, can I play this game too?
GSP is overrated, because he lost to a guy that came off a reality show for UFC washouts!
BJ Penn is weak sauce at LW, because he got pwned by Jens Pulver.
Fedor hasn’t fought legit competition since Pride closed their doors.
by rzor on Jan 21, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah, I forgot how bad former UFC champions who are ranked top 10 and #2 in the world are.
What a bum that Fedor character is. How does he even sleep at night?
Seriously, you can’t just forget that Anderson has been beaten by some very poor opponents in his career. Fedor hasn’t.
by BradT on Jan 21, 2010 2:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes you can
While your toaster will always have the same functionality, fighters are capable of improving. Some drastically so. Like Anderson Silva.
Really ignorant and tired argument..
Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"
by Blackout612 on Jan 21, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Silva’s takedown defense is vastly improved based on his performance against all of the determined top wrestlers he’s faced since coming to the UFC.
by The Darkness on Jan 21, 2010 10:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, I'll agree that saying
best in “history” feels like a lot of hyperbole, but even with the losses in his past he’s made such a strong case with this run at the end of his career that he’ll be a reasonable candidate for this discussion for a long time. Fairly or not, the UFC is considered by most the tip of the spear for MMA now, and he’s beaten former and current champions in multiple weight classes in dominating fashion. So I’m not saying those losses don’t count, but even with those losses, he’s still one of the best ever, which says a lot about what he’s accomplished.
by rzor on Jan 21, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Completely Agree
It’s just when people act like Anderson is the undisputed greatest fighter in the history of mankind, and somehow dismiss a portion of his career where he was essentially a mid-level fighter that pisses me off.
Anderson has been one of the best fighters in the sport for about 3.5 years, Fedor has been there for 7 years. There’s a pretty big disparity there, and I don’t feel like Anderson has done enough in the past 3 years to completely close the gap.
by BradT on Jan 21, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok.
He is currently one of the greatest fighters of all time. You think Jack Dempsy started boxing at the same skill level he had when he dominated? Get out of here with that shit.
PS: You don’t have to be undefeated to be considered one of the best. Pacman and Mayweather are considered to be equally dangerous, despite the fact that only Money May still has his 0.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 21, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And...
A lot of people think Mayweather has kept his precious 0 by ducking the fighters who had a real shot at blemishing his record. Meanwhile Pacman has taken on all comers, including guys with much bigger frames than him.
Although Fedor’s reasons may be legitimate, there’s no way to get around the fact that his decisions over the past few years have kept him from facing off against the best fighters in the HW division. Silva, on the other hand has dispatched all the best guys at 185 — some of them twice — and has taken on tough LHWs.
Combine that with the traditional thinness of the heavyweight division in MMA and I think you have a pretty decent argument that Silva is the best P4P MMA fighter in the most competitive era in the history of the sport.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on Jan 21, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You misunderstood me.
Although I believe Fedor is the greatest MMA fighter to live, I do not care to dispute claims that Anderson is greater because there are very compelling arguments for either. I take no offense to Anderson being called the greatest. I was actually defending Anderson by saying his prior losses are all but irrelevant and a fighter does not need to be undefeated to be the greatest.
Again, my belief is that Fedor is the greatest. Countless professional fighters and commentators agree. Many people believe Anderson is the greatest. Countless professional fighters and commentators agree. I have no interest in arguing between Coke and Pepsi, we don’t need a definitive winner, and we all agree that they beat the shit out of RC.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 21, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I love
RC
"I will do nothing lightly. When I walk, I will walk heavily. When I fight, I will fight with conviction. When I speak, I will speak strongly. When I love, I will love with everything"
by dedstrk316 on Jan 21, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
what about Moon Pies?
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 21, 2010 6:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
me me me!
Brock is overrated because he only has 3 wins over fighters with a winning record!
"You don't come to have your fingernails or your toenails painted. Goddamn, you come to fight, not to be a fairy."
Don Frye
by keyboardwarrior on Jan 21, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus he totally lost once, so he’ll never be better then Fedor, even if he beats him.
Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"
by Blackout612 on Jan 21, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well, Fedor lost once also, but if Brock loses twice, thats game over!
"You don't come to have your fingernails or your toenails painted. Goddamn, you come to fight, not to be a fairy."
Don Frye
by keyboardwarrior on Jan 21, 2010 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but he didn't really lose!
People still call him undefeated.
Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"
by Blackout612 on Jan 21, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn’t it convenient to completely disregard one fighter’s (quite embarrassing) losses, but claim another’s (much older) loss, due to a cut from an illegal strike, which was only declared a loss for the purposes of advancing a fighter in a tournament, is somehow valid?
by BradT on Jan 21, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sugar Ray Robinson lost 19 fights. ESPN thinks he’s the greatest boxer of all time. Floyd Mayweather has a perfect record, he’s at 48.
Maybe records aren’t everything, and a couple losses at the start of a career really shouldn’t weigh against a brilliant 4 year streak?
And not to piss on Fedor, cause the man is awesome, but his record is heavily padded with guys who wish they were C-level.
"an excellent example of why most MMA "journalism" is a joke. Pseudonyms like "toxic" and shitty writing like that dopey article"--- Joe Rogan.
by toxic on Jan 21, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The entire
Debate of the greatest fighter is purely speculative. Everyone has their opinion and really none can be proven right or wrong.
"You don't come to have your fingernails or your toenails painted. Goddamn, you come to fight, not to be a fairy."
Don Frye
by keyboardwarrior on Jan 21, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, obviously this is a classic “it’s all subjective” argument, but then throwing around records like the win/loss ratio is the only thing that matters is a pretty flawed way of going at the problem. It gives a false sense of objectivity.
"an excellent example of why most MMA "journalism" is a joke. Pseudonyms like "toxic" and shitty writing like that dopey article"--- Joe Rogan.
by toxic on Jan 21, 2010 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He’s also defeated the #1 HW in the world once, #2 3 times (3rd Nog fight, CC fight, and a bunch of other top 10’s (Sylvia, Rogers, Mark Hunt – yes he was still top 10 at that point, and Herring).
Anderson defeated the #1 MW once, #2 3 times (Franklin 2, Nate, Dan), no other top 10 MW’s (as much as the UFC tried to pretend, neither Cote or Leites was), a top 10 LHW, and one top 5 WW early in his career (Mach), which a ton of people overlook.
Their resumes are equal and they both have convincingly stopped a majority of their recent fights. How do you break the tie? Well, one has been doing it twice as long.
by BradT on Jan 21, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
One is also fighting in the weakest division in MMA by several magnitudes.
Guillotine.
by iiowyn on Jan 21, 2010 8:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson also defeated Mach at 170 way back in the day. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe that Mach was considered #1 WW at the time. Plus add in the fact that Anderson has improved drastically since then.
I think the overall point everyone is trying to make though, is the fact that Fedor is “undefeated” (which he isn’t, and probably wouldn’t be if all his fights were under unified rules also) is pretty irrelevant to this debate.
by jhf884 on Jan 21, 2010 10:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mach was also considered top p4p fighter.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 5:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Can I play too?!
Chuck Liddell would have lost to Alistair Overeem if it were under unified rules for the knees to the head.
Stupid effing argument. You fight to the rules you are under, and the unified rules are no more or less arbitrary than PRIDE rules.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My point here was more that he benefited by the rules he fought under as well as got hurt by them. Not that one set of rules is better than another.
I guess I should have been more clear though. But what you’re saying supports what I was trying (poorly) to say. You don’t get to bitch about the rules you fight under when convenient, and then helpfully forget the times they played in your favor.
by jhf884 on Jan 22, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
To confirm what you are saying...
You are saying that since he beat Arona only by the rules which he fought under, that the loss on his record should count because of the rules in place? Is that what you’re getting at?
The two situations are not analogous. One was Fedor fighting to the judges and rules. The other was him being hit by a strike that was clearly against the rules. It would be like if Yushin Okami was given a loss against Anderson Silva for that illegal yet totally effective (and awesome as fuck) upkick just to keep a tournament moving.
And for the record, when talking about Fedor, I do not call him undefeated just to avoid controversy. He’s beaten every man he has faced and is on a 27 fight undefeated streak… that’s plenty impressive.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fedor is indeed impressive. Even for a Cyborg!
The premise I have that makes me think the situations are analogous is this – the fight was in a tournament structure and the rules didn’t allow for NC or DQ. If one fighter couldn’t continue, he was given a loss, regardless of if the reason he couldn’t continue was an elbow etc.
I could be wrong about that – maybe it was just post facto incompetence. In that case I’d take your point. Otherwise, I think the situations are analogous – Silva claims he didn’t realize/ he wasn’t told that kicks to the head of grounded figher’s weren’t allowed. Fedor could make a similar claim.
All will agree that both were clearly superior that night, official win or no. But I still treat both as having lost that night.
Finally, I agree with about Fedor being impressive – but I’m more impressed by who he’s beaten. Less impressed by the mere fact that he has an “0” (if you don’t count that fight, obv.).
by jhf884 on Jan 22, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As I understand it
the tournament didn’t have an alternate bout and didn’t plan for anyone to not be able to continue. Since they couldn’t send Fedor forward with his cut and they didn’t want a loser to move forward, they gave Kohsaka the official win despite the fact that he flagrantly broke the rules. Either way, Fedor messed his shit up a few years later so even if it was an official loss, it was brutally avenged.
And I’m totally with you on the 0 issue. Pacqiao has losses. KO losses. Mayweather has his 0 still. They are still pretty interchangeable on p4p lists. Even though I think Fedor is #1, I do not argue against those who put Anderson above him. When I do my p4p lists I give the top spot to whoever fought more recently because it’s not worth even arguing with myself on the issue. Both men are destroyers of worlds.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And the #4 LHW brutally (ABOVE HIS WEIGHT KNTHX)
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Jan 22, 2010 9:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Totally not what happened
And I also think your sarcasm meter is broken.
Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"
by Blackout612 on Jan 21, 2010 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well, I happen to be in that camp that believes Fedor’s loss was due to an illegal strike but because of the tournament someone had to be declared a winner. Actually, I don’t really consider than an opinion so much as a fact.
"You don't come to have your fingernails or your toenails painted. Goddamn, you come to fight, not to be a fairy."
Don Frye
by keyboardwarrior on Jan 21, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well brock’s loss was due to legal leg lock that came due to a questionable standup.
You can either read into records more than what’s there, or you can take the records for what they are, you can’t do a little of each when it pleases your case a little more.
by Phildo on Jan 21, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There’s still a difference between a subjective judgment call, and something clearly outlined in the rules.
That’s not reading more into records than what’s there.
by BradT on Jan 21, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn’t it clearly outlined in the rules before Fedor’s loss that a cut would = a loss? I don’t get your complaint here. That was the rule-set he agreed to fight under. I also seem to recall – but am to lazy to go rewatch all those fights! – that at least one of his decision wins in Rings was pretty questionable.
Look, I think Fedor is great. But the “undefeated” argument really gets overblown.
by jhf884 on Jan 21, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn’t it clearly outlined in the rules before Fedor’s loss that a cut would = a loss?
It was also outlined that elbows would be illegal, and he was cut by en elbow.
by JRN on Jan 22, 2010 4:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
His win over Arona was questionable. To me Fedor clearly lost that fight. Glad to see that I’m not the only one.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 5:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
THIS
he lost to Arona. his ‘undefeated’ record should be called into question more than Machidas, imo
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Jan 22, 2010 9:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great point.
He got worked over by Arona that whole fight.
As Matt Hamill would say, his record is correct, but it didn’t get there correctly. Or something like that.
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
by misterjonez on Jan 22, 2010 6:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
SARCASM
Everyone alright this afternoon? I personally think Fedor is the greatest fighter of all time, but people pointing out Anderson’s old losses as an indication of who he is as a fighter today and what his place will eventually be in this sport’s history are completely ignorant.
Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"
by Blackout612 on Jan 21, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
agree on both accounts
"You don't come to have your fingernails or your toenails painted. Goddamn, you come to fight, not to be a fairy."
Don Frye
by keyboardwarrior on Jan 21, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
GSP is overrated, because he lost to a guy that came off a reality show for UFC washouts!
BJ Penn is weak sauce at LW, because he got pwned by Jens Pulver.
Restated a bit, these would both be fine reasons for not considering someone “the greatest fighter in history,” which is what’s actually at issue here, not whether someone is overrated generally.
Fedor hasn’t fought legit competition since Pride closed their doors.
Unlike the two above, this is just factually untrue. (OK, one could argue that Penn didn’t get “pwned,” he just lost, and that TUF 4 wasn’t entirely “washouts,” but you get what I’m saying.)
None of these statements is analogous or equivalent to “Anderson Silva is not the greatest ever because he lost to Ryo Chonan and Daiju Takase.”
by JRN on Jan 21, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Since you have a well thought out breakdown
I owe you the same.
I mentioned those three fighters specifically because all three have been mentioned, alongside Anderson, as among the greatest ever. I then provided what I felt were very tenuous reasons each of them could be discounted as best. All three reasons were supposed to be untrue, and thus a humorous and slightly mean-spirited way to disprove the argument that Anderson is not considered the best due to his past losses. In other words, it was a joke.
This joke immediately losses it’s impact when someone takes it seriously and tries to break it down, point-by-point; however, it works its way back to funny again when it’s followed by an excessively long explanation for why it was supposed to be funny in the first place.
by rzor on Jan 21, 2010 3:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I then provided what I felt were very tenuous reasons each of them could be discounted as best. All three reasons were supposed to be untrue, and thus a humorous and slightly mean-spirited way to disprove the argument that Anderson is not considered the best due to his past losses. In other words, it was a joke.
Sure, but the joke only works if all three are actually untrue. Only one of them was!
by JRN on Jan 21, 2010 5:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
“Why Leg Kicks Win Fights”?… really? Maybe these type of leg kicks.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Jan 21, 2010 2:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
silva all day hate all you want thats the way it is
“c-level Japanese welterweights” how long was that and when was the last time he was beaten
by staytrue2010 on Jan 21, 2010 2:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Four years ago, as of yesterday.
Loss to Yushin Okami by DQ (knocking him the fuck out in a totally awesome but totally not allowed in ROTR fashion)
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 21, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Leg Kicks
For one time, UFC should allow soccer kicks and knees to the head. I just think that would be a fantastic idea. Who doesn’t love soccer kicks to the head.
by MMA42 on Jan 21, 2010 3:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Regulating bodies.
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 21, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Saku doesn't like knees to the head

by dancingChicken on Jan 21, 2010 6:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good thing he isn’t in the UFC.
Guillotine.
by iiowyn on Jan 21, 2010 8:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Akihiro Gono, Yuki Kondo, and Frank Mir are not fans.



Walking the line between intelligence and ignorance since 1985
@deowade
by Deo Wade on Jan 21, 2010 6:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh man, I love Dana White’s editing skills.
by MMAEruption on Jan 21, 2010 3:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well, Anderson Silva IS the best fighter in UFC history. So the cover is actually sort of right.
He’s 11-0 and finished 9 of those fights. That’s better than Chuck, GSP, BJ, Randy, Tito, Hughes, and anyone else ever did inside the Octogon.
by MMAEruption on Jan 21, 2010 3:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
AM I THE ONLY ONE
that would pay money to watch Silva fight while wearing that suit?
The path to my fixed purpose is laid with iron rails, whereon my soul is grooved to run. Towards thee I roll, thou all-destroying but unconquering BROCKLESNAR; to the last I grapple with thee.
by judonerd on Jan 21, 2010 4:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I like that the UFC is trying to build a universe, where no fighter is worth anything nor does he exist, unless he is signed with the UFC.
by grein on Jan 21, 2010 4:16 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
how dare they try to operate a viable business!!!
by Phildo on Jan 21, 2010 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree grein. It is good business, but there is no independent authority analyzing this stuff. Bloody Elbow, let’s do a rankings and vote on it!
by b_radical on Jan 21, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Guess what? that’s the media’s job, to do this stuff, not the companies involved.
by Phildo on Jan 21, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And how dare they make a supportable assertion
that one of the top 2 pound for pound MMA fighters might be the greatest MMA fighter?! Inconceivable!
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 21, 2010 5:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, Anderson.
You don’t get to be the best fighter in history without at least having a signature guillo… err, victory. Fedor has a few of them in Cro Cop and Big Nog x2, GSP has BJ Penn, Big Nog has Cro Cop. You get the idea.
Sure, a fighter can have a long list of impressive victories over good competition, as is the case with Anderson, and be considered great. But we’re talking about the greatest here. When we look at The Spider’s career, what stands out as the shining moment where we all look at a fight or two and say “Yep, that’s why he’s the greatest”? I don’t see it.
I specializes in grammar fail.
by a tommy point on Jan 21, 2010 5:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I would say your point is taken, but Hendo and Rich Franklin X2 is pretty significant. Point taken however.
by b_radical on Jan 21, 2010 5:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus a complete destruction of the former LHW champ, who has signature wins of his own against Rampage and Shogun.
by Velcro on Jan 21, 2010 6:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
His signature is when he starts doing matrix shit and landing 3 blows while dodging the other guys punches like they are punching through water.
"an excellent example of why most MMA "journalism" is a joke. Pseudonyms like "toxic" and shitty writing like that dopey article"--- Joe Rogan.
by toxic on Jan 21, 2010 5:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s not what I am referring to.
I specializes in grammar fail.
by a tommy point on Jan 21, 2010 5:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I definitely think that Anderson’s absolute destruction of Forrest Griffin was a pretty good example of exactly what you’re saying.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito Ortiz on Vitor Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Jan 21, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It needs to sit for 2 years.
Then it will be part of MMA lore. The man who moved up in weight to a top 5 opponent. An opponent who was very recently champion. An opponent still in his prime. An opponent who got totally effing TOOLED on and embarrassed so badly that he ran out of the arena and dodged the media for over a month, only doing an interview with a friend of his and still being a dick about the fight through that. That is the power of Anderson Silva’s grace and awesomeness.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 21, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
It was a very good win for Anderson but I definitely would bet GSP to beat the number 5 middleweight of the UFC (who is it , Sonnen or Maia?) , and I would put money on BJ against the number 5 welterweight . If it’s not GSP , Alves or Fitch I think BJ wins. That’s of course only speculation…
by JoelMan on Jan 22, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree.
The only thing Forrest had going for him in that fight was his size. In hindsight, it’s pretty clear to see that Griffin had virtually no shot of winning. Though, to be far, not many were picking an upset by Forrest at the time.
Forrest is a name fighter, but I don’t think he has ever really struck fear into anyone’s hearts. Anderson most definitely won that fight in a dominating, other-worldly, crowd-pleasing fashion, but let’s not get carried away with the result. Context matters here, as the skill level wasn’t even remotely close between the two. Forrest simply isn’t the caliber of fighter where anyone should be surprised if he gets thoroughly embarrassed by an elite fighter inside the cage.
I would consider Anderson Silva beating a Gegard Mousasi, Lyoto Machida, or someone else along those lines, as one of those shining moments that leaps off of a fighter’s record and says “I’m the greatest and don’t you ever forget it.” It doesn’t even have to be in spectacular fashion. A clear decision goes a long way, too.
I specializes in grammar fail.
by a tommy point on Jan 21, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I had tentatively picked Forrest
via heart, size, and hoping that Anderson wouldn’t do much cardio work so he would be big enough at 205, causing him to fade while Forrest picked up pace in the later rounds. I was so wrong. So unbelievably wrong. I’ve never been wronger in my entire life. I actually won the undisputed wrongweight title. It was the worst fight prediction I’ve made in my life, and I had Mir over Lesnar at 100.
And what are you talking about, name fighter? Forrest was ranked number three or four in the world when Anderson did that. Two fights before that, he won the belt. Before Rashad took the belt from him, he had beaten Shogun and Rampage in a row. He’s currently number five. I’d put Lil Nog and Mousasi above him, but even then he’d still be seventh ranked in the world and a weight class up. Anderson vs. Forrest was epic matchmaking, and an epic outcome.
There’s one thing you have right. In hindsight, it was so obvious. Most things are, particularly fights.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 21, 2010 8:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Forrest is a very good fighter. A name fighter. People know him for what he does: fight. They know him because of the reality show; because he’s had some pretty darn good success in the cage. But, even when he was champ, I don’t think too many people were lining up to say that Forrest was among the most skilled fighters in the world (a group I would say consists of the Fedors, Silvas, GSPs, BJ Penns, Big Nogs, etc). Rather, it was, as I think you rightly alluded to in your prediction, that Forrest achieved his success largely through having incredible determination to go along with the skills he does have.
That isn’t to say Forrest is some terribly unskilled guy who just lucked into everything. He’s a very good fighter. It’s just that no one should be surprised if Forrest were to get embarrassed by an elite fighter. If Machida, or the rejuvenated Shogun, clowned him, would you be shocked? Let’s suppose Lil Nog finished him in 45 seconds. Shocked? Let’s go down a rung or two on the LHW ladder. What if Thiago Silva walked across the cage and dropped him instantly? Or Jon Jones did some ninja shit and put his lights out? Would those outcomes really surprise anyone?
Hindsight is a major part of these silly GOAT debates we fans have. When considering the records of fighters, what we know after the fact is every bit as important as what we were thinking at the time. Was Griffin/Silva a big fight? Yep. Were we watching Anderson Silva demolish someone who, in reality, posed any real danger to him? Nope. We shouldn’t exclude the latter simply because we were excited to see a fight.
Perhaps, as you said above, more time is needed. Maybe Forrest will do some things in the future that prove my opinion of his limitations incorrect. It just doesn’t seem that likely.
I specializes in grammar fail.
by a tommy point on Jan 21, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
When considering the records of fighters, what we know after the fact is every bit as important as what we were thinking at the time
Hence why so many people argue Fedor has fought scrubs since 2005.
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Jan 22, 2010 9:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Franklin was #1 MW when he got beat, wasn’t he? And he didn’t just get beat, he got owned.
Forrest was top 5 LHW. He looked like a 5 year old girl.
Henderson held 2 pride belts simultaneously. Rampage couldn’t finish him. Again, Silva does it in 2 rounds.
All of these dudes I consider more legit than Mousasi (in terms of accomplishment, if not in terms of talent), and Lyoto is the guy Anderson most consistently says he won’t fight. But, seriously, what more do you want?
by jhf884 on Jan 21, 2010 11:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We're talking talent here.
The same can be said about Franklin as Griffin in my tl;dr post above. What we learn after the fact is every bit as important. Franklin and Griffin just don’t measure up. Not even close.
Hendo is someone we could make a case for. If they fought again, I wouldn’t be 100% convinced that Anderson would win.
I just want Anderson to have a victory over someone who poses a serious, serious threat to him before he enters GOATdom. Someone who’s skills don’t instantly tie one arm behind his back before he even steps into the cage with Anderson. Maybe Vitor is that guy. Beating Rich Franklin, Hendo, and Forrest Griffin, no matter the level of domination, doesn’t scream GOAT to me.
As for Machida fighting Anderson, Lyoto’s dad seems eager for it to happen. So, who knows on that one. We can hope.
I specializes in grammar fail.
by a tommy point on Jan 21, 2010 11:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you're basically saying
that because he’s soo much better than everyone else that guys like Dan Henderson, Rich Franklin, Nat Marquardt, and Forrest Griffin don’t count as notable victories.
I'm like PacMan fightin you silly kids... throw ya Hatton the ring, and get knocked outlike Ricky did.
lol.
by Loot on Jan 22, 2010 5:22 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
He needs to beat someone good...
…like Anderson Silva.
Tatum: I think he's a good man. I like him. I got nothing against him, but I'm definitely gonna make orphans of his children.
by Monte Fisto on Jan 22, 2010 9:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
First, I don’t think Hendo should be lumped in with the rest of those names in that context. Griffin and Franklin are definitely notable victories. Hendo is a notch above that, imo.
Second, it’s certainly possible that Anderson simply is that much better than everyone he’ll ever face. So, we may never get to see him truly tested.
That said, I disagree. I’m saying that the majority of the victories fans point to as being proof of Anderson’s GOATdom aren’t as impressive — though, still impressive — as they’re made out to be, given what we’ve learned about those opponents after the fact and what we already knew about their skill-sets going into those respective fights.
Fighter X beats Dan Henderson, Forrest Griffin, and Rich Franklin. Is that really enough to become GOAT? That’s the question. Hendo is his biggest victory, without question. Not something anyone should slight. But Hendo has also been beaten by people who I don’t consider to be as talented as Anderson.
I still have to see more before I start calling him the best ever.
I specializes in grammar fail.
by a tommy point on Jan 22, 2010 4:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Greatest Fighter in History
1. I will admit I am biased, Silva is far and above my favorite fighter in the history of the sport.
2. I hate it when “Greatest in History” titles are put out. It is very subjective. What defines greatest in history? All of the people we are discussing are the greatest in MODERN history. If you were analyzing this for say … guitar players, generally Hendrix is considered, S. Ray, etc. Hendrix is only the greatest because he was such an innovator, modern guitar players can play his stuff as good or better. His influence cannot be matched. If we are going to actually go down this road of who is the “greatest of all time” then we need to caveat this analysis with greatest in modern history. Otherwise you have to consider guys from the past.
3. What I wish we could analyze is who is the greatest Martial Arts Movie Star of all time (in terms of actual martial arts skills, not acting ability) – My vote, Steven Seagal.
by b_radical on Jan 21, 2010 5:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Seagal is
A badass.
"I will do nothing lightly. When I walk, I will walk heavily. When I fight, I will fight with conviction. When I speak, I will speak strongly. When I love, I will love with everything"
by dedstrk316 on Jan 21, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I say Bruce Lee, that man could do things Seagal could only dream of.
"Everyone has a game plan, untell they get hit." -Mike Tyson
by mma is #1 on Jan 21, 2010 5:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
haha wtf!?!?
"Everyone has a game plan, untell they get hit." -Mike Tyson
by mma is #1 on Jan 21, 2010 6:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is HORRIBLE
But hilarious
Walking the line between intelligence and ignorance since 1985
@deowade
by Deo Wade on Jan 21, 2010 9:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
For sure
It’s not even a question. Chuck Norris is #2.
"I will do nothing lightly. When I walk, I will walk heavily. When I fight, I will fight with conviction. When I speak, I will speak strongly. When I love, I will love with everything"
by dedstrk316 on Jan 21, 2010 6:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hendrix is the greatest…. no debate. Stevie Ray would admit as much, may he rest in peace. The only person that might have matched him over time was Duane Allman, but he was taken so soon.
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 21, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
After later opening for the Jimi Hendrix Experience, Hendrix named Gibbons his favorite guitar player during an appearance on “The Tonight Show With Johnny Carson.”
"I will do nothing lightly. When I walk, I will walk heavily. When I fight, I will fight with conviction. When I speak, I will speak strongly. When I love, I will love with everything"
by dedstrk316 on Jan 21, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't start this, son.
Hendrix is one of the best guitarists at being overrated, although Eric Clapton is a runaway for the number one spot on that list (fucker can’t write anything by himself). Jeff Beck was doing similar things better six years before either of them, but it was studio work that he didn’t get much credit for. Not to mention that Hendrix really only had two tricks: pentatonics and wah. The only song he’s done that stands the test of time is Little Wing, which is fucking brilliantly done.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 21, 2010 7:42 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
This debate will be worse than any Zuffa/Strikeforce discussion. So I won’t start. But you will be smited by the guitar gods for your blasphemy.
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 21, 2010 7:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just to add some more fun…Herschel Walker is over-rated… ;)
Guillotine.
by iiowyn on Jan 21, 2010 8:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m gonna come back to my place in a few hours, after drinking a lot, and then respond to this.
We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.
by Robert Downey Sr. on Jan 21, 2010 9:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have to agree with you there. Hendrix is supremely overrated. I love Jimi and his music, but the best guitar player of all time? Child, please.
As far as playing the guitar with technique, speed, skill, and precision, Shawn Lane was the best guitarist I’ve ever seen. He’s deceased now, but check him out on youtube, ridiculous guitar skills.
Follow me on twitter @Joe_Schmitt21
by Joe Schmitt on Jan 21, 2010 10:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
THANK YOU!
Shawn Lane is hands down the greatest guitar player I have ever heard. And it’s not just his technique, he had beautiful styled phrasing and a sharp mind for composition and improv. Grey Pianos Flying is the best “guitar music” song in history. And, to go full circle, his version of All Along the Watchtower is otherworldly. The only one that comes close is Michael Hedges.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Django Reinhardt
Played fantastic guitar with a crippled fret-hand – just two working fingers. Incredible music.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Jan 22, 2010 2:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Tony Iommi of Black Sabbath
is missing fingertips. Not the level of Django’s burnt hand, but he’s still good an messed up.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But yah, I think Silva could beat any fighter they put in front of him, Fedor included.
by b_radical on Jan 21, 2010 5:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is actually the heart of the debate.
Anderson Silva is without question the best fighter on the planet right now, and most people would give him an edge against pretty much anyone who didn’t have an extra 100lbs of meat against him. That doesn’t make him the greatest of all time, but it does make him the best fighter on the planet, in that he could pretty much clown anyone in the world using UFC rules.
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
by misterjonez on Jan 21, 2010 9:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson is that you . . . only kidding. Fedor would take Silva down and “clown” him on the ground. If Lutter, Carlos Newton, Hendo, Takase, etc. can pass Silva’s guard there is no way that Fedor would have any trouble doing so. No question. Period. End of debate. Etc.
Fedor’s take downs also tend to be throws so he often ends up in side control.
Who would win? Who knows? I do know that Fedor would be a significant favorite in that fight in the eyes of the betting public, although obviously not in yours.
by The Darkness on Jan 21, 2010 11:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If Fujita could make Fedor fish dance, Silva would kick his head of. The same logic.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 6:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The theoretical question is what is more likely – Fedor taking Silva down or Silva KO’ing Fedor before he manages to do it . Given Fedor’s speed and power and good take downs I think it’s very reasonable to think Fedor would take him down first. As the guy said Anderson isn’t really great at preventing take downs.
Besides Fedor might hold his own with Anderson standing up. Too bad we’ll never get to see that…
by JoelMan on Jan 22, 2010 8:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson is not afraid of takedowns, that’s why he often does flying knees, kicks and other crazy stuff (and sometime gets taken down). He flew his shit in the fight with Lutter, Henderson, Marquardt, after those attacks he was taken down. People are talking about him like he’s some kind of Kongo guy: you grab him and he goes down.
Besides the guy above is obviously biased, as you can see in the comment below.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 9:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Look no one knows what happens in that fight and it will probably never even happen (unless Anderson goes crazy and joins Strikeforce before he retires to fight Fedor …hmmm actually doesn’t sound that crazy). But comparing Fedor to guys like Lutter or even Henderson or Griffin is underestimating what Fedor can do . Fedor may be small but he’s stronger than most heavyweights (look at his Rogers fight , phsyically it was Fedor who was more imposing , when he lost positions it was due to sub attempts).
No one knows what will happen but it will definitely be a different fight for Anderson than the Rich Franklins and Dan Henderson’s of the world…
by JoelMan on Jan 22, 2010 10:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not comparing anyone, I pointed out situations in which Silva was taken down. I know that Fedor is 2 weight classes above Spider and has good chances to take him down.
But take in consideration that fight (that will never happen) with Spider will be different than those with Sylvia’s, Arlovski’s and Rogers’ of the world.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
U know what ? I’d like to see Anderson take on someone like Rogers or Arlovski or even Sylvia and win . I don’t think any of them would be easy fights for him (hmm maybe Andrei because he has no chin :) ).
Seriously Anderson should take more fights in LHW or maybe even HW…he cleaned the division anyways (sorry Nate , u still don’t have a chance).
All and all Silva is an amazing fighter that’s for sure .
by JoelMan on Jan 22, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, If 210 lbs guy fights 270 – 280 lbs guy it’s definitely not easy. That’s why we have weight classes.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well u just hinted that Anderson can beat Fedor , probably the best heavyweight in the world at the moment (when Brock returns we might argue) , so …
Besides I get the feeling that Anderson wants to test himself , it’s probably gonna be against Machida or Shogun soon unless something unexpected happens . He’ll want to finish with a bang for sure . I hope he tries heavyweight too before the end , we’ll never know if he doesn’t try …
by JoelMan on Jan 22, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know I’m speculating but seriously , after Belfort he can go up . Nate isn’t really intriguing , I doubt Silva would want that fight and he was talking about retirement . So I don’t see why not . The big money fights are definitely a weight class up (or even too).
Silva vs Machida or Silva vs Shogun would be epic .
by JoelMan on Jan 22, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There is a possibility, but I didn’t say it would be easy.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe the fandom on here.
You’re getting bagged for suggesting that Anderson has avenues for victory against Fedor. Ugh. Neither guy would have an easy night if that matchup was made. You at least have my support.
And can I just mention that they have some great journalists working for that magazine? Because we haven’t even read the article and are still racking up comments about the teaser on the cover. We got played, son.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Huh ? Who bagged him ? We were just having a discussion and I explained why I think Fedor would be a different fight than Griffin or Henderson and that Silva may have difficulties against other heavyweights as well.
Can Silva beat Fedor ? Sure can. Does he have the better odds ? Not imo…
by JoelMan on Jan 22, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously biased because I’m not convinced that Silva is the GOAT? That’s preposterous.
People who truly love a fighter have an amazing ability to magnify his strengths and minimized or completely ignore his weaknesses, in spite of any evidence to the contrary. The parallels such people have to the devoutly religious are interesting. I’d be interested to know whether the people who view Anderson as an invincible warrior god king and embodiment of all that’s great in MMA are also religious. Are you?
by The Darkness on Jan 22, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Who said that Silva is invincible god king warrior? Those kind of assumptions make life easier, but that’s not what I’ve said. I’m not Silva’s worshiper. Yes, wrestling is the weakest part of his game, yes Fedor would be favourite in the two would fight (he’s 2 weight classes higher for god’s sake). Would the fight be over once it’d hit the ground? I’m not so sure.
Biased part: Revisionism of Silva’s opponents. It’s silly game and we could play it all day.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 2:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fedor is no bigger than Forrest, while Anderson is a pretty huge MW.
So the “two weight classes up!” statement, while true, is somewhat misleading. And I really think that if an Anderson vs. Fedor fight was booked, odds would come in around something like -140 for Fedor, EV for Anderson.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think that 210 is huge. Alves is almost 200 in WW.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He's out of shape at 200.
Out of shape Anderson is closer to 225. Fedor stays a constant 230-240ish. He obviously has a size advantage, but it will be less of a mismatch than things like Yoshida vs. Rumble, who are technically the same weight class. And I cannot stress the word “technically” enough…
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 3:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn’t Alves 195 in GSP fight?
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's where he starts his cut from
after training off the downtime fat early in the camp. Probably gets dehydrates from about 185ish, if not lower.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 3:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I remember him saying on the press conference that he’ll be something over 190 during fight time. But who know how much these people really weight. Tibau said that he was 185 lbs when fighting Neer O_O. Crazy stuff is going on.
by dancingChicken on Jan 22, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That sounds about right.
They have specific diets starting weeks out to keep their body from retaining certain nutrients that make tissue denser. I know Diego Sanchez was down to about 165 just over a week before the BJ fight, but likely walked into the cage closer to 175-180ish after he rehydrated and got a good meal or two (with carbs) in him. He was over 185 less than a week after the fight. It’s insane the amount of weight some guys can cut.
To bring back the original point though, if he didn’t need a weight cutting diet and just ate healthy through a camp, he’s probably closer to 215 or so.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 4:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait, so Fedor, the undisputed #1 HW probably ever could beat a middleweight?
Why is this relevant? Fedor would probably also beat GSP, and Jose Aldo as well.
The fact that Anderson could even be competitive as a heavyweight shows his greatness. The dude fights at MW for heaven’s sake!
For the record, yes, Fedor would be favored, and no this isn’t very relevant.
by jhf884 on Jan 22, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In the stand-up, but Fedor would do some good damage on the ground
"Everyone has a game plan, untell they get hit." -Mike Tyson
by mma is #1 on Jan 21, 2010 9:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So much unholy love for Anderson on this site. I guess when I think of Anderson I tend to remember his getting owned by Lutter in the first round (not in a fluky way mind you — Lutter took Silva down, passed his guard, mounted him and opened up a can of whoop ass and then promptly closed that can by attempting a sloppy arm bar) and his fights against Cote and Leites. I also tend to recall that he has not fought a single determined and skilled MMA wrestler since coming to the UFC. (Hendo is a brawler and although savvy is hardly an intelligent fighter or someone who looks first to take the fight to the ground. He gave up a body lock to throw a knee in the second round against Silva.) I also recall that he’s fought a tremendous number of cans in the weakest division in the UFC (although of course he’s fought some solid opponents as well NM, RF 2x and Hendo). He definitely looked awesome in clowning Forrest but Forrest, aside from his improbable title run, looks so much like a journeyman to me.
As you can tell I don’t agree that Silva should be deemed the GOAT. If Silva can convincingly beat Belfort, it will go a long way to convincing hold outs like me that he’s the GOAT.
by The Darkness on Jan 21, 2010 11:12 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
LOL@ a can of whoop ass...
i don’t recall it being anywhere near that serious, although he landed a few shots from his mount…
I'm like PacMan fightin you silly kids... throw ya Hatton the ring, and get knocked outlike Ricky did.
lol.
by Loot on Jan 22, 2010 5:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Every fighter has weaknesses.
Even the vaunted Fedor was getting pretty well worked over by Andrei Arlovski before AA lost his mind.
That Anderson had trouble with Lutter is concerning, but it’s not like it shows some massive, gaping hole in his overall game. Everyone knows Silva is most dangerous on his feet and in the clinch, so understanding that he’s weaker on the ground doesn’t really change how devastating he is as a fighter. It just confirms that he’s most dangerous on his feet.
At least, that’s how I see it.
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
by misterjonez on Jan 22, 2010 5:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He’s definitely most dangerous on his feet. What bothers me is that he has a clear hole in his game and it hasn’t been tested by anyone since he’s come to the UFC. Not his fault of course but I don’t see how you can’t have a lingering doubt that a determined wrestler wouldn’t have his way with Silva especially when someone like Travis Lutter was successful on 3 of 4 takedown attempts.
by The Darkness on Jan 22, 2010 1:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He's so weak on the mat and nobody even tries to do anything about it!
If only Thales Leites tried to get Anderson to the ground! And Nate totally should have tried to take him down. Not like he would have been stuffed until Anderson hit a switch and swiftly TKO’d the fuck out of him or anything. And Henderson could have worked him on the mat! No way that Anderson could take his back and choke him out.
Can we as a community move past the idea that Anderson is bad on the ground? Please?
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
by pdl on Jan 22, 2010 2:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think anyone is saying Andy is 'bad' on the ground.
What we’re saying is that of all the weapons in his arsenal, his greatest weakness is on the ground. I don’t think anyone will dispute that.
And against best-in-the-world competition, a weakness that someone like Travis Lutter can expose is a serious concern, and warrants further discussion.
Personally, I think he’s a dangerous fighter off his back, but he can be controlled there by a reasonably good wrestler. The problem, as you say, is getting Andy on his back in the first place.
It’s not exactly the same, but this is almost a repeat of the Chuck Liddell situation. The guy simply never got taken down, and the few times it did happen, he popped right back up to his feet, where he was most dangerous. Andy is probably similar, but he did get worked over by Travis Lutter. You can’t just throw it out the window, but the further away from that fight we go, the less importance it has. I’ll give you that.
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
by misterjonez on Jan 22, 2010 6:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Leites is a terrible wrestler and he was able to take Anderson down twice. FG did not attempt to take Silva down at all. Hendo was 1 for 1. He had a body lock on Silva in the second round but released it to go for a knee. Marquardt was 1 for 2 on takedowns with the second takedown being stuffed primarily because NM was hurt when he shot in.
What’s amazing about Silva is his striking and in particular his precision (which is where his power comes from) and timing (which is why he’s such a good counterpuncher). If I had just watched one fight of his, I woudln’t think he was that good of a striker. He just doesn’t have a “wow” factor. But when you look at his finishes over a period of time, you can’t help but be impressed.
Now that I’ve given Silva a compliment, I’ll repeat myself and say that he still has a big hole in his game. A determined wrestler will stand a very good chance of beating him.
by The Darkness on Jan 23, 2010 3:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














