Quote of the Day 2: Alistair Overeem Not Defending His Strikeforce Title Is "Ridiculous and Cheapens the Belt"
The thing with Alistair is that he is an awesome fighter and an incredible physical specimen. I don't think anyone denies how talented a fighter he is but what frustrates is him not fighting top ranked competition in MMA. How can you not defend the Strikeforce title for two years? It's ridiculous and cheapens the title, which is a shame when that division includes such names as Fedor and Werdum and Bigfoot and Brett Rogers. I could speculate as to why Alistair hasn't fought in the USA for two years but I prefer not to. All I know is that Alistair versus Fedor would be insane and needs to happen. As for 2010 with Alistair, I think we'll definitely see him fight in Japan. I just hope the competition stiffens up a bit. His last two MMA fights were against James Thompson and Fujita, who are hardly top competition. It's frustrating seeing how much talent and size and aggression Alistair has and not seeing all those attributes get tested in his MMA career.
K-1 announcer Michael Schiavello talking to Michael David Smith.
75 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How can you cheapen something that currently has no value?
Pee-pee money is not an employment history.
by finkrod on Jan 18, 2010 4:28 PM EST reply actions 13 recs
When he won it, it had zero value. The division has grown up around him as has the promotion, so value is being derived from that, but remember who he beat to with the title. Paul Buentello and only Paul Buentello. It was his first and only fight in SF. His title means very little if anything at all.
Some people think I am a dumb, ugly human being, but really I am a beautiful ape, with exceptional verbal skills.
by szucconi on Jan 18, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
after going to heavyweight
who has he fought?? seriously and he lost to top 205 guys.
by mr. gogoplata on Jan 18, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions
Until Dream stops paying him truckloads of money to fight subpar competition I don’t think anything will change.
by John Nash on Jan 18, 2010 4:32 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I’d also love to be paid six figs to standing guillotine a middle aged fat guy.
Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"
by Blackout612 on Jan 18, 2010 4:54 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
That is true
but when he loses in k-1 he’s alway quick to bring up how he is really an mma fighter and that he would kill them under mma rules. At this point he is either a good but not great k-1 fighter or a supposedly “great” mma fighter who is fighting in squash matches.
You might be right about K-1. He’s just below the top guys. But I’m getting tired of him and GG always bringing up how he is really a better mma fighter. Please prove it. Don’t make Coker beg Overeem.
I'm not super up to date on kick boxing but..
I would expect he’s top 10ish in the world. right? Getting into the semi’s of the world GP and having a win over Badr has got to get you close to the top 10…
I don’t think many people would argue – he’s definitely top 10 and I think he’s also top 10 in mma but unfortunately all I can do is speculate at this point , he hasn’t proven himself yet. fighting an OLD Fujita and Thompson really means squat. His toughest opponent was Cro Cop whom he indeed beat handidly but got a no contest.
He was beating
Cro cop silly before mirko found a way out of their fight. I’d say he is top 10ish simply because his striking is off the charts.
Probably the best in MMA.
" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico loose a ball in the Sun? "
by aaronb on Jan 18, 2010 6:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
There are more than 9 heavyweights you’d favor over Overeem? It’s not as if he’s never fought real competition in MMA, he did very well at 205, even when losing. He did well against Shogun each time, Liddell, Little Nog and obviously in his wins as well. His problem was always his cardio and heart as well as his average chin.
I understand he’s fighting cans now, but you can’t ignore the fact he is beating everyone in K-1 except the very elite. Ewerton Teixeira is a top 10 fighter in kickboxing and he outclassed him. Overeem is a very good grappler with good wrestling and takedown defense, just because he’s fighting cans now in MMA and the absolute best in K-1 it doesn’t mean you can’t gauge him as an MMA fighter but only as a kickboxer.
Bloody Elbow’s aggregate rankings are usually pretty sketchy. But if you can name 10 heavyweight mma fighters you’d favor over Overeem now, I’d love to see them.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 6:21 PM EST up reply actions
Since 11/16/07
Megareems wins and opponents record over last 5 fights:
Fujita 1-4
Thompson 0-5
Tony Sylvester 3-2 (only a 5 fight career)
Goodridge 0-5
Mark Hunt 0-5
Hyun Lee 1-2
Buentello 3-2 one of those wins are against Goodridge
That is why I don’t have him top 10. He has fought absolutely no one. I would LOVE to see him fight Fedor or even try to avenge his loss to Werdum.
Fedor, Brock, Nog, Mir, JDS, Cain, Carwin, Rogers, Werdum, Barnett, AA and Gonzaga all are above him.
by Riney on Jan 18, 2010 8:28 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Trying to be as objective as possible, he beats or at least should be favored over, of those listed:
Carwin
Rogers
AA
Gonzaga
Mir
And probably Barnett and maybe even Nog at this point. Nog did a very good job outboxing a 46 year old Couture, but it was a 46 year old Couture.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 8:42 PM EST up reply actions
Mir
breaks something early, and I loath Mr Mir.
Mir breaks what? He’s not going to get taken down by Mir and he’s better than Mir standing.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
Top 10 in actual competition he’s beaten? No.
Top 10 talent? Considering the lack of depth in HW, sure.
If Derek Jeter clubbed a baby seal on earth day while wearing a mink coat and crocodile skin boots while burning tires on an iceberg, the reaction would be "Its OK Derek, you’re a Yankee." -First mammal to wear pants
Top 10 as a fighter. Bloody Elbow’s method of using competition faced has its limits. It’s not just talent, as a fighter (mma or K-1) Alistair is solidly in the top 10.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 6:44 PM EST up reply actions
You get ranked based mostly on your fight record, and not your potential.
(for most competent sites at least)
and Overeem has beaten, Paul Buentello, Tae Hyun Lee, Mark Hunt, Gary Goodridge, Tony Sylvester, James Thompson, and Kazuyuki Fujita… Can you honestly tell me that beating those guys get you in the top 10? I mean Seriously?
Winning in K-1 shouldn’t make him rise in the rankings, because it’s a completely different sport… You don’t see vinny magalhaes rising cause of his impressive ADCC wins right?
That isn’t a fault of the SBN rankings. Just because you don’t agree with “the consensus” doesn’t mean everyone is wrong.
by Anton Tabuena on Jan 18, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
Kickboxing, just like boxing or wrestling or BJJ, is a facet of MMA.
And when an mma fighter decides to train or compete in an individual martial art and shows obvious signs of development, I don’t understand why that development should be ignored just because he didn’t also grapple while using it.
He hasn’t forgotten how to use kimuras or guillotines or how to defend a takedown. If anything, the latter will probably be even easier now.
He was a legit, hell at times a great fighter at 205 but he had had some serious cardio and pacing issues, as well as striking defense. Now when considering those issues and comparing him to how he has looked against Peter Aerts or Mirko Cro Cop or Remy Bonjasky, his cardio, pacing and striking defense all have improved dramatically.
His striking defense probably has part to do with the larger gloves in K-1 and as such should be taken at a discount but I don’t understand why such a marked improvement in a fighter should be ignored just because he’s been fed cans by his management and promotors in MMA.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 9:43 PM EST up reply actions
again, this is simple, by talent, no doubt he'd be top 10,
but on MMA accomplishments (which is what people base rankings mostly on), no he isn’t top 10…
by Anton Tabuena on Jan 18, 2010 10:36 PM EST up reply actions
Accomplishments in mixed martial arts should include accomplishments in various martial arts.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions
1) We don’t rank anyone.
2) Rankings should be a snapshot in time based on your accomplishments to date with the most recent results weighted heavily.
I agree that Overeem’s a top 10 guy at HW in terms of his ability, but on merit, he’s probably a fringe top 10 if at all.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
We've got him as #4
Quite a feat.
Head Kick Legend
Twitter @HeadKickLegend
and rightfully so..
He has impressive wins there so he should be ranked high… in K-1..
until he beats guys in MMA, it isn’t right that some people rank him in the top 10.
by Anton Tabuena on Jan 18, 2010 8:56 PM EST up reply actions
Even if when he does win as impressively as he does in K-1 he is able to assuage some doubts or criticism of his abilities in MMA? Such as cardio, his chin or striking defense?
Mixed martial arts is just that, mixed martial arts. If a fighter is able to rapidly develop his skills in an aspect of MMA I don’t understand why that shouldn’t be given some consideration.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
If/when that victory is over a worthy opponent,
but you don’t get respect for kicking tomato cans in an alley somewhere…especially all juiced up.
Mixed martial arts is just that, mixed martial arts. If a fighter is able to rapidly develop his skills in an aspect of MMA I don’t understand why that shouldn’t be given some consideration.
You are arguing that if a fighter performs well in “an aspect of MMA” it should positively affect their ranking. Are you willing to own up to the implications of your argument and say that if a fighter performs poorly (shows bad cardio, bad chin, etc.) in “an aspect of MMA” it should negatively affect their ranking?
If they are directly relevant to practical MMA, I believe so, yes. So wrestling, boxing, muay thai or no-gi grappling.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 11:08 PM EST up reply actions
so winning Grappling tournaments
should affect your MMA ranking? That makes no sense at all… The whole point of MMA is having to deal with so many different disciplines and still be able to win… Winning a k1 match doesn’t, and shouldn’t affect anything but his rank in k1.
I'm like PacMan fightin you silly kids... throw ya Hatton the ring, and get knocked outlike Ricky did.
lol.
Right now, Alvarez is the #3 BE consensus fighter with 88% and Florian is the #4 BE consensus fighter with 86%. Pretty close. If Eddie fought his next fight in K1 and got completely owned by a mediocre kickboxer (think Kid vs. that Korean fighter), you’d argue that Kenny should more ahead of him in the rankings?
If he loss to a fighter that Sam Stout demolished a year prior, and Eddie gets outclassed by a fighter who shows holes in his defense or loopy hooks…then yes.
And yes, winning grappling tournaments should affect your mma rankings. i.e. Josh Barnett and Jacare. It’s in disciplines directly relevant to practical MMA.
If it were taekwando competitions or hell, even catch wrestling. Not so much. But K-1 and No-gi grappling are directly relevant to MMA because they are absolutely aspects of practical MMA.
by Super Dingus on Jan 19, 2010 12:10 AM EST up reply actions
My apologies.
I’m at work right now, should have re-worded that first part.
If the fighter Eddie loses to is a fighter that very recently lost against Sam Stout, then yes. His mma rankings should be effected if his ability or kickboxing can be objectively gauged. Which in Overeem’s case, it can be.
by Super Dingus on Jan 19, 2010 12:12 AM EST up reply actions
No, because he hasn’t made any strides in improving his takedown or submission defense while competing in K-1.
by Super Dingus on Jan 19, 2010 12:42 AM EST up reply actions
But it’s not even just that. It’s difficult to blame an MMA fighter for losing in a kickboxing or grappling competition. It’s because of the expected level of proficiency the fighter would need in that specialized area, since they don’t have to worry about takedowns if it’s K-1. Or getting knocked out if it’s BJJ.
But if an MMA fighter is able to take one aspect of his game, and let it be said Overeem is a proficient grappler as well, and be able to not just compete but be one of the top 5 fighters in the world in said sport…I don’t understand why that should be ignored. To say that he wouldn’t be in the top 10 in MMA rankings seems silly to me.
I just don’t get it.
by Super Dingus on Jan 19, 2010 12:39 AM EST up reply actions
exactly
If people deny Overeem has great talent they are just dumb but at the same time the people that make the argument that Overeem is a top 10 hw for beating Thompson and and Fujita and Sylvester and Goodrige are just insane.
If/When Overeem begins to beat top guys I have no problem moving him up but come on Kimbo beat Thompson is Kimbo top 10?No. Top 25? No. Top 50? No.
I think Overeem should be top 20 just because of the lack of depth in the hw division but top 10 at this point, absoluetely not.
by bigdmmafan on Jan 18, 2010 4:34 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
True
It would be hard to make a case that he deserves to be ranked in the top 10 based on what he’s done, but based on pure talent, he’s anywhere from No. 1 to No. 5.
Rankings based on talent are meaningless. They are a reflection of pure opinion.
Some people think I am a dumb, ugly human being, but really I am a beautiful ape, with exceptional verbal skills.
by szucconi on Jan 18, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
LULZ
Blackout612- "Wuts teh UFC?"
Ubernoober- "It like two guy who just stand and swing for fence and try to knock each other shit out it awesome"
by Blackout612 on Jan 18, 2010 10:43 PM EST up reply actions

http://mixedmartialartsblogger.wordpress.com/
by Cory Braiterman on Jan 18, 2010 11:05 PM EST up reply actions
It’s really ridiculous that Alistair Overeem is holding the HW belt of a promotion that currently has FEDOR.
by Monday Morning Martial Artist on Jan 18, 2010 4:34 PM EST reply actions
“It’s frustrating seeing how much talent and size and aggression Alistair has and not seeing all those attributes get tested in his MMA career.” I’m pretty sure it’s the “getting tested” part he’s worried about.
Pee-pee money is not an employment history.
by finkrod on Jan 18, 2010 4:37 PM EST reply actions 6 recs
Make Alistair fight Fedor on the CBS broadcast in April or strip him of the title. They also need to fast track Barnett’s appeal so there is a plan B after Werdum.
….and then they need a plan C incase Barnett pisses hot again.
Sorry, he Jason Bourned me.
by MMAussie on Jan 18, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
if he doesn’t defend his title by midyear I say strip him, he is obviously not interested in either of the following:
*fighting in the US
*getting beat by Fedor (I don’t really blame him though)
Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever
He's got to fight
Otherwise he’d never knowing how badly Fedor would have killed him? Something like that would haunt you.
I think the memories of getting beat by Fedor would haunt him even more!
Pain is Temporary
Pride is Forever
It's ok
They have a support group for Fedor victims nowdays.
Rogers just got his one month chip.
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Jan 19, 2010 8:18 AM EST up reply actions
Several good points so far. The two main points are (i) Strikeforce never had a legit heavyweight division until the last six months or so and (ii) the pay on a Strikeforce contract he signed 2+ years is likely terrible compared to the pay he’s getting in K-1 and Japan.
For all the complaining MMA fans do about fighter pay, isn’t it a bit hypocritical to bad mouth the guy for cashing in? He hasn’t said he won’t fight in the US, just that he has other obligations… obligations which Strikeforce opened the door for when they decided to sign a non-exclusive contract, which is only one of many.
If I was a betting man (and I’m not), I would wager we’ll see Ubereem-Fedor in Dream, and everyone will talk about how Alistair is avoiding the piss test by fighting in Japan. If Fedor wins, Overeem is overrated. If Fedor loses, it’s the “horse meat” that isn’t tested for over in the land of the rising sun.
Hell, even if the fight happens in the US, the claim will be that he just waited to cycle off properly, which is something Barnett apparently never learned to do (no bashing, just stating what seems to be acknowledged fact).
So, what are the incentives for Overeem to fight Fedor in the US for the Strikeforce title, except to satisfy fickle American MMA fans for likely little compensation (relative to Japanese MMA and K-1) who will accuse him of juicing win, lose, or draw?
by mma_critic on Jan 18, 2010 5:10 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
He didn’t sign his SF contract 2+ years ago.
by ufc4 on Jan 18, 2010 5:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Little incentive or not
he has a contract with this promotion and he’s currently basically just sitting on their championship belt, if he feels like there’s no point to fighting in StrikeForce then he should drop the belt like Cung Lee since it’s pretty much been proven at this point that StrikeForce wont really take action since they’re a bunch of push overs when it comes to their bigger name talents.
And it’s one thing when fighters are going out there competing against other top guys and giving their all while getting paid well below their talents, but when a guy is pretty much wasting everybody’s time and his own career by intentionally dodging his obligations and potential quality match-ups to play smash the can overseas it’s another thing entirely, especially since there’s already on going rumors as to why this person refuses to fight in the states in the first place.
"Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything Kent. 14% of people know that. "
The juicing accusations are cause the dude went from LHW to nearly maxing out at 260 in the course of two years. It’s not american fans who suspect steroid use, its anyone who has paid any attention to the guy.
If my life depending on picking one fighter in all combat sports who had used steroids in the past two years and hadn’t gotten caught, it would be AO. I mean, it’s just sitting there, all ripply muscled and obvious. Tremendous, seemingly impossible muscle gain over a very limited time—- check. Disinterest in fighting in jurisdictions with testing—- check. Fighting in organizations with a reputation for rampant steroid use—- check. He (most likely) used steroids. I’m not upset about it—- but he still probably did it.
"an excellent example of why most MMA "journalism" is a joke. Pseudonyms like "toxic" and shitty writing like that dopey article"--- Joe Rogan.
by toxic on Jan 18, 2010 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
great points
He doesn’t get the pay nor the star power in the US, the only reason for him to fight there is to seek real competition (I’m speaking mma of course). On another note if DREAM has the HW tourney it and Bring in Orloski (sp) and a few Strikeforce fighters, throw in Mosasi and hell Minowaman lol and you will see his skills tested more before getting thrown into the deep end.
Deep end = Fedor
HI YAH!
by Thats It For you! on Jan 18, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions
When did he sign it? I used the 2+ years ago figure because of the standard comments and the fact that the Buentello fight was in late 2007 (November 16, 2007, according to Sherdog Fight Finder). After doing some research, my guess is that he signed earlier when he fought Belfort.
As for juicing, my guess is that he – like a lot of other fighters – is on it, but my keyboard hunch doesn’t mean sh*t. As many have said, it’s ignorance that leads to positive tests, like Royce’s crazy levels when he was popped.
And everyone should keep in mind that the Strikeforce HW division basically sucked until very recently, so there hasn’t been a rush for Overeem to defend that belt. And while his MMA fights have been against sub-par opponents, his K-1 fights have been against the best.
In all honesty, I’m not an Overeem fan and have only seen a handful of his fights, mostly in K-1. But the hate and accusations are beyond ridiculous.
by mma_critic on Jan 18, 2010 5:48 PM EST reply actions
The thing is
if Strikeforce wanted to offer him a new contract they could. I know the UFC update contracts all the time, as Dana has mention on a few Interviews in the past that they renegotiate mid contract with fighters.
So why doesn’t Coker say “Yo Ali, ya frikin Dutch bastard, come fight for me and give this belt some legitimacy it’s been two years and we’re starting to look silly now.”
I wish a Strikeforce contract got leaked like Randy’s UFC one did. It would be hilarious to see all the loopholes in it, because seemingly there is plenty.
"of a world thats doing its best, night and day,
to make me everybody else"
This is also a prime example why open contracts will never work in MMA.
Imagine if GSP was on an open contract in the UFC and he said I’ll keep the belt while I go wrestle in the Olympics. Never in a zillion yearswould that happen but Overeem can particpate in K-1 all he likes while being “champion”
"of a world thats doing its best, night and day,
to make me everybody else"
by Lay 'n' Pray on Jan 18, 2010 7:22 PM EST up reply actions
Unless there’s some weird clause in SF contracts that I’m not aware of, there’s nothing stopping them from stripping him or creating an interim title. People can get on Alistair’s case all they want, but Strikeforce could just as easily strip him of the belt tomorrow. For whatever reason, they haven’t.
Your GSP analogy is horrible as the UFC would instantly strip GSP or create an interim title. There’s a ton of precedence with this.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
My analogy might have been horrible
but thats what I’m trying to get at. No way would UFC let one of their Champions still hold the belt if they had no intentions of defending it due to other obligations, where as SF are.
"of a world thats doing its best, night and day,
to make me everybody else"
by Lay 'n' Pray on Jan 19, 2010 8:31 AM EST up reply actions
Not a leak
Randy held a press conference on HDnet and passed out copies of his contract to the press in attendance.
" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico loose a ball in the Sun? "
by aaronb on Jan 18, 2010 7:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
ah right, cool.
I’m still a newb.
"of a world thats doing its best, night and day,
to make me everybody else"
he didn’t even wow/impress in his chosen background of K-1. Alistair’s not exactly the mma king. a few years back Chuck beat that *ss down and battered him. Seriously.
Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei. Basillio. Harry Greb.
by theworldsoldestsport on Jan 18, 2010 11:35 PM EST reply actions
Alistair is the #4 ranked K-1 heavyweight in the world. Arguably could be #3 since his first fight with Remy Bonjasky could have gone towards AO if they had counted the knockdown against Remy.
And as far as the Chuck fight…yes, Chuck beat that butt down and battered him.
In all fairness, Alistair was one of the better fighters in Pride for the first 3 minutes. He’s not a perfect fighter by any means, but he seems to have made strides in improving his defense, cardio and pacing. Which were largely responsible for his loss to Chuck.
by Super Dingus on Jan 18, 2010 11:49 PM EST up reply actions
Alistair was one of the better fighters in Pride for the first 3 minutes
Phil Baroni is also a badass for the first 3 minutes in the UFC.
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Jan 19, 2010 8:38 AM EST up reply actions

by 













