MMA Sabermetrics: Isolated Striking Power (ISOS)
Sabermetrics is defined as the analysis of baseball through objective evidence, normally based on statistics to support an argument. Through Sabermetrics, baseball has a plethora of statistical information that can be valuable to fans, general managers, coaches, and agents, and there are numerous studies that tout Sabermetrics in baseball as being a productive field of study to scout talent, project player performance, and give managers, owners, and coaches an idea of how their current crop of players are performing.
Through the unique opportunity to analyze the data within the FightMetric project, I’ll be posting a lengthy series of articles exploring current Sabermetrics statistics in baseball as they apply to mixed martial arts. Can some of these statistics be ported to our sport? Do they have meaning? While the purpose of my fellowship is to give some meaning to the information in an unique manner, I feel that these base statistics will open up a world of thinking among our community and myself as to how we can further this very new field in our sport.
The first stat that I wanted to explore was the Isolated Power (ISO) statistic. In baseball, ISO is the measure of a batter’s raw power through extra bases per at-bat:
Isolated Power (ISO) = (Total Bases – Hits) / Total At-Bats
Total Bases (TB) = (Total Hits – Doubles – Triples – HR) + (Doubles * 2) + (Triples * 3) + (HR * 4)
MMA doesn't have a way in which to classify each strike in correlation to a number of bases. We do, however, have a distinction between regular strikes and power strikes. As with every process that will come out of the fellowship, there are some concerns as to how meaningful the statistic actually is in our sport versus baseball.
For our formula, we'll focus solely on striking. Isolated Striking Power (ISOS) should give us a measure of the ability of a fighter to land for power in correlation with the amount of strikes he attempts.
Isolated Striking Power (ISOS) = (Total Standing Strikes Landed Overall – Total Standing Regular Strikes) / Total Standing Attempts
This essentially gives us the Total Power Strikes Landed Overall / Total Standing Strikes Attempted, which gives us an accuracy statistic. The main difference is that we aren't determining how accurate the fighter is with power strikes because we aren't dividing by his Total Power Strikes Attempted. Instead, we're determining the accuracy of power strikes in correlation to all attempted attacks on the feet.
The statistics shown below have a limitation of 150 attempts or more, a total fight time of 20 minutes in the Octagon, and includes ONLY distance striking. The clinch and ground strikes are not included. We will discuss this further after the jump...:
ISOSUpdated |
Figure 1: Top 40 Fighters in ISOS stats for UFC bouts only. Limited to 150 attempts or greater, total Octagon time of 20 minutes or greater. Data used was current up to 12/29/2009, does not include most recent events.
The top dog probably isn't a surprise to anyone as Anderson Silva has wrecked numerous opponents with powerful punches. His score is two times that of fighters such as Georges St. Pierre (.2131) and B.J. Penn (.2026), but that's pretty accurate. St. Pierre has crushed a lot of opponents in recent memory with his ground strikes while Penn is more of a methodical jabber on the feet than a blaster of overhands.
Clinch and ground strikes were not included because those strikes are much more accurate than distance strikes. Including those strikes in a combined statistic would skew the stat. For example, Georges St. Pierre might have a very high number if we compiled a statistic using only ground strikes. If we combined the ground stat with the striking stat on the feet, St. Pierre's overall would be skewed higher due to his high ground stat in comparison to his standing stat.
The best example of this was Ben Saunders. His Isolated Power in the clinch vaulted him into the top 3 on most of my models, and this was primarily due to the drubbing he gave Brandon Wolff. If we limit the dataset to over 150 attempts and distance strikes only, Saunders has some work to do in order to make the list. It also stops him from skewing his way into the top 3 when he really only displayed huge power and accuracy in the clinch.
Overall Thoughts
What can this statistic provide fans? That's really what we're trying to determine here when compiling these numbers. If I take a look at this stat, what would I know about the fighter in a split second? With ISO stats, the higher ISOS number generally means that the fighter has landed more power strikes over his total attempts than the lower ranked fighters.
Realistically, I'd know that fighters at the top of this list generally have a higher chance of ending someone's night in a brutal flurry over fighters at the bottom. It isn't always the case as there are powerful guys who can unleash explosive punches that simply don't throw those blows frequently, but the fighters at the top are throwing powerful strikes frequently with success. And that should spell a higher chance of damage, knockouts, and finishes.
On paper however, this statistic should simply give fans an idea of how effective a fighter is in landing power strikes in the striking portion of his fights. The higher the number, the more effective the fighter has been in throwing power and landing.
All data provided by FightMetric.com for compiling of these statistics.
92 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The only problem with this is that you are trying to get an objective analysis through subjective data. What constitutes a power-strike? I would imagine you could get differing opinions. Is a leg kick a power strike? What about a check hook?
Obviously, this is a given. And we have had discussions about such problems. It is always going to be a problem when it comes to trying to come up with statistics in this sport, and it will affect the meaningfulness. Many statistics likely will have this sort of asteriks next to it.
The dataset is subjective because FightMetric is determing what is a power strike and what isn’t. You are right.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
I even think it’s difficult to quantify strikes landed. What constitutes “blocked”?
by WestbergIDFC on Jan 13, 2010 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
Actually, FightMetric studies each fight using slo-mo technology, etc… so their determination of blocks and actual lands is very accurate. I wouldn’t think that’d be a problem.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 10:17 AM EST up reply actions
Over time, that problem should go away.
Sure, one person’s perception of a fight might be a bit strange, but with several instances of perception (multiple fights) with multiple observers we should average out a lot of the noise in the data.
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
There’s nothing subjective about the definition of a power strike for punching at the very least. It’s any punch that’s not a jab. They aren’t making any real judgements about power, just about what type of punch was thrown. I’m sure they created a similar definition for kicks. Say, leg kicks are “jab-like” and everything else is a power strike.
The point is that each time they run through a fight, they aren’t going through and judging each strike on how powerful it was. They are just determining the type of strike, which is not particular subjective. It’s either a hook or it isn’t. It’s a front kick or it isn’t. Then it falls into their predetermined categories for “power” or “not power”.
by ricker2005 on Jan 13, 2010 10:17 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Dataset bias will certainly be a concern.
In baseball there are two primary stat providers: Baseball Info Solutions (BIS) and STATS. A great example of this is a fielding statistic called UZR developed by Mitchel Lichtman. Comparisons of the metric run on the two datasets show a strong correlation but it certainly isn’t 1:1 and the discrepancies are tied to the classifications of batted balls (primarily).
This is going to be somewhat mitigated by the fact that you’re setting up a sample size floor so bias from individual fights shouldn’t be as prevalent.
Think; It's not illegal yet.
Where does Wanderlei rank?
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Jan 13, 2010 10:12 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Wanderlei is very low, but this is only for his stints in the UFC. He’s at a 0.1599, which is nearly at the bottom. But this has me wanting to look at what it would be with PRIDE fights included, which I’m going to compile just to see where he is.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 10:18 AM EST up reply actions
I can’t give out specifics to everyone as the data is protected, but Wanderlei moves up into the middle of the pack if his PRIDE fights are included. Over a .22
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
It probably doesn’t do him justice either because when he would swarm, he’d throw sometimes dozens of strikes in a row, and while not accurate, he only needed to connect with one or two of them to finish someone off.
This is why our discussion below about a coefficient on knockouts might actually give us an idea of who has that knockout power.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
Without meaning to give a big list of names, I though Paul Daley would be in the list somewhere. Has he attempted less than 150 power strikes perhaps?
Oh yes both his UFC fights ended in the first round, I apologise.
by StevenGiles on Jan 13, 2010 10:21 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, he probably hasn’t scratched 150 attempts yet. But once he does, he’ll likely be in the top 20.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
Also...
I have a few ideas that I want to explore, but I’d definitely like input on any other types of stats or trends anybody would be interested in seeing.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Please don't take this as derisive
but I’m not sure what the point of this statistic is yet. I can conglomerate a set of numbers that conforms to what I think a “leaders” list should look like but that doesn’t prove anything about the validity of the statistic.
If this is supposed to be a purely descriptive statisitc (i.e. who throws the most power punches) then that’s fine. Personally, I’d be more interested in how the data correlates from fight to fight. Does Anderson Silva have a higher ISOS in fights that end quickly? In fights that end by TKO? Does ISOS offer any predictions as to what round the match would end?
Think; It's not illegal yet.
This is purely a topical statistic at this point. The latter options that you’ve laid out are actually areas in which I’ve been working, and those points are actually areas in which I want to expand into other stats. Does this stat give us some sort of predictor for an outcome, etc?
This stat doesn’t actually show who throws the most power punches though.
It shows who throws accurately for power in correlation to their attempts. If you land a lot of power blows but throw an insane amount of punches, you won’t rank high on this list at all.
If you land a lot of power strikes within a relatively high percentage in comparison to your total attempts, you’ll rank high on this list. Anderson Silva’s number is fairly impressive if you think about it.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
Thinking about this… it’s almost pointless to try to break down Anderson Silva’s ISOS in fights than end quickly because I’m assuming all those shots he obliterated people with in those short fights are tabulated as power strikes. That would obviously put his ISOS at a high level.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
this isn't what Leland is talking about, but since you mentioned it,
the guy who throws the most Power Punches is actually, Brandon Vera..
-from the Vera vs Couture Stats post:
Highest Power Strike-to-Jab ratio in UFC history– 72%, min 300 strikes landedHe throws power shots more frequently, (or throws the least jabs), depending on how you look at it, than anyone who has ever competed in the UFC by throwing them 72% of the time.
by Anton Tabuena on Jan 13, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
He's also Tied with Anderson Silva for highest Body/Leg Strike-to-Head Strike ratio in UFC history
Joe Rogan always goes gaga for body shots and leg kicks, saying that people don’t throw them enough, and true enough, the average fighter throws leg and body shot on just 18% of their strikes. Brandon Vera on the other hand, throws leg and body shots 35% of the time. He has also mixed up his targets as he is tied for the highest Body/Leg-to-Head strike ratio in UFC history.
by Anton Tabuena on Jan 13, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
He should thank to Mike Patt for those stats, haha
by dancingChicken on Jan 13, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
yes, he landed lots of leg kicks to Patt.
but the stat also counts body shots, and in general, Vera really does throw a lot to the body too, and not just with kicks. He threw lots of body punches too. (his boxing looks a bit awkward though).. Compare that to the other fighters who almost exclusively aims for the head, and it gets kinda interesting to see cause the average guy throws to the body/leg only 18% of the time.
now someone who reminds me of a guy who changed styles, is Shogun, on his fight against Machida.. He hardly went to the head on that bout.. Usually he does try to counter with punches to the head instead of mostly leg kicks. I’d like to see his average leg/body shots in his career, compared to the lyoto bout.
by Anton Tabuena on Jan 13, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
Exactly, and Vera ranks high on this list because of those high amount of power punches, he happens to land a lot of them, more than most fighters.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 12:51 PM EST up reply actions
this means that he’s the 6th most accurate with power shots right? so he throws the most power shots, but also is one of the most accurate with them?
by Anton Tabuena on Jan 13, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, he would be the 6th most accurate with power shots in correlation with ALL STRIKES attempted in the striking department. That’s the beauty of the stat. It isn’t based on accuracy of just power, but over ALL strikes. So he’s one of the best in the UFC at landing power strikes, but he also happens to land a higher percentage than most fighters in the UFC over all of his attempts, which includes regular jabs and kicks.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t know if the data needed can be readily extracted from the set you’re working with, but I’d be interested in seeing an attempt to quantify the trade-off between going for a leg lock versus giving up position and absorbing strikes.
Actually, this is intriguing. I might try to look into that.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions
My only problem with this, which is unfortunate because I’m interested, is that we have no way of determining all the strikes AFTER an opponent lost the lock and gave up position. We don’t have any way to determine the stop and start of the “absorbing strikes” phase of that fight.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:25 AM EST up reply actions
I didn’t think of that. Even if it wouldn’t be too informative, I’d be interested in something simple like the correlation between leg lock attempts in a round and the probability of that fighter winning the round. I suspect that in the UFC there would be a small negative correlation between the two. I’d predict the opposite for Japan, but needed the round-by-round scoring data doesn’t exist.
I’d also be interested in seeing a statistic comparing submissions get up by grappling (Aoki-Hansen III) versus submissions set up by strikes (Florian-Guida). It would be interesting to break it down both for fighters and for types of submissions. However, as with the leg locks, defining the the time period to look at is problematic.
Interesting concept, but how did Uno manage the Top 10 over someone like Quarry?
Without pain, without sacrifice, we would have nothing.
by lowellthehammer on Jan 13, 2010 10:35 AM EST reply actions
I’m going to assume it has to do with his style in his early UFC stint than his more recent fights.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
So are we calling this Moneyfights?
I think it’ll be interesting to see how this pans out. It works great for baseball, which is easy enough to analyze (slow games make data-gathering easy, lots of games for a large sample size, very discernible objective measurements, etc). How will that transfer to a sport with so little data from which to work?
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Jan 13, 2010 10:37 AM EST reply actions
It’s not going to be easy, and I’m trying to work through some basic statistics before I begin hedging a path through some of the more complicated formulas to determine things like defensive ratings and offensive ratings.
This stat is really one of the more basic statistics that’s easy to calculate and determine, but it is also serving as one of the first posts here to get the ball rolling on discussion and ideas.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 10:40 AM EST up reply actions
But you're right...
Baseball has an advantage. Hopefully, we can come up with some meaningful statistics.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 10:44 AM EST up reply actions
If I told you about it every time I walked around the block it would be easy to keep stats about that as well. But it would still be boring.
I dislike Matt Hughes. Shogun beat him like a dirty horse.
by MonkeyCHops on Jan 13, 2010 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
This is a great first step though, can’t wait to see where it goes.
I dislike Matt Hughes. Shogun beat him like a dirty horse.
by MonkeyCHops on Jan 13, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Question: Are power strikes limited to only hand techniques? For instance, are head kicks considered a power strike?
No, these are all power strikes in the standing (distance striking) department, so head kicks would count.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions
If this statistic is supposed to tell us which fighters "generally have a higher chance of ending someone’s night " isn’t it failing dramatically? Which isn’t your fault of course. Just an indication that all power punches are not created equally.
Caol Uno: 2 career KO’s
Frank Mir: 2 Career KO’s
These are two among many light punchers on the list.
How are you accounting for activity level and workrate? Wouldn’t you need to figure in knockdowns or KOs in order to determine who is an effective and powerful striker? I mean, real world success seems important to the equation. Take a boxing example… I’m sure Paulie Malignaggi has landed more power shots in his career than Kelly Pavlik. That likely would land Paulie near the top of the list here, but does it indicate anything about whether he “generally ha(s) a higher chance of ending someone’s night?” Clearly Pavlick does.
by Jonathan Snowden on Jan 13, 2010 10:49 AM EST reply actions
Well, the lack of ability to guage the power of a so-called power punch is what is causing this discrepancy. Power punches for two fighters aren’t equal and I’m not sure if that will ever be able to be accurately portrayed statistically.
Power is only relative to your opponent. You’d have to come up with some opponent adjusted Power Rating. Similar to the ERA+ in baseball, which adjusts a pitcher’s ERA to the variability in the ballparks (some parks favoring hitters, some favoring pitchers).
by WestbergIDFC on Jan 13, 2010 10:59 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly, except it’s nearly impossible to make adjustments on factors that are hard to measure. How would we go about measuring each fighter’s power? It’d have to be based on outcomes I suppose or a ratio of output and volume in comparison to their damage or knockdowns. Something of that nature.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions
To Mythbusters!
They got Fitch in an episode at least…
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Yeah, we’d have to quantify each fighter, but then each fighter could improve or add strength. and then there is that whole… some guys have it and some guys don’t issue.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
Right.
I said this with more sarcasm than actual meaningful input. He’s one of the only fighters I know who has publicly had punching power measured, but it was from flat on his back with about two inches to move. Even with accurate reports on pressure or force behind a punch, you can’t promise meaning for the results. McFedries isn’t as physically powerful as Forrest, but he has the intangible and immeasurable knock-you-the-fuck-out ability in spades.
I’d love to see the numbers on Carwin, even though he obviously doesn’t meet the minimum requirements for time or attempts. Or at least have an idea where he ranks.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
The only reason a fighter would have “generally a higher chance of ending someone’s night” is because they do happen to LAND more power strikes in correlation to their own attempts. As I stated, there are exceptions in that a strike may look very powerful and be tabulated as a power strike, but the fighter may not have a history of actual fight-stopping power. Caol Uno and Frank Mir are perfect examples of that.
My own opinion is that the stat has some hinting toward a “higher chance of ending someone’s night”, but it isn’t an accurate theory obviously, as you pointed out.
As I stated, on paper, this stat should simply give fans an idea of how effective a fighter is in landing power strikes in the striking portion of his fights. The higher the number, the more effective the fighter has been in throwing power and landing in correlation to the amount of attempts they’ve thrown. Anderson Silva is landing a high amount of power strikes in comparison to his total attempts, which is fairly impressive when you see him at over .40
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:11 AM EST up reply actions
The number two fighter on this list is Lyoto Machida: he has 4 KOs in 16 fights/wins, one from cuts. While I know the narrative has shifted a little on him as far as being a finisher goes, in general for his career, he is not a powerful striker. The numbers depict him as an accurate striker though, which is certainly true.
by VirtualBalboa on Jan 13, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
This is true, but think about this…
Lyoto doesn’t throw a lot of strikes at all. That’s probably the biggest reason why he’s ranked so high. He has low attempts, and for those attempts, he’s been able to daze opponents. I’m assuming that those dazing strikes and knockdowns have counted as power strikes. I’d have to look into his history of fights and how they were scored to get a more accurate depiction of how his score is that high, but that’s what I’m assuming here.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
ISO in baseball doesn’t merely do a statistical analysis of every time the batter makes contact with the ball. It analyzes the end result of the contact with the ball: ergo, ISO gives home runs a higher value than singles. It looks to me like this formula counts all strikes as being singles rather than having any differentiation. Obviously its difficult to include single KO shots, but some value has to be ascribed to them; I’d say a single KO is worth, say, 20 or 30 power punches that don’t lead to KOs. Maybe use a number and then run it to the next power: power strikes = 2, strikes that lead to knockdowns or hurt fighters = 4, KOs = 16.
This is a good idea, however, trying to quantify strikes that “hurt” fighters is shaky ground. How would one judge the kick that Cung Le gave to Frank Shamrock that essentially ended the fight. The kick was clearly blocked, but broke his arm and subsequently ended the fight.
by WestbergIDFC on Jan 13, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
Or strikes that cause cuts: You’re right. There are some random items in here that change things. But the point is that all strikes aren’t the same. KOs are certainly more indicative of power than merely landing power shots.
by VirtualBalboa on Jan 13, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions
Ascribing random coefficients is going to introduce arbitrary bias into the stat.
Baseball’s ability to delineate the value of an outcome (run expectancy matrix) is so unique that it’s hard to apply something similar to MMA.
Think; It's not illegal yet.
I agree about the difficulty. That said, I don’t see how you can do a rating for power without figuring in knockouts. They are to striking what HRs are to slugging. If you removed individual values from the number of bases covered in a hit in baseball, Rickey Henderson would have an ISO close to Barry Bonds.
by VirtualBalboa on Jan 13, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions
I'm not defending the analogy to baseball's ISO
I’m just saying that attaching coefficients to punches isn’t going to improve the statistic, imo.
Think; It's not illegal yet.
What it would do… is give us a better idea of who actually KNOCKS people out if we put a sizable coefficient on knockouts, which might be something to explore.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:40 AM EST up reply actions
I mentioned this above, but stats based around submissions could have some possible merit. There can really be no bias involved. Either someone tapped out due to submission or they didn’t. Categorizing what an “attempted submission” could be tricky, but in my opinion, much easier to categorize than strikes.
I think it would be interesting to see a successful submission percentage. You could further stratify that into, how many submissions were successful from varying positions, thus generating a possible legitimate submission-based scouting report.
For example, If BJ Penn gets your back, his succesful submission % goes up say… 50%. Or, say, 75% of Penn’s submission attempts come from his guard, etc.
by WestbergIDFC on Jan 13, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions
And this is actually correct. MMA doesn’t have some sort of number we can ascribe to each strike. Baseball does. A double is two bases, a triple is 3, and home run is 4. We don’t have that in MMA.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
How are knockouts different than home runs for statistical value? I don’t see it.
by VirtualBalboa on Jan 13, 2010 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
Because those multipliers are in line with total bases, which is intertwined in the ISO stat in baseball. A HR is 4 bases, triple is 3, double is 2, and a single is 1. What is power strike, strikes that cuts or damages an opponent, a knockdown strike, and a knockout strike. We’d have to randomly put on multipliers to those that have no meaning really.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions
I understand that creating a value for KOs is largely subjective. However, in order to establish efficency at striking, not merely accuracy, it is necessary. There’s no two ways around it. Its your most objective value for power.
by VirtualBalboa on Jan 13, 2010 11:43 AM EST up reply actions
I actually have some models for this… but I need to determine multipliers. Any system would work at first generally… but as WestbergIDFC states below… it’s tough to quantify strikes that “hurt” fighters. We do have a determination of that in our database however, so I’ll see what I can come up with.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
It’s a nice first step. But this stat needs a lot more data to be meaningful.
If anything, it another stat that tells us how bad ass Anderson is.
by dancingChicken on Jan 13, 2010 11:01 AM EST reply actions
In MMA isn’t there a problem with the very notion of “power shots?” With 4 OZ gloves the traditional “power shot” is out the window immediately. Forrest Griffin was knocked down and out with a jab. So was Kimbo. Any punch to the button is a power shot.
by Jonathan Snowden on Jan 13, 2010 11:13 AM EST reply actions
We actually discussed this, and it really came down to a discussion of B.J. Penn’s jab. But these conversations are exactly what we’re trying to bring out with the project. We want meaningful discussions on these things.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 11:16 AM EST up reply actions
What about the ichiro suzuki’s of the MMA world? Every year baseball stats underate him. How will these stats for MMA correctly judge a fighters ablitity?
It’ll take us some time to get there. We need some base stats before we can start determining predictors like PECOTA does or even some of the Bayesian models.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions
That’s not exactly true. Baseball stats don’t underrate Ichiro. They accurately say he’s awesome. Predicting his future success is where the models have trouble. Nobody in history has played baseball exactly like Ichiro and since the predictions are based on historical data from all players, they never successfully predict Ichiro’s seasons.
It's not that the stats underrate him.
It’s the people. It took YEARS for people to realize OBP is more valuable then BA. In people’s eyes some people think BA is the be all end all. See: Adam Dunn.
Last year alone the stats say he was worth $23.1 million with his stick and on defense.
http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1101&position=OF
AWmusic - mp3 blog.
http://twitter.com/awmusicblog
What are your thoughts on selection effects through matchmaking?
We often hear that “styles make fights.” If matchmakers take this into account, i.e. opponent assignment isn’t like random, it could matter.
I haven’t thought it through. It could be interesting. Just throwing that out there.
by former tuf noob on Jan 13, 2010 2:17 PM EST reply actions
Yes, this does have an affect on this stat as well. Some numbers are probably skewed a bit because a striker wasn’t able to keep the fight where he wanted it.
Obviously, ground fighters aren’t on this list, or are very low on the list. This is why we will likely have a separate clinch and ground stat for Isolated Power.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 2:32 PM EST up reply actions
I actually think you’re protected from the skew in the case you mention because you’re scaling by strikes attempted.
I was thinking more along the lines of striking defense. Suppose fighter A gets matched with a group that has better striking defense and fighter B gets matched with a group that has worse striking defense. Then your measure would be inaccurate.
Unfortunately, I don’t have good example to show why this would be important. But the concept still seems worth thinking about, especially since you don’t have random assignment of opponents.
Looking forward to future posts/stats.
by former tuf noob on Jan 14, 2010 6:11 PM EST up reply actions
This could be combated if we could come up with an accurate way to measure the defensive abilities of each fighter in a meaningful way.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 18, 2010 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
This would be analogous to baseball stats like ERA+ that take into account specific ballparks. It’s not impossible to take it that extra step and account for opponent to some degree, it just takes a lot more work.
To me it seems it would be easier because the conditions at each baseball stadium are more “fixed” than they are with the groups of opponents each MMA fighter has faced. (This also makes it more interesting.)
How is the baseball adjustment done?
by former tuf noob on Jan 14, 2010 6:18 PM EST up reply actions
My idea
Right now this statistic is more like a “slugging” percentage if using an analogous representation to baseball. Basically on average Anderson Silva is going to throw a power strike and land 40% of the time. Much like slugging percentage does for me.
As has been said before:
I think we can further elaborate on this stat to include knockdowns and knockouts from standing. You said that you have trouble quantifying right? Why don’t we just take the average KD to KO ratio standing in the UFC from a given time period. And choose a good estimate from this data?
E.g. if for every 5 knockdowns in a fight, 1 is a KO, a KO should be weight 4 times the value. I think this is the best way of doing it – if it can be quantified rather then arbitrary numbers.
I also don’t think I would apply a value of 1 for a KD. Rather I found find the % of KDs to total strikes landed and apply that value in a such way that these strikes count towards a fighters power rather then power strikes landed.
This then would probably be indicative of an ISOS.
AWmusic - mp3 blog.
http://twitter.com/awmusicblog
Tons of errors
so here’s my edited comment:
Right now this statistic is more like a "slugging" percentage if using an analogous example to baseball. Basically on average Anderson Silva is going to throw a power strike and land with it 40% of the time. I don’t really think that represents the ISOP stat in baseball.
As has been said before:
I think we can further elaborate on this stat to include knockdowns and knockouts from standing. You said that you have trouble quantifying right? Why don’t we just take the average KD to KO ratio standing in the UFC from a given time period. And choose a good estimate from this data?
E.g. if for every 5 knockdowns in a fight, 1 is a KO, a KO should be weight 4 times the value. I think this is the best way of doing it – if it can be quantified rather then arbitrary numbers.
I also don’t think I would apply a value of 1 for a KD. Rather I found find the % of KDs to total strikes landed and apply that value in a such way that these strikes count towards a fighters power rather then power strikes landed. I think this area may have some arbitrariness involved but a 1/X value might work…who knows.
This then would probably be indicative of an ISOS..
AWmusic - mp3 blog.
http://twitter.com/awmusicblog
I have thought about this, and I’m going to model something like this in the very soon future. My only qualm is that power lands should probably have a coefficient as well if we are going to base this on TOTAL ATTEMPTS across the board in the striking department.
So…
Isolated Striking Power (ISOS) = (Total Standing Strikes Landed Overall – Total Standing Regular Strikes) / Total Standing Attempts
Except
Total Standing Strikes Landed Overall would become much different.
We could put coefficients on regular strikes, power strikes, and then formulate KD and KO coefficients as well. But power strikes would need some sort of coefficient.
We could set it up as reg strikes * 1, power strikes * 2, kd’s * 3, and ko’s * 4.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions
Hmm
This is what I thought of while eating:
reg strikes X 1
power strikes X 1/( 1 – [Regular Standing Strikes Landed – Power Strikes Landed/Total Standing Attempts])
The coefficient would then be related to average of regular strikes landed minus power strikes landed over total standing attempts. I figure it could follow for the other categories to find a suitable coefficient.
knockdowns X 1/(1 – [RSL – KDs/Total Standing Attempts])
knockouts X 1/ (1- [RSL- KOS/TSA])
thoughts? might need tweaking hmm let me test this out, gonna post this anyway.
AWmusic - mp3 blog.
http://twitter.com/awmusicblog
I think
I like the RSSL – PSL/TSA ratio, tested it out but actually instead knockdowns should be a ratio between Power Strikes and not regular strikes.
so 1/1 – [Power Strikes Landed Standing – Knockdowns Standing]/ Total Standing Attempts) might be a better indicator of someone’s power.
AWmusic - mp3 blog.
http://twitter.com/awmusicblog
i think the whole power and non power shots seperated is definitely the wrong approach. This is not boxing people you have to throw that mindset away like everything else in the sport.
i think a good way to start comparative to baseball is average and hrs
average= total landed/total attempted
(hr)= opponent rocked, knocked down, knocked out/ total strikes attempted or since those numbers are gunna make a really low percentage possibly strikes landed
but total attemped would be more accurate and people would have to accept the setting up of strikes strategy
takedowns/takedown defense
sub o / sub d
pretty simple if u ask me… and do all the stats in reverse and u got urself some pretty realistic stats and something to base things off of..
clinch work is all u
Those stats seem to be readily available already.
I think they’re looking for some complicated statistics that give a good indicator of fighters skills that one can’t easily do on their own.
AWmusic - mp3 blog.
http://twitter.com/awmusicblog
We already have all of those statistics, although I suppose they are readily available to the public yet.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 13, 2010 5:58 PM EST up reply actions
good that makes things easier..now if u wanna make it similiar to baseball i mean those stats get crazy i dont even no what isos is and is pretty crazy… i think those regular stats do a good enough job average hr runs rbi clutch avg hr rb for hitters basically outline everything u wood wanna no about a hitter oh add on on base pct maybe strikeout
if u wanna make some master formula then off of the baseball formula
maybe u input rocked (2) , knocked down (3) ko (4) a punch landed being 1 similar to single double triple homerun
obviously this isnt gunna work but for solely power shots but maybe total offensive strikes output
also the numbers should be different variables maybe make rocked 3 pts knocked down 5 pts and kncoked out 10
If we include non-UFC fights for Uno, he drops considerably. I believe his number stems from his earlier UFC fights.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Jan 14, 2010 8:49 AM EST up reply actions

by 
















