Lift the Ban Watch: Former New York State Governor Patakai Now Favors Legalization of Mixed Martial Arts
Proponents of MMA legalization are striking the right tone with legislators by tying in efforts at sanctioning to closing budget shortfalls in the state government:
New York state should legalize "ultimate fighting" to help close a $7 billion deficit, Governor David Paterson said on Monday, though a previous Republican governor outlawed the sport.
The contests, which combine martial arts with boxing and allow contestants to use choke holds, could boost hotel and sales tax revenues. The sport's main sponsor, the Ultimate Fighting Championship, says 42 states have approved regulations for these matches, according to its web site.
Governor George Pataki in 1997 said the no-holds sport was "barbaric" and placed a ban on it.
He did, indeed, say that. Except now he's formally changed his position:
Former Gov. George Pataki, who once called ultimate fighting barbaric and had it banned in 2001 in New York, now supports its legalization.
"With more rigorous oversight, training and medical requirements - mixed martial arts has made considerable strides to ensure the safety of participants," said Pataki spokesman David Catalfamo.
"With these measures in mind, Gov. Pataki would be supportive of allowing the sport in New York in today," he told the Daily News.
...
The News reported yesterday that Gov. Paterson plans to include a call to legalize the controversial sport in his 2010-11 budget proposal due out next week.
If it's budget pressure and less intellectual firepower that forces legislators to bend, so be it. By hook or by crook, the train on MMA legalization appears to have left the station. And I have to commend the UFC's efforts: while reaching out to thought leaders in the media would've been nice, the real key was establishing the correct talking points backed in deliverable data for lawmakers. They did that very, very well.
We can't count our chickens before they've hatched, but Pataki's sanctioning should help corral support from key constituencies and is evidence of the substantial progress made by the UFC's lobbyists.
As a Washington, DC resident, I have no choice but to respect that. They have thus far played the game well.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think it will get through. All signs pointed to it gong through last year until the state senate fell apart (not about the mma bill, it literally just stopped functioning). The combo of the patterson and pataki plus the money problems should help grease the skids a little faster this year.
If all else fails, he should just say that all the money from mma will go towards giving students metrocards, how could anyone be against kids going to school?
I don"t care what anyones says..
florian is the top contender for the 155 title! he may not ever beat BJ, but he will always be the #2. maynard doesn’t finsih fights! tyson griffin, maynard, sherk are always going to be fighting each other to a split or UD. sanchez, gomi, & florian are a toss up when they face each other but i would still put my money on florian.
BJ needs to fight a 170 top contender other than GSP
by mikeybear32 on Jan 12, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
off topic completely and i totally agree that florian is the #2 in 155 even above aoki and eddie alvarez, but he convincinly lost to bj and bjs gotta fight the rest of the contenders cause u never know what could happen, he could get caught, he could just come out and suck one night, like chris berman says thats why they play the game
Whatever gets the job done
I like these updates.
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Jan 12, 2010 12:28 PM EST reply actions
agreed. MMA in the Garden…YUS!
If Derek Jeter clubbed a baby seal on earth day while wearing a mink coat and crocodile skin boots while burning tires on an iceberg, the reaction would be "Its OK Derek, you’re a Yankee." -First mammal to wear pants
at this point theres really no reason to keep it banned
everyone who stands against this really has no argument anymore, its not dangerous, its not barbaric, noones ever been seriously injured in the ufc, what else do they need to sanction it? the fact that it still isnt shows how slowly and terribly the goverment works sometimes
The only way this works though is for the rules approved to be the American-standard Unified Rules (re: Montreal rules — are their only difference from the UR being “no stomping of the opponent’s feet”?), and not Bob Reilly’s deliberately gutted version limiting elbow strikes and banning ground-and-pound…
agreed
If Derek Jeter clubbed a baby seal on earth day while wearing a mink coat and crocodile skin boots while burning tires on an iceberg, the reaction would be "Its OK Derek, you’re a Yankee." -First mammal to wear pants
reply fail
If Derek Jeter clubbed a baby seal on earth day while wearing a mink coat and crocodile skin boots while burning tires on an iceberg, the reaction would be "Its OK Derek, you’re a Yankee." -First mammal to wear pants
If NY doesn't move quickly in the first half of the year...
the UFC should drive the point home by having several events in cities close to NY so that the state legislature can see the millions of dollars leaving the state and helping the economies of surrounding areas.
The Unions
Now we might see if there was anything to the story that it was a union beef with Station Casinos that scuttled the last attempt at legalization.
Dana and Lorrenzo on Fox News.
They’re that idiot Cavuto’s show.
by snakecharmer1340 on Jan 12, 2010 4:46 PM EST reply actions
The contests, which combine martial arts with boxing and allow contestants to use choke holds
This sounds very strange to me. It sounds a lot like this:
Human beings, which are combinations of thighs and noses and are known to moan on occasion
My motto,
As I live and learn,
is:
Dig and Be Dug
In Return.
-Langston Hughes (no relation to Matt)

by 


















