Quote of the Day: Scott Coker - "I Don’t Think This Will Escalate"
"Why would one fighter create a war?"-- Scott Coker remains optimistic of his relationship with UFC President Dana White.
"I would hate to think this would be the catalyst for this to escalate. To me, I’m still of the feeling that everything’s going to be OK. We’re running our business the way we’re running it and they’re going to continue with their successful business. I guess they say only time will tell."
"We’re comfortable doing (co-promotion with M-1), and let’s face it –- Fedor is the greatest heavyweight in the world."
HT: Sherdog.com
0 recs |
345 comments
|
Comments
Scott Coker is naive and overly optimistic. He has brought a knife to war that includes tanks, missles, and a fully equiped airforce.
Signing anybody big and potentially going on CBS or PPV is a direct threat to the UFC’s business model. They will attack back.
And unfortunetly, Coker didn’t pick up the right fighter to win this war. Fedor doesn’t have the name value. The UFC made a small signing this week that hasn’t gotten much discussion. His name is TITO ORTIZ. That is the guy Scott Coker should have gone after. He is a proven draw with a lot of fans. Fedor isn’t even a blimp on the PPV radar compared to Ortiz. And yet by signing Fedor, Coker has brought war upon himself.
I thought Coker was smarter then this. I guess not.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 7:37 PM EDT reply actions 6 recs
And for anybody who will say Coker has been running shows for 20 years and knows what he is doing….
Coker has been running regional shows for 20 years. He has never run a major company or a national/international fighting company.
Dana White has a proven track record of running an international MMA business. Lorenzo Fertitta built up his business to become a billionaire.
He just can’t compete with that. Even with Showtime on his side. White & Fertitta have more vested interest in MMA then Showtime does. And the one’s who have the most vested interest almost always seem to win.
Coker’s in for a world of hurt.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
I’m not going to get too crazy about an impending war until the SF/DREAM thing is more publicly detailed. I want both (all three?) entities to survive this skirmish and I don’t know for certain that Dana and the Fertitta’s are aiming to destroy Coker must the same as they did Atencio/The Shaw’s.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Simple business strategy forces the UFC’s hand on this one.
Just like the Microsoft and Google’s of the technology world…. When you are the biggest player in your field, you MUST go directly after the rising competition or potentially face reduced profits in the future.
Like I said, the UFC’shand has been forced on this one. As the largest MMA company, they are almost required to have this strategy to protect their assets.
The fact that Coker didn’t think that part through is amazing…..
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
What’s happening so far is most akin to the Apple C&D with Palm regarding multi-touch. In the fallout, they didn’t exactly go to war. Apple protected their business interests and did their due diligence, which is why I won’t fault Zuffa for making their case for bargaining rights with Fedor and Mousasi. But it’s just too early to declare that Strikeforce will take up residence on Dana’s infamous promotional headstone.
(…and the Palm Pre still sucks more than the G1 and iPhone.)
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it is more Showtime and CBS that Dana wants to torpedo.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 4, 2009 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
<3 Apple.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 4, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen.
"The path to enlightenment is through suffering"
by RearNakedChoker on Aug 5, 2009 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As if I needed another reason to hate you…
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 5, 2009 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Getting hated by you is a pleasure, good sir
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 5, 2009 1:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 5, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You are dead to me…
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 5, 2009 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at me!
I pay $40,000 for a laptop and put a sticker on my rear windshield and wear tight jeans! I love Apple!
Fucking Apple. Right in my backyard and I still hate them.
BOOSH
by Farthammer on Aug 5, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
Strikeforce was founded by Scott Coker in 1985 and the original premise of the company was based around kick-boxing fights and competitions. As shows were continuously put on, people started to take notice of Strikeforce as a legitimate kick-boxing organisation and gained many loyal followers of the sport. Strikeforce gained notoriety 10 years later when they became exclusive providers of martial arts for the major USA sports network ESPN, which proved to be successful for both companies, with Strikeforce gaining attention from the general public and ESPN attracting decent viewing figures from the shows.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Putting on taped delayed ESPN filler show is hardly the same as running a billion dollar business (Fertitta) or running an internationally successful MMA company (White).
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strikeforce has put on shows internationally, just letting you know.
Coker has worked in Japan and other countries as well.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re not scoring points on formalities. His point is clear.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but its not as if Strikeforce hasn’t scored deals with ESPN, NBC, Showtime/CBS, and HDNet. Its not like they are some small regional show getting their first taste at how big boy business works in the fight game.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They are going to get Murrrrred.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you not listen to Coker? There is no war between them. Its just fan boy talk.
=)
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amended
The term “fanboy” is fanboy talk.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
He’s at war whether he likes it or not. Wake up, time to die.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOTR: The Two Towers: “Open War Is Upon You, Whether You Would Risk It Or Not”
Unfortunetly for Coker, Fedor is no Gandalf The White to save the day….
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His point is that he’s not as experienced in MMA at this level as Dana. Good? Good…
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I posted on this earlier
Coker spent months talking to Tito and believed he had a deal. It was the UFC’s grabbing of Tito that triggered the war, not the Fedor signing.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s not what triggered it… Cung le is what first triggered it. Zuffa has been poking for a while now and it has been increasing every month. Strikeforce has decided to make this its last stand instead of getting comfortable in its role.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
I don't buy it
I don’t think Dana would have been nearly as complimentary to Coker all this time had this been the case.
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
LOL
Cung Le triggered it.
That is some funny sh*t.
Stop calling me Dana, I said he is filming a movie!!!
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ah that too
but basically once strikeforce signed the cbs/showtime deal, they were locked into this. zuffa is going to want/need anyone who could headline a showtime or CBS card and get ratings.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, it’s almost like this was out of Coker’s hands. Showtime and CBS want to push this and get results. I would really like to pick Coker’s brain for how he really feels on this. Deep down he might think he is screwed.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still...
They aren’t going out of business without Tito and he should have known they were poking the bear by signing Fedor. Now with M-1 leaching on to them, going out of business is a very real possibility.
by Razzel on Aug 4, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what should Coker have done? Not signed Fedor and be satisfied with remaining a permanent #2? Fedor didn’t sign with the UFC because DW messed up big time. Not everybody is a fan of the bipolar ways of DW.
by ludakrish on Aug 4, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being the permanent number 2 is fine.
The USFL was making money until they tried to challenge the NFL. Arena Football lasted for 20 years and would have lasted more if all the owners didn’t get killed in the recession. Go anywhere in the country and you’ll find minor league baseball thriving. There are plenty of restaurants all over the world that aren’t trying to be the next mcdonalds.
Sometimes being a profitable number 2 is better than being a dead number 0.
by Phildo on Aug 4, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 11 recs
^^ This
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
^^ This
especially since I’ve been using the USFL to make a point in a mma discussion on many different topics for the past few years…(even just yesterday on BE as well)
by Reaser16 on Aug 4, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
jesus
do you think Showtime/CBS invested in Strikeforce for them to do nice little shows?
No.
they are putting huge pressure on Coker to deliver big ratings. and not just on showtime.
They want Kimbo ratings without the Kimbo fall out.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And there's the problem with this move..
It’s either massive success or massive failure. There is no middle ground anymore.
by Razzel on Aug 4, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fine with you maybe...
but a free market system is based on competition and the antithesis is a monopoly – which the UFC will have if Strikeforce chooses to be #2. Sometimes to get big you have to aim big.
by ludakrish on Aug 4, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
A little too intense, Always Relaxing?
We’re the fans let them worry about it. =)
GSP: I pulled my groin.
Greg Jackson: I don't care Georges! HIT HIM WITH YOUR GROIN!
by xFenixKnightx on Aug 4, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, wait wait, oh yeah.....hahahahahahahahahahahaha
Everyone has a game plan, untell they get hit.
by mma is #1 on Aug 4, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There are no problems!
Are you kidding me? Dana White and the UFC are not going to take this lying down. The OP is right. Fedor is not a draw.
by pwdminotauro on Aug 4, 2009 7:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's official. He's nuts.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 4, 2009 7:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He is talking like the standard public person. Dana White has spoiled people by not pulling his punches when he talks.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 4, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scott Coker
Diplomatic as always.
=)
What fans really wanted to hear:
Coker:
“F**k Dana! F**k That S**t! We have the #1 f*ck*ng male fighter in the world! Tell Lesnar and those other HW’s that if they want to fight the best, come to m’f*ck’n Strikeforce! Do you want to be the best m’f*ck’n HW fighter in the world? WAR WAR WAR! UFC started this sh*t years ago, when they said we were just a kick boxing promoter and that kick boxing was bad for MMA. F*ck that sh*t!”
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 7:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dude
Come on.. Stop spreading a butter knife over the population.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Don’t get too comfortable.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This one seems more appropriate with the DREAM alliance
“I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.”
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 4, 2009 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
Reccedy rec rec’d
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 4, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think Dana and Co. are gonna go after Coker and SF with as much venom as they did with Affliction and Elite XC, but I do think Coker has ruffled Zuffa’s feathers by signing Fedor. We’ll have to wait and see if SF can survive the onslaught that I think will be coming from the UFC.
by filipinomix2oo0 on Aug 4, 2009 7:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
France, Spring 1940
I don’t think the Germans have any intention of attacking at all this year.
Neville Chamberline, British PM
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 8:16 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
Which would equate Zuffa to Hitler
Just sayin
by argyle on Aug 4, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zuffa would be Germany. Dana White would be Hitler.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Aug 4, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hitler was only 10% owner?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 4, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He only got 32% of the popular vote.
Time to kill this thread.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Aug 4, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not going to relish in Strikeforce getting killed
Like the rest of the people here. However, Coker can’t possibly believe that the UFC will leave them alone. Strikeforce is the last organization left standing. Once they’re gone, the UFC will be the only game in town that matters. They will get their pick of which networks to sign and they will get it on their own terms.
by cyph on Aug 4, 2009 8:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
POLL
SERIOUS QUESTION AND I WOULD LIKE ALL OF YOU (inluding BE crew) TO INPUT YOUR OPINIONS: (please)
If you were Zuffa would you bet on cain to beat fedor? If you win the bet this whole Fedor mess goes away… if you lose you’re out around 4 million dollars.
If you wouldn’t take this bet (as Zuffa) is there another Zuffa fighter you would take this bet on?
Keep in mind even though this match would be in a closed door scenario (like the ultimate fighter matches) Finkie would have overseas rights to it… so Lesnar, Randy, Carwin are out of the question (i am assuming cain will lose to carwin).
Please reply with your answers below:
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 8:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If no would would you take this bet on Anderson Silva? or Machida?
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s hard to pick anyone against Fedor except maybe Lesnar. If I had to choose anyone else, though, I guess it would be Machida.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Aug 4, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd take the bet with Cain 4 SURE
Not Anderson or Machida.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dos Santos – The man has bricks for hands and he’s fast as hell. He’s also a Nogueira disciple.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 4, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s an interesting idea.
I’d take Machida, not Anderson. Machida has great takedown defense in the clinch.
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
now I want your take from a business angle combined with your analysis above…
Consider what a loss would mean to anderson versus MAchida and also the fact that Anderson has been a “problem child” lately. combine this with your take on their chances of winning.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stylistically none of the heavyweights can really do it. Machida is just so odd I don’t know Fedor could fig him out. Anderson could KO fedor, but I think Fedor takes him down and finishes from top position.
Machida from a business perspective is more risky. He’s undefeated and even worse, he’s a draw now. It’s worth it though if they did it because there’s big problems in the future if Brock an Randy want to leave to fight the undefeated Fedor. If this happens, and I highly doubt it, I’d go with Machida.
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Anderson loses to Fedor you really cant take anything away from him… Fedor has doesnt shoot – his takedowns are from the clinch.
You’d still take Machida?
I Guarantee Couture or Lesnar or any other Zuffa HW wont be leaving to fight fedor. I just think this avenue will be cheaper in the long run.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dan took Anderson down from the clinch. I just think Machida can keep this standing and beat Fedor there. I understand Anderson is less risky. But if you come to me and say who is most likely to beat Fedor on the UFC roster? The answer is Lyoto Machida. because nobody can figure him out.
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Honestly, no. I don’t think I’d bet on Cain to win that fight. Machida I would seriously consider. What Fedor had trouble against with Arlovski was quick, angular striking. If Machida can stay on his feet and work angles then MAAAYBE I’d consider betting on him.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Machida
I’ve been saying this for a while now, Machida has the best shot of any fighter to beat Fedor. Although now that Brock is on the scene perhaps it’s him instead.
Machida is great where Fedor has trouble and is so amazingly defensive against the things Fedor is best at.
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what’s your take on Anderson? what kind of odds would you give him?
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, there is the angular striking and speed thing which is good. BUT he isn’t nearly as good at avoiding the takedowns and I think he would lose a decision where Fedor is able to hang out on top of him.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To add to this, not only is Anderson not as good at avoiding takedowns he pretty mcuh invites them with the way he fights. He’d get ground and pounded to “bolivian”
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
5 rounds is Andersons advantage or Fedors? same question with Machida?
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
5 rounds favors fedor over anderson
because I think he’ll only need one take down to finish Silva.
Machida, that’s a hard one. I said no before because I don’t see him hitting hard enough to finish Fedor and if Fedor caught him with one of those off balance hooks that Rashad caught Machida with, Lyoto is finished.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d like to say it favors Fedor. Three rounds increases variance which would allow a less skilled fighter to steal a decision more often.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Against Anderson, anything favors Fedor. He takes Anderson down, eventually and wears him out so Anderson can’t even use any superior cardio. Anderson may be able to outbox him in the standup, but I don’t think he’ll have the power to finish him (just based on physics). So I’m guessing it’ll look a little like St. Pierre vs . BJ Penn. Now Machida? Interesting? Who knows, maybe he’s Karate Machida is so good he keeps it standing and picks him apart, winning a frustrating unanimous decision.
And Cain. I wouldn’t bet on him. I really don’t think he’s as talented as people think. He’s big. He’s strong. He can get up. And he can hit, but he hasn’t faced an athlete yet (very few in HW).
by nottheface on Aug 4, 2009 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do you mean by this?
Anderson may be able to outbox him in the standup, but I don’t think he’ll have the power to finish him (just based on physics).
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
I don’t get that. Anderson would probably be 210ish for the fight. Fedor at maybe 230. Small gloves. It’s very possible to KO him
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was probably a little flippant with the comment, but as any boxer knows the smaller guy generally generates less force (f=m*a) and a larger object displaces more force when hit. Now Anderson hits hard, I just don’t see him throwing a one punch knockout on a Heavyweight. Not saying it can’t happen but doubtful. And Machida? I don’t think he hits as hard as Anderson, but he’s incredible accurate. It’s just a volley, leaving you stunned and finally unconcious – see Evans (Thiago was a little misleading, he ran right into it and got it on the “button”, anyone goes out after that.
by nottheface on Aug 5, 2009 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d give Anderson and Machida a better shot than Cain, though I want to say Fedor probably wins a decision. The fact that both of them are so adept at avoiding damage and have excellent chins makes me like them more.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
elbows on the ground legal?
that’s why I give Cain the edge — I wouldn’t think he’d win 50% of the time, but I think he could cut Fedor bad enough to get a stoppage about 25% of the time.
I think the UFC should take that bet.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think 25% is being very very generous. Lemme run some numbers really quick.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since 2000, 922 fights with only 14 being listed as TKO by cut (1.5%).
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you fucking numbers people!
don’t interrupt my magical thinking with your cursed facts!
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Off topic;
But I watched Assault in the Ring last night. Great film, heartbreaking story.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Did you catch it last night, too?
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sunday or Monday night, I forget. That was some sad stuff right there, but then again, boxing has many of those stories. I have a feeling MMA will have some of those as well.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s pretty amazing how the concept of the film changed while filming it.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I was confused for second. He didn’t know who did it? What? He did know who did it? Huh?
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed…and I watched original airing…
by Reaser16 on Aug 4, 2009 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You think you’re soooooo cool..
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 4, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was REALLY good...
I also received an early copy of Tyson from Sony today…also good even though I hate Tyson.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
saw it and its great…
but I love Tyson.
:-)
by Reaser16 on Aug 4, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely agree
Really good stuff.
by filipinomix2oo0 on Aug 5, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Performify from MMA Junkie and I both agree that the only HW that Fedor should be less than a -500 favorite against RIGHT NOW is Brock Lesnar.
Fedor pounds Velasquez. Unless AKA wants to fuck up his progression and the UFC doesn’t mind flushing one of their best HW prospects down the toilet, I can’t see how this is good for anyone.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this would be after cain loses… but what do you think Andersons or Machida’s chances are?
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like everyone else’s, not very good.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I replied above. Better than Cain, not sure if I could quantify it without watching tape.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
any other light heavy weight, middleweight or hw in Zuffa? also keep in mind this fight may have to take place in a ring.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still think Randy is an interesting style match up that could give him problems. I think,in general, LHWs would be tougher fights for Fedor than HWs
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Top 5 Zuffa guys to challenge Fedor would be something like:
Lesnar
Machida
Silva
Carwin
Velasquez
Probably in that order. I think the offshore lines are pretty efficient on Fedor/Lesnar (right around -200 Fedor). I’d guess that Machida and Silva are between that and -500, but closer to the high end. I don’t think Carwin or Velasquez offer much at this point.
I’m apparently the only person in the world who thinks that Randy offers nothing for Fedor at 46. The only interest I would have in that fight is the historical significance of it. And the chance of seeing someone die in the ring.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
is 3 rounds more of advantage for Anderson or 5?
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Replied above.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
does Rampage deserve to be in this discussion? I think he’d have a real good shot at beating any one of those guys. (except maybe Machida)
by moopwontplay on Aug 4, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He’s probably in the top 10, easily the top 20. It’s just that after the first 2 or 3 guys, there’s not much difference in expected win percentage.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ignore my post below this one, if you like, as this pretty much covers it i imagine.
by woooburn on Aug 4, 2009 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i’m probably setting myself up for another un-rec, but what are your thoughts on a fedor/mir matchup? i’d probably give him as good a chance as cain, based on his ground skills, and the fact that he wouldn’t be outsized like he was lesnar. what say you?
by woooburn on Aug 4, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK after picking your fine brains here’s the answer I have come up with:
Anderson versus Fedor in a 5 round fight (will probably have to be in a ring but I am not sure yet… this show will not be marketed or televised in north america unless Anderson wins… it will be closed door like the ultimate fighter matches)
- If Anderson loses it doesnt take an ounce of his draw away as there’s none to begin with.
- Andersons best chance of winning is by taking Fedor out on the feet.
- Fedor can lay and pray for 3 rounds making Anderson winning the fight less likely.
I think Machida would be his toughest fight but the type of punches Fedor throws is is the type of punches Machida gets hit with (see BJ vs Machida) and there is more downside to Machida losing than Anderson because Machida is on an upswing in popularity (he is on his way to becoming the new “fedor”)
Cain doesnt pose enough of a threat to make the 4million dollar Zuffa gamble worth it.
Thanks guys… please pick this apart as much as you can and reply with your critiques.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think this is how I’d do it too.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Vitor or Dos Santos? If I’m taking the gamble, I’d go with somebody whose faster than Fedor, doesn’t need time to find a their rhythm, and can put his lights out quick.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IF Dos Santos beats crocop he’s a contender… dont want to waste that and if he loses it’s too risky to bet 4m on it. God knows which Vitor will show up so again too risky for 4m. Anderson is Vitor 2.0.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about Melvin Manhoef? That would be the most exciting 15 second fight ever.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The most important question: what are you driving at here?
by Luke Thomas on Aug 4, 2009 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’d also like to know the answer to that question.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Aug 4, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone post the Michael Jackson popcorn gif!
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Aug 4, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is exactly how I feel about this impending UFC/Strikeforce dustup.
Sometimes its more fun to watch the promotions smash and destroy each other than the actual fights.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rec’d for quickness!
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Aug 4, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re about to see why I get paid like an expensive hooker… but Luke, before you disappear I want to get your complete take on this:
If you were Zuffa who would you put in front of Fedor in a closed-door match knowing the consequences: If your guy loses you just blew 4m but if he wins you save over 10 million in the short term and probably over 40 million in the near long term??
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So where is BE’s cut? =P
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 4, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He’ll make the cheque out to “iiowyn”
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
is it wrong that I have http://www.sbnation.com/users/mmalogic bookmarked? (:
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Aug 4, 2009 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From what I can gather, we will only see the results of this in North America if Fedor loses. However, international rights are in the air, and if it involves Fedor, then that means M1 probably has the rights…
Since you don’t want to take the very top guys, you aren’t worried about it coming out of the viral video of Fedor beating say Cain. But, if Fedor loses, then it’s going to be all over everywhere and probably a week long ‘Unleashed Special’, right?
One question I have for this, how would the UFC treat the fighter they put up for this? It appears they will obviously be under contract still, but I would hate to see any backlash from a loss in an ending of a contract. Or would taking this fight put them in the Bonnar/Griffin category?
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no ending of contract infact Zuffa’s fighter will be paid well.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Needs to be Anderson Silva.
He matches up perfectly. He isn’t a draw t the casual fan. And being a Middleweight, he loses no luster if he loses to a Heavyweight.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially if they win
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I don’t want to repeat the points others have made, but for sure I’d do with Machida beyond anyone else. There are various arguments about how the fight at each stage would turnout, but I suspect the crux of the issue is that Machida can control distancing, timing and strategically make it difficult for Fedor to remain in position (you lose some of this in the ring). Fedor excels at a number of dimensions of the game, but outside of the CroCop fight I’ve had some questions about his distancing. He typically gets by on the ability to rapidly (read: physically) close distance in quick motion to the point where he is mostly comfortable in the clinch or to land a leaping hook. This is partly why you see Fedor getting taken down with surprising ease. He is light on his feet, but he over commits on apprehensive opponents. I suspect Machida has a more than equipped to handle Fedor’s speed. A) It wouldn’t be as pronounced against a natural light heavy, b) Machida’s speed is grossly underrated as he rarely puts himself in position where is forced into dramatic, quick or leaping escapes standing or on the ground and c) Fedor is highly frustratable. What makes Fedor so special is not the ability to avoid damage or problem areas, but to overcome them. He gets tagged, gets slammed, tripped, kicked and taken down, but he also finds a way to persevere. With Machida, he’s got the ability to off balance Fedor, keep him guessing, and most importantly, put him in trouble spots without falling into desperation to finish. I have issues with the idea Machida can stop him, but hurt him, damage him and outpoint him? Yeah, more than possible.
The weight class differential (more than the actual differential itself) mostly forgives Machida should he lose. Bank on it.
by Luke Thomas on Aug 4, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Luke have your seen the movie with Eric Bana and Brad Pitt… story about the Trojans…
there’s a seen in it where 2 armies are facing each other and the battle will be decided by one match and the king says to the fighter in the match “you have the ability to end all this bloodshed”…
well this is sort of that situation. This one match has the ability to end all the blood shed that will ensue… but in this scenario one army is way bigger than the other one.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If one army is soo much bigger than the other army, is it really worth it to be decided on one fight? Even if that fight might only get aired internationally?
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mitigating risk…
if the match doesnt go your way then you unleash the army.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This thing is a big risk. Anderson makes more sense from a business perspective. But you can’t trust him. He’s out for himself. I think Machida is the most likely to win and therefore the one you do. Go big or go home.
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rome, you have something here.
Weighing the risk to Machida’s marketability versus increasing the chance of the W.
give me your input on this.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How can you put everything on the line on the shoulders of someone you don’t absolutely trust? Zuffa doesn’t even trust him to perform against Forrest.
I don’t like the idea in general. Zuffa makes fedor a star every day, just ignore him. If I ran an MMA consulting company I would give the following advice: “act like Fedor does not exist.”
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
‘Just ignore him’ is the smartest thing to do.
If he wants to be serious, we’ll be over here being serious. Until then, go fight lighter opponents and fringe top ten guys somewhere else.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 4, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then him and Dan is a money fight that outdraws anything Fedor can do by a factor of 5. Why waste that for spite?
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
This is not a war against Fedor or Strikeforce…
There are elements at play that are trying to turn Zuffa’s business model into the Boxing business model.
This is their last stand and Fedor is their key.
You take Fedor away you deflate the last remaining hopes for this entire agenda.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not really because fedor was the last remain remnant of the non-zuffa dominant age.
he is the last one. once he’s gone no other “fedors” can ever emerge without Zuffa.
Think about it… the only way Fedor emerged was because Pride was dominant and they had the dominant HW weight class.
Once Fedor is gone the “vehicle” for which a “fedor” can emerge is implausible.
Now these elements want to create a “boxing” model where fighters can pad their records so this can occur.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
/\ this
people completely missed the point I was trying to make about why signing Fedor was so huge for Zuffa.
Getting Fedor in the Octagon is a GAME OVER move for any other promoter in the world who wants to be at the top of the field.
But it was not to be — Dana + M-1 Global is too much crazy for one board room IMO.
And Dana really needs to stop shit talking fighters. It doesn’t get him anything.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
And Strikeforce is in the crossfire. Likely due to Showtime wanting the offer to be made….
If this is for all the marbles…. Put Machida in there….. Yes the downside is huge, but the more I think about it, the more I think he can beat Fedor.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can’t they always wait for Fedor to lose and then offer tons of money to the person who beats him?
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But it was not to be — Dana + M-1 Global is too much crazy for one board room IMO.
LMAO, rec’d.
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what Im saying is we can risk 4m now and some of a fighters marketability and get to game over sooner rather than bleed these fuckers to death over the next 18 months spending 10 times that.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is better for strikeforce in the longterm.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because it gives them a chance….
Machida then….
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep in mind too that you need somebody who doesn’t buy into the Fedor hype.
That is what was great about Lesnar. He doesn’t hype up any opponent in his head. Therefore there is no added advantage for Fedor.
The guy who is chosen not only needs to believe he will beat him, but doesn’t hold Fedor on a pedestal.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can see that.
the whole “my fighter will fight for you, we get half the profit, it’s all good!” thing is not desirable to me.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like it.
However, what does this say about the Affliction-Fedor contract mess? Avoid all the court situation for this one-off fight? Or is this too much insight?
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Machida gets killed in a ring
he’ll get cornered and battered.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Aug 4, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This I think sadly, his style is made for a cage.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 4, 2009 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting to see Zuffa seemingly give into having the fight in a ring and not a cage. I can see some negative outcomes though from it taking place in an Octagon as that is synonymous with the UFC
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think someone who utilizes footwork as well as Machida would get trapped in the corner.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 5, 2009 12:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I might throw Rampage or even Forrest in there. Rampage is turning into a solid boxer (see Fedor vs. AA) although he doesn’t really move around much. But Fedor taking him down would be no easy task methinks. Forrest because of his hugeness, pressure and grit/heart/whatever you want to call it, although his fight with Silva will answer a lot of questions on that.
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Aug 4, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rampage should be in the mix but scheduling problems take him out of the picture.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what’s up? What’s the line of questioning all about?
by Luke Thomas on Aug 4, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
ya, I can’t pull the trigger on answering any of these hypotheticals without knowing what’s going on…
:-)
by Reaser16 on Aug 4, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like there might by a wager with StrikeForce to have Fedor fight a UFC fighter.
This might relate back to his garauntee that Fedor’s next fight will be for the UFC.
by MMA_Messiah on Aug 4, 2009 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Affliction contract?
… and this would then fulfill Fedor’s Affliction contract perhaps?
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think so.
And potential savings might have to do with UFC not needing Fedor anymore because he would have lost to a UFC Champion.
by MMA_Messiah on Aug 4, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson Silva makes the most sense.
He isn’t a draw. He is a middleweight. And he has the speed and striking to give Fedor fits.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for your input AR… I always appreciate your point of view.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The upside of Anderson Silva is he is threatening to retire in 3 fights and go fight Roy Jones anyway.
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
bingo!!!
Even though he is two weight classes below, they are the same size…. Actually, Silva is a little bit bigger.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah that’s one of the attributes he brings to the table in this situation.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So we can pretty much eliminate Brock from this equation because there would be too much risk involved there, no?
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I figured, just confirmation is of so is always soothing.
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Silva wants out soon anyways.
by MMA_Messiah on Aug 4, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And a closed door fight solves the fact that one promotion doesn’t want all eyes on CBS/Showtime or Spike/PPV
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson wouldn’t get laid and prayed on…
If Fedor got him to the floor and used his size, Anderson would be mincemeat. He would get crushed by Fedor’s underestimated power, and he could potentially get submitted. Long limbs aren’t exactly something you want against a guy with massive power. I imagine Filho has a hayday with Silva in training, hence why Silva always says Filho is unbelievable and he’d never fight him.
Secondly, Cain Velasquez would probably get KO’d by Fedor if the Kongo fight was any indication, and I still am not convinced that great wrestling can beat Fedor just yet. I’d like to see the fight though.
I think you’re spot on with the Machida vs. Fedor debate. Fedor’s style of punching and suprising accuracy with that style could spell disaster. But overall, Fedor’s size against LHWs and MWs is just too much IMO.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What’s the original question? Who would I bet on to beat Fedor? Out of Cain, Machida, or Anderson Silva?
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t take Cain either, after seeing him get ‘dropped’ by Kongo twice. Also, Cain doesn’t appear to have the punching power to finish off someone, and would therefore be doing a 3 or 5 round wrestling fight.
The question is, does Cain have good enough submission defense to defend Fedor for that long?
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, since you are insinuating some crazy idea brewing at Zuffa… is there training time for this fight?
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lemme ask one more question….
M-1 would be able to show this fight internationally, correct? So technically, the fighter in question wouldn’t want to be a massive appeal fighter.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then Anderson Silva is the answer.
He isn’t a massive appeal to UFC fans, and he has the striking acumen to give Fedor problems.
I still wouldn’t bet on him to win, but he’d be the most likely in my opinon. Machida still has some massive potential, but I think Luke might be right as well. His weight class is forgiving. I’d still say Silva.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus, Machida has his own aura. Losing to Fedor breaks that.
Anderson Silva is a Middleweight who fans can’t stand right now.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
That’s how I feel.
Anderson Silva, even if he loses, so what.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly, and then you can say Fedor beats another middleweight, when is he going to face legit heavyweights. (not saying that is true, just thinking of how UFC could cover themselves from this getting out)
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just think Machida is the only guy out there I would actually bet on to beat Fedor at even odds.
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I agree. Machida’s style would cause Fedor fits. But there is too much downside to that match-up. Hence the problem. Just like Lesnar is a good bet to beat Fedor. There is just too much downside.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Gonzaga?
Little to no downside and many people have side he has some skills that could make him a good matchup with Fedro.
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What
does he have that Nog doesnt other then size?
by dhny11 on Aug 4, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Power...striking...wrestling...
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A face that hasn’t been beaten in a million times by the some of the best fighters of all time?
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Refering to Nog back in the day, not the Nog of now.
by dhny11 on Aug 4, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even then...
(and remember…nog is my favorite fighter of all times)
he never had good wrestling or striking power and his “great boxing” has always been vastly overrated.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right, being accurate with your punches and having KO power are two entirely different things.
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
His brother is the far superior boxer.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 5, 2009 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh god yes he is… although Nog is dropping a little weight for the Couture fight. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a quicker, more agile Big Nog.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 5, 2009 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lil Nog in UFC pleaze
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 5, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t be on anyone at even odds vs. Fedor.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 4, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither would I. I think Fedor might trounce all those names, to be honest.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Honestly, i know with his “unbelievable power” and uncanny speed he would easily trounce anyone in the world, but a lot of these guys pose interesting challenges. It’s MMA, nothing is guaranteed.
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At even odds...
I would BET on Machida…
But Anderson is a better pick if you lose…
So, it’s a choice. Putting your marbles all on one guy to win, or a guy who has a good shot, but probably would lose.
The risk is that Machida could potentially be a huge star… although the UFC’s marketing machine could probably deflect all the negativity about the loss.
Really, Machida or Silva would work… but I’d actually BET on Machida at EVEN odds.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait...
You would bet on Machida at even? So you are saying that you think Machida would win then. Because you’d be able to just bet Fedor to win at the same exact line…which doesn’t match up with everything you’ve said to this point.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m saying he’s the ONLY one I would bet on to win if I was Zuffa.
In actuality, I wouldn’t bet on any of them against Fedor.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s what I gathered too. But the UFC controls the N.A. rights….
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes however if they were a middleweight it wouldnt be such a problem.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What if Anderson loses to Forrest?
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even better
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In my opinion it’s all contingent on this and his performance… Otherwise Ill be back picking your brains again :)
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we're going to crazy town
Why not let Forrest fight if he beats Spider.
His drawing power is pretty much unstoppable. He’s big enough that size won’t be a factor. He always seems to bring it and pull it out when no one expects him too.
by Phildo on Aug 4, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fedor is a horrible matchup for Forrest
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone is a horrible match up for Forrest. I can never see how he wins when I try to predict his fights. Yet somehow he does.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 4, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What exactly does “This whole Fedor mess goes away” imply?
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fedor loses, the UFC shows that every week for a year, and everyday leading up to a Strikeforce fight. His superhuman aspect goes away and he is beatable. Other organizations just banked their company on a guy that does in fact lose.
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL…
Yeah, good thing that shit is never happening.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 4, 2009 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha, I’m just saying. It would be funny to see what the UFC would do with that footage if it did happen..
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can you ....
Give what the upsides are to Zuffa? I just dont see any fighter they have outside of Lesnar that would be a sound bet from a betting standpoint, and even he would be a slight dog.
by dhny11 on Aug 4, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All you need is 50/50…. And without a US audience…. what does it matter.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So would you stick with Anderson or risk Machida’s marketability?
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stick with Anderson. You risk Machida’s invincibility. Would this be an official bout? The question I ask is then it could blemish each of their records…
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t risk Machida’s marketability. He has a long career in the UFC and potential match-ups with 5 or 6 legit contenders.
Anderson Silva is out of contenders, doesn’t speak English, can’t draw as a fighter, and is 2 (instead of 1) weight class below.
Not to mention his striking will almost certainly cut Fedor badly. On the ground Fedor could try and ground and pound him, but Silva seems to always find a way to escape.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus, Fedor tried to avoid fighting Vitor because of the speed factor. He has always used his speed to his advantage. Can’t against Silva.
Machida is fast, but not as fast as Silva.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The entire blood shed could end with one stroke of the opposing fighters limb…
So now weigh the risk of Machida’s marketability and having a better chance of the W?
please give me your input on this.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Machida is a win over Shogun and a win over Rampage away from being the new Fedor. Anderson is not undefeated, and he has some embarrassing losses on his record. Machida might have a better chance of beating Fedor, but he also has way more promotional upside.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Either way, Zuffa would be stupid to take the bet. No matter how hard they tried to hide the fight, word would leak out. The story of a “secret” fight could blow up and become a huge deal.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is something to be said for this.
It would almost bring the legend of Fedor to life.
“Oh, he beat a UFC Champion in an underground fight”. Sometimes it’s better not to give attention to something.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The worse case scenario for Zuffa is orders of magnitude worse than the benefits of the best case scenario.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
people will know as much as they know about the ultimate fighter matches.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Breaking this might be worth more than the lawsuit to some people.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 4, 2009 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
By saying that, it seems like M1 would not have any international rights, or the rights are delayed for a period of time? That’s the big difference with this and the ultimate fighter, it could be displayed internationally and then spread from there.
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A good thought is for Zuffa to not only have North American rights to this, but also digital/Internet rights, so someone can put the fight on an international server that everyone can link to on the internet.
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no they would have the international rights… but their could always be “production problems” during filming.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And no lawsuit can bring back film footage that isn’t there. And Zuffa can handle a fine.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Same thing as with a girl who makes a porn video with her boyfriend. If it’s on tape (which it will be just in case the UFC fighter wins), it will get out to the public. There is always somebody who will leak it.
Plus, if it is an official fight, it would have to be documented right?
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The leak doesn't matter...
compared to it being a hyped, broadcasted event. The hardcores would just have video of something they already knew about. It’s the mass public who wouldn’t know that matters.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You think there is no chance that the mainstream media picks up on this story? It would be like a real world version of blood sport. The lack of a video would only make people’s imaginations run wild.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the media couldn't run the video...
and I don’t know that Joe Sportsfan would care enough to do the leg work to find it.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but your point is very sound.
This makes it more beneficial for a Middleweight to be fighting a HW than a LHW – incase of the loss.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know. It’s a toss up between Machida and Silva. Tough to say.
We are at the mercy of Brazil…..
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The benefits are modest at best. Fedor is going to lose eventually, and it might be to Brett Rogers or Overeem. Even if Fedor goes to StrikeForce and looks impressive, they could still fail. The risks, even if they are remote, could be disastrous. The UFC could end up lending their credibility and their brand equity to Fedor. Dana could be facing question after question about the “secret fight” in every interview he does. Maybe Joss Gross writes a cover story on it for sports illustrated. Far fetched? You bet, but it’s like betting your life against $10,000. It’s not worth it, even if the odd of losing are 100,000 to 1.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd.
This is a resoundingly bad idea in my mind.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito Ortiz on Vitor Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Aug 5, 2009 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly… the hardcores would know. It would just be underground content really.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, those are exhibitions which aren’t disclosed by the athletic commissions. If these fights are for keeps, they would have to be made known right away (as far as I know the regulations).
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 5, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really think people are underestimating how much coverage this would get. I, for one, would link this shit to Deadspin as soon as it became public. Deadspin would absolutely love reporting about a backroom fight between two of the best fighters on the planet. It’s a story that reports itself.
Just imagine if it makes SportsCenters blog roll thingy.
Twitter: @Mike_Fagan_13
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Aug 5, 2009 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree there will be leakage but mostly on the forums… nothing more than any affliction car which they actually promoted would do.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Erin Andrews tape was taken off every major website. It was still easy to find.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s the thing. I don’t think Machida has a better chance. It’s impossible to say how his style would go up against Fedor’s. Fedor has his own unique style as well. How they match-up is tough to say.
With Silva, there is always the risk of him being g’n’ped by Fedor. But it’s a very simple thing of speed vs. not so much speed. Fedor does not have a great wrestling takedown. He typically uses his hips to shift his weight and get his larger opponents off balance. He did this in Pride for years.
This likely won’t work against Silva, who can use his speed to stay on the outside and hit him with strikes.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with Rome...
go big or go home. Go with Machida
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Aug 4, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
God that would be sweet
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Word.
How bad can a loss to Fedor look on your record? Use your best shot if your playing hardball.
by dhny11 on Aug 4, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since
we are looking at hypotheticals, lets say anderson wins, fights twice more in the ufc, goes and gets tooled by RJJ in boxing, while Fedor smashes everybody SF puts in front of him, what does that leave Zuffa looking at then?
by dhny11 on Aug 4, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still with a blemish on Fedor’s record. And the ability to call Lesnar the #1 Heavyweight without basically anybody questioning it.
Anybody who questions it will get: “Fedor lost to a Middleweight. Would Lesnar ever lose to a Middleweight?”
End of discussion.
And the linear HW belt would be out of the Heavyweight Division and out of MMA. Which means it would revert back to Lesnar or whoever the UFC Champion was.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fedor isnt a true HW imo, he could cut to lh easily I would think, and possibly make MW. While Lesnar could fight at super heavy, but hey the marketing machine would make it seem that way I suppose.
by dhny11 on Aug 4, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could the UFC try and tie this into a contract extension with Silva since he seems so adamant about leaving? Forget about RJJ, you get a shitload of money, AND get to fight Fedor.
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well here is my take.
WIthout knowing what Zuffa is trying to do exactly its hard to give a good opinion.
Anderson V Fedor in a 5 rounder is an advantage to Fedor. If its in a ring even more so, as anderson isnt as used to working his way out of a corner.
If Anderson loses your correct, it makes do difference he is supposed to lose in most ppls minds, if he wins Zuffa has a collective melt down from happiness.
Andersons best shot is on the feet.
Fedor does not lay and pray, the only praying doing on is what Anderson is doing everytime he eats a fist.
Machida would probably be the hardest fight outside of Lesnar that I can thing of off hand.
Cain IMO would be a horrible gamble.
Anderson IMO while not a horrible gamble is not a good one from a betting standpoint. You probably wouldnt be laying money on him in a regular fight, he gets taken down to much, and if Fedor takes you down your in for a long night, or a very short one.
by dhny11 on Aug 4, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It may also be worth noting it’s been quite a while since Fedor went for a takedown.
by Michael Rome on Aug 4, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chuck Liddell 5 years ago…
by Screwface on Aug 4, 2009 10:25 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
see BJ vs Machida
I don’t know if this is a good indicator. The Machida who fought BJ was raw and inexperienced. I am sure the current Machida is a far better fighter.
by cyph on Aug 4, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Machida all day long.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito Ortiz on Vitor Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Aug 4, 2009 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t put it past him – however, if I had to pick a ringer outside of the three that you mentioned, I think I’d pick Dos Santos.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 4, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks to all of you awesome guys who have participated in this discussion. VERY bright people here as evidenced in this dialogue… Many great points any top consultant and analyst would be envious of.
Bloody Elbow is the pound for pound best in MMA IQ.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Many great points any top consultant and analyst would be envious of.
Glad we made you proud. :)
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t worry, we’ll send you an hour bill. And the best thing, is that with the timestamps, it’ll be tough to knock down any of that time. No need to fill out notepads about what you are doing every 5 minutes for someone else to go through and counter.
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s often said the devoted fans are smarter then the journalists who cover this sport. It’s very true.
Fedor vs. Machida…. coming to a gym near YOU!!!
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, thanks for coming and sharing information and bouncing thoughts around, it’s greatly appreciated.
by MMAWrestling on Aug 4, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As always, you’re welcome to appropriate my brilliance for free :-D
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 5, 2009 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jon Jones is another potential one, but he might be too inexperienced at this point.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 5, 2009 2:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As for my reasoning on this:
1. Inexperience means he won’t feel the pressure.
2. Light Heavyweight, not Heavyweight.
3. Faster Speed
4. Unorthodox fighter who has both striking and grappling.
5. Great prospect, but nobody knows who he is.
You could make or break his career, but there are always casualties of war.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 5, 2009 2:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll throw my opinion in here. Unfortunately I’ll be echoing most everyone’s thoughts. If I’m Zuffa, I’m not throwing in any heavyweight (excluding Couture, Lesnar, and Carwin per your rules) b/c I don’t think any of them could beat Fedor. I wanna atleast try to win, so my only two options are the ones listed before I commented, Anderson Silva or Lyoto Machida. Out of those 2 guys, I feel Lyoto has the best chance of defeating Fedor, but I’m not picking him b/c he’s turning into a draw. His Karate style is appealing to all those Joe McDojo kids out there, plus he’s half Japanese and could possibly help bring me into the Asian market. This leaves Anderson Silva. He has a shot at beating Fedor as he has good size and superior striking and footwork. It’s a win-win. If Anderson wins, a middleweight beats the best heavyweight in the world. If he loses, Anderson is a middleweight, is disinterested in fighting anyone but RJJ anyways, and isn’t a draw.
by filipinomix2oo0 on Aug 5, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m late for this, but I’ll go ahead and add my analysis:
Anderson Silva is the right bet, if the UFC decides they want to do this, though I’m not at all sure if they should. He’s a highly skilled, technical striker, which Arlovski showed Fedor can be hit by. He’s a junk draw and his only marketable fight coming up is with Hendo, so the UFC can readily push that back to early spring. He’s old, he wants to leave to box, and he’s two weight classes lighter than Fedor, reducing the boost to Fedor if Fedor wins (which will get out, and probably get widely publicized, considering the entertaining nature of such underground shenanigans).
If this is about taking the opportunity to minimize the cash lost by getting into a war, Anderson is also the least costly. LHW is filled with marketable matchups for Machida until the end of time; if he fights Fedor, you push back his next PPV fight, losing out on that money and on the interest received by the boost in marketability he would receive. Say a 200,000 PPV loss over the course of Machida’s career, at $23 per PPV, gives a $4,600,000 loss. Not an enormous loss considering the impact of getting into a war with Strikeforce, but still worth considering.
None of the HWs are worth considering, as the only ones with chances of winning comparable to Anderson’s, are marketable fights for Lesnar; losing those fights would be much bigger costs to the UFC.
I’m unconvinced this is the right move anyway. The UFC is in the superior position, they shouldn’t take any sort of gamble, even if it costs them much more to take the bleeding option. What if Fedor wins the underground match, and it spins into a media frenzy? Any potential for the war to be won by the boxing-style promoters must be minimized. In the long run the bleeding option may be necessary anyway. What happens if Cain Velasquez becomes a former champion, and leaves in favor of a bigger payday? The only way to really avoid that is to boost payouts such that nobody could imagine ever making a profit by stealing top fighters, and that means making margins reasonable. Bleeding Strikeforce now by boosting payouts permanently kills the boxing promotional style in MMA.
by Foxskinrug on Aug 5, 2009 3:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suppose I should clarify my line of thoughts in the last paragraph: if Cain Velasquez wins the title, he would be somewhat trapped by the Champions clause. But if he then loses the title, but remains a superstar fighter, he just has to wait out his contract, Arlovski style. Arlovski was willing to do it for a big payout, why not somebody else? The UFC spreads the wealth between its fighters, which benefits low-end fighters, while hurting high-end fighters. If payouts across the board are low enough, there will always be some boxing promoter interested in stealing the superstars and running a show. Such a show might even be a potential success in the future, if mainstream MMA media catches up to boxing levels.
Eventually, payouts as a percentage of revenue will have to rise. Do it now and strangle the market.
by Foxskinrug on Aug 5, 2009 3:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Randy Couture: Battle Has Begun Between UFC and Strikeforce:
“The back-and-forth is starting now between the UFC and Strikeforce,” Couture said Tuesday. “There were a lot of competitors out there for the UFC, and Strikeforce is the last one standing. So it was only a matter of time before the adversarial relationship started between them, I think, with the Affliction stuff and those contracts being up in the air and both organizations trying to sign those fighters.”

by Nick Thomas on Aug 4, 2009 8:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He Also Said This...
Some MMA observers have suggested that Fedor is ducking tough opponents by refusing to fight in the UFC, which has most of the world’s top heavyweights under contract. But Couture said he thinks Fedor will have some big fights in Strikeforce.
“There are a lot of interesting fights there, like Alistair Overeem and Brett Rogers,” Couture said. “Those are some big, strong heavyweights and it’ll be interesting to see how Fedor looks against those guys.”
Still, Couture said that as long as Fedor is generally recognized as the heavyweight champion of MMA, he’ll hope to step into the cage with him.
“I think most people consider him the best heavyweight in the world,” Couture said. “The guy is very impressive, with what he did to Tim Sylvia and Andrei Arlovski, and then going back to Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira and all the other people he’s defeated. He wins his fights in pretty devastating fashion most of the time. Most people consider him the best heavyweight, and as a fighter, those are the people you want to fight. You want to fight the best guy.”
by MMASuPreMaCy on Aug 4, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that’s why when you hear a guy like randy talk,who at the age of 45 still wants to fight the BEST fighters in the world,not “well he’s very good and it’ll be interesting”.
that’s why it’s so sad that fedor isn’t pushing himself to fight the likes of a lesnar or a couture orfrank mir or the winner of cai/carwin.maybe even a machida or croc-cop for old times sakes.
i can’t fathom why athletes wouldn’t INSIST on fighting the best.
by justizzer on Aug 4, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's very sad that Fedor didn't come to the UFC to fight Randy
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
by subo on Aug 4, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
I wouldn’t doubt it if Dana didn’t give a fuck. He did his best to sign Fedor and Fedor told the fans to f off. I don’t think Dana would hold that against Coker, Dana wasn’t going to sign Fedor and that meant someone else had to.
Dana probably thinks Coker is stupid for making the deal, but I doubt he’ll be out to crush him.
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 8:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Zuffa needs an enemy. Affliction is done, so the new enemy is Strikeforce.
Dana can also hold a grudge until the extinction of the cockroach.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dana’s grudge would be against Fedor and M1, not Coker. Coker isn’t trying to dethrone UFC or calling them out, that’s typically when brings out the Baldfathers wrath.
Dana likes Strikeforce and wants it to exist for the fighters he doesn’t have room to sign. I don’t see that changing because of Fedor, I don’t think Dana really care about Fedor.
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strikeforce will be guilty by association…. they’re gonna get hurt by this whole situation because they’ve aligned themselves w/ M-1.
No further comments on Bruce Wayne.
by Gunslinger20 on Aug 4, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, I don’t think so. From what I understand about Dana, which granted isn’t like I have some great insight, he thinks M1 is going to sink what they touch all on their own.
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has to crush him. If he doesn’t, and Strikeforce gains momentum, it will be harder for the UFC to beat them in the future.
They have to go after them when they are the weakest, which is now.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think that holds up under scrutiny. If that was the case Dana could have been crushing them for a while now. He likes Coker and the Strikeforce product.
Look, Dana HATES Frank Glamrock WAY WAY more than Fedor and hyping Frank as some legendary great that Zuffa was ducking didn’t make Dana smash them.
Why would this?
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scott Coker on Showtime was no threat to the UFC.
Scott Coker on CBS and PPV goes directly at UFC’s revenue stream. By signing Fedor, Strikeforce plays to do CBS and PPV.
This makes them a direct threat. I love it when people say stuff about like and disliking somebody. This is business. You stab your neighbor in the heart if he tries to reduce your profits. Even if he’s a nice guy.
And that is something Fertitta will make sure happens…. He knows how to run a business properly.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok I hear what you’re saying, but consider this… Dana had nothing bad to say about Strikeforce after the CBS deal. In fact, he had nothing but praise for them. That’s with full knowledge of their intent of being on network TV and planning to do PPV. That would make them to you argument, as I understand it, a “direct threat”.
Dana apparently didn’t see it like that. I believe Dana feels like the Fedor deal Strikeforce made will hurt them more than help them.
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coker knows the war is on… he’s just playing dumb.
by mmalogic on Aug 4, 2009 8:43 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
You’re both right. People need to stop talking things people say at face value.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course, I said the same thing about M-1’s insistence on co-promotion, so it’s not like my credibility is riding high right now.
by Jahbulon on Aug 4, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
rec’d for admitting you have no credibility…
:-)
by Reaser16 on Aug 4, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coker can play naive but before he knows it.......

"He built his whole reputation (as a) waffle house chef. They've been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes." - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Deo Wade on Aug 4, 2009 8:56 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
Uh-oh
Looks like someone explained the concept of counter-programming to Coker.
RIP Strikeforce
by Paradoxx on Aug 4, 2009 9:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mark my words, the X-factor will be Electronic Arts. As long as Strikeforce can keep them on their side, they’re a serious force to be reckoned with. A bigger company, with a bigger fanbase than the UFC who’s infamous for playing hardball with other game developers…
Scott Coker may be naive, but he has the best lieutenant he could ask for.
by gzl5000 on Aug 4, 2009 9:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have a strange feeling EA saving the day is going to be the next ridiculous reason people use now that they can’t say “trump is so rich and good at business, Affliction will never die!”
EA’s sports games that are great are great because they have exclusive licenses with the major leagues. They have trouble competing when they are on even footing with people (2K sports football games rocked), I see no reason to see why they are going to do any damage when they are at the disadvantage they usually put their competitors at.
by Phildo on Aug 4, 2009 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
2k Sports
Killing that franchise is why I don’t play EQ games.
by VegasBatman on Aug 4, 2009 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s the other ironic thing to this whole nonsense argument.
EA, a company that has gotten most of it’s success by using the same “evil” techniques that Zuffa uses all the time (exclusive contracts, buying up companies, going in for the kill), is going to somehow lead the charge against the evil empire.
by Phildo on Aug 4, 2009 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would add Pro Evolution Soccer vs. EA’s FIFA to that argument. Well put.
Kuwabara Kuwabara
by J. B. Maddox on Aug 4, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
definitely needs to be added…
Pro Evolution has the gameplay, FIFA has the license, teams, players, sponsors and graphics…
by Reaser16 on Aug 4, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strikeforce in Japan
One thing no one has talked about with this potential Dream/Strikeforce partnership, is the possibility of a Strikeforce show in Japan. Even maybe a co-promoted event. Dana recently said that “We are coming to Japan nothing can stop us.” (something like that)
Imagine if Strikeforce does a show in Japan before the UFC, that could be something that would really piss Dana off.
by nbs on Aug 4, 2009 9:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Co-promotions like that never work.
Strikeforce has to keep Showtime happy. DREAM has to keep TBS happy. Each is a very different market. It is highly unlikely that any super fights will happen from this.
And DREAM has no real Heavyweights, Light Heavyweights, or Middleweights to make a dent in Strikeforce. The biggest two are Overeem & Mousasi, but Strikeforce already planned on having them here.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rumors of Strikeforce's demise are greatly exaggerated
I think it’s harder to crush a conservative and growing SF than ppl might realize. This isn’t like buying a mac or PC. Consumers can easily have both products particularly if they remain free. The cheif determinent of SF success will be the effectiveness of their marketing and other prmotion related decisions they make. Let’s not forget that this is the fastest growing sport. The more new fans the UFC generates the more fans Strikeforce will have. If you like MMA you like Strikeforce. I agree that it is very unlikely that they can hold a sucessfull PPV anytime in the foreseable future but there’s no reasin whay they cant draw a large TV audience. I dont know shit about gaming but gaming but this is a case where the bull of the consumers will probably only choose 1 of the 2 available products. Not boding well for EA.
I also think Machida can go the distance with Fedor and possibly get the W.
As previously noted Anderson does get taken down too often to make hima viable pick.
by naturalist on Aug 4, 2009 9:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What happens when every year they build up new potential stars, and the UFC offers them double what Strikeforce does?
Coker has two options. Pay more for the stars and risk financial peril. Or don’t pay for them, and start from scratch every year. Not to mention look like a complete minor league for the UFC.
The UFC has a bigger bank roll. This is not something he can win if Dana White makes it tough on him.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They can make it difficult...
gawd only knows why they haven’t picked up Jake Shileds after all this time. However, the UFC will always cut fighters and there will always be up and comers from local circuits. I’ve wondered why the dont do twice as many Fight Nights. Maybe they will get more aggressive with the number of broadcasts that they do. But, that’s all just fan speculation at this point. And it definetly doesn’t change the fact that SF will be puttting on some damn good shows for some time to come.
by naturalist on Aug 4, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jake Shields wanted to go to the UFC, but when Strikeforce purchased EliteXC’s assets, they made it difficult for him. He still has 2 more fights on the deal I think. It is highly unlikely he will stick around once he is done with those two fights.
And if you notice, the UFC not only hasn’t cut anybody lately, they are signing on fighters every week. So many in fact that they have 13 fights for UFC 103. That’s not be coincidence.
Shields, Diaz, Le, and a few others are the winners here. They will likely get big money offers.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just have a hard time believing that there will be a shortage of TV worthy talent in the future. It seems to me the talent pool is growing every year. The skills that we thought were excellent a few years ago are are above average at best now.
Bottom line, I think the Frititas realize that as long as they can squash anyone’s attempt at a successfull PPV they dont really have any competition…not any competition that matters.
by naturalist on Aug 4, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“I dont know shit about gaming but this is a case where the bulk of the consumers will probably only choose 1 of the 2 available products”
by naturalist on Aug 4, 2009 9:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Underestimating Viacom/ Co-promotion angle
I think a lot of people are underestimating the interest CBS has in and how much influence they’ve had in the decisions. CBS is salivating at the prospects of putting MMA on the air. They saw what it did with Kimbo and they see the money the UFC is making and they want in. So they’re pushing Strikeforce to start competing. Now it’s true the UFC has an advantage over Strikeforce in every area except one, they don’t have Viacom. If they really believe that Strikeforce has the potential to be even half what the UFC is, I don’t think they would have a problem dumping $100 million down the drain to make it happen. The UFC? Lot of money, but not the deep pockets a major entertainment company has.
Of course if things go to far south they also have little problem pulling the plug. You won’t see them hanging on forever, which may explain why the UFC is coming out with all guns blazing – kill them now.
And MMAlogic. I tend to agree with the logic behind a lot of your pronouncements, but concerning Fedor and M-1 reasons for rejecting the UFC offer, I believe you missed the most obvious one – they are looking to co-promote to eventual get into promoting Fedor’s fights themselves. A la Oscar De La Haya. If they can make Fedor somewhat of a draw and get some experience as promoters with Strikeforce, I’m betting on a Couture-Fedor fight in late 2010 (as long as he wins the last two fights on his contract), with both of them getting 10mil +. After that, UFC and Strikeforce and Dream won’t matter. The floodgates will be open, every major fighter will be looking to promote their own fights (just like boxing)
by nottheface on Aug 4, 2009 9:58 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
CBS is going to dumb $100 Million into Strikeforce? You have to be kidding.
They wouldn’t dump $100 Million into their highest rated show on TV during the week. No way they will do so for a MMA event that will likely only be on their channel 4 times a year.
Not to mention they have earnings to hit every quarter. The UFC doesn’t.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I should have probably stated that a little clearer. I said that if CBS really believed “Strikeforce has the potential to be even half what the UFC is, I don’t think they would have a problem dumping $100 million down the drain to make it happen.” I didn’t mean they would throw $100 million away, I meant that IF they saw they could make 1/2 the business the UFC was doing they would put $100 million in. I stand by that. But like I also said, as soon as it looks like it’s going south they are pulling out. Badly phrased – get why you thought I was talking out of my ass.
And as for the second part -that is my guess as to why M-1 and Fedor are acting this way – they want to eventually promote his fights themselves. Is it going to happen? Depends on everything going their way with Strikeforce and CBS. And will fighters like Couture and Lesnar jump on board? Hey, if they could sell 1.6 million PPV – that would be $50 million split between the two. Sound too much – check out what Manny, De La Hoy, and Mayweather are getting on there fights. With numbers like that, fighters will jump to promoters that get them the huge paydays. It’s boxing v2.0
by nottheface on Aug 5, 2009 3:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As for every fighter going out on his own….
1. Brock Lesnar just wants to fight. He is not the type to make his own promotion.
2. Tito Ortiz is basically signed for life.
3. GSP is friendly with Dana White and wouldn’t care to even try.
4. Rampage is like Lesnar, not the type to do so.
Most fighters don’t want to make headwaves. It’s not their nature. They just want to fight.
And Fedor hasn’t been a draw, and never will be.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 4, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Coker
Hope in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up quicker.
I don’t think they’re actually going to let him kill me... And if he does kills me, book sales will really go up. Boom…win-win, bitch.- Forrest Griffin on Anderson Silva
by ufc4 on Aug 4, 2009 10:08 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Lamb of God rules.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dear McDonald's;
Oh please don’t crush me with all your might.
Sincerely,
Burger King
by Skoobs on Aug 4, 2009 10:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not really a great comparison considering Burger King and McDonald’s aren’t vying for each other’s recipes or trying to contract a third party’s recipe to sell in their restaurants.
by Screwface on Aug 4, 2009 10:51 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
That analogy would make sense if they were selling a premium product and there were a limited number of burger pattys in the world.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
by Ubernoober on Aug 4, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Analogy fail.
I STILL poop rainbows.
by Blackout612 on Aug 5, 2009 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Rec’d.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Aug 5, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You cant have both BK and MC D for your meal. You can DVR SF AND watch UFC for your entertianment. Can the UFC so greatly diminish SF’s product so that it’s not worth watching? Coker, Fedor, and Jacare dont think so.
by naturalist on Aug 4, 2009 11:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Looks like Coker really isn’t as smart as everyone thougth he was, he’s fucked that sad part of is he’s the only one who doesn’t seem to know it.
by Raker on Aug 5, 2009 12:40 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
While it seems that most are convinced that this UFC vs Strikeforce war has started, I personally have to take Coker’s stance in this. My reasoning is that I feel that the UFC needs Strikeforce at this point in MMA. It is obvious that the UFC cannot sign EVERYONE, so many fighters will need a place to fight and Strikeforce is that place. Also, Strikeforce can be an indirect farm league to the UFC. Also, unlike Strikeforce, Affliction and BoDog had horrible business models for their respective promotions. While Strikeforce is an upcoming promotion, it really comes off like Total Nonstop Action (TNA) to WWE where WWE is just so big that they really don’t care too much about TNA, and Strikeforce has not called out the UFC directly like other promotions have.
by chrisbboy82 on Aug 5, 2009 1:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I didn't read all of the responses..but
Anderson SIlva is who you want fighting Fedor provided he beats Griffin this weekend…he has length, quickness, KO power, devastating clinch, a great chin, has ‘ring’ experience if it has to take place in a ring, and avoids damage well.
If he lost…then as mentioned he’s not a big draw PPV wise…obviously Zuffa doesn’t mind him taking an L since they are matching him up against Griffin…who has a decent shot at grinding out a decision this weekend. It’s clear that Silva will be exiting MMA soon…he’s talked about it enough. In regards to Machida….no sense in risking him in such a fight when he’s the champion of your deepest division…and undefeated….AND becoming a player PPV wise.
IF Fedor lost to a Zuffa fighter, they want it to be decisive/devastating….Silva has the potential to do that. Whereas if Machida were to beat Fedor it would more than likely be a decision since he may not have the power to stop Fedor.
http://www.mmaforreal.com
Follow Me On Twitter@MMA4Real
by Kelvin Hunt on Aug 5, 2009 8:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






![Dana White says "Karo Parisyan will not be fighting" at UFC 106.
[UPDATE] by Dana White - "Pulled out of the fight the day before weigh ins again with a laundry list of excuses!!! Let the press ask karo why! Let him explain."
[UPDATE] by Josh Gross - "Karo Parisyan via text confirmed he won’t be fighting Saturday. He declined to answer any questions."
[UPDATE] by Dana White - "Dustin will be paid his full purse to show and win. Its not his fault."
HT: twitter.com/danawhite
UFC 106: Ortiz vs. Griffin 2 coverage](http://cdn0.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/86739/2ufvnnc_small.jpg)













