4 Reasons Why Female MMA Will NEVER Be Popular
I kind of chuckle at some fans who really think that female MMA can be a viable option for a MMA promoter. It might be able to increase ratings here or there, but it is not the type competition to give them strong, consistent ratings. Female fighters will likely have a small, minimal place in fighting. Here are the 4 Reasons why:
1. WHERE'S THE TALENT COMING FROM? Each established female sport in America has a strong feeder system. The WNBA has a strong women's college program to draw from. Females start from a very early age playing the game. Tennis & Golf both have larger college programs. Primarily a "wealthy" persons sport, it isn't uncommon for advanced athletes to get expensive coaching from an early age in order to advance their careers. Even men's MMA pulls from wrestling, BJJ, Muay Thai, Kickboxing, Boxing, etc. Most of the advanced wrestlers today in the UFC started competing before the age of 10. Simply put, each sport has an strong foundation to draw talent from. THIS DOES NOT EXIST FOR FEMALE FIGHTERS. Women's wrestling is almost non-existent. Many females who do BJJ are not likely to make the transition over. And there are no major female boxers or a female K-1 division. Yes, female MMA will draw from these sports, but there just isn't enough of them happening in order to get a strong enough pool of talent.
2. SHOW ME THE MONEY!!! Despite being called a success, the Gina Carano vs. Chris "Cyborg" Title Fight drew a gate of less then $1 Million. It is highly unlikely that an event headlined by females can become a strong PPV attraction or get a huge gate. Even if Gina Carano won, there is no way her name could get people to purchase a $45 PPV, or spend $200 on a ticket. More proof of this is the WNBA. Despite having the full backing of a billion dollar industry like the NBA, they have a hard time bringing in money. Salary Caps for each team are set at $900,000. That's for the ENTIRE TEAM. Outside of Tennis & Golf (which have a very wealthy fanbase), no female sports stars have been able to command high ticket prices for their events. I don't see any female MMA fighter changing this.
3. SHORTER CAREERS!!!! We often are amazed at guys like Randy Couture or Bernard Hopkins can compete well into their 40's. This is much less common for female athletes. Their careers are often shorter for a few reasons. First, their hormones can start to change which can make it harder to be a competitive athlete later in life. Secondly, they do have weaker knee ligaments which can cause more injuries. Lastly, a very simple two words: FAMILY & BABY! Athletes like Joy Fawcett (Soccer) and Dara Torres (Swimming) can have children and still compete in their respective sports. Heck, Torres had a baby 15 months prior to winning the 2007 Nationals. In MMA, having a baby is without question a career ender. With a shorter career length, there is a shorter window of opportunity for a promoter to not only make a woman into a champion, but a likely shorter time span of being on top.
4. IF IT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN!!! Looking at the overall history of sports in America, it is easily dominated by male athletes. Female athletes as a whole are a side note. Football is 99.9% men. Baseball has softball, which gets little to no attention. The NBA has the WNBA, which has never been successful. If females could be sold to the general public, don't you think somebody would have figured it out for one of these sports already? As i said before, the only two sports in which female athletes have done solid business are in Tennis and Golf. And both have more of a "Country Club" fan then they do anything else. To further prove my point, here is a list of other popular female athletes and the sports they were supposed to propel into the mainstream:
- Sheryl Swoopes & The WNBA- Swoopes, an Olympic Gold Medalist. Branded as "The Michael Jordan"of the WNBA. The 1st Overall pick for the league. She could not make the WNBA popular. As it stands today, the league continues to suffer from financial problems, low TV ratings, and a lack of fanfare.
- Christy Martin & Women's Boxing- Martin was given the push of a lifetime as she was often promoted on the undercard of Mike Tyson events. Not the current Mike Tyson of today, but the wrecking machine Tyson back in his prime. She even appeared on the cover of Sports illustrated, making some believe women's boxing would finally become popular. Despite all of this, women's boxing could not make a dent to the public.
- Laila Ali & Women's Boxing- The daughter of the most famous boxer alive today, the great Muhammad Ali. Laila, a very gifted boxer herself, could not make women's boxing popular. It would be like a female "Gracie" being in MMA. She now has a child and is retired from the sport.
- Mia Hamm & Women's Soccer- And finally there is Mia Hamm. A great soccer player who lead the United States to a Gold Medal in the Olympics. The Summer of Mia got the sport of Female Soccer so much attention. Mia Hamm was in multiple commercials, and the sport looked to be taking off. Not to mention little girls around the nation were looking up to these ladies as roll model. The onslaught of media attention even allowed for the formation of the WUSA, the first female soccer league. Despite all of their popularity, the league (which included many of Mia's well known teammates from the Olympics) failed miserably.
If Hamm, Swoopes, Martin, & Ali couldn't make their sports popular to the American public.... I don't see how Gina Carano or Chris "Cyborg" can do it. The female MMA fights will provide for some added discussion amongst the more devoted fans. And every once in a while get more mainstream attention. Female MMA having any real potential for a MMA Organization is HIGHLY improbable. And that is putting it nicely.
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
74 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It would be like a female “Gracie” being in MMA.
Kyra Gracie is a multiple time world champion in BJJ. If I’m not mistaken she’s starting to take the leap to MMA. It won’t change the world, but I’m just noting that this is a paralell to Ali.
I agree with you for the most part. There could however be a place for womens MMA due to the format of presentation. There are often upwards of 10 fights per card. Putting 1-2 womens fights on the cards alongside the men will help it out. This can’t be done with football and baseball, with one game taking upwards of 3 hours.
An American all-Female MMA org. comes along it could be a big deathblow to the sport.
This is really horrible, but it's true.
If women’s MMA was a bunch of Cyborg Santos look-alikes, I would never, ever watch it.
by P4P is a stupid concept on Aug 16, 2009 9:46 PM EDT reply actions
Even if all their fights looked like fights you’d see in WEC? Even if there were female versions of Anderson Silva, Jose Aldo, Clay Guida, and Demian Maia?
I’d probably watch, but the casual fan probably wouldn’t. The female versions of Andreson Silva, Jose Aldo, Clay Guida and Demian Maia would make for some ugly looking women.
by filipinomix2oo0 on Aug 17, 2009 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 17, 2009 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Rec’d for a well written fanpost, that I hope people who disagree will be just as well written and researched as this with their responses.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Aug 16, 2009 9:53 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I find the rush by so many commentors to strenuously insist that women’s MMA is a guaranteed failure… interesting. What exactly is your personal investment in making sure everybody knows that female fighters will never be as popular?
There’s a lot of pessimism in the MMA hardcore fanbase. That’s because if something fails, people like being able to say that they were right about it having no chance.
However, I suspect that if Zuffa got on board, and Dana White came out publicly in favor of women’s MMA, the tunes of many on these boards would change. It would probably sound something like, “I know I said that Women’s MMA would never catch on, but if Dana White believes it can, then there must be something to it.”
Are you really going to go to the Dana White nuthugger strawman? Ignore tons of relevant points and a blatantly obvious cultural stigma against women fighting and just write it off to “it’s because Dana White says it won’t work”? Seriously?
by who me on Aug 17, 2009 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
I find it interesting how many people think that it will go somewhere without looking unbiasedly at the facts. Lets face it no matter whether you like it or not or want it to succeed or not the facts as they stand are still there and they point to women’s MMA having huge hurdles to overcome to gain any acceptance by the casual fan at all.
Get over it.
All the media and websites were pleased with where women’s MMA is at right now and where its going in Strikeforce.
I don't think that many MMA fans want to see Women's MMA as a standalone product
I think that it is fine being integrated with Mens’ MMA. It will always have a spot because of the simple reason that it is different and something that Zuffa doesn’t utilize. At the very least, Womens MMA helps Strikeforce because it is something that helps them differentiate themselves from the UFC. It is already becoming the norm in Strikeforce to have at least one Womens bout on their events.
As far as Gina vs Cyborg is concerned, many MMA fans are of the opinion that a rematch would be as big or bigger than their first fight.
It doesn’t take a lot of prognosticating ability to predict that female MMA won’t be as successful as the male version. I think most who care already acknowledge that. The female talent pool is constricted in much the same way as it is for men. More would-be professional athletes choose the path of stick and ball sports. There’s more infrastructure in schools and the like. Hell, amateur wrestling at all is nonexistent where I’m from.
Female MMA probably isn’t viable as a stand alone product. But when mixed with the more established male matches, I think there’s some utility there for promoters. Pushing forth conjecture as established fact doesn’t change the reality that female MMA will need to be tried in different variations before you can deem the entire sport a failure. Popularity isn’t a defined value.
by Cannon Jacques on Aug 16, 2009 10:03 PM EDT reply actions
Even men’s MMA pulls from wrestling, BJJ, Muay Thai, Kickboxing, Boxing, etc. Most of the advanced wrestlers today in the UFC started competing before the age of 10. Simply put, each sport has an strong foundation to draw talent from. THIS DOES NOT EXIST FOR FEMALE FIGHTERS. Women’s wrestling is almost non-existent. Many females who do BJJ are not likely to make the transition over. And there are no major female boxers or a female K-1 division. Yes, female MMA will draw from these sports, but there just isn’t enough of them happening in order to get a strong enough pool of talent.
Like you said, there are female wrestlers, BJJ practicioners, Thai boxers, kickboxers, and boxers. Since there are currently less spots on cards for women fighters to compete for, the talent pool that they will be drawing from need not be as large as the one for male fighters. Also, they just made women’s boxing an Olympic event for 2012 at 112, 132, and 165. That means that there will be a feeder system, as well as pool of world-class strikers looking to continue their athletic endeavors after concluding their amateur careers. It also means that cultural norms surrounding women punching each other in the face will continue to evolve.
Despite being called a success, the Gina Carano vs. Chris “Cyborg” Title Fight drew a gate of less then $1 Million. It is highly unlikely that an event headlined by females can become a strong PPV attraction or get a huge gate. Even if Gina Carano won, there is no way her name could get people to purchase a $45 PPV, or spend $200 on a ticket.
You know what else didn’t draw a million-dollar gate? Urijah Faber vs. Jens Pulver. I guess we should give up trying to promote Featherweights too, based on the same logic.
In MMA, having a baby is without question a career ender.
Shit! Somebody better tell Rosi Sexton that she’s retired. Bellator’s gonna be PISSED.
If females could be sold to the general public, don’t you think somebody would have figured it out for one of these sports already? As i said before, the only two sports in which female athletes have done solid business are in Tennis and Golf.
So what you’re saying is that, “Other than the sports that CAN be sold to the public and HAVE been proven successful, women’s sports CAN’T be sold to the public and HAVEN’T been proven successful.” Am I following you?
by madiq on Aug 16, 2009 10:14 PM EDT reply actions 9 recs
1. The talent pools for each of those respective sports are still very small. The males sports have a large number of high level fighters. Even a fraction of those athletes making the transition to MMA makes for a deep pool of talent. If a fraction of each female sport comes into MMA, we are talking about an almost non-existant pool of fighters… Which is what we have now.
2. Male Fighting has been a proven draw in countries around the world in both boxing and MMA. Just because one fight doesn’t get a huge gate, doesn’t mean the rest of Zuffa is a failure.
3. Sexton is the exception to the rule. Most women cut their careers short around 30 to have a baby.
4. Women’s sports can become popular for a short period of time, but they have no staying power. As I have pointed out, none of the female athletes in their respective sports have put a long-term dent into the mainstream. And the sports I talked about (Tennis & Golf) have a fanbase that will likely never move over to MMA. The people who go to a Wimdeldon Match aren’t the type to be at a fighting event. That’s high society stuff. For everybody else, which includes sports like baseball, basketball, soccer, etc….. Females don’t sell.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 16, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I attended Wimbledon this year!
And when I was growing up in Melbourne, I attended the Australian Open every year too.
That said, in England the sport is very posh. Tennis is far more accessible in Australia. Golf too.
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Aug 17, 2009 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions
I will start by noting that the largest flaw in your whole argument is that mens MMA itself is not particularly popular. Female MMA, therefore, can really only be expected to be popular relative to male MMA. I am unsure why you are so determined to not only dislike a division of MMA, but also to come up with lists of reasons why no one will ever like it. Nevertheless, I will address your points respectively.
To your first point (and let me pause to note here that having numbered points with bolded titles in all caps was a NICE TOUCH!!! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!!!): there are in fact a lot of female wrestlers, judoka, and kickboxers. More and more of them will probably be coming into MMA, just as surely as the men have. There aren’t, however, a tremendous amount of American female wrestlers, judoka, and kickboxers, which I suppose is the only population of people you considered.
To your second point, I will echo Cannon Jacques above: Female fighters simply do not have to headline every card or bring in every audience member to be ‘popular.’
Your third point is of questionable bearing on whether or not female MMA could be popular. MMA in North America has been around long enough now for the “pioneering generation” of fighters to phase out (mostly) and the next big wave of stars is currently in decline. Innumerable fighters have come and gone, and it’s really unclear how much this might have hurt the sport. This could conceptually be a reason why female MMA will not be as popular as male MMA, but I think that’s a pretty obvious idea that nobody is arguing in the first place.
The fact that other women’s sports aren’t popular doesn’t by default doom women’s MMA. As I noted above, MMA in general is not particularly popular. If the community of people who do enjoy MMA are so childish as to dislike women’s MMA in it’s entirety, for perpetuity, then I can only speculate as to exactly how much people actually like MMA.
Furthermore, women’s MMA is quite different than many other female sports, in that they aren’t performing acts that can be compared to the men and simply viewed as inferior. The WNBA looks rather slow and rooted to the ground compared to the NBA, but I don’t see a lot of people complaining about how crappy women’s tennis is. Female martial arts fights look more or less just like the male fights—the most important factor in both being the skill levels of the competitors, both absolute and in relation to each other.
It ends in an armbar or a strangle regardless.
by capital L on Aug 16, 2009 10:31 PM EDT reply actions 11 recs
Yes
When I was in college and was in the Judo club at my school we had a woman that was the French national champion come in to our class and give us like a seminar and work with us for the class and man she was freakin awesome. She was pretty sick at judo and it was awesome to just get the chance to spar with someone like that because she was actually “world class.”
She weighed no more than 130 lbs and she threw everyone.
(And she even wore a thong under her gi!)
by TennesseeTopTeam on Aug 18, 2009 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn’t go as far as to say that female martial arts fights look like male martial arts fight. The sloppy brawling, standing headlocks, and pulling someone on top of you into mount that occurred between the supposed top 2 female fighters looks nothing like a top level championship fight between male fighters. Not saying it wasn’t entertaining or that it will be impossible for women to look like the men when fighting, but they’re not there yet.
by filipinomix2oo0 on Aug 17, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Styles make fights. A lot of Wanderlei’s fights against competition that he simply out-hustled looked like that.
Watch Miku/Ward I & II and get back to me on exactly where women’s MMA can be.
It ends in an armbar or a strangle regardless.
Well… not exactly like that. I really don’t want to go to far in the other direction.
I’m simply adamant that there exist female fighters that put on excellent fights, and that they should at least get a fair shake rather than being dismissed out of hand (and usually out of sight).
It ends in an armbar or a strangle regardless.
I never dismissed female fighting or said that women’s MMA will never look like men’s MMA. To clarify, I said that what was marketed as number 1 and number 2 in female MMA didn’t look anything like what I would see in a fight between number 1 and 2 in male MMA, in my opinion.
by filipinomix2oo0 on Aug 17, 2009 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Supposed top 2, not actual top 2
Yeah, that fight was sloppy as hell, but no more than any number of fights between men that we’ve seen. Go watch Phil Baroni, or Evangelista Cyborg for that matter. There are piles of sloppy, ugly fights between men all the time. They just don’t get as much attention because there are so many more fights between men in general.
That’s why I put in there supposed top 2 because there are better women out there. But the fact remains when a fight gets marketed between 1 and 2, I expect some high level MMA, which I didn’t see last night. And I don’t think anyone will ever market a fight with Phil Baroni or the Male Cyborg as being the top 1 or 2 fighters in the sport, so that comparison isn’t fair.
by filipinomix2oo0 on Aug 17, 2009 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Just on your point about tennis
I grew up quite close to the sport of tennis, and I know alot of people (especially men who were semi pro or pro) who HATE womens tennis because of the lower standard.
I think that the discrepancy in ability is simply less obvious to the general public. For some reason people find it hard to believe that Venus or Serena could possibly get beaten (quite easily) by a man ranked 1000 in the world. Any woman outside the top ten would lose to most male college tennis players.
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Aug 17, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Basically all of your objections are mostly horseshit.
1) The same place all that wrestling infrastructure came from.
2) If I brought in a 1 million gate, I would consider myself popular.
3) Seriously? I think that’s been used to prove that women can’t do anything as well for pretty much everything. It’s called the pill. Women don’t have to have children if they don’t want to, or they can postpone it and start a family instead of doing the Ken Shamrock money-whore phase. All those women you mentioned are recognizable names. Don’t they prove you wrong?
4) Everything had, at one point, not been done before. It didn’t make it impossible. See airplanes, cell phones, and the 5 minute mile.
If you meant to say “as popular as men’s mma”, then yes you are right. But if you mean it will be impossible for women to make careers as professional mma fighters over the long run, I think you are mistaken.
by toxic on Aug 16, 2009 10:36 PM EDT reply actions 7 recs
What is the standard anyway? Two women just main evented a show on Showtime that might have been be the highest rated Strikeforce show ever. It’s not UFC, but if women can get exposure and fight regularly on Showtime, that’s a hell of an achievement on its own compared to where they were a few years ago.
For a lot of fans, they cheer for their favorite fighters. They don’t particularly love a beautiful pass to side mount, or a great armbar escape. They just root for their favorites to win. A ton of people at that show last night were fans of Gilbert Melendez and also went nuts for Gina Carano. She was just one more star on the same show, it wasn’t like two separate sports.
by Michael Rome on Aug 16, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’ll add that if the knee-jerk reaction to attempts to promote women’s MMA is always going to be “GRRR FEMALE ATHLETES AREN’T AS GOOD IT’LL NEVER BE POPULAR” then it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy. The women’s sector of the sport won’t grow, the talent pool won’t expand, it won’t attract elite combat athletes from other sports, etc.
Personally, I prefer to support attempts at pushing women’s MMA forward, in the hopes of getting more rad fights out of it. But I guess the pro-more rad fights position isn’t as common as I had once thought.
I’ll admit I am guilty of this to some degree. I can respect the fighters/athletes, but I prefer to watch the superior athletes, being the males, partake in the same sport.
Not saying it is right, I realise I could be/ should be more open minded, but I am definately not alone in my opinion on this one, which is definately going to be an obstacle to WMMA.
As ‘who me’ has pointed out several times, there is also the issue of women being violent participants in a sport being difficult to swallow for alot of people. I’ll be honest again here and say I would much rather see women as a ring girls than as beasts that could rip my face off.
'He built his whole reputation as a waffle house chef. They’ve been serving him up ham and eggs with a side of canned tomatoes' - Don Frye on Fedor Emelianenko
by Well Read Idiot on Aug 17, 2009 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions
I prefer to watch the superior athletes, being the males, partake in the same sport.
Hmm, I think this point hits the spot as to why I can’t seem to care very much about women’s MMA, it has been bugging me for a while why I just can’t seem to care.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
Should they have RING CARD GUYS for female fights to make you feel better about watching it?
Personally, I’ve never been a fan of ring card girls. I think it’s pointless. Same with Cheerleaders. With that said, those are the social norms that are hard to make different.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 17, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I grew up Southern Baptist in Kentucky, just the idea of women punching each other would send the whole town into a tizzy. For as far as we have come as a nation on the subject of women’s rights we still have a very long way to go. It’s a country where women can’t even get equal pay for equal work, the idea that a women’s combat sport will catch on in a big way is just a very huge hurdle to get over. I seriously know people (lots and lots of people) that would report women’s MMA to the FCC as obscene and inappropriate programming if they happened to see it on tv, many of them wouldn’t have any problem with men’s MMA at all. There are just a lot of societal problems that women’s mma has to get over that while incredibly stupid can’t be ignored.
I grew up Southern Baptist in Kentucky, just the idea of women punching each other would send the whole town into a tizzy. For as far as we have come as a nation on the subject of women’s rights we still have a very long way to go. It’s a country where women can’t even get equal pay for equal work, the idea that a women’s combat sport will catch on in a big way is just a very huge hurdle to get over. I seriously know people (lots and lots of people) that would report women’s MMA to the FCC as obscene and inappropriate programming if they happened to see it on tv, many of them wouldn’t have any problem with men’s MMA at all. There are just a lot of societal problems that women’s mma has to get over that while incredibly stupid can’t be ignored.
For the record…. I never said all female athletes would have babies. However, this is not a concern for a male fighter. The sport of female MMA could always potentially lose a fighter at an earlier age due to her wanting to start a family and have children.
And it’s one of the 3 things that can change the length of a fighters career compared to their male counterparts and make it harder to promote them for the longest period of time possible.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 16, 2009 11:06 PM EDT reply actions
Orville, Wilbur and Tony are lying on a grassy hillside looking up to the sky and....
Tony gets to his feet and angrily shouts, "4. IF IT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN!!! "
"Stop smiling you are about to be punched in the face !"
by Warhand on Aug 16, 2009 11:46 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
This debate is pointless without some amount of consensus on what “popular” means in this context.
by Jahbulon on Aug 16, 2009 11:52 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I do advertising for a WNBA team
The sport and league continues to grow, especially among women and african americans, and although it wont ever be the NBA, its not slowing down or receding in market share. The league doesn’t have to be as big as others, it just has to profit and continue to be stable.
Just because you dont care doesn’t mean someone else won’t.
The facts do not support your claim.
The sport and league continues to grow
I guess it depends on your definition of grow, if you use attendance as a measure you are sadly mistaken.
http://womensbasketballonline.com/wnba/attendance/sbsatten.pdf
Bloody Elbow Pound-for-Pound the Best in Ultimate Fighting (UFC) Commentary, News and Community
by ronniebonnie on Aug 17, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Leave it to a marketer to exaggerate/distort/lie.
by bigweeze on Aug 17, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
lots of points on both sides really...
People have referenced a general societal resistance to seeing women battered and bloodied, and while I think this is true, it’s also worth noting we’re in a time of changing norms, and that women are participating in
the military and combat at ever-higher rates.
Personally speaking I’ve never had much time for women’s team sports but I do watch women’s tennis (and I have to say I think looks matter a lot in that sport too…there’s a reason Anna Kornikova(sp) always got way more endorsements than the less attractive but much better Lindsey Davenport).
I don’t think women’s MMA will ever achieve the same stature as men’s, but that’s not to say there isn’t potential for interesting matches and appealing fighters.
by WanderleiNoooooo! on Aug 17, 2009 10:36 AM EDT reply actions
Always Relaxing, and Reaser
have both made some pretty good points… I think some of the arguments in this thread, however, need to be made more specific, as opposed to all these generalizations…
are we talking about world wide MMA? or MMA in the US (which is actually popular right now)…? I would also like to see what people think are the best women’s MMA fights, since people are getting offended when Reaser argues his point about women’s MMA not being as skillful, or exciting as men’s MMA (especially in regards to consistency)….
I'm like PacMan fightin you silly kids... throw ya Hatton the ring, and get knocked outlike Ricky did.
lol.
by Loot on Aug 17, 2009 10:51 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
There are women wrestlers. Women's wrestling is an olympic event.
It’s quite popular in Asia (and Canada, oddly enough).
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
It will never be popular for some of the reasons stated above. MMA is not THAT popular to begin with and Womens MMA will have that as a ceiling. Men watch sports generally speaking, and of the relatively small MMA demographic a percentage will never watch women compete for the simple fact that they are not as fast, strong, explosive, powerful or as technical. NFL is the most popular league in this country and as far as i know there is not womens league. NBA has the most succesful of tall women’s leagues and that is not very popular and is regularly attended by less people then the Florida Marlins. It is politically correct to defend womens sports and i for one am in favor of women being able to compete in any sport they so choose but lets not be childish in pretending that it will ever be “popular”
Bloody Elbow Pound-for-Pound the Best in Ultimate Fighting (UFC) Commentary, News and Community
by ronniebonnie on Aug 17, 2009 2:35 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Athleticism was actually my 5th Reason, but I ended up deleting it at the very end because I felt like I was going to get bashed for being sexist. However, it is a valid point. People can visually see the differences in the male and female athletes. It effects viewership.
The only game it benefits is female tennis. Why? Because with men it’s more of a power game and less volley’s. Women have longer points, which makes it more exciting. And they still hit the ball hard enough and are still perceived to be fast enough to make it exciting.
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 17, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Talent question...
This is probably a bit more comical…. but…
Bring in the gymnasts, dammit. Look at those young girls. They already have a tremendous work ethic. They have tree trunk legs and can do one-handed push-ups. Come on…. start transitioning some of them to MMA.
Secondly, female will get boxing in the Olympics soon, and it could open some doors up for some of them to try MMA. Wrestling for women would be great, but the progression from schools to MMA would take a long time.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
Mark Schultz was a gymnist, and then switched over to wrestling his senior year of high school. He ended up winning the gold medal.
Perhaps they could recruit the gymnists who have the athletic gifts but just end up growing to be to tall….
by AlwaysRelaxing on Aug 17, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, but that’s a guy.
Secondly, there aren’t a ton of tall girls in gymnastics, although I remember that ridiculously tall Horkina chick from years ago on television. She seems like a walking Corey Hill nightmare waiting to happen though.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 17, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
True, but...
What if a girl has a growth spurt and shoots up three or four inches one summer. It happens enough where I could see a female Mark Schultz eventually popping up.
by black dragon on Aug 17, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
One parallel I didn’t see in this post was Women’s Professional Wrestling. Yes, I know there are problems trying to compare a fake sport to a real one, but female professional wrestling has proven to be a very viable side-attraction in the U.S. for the last 10 years, and was huge in the 1950s. It also was very popular in Japan at one point, with headlining stars like Manami Toyota and Lioness Asuka at its peak. Not every female professional wrestling star even in the U.S. has looked like a pin-up model, either.
What I’m trying to say is that women beating the crap out of each other alongside men would be perfectly marketable on an undercard if you had enough talent. Women’s MMA is already becoming increasingly common on the D-League circuit, and with more women getting into the sport now, and making up larger and larger percentages of the “feeder” sports, I don’t see it going away.
Look at how the WWE presents women’s wrestling, they are all “Diva’s” (most are valets for male wrestlers) and they are either uber-hot or completely scary and they are all prepackaged in the same way that people around here don’t seem to like how Carano and Cyborg are being viewed. I’m sure a bra and panties MMA match or a lingerie pillowfight would do great numbers for Strikeforce but I really doubt that the pro wrestling route is the way anyone wants it to go.
^^This. If Women’s MMA were presented the way that Women’s wrestling is in the US (although TNA handles them slightly better, and there are some moderately successful women’s indies), it would represent a tremendous indictment of women’s athletics. I’m not saying that the women’s looks couldn’t be played up outside of competition in promotional materials, but they need to walk a fine line…
I wouldn't emulate the WWE model overall
TNA managed to run a successful women’s division for a while without everyone looking either like monsters or glamour models. Yes, most of them were attractive, but they smartest thing they did was just to play up their individuality, while hiring mostly women that could actually wrestle. TNA did eventually fuck everything up, but that’s because they are run by morons and tend to fuck up everything good they get their hands on.
Anyway, women’s MMA can be made into a viable side-attraction if they can market the fighter’s individually. Zuffa and Strikeforce already do a great job getting people to care about undercard fighters who aren’t title contenders, and I think they could do the same with women. They don’t need a lot of women to fill out a division, 12 under contract at any one time in any given weight division would be plenty. Some weight would have to be given to looks and uniqueness and general marketability in addition to pure skill, but I think they could find a balance, and every once in a while a star who can be a main-eventer or semi-main-eventer will emerge. Miguel Torres wasn’t the first WEC Bantamweight Champion, but no Bantamweight ever main-evented a WEC show until he came along and became a big star. The sixth WEC BW Title fight (Torres vs. Tapia) was the first to headline. Sooner or later another Gina Carano will come along, and until then women can still help out the undercard.
Okay here is the facts people....
Obviously this guy is an idiot and not educated in some great facts…
1) The talent is out there – we have four divisions with top ten rankings and some great feeder systems….
a) amateur wrestling – Miesha Tate has said when she started wrestling in Washington state there were only 5 women in her division, now there are over 200 in the state alone.
b) Olympians – women compete in freestyle wrestling, tae kwon do, and now boxing in 2012.
c) Tae Boxing has been on the rise for the past decade, and a lot of females have been making the transistion
d) Tuff-n-uff in Vegas had an all female amateur card and nearly sold out the place.
2) The gate isn’t everything – think about the advertising dollars as well. Carano-Young and Carano-Kobold were some of the hightest rated mma fights in tv history. And their fight segments was the highest quarter hour during the show. Showtime is already raving about the viewer numbers, and the attendance beat expectations – over 13,000 attended the Cynorg-Carano fight live (rough $750,000 gate).
3) I refer you to Kathy Long – a 41 year old multiple time Kickboxing world champion who just won her first mma fight this weekend. I have just written an article about a fight having a kid and coming back to training a few months ago. Plus LaTasha Marzolla, who had a kid last year, is competing in mma. As it comes to injuries, they aren’t as much susceptible than a guy is. If anything they are more flexible.
4) MMA just started 15 years ago if you think about it. It’s very young considering other sports where women compete. It took a couple hundred years for women’s boxing to be considered a legitimate sport. I again turn to the ratings he forgot to look up. Women’s mma has a lot of great role models and they have been living up to their billings.
I hate it when ignorant people don’t do their research.
Check out Fightergirls The place for all your Women's MMA News
http://www.fightergilrs.com
by M P on Aug 19, 2009 2:13 AM EDT reply actions 3 recs
Rec’d for solid reasoning…
But DO NOT directly insult somebody for making a contribution. If you disagree with his point, simply state you disagree.
Follow me on Twitter @lelandroling
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
by Leland Roling on Aug 21, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions

by 

















