Anthony Johnson Arrested on Domestic Violence Charges
Not news we want to be reporting. Promoted from the FanPosts by Kid Nate.
This story is still developing, but MMA Frenzy is reporting that UFC welterweight and fan-favorite, Anthony "Rumble" Johnson was arrested in California on June 27th on charges of domestic violence:

MMAFrenzy.com has confirmed with the Hayward, California Police Department that UFC welterweight Anthony Johnson was arrested on June 27 on multiple charges relating to an alleged domestic violence incident involving his ex-girlfriend.The charges include domestic violence, battery with a special relationship, criminal threats, and damaging a cell phone. Though he was arrested on felony charges, the District Attorney filed misdemeanor charges, each of which is punishable by up to a year in county jail and an undisclosed fine if convicted.
According to police, the incident took place at 10:49am PT on the 27th with Johnson then contacting police on his own before being arrested at 1:30pm that afternoon. Authorities said he was very cooperative and polite.
Details of the incident were not available, though based on the charges Johnson allegedly struck his ex-girlfriend during the incident and damaged a cell phone so that she was unable to contact police to report the incident.
This is shocking news to say the least. It is notable that Johnson himself contacted police and essentially turned himself in, but I'm going to hold off on commenting until more details are released, and it does look like we will learn more from official sources soon according to Kris Karkoski at Frenzy:
When reached for comment, Nathan Brodnax of MMAagents, which represents Johnson, had no official comment on his arrest and could not confirm any details of the incident, but said they would be issuing an official statement later tonight or tomorrow.
Johnson, who was bailed out by an undisclosed party on the 27th through a bonding agency, is next scheduled to appear in court for a pretrial hearing on July 17th.
Johnson is not currently scheduled to compete on any upcoming UFC card, as he recently dropped out of his TUF 9 Finale fight with Matt Brown due to injury. In his most recent fight, Johnson scored a first-round TKO over Luigi Fioravanti back in February at UFN 17.
Innocent until proven guilty, etc.
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Bloody Elbow readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Bloody Elbow editors or staff.
0 recs |
46 comments
|
Comments
I’m going to say the same thing here that I do every time somebody is arrested/charged: innocent until proven guilty.
by subo on Jul 9, 2009 8:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rampage would tell you that if you are a minority and/or poor, you are Guilty Until Proven Innocent.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Jul 9, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or if you’re ever accused of doing something to a woman (like Monson or the guy from Human Weapon). I just hate seeing morons on the Internet condemn a guy just because of an arrest.
by subo on Jul 9, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You must be thinking of a different country….Here, it’s usually the other way around. :(
Unfortunately.
"The path to enlightenment is through suffering"
by RearNakedChoker on Jul 9, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry, didn’t check SuPreMaCy’s response. Didn’t mean to double comment. :)
"The path to enlightenment is through suffering"
by RearNakedChoker on Jul 9, 2009 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thinking of another country?
There are many places in this world where the mere apperance of having committed a crime will cost you your life. Now it is true that many people jump to conclusions, but please lets not paint everyone in this country with that same brush. I had a very good friend of mine who was in a very heated argument with his ex ( in front of me). Nothing escalated other than words, she left & when she came back she had the cops who had to arrest him on her word alone to cover their liability. I have no idea what happened with Johnson, but I will give anyone the benefit of the doubt in these instances until the facts come out.
Arguing on the internet is like being in the special olympics, even when you win you are still retarded.
by dnevil001 on Jul 10, 2009 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand that there are criminal justice systems in other parts of the world that are much worse than our own.
And I’m sure you understood what I meant. Big black dude accused of hitting his girl? What do you think the cops first reaction was? Do you think it was, “Oh, this guy is innocent, we should reserve judgement on him until he has his day in court”? Let’s not be naive, this is the real world, like it or not.
note : I’m from a black and brown community, so I may have seen some things you’re not used to. Home of the LAPD, you dig?
Also note the “unfortunately” and the " :( " meaning I don’t like the fact that it is that way alot of the time.
"The path to enlightenment is through suffering"
by RearNakedChoker on Jul 10, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, that sucks. But what the hell is a charge for “damaging a cell phone”? Is that really a crime in California? Not to make light of Anthony’s situation, but I can’t fathom that as a law, nor the politics behind how that becomes a law.
by mo dogg on Jul 9, 2009 9:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
its a crime because of exactly what happened here
when you destroy someone’s phone to prevent them from calling the police (or ambulance or fire) that’s a serious matter and I have no problem with it being considered a crime.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Jul 9, 2009 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup. If it is a domestic violence case, and the victim’s phone is damaged, you are screwed. They can charge you for kidnapping, etc.
Terrible news for Johnson.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Jul 9, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could but didn't
And if you’ll notice, he was charged with misdemeanors instead of felonies.
If it’s a first time offense, he can probably plea it down.
by subo on Jul 9, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t you mean sequestration? Cause kidnapping seems like kind of a strtech.
by spectaa on Jul 9, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you prevent someone from answering the door when the cops arrive or calling 911, you can be charged for kidnapping.
by MMASuPreMaCy on Jul 9, 2009 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah ok. I read the us laws about kidnapping and it doesn’t have the same status in my country.
by spectaa on Jul 9, 2009 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, it is a misdemeanor
591.5. A person who unlawfully and maliciously removes, injures,
destroys, damages, or obstructs the use of any wireless communication
device with the intent to prevent the use of the device to summon
assistance or notify law enforcement or any public safety agency of a
crime is guilty of a misdemeanor.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=19890921031+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve
by hound on Jul 10, 2009 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmmm, learn something new everyday. Sounds like Anthony was either being a goofball when the cops showed up, or he ran into the wrong cops, with all 4 charges being tacked on. Sounds pretty messy, and good luck to all involved.
by mo dogg on Jul 9, 2009 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He probably cooled down by the time the cops arrived and tried not to worsen the situation.
by spectaa on Jul 9, 2009 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is not that messy. everything will be dismissed or pleaded out. stop exaggerating things
by blackzag05 on Jul 9, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope that you're right
Anthony Johnson is definitely one of my favorites, and it would suck to see him out of action for a while.
by Captain7 on Jul 9, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
any destruction of private property is a crime. I suppose it could have been his own phone though . I think Johnson deseves the benefit of doubt until proven guilty,even then I think its a private matter.
by TLAoutlaw on Jul 9, 2009 9:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
by definition
any criminal case is a public matter.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Jul 9, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Legaly yes , that doesnt make it ethical or morale to be up in someone buisness.
by TLAoutlaw on Jul 9, 2009 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man. Best wishes for Johnson and his shorty.
by IncomingF5 on Jul 9, 2009 9:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
NOOOOOOOOO
He needs Rampage’s lawyers. He’ll be indebted to the UFC but no way he goes to the jail if his record is decent.
Probation+Fine+Community Service
by Sokonojudo on Jul 9, 2009 9:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's terrible news to hear
But it is nice to see that he called the police and gained his composure by the time they arrived. Hopefully he’s able to get by with probation and community service. He has a very bright future ahead of him, but doing time will not help his development.
by Ryjo on Jul 9, 2009 9:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If he hit her... he should be punished
It really saddens me to see this crap still go on… what goes through a man’s head making them think at any point its ok to hit a woman. I don’t care if she cheated on him, had a gangbang with anthony’s two brothers and his dad whatever it is, if he hit her, he should definitely suffer the consequences
by yin hsiung on Jul 9, 2009 9:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
but keep in mind that being arrested, charged, having the story go public are all very real consequences. I’m hoping that its a first offense, that he learns from it and is able to do some community service and/or probation and get on with his life. He’s young and made a mistake. He needs to pay the consequences, but unless he’s got a record of prior domestic violence or other criminal behavior I hope he doesn’t do jail time.
Follow me on Twitter @KidNate
by Kid Nate on Jul 9, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is…
If he’s smacking around women now (IF), then there’s a good chance he’s done it in the past. Although he may never have been brought up on charges, these types of behaviors usually develop pretty early in life. Also considering he fights for a living, this doesn’t speak well as to what kind of man he is.
I’ll reserve judgement for the official outcome, but if it comes out that he beats his chick and fights for a living, there’s a strong possibility that he has anger management issues that won’t easily be resolved.
Sucks, because I was really starting to dig him as a fighter. If it’s true though, Fuck him. Throw the book at him, no mercy. Especially considering he’s a professional fighter.
"The path to enlightenment is through suffering"
by RearNakedChoker on Jul 9, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
first time offender or not
women-beaters need to get f*king owned. let some pot smokers out to make room, do what you gotta do. you dont beat women. ever.
from the forest itself comes the handle for the axe
by troy145 on Jul 10, 2009 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes sir! Stoners deserve their freedom a hell of a lot more than woman beaters. Hits from the bowl are way better than hits to the soul.
I’m in Cali where it’s legal (I got a card and everything and the cops don’t fuck with me!). I buy mine from a legitimate storefront, and let me tell you, that’s the way it should be everywhere.
"The path to enlightenment is through suffering"
by RearNakedChoker on Jul 10, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i didnt really mean
to give any credibility to tokers but more just to emphasize how much i hate woman beaters (aka cowards aka douchenozzles)
from the forest itself comes the handle for the axe
by troy145 on Jul 10, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Word,
I’m still just so in awe that I can smoke legally, I like to brag about it whenever I get a chance. :P
And tokers definitely deserve more credibility than woman beaters…There are alot of us out there who live productive, fulfilling lives, and are pillars of our communities. We just happen to enjoy a recreational habit that grossly misunderstood by the masses….A change is coming though. The propaganda from the past is slowly but surely being dissected and debunked.
I understood what you were going for though. :)
"The path to enlightenment is through suffering"
by RearNakedChoker on Jul 10, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know “innocent until proven guilty”, but if he’s the one calling about him being abusive, that does not look good.
Shameless self-promotion! http://twitter.com/scb0212
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Jul 9, 2009 10:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have trouble believing this...
Unless his is ex is Gina, I can’t imaging Johnson hitting her and her getting back up afterwords…
by EnsignFrog on Jul 9, 2009 10:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A.Johnson =/= chuck noris. Maybe he slapped her, it’s still a strike.
by spectaa on Jul 9, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope this isn’t true.
Keep firing Assholes!
Out out, you demons of stupidity!
by Ubernoober on Jul 9, 2009 10:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
is it just me
or did this take forever to break?
saw Anthony fight in Tampa in February and even though I always like Fiorivanti as a Marine, I was happy to see a guy who seemed pretty classy in Johnson take a W. But what do I know?
Even if he is innocent, am I the only one who thinks its really really easy to go through life without ever having to think about whether my federal battery charges will be dropped to misdemeanor?
from the forest itself comes the handle for the axe
by troy145 on Jul 9, 2009 11:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks scotty23 for the link and to Kid Nate for promoting it. I did my best to get as much information from both sides as possible, but AJ’s agent and the UFC both had no comment or were unable to be reached so we’re largely hearing only one of the story so far. It can’t be stressed enough that he contacted them on his own and was very cooperative, which may be why he’s facing misdemeanors and not felonies.
Complete details obviously aren’t available but from what I’m hearing he kicked down her door, pushed her and choked her then damaged her phone so she was unable to contact police. Based on one comment from someone claiming to know the victim (unable to be confirmed, but IP is from California) Johnson struck her during a previous altercation, causing her to blackout and leaving a scar. Take it for what it’s worth but I think it’s worth noting.
As many have said, innocent until proven guilty, but whether true or not it’s an unneeded distraction just 2 days before the biggest event in the history of MMA.
Owner and Editor, MMAFrenzy.com
by kriskarkoski on Jul 9, 2009 11:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn, sound like the majority opinion here is that he should already be convicted on a matter which, let’s be honest, NONE OF US KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT!
The posts here are all commenting on things that we’ve read. Everything we read is colored by the writer. Everything the writer writes is colored by their source. We are so far removed from knowing any of the real facts here that I think it is unfair to start passing judgement so prematurely!
IF he did something wrong, sure he should pay the price. But if he didn’t, then he doesn’t deserve this attack on his character from the female involved or from all the posters here.
How about we reserve our judgement until an actual judge can make one.
In either case, bad day for Rumble.
by JAMSmusic on Jul 9, 2009 11:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he and Guillard can hang out now….if he turns out guilty.
Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei.
http://theworldsoldestsport.blogspot.com/
by theworldsoldestsport on Jul 10, 2009 12:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
more like brandon marshall
from the forest itself comes the handle for the axe
by troy145 on Jul 10, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
These Situations suck...
because its easy for everyone to pass judgment anytime it is alleged that a man has hit a woman, yet none of us knows what happened…
by Loot on Jul 10, 2009 7:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with everyone saying we need to wait to pass judgment. The system is biased against men in these situations. I’m not saying that men don’t commit domestic violence, TONS do. But I have two reasons for believing it’s best to wait to pass judgment.
An ex-girlfriend attacked me and hit me with an uppercut to the balls. As I lay on the floor next to the phone I picked it up and dialed 911. On a positive note, they pressed charges and she pled guilty. However, as part of her sentence she was supposed to attend anger management classes. The (female) teacher decided to let her slide after attending one class. And the crazy thing is that when I spoke to my ex a few years after the incident, she told me that she received pamphlets about domestic abuse and women’s shelters in the mail after the incident. No one ever contacted me after she hit me and nothing came for me in the mail. I guess the prosecutor can proceed without the victim in MI. I only found out about my ex being charged years after the fact.
Calling the cops on her probably comes across as a bitch move on my part, but she was really unstable. I was sleeping on the couch at the time and had a hard time sleeping because I worried she was going to do something horrible to me in my sleep.
My other experience is as a law clerk at a domestic violence legal clinic in California. Most of our clients were women and when a man came to us for help, there was a palpable skepticism about whether he really needed a restraining order. The assumption was that most guys use restraining orders (especially TROs) as a power play against women. I didn’t fall into this way of thinking, but I saw other people do it all the time.
BUT violence against women is a very real problem all over the world, so there’s a reason it’s taken very seriously.
by cmsove on Jul 10, 2009 8:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



![Brock Larson reflects on his upset loss to Mike Pierce in an interview with MMA Junkie:
"I don't think the judges made the wrong call. They had to award him the win because the only thing that went on in the whole fight was takedowns, and he got them. I clearly lost the fight. Hats off to Pierce, but he has some issues to work on himself."
In the locker room after the fight, UFC matchmaker Joe Silva told Larson's manager, Monte Cox, "Don't worry about Brock. He's a fighter. We don't know what we're going to do with this other [expletive]. I don't know if I can watch another 15 minutes of that [expletive].".
"That was good to hear coming off a loss," Larson said. "In a weird way, that loss helps me, and it would have helped Pierce if he tried to be aggressive. Win, lose or draw, at least he's competing. People won't want to watch that stuff.
"I've always taken pride in going after and trying to finish my fights, and I get the upper hand always going after it and being aggressive. Pierce didn't have that attitude. He just wanted to eke out the win and get the [win].
"The W is important, but at the same time it's the entertainment business. People pay to watch, and they don't want to watch two guys hug belly buttons. Clay Guida, he makes more money on friggin' 'Fight of the Night' bonuses than he does on his fight wins."
"People look at film and say, 'This guy beat Brock? That's all he had to do,'" Larson said. "I have to get the Band-Aids out, cover that owie and not have to worry about that being a problem."](http://cdn1.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/84043/md97y25v01_small.jpg)















