Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

072209_fight_barnett_16_9

Josh Barnett's Camp Issues a Response on the Positive Drug Test

The media has reported that Mixed Martial Arts Heavyweight fighter Josh Barnett would not be eligible to fight Fedor Emelianenko at Affliction Trilogy as he was denied his California license due to an alleged positive test for 2α-methyl-5α-androstan-3α-ol-17-one, which is purportedly a metabolite of a banned substance.

Mr. Barnett was shocked at these allegations and was extremely disappointed to learn that Affliction had made the hasty decision to cancel the August 1st event in its entirety. Mr. Barnett vehemently denies intentionally ingesting any banned substances in preparation for the August 1st fight and he is looking forward to presenting his case to the California State Athletic Commission.

In the meantime, Mr. Barnett has yet to learn of the results of the B sample testing and he has not received any of the documentation that provides further details of the alleged positive sample despite numerous requests. In fact, the documentation that Mr. Barnett has received raises serious questions about the integrity of the sample and the validity of the results themselves.

At this time Mr. Barnett would like to thank his fans and colleagues for their ongoing support and faith in him. He intends to vigorously defend himself against these allegations and hopes for a swift resolution to this matter so he can get back to what he does best — fighting!

I would like to further add that Josh is as disappointed as all of his fans and supporters that he will not be fighting on August 1st. He also empathizes with all of the other fighters that were scheduled to appear on the card and shares their frustration and shock at the cancellation of the entire event.

HT: mmamania

over 2 years ago Weoweoweodotdeviantartdotcom_by_weoweoweo_tiny Anton Tabuena 25 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

hillarious and well deserving of a rec.

by Raker on Jul 30, 2009 3:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ingesting as in eating?

by bigweeze on Jul 29, 2009 11:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Ingesting as in not denying injecting.

And, “in preparation for the August 1st fight,” as in, he was taking them to work off some flab, or some other reason… just not for the August 1st fight specifically.

Sounds like he’s wording things awfully carefully.

by Meeaaat on Jul 29, 2009 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mr. Barnett vehemently denies intentionally ingesting any banned substances in preparation for the August 1st fight

thats the nail in the coffin.

by JaTinkles on Jul 29, 2009 11:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Gotta sneak that “intentionally” in there.

by Jahbulon on Jul 29, 2009 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

and gotta not mention 'shooting up'

If you see Mark Coleman in person, drop $5 on the floor and watch the fun as he tries in vain to bend down and pick it up.

by Ozzz on Jul 30, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who is Josh Barnett?

by steveoc24 on Jul 29, 2009 11:37 PM EDT reply actions  

ah yes

the good old “someone slipped me a mickey” defense

by woooburn on Jul 29, 2009 11:43 PM EDT reply actions  

don’t you guys notice that almost every fighter that gets caught doping almost always issues a statement similar to the one the josh just gave out?

i’m innocent, the samples were tainted, the whole testing process is in doubt, there was mishandling of samples, it’s the health supplement’s fault, the testing lab made a mistake… etc

this guy should never be allowed to fight in mma, those japanese orgs will lose all credibility if they sign him to an mma match

by theblade on Jul 29, 2009 11:51 PM EDT reply actions  

What credibility?

A wise man told me don't argue with fools
Cause people from a distance can't tell who is who

by thetakeover on Jul 30, 2009 12:09 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

this is about a week too late.

Nobody cares now. We’re all focused on fedorpalooza at least until friday.

And even so…fuck josh barnett

by willydynamite on Jul 29, 2009 11:53 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

You have a crappy publicist Josh. This should have come a week ago.

by Sokonojudo on Jul 30, 2009 12:10 AM EDT reply actions  

if i remember right, his initial reaction was “I didn’t take anything knowingly, but I have a good idea what set off the test.” It sounds like he’s gearing up for a blame-the-supplement-maker defense.

Does anybody who stayed awake during chemistry classes know if that alphabet soup of a banned substance is something which could possibly find its way into one of those big tubs of Roidade protein shake? I’ve heard of positive amphetamine tests from those things, but this seems different.

by Stanlee on Jul 30, 2009 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

In short, fuck you.

Did you also get slipped a mickey the other three times you tested positive, Josh?

If you see Mark Coleman in person, drop $5 on the floor and watch the fun as he tries in vain to bend down and pick it up.

by Ozzz on Jul 30, 2009 1:12 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

i hope he’s exonerated… great fighter. seems like genuinely a pretty nice guy. i hope he wins his court stuff and gets cleared to fight in the us at some point.

by the glza on Jul 30, 2009 1:26 AM EDT reply actions  

I hope he pays his debt to society, and more importantly to me, due to the countless hours that I could have stayed up watching Fedor maul him in the ring. He’s a bastard.

by FlyByKnight on Jul 30, 2009 1:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

That would be hilarious.

If the B sample came back negative and CSAC gave him a license, but Affliction had already folded so it didn’t matter.

Dana would probably sign Barnett immediately just to thank him.

I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.

by Llewdor on Jul 30, 2009 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought the same thing myself

Then we can has Barnett vs. Couture II?

Sans steroids, of course.

by ihateemo on Jul 30, 2009 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah.

And OJ will one day find he guy who killed Nicole.

If you see Mark Coleman in person, drop $5 on the floor and watch the fun as he tries in vain to bend down and pick it up.

by Ozzz on Aug 8, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

what he says he didn't do it?

If OJ was brought up on murder charges again and said he didn’t do it?

Yeah….wouldn’t trust him either.

by RipeTide on Jul 30, 2009 4:57 AM EDT reply actions  

in⋅gest /ɪnˈdʒɛst/
–verb (used with object)
1. to take, as food, into the body (opposed to egest ).
From dictionary.com

Though some steroids do come in pill form, my guess is that most steroid users don’t “ingest” them. Is this poor choice of words intentional?

by cmsove on Jul 30, 2009 7:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Skittles_small
Off topic- watch me sing!
26759_511613730864_104300343_30384429_7437048_n_small
UFC Undisputed 3: BE Fight Camp?
Small
Yuki Kondo
Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings