MMA in the MSM Watch: Britain's Most Respected Paper Covers UFC 100, Makes Huge Glaring Factual Error
by Kid Nate on Jul 16, 2009 8:13 PM EDT
in MMA News
Email
Print
I was pretty excited to see that the prestigious Financial Times had a feature article on UFC 100. The text itself is fine enough:
Last Saturday’s event is expected to have generated more than 1.3m pay-per-view sales, with each buyer paying $44.95 to watch three tightly contested bouts. It was broadcast live or nearly live in 70 countries.
UFC’s success and the willingness of the public to pay for televised fights is in no small part due to Mr White, the company’s president. Stocky, shaven-headed and prone to expletive-laden outbursts, the former amateur boxer owns 10 per cent of the company and is in charge of day-to-day operations.
Mr White is also UFC’s public face, signing fighters to exclusive contracts, negotiating deals with an array of heavyweight sponsors that include brewer Anheuser-Busch, the US army and Harley-Davidson, and fronting The Ultimate Fighter, a weekly UFC reality television show on Spike, a Viacom-owned cable channel.
But then I clicked through the photo gallery they had with the article and just had to shake my head. They had three different photos from the Jim Miller vs Mac Danzig fight and as you can see in the caption above, in each case they identified Miller and Danzig as Dan Henderson and Michael Bisbing -- not only misidentifying Mac Danzig as Bisping, but also spelling Bisping's name wrong.
Just pathetic.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How does Britain not know who Michael Bisping is when he’s their best-known fighter?
Shameless self-promotion! http://twitter.com/scb0212
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Jul 16, 2009 8:28 PM EDT reply actions
Apparently
the financial times doesn’t deem it respectful to spell people’s names correctly either.
oh that's just sad..
and people have been saying michael bisping is more popular than Ricky Hatton..
There's only one Ricky Hatton....
Some people might say that winning a fight makes you a better fighter but I don’t agree with that.- BlueberryMuffin
Bet someone feels like a right royal crumpet over at the Financial Times
"Like a ballet of violence clothed in fine Brazilian silk." ~ MMASuPreMaCy
by Benicio on Jul 16, 2009 8:36 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I don't know.
I mean Miller’s kind of got a Hendo thing going on with his hair. If you outfitted Danzig and Bisping with a couple of powdered wigs, they’d practically be twins.
I think mazagatti's non-mustachio look threw them off..
thus committing the typos.. a fairly excusable situation right there..
plus, there’s also the sexyama pics before that they had to caption too.. so a lapse in concentration isn’t really surprising..
by Anton Tabuena on Jul 16, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions
3 bouts
I guess henderson/bisping and lesnar/mir weren’t that tightly contested.
I dislike Matt Hughes and Twidder.
Hum?
Jim Henderson, Mac Bisbing (sounds right), and referee "Big John McCarthy (no?) are all in the pic, seems right to me :).
by JustinWF on Jul 16, 2009 9:28 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Michael Bisping can’t spell his name anymore.
Keep firing Assholes!
Thanks to Bisping's reenactment of the Battle of Cowpens, walla walla walla I'm an idiot.
He must have written this whole thing.
I dislike Matt Hughes and Twidder.
by MonkeyCHops on Jul 16, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions
And I’m unemployed.
How's the weather up your own ass? - Stephen Colbert
by Derek Suboticki on Jul 16, 2009 11:11 PM EDT reply actions
Epic Fail
A wise man told me don't argue with fools
Cause people from a distance can't tell who is who
To be honest, although irritating, this doesnt really matter I suppose. The FT dont, and shouldn’t, care for the sport aspect of it, the fact that they are even paying lip service to the UFC is nice (they rarely do football articles, and if they do, specifics of the sport or players are even rarer). Its a fluff piece, nothing more (although that doesnt absolve them of basic journalistic integrity).
Also, considering this is an online only article for paid members (I dont remember seeing it in yesterdays actual paper), the vast, vast majority who even read this wont care – they are entirely the wrong audience.
If nothing else, it shows how far MMA still has to go here.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
MMA Rankings
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
