In Search of the Elusive Mainstream

For many fans, mainstream press coverage of MMA is some kind of validation. Having been looked down upon for years for enjoying such a violent sport, seeing it on Sportscenter makes them think everyone else was just late to the party. Going mainstream is now the biggest straw man out there; it's a debate-shifting tactic more than anything else, and bringing it up assumes that going mainstream is actually an option. The idea that ESPN would one day have an "MMA tonight" and anchors of SportsCenter would discuss it alongside football and basketball as an equal was always a preposterous notion. Take away the two most controversial events at UFC 100, and you still have a blood-soaked mat starting the show, a man who couldn't open his eye and could barely walk after his fight, a vicious one-punch knockout, and a main event comprised of one man headlocking the other and beating his head in. After all this, do we really believe it is Brock Lesnar's antics that will keep this sport from going mainstream?
As a friend in the MMA community put it to me, Jimmy Fallon and Dancing With The Stars are mainstream. Why do people want to be a part of that so badly? There's a big difference between going mainstream and increasing public awareness. The UFC should aim for increasing the latter, and let the former work itself out in the long run. Most mainstream press reports on UFC 100 are positive; there are more online MMA writers focusing on how the mainstream will react negatively than actual mainstream reporters reacting negatively.
I've learned this weekend that many MMA fans really want pro wrestling style angles with fake heat. They want Matt Serra and GSP to pretend to hate each other while building up a fight, and then hug afterwards. They want Matt Hughes and Matt Serra to do the same. Mir has been "poking the bear" for weeks now, mocking the idea that Brock can even compete with him, and saying he doesn't deserve his spot. Brock took it personally, and told Mir where he could shove all the trash talk afterwards. The crowd booed Lesnar, and Lesnar flipped on them. The emotion he displayed was much more "real" than most of what we see in mixed martial arts. Brock Lesnar might be a legitimate psychopath; just about everything we saw was real. Maybe that's what is so disturbing.
We live in an age where a video on youtube explodes in popularity, and then CNN does a story on the video later in the day on how popular it is. The UFC is basically in the same position, which is why most press stories focus on how amazingly popular it is rather than anything else. Nobody should confuse this for traditional mainstream acceptance. Many in the media can't wait for the day that the sport's popularity goes away so they can mockingly refer to it as a fad. Rather than get on our knees and beg them to accept our sport, the best plan of action is just to keep delivering fights that fans want to see and win more and more new fans while keeping the old. Over time, that's the most reliable way to build a lasting sport.
Brock Lesnar is just a temporary bump in the road; he will get a lot of attention for another year or so until he loses, and then whoever beats him will be a big MMA hero for returning honor to the division, or some other such nonsense. You can see Frank Mir already playing this up. I'd share the concerns of others if this was happening all across the UFC, but one guy "disrespecting" the sport really isn't that huge of a deal.
71 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lets just make sure we're putting on good fights
and fights that deserve to happen
whether we increase popularity or hit the mainstream or whatever means piss all either way to me so long as the sport is quality.
he was injured. injured bad.
by troy145 on Jul 13, 2009 2:13 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
respect
for distinguishing between “going mainstream (boo! cookie cutter programming!)” and “becoming better established (yay! more money and fans!)”
Be water, my friend.
http://martialfarts.fightlinker.com
http://twitter.com/martialfarts
Good article
I especially appreciated the YouTube video analogy.
And if mainstream = Dancing With The Stars, I want nothing of it. Shows like that do nothing but pander to the lowest common denominator. A dumbed-down MMA event is essentially WWE. Yuck.
Boy did you miss a great night of entertainment. And it’s Fallon, not Kimmel, get your awkwardly unfunny hosts straight.
by Michael Rome on Jul 13, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Damn, no shit
I was in so much shock from the sight of Morris and his awesome text book sized cell that I couldn’t think straight. It likely happened while I was overseas. I must find this footage online. Did they do the whole reunion thing? I heard he was trying to some time ago.
I poop rainbows.
Rec'd
Funniest thing with Fallon since…ever, really…
Shameless self-promotion! http://twitter.com/scb0212
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Jul 13, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Zack Morris was f*cking Kimmel?
"And Joe for Matt Hughes, dislike may not be a strong enough adjective!" - Mike Goldberg
The most irritating viewpoints I see online are those that recommend certain changes to the UFC or to the sport in order to become more mainstream. Like the idiots who say the UFC should switch to a ring to be more palatable to mainstream tastes.
Make the best goddamn sports entertainment you can, and let the fans come on their own; the mainstream will follow. Thats what the UFC and Strikeforce do.
Rome,
I don’t think fans want “fake heat” as much as they want to perpetuate the notion that fighters earn “mutual respect” for one another in the cage. Viewed through this prism, the post-fight display of sportsmanship validates the idea that these men are not savage brutes, but legitimate professional athletes fiercely dedicated to winning, and even if there’s trash-talking, once the winner has been declared, the animosity dissipates. In that way, it’s like Kobe Bryant and Ron Artest going at each other on the basketball court, but embracing and congratulating each other afterwards.
We make allowances for “the heat of the moment” when we follow professional sports, but in the interest of setting a standard of sportsmanship, we feel that transgressions of sportsmanship warrant criticism.
Generally what I want is a trash talker to have his mouth shut, and when the trash talker wins and continues, I want even more for it to happen and will tune in to see it.
The other thing I like is when two people fight each other because they both enjoy fighting. Smith/Sell hooked me on MMA even before the awesome ending.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
Generally what I want is a trash talker to have his mouth shut, and when the trash talker wins and continues, I want even more for it to happen and will tune in to see it.
That’s all well and good, as long as you acknowledge that that’s the principle that drives the vast majority of professional wrestling booking — this notion of people paying money to see a ’heel" get his comeuppance.
Again, it isn’t like “real sports” don’t use this device in their storytelling and promotion all the time; it’s just important, in the interest of credibility/legitimacy to point it out when it occurs.
As to the argument about “mainstream acceptance,” it’s simple:
Mainstream equals more fans, which equals more revenue, which equals better compensated fighters, and the ability to attract more world-class athletes. Good for fans.
Mainstream also equals “respectable” journalists being able to cover issues that go beyond simple wins and losses, and message board “controversies” which deteriorate into flamewars. This allows writers to influence a grander swath of public opinion, and to apply pressure to business entities that would otherwise function under a cloak of power, money, and corruption. When the mainstream doesn’t care, many abuses go unreported, and people in power aren’t called on their behavior. To the extent that MMA media today is routinely marginalized and bullied by Zuffa, and some media outlets have to behave like thinly-veiled propaganda machines in order to get access, “mainstream” = accountability to the masses…which is also good for fans.
Obviously, there are people who can take the notion of “mainstream” too far, but by and large, there’s nothing wrong about wanting the thing you like to be accepted and important to a greater number of people.
Mainstream also equals "respectable" journalists being able to cover issues that go beyond simple wins and losses, and message board "controversies" which deteriorate into flamewars. This allows writers to influence a grander swath of public opinion, and to apply pressure to business entities that would otherwise function under a cloak of power, money, and corruption. When the mainstream doesn’t care, many abuses go unreported, and people in power aren’t called on their behavior. To the extent that MMA media today is routinely marginalized and bullied by Zuffa, and some media outlets have to behave like thinly-veiled propaganda machines in order to get access, "mainstream" = accountability to the masses…which is also good for fans.
What a crock of horse manure. I doubt very many people, even those who hate Zuffa, want the sport to become mainstream accepted, which is different than mainstream exposed, just so they can go cry to mommy about big bad Zuffa being successful.
Again I think people are mistaking acceptance for exposure.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
With all due respect, I don’t think you’re thinking very hard.
Perhaps you haven’t been able to read between the lines of every cause celebre of the past few years, but every criticism and defense of Zuffa’s business practices is tinged with an element of "this is/isn’t how other, more “legitimate” sports operate." And the unstated premise is that the media, courts, and other “respectable” institutions don’t LET it happen.
It’s also why something like Professional Wrestling can be FAR more exposed to the mainstream than MMA, but far less acceptable to the mainstream. I doubt that MMA fans want their sport viewed with the same disdain and derision.
Maybe it’s just you.
Maybe you should try and think a little bit harder yourself. This crying to mommy mainstream about big bad evil Zuffa is mostly a couple of hit job articles by places like mmapayout and a couple of hardcore anti Zuffa people posting on message boards. The entire bit I quoted there sounds exactly like something they would spew out. Those people also conveniently ignore that media outlets have their own agendas to push, just like Zuffa does. Most people want the sport to be accepted by the mainstream because they want the sport to grow.
As for business practices, most of the discussions lately have been about how the UFC is acting more like the mainstream sports and tightening down.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
by iiowyn on Jul 13, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
Rec'd
How's the weather up your own ass? - Stephen Colbert
by Derek Suboticki on Jul 13, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
For someone who likes the “crying to mommy mainstream” trope, you seem particularly sensitive to criticism of Zuffa. It might just be a little bit possible that critiques of how things are pervade the media, and that with the growth of the sport comes increased scrutiny. You might need to fine tune your “hardcore anti Zuffa” filter, or else you’ll work yourself into a tizzy defending the company from talking heads, pundits, journalists, and bloggers who might have a different view of what the sport should look like than you do.
Those people will be falling by the wayside soon enough.
The UFC’s domination over the MMA landscape is indisputable and, barring an epic collapse, unchangeable.
It’s all a matter of getting the final pieces now, and there will be more crying and bitching from anti-Zuffa sources than ever before – because they’re desperate and every day is another nail in their coffin.
How's the weather up your own ass? - Stephen Colbert
by Derek Suboticki on Jul 13, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions
You may be right about Zuffa’s inevitable world domination, but I doubt that the so-called “anti-Zuffa forces” will ever go away. That’s just not how these things work. The bigger something is, the more people have an interest in challenging or criticizing it. And if there are malcontents in the sport, they’ll fight for change if only to scorch the earth. I just think that people who sympathize with Zuffa have far less rationale for being so sensitive, because their arguments seem to be winning out. Obviously the losing side is going to be more vocal.
Are there anti-NFL voices that I’m unaware of?
How's the weather up your own ass? - Stephen Colbert
by Derek Suboticki on Jul 13, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Well there was an entire other league that challenged the NFL, around the same point in it's development as the UFC.
And there are still plenty of complaints about the NFL (and about football in general), ranging reasonable to insane.
And there always will be.
I suppose there are probably people on NFL message boards who respond to criticism by saying “If there was no NFL there’d be no Football at all so just love or or leave it,” but I can’t imagine it’s any more convincing in other sports than it is here.
The Declaration of Hendopendance
Crying to mommy mainstream just came to me, and I rather like how it sounds. Probably gonna use it more in the future.
Oh and just to set it straight, I am fine with criticism of Zuffa. What I do not like is stupidity and blatant two-faced agendas. If you have an agenda, be open about it. I hate people who try to bring down the successful for no reason and bitch just to bitch. Often I find myself doing the last part and I don’t like that I do. But that is mainly doing crap like taking out the trash or going to visit people I don’t care about.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
Fair enough, but I do have one question:
From where does VALID criticism of Zuffa and the UFC originate, and how good of a job do you do assessing reasonable critiques, and distinguishing them from “two-faced agendas” and “blatant anti-Zuffa hate?”
As for bitching just to bitch, I think that’s what the Internet is for (other than porn). Getting upset by THAT shit is going to drive you insane.
I personally hate manufactured grudges.
I had no problem with Lesnar getting in Mir’s face after the fight – there was legit animosity there. I don’t like how BJ said his beef with Sherk was hype, nor Serra & Hughes. It may sell more, and I doubt it hurts the sport any, but I don’t like it. Either have some respect and admit it’s just business, or show actual emotion like Brock did. Don’t weasel out with “It’s just talk”.
Shameless self-promotion! http://twitter.com/scb0212
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Jul 13, 2009 2:44 PM EDT reply actions
Just curious…how do you feel about mindgames, getting under an opponent’s skin through talking trash, as a way of mentally taking him out of his game?
I know that’s part of the “grudge” aspect and it’s a way to psyche out your opponent, and while it annoys me as a fan, I’m not going to begrudge the fighters any advantage like that. It’s also a way of pumping yourself up, boosting your own confidence, and I get that, too. They should do it if they want; I just don’t like hearing it, is all. I’m a grump about it – hey you kids, get off my lawn!
Shameless self-promotion! http://twitter.com/scb0212
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Jul 13, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m not so sure that the trash talk made him fight worse. By all accounts he trainded harder and was in better shape than ever because of it.
It’s an easy crutch to use now that he lost though. ‘He isn’t better, I just screwed up due to trash talk’
by Well Read Idiot on Jul 14, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
I’d share the concerns of others if this was happening all across the UFC, but one guy “disrespecting” the sport really isn’t that huge of a deal.
I don’t know if that’s your personal POV or you just stating what many have said. In my personal opinion, I don’t see where Brock disrespected the sport with what he did, and I’m fine with most of it. Now had he half trained and failed to make weight, that is disrespecting the sport.
Otherwise well said.
http://www.mmaforreal.com
Follow Me On Twitter@MMA4Real
Fightlinker puts it better
Fightlinker: Fuck the mainstream.
Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones
Sho nuff
How's the weather up your own ass? - Stephen Colbert
by Derek Suboticki on Jul 13, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I compare it to music, a lot of times when a band starts as an “indie” band and they get really popular and hit the “MTV Mainstream” then their own fans will disown them for doing something for the money and not just for the art of it.
As long as it stays honest, fair, competitive and just; then who cares how many people like it. The more money from PPVs, t-shirts, DVDS, action figures whatever than the more shows the UFC can put off, the better they can pay their fighters, the better chance they have to get a network deal and more free fights for us.
The idea that being mainstream is a bad thing is just petty people trying to keep something for themselves. “If its too cool I don’t want to like it”. Are you afraid that Perez Hilton might start liking YOUR sport therefore ruining it? As if being too popular is a negative.
I don’t want to see people make up shit to sell a fight but hey, thats life. If people like Tito weren’t around in 2005 to sell some of those fights (Shamrock, Liddell, Couture) then were would we be right now.
MMA lacks the cross-over star, the Gretzky of the 80’s for hockey, Jordan for basketball in the 90s, Peyton Manning for football currently, and last night we found our guy thats going to take us over the edge. His name is Brock Lesner and he will become the biggest name this sport has seen. (to this point!!)
Like it or not, if you want YOUR sport to become what you think it is then you have to get on board with the realities of pandering to the masses.
I would like mainstream exposure, but not acceptance, because for the mainstream to accept MMA then either the sport changes or the mainstream changes. Now that I think of it, the second thing would be awesome. But realistically, Brock mugging Mir like that is not something the mainstream would accept.
A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.
I don’t really care about the mainstream per se but I do wish MMA would get covered like any other real sport.
My case in point:
While waiting for my coffee to finish brewing in the office I decided to check the sports section to see if there was any UFC coverage. Not that I expected any information that I hadn’t already read 10x over online but I figured I’d see what people wrote.
After skimming through the first 4 pages, skipping over articles about cyclists, curling champions, and other obscure posts I found 1 tiny article just before the classified ads talking about how “ultimate fighting” is becoming more popular than Baseball and Football in Canada.
Wow.
I don’t care if all the asshats who watch ‘Big Brother’ while listening to the newest Brittany Speers album watch the most recent MMA event but goddamn if it doesn’t piss me off that probably one of the biggest MMA events ever put on didn’t get even 1 blurb, buried under articles for ultra fringe sports. BAH!
I don’t really care about the mainstream per se but I do wish MMA would get covered like any other real sport.
That was kinda my point, though — I think that’s what MOST fans mean when they say that they want the sport to go “mainstream.”
The worst part about this discussion is that I do agree with the notion that EVERYTHING that happens in MMA needs to be filtered through the lens of “But ooooh, what would the MAINSTREAM think?”
That said, there is something to the idea of the sport having a culture, and I think that there’s a bit of a power struggle between the “Dark Ages” fans, the “TUF Era” fans, and the “ESPN” fans. I think that people have different visions of what MMA should be, and what it means to be a “real fan.” Because of this, the struggle to shape the sport around people’s preferences becomes deeply personal. It isn’t enough to say that I think something was over the top or disgraceful; people want to ascribe deeper ramifications to their reaction. I’ve been guilty of it myself, but I at least acknowledge it, because I sincerely do see benefits in the sport looking one way rather than another. However, I try not to make the “Ooooh, what would the Mainstream think?” argument too much, because 9 times out of 10, it’s kinda irrelevant.
This is probably the system’s way of telling us to quit arguing with guys who are disturbingly fond of Latin phrases.
by An Old Friend on Jul 13, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Experiment: will you allow me to respond to your post, even in an empty calorie kind of way like I’m doing here, without getting in the last word? I’m guessing no. (If I respond beyond this, I deserve a great deal of ridicule.)
by An Old Friend on Jul 13, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions
I sure hope not
because jimmy fallon is mainstream. I wouldn’t want to be something jimmy fallon is.
Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
You make some money on this card, logic? I’m so pissed I didn’t put Coleman in my parlay.
How's the weather up your own ass? - Stephen Colbert
by Derek Suboticki on Jul 13, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions

by 












