The Ultimate Fighter 9 Finale Results: Scoring Diego Sanchez vs. Clay Guida
There appear to be disputes about how the main event was scored and with good reason. Even the first round where Sanchez is the clear winner poses problems for scoring. Let's walk through each round and underscore why there is debate and why this fight is difficult to score.
For help and some different perspective, let's use the Sherdog.com staff (all very competent individuals) round-up and scoring. Round 1:
Jordan Breen scores the round: 10-8 Sanchez
TJ De Santis scores the round: 10-9 Sanchez
Loretta Hunt scores the round 10-9 Sanchez
Clearly there is no other way but to give Sanchez the round. That much is certain. The question then becomes, when to score a round a 10-8 versus a 10-9. Referee John McCarthy argues a 10-8 round should either be when the beating is so severe and the fight was so close to being stopped from damage that we must award a two point differential or when there are two Ds: damage and dominance. In other words, if you offensively damage your opponent badly and also positionally control him for the course of the round, that's a 10-8 round. The problem? In MMA, there are no defined criteria for what constitutes a 10-8 round. Judges are left to borrow analogous situations and principles from boxing or invent their own. Clearly Guida was hurt badly enough to bring the issue up of scoring the first round 10-8, but without some guidance on what makes a 10-8 a 10-8 in MMA, it's not a given the round was or wasn't a two point advantage for Sanchez.
The second round is where things start to get hairy. Here's how the Sherdog.com staff scored it:
Jordan Breen scores the round: 10-9 Sanchez
TJ De Santis scores the round: 10-9 Sanchez
Loretta Hunt scores the round 10-9 Guida
Right away it's obvious this was a close round, but who is the rightful winner? I personally scored the round for Sanchez, so let me explain my view point. Yes, Guida got the takedown and was able to keep Sanchez on his back for a large majority of the round. However, there are two problems for Guida. First, he didn't pass guard. He doesn't have to pass guard or even attempt as long as he's doing damage, but the amount of damage inflicted in this round was largely delivered by Sanchez off of his back. Guida landed a couple of elbows and some hammerfists, but that was it. The hellacious elbows from Sanchez were for more effective damage. Let's add to that how well Sanchez controlled the posture of Guida as well as the admittedly stuffed kimura and armbar attempts. And one more critical feature: Guida gets the points for the takedown, but once in guard the full guard position is regarded as a 50-50 predicament. The fighter on top can throw more strikes and has a few submission attempts, but the fighter on bottom has more submission opportunities with a little striking thrown in. If we regard that position as 50-50, the question then becomes who did more damage and who controlled the positioning? It's close when trying to decipher who did the controlling of positioning, but the damage was done by Sanchez. It's admittedly a very close round, but Guida being in top position means very little without doing damage.
In addition to a close second round, the third was also tough to decipher. Once again, here's how the Sherdog.com staff scored the round along with the official ringside judges' tallies:
Jordan Breen scores the round: 10-10 (30-27 Sanchez)
TJ De Santis scores the round: 10-9 Guida (29-28 Sanchez)
Loretta Hunt scores the round 10-10 (29-29 Draw)
Judge Patricia Morse Jarman turns in a 29-28 scorecard for Guida. However, judge Glenn Trowbridge scores the bout 29-27, and Nelson Hamilton scores the bout 29-28 for the winner by split decision, Diego Sanchez.
Reasonable people can disagree, but I have no earthly idea how one scores this fight for Guida. Be that as it may, I saw this round for Sanchez as he did damage standing, stuffed takedown attempts and was much closer (albeit still not that close) with the kimura and armbar attempt. Guida also landed some shots standing and rode on top for a decent portion of the round after claiming top control from Sanchez's modified back-take. Sanchez did briefly have Guida's back and at least attempted a modified RNC for a short time before conceding position, but I admit it wasn't close. So, again, from full guard we are in a 50-50 scenario. Who did more damage, positionally controlled and came closer to stopping the fight? I'll give Guida some points for keeping Sanchez flat on his back, but unlike the Danzig fight where Danzig was trying to get back to his feet and therefore allowing Guida to be the wrestling aggressor and back tacker, Sanchez was willing to fight from the bottom. And from bottom he did an excellent job of nullifying the offense Guida possessed. Guida was never really able to stand and rain punches. He was forced to use hammerfists and a handful of short elbows while fighting off submission attempts/posture control.
As a recap, I do concede one can make a case for Guida taking the second round although that's not personally how I would score it. But to suggest that over the course of the fight Clay Guida was robbed is not supported by the evidence even if we don't give Sanchez a 10-8 round. However, it is also clear that scoring this fight is actually quite difficult and there are myriad ways to parse what happened. It's also a reminder that there needs to be some sort of guidelines or criteria for what does and does not constitute a 10-8 round. The sport and its fighters deserve no less.
66 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
29-28 Sanchez
Rounds 2 and 3 were very close, Octogon control=Guida, Damage= Sanchez
The question should be, are octogon control and damage done equal factors in judging? Or is one more valuable then the other?
if i have great takedown defense, and you cant take me down, but pummel me on the feet… then i dictated octogon control, right? If Guida took sanchez down but got ruined for doing it, I don’t see how he gets rewarded for it.
I think it’s pretty telling that Guida didn’t try to take Sanchez back down in round 3, that guard was nasty.
Ironic because there is another poster on here that feels that he has no earthly idea how one scores the fight for Sanchez
And that poster is NOT me. But I feel that this shows the flaw in scoring in that a takedown and having top position with doing little on top is somehow worth a lot.
I had sanchez winning the first and third..
If I was actually the judge, I wouldve gave the second too, cause I think damage, amount of strikes weighed more than guida being on top. But I knew most of the time, judges score the guy on top as the winner so I conceded that they’ll give the round to guida..
The third, I gave to sanchez, because nothing really happened there except diego taking the back and trying multiple sub attempts.. Had it been a takedown by guida maybe it wouldve been his round, but I don’t think he did anything to score points in the third to get it.
This fight highlights just how badly judges need some sort of universal guidelines upon which to score mma bouts… the fighters deserve it and the fans deserve it. There are quite a few question marks in terms of how to properly score a fight that are simply not universally addressed/accepted (what is a 10-8? how much does a take-down count for? how about getting up from a take-down? wtf is octagon control exactly and how do you determine it? do you get points for a submission attempt, or a submission escape? etc etc)
See...
I like the “human” judging element of leaving a lot of things up to individual discretion I like that some judges favor certain aspects more than others. I guess for me a part of the charm of MMA is the human judging element
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Jun 21, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Just
like the strike zone in baseball. A machine could do it better but who in the hell wants that?
I do. Badly. I hate the way umps call their own zones.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Jun 21, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Having a human judging element is one thing, but not actually having a set of universally accepted rules or even concrete guidelines for scoring is entirely different. If you want to use the baseball analogy, it would be like an umpire deciding a pitcher only needs to throw 2 strikes to get a batter out instead of 3… except he doesn’t tell anyone until AFTER the 2nd strike is thrown!
Took the words right out of my mouth...
And then typed them in a much more intelligent and well thought out way than I ever could.
I scored this fight in favor of Sanchez for rounds 1 and 3 for the same reason that I scored Fisher/Uno in favor of Spencer Fisher. Controlling position is well and good but getting a take down doesn’t automatically account for anything. Guida did LESS on the feet than Caol Uno did, and you could see it in his eyes and you could hear his corner telling him that taking the fight to the ground for 5 minutes is the only way.
The first round was a 10-9 for Sanchez. I can maybe see someone scoring it a 10-8 but I don’t think Diego did quite enough to warrant that. But there’s no way this round gets scored for Guida.
He managed to get a takedown in round 2, but literally put his head on Diego’s chest and did nothing but attempt to avoid submissions and the rough (but not really damaging aside from the cuts) elbows. Maybe Clay landed a punch or two (giving him the benefit of the doubt) and a solid elbow, but even from the top position he was out-scored by Diego Sanchez. I gave this round to Guida because he was on top for so long and the elbows weren’t that bad. Maybe in retrospect I would score this round a draw because almost nothing was accomplished.
Round 3 was mostly Diego for the first like 3 minutes, controlling the octagon and landing strikes while Guida covered up and waited for the opportunity to score a take down. Eventually he does, after he eats some shots, and then literally lays there without even TRYING to improve position or throw a punch. After several seconds of Diego realizing he’s not going to sweep Guida and instead tries to prevent him from scoring, so he goes to the kimura until the clock wears off. Once again, I don’t understand how anyone can score this round for Clay Guida. Actually, now that I think about it, Guida didn’t even get the takedown. It was stuffed and Diego tried to spin for his back and couldn’t get a hook in and so Clay was able to get back into guard. If anything Diego gets a point there for aggressiveness and trying to finish the fight.
My understanding is that you have to do something with a take down in order for it to amount to much. I gave Clay a little credit for the couple take downs he got but fact is he did ZERO damage, made ZERO attempts to pass guard (and in fact frequently relinquished position), made ZERO submission attempts, and landed maybe three decent strikes the entire fight.
i scored that fight 30-26 for Diago.
YOU SHOULD NEVER GET POINTS FOR A TAKE DOWN IF THERE IS NO DAMAGE OR ATTEMPT TO FINISH . If you go by wrestling rules and give points for takedowns, then you have to give points for the escape, which no one in mma ever does.
"I’m not going to stop yelling because that would mean, I lost the fight!"-Kenny Powers
shooter/cutter for AllElbows.com
by ekc on Jun 21, 2009 12:31 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
I agree
I scored it 30-27 Sanchez; second round meant nothing for Guida since Sanchez did more damage
"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? ... That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Feb. 28, 2008
by lovingmma25 on Jun 21, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
that is a valid point...
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Jun 21, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Technically, by the unified rules, judges are supposed to count sweeps and reversals out of guard the same as a takedown. I think you have to count a takedown in favour of the fighter who gets one, but one takedown does not a winning round make.
by McEwen on Jun 21, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
does that mean a sweep to mount or taking the back or just standing up?
by phantasma475 on Jun 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Good point
In most of the grappling tournament I participate in, sweeps are worth as many points as reversals. So essentially, if a fighter gets repeatedly taken down and gets back up (ignoring damage) it’s a draw.
That’s how I scored it, though it is interesting that the score doesn’t really capture how close the fight was. I suppose the third round could have been a draw.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on Jun 21, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I rewatched the fight today. On the liveblog last night I scored it 29-28 Guida but I think I let emotion take me over as I typed.
Rewatching I gave the first to Diego 10-9 (close to 10-8 but I didn’t go there since Clay had reasonably successful moments), second to Diego 10-9 (damage off the bottom completely beats simply “being on top”) and third to Clay 10-9 (I thought he figured out Diego’s timing and was landing solid counter rights early and won a close round)
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Jun 21, 2009 12:51 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t agree that the takedowns in the second mean nothing at all. It would definitely have been more relevant if he took him to half guard or side control, or landed more frequently, but he was still controlling where the fight was to some degree. He was still pressing sanchez against the cage (which I believe prevented successful rubber guard play, not the fact that diego isn’t flexible like Rogan said). and he still landed some good elbows.
Combined with Guida landing some good counter straights on the feet to make that more even… I don’t really know how to score this round. I’m tempted to give it to guida though
It’s 50/50.
With open scoring Rich doesn’t get close enough to Wandy to get hurt in the 3rd round of that fight. Sure, Wandy knows he needs to get the KO to win, but Rich knows the only way to lose is to get stopped.
I wouldn’t mind see it experimented with in somewhere that isn’t the UFC, but it definitely isn’t an open and shut case that open scoring will be better.
Open scoring ruins fights..
it ruins both the drama of watching fights and fighters actually fighting. In boxing it happens very often when there are fights with open scoring. Once a guy knows he is comfortably ahead he just shuts it down.
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
by Brent Brookhouse on Jun 21, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions
It was cool to see Diego win a fight off of his back without a submission.
Guida tried to make an exciting fight boring the way he always does and finally someone was able to punish him from the bottom for it. Diego won the fight from his back in the second round IMO.
"Stop smiling you are about to be punched in the face !"
I agree with the judge that gave the fight to Guida.
by Derek Suboticki on Jun 21, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions
I can’t see any way to score the first 10-8 since Guida landed a fair amount of punches to the body and elbows to the head on the ground. He had too much offense to call it 10-8.
Who the hell knows if Rd 1 was a 10-8
I’ll tell you, no one knows, because there is no universal agreement on what constitutes a 10-8 round. It’s just a lot of people forming their own personal opinion.
It’s just a lot of peopleforming their own personal opinion.judging.
Fixed.
by Derek Suboticki on Jun 21, 2009 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions
That is, by definition, what judging is. I completely agree with people who say that if a contest is resolved solely by judges, it’s not even a sport.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by Scott C. Broussard on Jun 21, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Gymnasts have shown the most adaptability to learning other sports out of all athletes. Gymnastics is a sport.
Really? What’s that based on? (honest question)
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Jun 21, 2009 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I meant what are examples of gymnasts showing the adaptability to learn other sports. And how is this compared to other athletes?
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Jun 21, 2009 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I had the fight scored 29-28 for Sanchez with Sanchez winning the first and last round.
I’m finding it interesting that the argument is being advanced that takedowns shouldn’t be considered heavily on the score card if damage doesn’t result from the top position. I seem to recall very few people believing such a thing when it was Michael Bisping as opposed to Diego Sanchez on his back.
If this is a reference to the Hammil fight, it’s pretty weak. Hammil should have won the decision in that fight because he did better than Bisping when it was standing, not because of anything that happened on the ground.
by George Lucas on Jun 21, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions
sounds like he is referring to Bisping vs. Evans
Evans repeatedly took Bisping down, but did almost nothing once he was on top.
Even then, the argument against Guida in this case is that he took so much damage even though he was on top. I don’t remember Bisping doing anything particularly threatening when Evans had him down.
by George Lucas on Jun 21, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions
More rounds
I was so sad to see this fight end. I wanted it to be 5 rounds. Hell I think these guys could have gone all night.
how can having a guy in the guard who wants to be there be 50/50?, Clay loves being in the guard that’s where he does the most damage. He also more than delivered enough gnp from the top in the second to win the round considering he had Diego on his back for 4 minutes and 30 seconds. Clay also won the stand up and scored a take down in the third to win that round, i’ve seen the fight 4 times now and it there is no way that Diego won that fight and some of the scores i’m seeing here are even bigger wtfs?.
Sanchez was also content with having Guida in his guard. And Sanchez did more damage.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Jun 21, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
For what it's worth
FightMetric had it 30-26 for Sanchez.
So that’s a 10-8 first round and Diego winning the second (not even close according to them).
the one clay guida lost to diego sanchez
by George Lucas on Jun 21, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
^this
Sanchez did more damage in every round and absolutely mauled him in round 1.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Jun 21, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Again where do people keep getting this stuff, it’s like all people saw from round 2 was Diego’s elbows from the bottom and completelly ignore Clay’s elbows and hammer fist from the top. Diego in no way did more damage in either the second or third rounds, both rounds where controlled entirely by Guida.
Yes, he did. Watch it again.
Bolts from the Blue // "Game over." - Jamal Williams
Bloody Elbow // "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken
by Richard Wade on Jun 21, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
















