Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bracketology 2012: Duke Finally Steps Up To The No. 1 Line

Gambling Spotlight: UFC 98

Leland's UFC 98 preliminary picks here.

Lyoto-machida-rashad-evans-ufc-98_medium

Rashad Evans

UFC LHW Champion
#1 Light Heavyweight
TUF 2 Winner

Lyoto Machida

#3 Light Heavyweight

+190 (BOOKMAKER) Best Line -200 (BODOG)
29 Age 30
5'11" Height 6'1"
13 - 0 - 1 Record 14 - 0 - 0
5 / 2 TKO / SUB 4 / 2
Jackson's Submission Fighting Camp Black House
W - Griffin (TKO)
W - Liddell (KO)
W - Bisping (SD)
Last 3 Fights W - Silva (KO)
W - Ortiz (UD)
W - Sokoudjou (SUB)

Enter the Dragon, baby.  The valuetown known as Machidaland has been shrinking with each fight, but the value's still there.  Like I told Cage Writer's Steve Cofield, Machida is my super ultra lock of the year (ed. note: not really lock of the year).

Why do I like Machida so much in this matchup?  Well, can you really bet against a guy who drinks his own piss for medicinal purposes?  I know I love a good, warm glass in the morning.  In all honesty, though, I think footwork's going to be the deciding factor.

At risk of stepping into Jordan Breen's House of Pain, Evans has been able to mask some bad footwork habits with his explosive, athletic nature.  Evans has two big issues that I've noticed.  First, he has happy feet.  Now, this isn't always a bad thing, but I find that he ends up leaving his feet while bouncing around.  Second, he tends to step "backwards."  For instance, when he steps forward, he'll start with his back foot.  Or if he steps to his right, he'll start with his left foot.

These are the kinds of mistakes that someone as technical as Machida will take advantage of.  When you step with the wrong foot, you lose your base which opens you up to strikes or takedowns.  And while Machida doesn't rely on typical MMA takedowns like double and single legs, his use of a variety of trips and sweeps are very effective, and should find their mark here.

In the interest of transparency, I've bet against Rashad in both the Liddell and Griffin fights.  In the Liddell fight, Rashad took a gigantic leap forward at the same time that Liddell fell flat on his face (literally).  With Griffin, I thought Forrest's size and volume would be enough to overwhelm Rashad and take a decision.  And for the first two rounds, I was very content with that prognostication.  Then Forrest threw a lazy kick, Rashad knocked him on his ass and pounded him out.

I don't think it takes a genius to recognize that trying to out-Machida Machida is an exercise in futility.  If Rashad fights the same fight he did with Liddell or Griffin, he's going to end up giving away rounds and, in all honesty, risk getting shut out.  If I'm mapping out Rashad's gameplan, I'm telling him to chase Machida down, tie him up, shove him against the fence, and try to wear him out.  I also wouldn't discourage Rashad from trying to put Machida on his back.  Using this strategy, you might win the first round or two and, in the process, tire Machida out in the later rounds.

The problem, of course, is tying Machida up.  He not only avoided Ortiz's takedowns and clinch attempts, he threw him off with ease.  And Ortiz is arguably the biggest guy at 205.  Still, if you can successfully tie him up, you take him out of his game, and that's a good first step in solving the Machida riddle.

Ultimately, though, I really like Machida in this fight.  Though, I really like Machida in any fight at 205.  Whatever speed advantage Evans might have (and I believe that advantage is marginal to begin with) will be offset by the superior footwork and movement of Machida.  I have a hard time envisioning a scenario where Evans wins a decision, and the likelihood that a guy who has made so few mistakes makes one big enough for Evans to finish him is minimal.  I like Machida up to -250 and as high as -300 if you want to be aggressive.  And get used to seeing Lyoto Machida in main event title fights for the next couple years.

Star-divide

Matt Hughes

Former UFC WW Champion
#5 Welterweight

Matt Serra

Former UFC WW Champion
#11 Welterweight
TUF 4 Winner

-260 (BOOKMAKER/BODOG) Best Line +230 (5DIMES)
35 Age 34
5'9" Height 5'6"
43 - 7 - 0 Record 9 - 5 - 0
13 / 18 TKO / SUB 1 / 4
The H.I.T. Squad Camp Serra Jiu-Jitsu
L - Alves (TKO)
L - St. Pierre (SUB)
W - Lytle (UD)
Last 3 Fights L - St. Pierre (TKO)
W - St. Pierre (TKO)
W - Lytle (MD)

If you haven't heard, these guys really don't like each other.  Really.

Anyway, I bet Serra early at +160 (bad), saw the line hit +260 and put more on (because I can't let him beat me both ways), and now the line sits right about where my total play is at (+200).  And I'm still not really happy with the play.  If Serra can keep this fight standing, I like his chances.  Hughes, for whatever reason, hasn't developed an adequate striking game.

However, Serra remaining on his feet is a big if.  Yes, Hughes looked like an amateur against Georges St. Pierre and Thiago Alves.  But St. Pierre and Alves are absolute tanks at 170 with extremely dynamic styles and athleticism.  The only reason Serra fights at 170 is because he won a contrived reality show and pulled one of the biggest upsets in MMA history out of his ass.

Hughes loses this in two ways.  1)  Matt Serra has made significant strides in his ability to stay off his back or 2) Matt Hughes has fallen off a cliff.  I think the current line is fairly efficient, but I do like a play on Hughes up to -275.

Xavier Foupa-Pokam

Drew McFedries

-175 (BOOKMAKER) Best Line +160 (5DIMES/BODOG)
26 Age 30
6'1" Height 6'0"
20 - 9 - 0 Record 7 - 5 - 0
11 / 7 TKO / SUB 3 / 1
Unknown Camp Miletich Fighting Systems
L - Kang (UD)
W - Uscola (KO)
W - Rudakov ( SUB)
Last 3 Fights L - Leites (SUB)
L - Massenzio (SUB)
W - Eastman (TKO)

In the la la land at Sports Intertional sportsbook, Drew McFedries opened up as a -227 favorite.  Who knows what's going on there.  Now Professor X is about a -185/-200 favorite around the 'net.  This line is pretty accurate.  McFedries really shouldn't have a UFC job, and Foupa-Pokam has much more technical striking.  However, Drew does pack enough power and Foupa-Pokam keeps his chin up often enough that we could see X's lights put out.  A small play on Professor X at -175 is OK here.

Dan Miller

#22 Middleweight


Chael Sonnen

#17 Middleweight

-200 (BOOKMAKER/BODOG) Best Line +185 (5DIMES)
27 Age 32
6'0" Height 6'1'"
11 - 1 - 0 1 NC Record 21 - 10 - 1
1 / 6 TKO / SUB 7 / 3
Unknown Camp Team Quest
W - Rosholt (SUB)
W - Horwich (UD)
W - Kimmons (SUB)
Last 3 Fights L - Maia (SUB)
W - Filho (UD)
W - Baker (UD)

What happens when you mix a guy with poor submission defense and a lack of in-cage intelligence with a camp that's not known for it's gameplanning?  Chael Sonnen.  This is like a reverse ground-version of the Professor X/Drew McFedries fight.  Sonnen's so susceptible to submission and Miller's a good grappler, that it's hard to see the fight play out any other way.  The biggest worry from Miller's side is that Sonnen's wrestling is extremely good and it's not out of the realm of possibility that Sonnen can stifle him for 15 minutes.  I feel like there's still value on Miller, but I'm not confident enough to offer an official pick.

Sean Sherk

Former UFC LW Champion
#4 Lightweight


Frank Edgar

#18 Lightweight

-300 (BOOKMAKER) Best Line +275 (BODOG)
35 Age 27
5'6" Height 5'6"
33 - 3 - 1 Record 9 - 1 - 0
9 / 12 TKO / SUB 2 / 2
Minnesota Martial Arts Academy Camp Almeida Jiu-Jitsu
W - Griffin (UD)
L - Penn (TKO)
W - Franca (UD)
Last 3 Fights W - Franca (UD)
L - Maynard (UD)
W - Fisher (UD)

Frankly, I fail to see how this fight will be terribly different from Frank Edgar's fight with Gray Maynard.  Edgar should be fighting at 145 and Maynard, one of the bigger fighters at 155, muscled him around the cage en route to a decision victory.  My biggest worry with Sherk is that he continues to insist on boxing, a trend he started against B.J. Penn and continued with Tyson Griffin.  Penn outboxed him mainly behind a jab before knocking him out at the end of round three, while he won a close, but convincing decision against Griffin.

The big value, as usual, on Sherk was at the opening.  (I grabbed him at -210.)  Still, I like him for a small play at the current line.  I don't see either guy having much of an edge striking, but if Edgar does start to get the best of it, Sherk can fall back on his strength advantage and control a fight on the floor.

Comment 61 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

So I’m watching UFC Countdown, and Evans camp makes reference to Rashad’s footwork. Then the camera shows Evans “working on it” and he does exactly what I’m talking about. Steps forward with his back foot first.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 21, 2009 11:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, Countdown almost had me worried a bit, until I saw your post. As you said, trying to out-Machida Machida is not the way to go. Rashad certainly has the speed and explosiveness to overcome technique, but not Machida’s technique. I think this is Machida’s to lose.

I love me some Sexyama!

by pud333 on May 21, 2009 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s awesome seeing the UFC clearly use youtube video of Machida’s fight with Bonnar.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 21, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

WTF, UFC using Sherdog.com audio???

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 21, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe that’s why Rashad tends to slip more than average… If it is an issue, not sure it will be enough to change things. He is still quite light on his feet and makes many more adjustments in his movement than most other LHWs.

Another thing, I would tend to believe that it is intentional. Remember that Rashad was essentially a blank slate when he came off of TUF. Someone had to teach him, and things like the ability to sit down on punches came from somewhere. I think it actually benefits Rashad to move this way as it allows him more mobility and sudden change of direction – he can also come to a quick stop to throw a combination similar to a power stop in basketball. Also think of how runners in the NFL cut – If you want to go right, you plant and drive off of your left foot (unless you are Barry Sanders). In any event, Rashad has very active feet and he has very good mobility in all directions.

Still, it will be interesting to see if your theory holds true and Rashad starts tripping all over himself or overshooting in trying to cut Machida off.

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m sorry, but I think the Liddell plan is a really decent plan for Rashad against Machida.

Let’s face it, Machida isn’t going to chase Rashad down and Rashad can afford to chase Lyoto down.

I think we all know how this is going to end up.

If I was Machida’s coach, I would suprise everyone (including Jackson) and have Lyoto be extremely aggressive.

by aicdan2000 on May 21, 2009 11:49 PM EDT reply actions  

1. How’s Rashad going to win if Lyoto peppers him for five rounds without landing much in return?

2. Machida is the favorite going into this fight and his style and flummoxed EVERY single one of his opponents. Why would he abandon that gameplan and replace with it with something extremely risky that falls into Evans’ strong counter-punching?

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 21, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

best bet

So Mike, do you think Machida is the best bet on the main card? I think Sherk is the safest pick, so which fighter is less likely to lose Saturday?

by mo dogg on May 22, 2009 12:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, I still think Machida’s the best bet on the card even with the well-adjusted lines. If I could be guaranteed that Sherk fights smart, I might like that more, but I’m still worried he stands for 15 minutes and has me losing hair.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 22, 2009 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Could a fighter be so stupid as to abandon his bread & butter just to please fans (plus take damage & risk getting KO’d a la BJ Penn fight)? I hope Sherk boxes a little but throws Edgar around like a bigger wrestler is supposed to.

by frickshun on May 22, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did he take his Gurgelitis vaccine shot?

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.

by iiowyn on May 22, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right now, Machida and Sherk on the best bets. A week ago, I would have said Pat Barry. Just go watch some of Hague’s fights, and you’ll quickly realize he fucking HATES people who kick him in the legs. He is visibly running from the guys who do it.

Barry was a lot lower a week ago. Good thing I got in early.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on May 22, 2009 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hate four man parlays but Machida, Sherk, Hughes, and Barry will be making an appearance on my betting slips this weekend.

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on May 22, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

With a little Dan Miller thrown in for spice

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on May 22, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

As much as I think Lyoto will win...

betting against Rashad is kind of like… well, like bad. Not for nothing but the guy has constantly overcome odds…

He won TUF outside of his weight.
Liddel was gonna kick his ass.
Forrest was gonna kick his ass.

So, I want and hope Lyoto wins but there’s no way I could put money against Rashad at this point. And in the end – I am soooo looking forward to this fight.

by mythbuster on May 22, 2009 1:00 AM EDT reply actions  

If someone does the research and can articulate why they think Rashad is good value here, more power to them. However, just saying things like “I can’t put money against Rashad because he beat Liddell and Forrest as underdogs” doesn’t do anything. It’s the same argument people made betting against Randy in the Lesnar fight. In addition, Rashad’s also the guy who drew Ortiz because of a point deduction and won a split decision against a guy who’s fighting at 185 now.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 22, 2009 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not to bet against someone when they’re the underdog is terrible reasoning, but I also believe holding close decisions from an inferior version of Rashad is poorly reasoned as well. What does it matter that he couldn’t handily beat his opponents when he was a far lesser fighter? Going into this fight, what matters now is his current level of ability. Sure, he didn’t rematch either and then beat them handily to erase those “blemishes” on his record, but is there any doubt that he would have won by stoppage/UD if he faced them as anything near the fighter he currently is?

What you’re doing is akin to holding Anderson Silva’s loss to Ryo Chonan against him before he faced Rich Franklin.

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 3:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

You’re missing the point of what I’m saying.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 22, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Has Rashad really looked that great in his last few fights to tell you he has improved? Flash K.O. of Chuck (I’m of the belief that those kind of fights tell you very little about a fighter) and a win over Forrest through landing a big shot after losing rounds one and two.

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on May 22, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is why you have to watch closely. You will see a clear difference between the fighter vs. Liddell/Forrest and the one vs. Tito/Bisping. The skill difference is especially evident in the standup game, even his conditioning is much improved.

He is still less aggressive than he could be early on and that may lead to him giving away rounds, but it is risky and vs. Chuck and Forrest both there was a clear purpose – to understand their power, technique and timing (and to piss off Chuck). That is different than just being nervous and tentative.

Boiling his fight with Liddell down to one punch is a big mistake people are making – he bloodied Chuck in R1 (though people think Chuck won that round), and was handily winning R2. He lost R1 to Forrest, R2 was close, and then owned R3.

Vs. Chuck – striking stats:

Rashad – 45/98 – 46%
Chuck – 24/114 – 21%

Subtract the KO punch and Rashad is still clearly beating Liddell by landing 44/97 with 45% accuracy.

Fightmetric scoring:
R1 – Griffin 36, Evans 27
R2 – Griffin 80, Evans 70
R3 – Griffin 7, Evans 144

R1 and 2 would be considered round losses, but much closer than people would have you think – Fightmetric calls any round within 4-5 points a draw so you can see that these rounds were pretty close (9 and 10 points).

Rashad is constantly undersold – people make it seem as though he is losing fights badly when he is actually quite close and not taking significant damage or getting tired. The fights were close until he decided he was ready to make his move and comfortable enough to press the action. Once he did, he dominated both fights (wish fightmetric would do the in-depth report to show the R1 vs R2 split vs. Chuck, it’d show how easily Rashad was landing in R2).

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

I don’t agree with you but I appreciate your well thought out responses. Nice post.

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on May 22, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure putting Chuck in a coma for 2 minutes is the opposite of a flash KO.

by Hardcharger on May 22, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, first is that Rashad has a great chin, great power, great speed and agility, and is facing a guy who has not shown to be a finisher or who has a lot of power on the feet. That gives Rashad 5 rounds to end a fight. Sure, Machida is very elusive, hard to hit, and hasn’t been beaten. But this is a major step up in competition for Machida, and a different style of opponent.

by Hardcharger on May 22, 2009 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just looking at the past history, Rashad has never won a unanimous decision in the UFC, Machida has never lost a round in the UFC.

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.

by iiowyn on May 22, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

I still don’t understand how his fight against Imes was a split decision – he clearly won that fight

"My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions." --George W. Bush, The Decider, Lancaster, Pa., Oct. 3, 2007

by lovingmma25 on May 22, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dunno…I am more impressed that Imes has won by gogoplata…twice.

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.

by iiowyn on May 22, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rashad by kimura

think about it

I dislike Matt Hughes.

by MonkeyCHops on May 22, 2009 1:31 AM EDT reply actions  

I like the way you think. Rashad should work that half-guard.

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 4:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Another argument I’d make is that Rashad has the ability to win a fight even if he is losing handily. Power can be the great equalizer and erase a number of mistakes (see Carwin/GG). Add in quickness on top of that power and it does make the big shot more likely over time. Can a fight where the underdog is live for the entirety be such a lock?

The best way for Machida to stop Rashad from landing a big shot would be to put him down early(obviously?). I would think the increased risk is worth it, as trying to “outpoint” Rashad over 5 rounds is doable but far riskier than running a gassed Ortiz around the octagon for 3 rounds. Ortiz is pretty tame once you get past the first round, but Rashad would likely be a continual threat even while being unsuccessful for the moment.

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 4:01 AM EDT reply actions  

I think the best way for Machida to stop the big shot would be to close the distance and work for a trip to take the fight to the ground.

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on May 22, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

We have seen Rashad gas pretty bad in previous fights. If this fight goes past 2 rds, I expect the same. Machida’s ability to stifle opponents w/his “elusiveness” means Rashad will most likely not land that big bomb to end the fight. I like Rashad but he’s had a very favorable set of opponents to get to that belt. I would still put him as a dog against many of the top LHW. Hanging around waiting to land a big shot is not a recipe for a long title reign. Funny how nobody mentions his insanely overrated wrestling any more…

by frickshun on May 22, 2009 9:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Rashad has had an easy road to the belt? LOL at that. His road has been more difficult than Machida’s, by a stretch.

Rashad just fought the biggest, best conditioned LHW who also happens to have the highest output rate, and he didn’t gas, and won by brutal stoppage late in Rd 3. And he didn’t gas. Rashad can play Machida’s point fighting style for 5 rounds easily.

How each guy’s cardio responds if there’s a lot of TD attempts, scrambles, in addition to striking, is the question.

by Hardcharger on May 22, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who said "easy"?

I said “favorable”. Meaning they were good style matchups. Rashad can definitely “play point fighting” for 5 rounds……..AND F_CKING LOSE 50-45. He was losing that game against Forrest. And Machida makes it tougher to score than Griffin. And I agree about Machida’s road to the belt. My point is that he has truly impressed me on the way. Rashad has too but Machida has greater potential based on his skillset & background. Plus, I’ve never seen Machida “struggle” like Rashad to get wins (‘cept maybe against BJ). Let’s see Rashad face a top BJJ guy. Oh that’s right, he hasn’t been put in w/anybody like that!

by frickshun on May 22, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who did you have in mind for top BJJ guy? I’ll await your response.

Rashad has had more struggles because he’s less experienced and fought tougher guys. His potential is as high or higher than anyone at LHW.

I mentioned Rashad playing point fighting in regards to conditioning. We don’t know how Machida’s cardio can hold up if the pace is fast. He gassed against Ortiz.

by Hardcharger on May 22, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

re: Machida/Ortiz

It’s been reported that Machida had the flu during the fight.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 22, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

You realize Rashad has more fights than Machida?

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.

by iiowyn on May 22, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

The record fluctuates, sometimes Rashad is 18-0-1, sometimes 13-0-1, sometimes something like 9-0-1.

Who has had more fights is not really the point.. Even up to the point Rashad was on TUF, he was essentially a wrestler with fast hands but weak boxing skills. Machida had been training his arts since his youth including Sumo since 7-8 (says the countdown show). So if you considered their skills from the time of TUF, Rashad (less skilled) has had to advance rather rapidly to bring himself up to Machida’s level (more skilled).

Rashad is more of the late bloomer while Machida came into MMA late even though his skills were already developed.

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

From what I understand, Rashad is 16-0-1 as a professional, and 2-0 as an amateur.

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.

by iiowyn on May 22, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sherdog has him at 13-0-1 and I usually trust their ledgers, especially with known guys.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 22, 2009 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

The TUF fights were sanctioned that season only, and I am taking his record information from Fightmatrix.

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.

by iiowyn on May 22, 2009 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

iirc

None of the TUF fights (except the finale) are officially counted because fights have to be live (results immediately known), instead of being delayed.

I seem to recall them saying that after the first season. They spent the whole season saying that the fights would count on their record, and at the end said due to the above, they would not.

by mythbuster on May 23, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you don't think Machida will win...

Bet on Rashad. It’s as simple as that.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on May 22, 2009 10:08 AM EDT reply actions  

I wish Machida was -250 or -300.. Still waiting to place my Shad bet

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

And actually...

I still think Gusmao is the best value on the card by far. Machida is a very good value for how good he is, but I think people are sleeping on Gusmao. Soszynski isn’t close to as explosive as Jones is, and Gusmao did decent against Jon Jones, albeit he was getting crushed in some of the exchanges by Jones’ wild standup.

-155 for Gusmao is what I took him at. I think that’s solid big bet value. Of course, I could eat my words, but I don’t see where Soszynski excels at all over Gusmao.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on May 22, 2009 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

I put a decent chunk on Gusmao at +100 in the early going. The only way I see this ending in favor of Soszynski is if Gusmao lets this match devolve into an amateur kickboxing match. And even then it would be a stretch.

by Ahhhoki on May 22, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I’m in complete agreeance. Even if it becomes a kickboxing matchup, Gusmao is quicker in my mind. I don’t think he can put the Muay Thai clinch on Soszynski very easily, but it’s possible. He’s still the more explosive striker though.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on May 22, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

You convinced me to add him to my full card parlay

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on May 22, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

K-Sos

Well, here’s his gameplan:

Against Gusmao, he expects strong kicks and a dangerous ground game, although he thinks the Brazilian jiu-jitsu black belt’s "hands are weaker than his kicks." Soszynski freely admits his game plan is to stand.

"Oh, absolutely. Anytime you go against a BJJ black belt, you want to test his hands first. You want to test him on the feet. And that’s obviously the game plan first is test him on the feet. See what happens there. And if the opportunity comes for me to get it to the ground, I will go there if I have to, no worries."

via Pro MMA Radio and MMAMania.com

People forget he’s a BJJ Black Belt, but his Muay Thai is very good. Kickboxing him to death probably won’t work. Good luck, K-Sos

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on May 22, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Was thinking Gusmao is an okay call given the odds. Soszynski probably wouldn’t last three rounds with Jon Jones and he probably won’t with Andre either. Gusmao hustles on his feet and K-Sos puts too much faith in his stand up abilities. If you mean Andre has a BJJ belt here, then I’m much more confident in that bet.

by toughaintenough on May 22, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Jones fight gave me a lot of insight into Gusmao. It was unknown how well his chin could take punishment, and if he had the gas to go late rounds and still fight effectively. He answered both those questions there.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on May 22, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

A win by Evans or Sherk is going to ruin alot of peoples’ nights.

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 12:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Sherk?

Do mean hurt people’s feelings or their bets? I fully expect Sherk to win that fight the way Maynard beat Edgar. Are a lot of people picking Edgar to upset?

by frickshun on May 22, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did I say Sherk, I meant Serra. Oh, and bettingwise.

by bigweeze on May 22, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t like the show boating Evans does. But a fight result will never ruin my night.

I am not much of a Sherk fan but I think he’s #2 at 155. He will kill anyone not named BJ at 155. When you look at his record he is a STUD.

by Riney on May 22, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

DREAM tournaments

Sorry this is off topic but i didn’t see anything about this yet. the odds went up today for the Dream tournaments, and i was wondering if Leland or Fagan would write or comment about them. I took Mousassi at +220 for the Super Hulk and Kid Yamamoto at -130.

by mo dogg on May 22, 2009 2:51 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ll post a preview this weekend. Already have a few paragraphs written.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on May 22, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

great. Thanks a lot and looking forward to it

by mo dogg on May 22, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gusmao’s down to -130 on Bodog, and Leland’s thoughts combined with others who I respect make me think it’s an obvious play at this point.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on May 23, 2009 1:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Small
Yuki Kondo
Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support
Warrior_small
MMA Transaction Wire: February 4-10
Bv_small
BE Trivia Night

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings