Sarah Kaufman and Miesha Tate Put on Great Fight in Spite of Three-Minute Rounds
In catching up on some MMA that I missed this weekend, I decided to view the Tate vs. Kaufman bout from the Strikeforce Challenger Series (the match that was originally supposed to be Tate vs. Couture). What I observed was a great back-and-forth battle between an excellent striker in Kaufman and a more than formidable wrestler in Tate. Of course, both women have more tools in their respective tool kits, but the contrasting strengths of each woman helped make the fight.
Sarah Kaufman ended up taking the first and third rounds en route to a clear decision victory. It looked as if she had Tate in trouble in the first, but the Strikeforce veteran was able to hang tough though she was clearly overmatched in the standing game. Round two saw Tate take Kaufman down and use her superior wrestling to gain positional control and inflict a bit of damage. Of the two, Sarah Kaufman is the more well-rounded, dangerous mixed martial artist at this point in time. However, Miesha Tate looks to have a lot of upside. Kaufman displayed a fantastic sprawl, but Tate was still able to take the Canadian down several times during the nine minute bout.
One negative aspect of the match that stuck with me has long been a legitimate criticism of the way that some promotions conduct the female matches, and that is the ridiculous use of three-minute rounds instead of five-minute ones. The entire broadcast team - Mauro Ranallo, Pat Miletich and Stephen Quadros - expressed displeasure with this practice. One of the three even said that all the female fighters he had polled preferred the longer frames. Sarah Kaufman put her support behind five-minute rounds for women in her post-fight interview.
I don't believe this particular bout would have turned out any differently as a three five-minute round event, but that's not the point. From a fan's perspective, watching one of these compressed matches is more like watching a preview or a summary, perhaps, rather than a full MMA match filled with a heavy dose of complexity and strategy that longer rounds afford. Unless there is a physical reason which is detrimental to the competitors and/or the fight action, Strikeforce and other promotions should bow to MMA tradition and make women's rounds equal to those of the men. Personally, I don't believe such a physical barrier exists since many exciting female fights have been conducted with five-minute rounds, and many female competitors have fought numerous times at such length without any apparent physical damage. If the majority of competitors want longer rounds along with many fans, I'm not sure what the rationale is for clinging to the current abbreviated setup. It would be nice to hear what that rationale might be if it does, in fact, exist.
--Photo via www.mmaweekly.com
Part 1:
Part 2:
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Props to both women.
They need to be moved from 3 minute rounds to five minute rounds.
WOOT!
by JAYGK95 on May 17, 2009 9:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Who wouldn’t want six more minutes of that fight?
by subo on May 17, 2009 9:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1. 3 minute rounds are pure and utter horse feces.
2. Kaufman is something serious. Kaufman vs. Cyborg if Cyborg vs. Carano doesn’t happen. SLUGFEST!!!
3. Tate has a chin.
by Deo Wade on May 17, 2009 10:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
On point 2...
Sarah is great at 135, but Cyborg can’t even make 145 properly. It’s a terrible size mismatch. There’s lots of other good women at 135 that I’d love to see in against Kaufman before that happens.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on May 18, 2009 3:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is true, but I’d still like to see it.
by Deo Wade on May 18, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and on point 3...
That shot to the temple near the end of the third looked like a kill shot, just like the nasty overhand right coming out of the clinch in the first… Tate was eating shots like Cabbage. I was extremely impressed.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on May 18, 2009 3:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And yes that was a kill shot at the end of the third. It would have definitely been the deathblow if they were 5 minute rounds. Damn this 3 Minute round crap.
by Deo Wade on May 18, 2009 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Congratulations BloodyElbow!!!!
You have posted an article about women’s MMA that did not mention Gina Carano or Cyborg Santos
by Flyghtt on May 17, 2009 10:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that is awesome!!
war 5 min rounds!!!
"I’m not going to stop yelling because that would mean, I lost the fight!"-Kenny Powers
by ekc on May 18, 2009 4:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
(the match that was originally supposed to be Tate vs. Couture)
subliminal
by Chris Nelson on May 18, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha
Nice.
"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR
by Rundownloser on May 18, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you read the post backwards it says at some point: “Join the Gina Carano nerd club. Screw Luke Thomas.”
by Cannon Jacques on May 18, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
scott coker said in a interview the calafornia commision only allows three minute rounds in female fight the nevada commision is the major allows five minute rounds
by keith133 on May 18, 2009 10:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Someone needs to slap the California commission then.
by Tonley on May 18, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You could say this for a few different issues.
"I'm AJB and I endorse this nut-puncher."
by AJB on May 18, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















