Bloody Elbow: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Entrepreneur Magazine Does Very Little Homework

Entlogo-2009_mediumAs you've probably seen already, Entrepreneur Magazine has a profile on Affliction, Tom Atencio and MMA. There's nothing particularly noteworthy about the piece except one glaring issue: the amount of homework that went into the article is alarmingly shallow. To wit:

Affliction never planned to take a jab at the fight-club crowd until last year, when it partnered up with none other than Donald Trump. At the time, the company was endorsing athletes across several disciplines (surfing, football, basketball--it even sponsors Ozzy Osbourne). But there was another market begging to be tapped. Money in hand, Atencio, 42, and his partners, Eric Foss and Clifton Chason, both 35, forged a relationship with professional boxing’s Golden Boy Promotions (owned by pay-per-view king Oscar De La Hoya) and hosted Affliction’s second MMA bout, which took place in Anaheim, California, earlier this year. The event filled more than 13,000 seats and drew in more than 100,000 paying viewers.

The widely viewed ticket wasn’t a fluke. All signs say that Affliction has even more to look forward to. MMA’s cable and pay-per-view audiences often beat TV ratings produced by pro sporting events--including baseball, NASCAR and the Stanley Cup Finals—in the coveted 18-to-34 age bracket. The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association reports that participation in martial arts, including MMA, has grown about 11 percent since 2000. And Action Sports Retailer, the popular action-sports apparel convention, added a separate MMA clothing show last September.

"There’s been tremendous growth in the MMA apparel market," says Eric Foster, president and COO of MMAjunkie.com, one of the sport’s most visited independent sites. "The companies that are successful are run by real MMA fans who understand the sport."

To Foster’s point, Affliction, whose other staffers also sport huge muscles and acres of scar tissue, has seen average annual growth of more than 300 percent in the past two years. (Foss says the company broke the $100 million revenue mark in 2008.) What’s more, says Atencio, "MMA is still in its infancy. In five to 10 years, it will explode."
...

Maybe he’s just wearing his game face, but Atencio seems as fired up to compete as a fighter entering an MMA cage. He’s quick to point out his company’s anabolic growth, including the recent unveiling of its 150,000-square-foot headquarters, which includes an MMA ring where visiting fighters can train. Affliction also plans to promote future events that could create the kind of high-profile business showdown that MMA fans love. "The UFC is threatened by us," he says. "I’m up for the challenge."

Very interesting that on the same day this article was published that Dave Meltzer reports (subscription link alert) just the opposite, namely, that there are very strong indicators Affliction's third show will be their last. Whether the clothing line does well is a separate matter, but Entrepreneur Magazine is groping for the 2006 up-and-coming MMA business story and somehow forgot to include 2009's reality. The article reeks of the faulty promises and illusory riches that come with the limitless MMA gravy train and noticeably, there is no mention of EliteXC, the IFL or BodogFight. Coincidence?

Worse, they include a small "by the numbers" feature on the website that is ostensibly in place to shed some light on just how lucrative the business of MMA actually is. Some of the stats are meaningless, others are appropriate. But what's wildly off the mark? The "take for gate receipts at an average MMA fight": $3.25 million. This is something akin to taking the wealth of street food dealers in the Bakara Market in Mogadishu, adding in Bill Gates' wealth, then finding the "average". Really reliable stats work there.

I honestly do not like bashing what exposure MMA gets beyond the shores of its own media and clearly there is still tremendous upside to the sport, but there is no place for articles that fail to perform proper due diligence before getting published or promote a reality that simply does not exist.

1 recs  |  Comment 21 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

In five to 10 years, it will explode."

I doubt it

by JoLy on Apr 29, 2009 5:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

luke

well said. rec’d

by bdw on Apr 29, 2009 5:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They act like trump and golden boy begged them to start a fight org. What happend to “The UFC kicked us out so we had no choice”? Its all bullshit.

by szucconi on Apr 29, 2009 5:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

new bullshit story every week.

“I fell off a mountain, saw a burning bush, and it told me to open a MMA company.”—Tom Atencio in 3 weeks.

by Michael Rome on Apr 29, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d be much more concerned about a lack of depth if this article appeared in Newsweek or Time magazine.

However, in thise case we should keep in mind what the magazine is about:

“Entrepreneur Media Inc. is the premier content provider for and about entrepreneurs. Our products engage and inspire every day with the advice, solutions and resources that fuel the bold and independent way entrepreneurs think.”

The Affliction piece is right in keeping with that philosophy.

by Sergio Non on Apr 29, 2009 5:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So if an entrepreneur is full of shit, then they can print it and be fine with all the crap he can think of. Knowing some owners of companies that have large revenues (large for small companies) they can be full of shit, so you are right that it is in line with there philosophy. But when you put something in print, you should fact check it. Am I right?

by szucconi on Apr 29, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Making money is making money, it is unbiased as to what kind of person you are. Nonetheless, Affliction and Tapout have all started with nothing and both are extremely successful companies now, so having a feature on either one is well deserving on this magazine, although they could have gone more into depth with it, but what do you expect, they titled it making money off a blood sport.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Apr 29, 2009 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shirts, yeah Affliction is very profitable. MMA, not so much.

by szucconi on Apr 29, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have they done a piece on TapouT?

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.

by iiowyn on Apr 29, 2009 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They reference Tapout in the article and said they were doing excellent (signed a deal with Sketchers, etc). Did you read it?

by MMASuPreMaCy on Apr 29, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A mention in this article is not a piece written about TapouT, which is a company story much more in line with their philosophy.

A man should never waste an opportunity to keep his mouth shut.

by iiowyn on Apr 29, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Making money is their Philosophy, and both have done that.

by MMASuPreMaCy on May 1, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In this economy they are getting desperate for stories.

Keep firing Assholes!
Akiyama is the Japanese word for Sexify.

by Ubernoober on Apr 29, 2009 6:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

3.5 million you say? Someone lend me 1 million, I will double your money.

by bigweeze on Apr 29, 2009 6:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

“The article reeks of the faulty promises and illusory riches that come with the limitless MMA gravy train and noticeably, there is no mention of EliteXC, the IFL or BodogFight. Coincidence?”

Luke, 80% of the article deals with the MMA apparel industry…why would EliteXC, the IFL or BodogFight even enter the discussion? While misrepresenting the whole pretext of the article as one about a UFC vs Affliction promotional battle and the folly of Afflcition’s ways does make for some red meat for folks to feast on , that isn’t what the article was about..

Mike Goldberg on robnashville:
"His analysis is so analytical"

by robnashville on Apr 29, 2009 7:03 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

I don't know.

It does focus a lot on apparel, but there’s no real delineation between that and fight promotion in the article. If there were, it should be noted just how small Affliction the fight promotion is in comparison to the UFC, so the reader can get a better sense of what the landscape is. Who am I to question a glossy magazine, though? Then, there’s the last quote where Atencio contends that the UFC is “threatened” by Affliction. I didn’t take that to mean that White is afraid of the shirts.

I can’t say that I’m a reader of Entrepreneur, but the article is probably in line with what they do. It was fluffy.

by Cannon Jacques on Apr 29, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know cannon…..leading with this paragraph…

“From blood sport of taking down the opponent with style, to winning your audience with fashion.”

and then having 80% of the article focus on apparel would lead me to believe the general gist of the article centered more on that rather than fight promotion angle….. but that wouldn’t make for a nice lead now would it…..

yeah the article was fluffy, but outside of trade journals, that is what stuff is going to be…. I’m just jealous that performafy got quoted……

Mike Goldberg on robnashville:
"His analysis is so analytical"

by robnashville on Apr 29, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I suppose the piece can be taken many different ways. I certainly can’t speak for Luke, but the conclusion I drew from what he wrote is that his main beef is with how the industry of MMA is colored. They do gloss over just how difficult it is to break into a business that has one huge player. A player that has a profound impact on most aspects of the entire sport – most notably in North America. Now, whether that reality is good, bad or somewhere in between is a question to be determined by each individual.

You can say that a fluffy piece that doesn’t address key issues, issues that very much affect Affliction as promotion and as a successful apparel company, is the best the magazine can do, or it’s the best they’re willing to do. However, I don’t think there is a decent argument to be made which contends that the article doesn’t color the situation favorably toward Affliction. Furthermore, it’s not a very accurate representation of what’s happening in the industry at the current time. On those counts, I believe Luke is correct.

“Nice lead” or not, I see merit in what he’s saying, and it’s certainly no Bloody Elbow company line. I wouldn’t back an argument that I didn’t think I could effectively defend, but I’m pretty sure I can defend this one.

by Cannon Jacques on Apr 29, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s pretty much what I got out of the article and I am not sure why people are making it that big of a deal, same with Sergio’s comment.

by MMASuPreMaCy on Apr 29, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The article doesnt split Affliction Inc and Affliction Entertainment. Collectively, Affliction is flying. Sure, there is speculation about Affliction Entertainment, but even if their 3rd event is their last, Affliction Inc will be flying with a bucketload of additional exposure over the last 12 months to push apparel sales. Atencios decision to tip his hat into the promoting arena certainly shows a bold, entrepreneurial flair and may potentially reap huge dividends if they can iron out the bugs.

The article is fine to me. It seems Affliction cant do anything right for many. Hell, Tom is over in Japan now promoting with M1 at a Deep event. Wheres the pat on the back for expanding in to other countries and attempting to gather some traction in the Japanese market? Nowhere. All we hear is how silly people think the Fedor v Aoki exhibition match is. Good on you Tom. Keep up the good work.

by GeeDub on Apr 30, 2009 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it." -- H.L. Mencken
Start posting on Bloody Elbow »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mikeeaston_small
A Conundrum About Fedor
Nav-logo-hover_small
Dan Henderson: Enormous Benefit To Strikeforce Has Parallels in World of Wrestling
Mma_spot_logo-1_small
Add Gerald Harris To The List Of Veterans Applying For TUF
Nav-logo-hover_small
Dan Henderson: Suddenly in the driver's seat in UFC negotiations
Alvarezavatar_small
CBS Commercial Ads Sold-Out for Strikeforce Fedor vs Rogers, Plus Targetting Markets and Sponsors (EA Sports, etc)

Recent FanPosts

Small
CBS/Strikeforce Broadcast Quality Unacceptable
Small
In Praise Of Jake Sheilds
Small
Omnisport Offering Live Online Stream of Strikeforce: Fedor vs. Rogers
Small
Swick Laughs Hughes Off, "It Wouldn't Even be a Fight"
Small
Thought I had re Strikeforce's marketing of Fedor:
Weo_animation2_small
Fedor Emelianenko vs Brett Rogers Will Be for the WAMMA Heavyweight Belt
Tailings_small
Dustin Hazelett Interview: ACL is good, Ready for Karo
Small
Your chance to hang with top MMA fighters
Small
Fighters should be fighters and not actors but ...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings