Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

Cheick Kongo Should Get a Title Shot

Cheick_kongo_def__a_784628a_mediumCheick Kongo should get a title shot against the winner of Brock Lesnar and Frank Mir.  There, I said it...it's out there.  I await your sarcastic comments.

Let me start by conceding that there is a lot of sound reasoning behind the idea that three wins over Evensen, Al Turk and Hardonk doesn't scream "contender."  My counter to this is simple: Kongo as a title contender is ready right now.  Shane Carwin and Cain Velasquez are better fighters on paper and probably have a better chance of winning a title fight against whoever comes out of UFC 100 as champion.  But I've always been someone who places a lot of emphasis on marketability and I also believe that development of future stars is of high importance.

Cheick Kongo has fought in the UFC nine times winning seven and losing by split decision twice.  He carries name recognition as well as one of the most impressive "looks" in the sport.  Assuming Lesnar defeats Mir in the rematch I would consider Lesnar/Kongo a license to print money based simply on the fact that it appeals to the basest elements of human interest.  People like to see two huge men fight.  A simple ad of the two men staring each other down is going to generate plenty of buzz with the casual fanbase which is the driving force of PPV success.

This isn't to suggest that Shane Carwin or Cain Velasquez aren't huge physical specimens in their own rights but both could use more time and exposure to hit their peak value.  A title fight featuring Carwin could be huge in a year if he can get one or two more impressive performances on TV.  Right now it's a fight that is carried entirely by whoever the champion is with a little bit of "future star" buzz for Carwin.  In a year it could be a mega fight featuring two legitimate superstars.  It's the same story for Velasquez.

Kongo is likely at his peak in terms of marketability.  While he has developed a strong top game I don't trust that he has anything to give off his back and it is only a matter of time until someone puts him there for three rounds and takes away that marketability like the setback that happened with Marrero in '06.  I believe in resourceful use of commodities and Kongo is the perfect guy for the champion to "stay busy" against while allowing Carwin and Velasquez to become real stars and make sure their title shots draw big money.

To top it off Cheick is a good test for both Mir (who has proven that he can get busted up on the feet and by someone with a strong top based GnP game), or Lesnar (who still needs to have his chin tested by someone with top level striking power).

I guess what I'm pushing for is for the UFC to use Kongo while he has high value, give the two future stars time to develop into big draws and testing the champion with a tough fight that is an easy sell.  It just doesn't seem that complicated to me.

Comment 86 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Totally agree with the ‘business’ view that no is the right time for Kongo to get a title shot. And, in the ‘sport’ sense, the only other guy who should even be in discussion for a title shot right now is Carwin.

The fact that Kong and Carwin are the only two guys in the division anyone is talking about getting a title shot kind of tells you that the supposed ‘depth’ at heavyweight isn’t really there right now.

by McEwen on Apr 20, 2009 6:37 PM EDT reply actions  

On that note...

I bet he would have an easier time gettin a title-shot if he called himself Cheick “King” Kongo instead. He could make some killer entrances using that stagename. Maybe carry a screamin` girl on the way to the ring? Or maybe be accompanied by a dwarf to make him look reaally really huge? And do a double-fist-pounding instead of that heart-point-to-the-air thingy he does. The possibilities are ENDLESS! Best entrance in the UFC, even counting Gono`s entrances…

"They called him the axe-murderer because he was murdering chumps. They should have been calling him the chump-murderer..." Rampage Jackson (commentating on the fighting abilities of Wanderlei "F#ck Chuck" Silva.)

by BlueberryMuffin on Apr 21, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Makes too much sense

Probably because you posted this on the Non-Media Interwebs Dana will be forced to disagree.

by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 6:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Also...

just to be clear I was working on this before Leland’s article was posted. I didn’t do this as a dick move to undercut his article with my own going against his premise.

….or did I?

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 6:41 PM EDT reply actions  

I have been working on a book about a teenage wizard since 1993.

I dislike Matt Hughes.

by MonkeyCHops on Apr 20, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m all for opposing viewpoints, after all, that’s the point of opinion writing.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on Apr 20, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Of course the one argument against Kongo is the possibility of him crushing their HW golden goose. Yes, there is money involved in the sequel but what would happen if the sequel turned out to be a repeat? UFC would probably have to go shopping for another big draw cause Randy can’t beat a striker like Kongo.

by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 6:43 PM EDT reply actions  

If Kongo wins...

he remains marketable…the former champ (I assume Lesnar) will get to fight back toward a rematch, Carwin and Velasquez will still get to fight for a title, this time against Kongo. I don’t think the downside is too extreme really

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree that Kongo would remain marketable as champ. No one ever complains about the entertainment factor of a Kongo fight. I’m questioning whether the UFC brass can embrace a HW title match up possibly going from 1 million PPV buys back down to 500k-600k under a Kongo rein? Perspectives tend to change when money is flooding in. With Anderson Silva killing his marketability and Chuck retiring this past weekend Zuffa might be worrying about a bottom line.

by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

but I don’t think anyone at HW can keep up with Lesnar buyrates. They’ve got to give SOMEONE a shot.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kongo might not have Lesner’s marketability (who does?) but he’s right behind Lesner. There is a reason why the UFC has been giving Kongo winnable fights. He looks like the guy the average person would think was the best fighter in the world (think Kimbo only with legit skills and a more imposing/athletic physique).

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on Apr 20, 2009 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brent usually I agree with you but I think giving Kongo a shot would only pad Mir or Lesnar’s record I understand he has a lot of wins in the UFC but as a fighter I don’t think he is good enough to fight for the title

by drano on Apr 20, 2009 6:52 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Kongo posses a significant challenge fto both Mir and Lesnar. Mir’s gotten his head kicked in a couple times in the past and Brock’s never had his chin tested. It would be intriguing and wouldn’t circle a win for any fighter.

by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just don’t see it man I’m sorry kongo doesn’t seem well rounded enough to get through a fight with either fighter when he shot for the takedown with Herring it put some serious questions about his standup in my mind

by drano on Apr 20, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Kongo so I don’t want to see him get killed by Brock Lesnar (assuming he beats Mir). For selfish reasons I want to see Kongo beat up jobbers and tomato cans for as long as he’s physically able.

Yeah, who got the final Death Blow? 'Cause I thought that Hawaiian guy had it comin' to him. - C. K.

by monkeyfightclub! on Apr 20, 2009 6:58 PM EDT reply actions  

It is kind of fun isn't it?

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

He lost to Herring and hasn't beat anyone good.....

I think we over value “winning in the UFC.” The guys Kongo has beaten were over the hill Cro Cop and B level fighters. Herring showed us a HUGE hole in Kongo’s game. His wrestling is horrible, and Cain, Carwin, Lesnar, Mir and Nog would all slaughter Kongo.

I agree that his value is probably as high as it’s going to get, but I don’t think he is deserving of a title shot right now.

by Dexerion on Apr 20, 2009 6:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Keep it in your pants, skippy.

"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR

by Rundownloser on Apr 20, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah\...

I’m not going to argue with that. I don’t expect everyone to agree on this one. I just think giving it to him now, let him (probably) lose and then let the green guys (who should now be more marketable) get their time in the sun.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Better than the title fights the middle weight division has given us. Id watch.

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on Apr 20, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anyone else want to see the fallout if Kongo knees Lesnar in the groin? I’m now very curious…

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Apr 20, 2009 6:59 PM EDT reply actions  

At least Sable has one bun in the oven already.

by bigweeze on Apr 20, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does Kongo deserve it, no, but is it good in terms of a marketable fight, yes

From the business sense, this is a very marketable fight. If Kongo wins, he is always marketable but not nearly as Lesnar, so it could be a loss (Lesnar will sell ppvs no matter what though). I don’t think that Kongo deserves a Title shot, but from a marketing standpoint and just seeing a very fresh matchup in Lesnar vs Kongo, I can see the reasoning for it.

by chrisbboy82 on Apr 20, 2009 7:05 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree with the reasoning behind pushing for a Kongo title match. Carwin and Velasquez are very good, but still sort of green. Sure, Brock is green too in a way, but if an up and coming prospect is thrown into the big title fight too early, it could potentially ruin said prospect. So yeah, Kongo is good. (I realize that Brock goes against the grain, but that’s Brock. He’s a monster.)

by pud333 on Apr 20, 2009 7:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Carwin and Velasquez are very good, but still sort of green.

But the key point, which Brent made, is that they’re particularly green in terms of drawing power. Both of these guys could, and should become decent draws because of their talent/size/casual fan appeal/etc., but need more eyeballs on their performances for it to become a reality. It’s quite likely that the UFC is grooming these 2 for big things, and the Kongo proposal gives them more time to do just that.

So I agree with the reasoning that a Kongo title shot makes good sense from a business perspective (on multiple levels that Brent outlines), though I don’t think he’s at the top of the pecking order based on merit. However merit is rarely the only qualification for getting a title shot (e.g. Lesnar and Couture both getting their respective initial title shots, as well as Mir for that matter), so this is a moot point.

by Estrada on Apr 20, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

The groin shot reputation is what leans me away from it. Kongo ’ accidentally’ kneed CroCop 3 times, and that knee to Al Turks jewels was retaliatory. And would someone please tell him how to pronounce title, in English, properly. His annunciation of everything else is accurate, except this one word.

by bubbafat on Apr 20, 2009 7:07 PM EDT reply actions  

please tell him how to pronounce title, in English, properly.

What’s the importance again? Was this a huge issue with Arlovski? Does it matter that GSP pronounces the word ‘fight’ as the world ‘f*ck’ (see Inside MMA for a hilarious gaff). Chuck wasn’t an English major, we know Tito definitely wasn’t.

by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

hugely hugely important

It makes people cringe when they hear him say ‘give me a teetle shot’.

Imagine he wins and becomes the ‘teetle-holder’!!?

by rainmaker6 on Apr 20, 2009 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hell no. That’s his thing, for gods sake. At least he has a bit of personality as opposed to Cain and Shane. The dude is crazy and should freaking coach on TUF AFAIC. But I suspect I’m in minority on this one…

by ununkvadrium on Apr 21, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

The “i” in French is pronounced “ee” – many francophonie make that mistake in English.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Apr 20, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

“teetle” is way, way better anyway

by Chris Nelson on Apr 20, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kongo vs Vanilla Gorilla has $$$ written all over it

"If I wanted to spend a half hour between two hairy legs I'd go to your mother's house." -Don Frye

by Pitbull on Apr 20, 2009 7:08 PM EDT reply actions  

The next title shot is Randy’s if he wins… end of discussion.

by mmalogic on Apr 20, 2009 7:26 PM EDT reply actions  

He’s UFC not so perfect ex-girlfriend that they can’t get rid of because they’ve never been able to find anything better.

by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man...

If Lesnar wins his career is made up of FAR too many rematches (2 rematches is a lot for such a short career) if that is true

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I’d like to see Lesnar fight someone other than Mir or Randy, but then again, Randy ain’t getting any younger.

by pud333 on Apr 20, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sequels to successful originals are no brainers. Especially when one of the lead actors has only so many left in him.

by mmalogic on Apr 20, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why is that an issue? Both rematches make sense, Lesnar-MIr is unifying the title, and a potential Lesnar-Couture rematch, if it comes about, would happen because Randy earned it.

by andherewego on Apr 20, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not an issue...

so much as I just want to see how Lesnar fares against other fighters/skillsets..etc.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s called not killing the golden goose.

by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

FYI

We’ve always thought you were a Zuffa/UFC plant. Funny how all your intel always involves a connection to Xtreme Couture.

by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 7:33 PM EDT reply actions  

I assume that...

was a reply to logic and not to me right?

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would really like to disagree with you Brent, but I cannot think of anybody else in the heavyweight division that is desevering. Maybe the winner of Randy vs. Nog. Carwin is going to be out of action for awhile with the broken nose, Velasquez if he can get by Herring will be a legit contender but until he beats Heath you can’t metion him in that category. Other than that I cant think of anybody else who is deserving of a title shot. The only thing i can think of is that if Lesnar wins we could see an instant rubber match.

by Matt13 on Apr 20, 2009 7:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Love it

And the winner gets the winner of Randy-Big Nog. By that time either Cain or Carwin will be ready. Seems like a great set-up for 2008 and the first half of 09.

"Japan is half-Machida" - iiowyn

by Day Man on Apr 20, 2009 8:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Is this controversial?

I was surprised Brent was so trepidatious because I thought this was just understood. The only other option would be Kongo vs. Carwin, with the winner getting a shot. Who else is really in the hunt that would make this an edgy call? Dana has clearly been building to Brock Vs. Kongo in a superheavyweight clash.

"It's like a flying knuckle sandwich." --Rogan
"And many men have eaten it." -- Goldy

by thetakeover on Apr 20, 2009 8:22 PM EDT reply actions  

I can’t really see Kongo as deserving of a title shot. He’s fought two guys of note Herring and Crocop, he lost to Herring who isn’t exactly a perenial contender. Its slightly impressive he beat Crocop but I’ve always felt that was tainted by the rather repeated blows he landed to Mirko’s family jewels. I’d rather see Kongo get at least one more win over some of note before he gets a tightle shot. I wouldn’t mind seeing Kongo versus Gonzaga, if Kongo can take him out then yea give him a shot at the title.

by ChrisBat on Apr 20, 2009 8:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Question

Since when does “deserve” have anything to do with getting a title shot? We have had a few fighters get cracks at different belts when they hardly merited it at the time.

Getting a title shot, for right or wrong, usually has more to do with generating revenue than someone deserving it.

by Farthammer on Apr 20, 2009 8:44 PM EDT reply actions  

13 feet and 550 lbs of combat

Remember Lennox Lewis vs. Bruce Seldon? Hyped at 14 feet and 500 lbs going at it in the ring? They sold that fight based on the size mystique and it was a total bust (should say Seldon was a bust….) Don’t know if Kongo is quite to that level of contender yet, and the last thing we need or more lopsided and lackluster title fights a la Anderson Silva of late. ChrisBat’s idea of Kongo vs Gonzaga makes perfect sense as a last-step to title shot fight.

by Fooshnickens on Apr 20, 2009 8:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Well yeah...

they also did that with Lewis and Grant. The trick is…no one really ever cared about Lennox and big men in boxing don’t QUITE have the mystique of big men in MMA. Otherwise the Klitschkos would be as big of a draw as anyone in combat sports.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well they used to

But it’s just Lewis was never really a draw….I have no idea why (he was less popular in the UK than the much less skilled Frank Bruno).

Mainly big ‘Americans’ are draws in the US. But not randoms from other countries. This applies to boxing. If Kongo wins then we’ll see if it applies to MMA as well.

by rainmaker6 on Apr 20, 2009 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree 100%. And if he does happen to become champion then I don’t see that as a bad thing. It actually creates a deeper heavyweight division.

by dedstrk316 on Apr 20, 2009 8:59 PM EDT reply actions  

ManBearPig needs someone to clobber untill Shane & Cain are ready.

Keep firing Assholes!

by Ubernoober on Apr 20, 2009 9:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Disagreed... although

The reasoning behind your decision is at least legitimate. Kongo’s look and marketability is definitely there. In terms of marketability, I think you’re right that he has peaked.

But I’m still coming from a stance that I want to see deserving fighters at the top, not guys with the “look” and marketability. I realize that this is the UFC and marketability is everything however, so I can get behind the idea, but I disagree that it SHOULD happen. I think Kongo needs to fight another legitimate opponent.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on Apr 20, 2009 9:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah...

but I think the case can be made that Kongo is much more deserving than Carwin or Velasquez. I guess the Randy/Nog winner is more deserving but Kongo isn’t far off.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 20, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be perfectly honest, Velasquez really isn’t even on the radar in my mind. I mean, look at his record and the strength of his opponents. It seems that the UFC is building him up much like Huerta.

This entire discussion is making me believe that the division really is lacking.

Follow my analysis of all things MMA on BloodyElbow.com

by Leland Roling on Apr 20, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

The division is...

the old (Randy/Nog), the future (Lesnar, Carwin, Velasquez, Dos Santos), the now (mir, Lesnar…yeah he fits in both), the middle of the road maxed out guys (Kongo, Herring)

It’s promising but as for guys that are ready RIGHT NOW? Yeah, it’s thin.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 21, 2009 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Straight up

Would love to see Kongo fight Brock. If Mir wins, then I don’t really mind who the next challenger is, although Carwin wouldn’t be a bad choice. Here are the matchups I believe are saleable:

If Brock wins (they should be in this order)
- Brock-Kongo
- Brock-Randy
- Brock-Carwin
- Brock-Mir III

If Mir wins:
- Mir-Randy/Nog winner
- Mir-Carwin

Actually thinking about it, if Mir wins the UFC is a lot more fuct because none of Mir’s fights are very marketable. Mir is a great champ and pretty marketable himself but the ‘fight’ itself isn’t intriguing. With Brock vs Kongo or Carwin it’s more like..‘the biggest dudes on the planet’ type thing. It’s a King Kong vs Godzilla showdown.

With Mir it’s still ‘martial arts’ so I guess the better fight would be a legit martial artist i.e. Randy or Nog.

by rainmaker6 on Apr 20, 2009 10:04 PM EDT reply actions  

The Parisain Vs. the Norwegian

of course it makes sense. Far weaker competitors have been given a shot at the heaveweight strap. I think the decision to Herring was questionable and in any event his kicked ass since that point. He has way more octogon time than my dog Carwin and beat down artisit Cain V. The fact that he has an advantage in a significant area of fighting (kick boxing and wrestling) over Mir and Lesner (kick boxing) also illustrate the validity of his selection.

by naturalist on Apr 20, 2009 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

kongo vs gonzaga

i was sitting here watching ufc 96, and as i was watching gonzaga get the most furious 6 inch punch right to the face, i thought to myself…..the only other person i could stand to see gonzaga fight is kongo. Yes if kongo were to win, i think he should get a title shot. But on the opinion of marketing fighters……as if they are pawns or something heh heh heh, kongo would HAVE to win. A striker fighting a bjjer could end up a number of ways, but gonzaga seems like he is a little too emotional and can let the situation get the better of him. if gonzaga has the game plan of take down-to-submission, then gonzaga wins, if he wants to prove a point and/or feel overly confident, kongo by knockout. So this makes kongo vs gonzaga intriguing, somewhat meaningful, and in my opinion would be huge on name alone, headlining a FIGHT NIGHT or a co-main event

good luck in life!

by georgehouse on Apr 21, 2009 12:02 AM EDT reply actions  

I can get behind this

I don’t think Kongo deserves a title shot…but under these circumstances/understanding, I’d go along with it…keeps the younger/developing stars marketable and gives the teetle holder someone to fight until the big money match. Is this sort of what they did with Timmah and Monson? Monson had a few wins under his belt, but nothing terribly impressive in caliber. I don’t remember who Sylvia fought next, but it could have been a similar situation.

by Dabashire on Apr 21, 2009 12:34 AM EDT reply actions  

I admit that I scoffed it at first. But now I think, hey, why not? It’s probably better than having no title fight at all, and it’s also better than throwing some dude who still needs to improve and build himself up. So yep, do it. I like the logic here. It’ll probably be entertaining, and it’s about time he bang with another big dude. Plus, I think he has a decent chance against Lesnar.

by Dooda on Apr 21, 2009 12:53 AM EDT reply actions  

I know alot of people are talking about who the most “marketable challenger is” but really that doesn’t seem to have much bearing in Middleweight unless your name is Yushin Okami then the UFC just hates you so your out of luck. Whomever gets the next shot will suddenly be pumped up as the UFC blows sunshine up our asses claiming they’re a valid challenger.

I figure that Nog/Couture’s winner is likely to get the next crack at the belt once Mir/Lesnar settle things. To me it makes sense to have Kongo fight someone legit in the interm in order to see if he’s ready for a crack at the belt. My earlier suggestion was Gonzaga, but I’m sure other names could be floated. I’m just not impressed with Kongo’s can stomping.

by ChrisBat on Apr 21, 2009 1:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Kongo is 3-1 against grapplers in the UFC, his loss coming from a mediocre Heath Herring while his wins are against a woefully undersized Marerro, a fat and lazy Assuerio and Mustafa.

Al-Turk was a good start, but if he’s going to be facing Brock or Mir he needs to prove himself against a grappler at the lower tier like Carwin, Gonzaga, Nog, Couture or Cain. I’d even toss McCully in there but he’s gotten really small for the division.

No doubt his striking and ground and pound are solid though.

by George Lucas on Apr 21, 2009 2:32 AM EDT reply actions  

marrero beat kongo and exposed his wrestling as crap, dogg.

by nigelzackit on Apr 21, 2009 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

...in 2006

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 21, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Let him fight Shane Carwin and go from there. Carwin destroys him with ease, in my opinion, which will make me very happy.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill

by FlyByKnight on Apr 21, 2009 4:29 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think Kongo deserves a title shot yet…..I’d like to see him fight once more. Either Kongo/ Gonzaga or Kongo/ Carwin sound like great match ups. Who ever wins the Couture/ Nog fight should face the winner of Mir/Lesnar first then Kongo should get a shot if he can beat whoever he’s matched up with……… with that being said i do think that a Kongo/Lesnar match would be great. They are both huge guys with a lot of power behind them and i think the fight would be highly marketable and bring in a lot of viewers.
So it’s the question of whether Dana will give the fight to who deserves it more or who’s going to sell more PPV’s…………..

by *KATIE-JANE* on Apr 21, 2009 9:04 AM EDT reply actions  

why does the internet make every dude who wins three fights in a row in the ufc into a title challenger? dude fought bums and beat them. big deal. subtract the crocop win and youre left with a muscled up kickboxer with a less impressive record than bader. maybe he should get a title shot….

by nigelzackit on Apr 21, 2009 9:51 AM EDT reply actions  

So...did you not read the article?

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 21, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

i read the article and i get what youre trying to say. but, shane carwin koed a guy that fought randy for the world title two years ago. kongo beat a guy who was a nobody in cage rage and lost to heath herring. guys who lose to heath herring typically arent guys who are ready for world title fights

by nigelzackit on Apr 21, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess...

I just don’t want to see a guy like Carwin get wasted in his title shot because he isn’t as big of a star as he could be

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 21, 2009 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

carwins no kid you know, and i remember hearing he trained part time. not to mention how quickly he got shook up and taken down by gonzaga. still he deserves it more than kongo. hes beaten good fighers. kongo hasnt.

lemme tell you what youre arguing when you take out the nice language. carwin, cain, berry, duffee, dos santos, whatever…theyre prospects. kongo was a prospect but lost a few times now to guys who arent that good. he beats guys that are generally awful and belong in m1 challenge. hell the guys that beat him belong there too. because he stopped being a prospect when he lost to marrero and herring and became a failed prospect and gatekeeper, that makes him better for a title fight than guys who are undefeated in mma or in the ufc and have better or the same wins.

by nigelzackit on Apr 21, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jesus christ man...

No Carwin isn’t young. But he isn’t a name either. I want him to get a win or two more on the main card of shows so that people outside of the hardcore know who the fuck he is and care about the fight.

So Cro Cop belongs in M1 challenge…obviously Hardonk does as well…Herring beat him but the fact that Herring is a tough, durrable fighter who has fought the best in the world his entire career should be overlooked…off to M1 with him!

It’s a good thing that Carwin has ran though a list of huge names in MMA. Gonzaga and……..um…Sherman Pendergarst looked pretty good losing in the first round at YAMMA I guess. Not to mention Carwin’s win over Wellisch…I mean Kongo could NEVER beat that guy

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 21, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

carwin isnt a name but kongo is…uhh…what? neither one is a name. the difference is that carwin hasn’t lost yet. kongo has twice to guys who aren’t top level fighters.

do i think crocop is at the level of the guys in m1 challenge? right now he sure looks it, i dunno about you. do i think hardonk is? yeah, he is dogg. hes an 8-5 fighter with no great wins. you know what makes hardonk better than rimbon or oleinik? having a ufc contract. you say herring and i laugh, since the only win keeping him in the ufc from the last 6 years is kongo. you know what makes herring better than aleks? a ufc contract.

by nigelzackit on Apr 21, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kongo is waaaaaaay more popular than Carwin

Nobody with any sense would argue that point.

I poop rainbows.

by Blackout612 on Apr 21, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

who are these people who care about kongo and where are they? ive never met them.

by nigelzackit on Apr 21, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

plus youre missing my point. sure carwin doesnt have all great wins. neither does kongo. the best dude kongo ever beat lost to the best dude carwin ever beat, and he did it now, not 2 years ago or whatever. youre arguing kongo is more ready because hes fought more and has more experience, which is like internet dude codeword for ‘he lost fights’. maybe id be impressed if he lost to really good fighters, but he didnt. i mean, what, he lost to herring whos a top fighter, right? and we know herring is still a top fighter because he beat kongo. am i getting it yet?

by nigelzackit on Apr 21, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

i too would rather see Carwin and Cain get built up before throwing them at one another or fighting Cheick. Compared to other guys who got title shots, Cheick’s fought 9 TIMES in the UFC. Fanboys were saying Carwin should fight after beating a couple no names when he first dropped into the UFC.

Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei.
http://theworldsoldestsport.blogspot.com/

by theworldsoldestsport on Apr 21, 2009 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

I have to agree. Cheick has nine fights and seven victories in his UFC career, and was passed over for a title shot in favor of a 1-1 guy, and the guy who beat that 1-1 guy. Sure they won, but what’s to say that he wouldn’t have won too, if given the opportunity. Now he’s possibly getting passed over in favor of these fresh faces, who the casual fans don’t even know yet. Cheick Kongo has been in high-profile fights before, and has never been finished, while himself had quite a few spectacular finishes. He’s marketable, and he’s capable.

That said, I’d probably say that Couture and Nogueira are more marketable and capable, and if either is particularly impressive in their fight, I’d be in favor of the winner getting the shot over Kongo, with a Kongo-Carwin winner then being an especially credible title challenger.

by madiq on Apr 21, 2009 11:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah...

I guess if the winner of Randy/Nog looks good and stays injury free they are a better option for a title shot. I’d say in order:

1) Winner of Randy/Nog if injury free
2) Kongo
3) Carwin

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 21, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hwt contenders

althought the article was well written and made some valid points,I still think that Kongo needs another win over a known fighter.I think that Kongo vs. Couture would be more interesting than BigNog vs. Randy. I don’t think that Randy will be able to finish BigNog ,but he would probably have a chance at Putting Cheick on his back and pounding him out.I could also see Cheick landing some devastaing blows to tKO Randy,so it would probably be a great fight no matter who wins.while a fight between BigNog and Randy has a pretty good chance at going to the Judges score cards,which ussally sucks.

by TheLevi on Apr 21, 2009 2:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I understand the marketability aspect...

but I don’t think you’re doing the UFC HW title or the HW division any favors by putting a guy in a title shot who hasn’t actually earned it. He needs at least one more win even in a division as thin as UFC Heavyweight.

I say put Kongo against Dos Santos, at like UFC 102. Dos Santos is a bit further along than Carwin, and Dos Santos/Kongo is all but guaranteed to be exciting. Yes, if Dos Santos wins you won’t have the most marketable challenger but he’ll have earned his shot, plus he is an exciting fighter. If Kongo wins he’ll have beaten a top 10 opponent and will be even more marketable.

by Chromium on Apr 22, 2009 9:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Small
Yuki Kondo
Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support
Warrior_small
MMA Transaction Wire: February 4-10
Bv_small
BE Trivia Night

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings