Martin Kampmann vs. Carlos Condit Deserved Fight of the Night Bonus
Okay, so lets say you have two fights on a card. Fight A is reasonably lopsided with the exception of a single deep submission attempt and has an obvious decision at the end of the fight with all three judges cards reading 30-27. Fight B is a back and forth affair featuring a mix of all the techniques that make up mixed martial arts and it too goes to the judges scorecards but this one is much closer resulting in a split decision.
Obviously when picking Fight of the Night you'd go with Fight B right? ...right? Apparently not if you're the UFC who awarded Fight of the Night honors to Tyson Griffin vs. Rafael dos Anjos rather than the main event of Martin Kampmann vs. Carlos Conditt.
Maybe it's just the nerdy "purist" in me coming out but the main event had much more drama as well as diverse techniques on display and was one of the better fights I've watched this year let alone tonight. While I can appreciate the drama of dos Anjos' deep calf cutter (at least I think that's the correct technical term) the fight was more or less dominated by Tyson's mildly sloppy striking from bell to bell. Compared to the nice transitions, deep submission attempts, clean technical striking and close rounds of Kampmann/Condit it seems that $30,000 found its way into the wrong pockets tonight.
It's a continuation of the trend toward "just stand and punch more than in the other fights and you get the bonus" that has been taking over FotN bonuses in the UFC for several events running now. There were moments where Griffin/RdA went to the ground but they were not frequent and did not last long (with the exception of the submission attempt in the first round) while the majority of the fight was stand up fighting with relatively poor technique.
In fact, the only thing I can think of that Griffin/Anjos had more of than Condit/Kampmann was time spent on the feet and that time was not nearly as crisp and technical as what took place in the main event. Griffin's new boxing happy style results in him dropping his hands when he throws power shots in a way that, barring correction, will get him KO'ed soon enough by a striker with powerful counter striking and dos Anjos' striking technique is actually much worse.
I'm sure the answer to this from a lot of our readers is going to be "Kampmann and Condit probably got a nice locker room bonus" but that's besides the point. I just want to see the UFC move away from simply awarding guys for standing and striking if it does not actually make for the best fight that took place that evening. Maybe tonight is the night that finally gets me to buy into the conspiracy theory that the UFC is trying to manufacture a specific type of style by setting up this very specific type of reward system.
0 recs |
60 comments
|
Comments
cmon man, they HAVE to pad tyson's resume!
especially since he’s back at “contender” status now.. ugh..
by Anton Tabuena on Apr 2, 2009 12:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fight of the Night is the only reward that goes to the loser to.
Don’t forget Griffin was -800 for that fight. Anjos was supposed to lose that fight, and lose it BADLY. Fending him off to a decision is a moral victory for Anjos, esp. since it was arguably a 29-28 fight. Hell, given how retarded his game plan was, I’d say Griffin stock went down a bit despite winning.
So I’d say that FOTN went to Anjos to reward him for being the lil’ train that could and not to manipulate fighters into standing (the fans have that one covered).
by toxic on Apr 2, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good point..
I say junie vs dos anjos..
junie goes to FW at WEC after, whatever happens.. then Dos anjos could be cut if he loses badly..
by Anton Tabuena on Apr 2, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Griffin vs. Dos Anjos was the epitome of a UFC Wrestleboxing fight; Condit vs. Kampmann actually resembled a technical MMA fight.
by smoogy on Apr 2, 2009 12:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Griffin vs. Dos Anjos was the epitome of a MMA Wrestleboxing fight
fixt’d
by LiuLang on Apr 2, 2009 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He’s got a point though – these “wrestleboxing” (or just crappy kickboxing) matches tend to do well when it comes to UFC FotN bonuses. It’s obviously a style they want associated with their brand.
Contributor Emeritus - BloodyElbow.com
by Chris Nelson on Apr 2, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It always seems to be the lightweights as well.
Another stats project?
I dislike Matt Hughes.
by MonkeyCHops on Apr 2, 2009 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tilting at windmills here. Round 3 of Kampmann/Condit was a bit of a stalemate. How many minutes passed in the guard with no sweep or pass attempts?
by George Lucas on Apr 2, 2009 1:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Compared to the...
stand, step, overhand right…repeat. of Griffin I’ll take a few minutes at the end of a very technical fight that was more guard work
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/
by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 2, 2009 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Griffin has turned shadowboxing 4 feet away from his opponent into like a quarter million dollars worth of bonuses.
by smoogy on Apr 2, 2009 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is very funny and I completely agree. Instead of smothering somebody for 3 rounds and doing no damage like Guida, Griffin throws punches that rarely land for 3 rounds. And when they do land they do about as much damage as throwing a balloon off your face. But I will throw in that he would kill me in a fight.
by RollinOnShabbos on Apr 2, 2009 2:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Griffin’s repetitive overhand right was more fun to watch than Kampmann’s incessant guillotines. IMO at least.
by George Lucas on Apr 2, 2009 2:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Condit vs. Kampmann was definitely the more entertaining fight and worthy of FOtN honors.
by ufc4 on Apr 2, 2009 1:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The official term is calf slicer. It's a pain submission unless someone is incredibly stong and can do knee damage.
by Luke Thomas on Apr 2, 2009 1:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's better than my wife going "what is that?"
and me going “um…it’s a leg submission.”
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/
by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 2, 2009 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or a knee compression as Rogan was calling it
by Brian Bobby on Apr 2, 2009 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My roommate asked why they were spooning.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Apr 2, 2009 2:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had the same feeling during Condit/Kampmann as I did when I watched Torres/Maeda, Alvareaz/Kawajiri, and Alvarez/Hasnen. That being, “This is fucking awesome.” Round one especially was off the charts.
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Apr 2, 2009 1:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought Condit won that fight. He did more from his back than his opponent did from on top. I think he just spent too much time on his back and the judges don’t always know what to look for.
Kampmann got the third round, though.
by penxv on Apr 2, 2009 1:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The fight was close enough that it kept me on the edge of my seat during the commercial breaks even.
by who me on Apr 2, 2009 1:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Condit vs. Kampmann was a very exciting fight (although the third was a bit slow), Griffin vs. Dos Anjos was interesting for the fact that Griffin’s leg was all wonky after the submission attempt but for the most part it was just me watching in hopes of Dos Anjos pulling something else cool off as opposed to keeping me on the edge of my seat.
by who me on Apr 2, 2009 1:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Right...
it’s not that Griffin/RdA was bad or anything. It’s that the only drama after the submission attempt was “Will Griffin’s leg hold up? Will dos Anjos pull off a lucky punch?”
Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/
by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 2, 2009 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea there wasn’t a moment during that fight where I was wondering if Griffin was about to finish it, heck I don’t remember a moment were I remember thinking that Griffin was even thinking about finishing it. The whole Condit fight was watching Kampmann come into his own in the cage, there was a real story going on in that fight beyond “I wonder if his leg is going to fall off”.
by who me on Apr 2, 2009 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does anyone else think that Condit would have finished Kampmann in a 5 round fight?
by nitro on Apr 2, 2009 1:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No
See above
It's not enough that I succeed. Everyone else must fail.
by Jesse Holland on Apr 2, 2009 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t.
http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com
by Mike Fagan on Apr 2, 2009 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe but to be honest it seemed like it was Kampmann who was getting stronger as the fight went on not Condit.
by who me on Apr 2, 2009 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Kampmann/Condit fight had me at the edge of my seat the entire fight. Not knowing if someone will finally better the other on the ground and submit the other. It was pretty clear once the 2nd round started that griffin was going to win.
If you are going to show someone what MMA truly represents and what it is like when fought at its best you show them the Condit/Kampmann fight. If you want to show someone a sloppy kickboxingmatch pop in the griffin fight
by Brian Bobby on Apr 2, 2009 1:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes Condit vs. Kampman deserved FOTN honors, no there is no conspiracy to give FOTY to a stand up fight that is yet another internet myth that needs to go.
What i’m more angry about is Condit being robbed i’m be more pissed off if he wasn’t an idiot and took a play from the Josh Neer playbook against Nate Diaz. Why in the world would Carlos not stand up and pick apart Kampman like he had in round 1 and 2 and all of a sudden in a semi-close fight decide to fight the last round from your back.
I’m big on Condit have been for years now, he showed everything I said that he was but he was an idiot tonight he gave away this fight and I pray that is the last time he decides to go with such a stupid strategy to finish a fight. Anyways props to Kampman even though his win was bs, he’s tough as nails and will be a force in the WW division just like Condit.
by Raker on Apr 2, 2009 1:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fighting from your back and losing (unsurprisingly). We call that the BJ Penn strategy.
If the fight is going to a close decision, you’d better make sure you’re the one winning the takedown battle.
by bigweeze on Apr 2, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, but I think they were both quality fights. Griffin seems to have a thing for winning these – he’s a very underrated lightweight.
by subo on Apr 2, 2009 1:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it’s just the nerdy “purist” in me coming out but the main event had much more drama as well as diverse techniques on display and was one of the better fights I’ve watched this year let alone tonight.
It’s not just you dude. Definitely one of the more entertaining, back and forth fights I’ve seen in a while. They got robbed.
by pud333 on Apr 2, 2009 1:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They should have a rematch in the near future. Who wouldn’t want another three rounds of that action? Maybe they’ll get the FOTN bonus then.
by Sokonojudo on Apr 2, 2009 2:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Im pissed most about losing the 50 bucks I put on Condit, because at even money he was a great pick. I would’ve personally scored the fight for Condit but I could see where the judges were coming from, considering most of them don’t know dick about sub grappling and just see a guy on top which they see as a dominating position even though he was scoring little if any damage from there. It was pretty obvious to me that Condit could’ve scrambled to his feet whenever he wanted in that 3rd round. I was screaming exactly what Joe Rogan was saying about how he needs to stand up because the judges will probably see it as Kampann controlling instead of Condit setting up submissions and sweeps. In the end though Condit has noone to blame but himself, he chose to try to be cute and pretty and go around flashing his ju-jitsu and I think he wanted to show he was the better ground fighter and in my opinion it cost him the win!
by i am mma on Apr 2, 2009 2:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I appreciated Tyson’s toughness. He is always game and one of the toughest fighters to finish in the UFC. I honestly wouldn’t have been surprised if he was seriously injured and continued to fight hard on that leg.
Tyson may need work and his performance was somewhat sloppy but let’s not pretend Kampmann/Condit was the epitome of perfect technique.
- Both fighters were somewhat gassed
- The striking became slow and sloppy (especially apparent in r2)
- Kampmann kept going for guillotine chokes which weren’t all that threatening (to a solid BJJ practicioner)
- Condit could not defend the takedown if his life depended on it and gave away the 3rd round without taking much damage at all
- Neither fighter had particularly noteworthy explosiveness, cardio, quickness, and a number of other things
I’m a big Condit fan and was disappointed by his showing in what was supposed to be his coming out party. How much time did he spend at ACS only to show up with subpar TDD? His power has been an issue for a number of fights now but he is still on the weak side.
That fight for me just emphasized how far both fighters are from the top a division dominated by wrestlers the quality of Koscheck, Fitch, and GSP.
Anthony Johnson would wipe the floor with both of them in a hurry despite the supposed disparity in skill and ranking if they were to come in at the same level as they did tonight.
Maybe tonight is the night that finally gets me to buy into the conspiracy theory that the UFC is trying to manufacture a specific type of style by setting up this very specific type of reward system.
Aside from the big knee by Condit, and the time he was back mounted (didn’t he foul that up into guard somehow?) there was no solid damage caused. The fight was essentially a stalemate damage-wise full of doomed to fail submissions and weak, tired GnP by Kampmann which elicited no response from Condit.
Griffin’s fight featured a great near submission, another sub attempt, some good takedowns, a few sweeps, some big shots and solid movement around the cage by both fighters.
I came in expecting a romp and Dos Anjos managed to turn it into a fight by injuring Tyson early. I came in expecting a great display of skill by both Condit and Kampmann, but it turns out they each only had enough to fight to a stalemate.
by bigweeze on Apr 2, 2009 2:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the one statement how this fight showed how far they are from the top of the division in certain skill-sets. After seeing both of them display such lackluster takedown defense, it is apparent they would both get ran over by the powerhouse wrestlers in the division. GSP, Kos, and Fitch are all light years ahead of them in mma wrestling, and although Condit and Kampan are both top 12 welterweights and both well rounded overall, they would get absolutley STEAMROLLED by those 3 elite WW’s I named. Condit and Kampmann are both on the right track to improving their wrestling training at ACS and Extreme Couture respectivley but unless they vastly improve in that dept in a hurry I see them both getting ragdolled by the big 3 i mentioned!
by i am mma on Apr 2, 2009 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the BE metarankings, Condit was actually 5th, which seems strange, but those top 3-4 (I would include Alves before Kos) are that much better than everyone else. Kampmann wasn’t even ranked. Looking at the rankings, the talent gap between the top few and the rest is absurd. Condit may be a Top-10 fighter, even with the loss tonight, but GSP looks insurmountable.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett
by themachiavellian on Apr 2, 2009 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kampmann is still ranked as a middleweight (25th), I’m sure that will change now. This was Condit’s first loss since 2006 and he had four title defenses but but it still should make people wonder about his ranking.
by who me on Apr 2, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
People get fooled by meaningless belts
It’s the reason guys like Condit, Jake Shields, and Robbie Lawler get perpetually over-ranked. All three are good fighters, but don’t deserve to be ranked near the top of their divisions.
by BilboMcFonzie on Apr 2, 2009 3:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This decision was actually less of a travisty than some of the previous FOTN awards, but I do agree that the award was issued incorrectly.
by soadtrails on Apr 2, 2009 7:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree, I couldn’t believe it when I read the awards. Condit/Kampmann was the best fight I’ve seen this year. Not nearly as bad of an award than UFC 94’s FOTN- Guida vs Nate Diaz. though!
http://mmascraps.net
by fedor291 on Apr 2, 2009 7:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was extremely disappointed in every card except the main event last night.
I would have been happy no matter who came out on top in the Condit vs Campmann bout. The Griffin vs Dos Anjos match was more like three rounds of sparring. It had a few moments where Dos Anjos appeared hurt, but then Griffin just clinched and went for the takedown. What about the undercards, did anything exciting happen on them?
Arguing on the internet is like being in the special olympics, even when you win you are still retarded.
by dnevil001 on Apr 2, 2009 8:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And in something slightly unrelated..
I think junie should drop to FW.. He could do it if he wanted to.. i think he should be matched up against Dos Anjos, then win lose or draw, he should drop to FW and compete in the WEC..
he’d have a much bigger strength advantage there, plus there’s a chance he could be a contender there.. (anyone even think he could be a contender at 155? no? ..didn’t think so.)
by Anton Tabuena on Apr 2, 2009 8:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Junie’s crazy and that’s going to both help and hurt his career but I don’t think he will ever be anything even close to a contender. I do agree that he would be better of in the WEC, not that he would be a real contender at 145 either but the Junie show does draw eyeballs for some odd reason.
by who me on Apr 2, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yea, it would help get the WEC more views..
and who knows, maybe fighting at a lighter weight would let him perform better.. he’s really prone to be overpowered at 155 with his size..
by Anton Tabuena on Apr 2, 2009 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Just aw that the tyson griffin fight recieved fight of the night honors and couldn’t believe it. The kampmann vs. Condit fight was 3 times as good it had both fighters trying to finish the fights with a ton of submissions and great striking. If there was one knock on that fight it was a slow third round, but none the less “Fight of the Night”.
by Marine44 on Apr 2, 2009 8:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Definately
One of the most entertaining scraps I’ve seen in a long time. I had it for Condit though. Those guys both got robbed of that bonus. Bummer…
Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."
by xFenixKnightx on Apr 2, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I keep waiting for the UFC to say-
April Fools!! Condit-Kampmann had to be FOTN.
Arguing on the internet is like being in the special olympics, even when you win you are still retarded.
by dnevil001 on Apr 2, 2009 9:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What about the undercards?
I have not seen any results for them.
Arguing on the internet is like being in the special olympics, even when you win you are still retarded.
by dnevil001 on Apr 2, 2009 10:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Preliminary card
* Middleweight bout: Tim McKenzie vs. Aaron Simpson
Simpson defeated McKenzie via TKO (punches) at 1:40 of round 1.
* Middleweight bout: Rob Kimmons vs. Joe Vedepo
Kimmons defeated Vedepo via technical submission (guillotine choke) at 1:54 of round 1.
* Middleweight bout: Jorge Rivera vs. Nissen Osterneck
Rivera defeated Osterneck via unanimous decision (29-28, 29-28, 29-28).
* Middleweight bout: Tim Credeur vs. Nick Catone
Credeur defeated Catone via submission (guillotine choke) at 3:45 of round 2.
* Welterweight bout: Brock Larson vs. Jesse Sanders
Larson defeated Sanders via submission (rear naked choke) at 2:01 of round 1.
* Middleweight bout: Ricardo Almeida vs. Matt Horwich
Almeida defeated Horwich via unanimous decision (30-27, 30-27, 30-27).
* Catchweight (158 lb) bout: Gleison Tibau vs. Jeremy Stephens
Tibau defeated Stephens via unanimous decision (30-27, 30-27, 29-28).
by MMAcGyver on Apr 2, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks man!
I appreciate it. Was this posted somewhere & I just missed it?
Arguing on the internet is like being in the special olympics, even when you win you are still retarded.
by dnevil001 on Apr 2, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Problem
I didn’t find it here on BE earlier, they usually post it though
by MMAcGyver on Apr 2, 2009 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree with the article
I just assumed Condit – Kampman won fight of the night. It was a great back and forth fight with both men coming close to finishing their opponent. Personally, I would have awarded the fight 29-28 to Condit with Kampman only winning the last round, but I can see 29-28 Kampman. Griffin-Dos Anjos was a good fight but not even close to Condit- Kampman. The only reason I can see is that the last round of Condit/Kampman was somewhat slow. Griffin/Dos Anjos was a good fight, but I believe Condit/Kampman was much better
by GroundNPound561 on Apr 2, 2009 10:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another thing why do I keep hearing from people that Condit was dominated by Kampmann’s takedown’s when he chose to fight the third round from his back. He got up or reversed Martin repeatedly in the first 2 rounds and yet all of a sudden Kampmann turned into Bader with great top control. People need to rewatch that fight because i’m hearing alot of comments that have got me shaking my head wondering what fight people were watching.
by Raker on Apr 2, 2009 1:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He didn’t choose to fight from his back.
- He was winning the standup, why would he want to get taken down repeatedly and fight off of his back?
- And if he in fact did want to work from the bottom, why was he expending effort to get back to a standing position repeatedly?
by bigweeze on Apr 2, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Mean...
Condit and Kampman was a good fight…. but it did severely slow down towards the end, and was a much more evenly matched fight than the perception of Dos Anjos vs. Griffin…
I think either fight could have got the award, so I don’t think this is the best example of the UFC supporting a more standup based style when Dos Anjos’s BJJ is what kept him in the fight, as he attempted a few kimuras and leglocks, and was able to negate Tyson’s wrestling (top control/positional balance). I also thought that they both landed a decent amount of shots on the feet, and kept up a more brisk pace…
I am now a fan of Rafael Dos Anjos… I think if he could work on his striking he could be a real menace to the division… Its easy to forget he was beating J. Stephens before the highlight real KO as well… I think anyone overlooking Rafael in any fight is in for a problem
by Loot on Apr 2, 2009 2:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well put and agreed. But I haven’t lost hope yet. It seems to be slightly political right now, but as the masses get more educated and appreciate wonderful fights like this, I hope they’ll be rewarded appropriately.
Did someone here once suggest 5 rounds for title fights? This is a great example. Kampmann and Condit should have gone to 5.
by Dooda on Apr 2, 2009 3:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He didn’t choose to fight from his back.
- He was winning the standup, why would he want to get taken down repeatedly and fight off of his back?
- And if he in fact did want to work from the bottom, why was he expending effort to get back to a standing position repeatedly?
Again rewatch the fight when Condit wanted to get up he got up he chose to keep going for subs the entire third round for whatever reason Kampmann did nothing to keep him there.
by Raker on Apr 3, 2009 12:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















