Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bracketology 2012: Duke Finally Steps Up To The No. 1 Line

Anderson Silva Has Very Little Shame

Anderson_silva_def__784815a_mediumI'm honestly shocked anyone is defending the absolute deliberate and unprofessional performance turned in last night by UFC Middleweight champion Anderson Silva. What the alleged pound-for-pound king offered fans was the equivalent of doing one's job just enough to not get fired. I felt like I was watching the worst cliche of labor union work ethic where employees take advantage of every contractual reprieve from performing the responsibilities of their job just to skate through until quitting time saves them.

Anyone who has been to their fair share of amateur fights should've been reminded of their experience watching Silva vs. Leites. The amateur ranks are filled with pure jiu-jitsu players looking for MMA experience, so a significant portion of them flop to guard as Leites did after realizing they don't want to get punched but can't take their opposition to the ground. This dynamic happens in the professional ranks obviously, but not nearly to the same extent. Like hands on the knees is a universal indication a fighter is fatigued, flopping to guard in MMA is a universal sign your opposition is out of options and ready to be finished off. It is the ultimate signal your opponent is not able to do anything to you and can be overcome by pressing the action. Interestingly, however, nearly every time I've personally witnessed a fighter flop to guard in the amateur ranks, the retreating fighter is quickly defeated. Silva, clearly too preoccupied for such pedestrian responsibilities, couldn't be bothered to follow through on what amateur MMA fighters commonly recognize as the beginning of the end.

It's understandable MMA fans want to be forgiving of cerebral or cautious approaches to fighting, but that forgiveness has no place here. Your eyes were not lying to you: what Silva did was absolutely deliberate and positively negligent. Leites has responsibility is last night's disaster of a main event, but he turned out to be who we thought he was. That he flopped to guard is regrettable, but he simply didn't have the skill set to compete at this level. Silva, on the other hand, had more than enough tools. What is infinitely more regrettable is that Silva squandered countless offensive opportunities to put him away standing. I've managed to suffer through three viewings of their fight and to say Silva didn't push the attack in the stand-up is the understatement of the century. From the middle of the third round on, Silva employed nothing more than a potshot approach that looked as if he'd simply forgot he has some of the most excellent and diverse combinations in all of MMA.

What's really alarming is the language Silva uses to describe his feelings on the fight:

"I’m comfortable with people’s opinion, because they have a right to their opinion, but when I went out there, everything I [prepared for] in training, I felt I executed in the fight. My game plan was that I wanted to go to the later rounds with Thales. I was unable to finish. Sometimes I’m able to finish guys and sometimes I’m not able to. But I felt I proved to everybody that I’m able to go five rounds and that I’m in good shape."

This is obfuscation of the first order. Silva is not fighting to prove he has the stamina to go five rounds or that he can jog without breaking a sweat. Those are expectations for the champion of the UFC's middleweight division. It's no wonder Silva turned in a reluctant performance considering his expectation threshold is the same for participants in a fitness step class.

I don't know if Silva is simply uninterested in fighting MMA anymore or whether he's still pining after a boxing match with Roy Jones, Jr. What's motivating him to do this is impossible to know without talking to him personally, but let's remind ourselves of one clear rule: MMA is a for-profit, entertainment business. Yet "entertainment" doesn't mean Silva or any fighter has to reduce themselves to rock 'em sock 'em robots. The fortunate truth about MMA is that most entertainment actually comes when fighters work to finish fights and attack throughout the course of the bout. It means when there's an opening to hurt opposition, you take it. Appropriate risk management and sustained offensive attacks are not mutually exclusive. Silva could've met the UFC's and fans' expectations about being entertained without unnecessarily putting himself at too great a risk. What people need to come to grips with is that Silva chose to take it easy on Leites. He chose to childishly throw absurd and positively perfunctory kicks to Leites's knees when he could've much more easily thrown round kicks to the inside and outside of Leites's lead leg (sorry, folks, but neither Leites's wrestling nor his muay Thai is good enough to warrant pulling back on kicks to avoid the takedown). He chose to not throw aggressive combinations to the head and body with his pinpoint accuracy. The sad reality is you cannot have it both ways: you cannot tout a fighter's peerless technical and athletic abilities to destruct opponents standing and then forgive him when he doesn't use those skills in clear opportunities against an opponent who was out of offensive options and could do no more than flop to guard.

I don't know what sort of childish protest Silva is launching here. But what I do know is that fans and the UFC should not cry when a fight goes five rounds because opponents could not finish each other. However, they have every right to be angry when fighters who can don't even try.

Comment 167 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree, but I think the real issue is we give Silva too much credit. We think of him as this monster who can end fights whenever he feels like it, but in reality he needs his opponents to help him make it happen. If they don’t engage, Anderson isn’t good enough to take the fight to them.

They marketed him as the terminator, but he’s just a guy trying to keep his belt and take as few punches as possible. Thales was so much better than him on the ground that it didn’t make sense to try any GnP, and Cote hit so hard it didn’t make sense to try combinations or the thai clinch.

We like to think of him as somebody who can do it all and always finds a way to finish, but the reality may be he just had a good run and now it’s over. He’s not as good as we thought. Noone is.

by Razzel on Apr 19, 2009 6:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Thank you Luke. You nailed it.

http://www.fourouncestofreedom.com

by Tim Burke on Apr 19, 2009 6:41 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a shameful display

However, let’s not confuse what he did last night with his ability as a fighter. Criticize his effort, but let’s not question his P4P status. Leites was a guy that put up one hell of a fight against Marquardt but last night looked like a little child fighting in an adult sport.
 
AS could have finished him many times but didn’t. He should have engaged but didn’t. It was a craptacular effort, but nothing in it indicates that he’s lost any of his incredible fighting ability. He still looked like he’s several notches above anybody the UFC could throw at him. Perhaps that’s his problem. If he was a step slower, a little less accurate, a lot less fearsome, perhaps last night’s fight could have been entertaining. Too bad.

Blame him for his reluctance to engage, but I can’t fault him for his skills.

by cyph on Apr 19, 2009 6:42 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree to a point his striking obviously lightyears beyond Leites but his avoid hitting the ground at all costs attitude seemed like a weakness to me

by drano on Apr 19, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because NOBODY else does that…. Oh, wait…

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Apr 20, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

If all you're judging P4P on is pure ability..

sure he doesn’t lose anything. But I judge it on ability + fights. This is two awful performances in a row. He loses significant ground in the P4P discussion in my world

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would argue that even if we were judging on pure ability his P4P spot should suffer. Silva showed last night that he has no confidence in his ground game, we saw in the henderson and lutter fight where he was able to be controlled on the ground but he was flat out scared of leites guard. I’m not excusing Leites performance in anyway because I feel like he should admit that he did not deserve a title shot.

by drano on Apr 19, 2009 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think it’s really presumptuous to assume that because he didn’t want to fight leites in the one area of the game where he was even a threat it means he was scared.

by yngjzy on Apr 19, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think it’s presumptous at all silva has avoided the ground game at all cost since his win over hendo

by drano on Apr 20, 2009 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

On having it both ways

Maybe change the title to Anderson Silva and Thales Leites have very little shame.

I poop rainbows.

by Blackout612 on Apr 19, 2009 6:48 PM EDT reply actions  

well-written, Luke

& great command of the English language. I had to look up ‘obfuscation’.

by steak_knife on Apr 19, 2009 6:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Right on, Luke.

Your post is spot on. I remember after watching Leites pull guard for the umpteenth time, I said out loud, “For god’s sake, finish him! He’s begging for it! He’s got nothing!” I just didn’t understand what I was seeing. I don’t know what Silva is trying to pull, but it’s so frustrating. I thought the Cote fight was offensive, but I was wrong. THIS fight was offensive. Something is rotten in Denmark.

by pud333 on Apr 19, 2009 6:59 PM EDT reply actions  

I though this was particularly petulant:

by -Sam on Apr 19, 2009 7:07 PM EDT reply actions  

I would have to agree with Luke…

It is very clear Anderson is doing this on purpose.

For the life of me – I have no idea why. It’s like a kid holding his breath until he turns blue because he didnt get the toy he wanted. The kid hasn’t the logic to realize he is only hurting himself… but an adult should have this logical capability.

Does he think he’s going to outsmart Zuffa? The only person who will get fucked at the end is Silva.

by mmalogic on Apr 19, 2009 7:14 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Pretty obvious to me he’s mad about Roy Jones.

by Michael Rome on Apr 19, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he is not content with his salary

by The Bronzeville Bully on Apr 19, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

His fighting style got more cautious when he started making more money, something that is very common in other sports.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

He got a big raise a few months ago. It’s not money.

by Michael Rome on Apr 19, 2009 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

You need to cough up some more details about the Anderson/UFC saga if you’ve got them. What is Anderson trying to accomplish? Destroy his PPV value?

by smoogy on Apr 19, 2009 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Probably so. But is this the way to get the big $$$?!?!? Guys like Lidell and now GSP and BJ Penn get the big money because they go in for the kill. They are exciting. Silva is only hurting himself with this crap. I wondered too is this some kind of protest over Roy Jones Jr.

by pwdmarcello on Apr 19, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s not upset about the Roy Jones deal…

He has buyers remorse on the new multi fight contract he signed resulting from that. Even though he wont say it – he thinks this is a way to “whine” about it – little does he know this will be costing him more at the end.

by mmalogic on Apr 19, 2009 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you guys talking about the one he signed last year where he is making $200,000 and points on the PPV?

by The Bronzeville Bully on Apr 19, 2009 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

somebody needs to get mutherfuckin bitch slapped…

by mmalogic on Apr 19, 2009 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know but that was the purse he made at James Irvin, which at the time was the same as Vera. But, I have no idea what he made in Chicago cause Illinois didn’t release the numbers

by The Bronzeville Bully on Apr 19, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know how you avoid the miracle flying heel hook or a lucky punch?

You finish your opponent when given the opportunity.

http://www.fourouncestofreedom.com

by Tim Burke on Apr 19, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or… I don’t know… hit them from the outside where they can’t hit you. And don’t get into spots where you’re trading blows…

-Ben
http://www.trueslant.com/benlebovitz

by LifeTilt on Apr 19, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

You mean like Silva did with heavy punchers (which Leites is not) like Leben and Irvin?

Was Silva “technical”? Of course, but that isn’t my problem. My problem is that a fighter of his ability with those offensive openings should take advantage and work to finish (aggression and damage are scoring criteria, after all), especially when the opposition can’t really do anything back. For crying out loud, people, stop being an apologist for a fighter not giving his all by pretending to wave the flag for technical fighting. Everyone respects technique and I’ve long been an avid Machida supporter. Go back and read what I’ve written about them. But having solid technique does not save you from criticism when you’ve given a half-assed effort for 25 mins.

If you really are a fan of technique, then you should be outraged because you didn’t actually see a whole lot put to good use. Do you people really believe Martin Kampmann can damage Leites more in 15 mins than Silva can over the course of 25 minutes? I mean, seriously. This is just ludicrous.

In any fight one can always make a case for fighting elusive and tactical to avoid damage. But that argument does not absolve someone from attacking when an opponent is BEGGING for it, particularly when you have the capability and your opponent can’t do much to stop it. That’s the argument, so this whole notion of “this is why US fans are dumb” is just insane babble. It’s not blood lust, but it’s asking fighters to, you know, actually fight. That’s the most reasonable position you can have.

by Luke Thomas on Apr 19, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

“If you really are a fan of technique, then you should be outraged because you didn’t actually see a whole lot put to good use. Do you people really believe Martin Kampmann can damage Leites more in 15 mins than Silva can over the course of 25 minutes? I mean, seriously. This is just ludicrous.”

Thales didn’t refuse to engage in that fight either.

I don’t want to speak for anyone else, but I understand that Silva left some chips on the table, so to speak. I was still entertained by his complete control of the bout, though. For whatever reason, Silva didn’t go out and obliterate Leites. Whatever. I don’t think it’s shameful. I don’t think it’s a mockery of the sport. I’m not going to hang him up on the cross for it. It is what it is – a controlling if underwhelming performance from one of the top fighters in the world.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Thales didn’t refuse to engage in that fight either."

He doesn’t have the skill set to do so. Silva does and then some.

by Luke Thomas on Apr 19, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand that, but the point is that Kampmann had more opportunity to inflict damage in that fight. Sure, Silva probably should finish a guy who has zero capability for offense. But Kampmann fought a Leites who came forward, threw strikes (I wouldn’t doubt if Leites threw more strikes in one round of the Kampmann fight than he did in the entirety of this fight), and gave him openings. After the second round, Leites gave up any attempt to win the bout and just looked to get to the final bell any way possible.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Silva let him..

because he would rather be cute than fight to finish. I’m not spouting hyperbole when I say this…but it was one of the worst fights I’ve ever seen at this level.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know. At this point I’m just going to have to agree to disagree with the other side. Round 1 was certainly one of the worst rounds I’ve ever watched and the fight is probably one of the worst title fights in UFC history.

But with regards to Silva’s performance, strategy, etc…I just don’t really care that much. It’s no different to me than a football team running out the clock up 27-10 in the fourth quarter. You don’t risk throwing an interception, getting players hurt, etc. The dude’s making truckloads of cash at this point and I can’t exactly blame him for fighting in a style that guarantees that income.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anderson Silva didn’t have to engage to win the fight he had an easy path to victory and he took it. That made for a real sucky ass fight but it’s Anderson Silva’s perogative how he goes out there and fights and it’s not like he fought a stupid fight because his win was never in doubt. No one wants to see that crap and Dana White should be furious but then perhaps they should of booked a fight with someone who could force Silva to fight.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did he fight stupid? No, I agree he did not fight stupid.

Did he fight to the fullest without putting himself at undue risk? Not even close and that’s my problem.

by Luke Thomas on Apr 19, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree totally with that, the thing is there is only one solution I can think of to that problem and that is in Joe Silva’s hands. Once you start dictating to a fighter how they are going to fight you have done a lot more damage to the sport than Anderson Silva phoning one in did. If the UFC doesn’t want Anderson Silva on cruise control then they need to book someone who can push him and actually put the fight at risk. You know Anderson Silva couldn’t get away with that crap fighting someone like Dan Henderson or Rich Franklin but people were really scratching their heads at the booking of Cote and Leites to start with.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why is nobody talking about how obviously frustrated Silva was by Leites’ flopping? Even Chuck Liddell was pissed about that. I agree that Silva’s own agenda of proving his stamina and what not is kind of lame. I still can admire his technique, while feeling somewhat disappointed that he did not get a finish. Sure, he should have given more. Leites shouldn’t have obviously given up and flopped. The UFC should have put in someone who might have posed more of a threat I guess? although on paper, Leites seemed like he could maybe do something. I would have rather seen Marquardt or Maia (I have somehow never seen Okami before and yes I’ve only been following since TUF, but only because that coincidentally was when I got cable) Seems like a perfect storm of BS happened and caused a mediocre fight. I still wouldn’t wholly blame Silva. If he had fought a ridiculously aggressive opponent and toyed with them the way he did a lame Leites, aka Machida’d them, I feel like this wouldn’t be as big of a deal. In closing, I believe the blame falls on Silva, Leites and Joel/Dana, and also to a much lesser extent the Fans who may be spoiled by Silva’s past fights. I personally don’t condemn Anderson.

by CliChe Guevara on Apr 19, 2009 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not JUST...

that he didn’t get a finish. It’s that he at no point even acted like he gave a shit about trying to finish.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

He didn’t have to he was winning so handily he didn’t have do much of anything. Seriously he was fighting a fainting goat in there loud noises were scoring him points. Silva should of murdered the guy in the cage but to be honest when did he ever need to push the action? When did he need to try to finish the fight? He could of sat on his corner stool and occasionally yelled boo and still won that decision it was never in doubt and he was never pushed at all. The fight sucked ass and Anderson Silva’s performance was pretty pathetic but honestly is there any rule that says that a fighter must try and finish the fight? He didn’t just do enough to win he won handily on the score cards, it was never in doubt. He would of never got away with that crap if he was fighting someone who was also trying to win the fight.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

It isn’t Silva’s job to give an entertaining fight. That is pro wrestling. It’s his job to fight to win. If he chose not to TKO Thales Leites, that is his prerogative. He won the fight and did so in a manner that made it impossible for him to lose. His miscellaneous techniques were simply there to lure Thales into fighting a more aggressive game. He did not, and therefore the presumptuous fans with a disgusting sense of entitlement are up in arms on the issue.

by Ahhhoki on Apr 19, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, then we agree because at no point did I ever say it was his job to give an entertaining fight. I said it’s his job to fight to the fullest extent of his capability, which he didn’t do. And when he does do that, he is entertaining, so everyone wins.

by Luke Thomas on Apr 19, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, I don’t think he is obligated to fight to the best of his ability either. It just seems to me that the polarization that stems from this issue is determined by the fact that certain individuals – yourself, along with many other bloggers and analysts – are disappointed because Anderson did not try as hard as he could to finish Thales Leites. What he displayed was arrogant but we cannot expect Silva to deviate from his game plan because of some desire to see him finish his opponent. While I’ll generally disagree with the Silva/Machida comparison, you’ll notice that even Machida leaves himself open to an upset knockout when he rushes in. In the fight against Ortiz, in the later rounds Machida was being more aggressive, but Tito was landing shots because of it.

Silva could have been more polite about it in the cage and at the pressers, but I’ll side with him every time on this because his legacy is much more important than this one fight. And if he got flying scissor heel-hooked by Thales Leites, he definitely wouldn’t be in the argument for the best P4P fighter currently, much less best fighter ever.

by Ahhhoki on Apr 19, 2009 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, I don’t think he is obligated to fight to the best of his ability either.

This sport will die (like how Anderson’s drawing power is basically non-existent) if fighters are out there halfassing it.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed but that still doesn’t make it Anderson Silva’s responsiblity to entertain or to kill the guy his he is fighting. He is a prize fighter his goal is to win the fight by any means neccessary, he is not obligated to finish the fight early or in a manner than anyone else wants to see. The fans getting entertained is the UFC’s problem, Anderson Silva can singlehandedly kill the entire sport with his lackluster dull ass dominations of opponents and that’s his perogative because that is the sport, it’s the UFC’s responsiblity to see that I am entertained and get my money’s worth but they need to do that without destroying the sport aspect of this too.

Book the guy against someone who wants to get in there and beat his ass and I can guarantee you will see more entertaining performances but the sad fact is that Anderson SIlva still dominated Thales Leites in that fight, just because we wanted to gouge our eyes out because of it doesn’t change that fact.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s a pretty bad slippery slope Brent. Just because Anderson Silva phones one in against a clearly outclassed opponent doesn’t mean everyone else will. If anything, it makes competent matchmaking much more important.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

No...

I’m simply saying that if the understanding is that fighters aren’t held to the standard of fighting to the best of their ability and we accept half-assing it then it could lead to damage long-term

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

When you start dictating to fighters how they are supposed to fight then you do have a problem. It’s not like Anderson Silva just did enough to win he dominated that fight, it was never in doubt. Who is supposed to tell him he has to go that extra mile or that he must win a fight early even if he knows it’s already wrapped up? Whose going to tell the guy that he has to risk a sure decision and go in agressive and try to knock out a guy whose already beat? Yes that fight was awful but Anderson Silva could of done even less and still got a easy win, the extra effort on his part really would just be for show.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Judging from what Dana is saying...

I guess my answer will simply be..

…his boss

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do we want Dana telling fighters how to fight though?

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

If it is...

“I expect you to not half ass it in the main event of a major show”

Then yes…I don want him telling them that

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

So he should tell Anderson Silva to force the action and follow the fainting goat to the ground even though that would be to his disadvantage or because his gameplan didn’t meet up to fan expectations? Just because they run that silly Gladiator crap at the first of the shows doesn’t mean that these guys are fighting for Caesar’s amusement.

It takes two guys to fight and there is a difference between half assing it and fighting towards one’s advantage and away from your opponents. When Leites all but gave up on seriously going for the win that fight was over, from that point on should Silva of risked the sure win to go after the spectacular win? Anderson Silva is already the champion it’s up to the challenger to take it away from him. If Dana White wants to make a statement then cut Leites.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

In a privately owned professional league like the UFC the ultimate goal will always be to entertain. In a nationally funded sport system that “problem” never arises, to the detriment of the popularity/growth of concerned sport.

If the people paying for the professional leagues aren’t satisfied with the product (i.e. aren’t entertained) then they will watch something else. AS might well stay the most dominant fighter in the MW division and still not get a contract extension for that reason – he’s boring and scares people away from consuming.

If behaviour like his of late has an impact on the growth of the sport, I say cut him loose. I’m not sure it will if it is isolated to one fighter, but a trend would.

Everyone must understand that the nationally funded system has a lot of drawbacks. The entertainment value isn’t protected by a promoter with something at stake; the only thing that is of interest is following a set of rules. No matter the cost. If that is the other option to entertainment companies promoting fights, we should want none of it. The sport would stay buried and the quality of fights would be overall significantly lower.

AS must understand this. What motivates him to fight can only be speculated on. But he has an incentive to participate: his purse. A purse he has worked up to by being entertaining while being dominant. Even if he has no obligation to entertain, self interest should motivate him to do so. Otherwise I, and a lot of fans with me, will excercise our “right” to not buy his fights. What’s the problem?

by ununkvadrium on Apr 20, 2009 5:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Your not going to see a state funded MMA system in the US….ever. That just isn’t going to happen.

As far as fan’s not watching that is your perogative, there will be a definate price Silva will pay for these types of performances but what are you going to do, force him to fight differently? It is that simple if you don’t like it don’t watch it, if enough people tune out then the UFC won’t book him anymore but that still doesn’t make it right for someone to go in and dictate to Anderson Silva how he is going to gameplan and fight in his fights.

by who me on Apr 20, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we understand eachother. No one should try to influence strategy á la Kimbo – Petruzelli. On the other hand, Zuffa has a right to book AS on undercards from now on should they deem so prudent.

Btw. I think we disagree on what happened in the fight. I saw a clown and you saw someone fighting for a win.

by ununkvadrium on Apr 20, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

normally...

I agree with you Brent, but this is one of those times that I most not. Yes this fight was boring, but Anderson played to his advantages by not going to the ground every time Leites decided to fall to his back and wait for Silva to follow. This particular argument/discussion should be just as much about Leites inability to make this a fight as much as it was Silva’s. Anderson had it wrapped up and didn’t want to risk a submission by following him to the mat, where is the problem in that. Not exciting but good strategy. As for Dana telling his fighters how to do anything, does anyone remember Kimbo vs. Petrizelly(I know I it’s wrong, I forgot how to spell his name.) That is boarder line fight fixing and that will do far more damage to the popularity of the sport than any boring fight could achieve. As for all this crap about Silva not performing to the best of his abilities and going for the finish, am I the only person that saw near the end of the last round where Silva started feeding shots to Leites on his back. Those are the same type of punches that he has landed time and time again on fighters like Irvin, and many others that went to sleep. Here’s an idea, maybe Leites has a better “chin” then people want to give him credit for. Silva landed three or four really good shots that busted him up pretty good and didn’t knock him out. A little bit late in the fight yes, but he still went for the win, and didn’t or couldn’t finish the fight.

by proflex on Apr 20, 2009 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not Silva’s job to fight at the full extent of his capability it’s his job to get little W’s put on his record. It’s the UFC bookers job to get Anderson SIlva challenged to the point were he has to fight to the full extent of his capabiltes but he just gets paid to win fights (and there was never any doubt about him winning that fight).

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

US fans are NOT dumb

Ok, my title to the original is a bit aggressive (but I still like the broad point it makes). And, ok, let’s drop the argument about enjoying Silva’s performance (I liked it, everyone else didn’t, fine, I’ll agree to disagree, and I’ll continue to think you’re dumb for it).

However… here’s the point that I don’t see how you can argue with: Silva has no real incentive to do anything beyond getting a win in this fight. Obviously, no I don’t think Kampmann can damage Leites more… However, I think that Kampmann has a far greater incentive to damage Leites than Silva does, and thus, a far greater incentive to put himself in harm’s way.

Watching this fight though, was like watching a Football blow out… they bring in the 2nd string quarterback, they take a knee to run the clock out, and above all, they don’t risk anyone getting hurt when there’s no point.

-Ben
http://www.trueslant.com/benlebovitz

by LifeTilt on Apr 19, 2009 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey buddy, I liked the performance too.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

yay!

Hey, yr the sack MG guy! I love your site!

-Ben
http://www.trueslant.com/benlebovitz

by LifeTilt on Apr 19, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

(disclaimer… I’m from the US…)

-Ben
http://www.trueslant.com/benlebovitz

by LifeTilt on Apr 19, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can’t even compare Machida’s performances to this performance. The difference? When Machida smells blood and has the opportunity to finish, he does. In Silva’s last two performances he’s done nothing but showboat and toy with his opposition. He’s had ample opportunity, in both fights, to put the other fighter away and never took advantage of any of those situations. For as much as people like to play the “respect” card with Silva, he disrespected the fans and the sport last night.

by Adam Morgan on Apr 19, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it’s because Machida …
1. doesn’t have the belt and needed some nice highlight reel stuff to get his shot. I’d imagine him to have a similar trajectory that Anderson has… destroy for a few fights, then be ok with taking decisions.
2. hasn’t fought 5 rounds yet…. So, when he’s got the belt, I’d expect to see him putting on displays like this, of wearing guys down for 5 rounds, getting into as little danger as possible, and taking a decision against any opponent who isn’t particularly aggressive, and giving him an opportunity or forcing exchanges.

Remember, none of the 5 fights leading up to Anderson fighting for the UFC belt got out of the 2nd round. In his first 5 defenses none of them got out of the 1st round either. I mean.. think about it from his perspective for a second… he has no incentive at this point to risk injury or any kind of freak loss. He will not put himself in a high variance spot fighting guys who obviously have no chance against him. Give him some real competition, where he needs to push any edge he has, and we’ll see some spectacular finishes again (like move up to 205…)

-Ben
http://www.trueslant.com/benlebovitz

by LifeTilt on Apr 19, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

If this is the style we're going to be watching from here on..

get ready for the incredible, fast fall of the UFC.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seriously,

I didn’t hate the fight as much as everybody else (but t I can understand Luke’s critique), but if this continues with much regularity, it spells doom.

"I see him beating Anderson Silva. I see him picking him apart. Him at a 131 years old...(trails off)." - Tito on Belfort at Affliction:DOR

by Rundownloser on Apr 19, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

And following the recent blogging trend,

get ready for the incredible rise of the WWE.

by Ahhhoki on Apr 19, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

because wanting the sport draw money means that I’m out to ruin it.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

So which countries besides the US and Canada were in awe of the amazing performance Silva put on last night?

by Razzel on Apr 19, 2009 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brazil?

-Ben
http://www.trueslant.com/benlebovitz

by LifeTilt on Apr 19, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Imaginationland: No real country could ever be amazed by that performance

by Sokonojudo on Apr 19, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry… maybe the title of this comment was a little aggressive… I just hate this mentality of “blood blood blood…” I mean, I like seeing KO’s and submissions as much as the next guy, but man, I thought it was just awesome that he could make another fighter look that totally outclassed. It’s just something you don’t ever see, and I thought it was awesome to watch.

-Ben
http://www.trueslant.com/benlebovitz

by LifeTilt on Apr 19, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

silva/leites was abhorrent. it’s like silva didn’t even care.

anderson should be called out. good job, luke.

by dr. ransom on Apr 19, 2009 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

the stupid slug fest of Bonner/Forrest 1.

“Slug fest”? A gathering of gastropods? Or do you mean “slugfest” or a more archaic “slug-fest”?

The biggest problem is that is reveals a lack of discipline. It’s the Tim Sylvia strategy of fighting – play it safe. Did you like seeing him dominate in AA 3? Against Vera? Against Monson? I’m worried that he’s turning into a dancier Sylvia.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Apr 19, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you want to discuss gastropods...

Go over to “Gastropod Linker” or “Gastropod Fanhouse.” There will be no discussion of slugs here, good sir.

by Cannon Jacques on Apr 19, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah? What’re you gonna do? Pour salt me?

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Apr 19, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wish there was a way to de-rec posts.

If you think criticism of Anderson’s performance last night was confined to the United States, you must have watched the fight muted so as not to hear the thousands of non-Americans chanting their displeasure.

by George Lucas on Apr 19, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely true

“I don’t know if Silva is simply uninterested in fighting MMA anymore or whether he’s still pining after a boxing match with Roy Jones, Jr.”

He is uninterested in fighting MMA any more, and he told us as much though nobody really recognized it as such, as I discussed in my FanPost here.

I couldn’t have worded this any better. I can’t believe this fight is as polarizing as it is. It seems so many “hardcore” fans want to demonstrate how enlightened they are about the sport that they are ready to coronate Anderson king of a new brilliant kind of fighting, when in reality what he did was incredibly unprofessional, boring, and antithetical to every reasonable expectation placed upon him.

I was a HUGE Anderson Silva fan before this fight; even through the Cote fight. But after last night’s performance I have lost a serious amount of respect for the man. Playing the prima donna role for 25 minutes expecting us to shell out our hard-earned money to watch that personal ego trip is more vanity than I can tolerate out of my champions, thank you very much.

by Numbers on Apr 19, 2009 7:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Well said, but...

I’m just a dumb fan from the US, so what do I know. What a minute, it was Canada who was booing him out of the building, so I guess they are dumb too. Can someone tell me who the smart countries are?

by Razzel on Apr 19, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I really that people who enjoyed the fight and/or didn’t totally despise it are now chided for being pretentious MMA fans trying to show off how sophisticated they are. I enjoy watching fighters, golfers, football teams, etc. dominate their opposition. I enjoy watching fighters like Lyoto Machida, Floyd Mayweather Jr., and Anderson Silva put on a defensive display that completely befuddles their opponent. MMA, to me, is a sport first and entertainment second.

I understand WHY Silva’s getting shit on for his performance. I don’t agree with all of it or the sheer volume of it, but I can empathize with those people. But dont’ try to pigeonhole fans who can appreciate that sort of technical brilliance because you don’t enjoy it.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

As you can see from the post above, they very clearly are pretentious mma fans. They percieve their liking the fight as a result of some superiority in intelligence. It’s sad really.

by Razzel on Apr 19, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right you are Razzel

And it is just silly. If you want to pretend Silva executed some brilliant strategy for 25 minutes, and carry on some charade that you are in on the secret that the rest of us missed, that is your right, but don’t proceed as if you understand what the rest of MMA fans are just too fat, dumb and happy to comprehend.

by Numbers on Apr 19, 2009 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

The difference is that I understand I’m the exception to the rule and don’t expect everyone else to enjoy what I do.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not really sure it was technical brilliance from Silva last night. From Machida? Absolutely. Love the guy. But what Silva was doing was juvenile, petulant and frankly unbecoming of a champion in my opinion.

There’s a difference between a defensive display and a display that lacks offense. The only other sport I watch is Soccer, and thus the only analogy that comes to mind is one where a strong home team comes up against a weaker away team who decide they only want a 0-0 draw. As the home team, the impetus is on them to break the other teams defense down, not throw their hands up in the air and call shenanigans (like Arsene Wenger so often does).

by -Sam on Apr 19, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anderson SIlva wasn’t looking for a draw, hell he won that fight handily. He was never in any real danger of losing and pretty much ran away with it on the judges scorecards.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think leites is just as much to blame and kinda feel like his response to the fight is way worse then silva’s

by drano on Apr 19, 2009 7:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m not sure if anyone has mentioned this today or not, but I thought that the championship fight was shitty.

Spinning out solid gold, like Rumpelstiltskin.

by Heenan on Apr 19, 2009 7:23 PM EDT reply actions  

You’re the first, but apparently anyone who hated that fight was really just lacking the intelligence to understand it, so don’t worry about. I’m going back to drueling in a cup now.

by Razzel on Apr 19, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, me too, but usually when I do it, I choose to drool. Drueling is just too much.

There’s nothing more satisfying to me than a big dump in the morning, and fucking up one of Luke’s threads.

Spinning out solid gold, like Rumpelstiltskin.

by Heenan on Apr 19, 2009 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Feed him to Jardine. Greg Jackson will create some sick gameplan that neutralizes his dancing and leg punches. Everyone though Rampage would destroy him and he almost got a decision out of it. Liddell struggled against him as did Forrest. He’s just the type of guy who neutralizes people’s strengths.

The Techno Viking will do justice for people who got screwed out of $45.

by Sokonojudo on Apr 19, 2009 7:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Right On

Having rewatched, I think the dancing / showboating to demonstrate that he was in total control really puts this performance over the top.

yes I think we should manage our expectations of Anderson and pay homage to true technical brilliance, but if this was the case, why was Silva petulantly placing his hands on his hips to complain every time Leites pulled guard? If being defensive and baffling his opponent were his true aims, are we to believe Silva was truly disappointed that Leites wouldn’t engage with him on the feet? If Silva was being cautious and was legitimately concerned about being hurt and thus planned and executed a careful and defensive strategy (as he claims) why did he make such a big deal about not being threatened by playing games (as evidenced by his dance moves and soccer-move behind the back leg kick which he couldn’t have possibly expected to do any meaningful damage)?

by trainyourmind on Apr 19, 2009 7:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Absolutely ridiculous.
He chose to childishly throw absurd and positively perfunctory kicks to Leites’s knees

Dude, if you think those straight kicks to the knee were “Absurd,” then i’d entreat you to eat 20+ of those kicks right to your knee joint. Silva’s a southpaw, Leites is orthodox; we’ve seen good strikers in the same position throw the same shot (ie Vera vs. Jardine). If it landed right, I bet it could tear an ACl/ MCL, and do some real damage.

Also, Silva has always been known to have a lengthy feeling out process with his opponent, in which he invites them to throw whatever they have at him (so that he can get a sense of their timing), and then he used sharp counters and creative combos to finish/ damage his opponents. However, he can’t do that if his opponent refuses to engage. IMO, Leites chose to butt scoot and flop on his back in order to avoid an embarassing KO loss.

Could Anderson have engaged more? Sure. Was the fight a snooz fest? Absolutely. But at any rate, Anderson took no damage whatsoever, and busted Thales up. You can’t fault a guy like Anderson (or Machida, etc) for dominating an opponent.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA.

'09 is the year of the FW's.

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 19, 2009 7:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Of course you can fault him
You can’t fault a guy like Anderson (or Machida, etc) for dominating an opponent.

Let’s apply the discussion to other sports. Say, basketball.

You’re the coach of the Dream Team, against a local C-level high school team. You’re good enough that you could blow them up to the tune of probably 300-10 if you wanted to; but instead, on offense you pass the ball around and commit a shot clock violation 1 out of every2 possessions, doing the same thing the other 50% of the time but jacking up a mid-to-long-range shot at the end of it. On defense, you keep them out of the paint, but they are free to fire away from outside.

Now, even playing in THIS manner you are going to beat them fairly handily – and you could say you “dominated” them – but could you really not be faulted? Can it really be said you don’t carry much blame for beating them by a somewhat lopsided score when you could have completely obliterated them?

The disparity between Silva and Leites is not THIS pronounced, but it isn’t far from it. On the feet, Silva could have dispatched Leites just about any time he wanted to. Instead he chose to do what he did, which did net him the win, but let’s not pretend you “can’t fault him” for his execution.

by Numbers on Apr 19, 2009 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

In your example the main person responsible would be the ones who booked the Dream Team against a a c-level high school team to start with because they should of known that as a stupid idea. Anderson Silva’s job isn’t to entertain fans it’s to win fights and he did win that fight handily. Did it suck ass? Yea it was pretty darn bad but his job isn’t to make everything look good it’s to win. The UFC is responsible for fan entertainment and they should be very pissed (as should fans who paid to watch that) but whether he did it to anyone else’s expectations or not Anderson Silva did his job, he won the fight.

Everyone has a right to be upset about how it went down but people also need to keep it in perspective once promotions or even fans start dictating to fighters how they should or shouldn’t fight we have a lot worse problem than Anderson Silva phoning one in against a outmatched guy who confused the butt scoot with engaging his opponent. As fans perhaps we really need to re-evaluate how we view Anderson Silva but it is his choice as to how he goes about fighting his fights.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

"In your example the main person responsible would be the ones who booked the Dream Team against a a c-level high school team to start with because they should of known that as a stupid idea."

It’s not a stupid idea. It’s a common practice. The c-teams do it to improve attendance levels, say, at the college level. For example, I went to William & Mary, which is a Div I-AA school, but they would bring in Duke to play them to get folks to go to the game. Did they get slaughtered? Sure, but it’s helps with the financial bottom line.

by Luke Thomas on Apr 19, 2009 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

My college is the warm-up team for LSU. We get beaten so badly, attendance barely spikes during those games. Doesn’t matter the sport, we’ll find a way to lose to them.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Apr 19, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

it’s stupid in the sense if you are doing it expecting to see a good event, you don’t book an exhibition game and expect the guys to play like they are in the Super Bowl.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

The clear difference between your example and an MMA bout is that there is no tangible incentive to blow a team out by X number of points. In other words, the game is going to last 48 minutes in we’re talking about the NBA, or whatever the rules state. Say the “Dream Team” could end the game at halftime if they go up by 35 points. They would likely go for it if we’re talking about two professional teams. In this case, there are clear incentives in ending the game quickly. I would venture to guess that if this were part of the rules, fans would get annoyed by the better team not trying to end the game early.

This match aside, a lot of MMA is putting on exciting bouts. No matter what anyone thinks, fighters will be punished if the bulk of fans don’t enjoy watching them fight. That’s the way it is; like it or not. The promotion has to make bouts people want to see and in turn buy.

by Cannon Jacques on Apr 19, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s the problem when comparing the business to the sport, it happens in every sport from time to time. Sometimes the sport just isn’t good for the business. The NFL makes more money off playoff games between large markets but they can’t control who does and doesn’t make it to the playoffs.

The UFC’s business is entertaining the fans but the fighter’s business is winning the fights, sometimes those two goals don’t overlap. The UFC has every right to be upset over this boring ass travesty but according to the judges score cards Anderson Silva won definatively. It’s a problem but what is the solution?

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

The difference between the NFL and the UFC is that the NFL is about a defined journey to the championship while the UFC is in the business of putting on fights between competitors who fans want to see – title at stake or not. Furthermore, the NFL changing this process to encourage games between large market teams would likely destroy the integrity of their product, given its long history. The UFC has no such structure.

I understand your point, and it’s a good one. There are no easy answers, but there is a reason why you never see Okami fighting on the main card of a big UFC event. In essence, the business of the fighter is to win the fight in a way that people want to see if at all possible. They don’t have to, but not doing so will likely lead to a less prominent position in the promotion.

by Cannon Jacques on Apr 19, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

The UFC can’t dictate how fighter’s fight (integrity of the sport and all) so the only control they have is matchmaking. Of course that also is going to take away some from the integrity of the sport too but it’s the only way I can see to control stuff like this. Everyone makes fun of Vince McMahan but his original criticisms of MMA were valid, in MMA you can’t control the product or tell the fighters how to fight you just have to hope the fights are exciting and the right guys catch on.

Everyone gripes about a pure sport but in a pure sport your going to occasionally get crap like this. Personally I prefer a bit less pure and a bit more of “don’t bore the shit out of me”. I would appriciate it if Joe Silva doesn’t ever book anything like this again, even if that means that say Okami gets screwed out of his title shot.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

That's extremely childish, for several reasons.

1) I watch enough MMA that I see many exciting fights. I don’t have to be thrilled by Anderson Silva every time he fights, because he’s doing his job- fighting. And winning those fights. Whether or not he finishes them in exciting fashion is just icing on the cake. When I watch A Silva, I expect to see a very technical, creative striker who is well rounded, and a good game planner.

2) I’d rather see a guy like Anderson in action against fighters with merit, who are deserving of a shot against him, rather than a giant mismatch (talent/ experience wise, or stylistically) which is extremely thrilling. My problem with the Silva/ Leites fight is that it happened in the first place, when a guy like Okami (who is much more deserving and higher regarded than Thales, not to mention the compelling plot between Silva and Yushin) has been winning all his fights, and just sitting on the sidelines.

3) If you think Joe Silva has the final say when it comes to title shots, you’re mistaken. Dana White runs an autocratic orgainisation in which he basically calls all the big shots, which entails things like main event decisions, title shots, etc. Not to say that Joe Silva doesn’t have a say in the matter, but it’s definitely not his decision to make. If you want to bitch about something, bitch about undercard fights that you weren’t satisfied with, because that’s where JS has a great deal of influence.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA.

'09 is the year of the FW's.

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 19, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

1. You might not have to be thrilled every time but obviously there are lots of people who do have to be, just look around the MMA internet community today. People are fighting mad about his performance and even Dana White is embarrassed by it so obviously it is important.

2. Leites had won his last 5 fights, Okami has only won his last three. I’m not saying Okami isn’t deserving but lets not act like he is so much more deserving that Thales Leites was. The problem with Leites wasn’t that he was undeserving it’s that he was a lousy style match up and Anderson Silva is just that much better than most of the guys in the division.

3. I don’t care if Santa Claus books the fights if the UFC wants my money then they better entertain my ass, that’s how it works. Professional sports are about making money, if they don’t make money then the sport goes away. Anderson Silva may not have to worry about the business/entertainment end of the sport but the UFC better be.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

1) You might enjoy another program on television, which guarantees action and compelling plotlines in every installment. It’s called WWE/ TNA.

2) Let’s compare Leites’ wins/ losses to Okami’s. Leites beat Pete Sell, Floyd Sword, Ryan Jensen, Marquardt, and McFedries, after losing to Kampmann. The win over Marquardt was questionable- minus the point deductions, anyone who watched the fight can tell that Nate won. Okami, on the other hand, has wins over Belcher, Swick, MacDonald, and Lister (which IMO, is much better Comp). He also has the previous win/ bad blood with Anderson.

3) You should buy the cards because you love the sport, and because you’re entertained by MMA. If you don’t like the sport, don’t buy the cards. Simple as that.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA.

'09 is the year of the FW's.

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 19, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

1. There is a good chance that I have been watching Pro Wrestling since before you were born. The fact that I have also enjoyed pure entertainment in the past is irrelevant to the point that professional sports exist to make money. I know that is hard for some people to swallow but it’s just how it is, want to follow a pure sport pick a amateur one.

2. As you said yourself IMO. That is purely opinion. Of course Okami is also known for something else, being painfully boring, obviously not what the UFC needs right now.

3. I love the sport but I am also not a moron I know that if the sport doesn’t make money it won’t be there for anyone to enjoy in the future. It’s just this simple, if people don’t buy/watch the shows then promotion doesn’t make money and if they aren’t making money they won’t be able to pay fighters and the fighters will find another way to make a living and the sport will be dead. Here is the real kicker for you, no one cares why you or I personally watch MMA they care about why the vast majority of fans watch it. People are obviously peeved about the Anderson Silva fight and that is a problem for the UFC.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

All valid points.

And I already know that this is subjective, you don’t have to remind me that it’s my opinion.

But in all honesty, I think the best way to solve this problem is to lift some of the rules which water down the sport. Then you would see more exciting finishes. The ‘fouls’ i’m talking about, that IMO should be reinstated:

Knees to the head on the ground.
Stomps to the head of a grounded opponent.
Soccer kicks to the head of a grounded opponent.
Small joint manipulation.
Headbutts.
Downward elbows.

I think this would prevent 1 dimensional BJJ guys from butt scooting constantly (due to the threat of getting stomped in the dome), and it would encourage fighters to learn better takedown defense (so that they don’t get headbutted, or have their guard passed and get kneed in the head). As for small joint manipulation, I think it has very practical application in combat, and if a fighter can’t defend against wristlocks/ finger holds/ etc, then they should have to submit or have their joints broken.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA.

'09 is the year of the FW's.

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 20, 2009 3:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, the UFC does affect how some fighters fight through bonuses. Obviously, the announced bonuses provide a bigger boost for those fighters that aren’t making in the six figures. Personally, I have some issues with the bonus structure.

Don’t take what I’m saying as meaning that the UFC should tell the fighters how to fight. I’m just stating the situation as I see it. I’m tend to gravitate toward the pure sport more than the showmanship, and that’s probably because of how closely I’ve followed team sports throughout my life. Plus, I’m cynical and don’t care for bullshit.

I think trying to separate what Silva must do to win from what Silva may want to do in order to make himself more valuable as fighter is a bit of a mistake. In reality, you can’t separate the two. From the standpoint of living up to his role as a fighter, I can’t see that he did anything wrong as there is nothing to compel him to take anymore chances than he did. However, if I were the supreme leader of the UFC and fans weren’t going to buy a PPV because Silva was fighting, I’d have to slide him into a role of less prominence. In other words, I wouldn’t tell to do anything, but he would suffer. You can’t afford to allow one fighter to tank an entire event.

Now, could better matches be made? I suppose. This wouldn’t be as big of a deal if it were an isolated incident, but Silva clowned on Cote – a guy that could only really threaten Silva with a big punch. I think Bisping or Henderson are better matchups than Leites, because they’ll probably want to strike some. Maia, I’d like to see, but I don’t know if it’s in the cards.

by Cannon Jacques on Apr 19, 2009 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with all of this.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Irrelevant analogy, comparing two completely different sports.

A win is a win, whether by an inch or a mile.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA.

'09 is the year of the FW's.

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 19, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

in a sport driven by PPV buys...

all wins are not created equal.

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

That’s the difference between the sport and the business of the sport.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Silva is known for a lengthy feeling out process and for being almost purely a counter puncher than why should his opponent have to oblige by throwing first? Isn’t the smart strategy against silva to wait for him to punch and try to counter punch him? Its not refusing to engage, its playing the correct strategy against a counter puncher and it just leads to a stalemate. That is why pure counter punchers are pussies, they ruin the fight game.

by Dropkick434 on Apr 19, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats not a smart strategy at all. expecting silva to change his strategy when he is still winning is dumb as hell

by yngjzy on Apr 19, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

That started at the very beginning of the fight.

by Dropkick434 on Apr 19, 2009 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

and it lasted the whole fight even when it clearly wasn’t working

by yngjzy on Apr 19, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

i also don’t think it was leites intention to counterstrike at all. i think that was probably cote’s intent, but i’m fairly sure leites was just looking to fight on the ground.

by yngjzy on Apr 19, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

No.

The smart strategy is to find a way to pull the counter striker out of his game- something Leites was completely unable to do. He lacked the wrestling to consistently put Anderson on his back, and keep him there. He lacked the standup to land any meaningful strikes. He lacked the kind of explosive Jiu Jitsu necessary to lock up a submission on Silva.

Anderson was the agressor for the majority of the fight, and even though he was very conservative with how many strikes he decided to throw, and how agressive he was throughout the fight, it’s undeniable that Anderson came out of the fight virtually unscathed, whereas Thales left with a busted up face, and jacked up leg.

Supporting all Las Vegas MMA.

'09 is the year of the FW's.

by ElliotMatheny on Apr 19, 2009 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

not just wrestling Leites was scared to clinch at all with Silva. Silva tried a number of times to clinch with him but leites wasn’t having any of it if he had a little of Judo or Greco in his game I think he may have had an easier time getting the fight where he wanted it

by drano on Apr 19, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed 110%

I have the card on my DVR. I will not watch that garbage again. More power to ya Luke for watching it over I know you had to so you could write this up. Plain and simple I was disgusted with Silva last night. I cut him some slack in the Cote fight but last night was probably, no make that THE worst title fight I’ve ever seen.

Nice work on this, Rec’d!

Mike Goldberg: "You know Joe, When Matt and his brother Mark Hughes were growing up, they would pound each other behind the barn."

by xFenixKnightx on Apr 19, 2009 7:56 PM EDT reply actions  

He tried to punch him in the leg as well, right? That was absurd. From the third round on Anderson and everyone watching knew Leites had nothing for him. I’m a huge fan of Anderson and Machida. To compare Machida eluding strikes from people who can hurt him to Anderson toying with outclassed opponents is ridiculous. He could have ended it and chose not to for whatever reason. Needless to say i’m disappointed.

by Kenneth Major on Apr 19, 2009 7:58 PM EDT reply actions  

i kept waiting

everyround i said this is it…hes done..hes got him…any second now….man that fight sucked. i honestly believe that he couldve finished that fight anytime between the 3rd and 5th round…but he wouldnt do it..yea those front knee kicks were brutal but dam quit fuckin around. at one point he had him on the ground in leites gaurd late in the fight and if he wouldve just threw ten more punches it wouldve been over. but no just got up and got back to dickin around. give him to wanderlei or rampage!

by baldspot23 on Apr 19, 2009 8:15 PM EDT reply actions  

The more I think about last night’s fight, the more I think that it’s Leites who will suffer the most from the lackluster main event. True, as Luke Thomas points out, Silva bears the greater responsibility considering he has a world of skill and is far and away the top dog in that division, but it’s Leites who will be kicking himself years from now. What I saw last night in Leites was a fighter that genuinely competed through the first two rounds. Early in the third, however, he mentally folded when it began to become clear what the inevitable outcome would be. Listen, I’m all for guys sticking to a gameplan for as long as possible and being patient. However, when it becomes evident to everyone in the building that a strategy has failed, a fighter who has a golden opportunity in front of them owes it to himself to go all out and throw the kitchen sink at his opponent. Again, both guys should apologize to the fans for their effort (especially Silva). But Silva will have future opportunities to make it right. He’ll main event a major pay-per-view again this year and get another chance to show that he’s the world’s best. If Leties has any pride, he’ll never forgive himself. Most fighters go their entire career and never get a shot at being the world’s best in their weight class. Still more rare is a second such opportunity. I doubt Leites will ever get another. And that is the shame. To me, he’s that guy in the office that has potential to get promoted and advance, but always declines because he’s afraid to fail. That’s what he was in the cage last night. He failed himself by mentally folding early and going into survival mode for the rest of the match. I’ll bet anything that the regret he’ll feel in the coming years when he remembers that fight as he puts his head down on his pillow at nigth will hurt him more than any knockout shot from Silva ever would have. He probably wouldn’t have won anyway, but if he had left no bullets in the gun, he could have been at peace with the fact that he gave it all he had in his big moment on the world stage. Everyone keeps saying “Leties is who he thought he was.” But while I agree that we knew that he didn’t have the skill of Silva, I had no idea that he had such little heart. Maybe he can take solace in the fact that guys the world over that are fearful of taking chances and avoid them like the plague have finally found a fighter that they can identify with.

by Rich Wyatt on Apr 19, 2009 8:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed. This was his shot at the belt. If you want the belt, go for it. If not, throw in the towel after round 2 and go home.

He had no contingency plans, and was essentially going through the motions for 15 minutes.

by bigweeze on Apr 19, 2009 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luke, I'd be intrested to hear your thoughts on Machida....

….and his fights w/ Hoger, Kaz, and David Heath. Machida, who is obviously more skilled than those fighters used his counter punching style to avoid all damage and won a decision. Silva’s fight was even worse because he had an opponent who was totally unwilling to engage.

Amateurs that pull guard then get TKOed aren’t usually world class BJJ practitioners. Silva was fighting a smart fight. However, I do think your argument has validity in that Anderson IS holding back to somehow protest some beef he has w/ the UFC.

by Dexerion on Apr 19, 2009 9:15 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Anyone else want to see GSP eat Anderson Silva’s lunch? At least GSP show up and takes his opponents seriously. Right now it would be pretty glorious to see Anderson get ground down a la BJ Penn.

PS. Will Zombie Strippers be liveblogged tonight?

Keep firing Assholes!

by Ubernoober on Apr 19, 2009 9:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Did anyone else...

start to think “man…the only attempt to finish the fight by Anderson is those kicks…is he trying to blow out another guy’s knee?” Those are injury kicks, much different from the typical leg kick, they’re meant to blow up a guy’s knee.

Before someone pulls out the “it’s the point of a fight to hurt the other guy” let me just say that I’m not faulting him for the kicks. I just got the impression that he may have been trying to see if he could blow up another guy’s knee

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 9:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe. He also might have been trying to get Thales to fight him.

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

And by that I mean, “Hey Thales, fight me or I’m going to try and blow out your knee.”

http://www.sackmikegoldberg.com

by Mike Fagan on Apr 19, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

That’s exactly what I thought he was doing and I thought the fight would pick up.

But Thales really just shrugged it off. Just like you would pull the covers over your head if someone was talking to you but you were hung over.

by bigweeze on Apr 19, 2009 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he was trying to blow out a knee, why not use his psychic Jedi powers like against Cote? Further proof he underperformed!

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. -Samuel Beckett

by Scott C. Broussard on Apr 19, 2009 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I too got that impression

by Josh H. on Apr 19, 2009 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brent, you’re usually fair but I think you’re being critical when you shouldn’t. Any person would assume an attack on a joint would stir some sort of reaction on Thales’ part. But it didn’t really, aside from Thales choosing to try and minimize the damage he was taking.

People often use the term “looking for a way out”, when they lose a fight. But Thales had already checked out of the fight at that point and never got back into it.

by bigweeze on Apr 19, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Armbars, etc. are attempts to ruin a guy’s joint as well. Are they unsporting and malicious?

by bigweeze on Apr 19, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

i never said unsporting or malicious...

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry I misunderstood, I know you didn’t say that. But trying to blow up a guy’s knee just because would seem to be malicious to me. And while you do attempt to damage joints, the object is finishing the fight (by tap), not to actually cause serious injury. That’s why I think it was just an attempt to provoke.

I am interested in that kick though, I first saw Condit use it a few times on the card where Torres fought Beebe.

by bigweeze on Apr 19, 2009 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

i'm not trying to be overly critical...

I’m just…curious if anyone else was thinking that it seemed like he may have been going after a guy’s knee. I’ve heard from multiple muay thai guys now that you only use that kind of strike to do “real damage” to a joint. Not just to wear a guy out…etc

I’m not judging its use by anderson. I’m just curious…

Contributing Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.

http://CurseOfRonKarkovice.blogspot.com/

by Brent Brookhouse on Apr 19, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand what you’re talking about. It’s pretty taboo in football to cut a guy in the knees. The two aren’t good comparisons. The sports are much different and the actions are different as well. To be honest, I hate to see a guy get repeatedly drilled in the knee. It’s legal, but I still don’t care to see it. Maybe, Leites should have done something different like pull guard. Oh…wait…never mind.

by Cannon Jacques on Apr 19, 2009 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good comparison. But he was only getting drilled in the knee because he wasn’t doing anything.

O-linemen will cut you no matter what.

by bigweeze on Apr 20, 2009 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Machida effect

Love all the Machida fanboys calling the kettle black here saying this was a horrible performance. Silva refuses to engage first. Machida refuses to engage first. As someone else pointed out, when Machida gets the belt, the first few fights will be with guys who just charge forward like Leben and get rocked by counters. Then people will realize that as long as they don’t throw, they’re never at risk.

 Guys still make good money when they lose title fights, so as long as they don’t get hurt, it’s an easy payday. It was a horrible fight. Leites is to blame at least as much as Silva. I’d cut him if I were Dana. To put on such a gutless performance after the UFC invested time and money promoting this fight, is a joke.

by dwv114 on Apr 19, 2009 10:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Expectations

It comes down to expectations and responsibilities. Silva had a different sent of expectations of him than Leites had. This is why “Leites is just as much to blame as Silva” carries no credence, in my book.

Put basely, this PPV was about Silva, not about Leites. However, more specifically, this PPV was about Silva’s skills - while Silva proceeded to carry himself for 25 minutes as though the PPV was about him.

This is why many fans, myself included, actually felt insulted by Silva’s performance. He was in effect saying “I can do whatever I want to in here and you guys will pay me to watch it”.

by Numbers on Apr 19, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anderson SIlva’s job is to win fights not entertain your asses, he wasn’t saying anything at all you at home because your opinion doesn’t matter to him. Anderson Silva has no extra responsibilites and your expectations of him are entirely yoursand yours alone, he won that fight and he won it easily he did his job (not well but he definatly did his full job). Now rest assured it’s entirely different for the UFC, they rely on you buying their shows and it is their job to give you entertainment for your hard earned dollar. For Anderson SIlva this is another check mark in the win column, for the UFC this is a disaster, that is where there are different expectations and responsibilities.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anderson SIlva’s job is to win fights not entertain your asses

You have an argument here, but for Silva to take such an attitude is cynical in the extreme, and he will pay for it. If he as MW Champ cannot draw PPV buys or buys at the gate, I can’t see how he will not suffer in terms of bonus money and, more importantly, gaining a reputation as a fighter who has contempt for his sport and thus for MMA fans.

Different people take on responsibilities to varying degrees in life: some coast, some fight as hard as they can, and some outright run. But a champion — at anything — is never content to define his or her responsibilities down when given the opportunity.

by JR Dogman on Apr 19, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh it will undoubtably cost him fans and money but that’s his perogative. He went out and dominated Thales Leites, he just didn’t meet fan expectations(it was painfully lacking in this area). No one is saying that people can’t jump off the guys bandwagon or boo the guy it’s just that you can’t take that win away from him because he did it how he wanted to do it instead of how the fans wanted him to.

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

"I don't know what sort of childish protest Silva is launching here."

I think that is exactly what was happening: it was a protest.

The UFC is the premier MMA organization, but its current MW division clearly cannot provide Silva with meaningful competition. Imagine how frustrated Silva had to find this joke of a title fight, particularly after the other absurd matchup with Cote; it must have been like fighting a child for him, twice in a row. These matches were made only because there was no one else to pit against Silva, and that is a terrible thing from a business perspective, and it is equally bad for an elite athlete such as Silva.

The only MW I can think of who would present a serious challenge to Anderson Silva is Cung Le. If that match cannot be made, Silva needs to move up to 205, period, as for him to continue in the MW division as it is presently is a total waste of his talent and the fans’ money.

by JR Dogman on Apr 19, 2009 10:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Cung Le? Seriously? The only guy of note Cung Le ever beat was Frank Shamrock, are we now saying that that one win puts him ahead of guys like Marquart or Henderson or Demian Maia or Wanderlei Silva?

by who me on Apr 19, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cung Le? Seriously?

Yeah, definitely — you ever see some of his San Shou matches? I think he’s very much like Anderson Silva: he pulls off crazy kicks and strikes, and he’s got incredible Greco throws. Plus he is ferocious — he’s got a fighter’s spirit, and an equally impressive athleticism. And yet, he has not really been challenged: the best San Shou fighters could not hang with him, and not one of his MMA fights went the distance — they all ended by KO or TKO. Yes, it’s true Shamrock was not the fighter he used to be when he faced Le, but give Le a little credit: he broke Shamrock’s arm to finish the fight; his legs are like tree trunks, and he throws them hard and with accuracy.

I think Le and Anderson would make an incredible stand-up war. The question is, is Le still interested in fighting?

by JR Dogman on Apr 19, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Anderson’s effectiveness hurt him in this match. Leites was demoralized, and spent the last 3 rounds trying to avoid damage without risking himself. There was essentially no chance for him to land a punch with the way Anderson was stonewalling him, so he stopped trying.

Nobody minds Machida counterfighting, but I would point out one difference. Machida fights opponents who are more willing to engage because they aren’t physically overmatched by him, and he doesn’t have the record of being quite so dangerous (his last 3 wins were against relatively aggressive opponents as well). Lyoto isn’t bigger, faster, or longer than any of them, just more skilled. So opponents are willing to engage, knowing that they are at a disadvantage but also knowing that they do have a chance if they can put their fist in the right place.

Another thing about Anderson is that he fights to the level of his competition – the more active they are, the more active he will be. If they hit him, it gets him upset.

I wish he was more aggressive, but this is no different than Lennox Lewis jabbing his way to victory, or Mayweather putting on a clinic. Put the man in a fight where it is in his interest to finish, and he’ll do it. If they can’t find a dangerous opponent, it’s probably a sign that the fight shouldn’t be a title fight. I didn’t like the matchmaking in the first place, but there was no perfect matchup at the time they booked this. In hindsight, given Leites’ performance, it should have been Okami.

by bigweeze on Apr 19, 2009 10:53 PM EDT reply actions  

By the way the writers are talking about this match, someone needs to get on writing an apology letter to “sloppy kickboxing” to see if it’s not too late to get it back!!!

Or call the Wizard of Oz to give Thales some heart. He could have just thrown in the towel after 2 rounds instead of checking out mentally.

by bigweeze on Apr 19, 2009 10:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Machida is a bad influence on Anderson. Machida’s style often includes backpedaling into places where noone can coneivably land a strike. I would refer to this as disengaging, and this “lost time” extends the match but decreases the amount of action possible in the alloted time. It is admirable that neither has been taking much damage recently, but they also aren’t at risk for a significant portion of the match. Anderson was actually sticking out his chin and begging to get hit a number of times, so I’ll criticize him less for disengaging/running. But he did pass up many offensive opportunities.

I would also contrast Machida/Anderson’s style with Rashad/Chuck’s counter-fighting. The latter will take the opportunities presented to them. Machida and Anderson will pass up a large portion of opportunities for no apparent reason. It does make opponents more reluctant to strike if you aren’t going to exchange with them. And if both sides then choose to play the waiting game, everybody looks bad.

by bigweeze on Apr 19, 2009 11:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Nailed it on the head.

The only thing I might have added was the amount of time Silva was standing in the pocket, with Leites face right in range… but all he did was paw at him. Leites wasn’t threatening any sort of counter, he was only pawing at him as well. Extremely frustrating to watch.

by Meeaaat on Apr 19, 2009 11:42 PM EDT reply actions  

know who I'd like to see in the UFC?

Raymond Daniels.

I don’t know if he’s training for MMA, but I hope so.

by JR Dogman on Apr 19, 2009 11:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Raymond Daniel's MMA debut...

… was a disaster. He fought Jeremiah Metcalf and got submitted by rnc in the 2nd round in Strikeforce. It was a very brutal welcome and since then Raymond has not tried MMA again.

by kongqueror on Apr 20, 2009 3:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was a Silva fan until last night, what a terrible display. I can appreciate (didn’t say I liked) Machida’s elusiveness but this was just a shameful display of unwillingness to fight, as much on Silvas part as Leites in my opinion.
I really think it’s Silva trying to ‘throw a fit’ or complain about not being able to fight Boxing ala Roy Jones Jr. Ever since that storyline was kyboshed Silva hasn’t really been himself.
At this point Silva reminds me of Arlovski now, except the UFC doesn’t have an anti-Silva like Arlovski had with Silvia where they could remove him as champion.
I seriously hope they throw him in the deep end in the 205 division, murderers row and tell him to sink or swim.

If I sit down and think of some of my favorite fighters, the ones I enjoy watching the most and think of them put in Silva’s position like last night I can’t think of a single one that would have let Leites out of the 3rd + round like that. Leites was begging to be finished and Silva refused to.

97 had the worst main event in a LONG time.

by pr0cs on Apr 19, 2009 11:49 PM EDT reply actions  

You thought that quote was alarming...

You will be awake on this one

“I did well in the fight,” said Silva in Portuguese. “I can’t always make you happy.”

Silva continued his condemnation of Montreal’s vocal MMA fans.

“Not everyone understands what they are watching,” Silva said. “But hey, you guys can boo if you want. You are paying my salary.”

To his credit, Silva did what he needed to do to emerge victorious against a BJJ black belt the caliber of Leites. For all fans know, he may have executed his gameplan perfectly.

“I have a lot of respect for Leites’ ground game,” he said. “I trained with him and Andre Pederneiras before and their school is a good one. I did my job. It’s not always what you want.”

by The Bronzeville Bully on Apr 19, 2009 11:53 PM EDT reply actions  

It’s a good thing (or bad) that Anderson has his translator to sugarcoat, because I had also read something similar. The translation of the post-fight interview was NOT what Anderson said.

by bigweeze on Apr 20, 2009 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

There are already people correcting those translations.

Unfortunately, the UFC’s translator rarely does justice to what Anderson says. There is a guy who is Portugese in another thread here correcting those quotes already.

Maybe yet another reason for him to work on learning english.

by Razreshat on Apr 20, 2009 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand

Why people are upset over the lack luster performance in the fights on saturday, but what we have to accept, not all fights and matchups are going to be exciting. Seriously think about it for a second, is it even remotely possible to make match ups that are always going to bring excitement to a fight, no. We’ve seen time and time again fights that were touted as the “fight of the year” and turned out to be a snoozer. And then there are the fights that no one is even interested in until the first punch is thrown and then bang, fight of the night or even year. It happens, thats the nature of the beast. Not every fight can be exciting, pissed off or not, thats just how the game goes.

by proflex on Apr 20, 2009 10:17 AM EDT reply actions  

All of this complaining would be a lot more meaningful if somebody had in mind a fighter who could beat Silva in the UFC.

I liked his performance and was mostly disgusted at Dana White and Joe Silva for putting this fight together.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Apr 20, 2009 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

That phrase was meant to indicate under the unified rules. So yeah: you got anybody that can make weight at 185 that you think will beat him? I don’t.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Apr 20, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

How much would you be willing to bet on Mousasi? Personally, until i can see him fight somewhere with drug screening against better opponents, I’m not certain enough to even make a prediction.

Don't believe a word I say, I don't train BJJ. -- TangleBones

by jemaleddin on Apr 20, 2009 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mousasi is moving to Light Heavyweight because he says the cut is too much to Middleweight.

by who me on Apr 20, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Entertainment Factor: Good Strategy?

Silva’s performance was disappointing indeed, but he should not be held to a higher standard than his opponent— regardless of who it is. Both fighters earned their way to the top, and both ought to be required to justify keeping their place inside the Octagon.

Unfortunately, one means by which a fighter substantiates his place at the apex of MMA is by catering to his audience. Perhaps too often the entertainment factor conflicts with a fighter’s strategy. True, Silva has an enviable set of tools, but who’s to say he has to use them? As a Spider fan of epic proportions, I was both frustrated and, frankly, bored by his lackluster performance. But he won employing one of the most efficient tools in the box: strategy. With the belt on the line, why risk using the drill, when you’re comfortable with the screwdriver?

MMA is a “for-profit” sport intended first and foremost to entertain. Putting on a show (a la WWE) has the potential to limit and, in some cases, delegitimize the athletic performance—and intelligence—of the contenders. If this were merely a “sport for the sake of sport,” a referee would not, for example, be pressured to stand opponents engaged in the ground game on account of hissing and booing.

In essence— Anderson Silva and Thales Leites were sportsmen, not actors. For this reason, they should be lauded. While it’s true neither “fought” for the belt with fervor, both cast a scheme for it— and to put it bluntly, these fellas are not, and nor should they be vying for an Oscar.

by Effie429 on Apr 21, 2009 2:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Correction

[Sic] MMA is not intended first and foremost to entertain— but the strain of MMA known as the UFC is. ~Effie

by Effie429 on Apr 21, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I don't want to knock my opponent out. I want to hit him, step away and watch him hurt" - Joe Frazier

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Predicting A Collegiate Wrestler’s Development
Shogun_logo_small
UFC’s Hopes For A Stadium Show In Sao Paulo Appear To Be Dead
Small
The Downfall of Diego Sanchez
Small
The time is right for a superfight, and it doesn't involve Anderson
391807_10150399618817701_750257700_8470850_1424416169_n_small
1 in about 7 billion!  :D

Recent FanPosts

Img_0019_small
Training Progress
Small
Muay Thai camps in Thailand
Blav_small
OT: Help out my short film
Badr_hari3_small
War Machine explains what happenned and asks for support
Warrior_small
MMA Transaction Wire: February 4-10
Bv_small
BE Trivia Night

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

MMA Rankings

USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings